Armenia Became Independent in Late 1991, One of the Newly-Autonomous Nations Formed by the Dissolution of the Soviet Union

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Armenia Became Independent in Late 1991, One of the Newly-Autonomous Nations Formed by the Dissolution of the Soviet Union A r m e n i a History and Overview Potato was introduced to Eurasia from its Andean American center of origin via Western Europe, probably in the late sixteenth or early seventeenth century by mariners from Portugal, and subsequently other European countries. The diffusion of potato into the Caucasus region is not well documented, but probably occurred at various times via various routes. One possibility is via Persia (contemporary Iran), where documents refer to a presentation of potato to the Persian court by the British consul in the early nineteenth century (Laufer 1938), but this formal introduction does not preclude the likelihood of less formal migrations, a process probably still ongoing. Armenia became independent in late 1991, one of the newly-autonomous nations formed by the dissolution of the Soviet Union. Armenia is small (slightly less than 30,000 square kilometers) and landlocked. However, the modern state occupies only part of historical Armenia, whose ancient centers were located in the valley of the Aras River and the region around Lake Van in Turkey (LOC: Society and Environment). Independence initially brought arduous challenges, as the new nation had to adapt to a "stand alone" economy. Under the Soviet system, Armenia had developed an industrial sector, supplying manufactured goods to other Soviet territories in exchange for raw materials and energy. The agricultural system, characterized by specialized agro-industrial state holdings under the Soviet system, is being converted to smaller-scale private operations, initially in need of additional investment and updated technology (CIA Factbook). The transition to independence of former Soviet territories also incited a latent conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan over Nagorno-Karabakh, a predominately Armenian-populated region assigned to Soviet Azerbaijan by Moscow in the 1920s (faintly visible on the map, page 5). Tension escalated as Soviet authority was weakening in the late 1980s, and Armenians in Karabakh demanded that their territory be transferred from Soviet Azerbaijan to Soviet Armenia. The dispute developed into a military conflict as both nations attained independence. By May 1994, when a cease-fire had been achieved, 20,000 people had been killed, and more than a million were displaced (de Waal 2019, p. 99). Both nations have suffered serious setbacks, and the conflict has not been resolved. Armenia has endured further isolation, as Turkey maintains an economic blockade in protest of Armenian occupation of what it regards as areas of Azerbaijan (CIA Factbook: Armenia, Transnational Issues). Armenia's only surface access to the world is via Georgia to the Black Sea, but even this route has been interrupted by Georgia's own traumas. In October 2020, the dispute again escalated, resolved (in terms of immediate military conflict) as of March 2021. • From Wikipedia: Nagorno- Karabakh Conflict. • Chapter four of Thomas de Waal’s The Caucasus (2019) provides a concise history (20th and 21st centuries) of the conflict. Through these events, Armenian agriculture (both crops and livestock) has faced enormous challenges. Wheat is essential, but domestic production is not nearly sufficient. Even in normal years, Armenia has to cover the shortfall by importing most of its wheat, roughly 500,000 tons, or 165 kilograms annually per capita (UNDP p. 33). The production of wheat remained fairly stable for several years, but the harvest in 2017 declined by almost half from the previous year. Harvests of grapes and other fruit, important as cash crops, declined sharply in the early years of independence absent assured markets and more expensive water via irrigation. (Armenia has long been renowned for the cognac produced by its grapes.) • Hunger in Armenia (September 2018) is published by Borgen Magazine, citing data from several sources. 1 Agriculture as a share of the Armenian economy has been in overall decline, accounting for 37 per cent of gross domestic product (GDP) in 1994, but only 12 per cent in 2020 (Word Bank 2020: Armenia). Agriculture nonetheless remains a major source of employment, as of 2020 accounting for approximately 30 per cent of the labor force (World Bank: Employment in Agriculture, Armenia). Much of that employment, especially for potato cultivation, is of women. Perhaps it is no coincidence that many potato varieties cultivated in Armenia bear female names, as reported by JAMNews: Armenia’s Potato Queendom. (Coffee break, from the JAMNews story) Armenia's potato crop (the "second bread" of the Caucasus and Central Asia) has remained essential to its food security, by volume Armenia’s leading staple. From 1992 to 2014, per capita production increased from 90 to approximately 240 kilograms, very high by world standards (FAO). Production has since been in decline due mostly to factors affecting Armenia’s agriculture in general, including drought in some regions and shortages of production inputs. Potato yields have possibly suffered from the disruption of the formal seed system as a source of disease-free planting materials and new varieties, although it seems that potato (probably including seed potato) crosses borders even when they are officially blockaded. Potato retains a strong role in Armenia’s food security, as of October 2020 possibly more so if the conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan escalates further. The challenges facing agriculture in Armenia are illustrated by the graph next page, based on data reported by FAOSTAT (accessed October 2020). Although harvested weight is a crude measure of nutritional or commercial value − a kilogram of walnuts is obviously far more valuable than a kilogram of watermelon − aggregated values nonetheless provide an indication of general trends. Crops included in the graph (in addition to potato) are: • Cereals: wheat, barley, maize, oats, and rye. • Fruits, nuts, and tree crops: apples, apricots, figs, grapes, peaches and nectarines, pears, plums and sloes, walnuts, and watermelon. • Vegetables: beans, cabbage and other brassicas, carrots and turnips, cauliflower and broccoli, cucumbers and gherkins, garlic, mushrooms and truffles, onions, peas, and tomatoes. 2 Production Graphs Production is displayed in metric tons, average yields in metric tons per hectare, and area harvested in hectares. All graphs indicate yields in tons per hectare, but the scale of other factors is adjusted for optimal display. Per capita production graphs display total production and population, with annual production per capita derived from those two values. Production per capita is displayed consistently by kilograms, but the scale of other factors is adjusted for display. Data are provided by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAOSTAT), accessed April 2021. (Potato production has apparently stabilized since the data reported through 2018, displayed above.) 3 Ge o g ra ph y and Areas of Cultivation Physical Geography Armenia is the most mountainous of the Caucasus republics, forming part of the Lesser Caucasus range extending also through parts of Georgia and Azerbaijan, a complex topography formed by geological upheavals beginning 25 million years ago. Roughly half the area of the country lies at altitudes over 2,000 meters above sea level (masl), and only about three percent below 650 masl. The highest point in Armenia, Mount Aragats, reaches 4,090 masl. Most of the population lives in the western and northwestern areas of the country, where the two major cities, Erevan and Gyumri, are located (LOC: Society and Environment). In spite of the mountainous terrain of Armenia, agriculture remains so important to the country that land under agricultural production (including perennial pastures) accounts for 62 percent of the total area (USAID 2017). A study published by the World Bank estimated that land devoted to annual crops accounts for 11 percent of total area (World Bank 2012). • Several Thematic Maps of Armenia and the Central Asia and Caucasus Region are available via the University of Texas. Armenia’s mountainous terrain is a source of hazard, especially earthquakes and landslides. In December 1988, the second largest city, Gyumri (formerly Leninakan), was heavily damaged by a massive quake that killed more than 25,000 people. Heavy rains (becoming more common with climate change) can oversaturate unstable areas, resulting in landslides destroying hundreds of buildings and vital infrastructure, such as roads, railways, and reservoirs. Armenia’s topographic complexity is also reflected in a high level of biodiversity, especially relative to the small size of the country. However, more than 15 percent of Armenia’s plant species are in danger of local extinction, as more land is projected to degrade to desert or semi-desert over the next several decades (USAID 2017). Climate and Precipitation Armenia's climate is generally dependent on altitude and the local effects of the Lesser Caucasus range, which blocks the potentially moderating climatic influences of the Mediterranean and the Black Sea. Local and seasonal variations are severe. Apart from these general factors, Armenian farmers must be very sensitive to local variations caused by strong vertical gradients and aspect (the direction in which land faces), which greatly affect local solar radiation, hence climate. 4 On the Armenian Plateau, the mean midwinter temperature is 0° C, and the mean midsummer temperature exceeds 25° C. In the lowlands and foothills, the annual frost-free period is generally more than 220 days, but declines to about 150 days in mid- mountain areas, and can be as short as 60 days at the highest altitudes (USAID 2017). A strong warming trend appears to be accelerating. A study commis- sioned by the World Bank (2012) projects that over the next 50 years, the average increase in temperature across Armenia will be about 2.6°C, compared with the 0.85°C increase in temperature observed over the last 80 years. Temperature impacts are expected to be especially severe in the Ararat Valley, site of currently the highest-yielding potato cultivation in the country. Average annual precipitation ranges from 250 millimeters in the lower Aras River valley to 800 millimeters at the highest altitudes (Tumanian 2006).
Recommended publications
  • Agricultural Value-Chains Assessment Report April 2020.Pdf
    1 2 ABOUT THE EUROPEAN UNION The Member States of the European Union have decided to link together their know-how, resources and destinies. Together, they have built a zone of stability, democracy and sustainable development whilst maintaining cultural diversity, tolerance and individual freedoms. The European Union is committed to sharing its achievements and its values with countries and peoples beyond its borders. ABOUT THE PUBLICATION: This publication was produced within the framework of the EU Green Agriculture Initiative in Armenia (EU-GAIA) project, which is funded by the European Union (EU) and the Austrian Development Cooperation (ADC), and implemented by the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) and the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in Armenia. In the framework of the European Union-funded EU-GAIA project, the Austrian Development Agency (ADA) hereby agrees that the reader uses this manual solely for non-commercial purposes. Prepared by: EV Consulting CJSC © 2020 Austrian Development Agency. All rights reserved. Licensed to the European Union under conditions. Yerevan, 2020 3 CONTENTS LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 5 1. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 6 2. OVERVIEW OF DEVELOPMENT DYNAMICS OF AGRICULTURE IN ARMENIA AND GOVERNMENT PRIORITIES.....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Gender, Agriculture and Rural Development in Armenia Country Gender Assessment Series Country Gender Assessment
    GENDER, AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT IN ARMENIA COUNTRY GENDER ASSESSMENT SERIES COUNTRY GENDER ASSESSMENT Gender, agriculture and rural development in Armenia Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Budapest, 2017 The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO) concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO in preference to others of similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO. © FAO 2017 FAO encourages the use, reproduction and dissemination of material in this information product. Except where otherwise indicated, material may be copied, downloaded and copied for private study, research and teaching purposes, or for use in non-commercial products or services, provided that appropriate acknowledgement of FAO as the source and copyright holder is given and that FAO’s endorsement of users’ views, products or services is not implied in anyway. All requests for translation and adaptation rights, and for resale and other commercial use rights should be made via www.fao.org/contact-us/ licence-request or addressed to [email protected]. FAO information products are available on the FAO website (www.fao.org/ publications) and can be purchased through [email protected].
    [Show full text]
  • Ministerial Report 2007 - 2011
    REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA MINISTRY OF NATURE PROTECTION MINISTERIAL REPORT 2007 - 2011 YEREVAN 2011 2 REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA The 2007-2011 Ministerial Report was developed by the working group of the Ministry of Nature Protection of the Republic of Armenia. The 2007-2011 Ministerial Report was translated and published with financial assistance of the United Nations Development Programme in Armenia MINISTERIAL REPORT 2007-2011 3 CONTENTS Foreword of Mr. Aram Harutyunyan, Minister of Nature Protection of the Republic of Armenia ............................................................................ 4 Introduction ................................................................................................. 7 1. State Governance of the Environment. Mechanisms for Nature Protection ............................................................................................ 8 1.1 Legislation Regulating the Environmental Sector and Institutional Issues .......................................................................... 8 1.2 Economic Mechanisms ................................................................. 10 1.3 Awareness, Participation and Environmental Education .............. 22 1.3.1 Participation and Public Awareness .................................... 22 1.3.2 Environmental Education .................................................... 24 1.4 Environmental Monitoring ............................................................. 25 1.5 Inspection Control .........................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia
    SAMVEL AVETISYAN AGRICULTURE AND FOOD PROCESSING IN ARMENIA YEREVAN 2010 Dedicated to the memory of the author’s son, Sergey Avetisyan Approved for publication by the Scientifi c and Technical Council of the RA Ministry of Agriculture Peer Reviewers: Doctor of Economics, Prof. Ashot Bayadyan Candidate Doctor of Economics, Docent Sergey Meloyan Technical Editor: Doctor of Economics Hrachya Tspnetsyan Samvel S. Avetisyan Agriculture and Food Processing in Armenia – Limush Publishing House, Yerevan 2010 - 138 pages Photos courtesy CARD, Zaven Khachikyan, Hambardzum Hovhannisyan This book presents the current state and development opportunities of the Armenian agriculture. Special importance has been attached to the potential of agriculture, the agricultural reform process, accomplishments and problems. The author brings up particular facts in combination with historic data. Brief information is offered on leading agricultural and processing enterprises. The book can be a useful source for people interested in the agrarian sector of Armenia, specialists, and students. Publication of this book is made possible by the generous fi nancial support of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) and assistance of the “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. The contents do not necessarily represent the views of USDA, the U.S. Government or “Center for Agribusiness and Rural Development” Foundation. INTRODUCTION Food and Agriculture sector is one of the most important industries in Armenia’s economy. The role of the agrarian sector has been critical from the perspectives of the country’s economic development, food safety, and overcoming rural poverty. It is remarkable that still prior to the collapse of the Soviet Union, Armenia made unprecedented steps towards agrarian reforms.
    [Show full text]
  • Alireza Soleymanzadeh the Achaemenid Economic System and the Armenian-Georgian Situation
    ivane javaxiSvilis saxelobis Tbilisis saxelmwifo universitetis saqarTvelos istoriis institutis Sromebi. XIII Tbilisi. 2018 Alireza Soleymanzadeh Assistant Professor, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Iran The Achaemenid Economic System and the Armenian-Georgian Situation Introduction From time immemorial, the economy of the Armenia and Georgia has been based on agriculture, and commerce. The South Caucasus (except western Georgia) and other parts of the region are territories that correspond to the spread of the Kura-Araxes culture. The economy of the Kura-Araxes culture 1 was based on agriculture and cattle-breeding.0F Grain growing, understanding the make of flour and livestock-raising especially cattle, sheep, goats, and domestication of horses about 3300 BC happened in this culture. It is at the beginning of the 3rd millennium В.С. that the diffusion of the Kura–Araxes culture over a fairly wide area in the Transcaucasia is to be dated. Growth of agriculture, cattle-breeding and the general advance in economic conditions, contributing as they did to the growth of population, necessitated the bringing of 2 new land under cultivation.1F Scholars who have examined the economic issues of the Achaemenid Empire, have presented different ideas in this regard: some of them believe that the economic policies of the empire put deadly blows on the structures of wealthy satrapies such as Babylonia and brought them into recession. In their view, the main reason for this downturn was factors such as despotism, sovereignty, and the unreasonable involvement of the government in the economic system including the tax system and imposing heavy taxes or dues, 1 A.
    [Show full text]
  • The World of Organic Agriculture 2011: Summary 26 Helga Willer
    Forschungsinstitut für biologischen Landbau Institut de recherche de l’agriculture biologique Research Institute of Organic Agriculture EXCELLENCE F O R SUST AINABILIT Y FiBL AND IFOAM the World of organic agriculture statistics & emerging trends 2011 oceania 12.2 million ha europe 9.3 million ha latin america 8.6 million ha asia 3.6 million ha north america 2.7 million ha africa 1.0 million ha Supported by Training Manuals for Organic Agriculture for Organic Agriculture in the Arid and Semiarid Tropics E DIT E D B Y Gilles Weidmann, Lukas Kilcher, Salvador Garibay C OM P IL E D B Y The training manuals produced by IFOAM, Training Manual for Organic Agriculture in the FiBL, and partners from the organic movement Humid Tropics (242 pages and 199 slides) from tropical countries in Asia, Latin America, Training Manual for Organic Agriculture in the and Africa address both arid and semi-arid Arid and Semi-Arid Tropics (222 pages and 136 tropics and humid tropical climatic zones. slides) They contain case studies of successful organic farming systems and organic marketing initiatives and offer guidelines for the main subsistence and cash crops of the The International Federation of Organic tropics. Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) Charles-de-Gaulle-Str. 5 With informative text, transparencies, and 53113 Bonn didactic recommendations, the training Germany manuals provide an ideal resource for trainers www.ifoam.org that encourage individual adaptation and further development of need based material. The training manuals can be downloaded from Research Institute of Organic Agriculture the IFOAM and FiBL bookstores at (FiBL) (www.ifoam.org and shop.fibl.org).
    [Show full text]
  • Organic Agriculture in Armenia
    ASIA: COUNTRY REPORT ARMENIA Organic Agriculture in Armenia 1 NUNE DARBINYAN Recent important developments Organic agriculture is part of Armenia’s sustainable development concept and is a priority area in the government’s agro-food policy. Organic farming is considered an excellent busi- ness opportunity for farmers and investors involved in agriculture and food production. History The discussion on organic agriculture among stakeholders started in 2002, coordinated at the time by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). These activities have continued under an FAO2 and USAID3/DAI ASME4 project. As a result, the Armenian Or- ganic Agriculture Foundation was established as a platform. Several farmer associations included organic agriculture on their agendas and some of their members started to pro- duce organically. Donors supported organic agriculture via projects and now the sector continues to develop largely independent of foreign funds. Production data and operators In Armenia the demand from processing companies for organic raw materials is the main factor for the development on a farm level, since there are no subsidies for organic farming by the state. In 2009, there were 1’100 hectares of certified areas, 600 hectares were agri- cultural land. The remaining areas are for wild collection and areas under conversion. There are about 1'000 beehives. The production of fruits, berries, alfalfa, some grains, vegetables, and collection of wild species as well as beekeeping are the main organic agricultural activities. Further processing is based on the above mentioned raw materials. The main final products are juices, nectars, concentrates, purees, quick frozen products, and bread. Organic animal husbandry is seen as having high potential and is therefore high on the list of priorities for Armenian agricul- ture in state policies.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity Analysis Update for Armenia Final Report Prosperity, Livelihoods and Conserving Ecosystems (Place) Iqc Task Order #4
    BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA FINAL REPORT PROSPERITY, LIVELIHOODS AND CONSERVING ECOSYSTEMS (PLACE) IQC TASK ORDER #4 February 2009 This publication was produced for review by the United States Agency for International Development. It was prepared by the Armenia Biodiversity Update Team of ECODIT. ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-04-06-00010-00; Task Order #04 AUTHORITY Prepared for USAID/Armenia under Prosperity, Livelihoods and Conserving Ecosystems (PLACE) Indefinite Quantity Contract number EPP-I-04-06-00010-00, Task Order #04 awarded 14 November 2008, entitled Biodiversity Analysis Update for Armenia (“Armenia Biodiversity Update”). This “Armenia Biodiversity Update” was completed in reference to the task order. The views expressed and opinions contained in this report are those of the Armenia Biodiversity Assessment Team and are not intended as statements of policy of either USAID or the contractor. PREPARED BY: ARMENIA BIODIVERSITY UPDATE TEAM ASSEMBLED BY ECODIT, INC. ECODIT, Inc. 1800 N. Kent Street, Suite 1260 Arlington, VA 22209 USA Tel: +1 703 841 1883 Fax: +1 703 841 1885 Web: www.ecodit.com BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA – FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 17, 2009 ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-04-06-00010-00; Task Order #04 BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA FINAL REPORT PROSPERITY, LIVELIHOODS AND CONSERVING ECOSYSTEMS (PLACE) IQC TASK ORDER #4 DISCLAIMER The authors’ views expressed in this publication do not necessarily reflect the views of the United States Agency for International Development or the United States Government. BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA – FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 17, 2009 ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-04-06-00010-00; Task Order #04 [this page intentionally blank] BIODIVERSITY ANALYSIS UPDATE FOR ARMENIA – FINAL REPORT FEBRUARY 17, 2009 ECODIT Contract #EPP-I-04-06-00010-00; Task Order #04 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY his Biodiversity Analysis update responds to requirements of Section 119(d) of the FAA of 1961 (as T amended) and ADS 201.3.8.2 regarding biodiversity analysis for country strategic plans.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Agriculture and Vegetal Food Economy of Kura-Araxes Culture in the South Caucasus 71 PART À TIRÉS
    PART À ON thE AGRICULTURE AND VEGETAL FOOD TIRÉS - ECONOMY OF KURA-ARAXES CULTURE IN thE OUth AUCASUS S C ÉDITIONS CNRS R. HOVSEPYAN • PART À Abstract: Agriculture dependent almost exclusively on cereal cultivation was practiced in the South Caucasus, beginning with the Kura-Araxes culture and continued for more than two and a half millennia (from the Early Bronze Age to the Early Iron Age). Although TIRÉS several dozen Early Bronze Age sites were investigated, extremely few or no remains of cultivated pulses or oil-crops were found. Global - environmental changes at the beginning of the Early Bronze Age may have contribute in transforming the agriculture of the South Caucasus into cultivation of a few hardy cereals. But it seems more likely that anthropogenic factors played the decisive role, because pulses and oil-plants could have been grown along with cereals in the same conditions in foothills and plains, but they were not. Résumé L’agriculture de la culture Kura-Araxe constitua la première phase d’une période de plus de 2500 ans (du Bronze ancien au : ÉDITIONS Fer ancien) où les cultures étaient caractérisées par une prédominance et parfois même une présence exclusive de céréales. Bien que plusieurs douzaines de sites du Bronze ancien aient été étudiés, très peu de restes (et parfois aucun reste) de plantes oléagineuses et de CNRS légumineuses cultivées ont été retrouvés. Les changements environnementaux globaux qui se sont produits au début du Bronze ancien • ont sans doute joué un rôle majeur dans la transformation de l’agriculture dans le sud du Caucase vers une forme spécialisée dans la culture de quelques céréales résistantes.
    [Show full text]
  • Foreign Direct Investment Sector Scan
    Public Disclosure Authorized Foreign Direct Investment Sector Scan Public Disclosure Authorized Agribusiness in Armenia Public Disclosure Authorized Public Disclosure Authorized IN PARTNERSHIP WITH Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 4 1.1. FDI motivation 5 1.2. FDI trends in Armenia 6 1.3. FDI in agriculture (agribusiness) 9 1.4. International trends and implications for Armenia’s investment prospects 10 2. INVESTOR TARGETING 14 2.1. Sector scan – a tool for identification of competitive agricultural subsectors for FDI 15 2.2. Identification of competitive agricultural subsectors 16 3. SECTOR SCAN RESULTS 19 3.1. Aquaculture sector 19 3.2. Dairy sector 26 3.3. Floriculture 31 3.4. Fruits & vegetables production 36 3.5. Animal sector inputs 45 3.6. Fruits & vegetables sector inputs 47 3.7. Overall sector scan results 51 3.8. Sector linked investment impediments 53 3.9. General investment climate impediments 53 4. CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS 55 4.1. Greenfield investment in niche subsectors and joint ventures most likely sources of FDI 55 4.2. Institutional arrangements and the role of DFA 56 4.3. Recommendations summary 57 5. ANNEX 60 a. Annex 1 / FDI Terminology and Principles 60 b. Annex 2 / Illustrative example of an action plan for a sector based investment outreach program: 62 c. Annex 3 / A full list of experts and private sector representatives interviewed 63 2 TABLE OF FIGURES Figure 1 FDI Flows (in mil US$) ............................................................................................................................ 6 Figure 2 FDI, net inflows (% of GDP) ................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 3 Number of announced new greenfield FDI projects ............................................................................. 7 Figure 4 Greenfield FDI by number of projects in Armenia (Jan 2003 to Nov 2016) .........................................
    [Show full text]
  • The-Caucasus.Pdf
    THE CAUCASUS The Caucasus is one of the most complicated regions in the world: with many dif- ferent peoples and political units, differing religious allegiances, frequent conflicts, and where historically major world powers have clashed with each other on many occasions. Until now there has been no comprehensive introductory book for those wishing to learn about this complex region. This book fills the gap, providing a clear, comprehensive introduction to the Caucasus, which is suitable for all readers. It covers the geography; the historical development of the region; economics; poli- tics and government; population; religion and society; culture and traditions; along- side its conflicts and international relations. Written throughout in an accessible style, it requires no prior knowledge of the Caucasus. The book will be invaluable for those researching specific issues, as well as for readers needing a thorough introduction to the region. Frederik Coene is currently Attaché dealing with post-conflict assistance in the Delegation of the European Commission to Georgia. His research on the Caucasus began in 1999 during his internship in the Private Office of the Secretary-General at NATO Headquarters. Since then he has researched, worked and travelled in all parts of the Caucasus. ROUTLEDGE CONTEMPORARY RUSSIA AND EASTERN EUROPE SERIES 1 LIBERAL NATIONALISM IN CENTRAL EUROPE Stefan Auer 2 CIVIL–MILITARY RELATIONS IN RUSSIA AND EASTERN EUROPE David J. Betz 3 THE EXTREME NATIONALIST THREAT IN RUSSIA The growing influence of Western rightist
    [Show full text]
  • The Status and Potential of Organic Agriculture in Armenia
    The Status and Potential of Organic Agriculture in Armenia A background document for the Greening Economies in the Eastern Neighbourhood (EaP-GREEN) partnership programme Photo: Flickr/Creative Commons/ogannes Table of contents Foreword 3 Abbreviations 4 Executive Summary 5 Introduction 6 Armenia’s agricultural sector 6 Government policy for agriculture and rural development 9 Markets and trade 9 Sanitary and phytosanitary requirements for exports 12 The organic sector 13 Types of organic products 13 Education and training 15 Investment and support 16 Government involvement in the organic sector 16 Organic standards 17 Markets and trade in organic agriculture 18 Export market 18 Domestic market 19 Organic agriculture and the Green Economy 19 Challenges for organic farming 21 Barriers to production 21 Barriers to market development 21 Tariff and non-tariff barriers for exports of organic products 22 Conclusion 24 Bibliography 25 Further reading 26 The Status and Potential of Organic Agriculture in Armenia 2 Foreword This report was prepared by Nune Darbinyan and Gunnar Rundgren for the Greening Economies in the Eastern Neighbourhood Organic Agriculture (EaP-GREEN) project. It was revised and updated by Alex Leshchynskyy. Verena Balke from UN Environment reviewed and edited the final draft. The report was originally produced in 2011, as background material for the UN Environment publication “Organic Agriculture – A step towards the Green Economy in the Eastern Europe, Caucasus and Central Asia region”. In this edition, data and sections on marketing, standards and certification have been updated; new sections on trade barriers have been added; and the overall report has been condensed. The responsibility for the content of this report remains fully with the authors.
    [Show full text]