DOCSLIB.ORG

Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles Minor) Sarah Coury

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles Minor) Sarah Coury Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles minor) Sarah Coury Wyandotte, MI © Jerry Jourdan At dusk and dawn over cities as well as open sections of the land, the Common Nighthawk can often be seen in its erratic, bat-like pursuit of insects on the wing. This member of the Distribution nightjar family is famous for the male’s Prior to the late 1890s when its numbers dramatic courtship displays in which it dives dropped significantly, probably because of within two meters (6.6 feet) of the ground and overhunting during migration through southern abruptly turns, flexing its wings to produce a states, the Common Nighthawk was thought to resounding boom as air rushes through the be fairly abundant and widespread in Michigan. primary feathers. Common Nighthawks lay By the middle of the twentieth century, the eggs directly onto bare, open surfaces such as species had recovered its “common” state status farm fields, beaches, prairies, rock outcrops, (Eastman 1991). Though general declines of parking lots, pine barrens and burned or cleared this species have been evident since the 1960s, patches of forest, and commonly will nest on the at the time of MBBA I, it maintained a wide flat gravel rooftops of cities and towns (Poulin distribution in Michigan, with reports from et al. 1996, Rasmussen 2006). almost every county. During the breeding season, this species can be Since then its distribution has contracted found throughout Canada excepting the extreme considerably, with many counties statewide north, in all 48 continental U.S. states and reporting dwindling numbers. In eighteen of the patches of the interior and gulf coast of Mexico, LP counties where the bird was present during continuing locally through Central America. MBBA I, none were found during MBBA II, Though its winter range is yet to be well and in the extensively suburban region of the studied, it is thought to extend across much of southeast, Common Nighthawks seemed to have middle South America, giving the Common almost disappeared in seven counties which Nighthawk one of the longest migration routes were former hotspots. A likely explanation is of any North American bird (Poulin et al. 1996). the major land use changes that have occurred in During recent decades, numbers of this species that area between atlas periods. In Oakland have been steadily declining in Michigan and County from 1990-2000, for example, the throughout its expansive breeding range. It is, Michigan DNRE reported a 63% reduction in however, still considered a locally common agricultural land where the species may have summer resident in the state, and can be found previously nested, and an 84% increase in in many areas of both peninsulas. residential development (Oakes and Payne © 2011 Kalamazoo Nature Center Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles minor) Sarah Coury 2005). The thumb area, southern and central Royale in the UP, Crawford and Oscoda counties of the LP showed a sparse distribution counties in the NLP and the SLP counties of of Common Nighthawks during MBBA I, which Wayne and Washtenaw. The difficulties has continued to contract since that time. Areas presented by efforts to obtain reliable data for of abundance in both MBBA periods were those this species include its elusiveness during featuring jack-pine plains, such as the north- daylight hours, absence of nesting material, central NLP and, scattered pockets across the camouflaged eggs and inaccessibility to rooftop UP, and around urban areas with a high density nesting sites, all of which may skew population of flat gravel roofs, such as Wayne and trend results. Washtenaw Counties in the eastern SLP. High proportions of the bird within regions featuring Conservation Needs these two habitat types were also noted in New Numerous factors may be contributing to the York, Wisconsin and Ontario accounts (Medler nationwide decline of Common Nighthawks. As 2008, Rasmussen 2006, Sandilands 2005). with all ground nesting birds, this species is highly susceptible to predation, especially by Breeding Biology domestic cats, and gulls and crows commonly In Michigan, Common Nighthawks arrive predate urban rooftop nests (Medler 2008). throughout May and breeding occurs primarily Wedgewood (1991) noted a correlation between in June (Eastman 1991). Females invariably lay the drop in Common Nighthawk populations two eggs directly onto a bare surface with no and the implementation of nonselective added nesting material, and incubate for 16-20 pesticide spraying programs for mosquitoes, as days (Poulin et al.1996). Males assume primary the bird’s diet consists entirely of insects. responsibility for feeding of the young via Decreasing city populations are probably due to regurgitation during the 17-18 days before they the ongoing transition from gravel to rubberized fledge (Poulin et al. 1996). From late August roofs, which are not used by the birds because through mid September, Common Nighthawks of their failure to provide a camouflage surface form flocks and begin their fall migration for adults and eggs alike, as well as their (Eastman 1991). tendency toward much hotter temperatures in the sun (Marzilli 1989). Abundance and Population Trends Breeding Bird Survey estimates for the Types of Common Nighthawk habitat loss Common Nighthawk in Michigan indicate a especially relevant in Michigan include statistically insignificant population decline of agricultural lands and jack-pine barrens. In the 0.6% per year from 1990-2007 (Sauer et al. southern LP, large areas of open cropland have 2008). During MBBA II, Common Nighthawks been lost to development and succession, as were found in a total of 350 atlas blocks (4.9%), small farming operations face uncertain down from 881 (12.4%) during MBBA I. Of financial futures (Sargent and Carter 1999). the 350 observations, 218 were “possible,” 121 Additionally in the north, fire suppression and were “probable,” and 11 – three from the an influx of invasive species has reduced the Detroit area and the rest scattered widely across area’s historically prevalent jack-pine barrens the state – were breeding confirmations. From (Sargent and Carter 1999). Management MBBA I to MBBA II, observations declined measures for this species that have proven from 219 to 136 in the UP, from 297 to 111 in successful include placing gravel pads in the NLP and from 365 to 103 in the SLP. Areas corners of flat, rubberized roofs (Marzilli 1989), with the highest counts were Chippewa, and maintaining open prairie and forest habitat Schoolcraft and Marquette counties and Isle through the use of prescribed burns. © 2011 Kalamazoo Nature Center Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles minor) Sarah Coury Sauer, J. R., J. E. Hines, and J. Fallon. 2008. Literature Cited The North American Breeding Bird Survey, Results and Analysis 1966 - 2007. Version Eastman, J. 1991. Common Nighthawk. In 5.15.2008. USGS Patuxent Wildlife Brewer, R., G.A. McPeek, and R.J. Adams, Research Center, Laurel, MD Jr. (eds.). 1991. The Atlas of Breeding Birds Wedgewood, J.A. 1991. Common Nighthawks of Michigan. Michigan State University in Saskatoon. Saskatchewan Natural Press, East Lansing, Michigan.. History Society, Regina. Marzilli, V. 1989. Up on the Roof. Maine Fish and Wildlife 31:25-29. Medler, M.D. 2008. Common Nighthawk. In McGowan, K.J., and K Corwin (eds.). 2008. The Second Atlas of Breeding Birds in New York State. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. Oakes, J. and Payne, T. 2005. Worksheet for Establishing Deer Population Goals – DMU 063, Oakland County 2006-2010. Michigan Department of Natural Resources. <http://www.dnr.state.mi.us/publications/pd fs/wildlife/Draft_Deer_Goals06_PDFs/DM U063.pdf>. Retrieved May 12, 2010. Poulin, R.G., S.D. Grindal, and R.M. Brigham. 1996. Common Nighthawk. In The Birds of North America, No. 213 (A. Poole and F. Gill, eds.). The Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and The American Ornithologist’s Union, Washington, D.C. Rasmussen, P. 2006. Common Nighthawk. In Cutright, N.J., B.R. Harriman, and R.W. Howe (eds.). 2006. Atlas of the Breeding Birds of Wisconsin. The Wisconsin Society for Ornithology. Waukesha, WI. Sandilands, A. 2007. Common Nighthawk. In Cadman, M.D., D.A. Sutherland, G.G. Beck, D. Lepage, and A.R. Couturier (eds.). 2007. Atlas of the Breeding Birds of Ontario, 2001-2005. Bird Studies Canada, Environment Canada, Ontario Field Ornithologists, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, and Ontario Nature. Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Sargent, M.S. and Carter, K.S., ed. 1999. Managing Michigan Wildlife: A Landowners Guide. Michigan United Conservation Clubs, East Lansing, Michigan. © 2011 Kalamazoo Nature Center .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Description of the Nest and Nestling of Great Eared Nightjar Eurostopodus Macrotis from Luzon, Philippines
    128 SHORT NOTES Forktail 20 (2004) Kennedy, R. S. and Ruedas, L. S. (1992) Centers of biological diver- Mittermeier, R. A., Myers, N. and Mittermeier, C. G. (1999) sity in the Philippines: surveys, training, and museum Hotspots: earth’s biologically richest and most endangered terrestrial modernization. Unpublished. ecosystems. Mexico City: CEMEX. Magsalay, P., Brooks, T., Dutson, G. and Timmins, R. (1995) Swedish Space Corporation [SSC] (1988) Mapping of the natural Extinction and conservation on Cebu. Nature 373: 294. conditions of the Philippines. Final Report. 30 April 1988. Mallari, N. A. D., Tabaranza, B. R. and Crosby, M. J. (2001) Key Unpublished. conservation sites in the Philippines: a Haribon Foundation and BirdLife International directory of Important Bird Areas. Makati City: Bookmark, Inc. N. A. D. Mallari, Haribon Foundation for the Conservation of Natural Resources, 4/F Fil Garcia Tower, 140 Kalayaan Avenue and corner of Mayaman Street, Diliman, Quezon City 1101, Philippines. Email: [email protected] M. J. Crosby, BirdLife International,Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 0NA, U.K. Email: [email protected] N. J. Collar, Conservation Biology Group, Department of Zoology, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ and BirdLife International,Wellbrook Court, Girton Road, Cambridge CB3 0NA, U.K. Email: [email protected] Description of the nest and nestling of Great Eared Nightjar Eurostopodus macrotis from Luzon, Philippines J. S. STRIJK During March and April 2002, I conducted fieldwork and Nurney 1998, Kennedy et al. 2000). However, its 6–7 km north-east of Masipi-East, Barangay Masipi- nest, eggs and chicks had not been previously East, Cabagan municipality, Isabela province, on described.
    [Show full text]
  • Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with Birds Observed Off-Campus During BIOL3400 Field Course
    Birds of the East Texas Baptist University Campus with birds observed off-campus during BIOL3400 Field course Photo Credit: Talton Cooper Species Descriptions and Photos by students of BIOL3400 Edited by Troy A. Ladine Photo Credit: Kenneth Anding Links to Tables, Figures, and Species accounts for birds observed during May-term course or winter bird counts. Figure 1. Location of Environmental Studies Area Table. 1. Number of species and number of days observing birds during the field course from 2005 to 2016 and annual statistics. Table 2. Compilation of species observed during May 2005 - 2016 on campus and off-campus. Table 3. Number of days, by year, species have been observed on the campus of ETBU. Table 4. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during the off-campus trips. Table 5. Number of days, by year, species have been observed during a winter count of birds on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Table 6. Species observed from 1 September to 1 October 2009 on the Environmental Studies Area of ETBU. Alphabetical Listing of Birds with authors of accounts and photographers . A Acadian Flycatcher B Anhinga B Belted Kingfisher Alder Flycatcher Bald Eagle Travis W. Sammons American Bittern Shane Kelehan Bewick's Wren Lynlea Hansen Rusty Collier Black Phoebe American Coot Leslie Fletcher Black-throated Blue Warbler Jordan Bartlett Jovana Nieto Jacob Stone American Crow Baltimore Oriole Black Vulture Zane Gruznina Pete Fitzsimmons Jeremy Alexander Darius Roberts George Plumlee Blair Brown Rachel Hastie Janae Wineland Brent Lewis American Goldfinch Barn Swallow Keely Schlabs Kathleen Santanello Katy Gifford Black-and-white Warbler Matthew Armendarez Jordan Brewer Sheridan A.
    [Show full text]
  • Artificial Water Catchments Influence Wildlife Distribution in the Mojave
    The Journal of Wildlife Management; DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21654 Research Article Artificial Water Catchments Influence Wildlife Distribution in the Mojave Desert LINDSEY N. RICH,1,2 Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California- Berkeley, 130 Mulford Hall 3114, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA STEVEN R. BEISSINGER, Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California- Berkeley, 130 Mulford Hall 3114, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA JUSTIN S. BRASHARES, Department of Environmental Science, Policy, and Management, University of California- Berkeley, 130 Mulford Hall 3114, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA BRETT J. FURNAS, Wildlife Investigations Laboratory, California Department of Fish and Wildlife, Rancho Cordova, CA 95670, USA ABSTRACT Water often limits the distribution and productivity of wildlife in arid environments. Consequently, resource managers have constructed artificial water catchments (AWCs) in deserts of the southwestern United States, assuming that additional free water benefits wildlife. We tested this assumption by using data from acoustic and camera trap surveys to determine whether AWCs influenced the distributions of terrestrial mammals (>0.5 kg), birds, and bats in the Mojave Desert, California, USA. We sampled 200 sites in 2016–2017 using camera traps and acoustic recording units, 52 of which had AWCs. We identified detections to the species-level, and modeled occupancy for each of the 44 species of wildlife photographed or recorded. Artificial water catchments explained spatial variation in occupancy for 8 terrestrial mammals, 4 bats, and 18 bird species. Occupancy of 18 species was strongly and positively associated with AWCs, whereas 1 species (i.e., horned lark [Eremophila alpestris]) was negatively associated. Access to an AWC had a larger influence on species’ distributions than precipitation and slope and was nearly as influential as temperature.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Ecology of the European Nightjar (Caprimulgus Europaeus) in a Complex Heathland-Plantation Landscape
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of East Anglia digital repository The conservation ecology of the European nightjar (Caprimulgus europaeus) in a complex heathland-plantation landscape. Katrina Sharps A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy at the School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. May 2013 © This copy of the thesis has been supplied on condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with the author and that use of any information derived there from must be in accordance with current UK Copyright Law. In addition, any quotation or extract must include full attribution. Acknowledgements Firstly, I would like to thank my primary supervisor Paul Dolman for his constant advice, support and enthusiasm throughout this PhD. I am also grateful to the other members of my supervisory team: Ian Henderson of the British Trust for Ornithology (BTO) and Andrew Lovett of UEA, for their useful guidance. Special thanks also go to Neal Armour-Chelu of the Forestry Commission and Greg Conway of the BTO for practical advice for the fieldwork and their invaluable experience and knowledge of forest management and working with nightjars respectively. Next, I would like to thank the other members of my radio-tracking and moth trapping teams – Vivien Hartwell, Laura Wilkinson, Elwyn Sharps, Alastair Feather, Kirsten Miller and Isobel Winney. Their efforts were tireless and they showed dedication to the project throughout. Additional thanks to all radio-tracking and nest finding volunteers, including Forestry Commission, RSPB and Wildlife Trust staff.
    [Show full text]
  • Nocturnal Survey Guidelines Owls, Nighthawks and Whip-Poor-Wills Present Atlas Surveyors with Several Challenges
    Nocturnal Survey Guidelines Owls, nighthawks and Whip-poor-wills present atlas surveyors with several challenges. Although many Minnesota species, including thrushes and marsh birds, may vocalize at sunset, pre-dawn, or even at night, most can be detected during early morning and daytime surveys. The surveyor’s chances of detecting most owls, however, as well as the common nighthawk and whip-poor-will, will be considerably enhanced by adding nocturnal surveys. Owls Minnesota’s 11 owl species are a mix of permanent, non-migratory residents (Eastern Screech Owl, Great Horned Owl and Barred Owl); summer residents (Long-eared Owl, Short-eared Owl, and Saw-whet Owl) and three species whose summer populations probably include both permanent residents and migratory invaders (Boreal Owl, Northern Hawk Owl and Great Gray Owl). The Burrowing Owl is an extremely rare summer resident in the western grassland region and the Barn Owl has been an erratic species whose status as a permanent resident or migratory invader is unknown. Three of these species tend to be more diurnal and the chances of seeing them during the day are relatively good. They include two open habitat species, the Short-eared Owl and Burrowing Owl, and one forest species, the Northern Hawk Owl. Like marsh hawks, Short- eared Owls can often be seen flying low over wet grasslands and marshes hunting for prey during the morning and early evening hours. The Burrowing Owl, a very rare nesting species in the state, is prominent as it stands as a sentinel atop its nesting burrow, just inches above the surrounding grassland.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Nighthawk Chordeiles Minor
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor in Canada SPECIAL CONCERN 2018 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2018. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 50 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Previous report(s): COSEWIC 2007. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xi + 25 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Andrew Gregg Horn for writing the status report on Common Nighthawk, Chordeiles minor, prepared under contract with Environment and Climate Change Canada. This report was overseen and edited by Richard Elliot, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Birds Specialist Subcommittee. For additional copies contact: COSEWIC Secretariat c/o Canadian Wildlife Service Environment and Climate Change Canada Ottawa, ON K1A 0H3 Tel.: 819-938-4125 Fax: 819-938-3984 E-mail: [email protected] http://www.cosewic.gc.ca Également disponible en français sous le titre Ếvaluation et Rapport de situation du COSEPAC sur L’engoulevent d’Amérique (Chordeiles minor) au Canada. Cover illustration/photo: Common Nighthawk, copyright by Ronnie d'Entremont. Her Majesty the Queen in Right of Canada, 2018. Catalogue No. CW69-14/515-2018E-PDF ISBN 978-0-660-27850-6 COSEWIC Assessment Summary Assessment Summary – April 2018 Common name Common Nighthawk Scientific name Chordeiles minor Status Special Concern Reason for designation This aerial insectivore is a widespread breeding bird across southern and boreal Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Monitoring Nesting Golden Eagles for the Farmington Field Office, and Nesting Raptors for the Taos Field Office, BLM Resource Areas, New Mexico
    Monitoring Nesting Golden Eagles for the Farmington Field Office, and Nesting Raptors for the Taos Field Office, BLM Resource Areas, New Mexico. 2006 Annual Report Prepared for: Bureau of Land Management Farmington and Taos Field Offices New Mexico Prepared by: Hawks Aloft, Inc. P.O. Box 10028 Albuquerque, NM 87184 (505) 828-9455 E-mail: [email protected] Golden Eagle and Raptor Surveys, Farmington and Taos Field Offices, 2005 20 December 2006 TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ....................................................................................................................... iii Chapter 1: Distribution and reproductive success for Golden Eagles on BLM Administered Land in San Juan, McKinley, Rio Arriba, and Sandoval Counties, New Mexico. Introduction ......................................................................................................................................2 Study areas .......................................................................................................................................3 Methods ...........................................................................................................................................3 Results ..............................................................................................................................................5 Discussion ........................................................................................................................................7 Recommendations ............................................................................................................................9
    [Show full text]
  • Highland Lakes Steward
    Highland Lakes Steward HIGHLAND LAKES CHAPTER July 2015 Volume 6, Issue 7 MISSION by Cris Faught The Texas Master PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Naturalist program is come and go many times instead of stay- a natural resource- Can you identify this animal? ing for an extended time. My feeder is based volunteer train- 1. Omnivore. ing and development within easy sight and sound of the front 2. Lives in close proximity to you. program sponsored porch, and they never seemed to mind 3. Range up to 4500 acres in rural statewide by Texas us looking at or talking about them. A&M AgriLife Exten- areas. These are wild though, so they know sion and the Texas 4. Has a reputation for being very Parks and Wildlife what boundaries are and closely smart. Department. watched us to monitor any infractions of 5. Has an average of six siblings and The mission of the their safety lines. They can make over program is to develop lives up to 12 years. 40 sounds including yips, howls and a corps of well- 6. Can't fly but can climb. informed volunteers growls. The one I heard sounded who provide educa- Ok, no big surprise, but the fox is an enough like a scream or a raven call that tion, outreach, and amazing animal to have around, as you I knew I was being warned to come no service dedicated to know, if you have ever had the oppor- the beneficial manage- closer. I didn't. tunity to watch them. I had the pleasure ment of natural re- The next time you see their boundary of watching a pair of red foxes feed at my sources and natural marker or their playful antics, I hope you areas within their sunflower seed feeder on several occa- will stay long enough to observe them in communities for the sions and they are amazing! state of Texas action.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles Minor)
    Newfoundland & Labrador Species at Risk Status: Threatened Common Nighthawk (Chordeiles minor) A medium-sized bird, with a large flattened head, large eyes and mouth, a small bill, and a long, slightly notched tail. They have dark brown plumage, mottled with black, white, and buff. Their long, slender pointed wings reveal a white bar when in flight. They feed on insects and are active at dawn and dusk. © Vincent Lucas Provincial Distribution Habitat/ Range Common Nighthawks breed on bare ground, such as sand dunes, beaches, forest clearings, burned areas, rocky outcrops and barrens, peatbogs, and agricultural pastures. They are found across Canada, but in Eastern Canada they breed only in the southern part of Labrador and are considered an uncommon visitor in Newfoundland. Common Nighthawks winter throughout South America. Population Trends In Canada, this rare bird is undergoing a significant long-term population decline of 4.2% per year. Population trends within the Province are unknown. Limiting Factors and Threats Common Nighthawks have been affected by a decrease in the abundance of insects and an increase in habitat loss and alteration. They adapted to urbanization by making use of flat, gravel-covered rooftops as nest sites. Unfortunately, along with their traditional open habitats, these nesting sites are being lost. Special Significance It is the only species of insectivorous, crepuscular bird that uses a wide variety of habitats and is widely distributed in Canada. You can help protect the Common Nighthawk: Department of Environment & Conservation Report any sightings to the Wildlife Division. Wildlife Division Participate in bird surveys and counts. Endangered Species & Biodiversity Support habitat protection for all our rare species.
    [Show full text]
  • Systematics of Smaller Asian Night Birds Based on Voice
    SYSTEMATICS OF SMALLER ASIAN NIGHT BIRDS BASED ON VOICE BY JOE T. MARSHALL ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS NO. 25 PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION 1978 SYSTEMATICS OF SMALLER ASIAN NIGHT BIRDS BASED ON VOICE BY JOE T. MARSHALL ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS NO. 25 PUBLISHED BY THE AMERICAN ORNITHOLOGISTS' UNION 1978 Frontispiece: Otus icterorhynchus?stresemanni of Sumatra, with apologiesto G. M. Sutton and The Birdsof Arizona. The absenceof wings,far from implyingflightlessness, emphasizes the important parts of the plumagefor speciescomparisons--the interscapulars and flanks. These "control" the more variablepatterns of head and wings,which will always be in harmonywith the basicpattern of back and flanks. ORNITHOLOGICAL MONOGRAPHS This series, publishedby the American Ornithologists'Union, has been estab- lished for major papers too long for inclusionin the Union's journal, The Auk. Publication has been subsidizedby funds from the National Fish and Wildlife Laboratory, Washington, D.C. Correspondenceconcerning manuscripts for publicationin this seriesshould be addressedto the Editor-elect, Dr. Mercedes S. Foster, Department of Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620. Copiesof OrnithologicalMonographs may be orderedfrom the Assistantto the Treasurer of the AOU, Glen E. Woolfenden,Department of Biology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida 33620. (See price list on back and inside back cover.) OrnithologicalMonographs No. 25, viii + 58 pp., separatephonodisc supple- ment. Editor, John William Hardy Special Associate Editors of this issue, Kenneth C. Parkes, Section of Birds, Carnegie Museum, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania15213, and Oliver L. Austin, Jr., Departmentof Natural Sciences,Florida State Museum, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611. Assistant Editor, June B. Gabaldon Author, Joe T. Marshall, Bird Section, National Fish and Wildlife Laboratory, National Museumof Natural History, Washington,D.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Sri Lanka: Island Endemics and Wintering Specialties
    SRI LANKA: ISLAND ENDEMICS AND WINTERING SPECIALTIES 12 – 25 JANUARY 2020 Serendib Scops Owl, discovered in 2001, is one of our endemic targets on this trip. www.birdingecotours.com [email protected] 2 | ITINERARY Sri Lanka: Island Endemics & Wintering Specialties Jan 2020 Sri Lanka is a picturesque continental island situated at the southern tip of India and has actually been connected to India for much of its geological past through episodes of lower sea level. Despite these land-bridge connections, faunal exchange between the rainforests found in Southern India and Sri Lanka has been minimal. This lack of exchange of species is probably due to the inability of rainforest organisms to disperse though the interceding areas of dry lowlands. These dry lowlands are still dry today and receive only one major rainy season, whereas Sri Lanka’s ‘wet zone’ experiences two annual monsoons. This long insularity of Sri Lankan biota in a moist tropical environment has led to the emergence of a bewildering variety of endemic biodiversity. This is why southwestern Sri Lanka and the Western Ghats of southern India are jointly regarded as one of the globe’s 34 biodiversity hotspots. Furthermore, Sri Lanka is the westernmost representative of Indo-Malayan flora, and its abundant birdlife also shows many such affinities. Sri Lanka is home to 34 currently recognized IOC endemic species with some of the most impressive ones including the rare Sri Lanka Spurfowl, gaudy Sri Lanka Junglefowl, Sri Lanka Hanging Parrot, and Layard’s Parakeet, the shy, thicket-dwelling Red-faced Malkoha, the tiny Chestnut-backed Owlet, the common Sri Lanka Grey Hornbill, Yellow- fronted Barbet, Crimson-fronted Barbet, Yellow-eared Bulbul, the spectacular Sri Lanka Blue Magpie, the cute Sri Lanka White-eye, and the tricky, but worth-the-effort trio of Sri Lanka Whistling Thrush and Sri Lanka and Spot-winged Thrushes.
    [Show full text]
  • On October 15, 2018, the Committee on the Status of Endangered
    On October 15, 2018, the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada (COSEWIC) submitted 88 assessments of species at risk to the federal Minister of the Environment. On January 11, 2019, the Government of Canada posted the Ministerial Response Statements for these species on the Species at Risk Act (SARA) Public Registry. The Government is now launching public consultations on the potential amendment of Schedule 1, the List of Wildlife Species at Risk under SARA. The complete set of statements and the consultation path (normal or extended) for each species are available at: https://www.canada.ca/en/environment-climate- change/services/species-risk-act-accord-funding/listing-process/minister-environment-response-assessments- october-2018.html You are invited to submit comments on the potential impacts of amending the List of Wildlife Species at Risk according to these COSEWIC status assessments. Your comments will be considered and will inform the Minister’s recommendation to Cabinet. We ask to receive your comments by May 13, 2019 for species under a normal consultation process or by October 14, 2019 for species following an extended consultation path (the Common Nighthawk, the Olive-sided Flycatcher, and the Peregrine Falcon anatum/tundrius). There will also be an opportunity to provide comments during the 30-day public consultation period associated with pre- publication in Canada Gazette Part I. Five of the species included in this national consultation are found in British Columbia. These include: • Acuteleaf Small Limestone Moss: New listing as Endangered o A moss found in a few locations on Vancouver Island. • Smoker’s Lung Lichen: New listing as Threatened o A lichen occurring in three subpopulations in the Coastal Mountain Ranges and Interior Mountain Ranges of British Columbia.
    [Show full text]