48402-001: National Motorway M-4 Gojra–Shorkot Section Project

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

48402-001: National Motorway M-4 Gojra–Shorkot Section Project Environmental Monitoring Report Semi-annual Report (January – June 2018) 31 July 2018 PAK: National Motorway M-4 Gojra–Shorkot Project Prepared by Renardet S.A, Geneva, Switzerland, External Monitoring Agent (EMA) for the National Highway Authority, Ministry of Communications, Government of Pakistan and the Asian Development Bank. CURRENCY EQUIVALENTS (as of 20 August 2018) Currency unit – Pakistani rupee/s (PRs) PRs1.00 = $0.00808 $1.00 = PRs 123.755 ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank BMP - Best Management Practices BBS - Behavior Based Safety CAPA - Corrective and Preventive actions CBOs - Community Based Organizations CO - Carbon monoxide dB - deci Bell DCP - Dry Chemical Powder DPO - District Police Officer DTR - Daily Time Register EC - European Community EIA - Environmental Impact Assessment EMP - Environmental Management Plan EPA - Environmental Protection Agency HSE - Health, Safety and Environment Leq - Loudness equivalent ND - Not detectable NEQS - National Environmental Quality Standards NHA - National Highway Authority NOTE (i) In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. This semi-annual environment monitoring report is a document of the borrower. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent those of ADB's Board of Directors, Management, or staff, and may be preliminary in nature. In preparing any country program or strategy, financing any project, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Asian Development Bank does not intend to make any judgments as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. Client Supervision Contractor Contractor Consultant Section IIA Section IIB Renardet SA XINJIANG BEIXIN National Highway China Railway First Consulting Engineers ROAD & BRIDGE Authority Group Co. Ltd. Geneva Switzerland GROUP CO., Ltd M4 Faisalabad to Khanewal Package II Gojra to Shorkot 61 KM List of Abbreviations ADB Asian Development Bank BMP Best Management Practices BBS Behavior Based Safety CAPA Corrective and Preventive actions CBOs Community Based Organizations CO Carbon monoxide dB deci Bell DCP Dry Chemical Powder DPO District Police Officer DTR Daily Time Register EC European Community EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EMP Environmental Management Plan EPA Environmental Protection Agency HSE Health, Safety and Environment KM Kilometer Leq Loudness equivalent ND Not detectable NEQS National Environmental Quality Standards NGVS No guideline values NHA National Highway Authority NO2 Nitrogen dioxide PAPs Project Affected Persons RoW Right of Way SC Supervision Consultants SIMOP Simultaneous Operation SO2 Sulfur dioxide SSEMP Site Specific Environmental Management Plan TDS Total Dissolved Solids PM Particulate Matter PPE Personal Protective Equipment RD Running Distance TRA Task Risk Assessment WHO World Health Organization Table of Contents Summary of Findings ............................................................................................... 8 Chapter 1 .................................................................................................................. 11 Introduction ............................................................................................................. 11 1.1 Construction Activities/ Work Progress:......................................................................................... 11 1.2 Project Organization: ....................................................................................................................... 11 1.3 Environmental, Health and Safety Management Team: ............................................................... 11 Chapter 2 ................................................................................................................. 12 Environmental Monitoring ..................................................................................... 12 2.1 Noise and Vibrations: ....................................................................................................................... 12 2.2 Drinking Water Quality Analysis: ................................................................................................... 12 2.3 Waste Water Analysis: ...................................................................................................................... 12 2.4 Air Quality: ........................................................................................................................................ 12 2.5 Particulate matter (PM10) ................................................................................................................. 12 Chapter 3 ................................................................................................................. 13 Environmental Management ................................................................................. 13 3.1 Camps, Plants and Borrow Pits ....................................................................................................... 13 3.1.1 Section IIA: ................................................................................................................................. 13 3.1.2 Section IIB: ................................................................................................................................. 13 3.2 Soil Erosion ........................................................................................................................................ 14 3.3 Dust /Air Emissions Monitoring .............................................................................................. 14 3.4 Waste Management ........................................................................................................................... 14 3.4.1 Waste Water Management ........................................................................................................ 14 3.4.2 Solid Waste Management .......................................................................................................... 15 3.5 Occupational Health and Safety Management ............................................................................... 15 3.5.1 Emergency Preparedness and Response .................................................................................. 15 3.5.2 Training of Workers ................................................................................................................... 16 3.5.3 Personal Protective Equipments (PPES) ................................................................................. 16 3.5.4 Site Visits/ Inspections ............................................................................................................... 16 3.6 Corrective Action Plan January - June 2018: ................................................................................. 17 3.7 Security Measures ..................................................................................................................... 17 Section IIA: .......................................................................................................................................... 17 Section IIB: .......................................................................................................................................... 18 3.8 Protected Areas ................................................................................................................................. 19 3.9 Grievance Redress Mechanism (GRM) .......................................................................................... 19 Section IIA: .......................................................................................................................................... 20 Section IIB: .......................................................................................................................................... 20 3.10 Employees Record ........................................................................................................................... 23 Contractor Section IIA: ...................................................................................................................... 23 Contractor Section IIB: ...................................................................................................................... 24 3.11 Vehicles and Machinery Maintenance ........................................................................................... 24 4. Conclusion and Recommendations ................................................................. 24 Annexure I: Photographic Record ........................................................................ 26 Contractor Section IIA ........................................................................................................................... 26 Contractor Section IIB ........................................................................................................................... 27 Annexure II: List of Borrow Pits ............................................................................ 29 Annexure III Environmental Monitoring ............................................................................................. 48 Noise Level Monitoring .......................................................................................................................... 48 Section IIA: .......................................................................................................................................... 48 Section IIB 50 Ambient Air Quality ..............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Ahmed Pur Sial
    Draft AHMED PUR SIAL Draft TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background 1.2 Punjab Municipal Service Improvement Project (PIMSIP) 1.2.1 Key Features of PMSIP 1.3 PMSIP Planning 1.3.1 Limitations of PMSIP Planning 1.4 The Planning Process 1.4.1 Secondary Data Collection 1.4.2 Mapping 1.4.3 Field Data Collection 1.4.4 Data Analysis 1.4.5 The Visioning Workshop 1.4.6 Interim Appraisal by the World Bank 1.4.7 One day Planning Refresher Workshop for Year - I TMAs CHAPTER 2 TMA PROFILE 2.1 District Profile 2.1.1 History 2.1.2 Location 2.1.3 Area/Demography 2.2 TMA/Town Profile 2.2.1 Location 2.2.2 Area/Demography CHAPTER 3 URBAN PLANNING 3.1 Situation before Planning Exercise 3.2 Mapping by PMDFC 3.3 TO (P) Office 3.4 Building Control 3.5 Existing Land Use Characteristics 3.6 Katchi Abadis 3.7 Population Density 3.8 Growth Directions CHAPTER 4 STATUS OF INFRASTRUCTURE 4.1 Road Network 4.1.1 Road Condition 4.1.2 Traffic Congestion and Parking 4.1.3 Needs 4.1.4 Street lights Draft 4.2 Water Supply 4.2.1 Service Area 4.2.2 Drinking Water Sources 4.2.3 Water Distribution Network 4.2.4 Water Storage 4.2.5 Water Demand 4.2.6 Needs 4.3 Sewerage 4.3.1 Coverage area 4.3.2 Problem Areas 4.3.2 Needs 4.4 Solid Waste Management 4.4.1 Collection System 4.4.2 Service Level 4.4.3 Land Fill/Dumping Sites 4.4.4 Operation & Maintenance 4.4.5 Needs 4.5 Fire Fighting 4.5.1 Existing Fire Fighting Arrangements 4.5.2 Needs 4.6 Parks 4.6.1 Existing Parks 4.6.2 Needs 4.7 Slaughter House 4.7.1 Existing Situation 4.7.2 Needs CHAPTER 5 WORKSHOPS ON PRIORITIZATION
    [Show full text]
  • JHANG FLOOD 2014 SITUATIONAL REPORT 10Th September 2014
    JHANG FLOOD 2014 SITUATIONAL REPORT 10th September 2014 Prepared by SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (SDO), JHANG, PUNJAB, PAKISTAN Email: [email protected] [email protected] NO: +92 3028603019 NOTE: THIS REPORT IS PREPARED ON ESTIMATED NOs AND NOT CONSISTING ON EXACT FIGURES JHANG FLOOD 2014 SITUATIONAL REPORT A) INTRODUCTION OF DISTRICT JHANG Jhang in local dialect means grove of trees Jhang is one of the oldest Districts of the Punjab Jhang was invaded by the forces of Alexander the great on his way back to Macedonia in the 4th century BC The city of Jhang was founded by Mal Khan Sial in 1462 AD The District was created in 1849 Jhang remained a part of Multan Division up to 1960 and of Sargodha Division till 1982. Later, it was attached with newly created Faisalabad Division further; its Tehsil Chiniot has been notified as District & District Jhang now, consist of four Tehsils i.e. Jhang 18 Hazari Shorkot Ahmed Pur Sial B) IMPORTANT PLACES Jhang is a land of shrines and mausoleums out of which. Shrines of Hazrat Sultan Bahoo and Hazrat Shah Jewana are well known. Darbar Hazrat Sultan Bahoo at Garh Maharaja Darbar Mai Baap at Shorkot Darbar Mai Heer at Jhang Darbar Pir Abdul Rehman at Pir Abdul Rehman Darbar Hazrat Shah Jewana at Shah Jewana Raffiquee Air Base at Shorkot Cantt JHANG FLOOD 2014 SITUATIONAL REPORT Thal Desert C) OTHER RELEVANT INFORMATIONS Trimmu Headwork’s is a milestone of the economic growth of the province. Jhelum and Chenab rivers flow through the district Main Irrigation Canals are Lower Jhelum, Lower Chenab, Haveli & Rangpur Major tribes of the district are Sials (40%), Syeds (17%), Awans (4%), Sipras,(5%) Balouch (15%), Nauls(10%) & Sheikh(10%), Malik (4%), etc District length is 160 km Boundary touches eight (8) districts 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix-I Number of Reporting Scheduled Banks and Their Branches by Nationality (1978 – 2005)
    Appendix-I Number of Reporting Scheduled Banks and their Branches by Nationality (1978 – 2005) As on Pakistani Banks Foreign Banks Total 31st No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of No. of December Banks Branches Banks Branches Banks Branches 1978 9 6,553 19 42 28 6,595 1979 9 6,689 21 51 30 6,740 1980 9 6,760 21 56 30 6,816 1981 9 7,241 21 56 30 7,297 1982 9 7,248 23 58 32 7,306 1983 9 7,120 23 59 32 7,179 1984 9 6,997 23 59 32 7,056 1985 9 6,958 23 59 32 7,017 1986 9 6,988 22 62 31 7,050 1987 9 7,061 25 65 34 7,126 1988 9 7,168 28 65 37 7,233 1989 10 7,222 25 66 35 7,288 1990 10 7,372 27 67 37 7,439 1991 10 7,477 29 72 39 7,549 1992 20 7,574 27 70 47 7,644 1993 20 7,648 27 73 47 7,721 1994 23 8,055 26 79 49 8,134 1995 25 8,345 26 77 51 8,422 1996 25 8,450 27 82 52 8,532 1997 25 8,190 27 88 52 8,278 1998 25 7,867 27 93 52 7,960 1999 25 7,779 27 95 52 7,874 2000 24 7,741 25 87 49 7,828 2001 24 6,898 25 90 49 6,988 2002 24 6,869 22 80 46 6,949 2003 26 6,823 20 81 46 6,904 2004 27 6,959 17 90 44 7,049 2005 28 7,234 17 114 45 7,348 112 Appendix-II Reporting Scheduled Banks & Their Branches by Group (December 31, 2005) Sr.
    [Show full text]
  • Impact of Ground Water on Wheat Production in District Jhang, Punjab, Pakistan
    Sarhad J. Agric. Vol.25, No.1, 2009 IMPACT OF GROUND WATER ON WHEAT PRODUCTION IN DISTRICT JHANG, PUNJAB, PAKISTAN MUHAMMAD ASHFAQ*, MUHAMMAD AKRAM*, IRFAN AHMAD BAIG* and AQEELA SAGHIR** * Department of Agriculture Economics, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan ** Department of Agriculture Extension, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Pakistan ABSTRACT Pakistan comes in a region where rainfall is untimely and not enough to support the requirements of crops. To meet ever-increasing food and fiber requirements of rapidly multiplying population, Pakistan’s agriculture depends heavily on irrigation from surface and ground water resources. Canal water resources alone are not sufficient to meet crop water requirements. To overcome this deficiency, farmers exploit the ground water resources. In present study, concentration was given to quantify the impact of ground water on wheat production in District Jhang, Punjab, Pakistan. A production function was estimated by using the regression technique. Results of the study showed that tubewell irrigation accounts for about 19 percent of the total cost of production of wheat crop. The results also showed that land holding, use of fertilizer, experience of farming and sodium absorption ratio were major factors affecting gross value product (GVP) of wheat. Adjusted R 2 of the study was 0.59 which shows the goodness of fit of data. Significant F-test showed that results were overall significant. The findings of the study would help policy makers to formulate policies promoting wheat production through efficient and wise utilization of ground water resources. Key Words: Ground water, Wheat, Productivity, Salinity Citation: Ashfaq, M., M. Akram, I.A. Baig and A.
    [Show full text]
  • Village List of Gujranwala , Pakistan
    Census 51·No. 30B (I) M.lnt.6-18 300 CENSUS OF PAKISTAN, 1951 VILLAGE LIST I PUNJAB Lahore Divisiona .,.(...t..G.ElCY- OF THE PROVINCIAL TEN DENT CENSUS, JUr.8 1952 ,NO BAHAY'(ALPUR Prleo Ps. 6·8-0 FOREWORD This Village List has been pr,epared from the material collected in con" nection with the Census of Pakistan, 1951. The object of the List is to present useful information about our villages. It was considered that in a predominantly rural country like Pakistan, reliable village statistics should be avaflable and it is hoped that the Village List will form the basis for the continued collection of such statistics. A summary table of the totals for each tehsil showing its area to the nearest square mile. and Its population and the number of houses to the nearest hundred is given on page I together with the page number on which each tehsil begins. The general village table, which has been compiled district-wise and arranged tehsil-wise, appears on page 3 et seq. Within each tehsil the Revenue Kanungo holqos are shown according to their order in the census records. The Village in which the Revenue Kanungo usually resides is printed in bold type at the beginning of each Kanungo holqa and the remaining Villages comprising the ha/qas, are shown thereunder in the order of their revenue hadbast numbers, which are given in column o. Rokhs (tree plantations) and other similar areas even where they are allotted separate revenue hadbast numbers have not been shown as they were not reported in the Charge and Household summaries.
    [Show full text]
  • Participants
    PUNJAB MUNICIPAL DEVELOPMENT FUND COMPANY PUNJAB MUNICIPAL SERVICES IMPROVEMENT PROJECT (PMSIP) PLANNING REPORT GOJRA 2008 TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION........................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 BACKGROUND ...................................................................................................................................... 4 1.1.1 Punjab Municipal Service Improvement Project (PIMSIP) ............................................................ 4 1.2 KEY FEATURES OF PMSIP ................................................................................................................... 4 1.3 PMSIP PLANNING ................................................................................................................................ 4 1.3.1 Limitations of PMSIP Planning ...................................................................................................... 5 1.4 THE PLANNING PROCESS ...................................................................................................................... 5 1.4.1 Secondary Data Collection ............................................................................................................. 5 1.4.2 Mapping .......................................................................................................................................... 6 1.4.3 Orientation Workshop....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Psdp 2008-2009
    WATER & POWER DIVISION (WATER SECTOR) (Million Rupees) Sl. Name, Location & Status of the Estimated Cost Expenditure Throw- Allocation for 2008-09 No Scheme Total Foreign upto June forward as Rupee Foreign Total Loan 2008 on 01-7-08 Loan 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 On-going 1 Raising of Mangla Dam 62553.000 0.000 59896.310 2656.690 18000.000 0.000 18000.000 2 Mirani Dam 5861.000 0.000 4931.540 929.460 300.000 0.000 300.000 3 Resettlement Action Plan - Mirani Dam 1243.940 0.000 662.690 581.250 50.000 0.000 50.000 4 Sabakzai Dam 1576.550 0.000 1455.970 120.580 120.000 0.000 120.000 5 Kurram Tangi Dam 17205.266 5368.222 874.710 16330.556 500.000 0.000 500.000 6 Satpara Multipurpose Dam 2090.431 195.786 2442.040 0.000 100.000 0.000 100.000 7 Gomal Zam Dam 12829.000 4964.000 3678.610 9150.390 2000.000 0.000 2000.000 8 Greater Thal Canal (Phase - I) 30467.000 0.000 8091.530 22375.470 1500.000 0.000 1500.000 9 Kachhi Canal (Phase - I) 31204.000 0.000 19517.820 11686.180 8500.000 0.000 8500.000 10 Rainee Canal (Phase - I) 18861.580 0.000 5871.730 12989.850 3000.000 0.000 3000.000 11 Lower Indus Right Bank Irrigation & 14707.000 0.000 11072.110 3634.890 2500.000 0.000 2500.000 Drainage, Sindh 12 Balochistan Effluent Disposal into RBOD.
    [Show full text]
  • Pakistan: Punjab Road Development Sector Project
    Performance Pakistan: Punjab Road Evaluation Report Development Sector Project Independent Evaluation Performance Evaluation Report December 2013 Pakistan: Punjab Road Development Sector Project Reference Number: PPE: PAK 2013-18 Project Number: 32058 Loan Number: 1928 Independent Evaluation: PE-767 Note: In this report, "$" refers to US dollars. Director General V. Thomas, Independent Evaluation Department (IED) Officer-in-Charge H. Hettige, Independent Evaluation Division 2, IED Team leader M. J. Dimayuga, Senior Evaluation Officer, IED Team member J. Mendez-Santos, Senior Evaluation Assistant, IED In preparing any evaluation report, or by making any designation of or reference to a particular territory or geographic area in this document, the Independent Evaluation Department does not intend to make any judgment as to the legal or other status of any territory or area. The guidelines formally adopted by the Independent Evaluation Department (IED) on avoiding conflict of interest in its independent evaluations were observed in the preparation of this report. To the knowledge of the management of IED, there were no conflicts of interest of the persons preparing, reviewing, or approving this report. Abbreviations ADB – Asian Development Bank CWD – Communication and Works Department EIRR – economic internal rate of return HDM – highway development and management IED – Independent Evaluation Department IEM – independent evaluation mission IRI – International roughness index km – kilometer PCR – project completion report PEC – project engineering cell PPG – Punjab provincial government RAR – rural access road TA – technical assistance VOC – vehicle operating cost Currency Equivalents Currency unit – Pakistan rupee/s (PRe/PRs) At Appraisal At Project Completion At Independent Evaluation (September 2002) (December 2008) (December 2012) PRe1.00 = $0.0169 $0.01464 $0.0104 $1.00 = PRs56.00 PRs59.00 PRs95.94 Contents Acknowledgements i Basic Data iii Executive Summary v Chapter 1: Introduction A.
    [Show full text]
  • Jhang Blockwise
    POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD DETAIL FROM BLOCK TO DISTRICT LEVEL PUNJAB (JHANG DISTRICT) ADMIN UNIT POPULATION NO OF HH JHANG DISTRICT 2,744,085 427,513 18-HAZARI TEHSIL 295,801 47,766 18-HAZARI MC 27,561 4310 CHARGE NO 05 27,561 4310 CIRCLE NO 01 6,074 1020 258050101 1,585 294 258050102 548 111 258050103 874 171 258050104 1,738 255 258050105 834 115 258050106 495 74 CIRCLE NO 02 4,429 702 258050201 1,671 228 258050202 2,092 353 258050203 666 121 CIRCLE NO 03 11,282 1614 258050301 2,440 349 258050302 2,594 342 258050303 699 118 258050304 1,291 160 258050305 1,221 192 258050306 1,047 154 258050307 1,990 299 CIRCLE NO 04 5,776 974 258050401 1,438 267 258050402 1,306 217 258050403 570 109 258050404 2,106 320 258050405 356 61 18-HAZARI QH 53,006 8720 18-HAZARI PC 1,605 300 BASTI SANGA 783 148 258030102 783 148 KAMRAH 694 125 258030103 694 125 LASHKARI 22 3 258030104 22 3 LATIF SHAH 106 24 258030105 106 24 BARHARI PC 5,525 901 BARHARI 2,699 440 258030201 912 148 258030202 1,077 179 258030203 710 113 CHAK NO. 011/3 2,826 461 Page 1 of 76 POPULATION AND HOUSEHOLD DETAIL FROM BLOCK TO DISTRICT LEVEL PUNJAB (JHANG DISTRICT) ADMIN UNIT POPULATION NO OF HH 258030204 1,317 197 258030205 1,509 264 DAL PC 4,738 708 DAL 4,738 708 258030301 1,171 187 258030302 1,634 239 258030303 1,933 282 DHABBI PC 1,923 326 DHABBI 1,174 188 258030401 1,174 188 LUHRKA 449 89 258030404 449 89 SARWANI PATOANA 300 49 258030405 300 49 KOT NAULAN PC 5,142 937 FATEH SHAH 920 157 258030504 920 157 KOT NAULAN 4,096 755 258030501 2,510 465 258030502 1,586 290 SHAH MAHMUD 126 25
    [Show full text]
  • Lessons Learned from Jhang, Pakistan
    District-level Joint Sector Review and WASH Bottleneck Analysis Tool: Lessons Learned from Jhang, Pakistan SUMMARY In 2017, the Government of Pakistan rolled out Joint Sector Reviews (JSR) in four provinces in order to periodically assess the performance of the water, sanitation and hygiene (WASH) sector. UNICEF, the Government, development partners, and civil society participated in the process, using the WASH Bottleneck Analysis Tool (WASH-BAT) as a guiding framework. The WASH-BAT, which was designed by UNICEF with inputs from WASH sector stakeholders, was used to facilitate joint identification and prioritisation of sector bottlenecks and create an action plan for their removal. The WASH-BAT covers different sub-sectors (e.g. urban water supply, rural water supply, urban sanitation, rural sanitation, urban hygiene, and rural hygiene) and different levels of implementation (e.g. national, provincial and district). The WASH-BAT has already proven to be an effective tool in assessing the WASH sector bottlenecks, at both provincial and national levels in Pakistan. During the past three years, it has become evident that bottlenecks also exist at the grassroots level, hence the need for district JSRs. With DFID support, UNICEF and the Government of Punjab conducted a district-level JSR in Jhang District, where implementation of the Accelerated Sanitation and Water for All (ASWA-2) project is underway. This field note describes how the JSR was conducted in Jhang District, using WASH-BAT. Key WASH bottlenecks in Jhang District are described, along with proposed actions for mitigation and the removal of identified impediments. Introduction A JSR is a periodic process that brings together different WASH stakeholders and government to In 2016, Pakistan’s Ministry of Climate Change engage in dialogue; review the status, progress (MoCC), in collaboration with provincial and performance; as well as make decisions on governments and WASH sector partners, priority actions aimed at improving access to organised a capacity development workshop to roll WASH services.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Assessment Study Report District Jhang
    BBaasseelliinnee AAsssseessssmmeenntt SSttuuddyy RReeppoorrtt District Jhang (1) Ver 2.00 Update on 10-Feb-09 Sr. # CONTENTS Page # 1 Key Counterparts in Government 3 2 Map 3 3 Summary 4 4 Situation Analysis 7 5 Table 1: Tehsils & Unions in the District 7 5 Table 2: Population Size And Growth Of Major Cities 8 Table 3: Socio Economic Indicators, Coverage (Vis-1Vis Punjab), Ranking , 6 8 MDG Targets MICS (2003-04) District-wise Data 7 Table 4: Literacy Ratio Ranking Of Punjab Districts (Age 10 years & above) 9 8 Table 4a: Population That Has Ever Attended School 9 9 Table 4b: Literacy-Population 10 Years And Older 9 10 Table 4c: Gross Enrolment Rate At The Primary Level 9 11 Table 4d: Net Enrolment Rate At The Primary Level 9 12 Table 5: Institutions by Level, Gender, Location and Sector(Public) 10 13 Table 6: Enrolment by Stage, Gender, Location and Public Sector 11 14 Table 7: Teachers by Level, Gender, Location and Sector 11 15 Table 8: Physical Facilities by Level and Gender (Public) 12 16 Table 9: Status of Public Schools by National, Provincial and District 13 Table 10: Sanctioned, Filled-in, Vacant and Contract Teacher's Posts by Level 17 13 and Gender (Public) 18 Table 11: OXFAM Project List of selected Schools 14 19 Table 12: Summary of School Baseline Survey Report (WSIP Schools) 15 20 Table 13: Summary of School Baseline Survey - Cluster Schools 17 21 Table 13a: Summary of School Councils – WSIP Schools 22 22 District Based Baseline Reports on Learning Levels 23 23 Table 14: Summary of Learning Levels WSIP Schools 25 24 Table
    [Show full text]
  • Riverine Flood Assessment in Jhang District in Connection with ENSO and Summer Monsoon Rainfall Over Upper Indus Basin for 2010
    Riverine flood assessment in Jhang district in connection with ENSO and summer monsoon rainfall over Upper Indus Basin for 2010 Bushra Khalid1, 2, 3, 4, Bueh Cholaw1, Débora Souza Alvim5, Shumaila Javeed6, Junaid Aziz Khan7, Muhammad Asif Javed8, Azmat Hayat Khan9 Corresponding author’s email: [email protected] Corresponding author’s mobile: 0092-3315719701 1International Center for Climate and Environment Sciences, Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China 2Earth System Physics, The Abdus Salam International Centre for Theoretical Physics, Trieste, Italy 3Department of Environmental Science, International Islamic University, Islamabad, Pakistan 4International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria 5Center for Weather Forecasting and Climate Studies, National Institute for Space Research, Cachoeira Paulista, São Paulo, Brazil 6Department of Mathematics, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan 7Institute of Geographical Information System (IGIS), National University of Science and Technology (NUST), Islamabad, Pakistan 8Department of Humanities, COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad, Pakistan 9Pakistan Meteorological Department, Quetta, Pakistan 1 1 Abstract 2 3 Pakistan has experienced severe floods over the past decades due to climate 4 variability. Among all the floods, the flood of 2010 was the worst in history. 5 This study focuses on the assessment of 1) riverine flooding in the district Jhang 6 (where Jhelum and Chenab rivers join, and the district was severely flood 7 affected) and 2) south Asiatic summer monsoon rainfall patterns and anomalies 8 considering the case of 2010 flood in Pakistan. The land use/cover change has 9 been analyzed by using Landsat TM 30 m resolution satellite imageries for 10 supervised classification, and three instances have been compared i.e., pre 11 flooding, flooding, and post flooding.
    [Show full text]