DOCSLIB.ORG

Drivers of Forest Change in the Greater Mekong Subregion Cambodia Country Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Drivers of Forest Change in the Greater Mekong Subregion Cambodia Country Report Drivers of Forest Change in the Greater Mekong Subregion Cambodia Country Report USAID Lowering Emissions in Asia’s Forests (USAID LEAF) Drivers of Deforestation in the Greater Mekong Subregion Cambodia Country Report Chhun Delux September 2015 i The USAID Lowering Emissions in Asia’s Forests (USAID LEAF) Program is a five-year regional project (2011-2016) focused on achieving meaningful and sustainable reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the forest-land use sector across six target countries: Thailand, Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea. ii Contents 1 OVERVIEW OF TRENDS IN FOREST AND LAND USE SECTOR .................................... 1 1.1 HISTORICAL DRIVERS OF DEFORESTATION AND FOREST DEGRADATION IN CAMBODIA ........................ 1 1.2 CAMBODIA LAND USE AND FORESTRY .................................................................................................. 1 1.3 FORESTLAND MANAGEMENT, AND INSTITUTION .................................................................................... 2 2 DRIVERS OF DEFORESTATION AND DEGRADATION ................................................... 3 2.1 CONVERSION FOREST TO LARGE SCALE AGRO-CROPPING AND MINING ................................................... 3 2.1.1 Large scale economic land concession (ELC under 10,000 ha) ....................................................... 3 2.1.2 Economic land concession (ELC under 1,000 ha) ............................................................................ 4 2.1.3 Mining concession ............................................................................................................................ 4 2.2 CONVERSION FOREST TO SETTLEMENT AND FARMLAND ........................................................................ 5 2.2.1 Social Land Concession (SLC) ......................................................................................................... 5 2.2.2 Conversion forest to settlement and farmland through Government Directive 001 policy ............... 6 2.2.3 Illegal forestland conversion/illegal forestland speculation at household scale .............................. 7 2.3 CONVERSION OF FOREST TO LARGE SCALE INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT ........................................ 7 2.3.1 Hydropower dam construction and electricity consumption ............................................................ 7 2.3.2 Road construction ............................................................................................................................. 8 2.4 DRIVERS OF FOREST DEGRADATION ...................................................................................................... 8 2.4.1 Forest Concession and local coup/annul coup ................................................................................. 8 2.4.2 Illegal Logging .................................................................................................................................. 9 2.4.3 Fuel wood harvesting........................................................................................................................ 9 2.4.4 Forest fire ....................................................................................................................................... 10 3 DRIVERS OF SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT, FOREST CONSERVATION, AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION ............................................................................... 10 3.1 REFORESTATION AND AFFORESTATION ............................................................................................... 10 3.1.1 Promote participatory forest management ..................................................................................... 11 3.1.2 Certificate forestry and trade.......................................................................................................... 12 3.1.3 Increase forest values through REDD+ implementation ................................................................ 12 3.2 UNDERLYING CAUSES OF DEFORESTATION, FOREST DEGRADATION, SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT, FOREST CONSERVATION, AFFORESTATION AND REFORESTATION .............................................. 13 3.2.1 Limited governance in forest sector and land use sector ................................................................ 13 3.2.2 Rural Poverty .................................................................................................................................. 13 3.2.3 Regional and Global demand for Timber ....................................................................................... 13 3.2.4 Improper farming and migration .................................................................................................... 14 3.2.5 Lack of long term finance to support forest sector ......................................................................... 15 3.2.6 Lack of human resource in forestry sector...................................................................................... 15 3.3 ACTORS INFLUENCING DRIVERS OF DEFORESTATION, FOREST DEGRADATION, SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT AND FOREST CONSERVATION, AFFORESTATION, AND REFORESTATION ...................................... 16 3.3.1 Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fishery (MAFF) .................................................................. 16 3.3.2 Ministry of Environment (MoE) ...................................................................................................... 16 3.3.3 Ministry of Commerce (MoC) ......................................................................................................... 16 3.3.4 Ministry of Land Management Urban Planning and Construction (MLMUPC) ............................ 17 3.3.5 Ministry of Mining and Energy (MME) .......................................................................................... 17 3.3.6 Anti-corruption unit ........................................................................................................................ 17 4 POLICIES AND MEASURES TO ADDRESS DEFORESTATION AND FOREST DEGRADATION AND EXIST SFM AND REHABILITATION .................................................. 17 4.1 NATIONAL FOREST PROGRAM/FORESTRY LAW (2002) ........................................................................ 18 iii 4.1.1 Protection Forest ............................................................................................................................ 18 4.1.2 Community Forestry Program ........................................................................................................ 18 4.1.3 National PA strategic management plan ........................................................................................ 19 4.1.4 Land Law (2000) ............................................................................................................................. 19 4.1.5 Fishery strategic management plan ................................................................................................ 19 4.1.6 Cambodia REDD+ Roadmap ......................................................................................................... 19 4.1.7 Other government policy ................................................................................................................ 19 5 ANALYSIS .................................................................................................................................. 20 5.1 TRENDS DRIVING DEFORESTATION AND FOREST DEGRADATION ........................................................... 20 5.2 TREND DRIVING SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT, REFORESTATION, AND AFFORESTATION .......... 21 5.3 GAP ANALYSIS OF EXISTING DATA ON DRIVERS OF DEFORESTATION, FOREST DEGRADATION, SUSTAINABLE FOREST MANAGEMENT, REFORESTATION, AND AFFORESTATION ................................................. 21 5.4 PROPOSED NEW PAMS TO ADDRESS DEFORESTATION AND FOREST DEGRADATION ............................. 22 REFERENCES .................................................................................................................................... 24 ANNEX 1: PROTECTED FORESTS, CONSERVATION SITES AND FOREST RESEARCH STATIONS .......................................................................................................................................... 25 ANNEX 2: ELCS GRANTED INSIDE PROTECTED AREA (PA) .............................................. 27 iv 1 Overview of trends in forest and land use sector 1.1 Historical Drivers of Deforestation and Forest Degradation in Cambodia Cambodian has many high value forest areas and contains the largest remaining forest habitat, with 80% of the most of the most valuable and endangered indigenous tree species in the region. However the country also has experience significant forest and biodiversity loss in recent years.1 Before the 1970s, Cambodia’s forest area remained relatively constant. Since the 1970s, forest area began to decline due to effects of the Vietnam War, as Cambodia suffered from the unstable political situations and unstable logging in the area (Tetsuya et al, 2013). Starting in the 1990s, as a result of rapid economic growth and fragile environmental regulations, 60% of the country was leased to private timber industry, which led to widespread deforestation and forest degradation.2 Land speculation driven by high prices has also contributed to accelerated forest clearing in recent years.3 In particular, economic land concessions for production of rubber, sugar cane, cassava and more recently biofuel crops have led to substantial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Giants on Our Hands
    GIANTS ON OUR HANDS PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON THE DOMESTICATED ASIAN ELEPHANT The designations and the presentation of material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its frontiers or boundaries. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors alone and do not imply any opinion whatsoever on the part of FAO. The photo credits given below are by page number in order of appearance. Copyright in all cases remains with the photographers, to whom FAO wishes to extend its thanks for their generous permission to reproduce their work. Masakazu Kashio: Cover page, iii, 14 (lower), 102, 156, 172 Makoto Komoda: ix, 14 (upper), 16 Sawai Wanghongsa: 34 Richard Lair: 66 Sam Fang: 78, 182 Jacob V. Cheeran: 222 Asian Elephant Foundation of Thailand: 230 Thai Animal Guardians Association: 238 Edited by: Iljas Baker and Masakazu Kashio ISBN: 974-90757-1-4 FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific, 2002 Printed by: Dharmasarn Co., Ltd. For copies write to: Forest Resources Officer FAO Regional Office for Asia and the Pacific Maliwan Mansion Phra Atit Road, Bangkok 10200 Thailand E-mail: [email protected] ii A royal white elephant of Thailand iii Foreword The Asian elephant has played an important role in the cultural, economic and social life of Asia for millennia. However, it has been increasingly marginalized in the region and, apart from Myanmar, there is now little demand for the traditional work done by elephants.
    [Show full text]
  • National Protected Area Strategic Management Plan 2017-2031
    Kingdom of Cambodia Nation Religion King Royal Government of Cambodia National Protected Area Strategic Management Plan 2017-2031 Ministry of Environment 2017 Samdech Akka Moha Sena Padei Techo HUN SEN Prime Minister of the Kingdom of Cambodia MESSAGE Protected areas play a critical role in conserving biodiversity and promoting sustainable development. The world’s agricultural systems depend upon biodiversity to sustain genetic plant and animal diversity, to provide pollination services, and to maintain irrigation services. Urban cities depend upon biodiversity to provide clean drinking water to their growing populations. Coastal communities depend upon the natural infrastructure of coral reefs, sea grass beds, and mangroves to buffer them from the impacts of climate change, including sea-level rise and increased storm surges. Rural communities depend upon the natural infrastructure of forests, grasslands and wetlands to buffer them against increased drought, flooding, disease and natural disasters. While protected areas provide the fundamental goods and services upon which all life depends, it is particularly important to the most vulnerable groups of our society. In Cambodia, indigenous ethnic groups and remote rural communities depend critically upon biodiversity to provide them with basic necessities such as food, water, shelter, medicine and their livelihoods. As nations begin to plan for a green growth and climate-resilient future, they will be looking for ways to find innovative solutions to meet both their social development needs and their biodiversity conservation goals. Protected areas represent one of the most efficient and effective strategies available for addressing the global challenges of alleviating poverty, while adapting to and mitigating climate change, and maintaining key ecosystem services.
    [Show full text]
  • Timber Takeaway V1.8
    Recommendations contained on page 1 Chainsaws speak louder than words A Briefing Document by Global Witness. May 2000 Recommendations 1. RECOMMENDATIONS G Stop the practice of granting cutting permits by any authority other than the Department of Forestry and The meeting of the Consultative Group (CG) in Paris in Wildlife. Permits granted in this way to Pheapimex May 2000 is of crucial importance to forestry reform in and Mieng Ly Heng should be withdrawn. Cambodia. The 1999 CG meeting set the pace for forestry G reform, but it is the 2000 meeting that can ensure that the Adopt the new forestry law as soon as possible, momentum of reform is continued. The concession review following meaningful public consultation. and the logging crackdown will count for nothing if they G Urgently address the issue of domestic timber supply, are not brought to their logical conclusions. as the current system stimulates illegal logging. G The Royal Government of Cambodia (RGC) should: Complete an inventory and impound all old logs, and set up a working group to determine the best use of G Immediately impose a moratorium on all concession these old logs. activity, until all the recommendations made by the G Consider the importance of the proposed Cardamom World Bank funded Forest Policy Reform Project mountain protected area as a reserve of regional and (FPRP) and the Asian Development Bank (ADB) world significance, and impose a moratorium on all funded concession review are implemented. concession activity in the Cardamoms. G Terminate all concessions that possess less than ten years of operable forest, and impose a moratorium on Cambodia’s neighbours: all concessions with less than 15 years of operable G The governments of Thailand, Laos and Vietnam forest, as described in table 6 of the ADB draft report.
    [Show full text]
  • The Status and Conservation of Hornbills in Cambodia
    Bird Conservation International (2004) 14:S5–S11. BirdLife International 2004 doi:10.1017/S0959270905000183 Printed in the United Kingdom The status and conservation of hornbills in Cambodia TAN SETHA Summary Internal security problems from the 1960s up until 1998 prevented any fieldwork in Cambodia. Since then, the situation has improved greatly and the Royal Government of Cambodia, in collaboration with international conservation NGOs, has been conducting general biological surveys across the country. Survey reports were used to investigate current occurrence of hornbills. Historically, three hornbill species — Great Hornbill Buceros bicornis, Wreathed Hornbill Aceros undulatus and Oriental Pied Hornbill Anthraco- ceros albirostris — were known from Cambodia. Recent surveys show that populations of Great and Wreathed Hornbills have declined significantly since the 1960s, while Oriental Pied is still common. A fourth hornbill species, Brown Hornbill Anorrhinus tickelli, was reported in 1998 in Kirirom National Park spanning the border of Koh Kong and Kompong Speu provinces in south-west Cambodia. Conservation priorities and priorities for future surveys are being developed. Introduction Until recently, only three hornbill species were known to occur in Cambodia: Great Hornbill Buceros bicornis, Wreathed Hornbill Aceros undulatus, and Oriental Pied Hornbill Anthracoceros albirostris (Thomas 1964). Two recent records have added Brown Hornbill Anorrhinus tickelli (ssp. austeni). Chak (1998) erroneously stated that eight species had been recorded. It is very unlikely that more than four hornbill species occur in the country. Internal security problems from the 1960s up until 1998 prevented any fieldwork in the country. However, since then the situation has improved greatly and the Royal Government of Cambodia, in collaboration with international conservation NGOs, has been conducting biological surveys across the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Conservation Project
    MAFF/MoE/WCS/WWF CAMBODIAN TIGER CONSERVATION PROJECT Funded by: Save the Tiger Fund A special project of the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation in partnership with the ExxonMobil Corporation Reporting by: Wildlife Conservation Society (WCS) Cambodia Program September 2002 Executive Summary • WCS and WWF, in cooperation with the Ministries of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) and the Environment (MoE), began implementing conservation activities for the Tiger Panthera tigris in Cambodia in 1999. • Supported by, among others, Save The Tiger Fund, activities began with a needs assessment. Lack of technical and physical capacity of government staff and an almost complete lack of quality field data were identified as the main areas to focus efforts. • To date, the project has held three formal training courses within Cambodia and helped send three Government staff members to two international training courses. Over 40 MoE and MAFF staff from both the National and Provincial level have received training, along with staff from five Protected Areas. • The first Khmer language training manual for field surveys and wildlife management has been produced. The comprehensive 90-page book is now freely available to all Government and NGO staff. • Nine surveys were undertaken throughout Cambodia, covering an area of approximately 13,000 km2 and employing over 30 people and 70 camera-traps, accumulating more than 11,000 camera-trap nights. Although Tigers were confirmed on six of the nine surveys, all areas contain depressed populations, some of which are unlikely to be viable in the long-term. • After the first year of survey work, the critical status of Tigers throughout the country became clear.
    [Show full text]
  • Drivers of Forest Change in the Greater Mekong Subregion Cambodia Country Report
    Drivers of Forest Change in the Greater Mekong Subregion Cambodia Country Report USAID Lowering Emissions in Asia’s Forests (USAID LEAF) Drivers of Deforestation in the Greater Mekong Subregion Cambodia Country Report Chhun Delux September 2015 i The USAID Lowering Emissions in Asia’s Forests (USAID LEAF) Program is a five-year regional project (2011-2016) focused on achieving meaningful and sustainable reductions in greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions from the forest-land use sector across six target countries: Thailand, Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia, Malaysia and Papua New Guinea. The designations employed and the presentation of material in this information product do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), or of the USAID Lowering Emissions in Asia’s Forests (USAID LEAF) Program concerning the legal or development status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The mention of specific companies or products of manufacturers, whether or not these have been patented or trademarked, does not imply that these have been endorsed or recommended by FAO or USAID LEAF in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. The views expressed in this information product are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of FAO or USAID LEAF or its Board of Governors, or the governments it represents. Neither FAO nor USAID LEAF guarantees the accuracy of the data included in this publication and accepts no responsibility for any consequence of their use.
    [Show full text]
  • Abundance of Primates Reveals Samkos Wildlife Sanctuary, Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia As a Priority Area for Conservation C
    Abundance of primates reveals Samkos Wildlife Sanctuary, Cardamom Mountains, Cambodia as a priority area for conservation C. N. Z. Coudrat,L.D.Rogers and K. A. I. Nekaris Abstract We conducted a primate survey in Samkos Wild- are reported to occur in the Cardamom Mountains (Table 1; life Sanctuary, western Cambodia, during the wet season in Long & Swan, 2000). In Samkos Wildlife Sanctuary the 2009. We visually confirmed the presence of five out of six pileated gibbon Hylobates pileatus, with an estimated 3,100 primate species thought to occur in the area: Bengal slow groups, is the only species that has been studied in detail loris Nycticebus bengalensis, Indochinese silvered langur (Traeholt et al., 2005). Simulations predict a dramatic decline Trachypithecus germaini, pileated gibbon Hylobates pileatus, of the population in the Sanctuary in the next 40–50 years pig-tailed macaque Macaca leonina and long-tailed macaque because of habitat loss from illegal logging (Traeholt et al., Macaca fascicularis. We did not find any sign of the stump- 2005). In developing countries such as Cambodia infrastruc- tailed macaque Macaca arctoides and suggest it is absent in ture expansion and logging are major threats to forests and Samkos Wildlife Sanctuary and possibly from the Cardamom wildlife (Smith, 2001). We therefore carried out the first Mountains. We provide the abundance measures for each survey of all primate species in the Sanctuary since 2000, primate species; the three most abundant species were Bengal reporting novel data on their abundance in the rainy season. slow loris, Indochinese silvered langur and pileated gibbon. Because the distribution of primate species in Cambodia is We propose Samkos Wildlife Sanctuary as a priority for still poorly known we also provide a review of their primate conservation in Cambodia.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodian Journal of Natural History
    Cambodian Journal of Natural History Cambodia’s biodiversity revealed A new primate for Cambodia Amphibians and reptiles of the Cardamoms The Protected Area Law September 2008 Vol 2008 No. 1 Cambodian Journal of Natural History Editors E-mail: [email protected] • Dr Jenny C. Daltry, Senior Conservation Biologist, Fauna & Flora International. • Dr Carl Traeholt, Co-ordinator, Malay Tapir Conservation Project, and Chief Lecturer in Biodiversity Conserva- tion, Centre for Biodiversity Conservation. • Callum McCulloch, Co-ordinator, Centre for Biodiversity Conservation. International Editorial Board • Dr Stephen J. Browne, Fauna & Flora • Dr Sovanmoly Hul, Muséum National d’Histoire International, Cambridge, UK. Naturelle, Paris, France. • Dr Martin Fisher, Editor of Oryx – The • Dr Andy L. Maxwell, World Wide Fund for International Journal of Conservation. Nature, Cambodia. • Dr L. Lee Grismer, La Sierra University, • Dr Jörg Menzel, University of Bonn, Germany. California, USA. • Dr Brad Pettitt, Murdoch University, Australia. • Dr Knud E. Heller, Nykøbing Falster Zoo, • Dr Campbell O. Webb, Harvard University Denmark. Herbaria, USA. Other peer reviewers for this volume. The editors gratefully acknowledge the following experts for review- ing mansucripts submitted to this journal: • Mike R. Appleton, Tarn-et-Garonne, France. • Richard G.T. Paley, Cambridge, UK. • Dr Herbert H. Covert, Colorado, USA. • Dr Bryan L. Stuart., North Carolina, USA • Dr Will J. Duckworth, Lao PDR. • Robert J. Timmins, Wisconsin, USA. The Cambodian Journal of Natural History is a free journal published by the Centre for Biodiversity Conser- vation at the Royal University of Phnom Penh. The Centre for Biodiversity Conservation is a non-profit making unit dedicated to training Cambodian biologists and to the study and conservation of Cambodian biodiversity.
    [Show full text]
  • Resource Credibility.Pdf
    Recommendations contained on page 1 The Credibility Gap – and the Need to Bridge it Increasing the pace of forestry reform A Briefing Document by Global Witness. May 2001 Recommendations 1. RECOMMENDATIONS G Inform all concessionaires that they will be held responsible for the actions of all their employees, The Royal Government of Cambodia should use the and those of their sub contractors and sub opportunity that the June 2001 Consultative Group contractors’ employees. This should include not Meeting (CG) in Tokyo provides to restate its only include actions related directly to concession commitment to forestry reform in Cambodia. operations but also conduct during discussions with Demonstrable progress in the areas highlighted in these local people. recommendations could be used as a measure of this G commitment, and of the rate of reform. Penalise concessionaires that refuse to give the Department of Forestry and Wildlife (DFW) and/or The Royal Government of Cambodia should: the Independent Monitor immediate access to concessions, log rest areas and processing facilities G Ensure that politicians and government officials to carry out inspections. declare all financial/familial links to the forestry G Ensure that the new concession agreements industry, if any. recognise the right of the DFW and the G Encourage transparency in relevant government Independent Monitor to have immediate access to departments and ministries. concessions, log rest areas and processing facilities G Increase the involvement of the Ministry of the to carry out unannounced inspections. This should Environment (MoE) in forestry reform. include penalties for non-compliance. G Ensure that officials within the Ministry of G Notify all concessionaires of the customary right of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries (MAFF) and the local people to collect resin and prohibit the further MoE efficiently detect, investigate and suppress cutting of resin trees by concessionaires.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambodian Journal of Natural History
    Cambodian Journal of Natural History Botum-Sakor bird survey Resin tapping Green peafowl status Community conservation incentives November 2009 Vol 2009 No. 1 Cambodian Journal of Natural History Editors Email [email protected] • Dr Jenny C. Daltry, Senior Conservation Biologist, Fauna & Flora International. • Dr Carl Traeholt, Co-ordinator, Malay Tapir Conservation Project, and Chief Lecturer in Biodiversity Conserva- tion, Centre for Biodiversity Conservation. • Callum McCulloch, Co-ordinator, Centre for Biodiversity Conservation. International Editorial Board • Dr Stephen J. Browne, Fauna & Flora • Dr Sovanmoly Hul, Muséum National d’Histoire International, Cambridge, UK. Naturelle, Paris, France. • Dr Martin Fisher, Editor of Oryx – The • Dr Andy L. Maxwell, World Wide Fund for International Journal of Conservation. Nature, Cambodia. • Dr L. Lee Grismer, La Sierra University, • Dr Jörg Menzel , University of Bonn, Germany. California, USA. • Dr Brad Pe i , Murdoch University, Australia. • Dr Knud E. Heller , Nykøbing Falster Zoo, • Dr Campbell O. Webb , Harvard University Denmark. Herbaria, USA. Other peer reviewers for this volume . The editors gratefully acknowledge the following experts for review- ing mansucripts submi ed to this journal: • Dr Nick Brickle, Wildlife Conservation Society, • Jeremy Holden, Freelance photographer and Indonesia. biologist, Cambodia. • Dr Tom Evans, Wildlife Conservation Society, • Ma hew Maltby, FFI, Cambodia. Cambodia. • Dr Sarah Milne, Cambridge University, UK. • Dr Neil Furey, Fauna & Flora International (FFI), • Oum Sony, FFI, Cambodia. Cambodia. • Emily Woodfi eld, FFI, Cambodia. • Frédéric Goes, Cambodia Bird News, France. We thank three additional reviewers who chose to remain anonymous. The Cambodian Journal of Natural History is a free journal published by the Centre for Biodiversity Conser- vation at the Royal University of Phnom Penh.
    [Show full text]
  • A Wildlife Survey of Southern Mondulkiri Province, Cambodia
    A WILDLIFE SURVEY OF SOUTHERN MONDULKIRI PROVINCE, CAMBODIA Joe Walston Pete Davidson Men Soriyun THE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY CAMBODIA PROGRAM WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY / CAMBODIA PROGRAM A WILDLIFE SURVEY OF SOUTHERN MONDULKIRI PROVINCE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY / CAMBODIA PROGRAM Table of Contents Executive summary (Khmer) Results Habitats Birds Mammals Threats Conservation recommendations Short-Term Short-Term Research Recommendations Medium-Term Executive summary Results Habitats Birds Mammals Threats Conservation recommendations Short-Term Short-Term Research Recommendations Medium-Term Acknowledgements Abbreviations Conventions Definitions of conventions in key species Global Threat Categories Thai Threat Status (Birds only) Lao Threat Status CITES Trade Categories Further Conventions A WILDLIFE SURVEY OF SOUTHERN MONDULKIRI PROVINCE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY / CAMBODIA PROGRAM PART I. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1.1.1 Previous surveys 1.2 Survey aim and objectives 1.2.1 Participants 1.3 Survey area 1.3.1 Study Areas and Survey Routes PART II. RESULTS 2.1 Habitats 2.1.1 Introduction 2.1.2 Global and Regional Importance of the Area 2.1.3 Summary Descriptions of the Main Habitat Types Evergreen and semi-evergreen forests Deciduous dipterocarp forests 2.1.4 Habitats within the Survey Area’s Sectors Coupes 2a and 3 Coupes 4 and 5 Snoul Wildlife Sanctuary Sen Monorom Plateau 2.2 Birds 2.2.1 Survey Description Survey Aim Survey Objectives Survey timing and summary itinerary 2.2.2 Methods 2.2.3 Results Key Species Accounts Globally Threatened & Globally Near-threatened Species Regionally Threatened Species Additional Regionally Sensitive Species Other Records of Significance 2.3 Mammals 2.3.1 Survey Description Survey Aim Survey Objectives Survey timing and summary itinerary 2.3.2 Methods 2.3.3 Results A WILDLIFE SURVEY OF SOUTHERN MONDULKIRI PROVINCE WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY / CAMBODIA PROGRAM Key Species Accounts Other records Species of significance not encountered on the survey PART III.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Text of Gibbon Pop Survey Report:Layout 1.Qxd
    nPnmPihWllf Sanctuary Wildlife Prich Phnom in of Conservation and Status 2009 Gray Tom and Channa Phan oacsGabriellae Nomascus WWF Greater Mekong-Cambodia Country Programme W P Gibbon The status and habitat of Yellow-cheeked Crested The of andhabitat status Yellow-cheeked i h l d n Nomascus gabriellae, l i o f e m S a Phan Channa and Tom Gray Tom Phan Channa and n P c Mondulkiri r t i u c a r h y WWF GREATER MEKONG - CAMBODIA COUNTRY PROGRAMME Contents Abstract Introduction 1 Study area 4 Methods 6 Listening posts 6 Survey design 6 Survey timing and methodology 7 Data Analysis 8 Field surveys within Lomphat Wildlife Sanctuary and Prey Khieu 9 Results 9 Population size of yellow-cheeked crested gibbon in Phnom Prich Wildlife Sanctuary 9 Distribution of yellow-cheeked crested gibbon in Phnom Prich Wildlife Sanctuary 10 Status of yellow-cheeked crested gibbon within Lomphat Wildlife Sanctuary and Prey Khieu 10 Discussion 13 Limitation of current survey 13 Habitat preferences of yellow-cheeked crested gibbon in Phnom Prich Wildlife Sanctuary 15 Threats to yellow-cheeked crested gibbon in Phnom Prich Wildlife Sanctuary 16 Recommendations 18 Research and monitoring 18 Protection and enforcement 18 Conclusions 19 Acknowledgements 20 References 21 STATUS AND CONSERVATION OF NOMASCUS GABRIELLAE IN PHNOM PRICH WILDLIFE SANCTUARY WWF GREATER MEKONG - CAMBODIA COUNTRY PROGRAMME List of figures Figure 1) Protected Areas within the Eastern Plains Landscape of Cambodia. 3 Figure 2) Distribution of evergreen and semi-evergreen forest and locations of surveyed gibbon listening posts within Phnom Prich Wildlife Sanctuary. Note seven listening posts in Sre Khitong range not analysed for population estimates are not indicated 5 Figure 3) a) Training of Ministry of Environment rangers and b) ranger team recording data at a listening post.
    [Show full text]