DOCSLIB.ORG

AN UPDATED LIST of the ANTS (HYMENOPTERA FORMICIDAE) of OHIO KAL IVANOV DEPARTMENT of RECENT INVERTEBRATES; [email protected]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
AN UPDATED LIST of the ANTS (HYMENOPTERA FORMICIDAE) of OHIO KAL IVANOV DEPARTMENT of RECENT INVERTEBRATES; Kal.Ivanov@Vmnh.Virginia.Gov See discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324042927 ONHC 2018 Ants of Ohio Feb 24 2018 Poster · March 2018 DOI: 10.13140/RG.2.2.33148.44162 CITATIONS READS 0 145 1 author: Kaloyan Ivanov Virginia Museum of Natural History 38 PUBLICATIONS 185 CITATIONS SEE PROFILE Some of the authors of this publication are also working on these related projects: Ants of Virginia View project Ants of Ohio View project All content following this page was uploaded by Kaloyan Ivanov on 27 March 2018. The user has requested enhancement of the downloaded file. AN UPDATED LIST OF THE ANTS (HYMENOPTERA FORMICIDAE) OF OHIO KAL IVANOV DEPARTMENT OF RECENT INVERTEBRATES; [email protected] 1, 2, 8, 9, Introduction 10, 15, 16, 3, 6, 7, 18, 19, 21 In 2005, Coovert summarized all previously known information and published the first 8, 14 21 • 15 comprehensive list of the ants of Ohio • In the following thirteen years, a considerable amount of information has become available 16 as a result of survey work, as well as recent taxonomic descriptions and revisions Huron-Erie Lake 5, 14, 16 • Here I update Ohio’s list to accommodate 23 additional species, and 32 name changes in Plains 15, 16 species already on the list Glaciated Allegheny • The new additions are based on published accounts (13 species), museum databases (3 5 Plateau species), and newly collected material (7 species), (Table 1, Figs. 1 and 2) Till Plains • Two species, previously on the list, have been removed as a result of taxonomic changes Allegheny Plateau (Formica nitidiventris Emery), or because the records are likely based on misidentifications (Dorymyrmex insanus (Buckley)) 5 Species Accounts 5, 18 20 1, 8 Table 1. New additions to Ohio’s ant list. Distribution is given at the county level with source of materials in parenthesis. Species are arranged alphabetically by subfamily, genus and species. 5 22 4 Species Locality (source) 5, 14, 1, 5 DOILICHODERINAE 15, 16 1. Tapinoma melanocephalum (Fabricius) Butler, Cuyahoga, and Franklin Cos. (Ivanov 2016) FORMICINAE 5, 11, 12 2. Camponotus herculeanus (Linnaeus) Cuyahoga Co. (MCZENT567833) 3. Formica fusca Linnaeus Lucas Co. (Uno et al. 2010) 5, 13, 4. Formica biophilica Trager Morgan Co. (new data) Bluegrass 23 5. Formica incerta Buren Adams, Butler, Champaign, Delaware, Hamilton, Hocking, Jackson, and Region Montgomery Cos. (Trager et al. 2007); Ashland Co. (MCZENT672736, 672737); 5, 17 Summit Co. (new data) 6. Formica gynocrates Snelling and Buren Lucas Co. (Friedrich 2010) 7. Nylanderia arenivaga (Wheeler) Lucas Co. (S. Philpott unpubl.) 8. Nylanderia flavipes (Smith) Cuyahoga, Franklin, and Lake Cos. (Ivanov and Milligan 2008; Ivanov et al. 2011; Figure 2. Physiographic map of Ohio showing county level locations of Ohio’s new records (numbers Ivanov 2016); Lucas Co. (Uno et al. 2010) correspond to the species numbers used in the text). 9. Nylanderia terricola (Buckley) Cuyahoga Co. (new data) 10. Nylanderia vividula (Nylander) Franklin Co. (Kallal and LaPolla 2012); Cuyahoga Co. (new data) 11. Paratrechina longicornis (Latreille) Hamilton Co. (Hedges 1998) Summary MYRMICINAE 12. Cardiocondyla obscurior Wheeler Hamilton Co. (Ivanov 2016) 13. Harpagoxenus canadensis Smith Jackson Co. (FMNHINS113834) • 140 species from 34 genera, and 7 subfamilies now are reliably 14. Myrmica AF-eva Hocking, Lucas, and Summit Cos. (new data) reported from Ohio (Fig. 3) representing most of the North American 15. Myrmica AF-scu Cuyahoga, Geauga, Hocking, and Summit Cos. (new data) groups, with the exceptions of the more tropical Ectatomminae and 16. Myrmica AF-smi Cuyahoga and Medina Cos. (Ivanov and Keiper 2009, 2010, 2011; Ivanov et al. 2010); Erie, Hocking, and Summit Cos. (new data) Pseudomyrmicinae 17. Myrmica incompleta Provancher Adams Co. (Weber 1950) • More than 50 additional species have been reported from neighboring 18. Myrmica lobifrons Pergande Cuyahoga and Champaign Cos. (new data) regions and are thus likely to be encountered in the state 19. Myrmica semiparasitica Francoeur Cuyahoga Co. (Francoeur and Ivanov 2008; Ivanov and Keiper 2009, 2011; Ivanov et al. 2010) • An updated checklist of Ohio’s species is available as a supplement 20. Stenamma diecki Emery Licking Co. (MCZENT540382, 540383) 21. Strumigenys hyalina (Bolton) Ottawa Co. (Bolton 2000); Cuyahoga Co. (new data) 22. Strumigenys laevinasis Smith Greene Co. (new data) 70 (15) PROCERATIINAE 23. Proceratium crassicorne Emery Southcentral Ohio (Wesson and Wesson 1940) 60 (9) 50 40 30 Number of Species 20 10 (5) (1) (1) (2) (1) 0 Figure 1. General habitus of the new additions to Ohio’s ant fauna (Copyright © AntWeb, BoldSystems, and K. Ivanov) – T. melanocephalum (1); C. herculeanus (2); F. fusca (3); F. biophilica (4); F. incerta (5); F. gynocrates (6); N. arenivaga (7); N. flavipes (8); N. terricola (9); N. vividula (10); P. longicornis (11); C. obscurior (12); H. canadensis (13); M. AF-eva (14); M. AF- scu (15); M. AF-smi (16); M. incompleta (17); M. lobifrons (18); M. semiparasitica (19); S. diecki (20); S. hyalina (21); S. laevinasis (22); P. crassicorne (23). Figure 3. Generic and species diversity of Ohio’s ant fauna. Numbers in parentheses represent number of genera within a subfamily. View publication stats.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Diversity from the Lower Kennebec Valley Region of Maine
    J. Acad. Entomol. Soc. 8: 48-51 (2012) NOTE Formicidae [Hymenoptera] diversity from the Lower Kennebec Valley Region of Maine Gary D. Ouellette and André Francoeur Ants [Hymenoptera: Formicidae] occupy an important ecological position in most terrestrial habitats and have been investigated for evaluating the effects of ecosystem characteristics such as soil, vegetation, climate and habitat disturbance (Sanders et al., 2003; Rios-Casanova et al., 2006). At present, Maine’s myrmecofauna has not been extensively studied (Ouellette et al., 2010). Early in the 20th century, Wheeler (1908) presented results from a small survey of the Casco Bay region and Wing (1939) published a checklist of ant species recorded from the state. Both Procter (1946) and Ouellette et al. (2010) reported ant species surveyed from the Mount Desert Island region. The importance of expanding this knowledge base is highlighted by a recent discovery of the invasive ant species Myrmica rubra (Linnaeus) (Garnas 2004; Groden et al. 2005; Garnas et al. 2007; McPhee et al. 2012). The present study represents the first evaluation and characterization of Formicidae from a White Pine- Mixed Hardwoods Forest (WPMHF) ecosystem (Gawler & Cutko 2010) located in the lower Kennebec Valley region. The species reported here provide a baseline condition and a means for future biodiversity comparison. Fifteen study sites, located in the lower Kennebec Valley region, were sampled 1 to 8 times between May 1998 and July 2011 (Figure 1). Habitats comprised of a closed-canopy, WPMHF ecosystem covered by hemlock forests, mixed beech forests, red-oak-northern-hardwood-white pine-forests, and white pine mixed conifer forests.
    [Show full text]
  • Raid Organization and Behavioral Development in the Slave-Making Ant Polyergus Lucidus Mayr E
    Insectes Sociaux, Paris Masson, Paris, 1984 1984, Volume 31, n ~ 4, pp. 361-374 RAID ORGANIZATION AND BEHAVIORAL DEVELOPMENT IN THE SLAVE-MAKING ANT POLYERGUS LUCIDUS MAYR E. COOL-KWAIT (1) and H. TOPOFF (2) (1) Department of Biology, City College of Cuny, New York, N.Y. I003i, U.S.A. (2) Department of Psychology, Hunter College of Cuny, New York, N.Y. 10021, U.S.A and The American Museum of Natural History, New York, N.Y. 10024, U.S.A. Requ le 5 septembre 1983. Accept6 le 18 juin 1984. SUMMARY Mixed-species colonies of Polyergus lucidus and Fdrmica schaufussi xvere studied in New York. Slave raids were conducted in late afternoon, past the peak in diurnal temperature. Multiple raids on different Formica colonies xvere common, as ~vere re-raids on the same colony. In laboratory nests, about 75 % of the raided Formica brood was eaten. Of 27 days on ,which raids occurred in the laboratory, 25 ~vere on Formica nests scouted on the day of the raid. Polyergus scouts are among the oldest individuals in the colony, and call~ws do not participate in scouting during the entire season of their eclosion. The group of Polyergus workers that circle on the surface near the nest prior to raiding has a dynamic composition.. The most frequent behavioral transition ~vas from circling on one day to scouting on the next. The next most common change was from SCOUting to circling. The first scouting of the spring season occurred only one day after the appearance of Polyergus larvae. The first slave raid 'was conducted 4 days later.
    [Show full text]
  • A Thesis Entitled the Short-Term Impacts of Burning and Mowing on Prairie Ant Communities of the Oak Openings Region by Russell
    A Thesis entitled The Short-term Impacts of Burning and Mowing on Prairie Ant Communities of the Oak Openings Region by Russell L. Friedrich Submitted to the Graduate Faculty as partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology (Ecology track) ________________________________________________ Dr. Stacy Philpott, Committee Chair ________________________________________________ Dr. Jonathan Bossenbroek, Committee Member ________________________________________________ Dr. Daniel Pavuk, Committee Member ________________________________________________ Dr. Patricia Komuniecki, Dean College of Graduate Studies The University of Toledo May 2010 Copyright 2010, Russell L. Friedrich This document is copyrighted material. Under copyright law, no parts of this document may be reproduced without the expressed permission of the author. An Abstract of The Short-term Impacts of Land Management Techniques on Prairie Ant Communities by Russell L. Friedrich Submitted to the Graduate Faculty in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Biology (Ecology track) The University of Toledo May 2010 Controlled burning and mowing are among the most common forms of disturbance in prairie grasslands. Extensive studies on vegetative responses to fire, grazing, and mowing have been investigated, however, there is a lack of information on how animals and particularly insects are affected by these disturbances. Ants in particular play vital ecological roles in nutrient cycling, soil structure and turnover, predation, and seed dispersal, but few studies have assessed ant response to land management practices in prairie ecosystems. This research will assess the short-term impacts of controlled burning and mowing on ant communities. Ants were sampled in 17 prairie sites, divided into three treatments (burn, control, mow) within the Oak Openings Region in Ohio.
    [Show full text]
  • Five New Records of Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae)
    The Prairie Naturalist 44(1):63–65; 2012 FIVE NEW RECORDS OF ANTS (HYMENOPTERA: Formica incerta, F. montana, F. pallidefulva, Lasius FORMICIDAE) FOR NEBRASKA—Ants are ubiquitous interjectus, L. neoniger, Myrmica americana, M. and influential organisms in terrestrial ecosystems. About brevispinosa, Nylanderia parvula, Pheidole pilfera pilfera, 1,000 ant species occur in North America, where they are Ponera pennsylvanica, Prenolepis imparis, Solenopsis found in nearly every habitat (Fisher and Cover 2007). Ants molesta, and Tapinoma sessile. K. T. Nemec [KTN] are critical to ecological processes and structure. Ants collected all ant specimens. For each record, the person affect soils via tunneling activity (Baxter and Hole 1967), who determined the identity of the specimen is preceded by disperse plant seeds (Lengyel et al. 2009), prey upon a the abbreviation “det.” Voucher specimens are either variety of insects and other invertebrates (Way and Khoo located at the Nebraska State Museum [NSM] or with KTN. 1992, Folgarait 1998), are often effective primary Aphaenogaster rudis Enzmann is common in deciduous consumers through their prodigious consumption of floral woodlands and nests in soil, under stones or logs, in and especially extrafloral nectar, and honeydew (Tobin decaying wood, leaf litter, hollow stems of plants, or under 1994), and serve as prey for invertebrates (Gotelli 1996, bark at bases of trees (Smith 1979). Like most members of Gastreich 1999) and vertebrates (Reiss 2001). Aphaenogaster, it is not characteristic of prairies (Trager In Nebraska, ants have been the subject of relatively few 1998), but may be found in prairie remnants or restorations in-depth analyses, including theses (Bare 1929, Henzlik that are adjacent to deciduous trees (Kittelson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Akes an Ant an Ant? Are Insects, and Insects Are Arth Ropods: Invertebrates (Animals With­
    ~ . r. workers will begin to produce eggs if the queen dies. Because ~ eggs are unfertilized, they usually develop into males (see the discus­ : ~ iaplodiploidy and the evolution of eusociality later in this chapter). =- cases, however, workers can produce new queens either from un­ ze eggs (parthenogenetically) or after mating with a male ant. -;c. ant colony will continue to grow in size and add workers, but at -: :;oint it becomes mature and will begin sexual reproduction by pro· . ~ -irgin queens and males. Many specie s produce males and repro­ 0 _ " females just before the nuptial flight . Others produce males and ---: : ._ tive fem ales that stay in the nest for a long time before the nuptial :- ~. Our largest carpenter ant, Camponotus herculeanus, produces males _ . -:= 'n queens in late summer. They are groomed and fed by workers :;' 0 it the fall and winter before they emerge from the colonies for their ;;. ights in the spring. Fin ally, some species, including Monomoriurn : .:5 and Myrmica rubra, have large colonies with multiple que ens that .~ ..ew colonies asexually by fragmenting the original colony. However, _ --' e polygynous (literally, many queens) and polydomous (literally, uses, referring to their many nests) ants eventually go through a -">O=- r' sexual reproduction in which males and new queens are produced. ~ :- . ant colony thus functions as a highly social, organ ized "super­ _ _ " 1." The queens and mo st workers are safely hidden below ground : : ~ - ed within the interstices of rotting wood. But for the ant workers ~ '_i S ' go out and forage for food for the colony,'life above ground is - =- .
    [Show full text]
  • Report on Pitfall Trapping of Ants at the Biospecies Sites in the Nature Reserve of Orange County, California
    Report on Pitfall Trapping of Ants at the Biospecies Sites in the Nature Reserve of Orange County, California Prepared for: Nature Reserve of Orange County and The Irvine Co. Open Space Reserve, Trish Smith By: Krista H. Pease Robert N. Fisher US Geological Survey San Diego Field Station 5745 Kearny Villa Rd., Suite M San Diego, CA 92123 2001 2 INTRODUCTION: In conjunction with ongoing biospecies richness monitoring at the Nature Reserve of Orange County (NROC), ant sampling began in October 1999. We quantitatively sampled for all ant species in the central and coastal portions of NROC at long-term study sites. Ant pitfall traps (Majer 1978) were used at current reptile and amphibian pitfall trap sites, and samples were collected and analyzed from winter 1999, summer 2000, and winter 2000. Summer 2001 samples were recently retrieved, and are presently being identified. Ants serve many roles on different ecosystem levels, and can serve as sensitive indicators of change for a variety of factors. Data gathered from these samples provide the beginning of three years of baseline data, on which long-term land management plans can be based. MONITORING OBJECTIVES: The California Floristic Province, which includes southern California, is considered one of the 25 global biodiversity hotspots (Myers et al. 2000). The habitat of this region is rapidly changing due to pressure from urban and agricultural development. The Scientific Review Panel of the State of California's Natural Community Conservation Planning Program (NCCP) has identified preserve design parameters as one of the six basic research needs for making informed long term conservation planning decisions.
    [Show full text]
  • Wax Structures of Scymnus Louisianae Attenuate Aggression from Aphid-Tending Ants
    CHEMICAL ECOLOGY Wax Structures of Scymnus louisianae Attenuate Aggression From Aphid-Tending Ants EZRA G. SCHWARTZBERG,1,2 KENNETH F. HAYNES,1 DOUGLAS W. JOHNSON,1 1 AND GRAYSON C. BROWN Environ. Entomol. 39(4): 1309Ð1314 (2010); DOI: 10.1603/EN09372 ABSTRACT The cuticular wax structures of Scymnus louisianae J. Chapin larvae were investigated as a defense against ant aggression by Lasius neoniger Emery. The presence of wax structures provided signiÞcant defense against ant aggression compared with denuded larvae in that these structures attenuated the aggressive behavior of foraging ants. Furthermore, reapplication of wax dissolved in hexane partially restored defenses associated with intact structures, showing an attenuation of aggression based in part on cuticular wax components rather than solely on physical obstruction to ant mouthparts. KEY WORDS Scymnus louisianae, Aphis glycines, Lasius neoniger, ant-tending Many ants tend aphids and use the collected honeydew wax in promoting physical obstruction to the mouthparts as a sugar source. In return, the aphids beneÞt from the of aphid-tending ants, little has been done to elucidate tending ants (Way 1963, Ho¨lldobler and Wilson 1990). In the role that wax plays in eliciting avoidance behavior or these systems, aphids can beneÞt through reduced pre- in attenuating aggression. SpeciÞcally, physical or chem- dation (Banks 1962) and increased Þtness (Flatt and ical mimicry, camoußage, or repellency has not been Weisser 2000). The relationship between ants and aphids looked at as a potential means of avoidance of ant ag- is often a mutualistic one but ranges from obligatory to gression in the Scymnus beetles. It has been suggested facultative (Dixon 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution of Social Parasitism in Formica Ants Revealed by a Global Phylogeny – Supplementary Figures, Tables, and References
    The evolution of social parasitism in Formica ants revealed by a global phylogeny – Supplementary figures, tables, and references Marek L. Borowiec Stefan P. Cover Christian Rabeling 1 Supplementary Methods Data availability Trimmed reads generated for this study are available at the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (to be submit­ ted upon publication). Detailed voucher collection information, assembled sequences, analyzed matrices, configuration files and output of all analyses, and code used are available on Zenodo (DOI: 10.5281/zen­ odo.4341310). Taxon sampling For this study we gathered samples collected in the past ~60 years which were available as either ethanol­ preserved or point­mounted specimens. Taxon sampling comprises 101 newly sequenced ingroup morphos­ pecies from all seven species groups of Formica ants Creighton (1950) that were recognized prior to our study and 8 outgroup species. Our sampling was guided by previous taxonomic and phylogenetic work Creighton (1950); Francoeur (1973); Snelling and Buren (1985); Seifert (2000, 2002, 2004); Goropashnaya et al. (2004, 2012); Trager et al. (2007); Trager (2013); Seifert and Schultz (2009a,b); Muñoz­López et al. (2012); Antonov and Bukin (2016); Chen and Zhou (2017); Romiguier et al. (2018) and included represen­ tatives from both the New and the Old World. Collection data associated with sequenced samples can be found in Table S1. Molecular data collection and sequencing We performed non­destructive extraction and preserved same­specimen vouchers for each newly sequenced sample. We re­mounted all vouchers, assigned unique specimen identifiers (Table S1), and deposited them in the ASU Social Insect Biodiversity Repository (contact: Christian Rabeling, [email protected]).
    [Show full text]
  • Great Lakes Entomologist
    The GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Vol. 8, No. 4 Winter 1975 THE GREAT LAKES ENTOMOLOGIST Published by the Michigan Entomological Society Volume 8 1975 No. 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS A New Genus, Six New Species, and Records of Protura from Michigan Ernest C. Bernard .................................... 157 A New Species of Neelides (Collembola: Neelidae) from the United States Ernest C. Bernard ................................... 183 New Species and Additional Records of Protura from Michigan e Ernest C. Be'inard .................................... 187 Pesticide Effects on Orthopteroid Distribution in Southern Michigan Farmlands Benedict C. Pinkowski ....: ............................ 197 Heptageniidae (Ephemeroptera) of Wisconsin R. Wills Flowers and William L. Hilsenhoff .................... 201 Curculionidae and Chrysomelidae found in Aquatic Habitats in Wisconsin Lutz J. Bayer and H. Jane Brockman ......................... 219 Projected Red Pine Yields from Aldrin-treated and Untreated Stands Damaged by White Grubs and other Agents Richard F. Fowler and Louis F. Wilson ....................... 227 Genetic Variation in Resistance of.Scotch Pine to Zirnmerman Pine Moth Jonathan W. Wright, Louis F. Wilson and John N. Bright ............. 231 Abundance of Insects Inhabiting the Male Strobili of Red Pine William J. Mattson ................................... 237 Habitats and Populations of the Ant Stenamma diecki Emery in Southern Michigan Mary Talbot ....................................... 241 A List of the Ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) of the Edwin S. George Reserve, Livingston County, Michigan Mary Talbot ....................................... 245 COVER ILLUSTRATION Anterior portion of a Proturan, Amerentulus americanus (Ewing) (Protura: Acerento- midae), mounted and cleared. Photograph taken with Nomarski interference contrast optics by E. C. Bernard. X950. Vol. 8, No. 3 of The Great Lakes Entomologist was mailed October 24, 1975. THE MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY 1975-76 OFFICERS President David C.
    [Show full text]
  • The Spatial Distribution of Wood-Nesting Ants in the Central
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Gary R. Nielsen for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Botany and Plant Pathology presented on March 6, 1986. Title: The Spatial Distribution of Wood-Nesting Ants in the Central Coast Range of Oregon / 4 Abstractapproved: Redacted for privacy Fred okickson Two coniferous forests in the central Coast Range of western Oregon were surveyed for nests of wood inhabiting ants.Nineteen species and 825 ant nests were found, corresponding to an average nest density of 0.079 nests/m2 (maximum 0.38/m2) and a mean species density of 0.026 species/m2 (maximum 0.08/m2). The spatial distribution of all species was random within the study areas In contrast, the nest distribution patterns of the six most common species and all ants combined were found to be highly clumped (contagious) due to high nest densities on a few favorable sites. Most ants achieved greatest nest densities on high imsdlatim, early successional plots such as clear- cuts. The nest abundances of 15 species were negatively correlated with tree canopy cover. However, Lasius pallitarsis and Leptothorax nevadensis had higher nest densities in woody debrison forested plots. Furthermore, the nest densities of all ants combined, and of nine individual species were greater in stumps than logs. Within stumps, the nests of all species combined, as well as Camponotus modoc, Tapinoma sessile, and Lasius pallitarsis were concentratedon the south sides of stumps.The bark, cambial zone, and wood of woody debris in all stages of decompositionwere exploited by ants for nest sites. Leptothorax nevadensis, Tapinoma sessile, and Aphaenogaster subterranea occupied bark significantly more often than other tissues.
    [Show full text]
  • From Field to Fat
    From field to fat Integrating approaches to unveil use of trophic resources by tropical and temperate ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) vom Fachbereich Biologie der Technischen Universität Darmstadt zur Erlangung des Grades Doktor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) Dissertation von Félix Baumgarten Rosumek aus Blumenau, Brasilien Erstgutachterin: PD Dr. Michael Heethoff Zweitgutachter: Prof. Dr. Nico Blüthgen Darmstadt 2018 Rosumek, Félix Baumgarten: From field to fat – Integrating approaches to unveil use of trophic resources by tropical and temperate ant species (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) Darmstadt, Technische Universität Darmstadt, Jahr der Veröffentlichung der Dissertation auf TUprints: 2018 URN: urn:nbn:de:tuda-tuprints-81035 Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 12.10.2018 Veröffentlicht unter CC BY-SA 4.0 International https://creativecommons.org/licenses/ “It's a dangerous business, Frodo, going out your door. You step onto the road, and if you don't keep your feet, there's no knowing where you might be swept off to.” - Samwise Gamgee Table of contents 1. Summary 7 2. Zusammenfassung 9 3. Introduction 11 3.1. Getting the big picture: use of trophic resources and ecosystem functioning 11 3.2. Getting the focus: trophic biology of ants 13 3.3: Getting the answers: one method to rule them all? 17 3.4: Getting to work: resource use in tropical and temperate ants 18 4. Study sites 19 4.1. Brazil 19 4.2 Germany 20 5. Natural history of ants: what we (do not) know about trophic and temporal niches of Neotropical species 21 6. Patterns and dynamics of neutral lipid fatty acids in ants – implications for ecological studies 22 7.
    [Show full text]
  • View a Presentation
    A modest study on biodiversity in Hartford community gardens Premise: Urban gardens will be hotspots of biodiversity in an otherwise degraded urban landscape. Because Hartford has an extensive set of diverse community gardening sites, and because my CTP partner Lucia was keen on an insect project, we initiated a study, looking at ant and arthropod diversity in the city. Why diversity in gardens? Plant diversity – crops, weeds Structural diversity – e.g., corn, vining plants, trellis Moisture variability with extensive irrigation Pollinators attracted to long season of blooms Plant and woody debris Typical small garden LargeEarle garden Street - Knox Large Garden Earle Street Sampling scheme Sampled ants 3 dates Sampled for ants+arthropods 1 date - 3 large gardens (>5000 m2) - 3 matched “controls” (old field) - 3 small gardens (<600 m2) - 3 matched “controls” (turf) Units: Six 40 dram pitfalls per site per date. Analysis: Ant species identified for garden sites on 3 dates. Arthropod (morphospecies + ants) identified for garden sites and controls on Aug 24. The ants ca. 20 species Large and small gardens with similar species counts Common species Myrmica nr rubra Premolepis imparis “Rare” Formica incerta Crematogaster cerasi Extremes Camponotus chromaiodes Solenopsis Nylanderia sp. Manhattan Study - High stress medians: 21 species (!) - Urban forests 32 species Savage, A. M., Hackett, B., Guénard, B., Youngsteadt, E. K., Dunn, R. R. (2014), "Fine-scale heterogeneity across Manhattan's urban habitat mosaic is associated with variation in ant composition and richness." Insect Conservation and Diversity. Camponotus herculeanus Camponotus novaeboracensis We expect the same difference here. 2 species observed in Keney Park, and absent from all other urban sites.
    [Show full text]