DOCSLIB.ORG

The Costs and Benefits of Cass Sunstein Obama’S Longtime Friend Is Poised to Oversee Federal Rulemaking, Leaving Many Liberals Concerned

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Costs and Benefits of Cass Sunstein Obama’S Longtime Friend Is Poised to Oversee Federal Rulemaking, Leaving Many Liberals Concerned I N FO C U S The Costs and Benefits Of Cass Sunstein Obama’s longtime friend is poised to oversee federal rulemaking, leaving many liberals concerned BY REBECCA ADAMS siderable clout to the OIRA post, and observ- Last week brought much cheer to liber- ers expect he will make his imprint quickly als who anticipate a more aggressive regula- felt. “My prediction is that Cass will be one of tory posture from the new administration the most powerful OIRA heads,” said Richard than its predecessor. L. Revesz, dean of the New York University President Obama signed an executive or- School of Law, who has urged regulators to der that revoked changes to the regulatory account for the ethical impact of failing to review process that President George W. Bush protect future generations and whether rules instituted two years ago. The Bush order re- are needed to protect certain groups, such as quired federal agencies to submit more types the disadvantaged, from risks. of regulatory policies for review by the White Regulatory activists are anxious about what House Office of Management and Budget Sunstein will do with his power because his before they could be published, and it granted office has the authority to kill rules or force OMB’s political appointees increased author- agencies to rewrite them. And he clearly parts ity to get proposed rules rewritten. In addition company with several prominent Obama ap- to suspending those changes, Obama asked pointees in the White House and in the agen- OMB to produce the basis for a new rule-mak- cies his office will oversee. ing order within 100 days. One well-known detractor of the cost-ben- That’s the good news for liberals seeking a NEW RULEMAKER IN TOWN: Sunstein has liberal efit approach he favors is Lisa Heinzerling, critics worried. buffer between regulatory decisions and po- senior counsel to EPA Administrator Lisa P. litical prerogatives. On more fundamental nesses. Now liberal activists are worried that Jackson on climate change issues and the pre- questions of regulatory philosophy, however, policies produced under the regulatory review ferred candidate of many liberals for the OIRA liberals remain skittish about Cass R. Sunstein, process of the Bush years might remain sub- post. Heinzerling was an author of the legal Obama’s nominee to head OMB’s influential stantively intact. brief that persuaded the Supreme Court in Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. “I’m concerned about his ideas,” said Rena 2007 to order the EPA to decide whether to Sunstein, the president’s former University I. Steinzor, president of the Center for Progres- regulate greenhouse gases. And she has jousted of Chicago Law School colleague, has writ- sive Reform and a professor at the Univer- with Sunstein in academic writings for years ten extensively on federal policy making and sity of Maryland School of Law. “Industry is over how much regulatory weight should be endorsed some Bush-branded regulatory ini- thrilled with this nomination,” she said. “Their given to cost-benefit calculations. tiatives — the most controversial of which is pleasure is disturbing.” Likewise, many expect Sunstein to lock the use of cost-benefit analyses to evaluate Thanks to his friendship with Obama and horns with Carol M. Browner, the former proposed government rules. his academic standing, Sunstein brings con- Clinton EPA head named by Obama to a new Trying to balance government protections White House post of energy “czar,” overseeing for the public with the costs those safeguards climate and energy policies across a range of entail has limited usefulness, say some ad- My prediction is agencies. Browner, too, tends to stress risk vocates of increased regulation, because it’s “that Cass will be one reduction over cost issues. too difficult to quantify all benefits. But the “Just stay tuned and watch for the nuclear process was elevated under the term of John of the most powerful explosion when Carol Browner and Cass have D. Graham, OIRA administrator from 2001 lunch for the first time because they come out to 2006. Graham’s critics say he used that tool OIRA heads. of such different camps,” said Peter Van Doren, and others to roll back regulatory initiatives — Richard L. Revesz, dean, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute, a libertar- BLOOMBERG NEWS/HARVARD LAW SCHOOL ” that were deemed harmful to affected busi- New York University School of Law ian think tank. Van Doren edits the institute’s www.cq.com | FEBRUARY 9, 2009 | CQ WEEKLY 293 I N FO C U S quarterly magazine Regulation, which has pub- that Sunstein may push for more disclo- CASS R. SUNSTEIN lished some of Sunstein’s writings. sure on many issues — as he’s advocated in On big issues, officials typically coordinate Born: September 21, 1954 “Nudge” and elsewhere — rather than strict with the White House to ensure they are pur- Family: Married Samantha Power, his regulatory mandates and will review how the suing policies in concert with the president’s second wife, in 2008; one child, Ellyn, United States’ regulatory regime matches up priorities. But OIRA administrators also tra- with first wife, Lisa Ruddick with European policy. ditionally have discretion to flesh out details Education: A.B., Harvard College, 1975; J.D., Harvard Law School, 1978 with agency heads, especially on lower-profile SIZING UP REGULATORY BURDENS rules. Career: Clerk for Massachusetts Sunstein has said that agencies may regu- OIRA’s wonky handiwork can also be a very Supreme Court Justice Benjamin late even when costs are higher than benefits, Kaplan, 1978-79, and for Supreme powerful tool in a modern president’s political but he also often notes regulation’s burden. Court Justice Thurgood Marshall, arsenal, since it occurs beyond the often harsh In 2004, for example, he published a critique 1979-80; attorney-adviser in the scrutiny of congressional debate. While Obama Justice Department’s Office of Legal in the New Republic of a book coauthored enjoys strong Democratic majorities in both Counsel, 1980-81; professor at the by Heinzerling, “Priceless: On Knowing the chambers of Congress, he is also likely to insti- University of Chicago Law School from Price of Everything and the Value of Noth- tute some significant policies via rulemaking 1981 to 2008 and in the university’s ing,” which savaged her view that “better safe rather than forcing tough congressional votes. Department of Political Science begin- than sorry” is the best guiding principle in What’s more, OIRA will be quite busy in the ning in 1983; visiting professor at environmental regulation. Sunstein called months ahead conducting regulatory reviews Columbia Law School in 1986 and at that principle “worse than unhelpful; it is ut- of Bush policies that Obama wants to reverse Harvard Law School in 1987; returned terly incoherent.” and resolving unfinished regulatory business to Harvard Law in 2008; nominated Keeping some medicines off the market for OIRA administrator by President bequeathed by the Bush White House — in because of their safety risks might prevent Obama in January 2009. environmental affairs, most notably. some deaths, but lead to others, Sunstein Sunstein is prolific, with more than 450 wrote in his review of “Priceless.” Likewise, academic publications and books to his name. creased regulation, because Obama has clearly he has suggested that banning genetically His views don’t skew clearly in any single ide- signaled that he regards OIRA’s mandate as a modified food might prevent some unknown ological direction; he advocates for greater work in progress. When Obama called for a risk, but introduce other risks by limiting the aid to the poor, for example, but via indirect new approach to regulatory review, he used food supply. More-fuel-efficient cars might mechanisms such as tax credits. Some of his words that suggested more than cosmetic lead to vehicles that are lighter and less safe work seems intentionally provocative — for tweaks. Revoking the earlier Bush process than gas-guzzlers, he wrote — or else make example, he published an article last year in restored the regulatory regime handed down cars so costly that more people would hang the Virginia Law Review called “Is OSHA Un- from President Bill Clinton — which Obama onto older models. constitutional?” also intends to review. Advocates such as Heinzerling “do not suf- Sunstein’s latest book, which draws from In a memo to the heads of Cabinet-level ficiently appreciate the risk that expensive the increasingly popular discipline of behav- agencies, Obama said that since the Clinton regulation will actually hurt real people,” Sun- ioral economics, is titled: “Nudge: Improving policy was created in 1993, much has been stein wrote. “Most of the time environmental Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Hap- learned about when regulations are justified questions do not involve evildoers or sins. piness.” In it, he argues that people in power and what works. In his directive to OMB, They involve complex questions about how can shepherd the public toward preferred out- Obama singled out issues that he wants ex- to control risks that stem both from nature comes without having to resort to top-down amined, including how OIRA interacts with and from mostly beneficial products, such as mandates. Instead, he says, policy should aim agencies it oversees, ways to speed up the automobiles, cell phones, household appli- for favored results as the most attractive in a process of writing regulations, and the role of ances, and electricity,” he wrote. range of options. cost-benefit analysis and behavioral sciences, Sunstein’s allies suggest that he will bring a “Some groups claim he’s not progressive two areas of Sunstein’s expertise. pragmatic, hard-nosed outlook to an Obama enough because he believes in economics,” The president wants “a process that bases White House that will be struggling with how said Kip Viscusi, an economist at Vanderbilt decisions on solid information and analysis best to make good on pledges to transcend University who devised a measure for valu- of what’s in the best interests of the country,” former partisan rancor and institute real- ing a life that has been widely employed in said OMB spokesman Tom Gavin.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A New Progressivism Cass R
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics Economics 2005 A New Progressivism Cass R. Sunstein Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/law_and_economics Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Cass R. Sunstein, "A New Progressivism" (John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 245, 2005). This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHICAGO JOHN M. OLIN LAW & ECONOMICS WORKING PAPER NO. 245 (2D SERIES) A New Progressivism Cass R. Sunstein THE LAW SCHOOL THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO May 2005 This paper can be downloaded without charge at: The Chicago Working Paper Series Index: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/Lawecon/index.html and at the Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection: http://ssrn.com/abstract_id=726443 A New Progressivism Cass R. Sunstein* Abstract Based on an address for a conference on Law and Transformation in South Africa, this paper explores problems with two twentieth-century approaches to government: the way of markets and the way of planning. It urge that the New Progressivism simultaneously offers (1) a distinctive conception of government’s appropriate means, an outgrowth of the late-twentieth-century critique of economic planning, and (2) a distinctive understanding of government’s appropriate ends, an outgrowth of evident failures with market arrangements and largely a product of the mid-twentieth-century critique of laissez faire.
    [Show full text]
  • Animals and Ethics Fall, 2017, P
    Philosophy 174a Ethics and Animals Fall 2017 Instructor: Teaching Fellow: Chris Korsgaard Ahson Azmat 205 Emerson Hall [email protected] [email protected] Office Hours: Mondays 1:30-3:30 Description: Do human beings have moral obligations to the other animals? If so, what are they, and why? Should or could non-human animals have legal rights? Should we treat wild and domestic animals differently? Do human beings have the right to eat the other animals, raise them for that purpose on factory farms, use them in experiments, display them in zoos and circuses, make them race or fight for our entertainment, make them work for us, and keep them as pets? We will examine the work of utilitarian, Kantian, and Aristotelian philosophers, and others who have tried to answer these questions. This course, when taken for a letter grade, meets the General Education requirement for Ethical Reasoning. Sources and How to Get Them: Many of the sources from we will be reading from onto the course web site, but you will need to have copies of Singer’s Animal Liberation, Regan’s The Case for Animal Rights, Mill’s Utilitarianism and Coetzee’s The Lives of Animals. I have ordered all the main books from which we will be reading (except my own book, which is not yet published) at the Coop. The main books we will be using are: Animal Liberation, by Peter Singer. Updated edition, 2009, by Harper Collins Publishers. The Case for Animal Rights, by Tom Regan. University of California Press, 2004. Fellow Creatures: Our Obligations to the Other Animals, by Christine M.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter to President Barack Obama
    September 12, 2014 President Barack Obama The White House Washington, DC 20500 CHAIR CC: Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel Human Rights Watch National Security Advisor Susan Rice 1630 Connecticut Ave. NW Under Secretary of State Rose Gottemoeller Suite 500 Ambassador Samantha Power Washington, DC 20009 Phone: (202) 612-4351 Fax: (202) 612-4375 Re: 1997 Mine Ban Treaty [email protected] www.banminesusa.org STEERING Dear Mr. President: COMMITTEE I am writing on behalf of the US Campaign to Ban Landmines, a nationwide American Task Force for Lebanon coalition of non-governmental organizations, with respect to the new US policy on landmines announced on June 27. Amnesty International USA Arms Control Association Center for Civilians in Conflict The US Campaign to Ban Landmines views the recent US statement of intent to join the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty in the future and its commitment not to produce Evangelical Lutheran Church in America or acquire antipersonnel landmines ever again as positive steps in the right Friends Committee on National direction. Nonetheless, we feel strongly that additional measures are needed Legislation to ensure that landmines are never used again by the US or others. Landmines Blow! Legacies of War We understand the policy review is ongoing, and would like to suggest a Physicians for Human Rights number of steps the Obama administration should undertake as it concludes the review. Handicap International-USA Human Rights Watch Most notably, under the new policy, the US still reserves the right to use its Jesuit Refugee Service/USA stockpiled antipersonnel mines anywhere in the world until they expire within Mennonite Central Committee U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Rattling the Cage Defended Steven M
    Boston College Law Review Volume 43 Article 2 Issue 3 Number 3 5-1-2002 Rattling the Cage Defended Steven M. Wise Follow this and additional works at: http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr Part of the Animal Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Steven M. Wise, Rattling the Cage Defended, 43 B.C.L. Rev. 623 (2002), http://lawdigitalcommons.bc.edu/bclr/vol43/iss3/2 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law Journals at Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. It has been accepted for inclusion in Boston College Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ Boston College Law School. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RATTLING THE CAGE DEFENDED STEVEN M. WISE* Abstract: In Rattling the Cage: Toward Levi Rights for Animals, the author advocated basic legal rights—specifically common law rights—for chimpanzees, bonobos, and other nonhuman animals. In this Article, the author responds to many of the major criticisms of Rattling the Cage. The author confronts critics of his historical arguments for legal rights for nonhuman animals, tracing those arguments through ancient philosophy and nineteenth century English statutes. The author also expands upon his legal arguments for animal rights, reexamining various theories of rights and justifications for treating animals as property, Finally, borrowing from his upcoming book Drawing the Line: Science and The Case for Animal Rights, the author defends his advocacy of legal rights for nonhuman animals based on the relative autonomy nonhuman animals possess. INTRODUCTION "The 'animal rights' movement is gathering steam and Steven Wise is one of the pistons."l Thus Judge Richard Posner began a Yale Law Journal review of my book, Rattling the Cage: Toward Legal Rights for Animals, published in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • An Inquiry Into Animal Rights Vegan Activists' Perception and Practice of Persuasion
    An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion by Angela Gunther B.A., Simon Fraser University, 2006 Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Arts in the School of Communication ! Angela Gunther 2012 SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY Summer 2012 All rights reserved. However, in accordance with the Copyright Act of Canada, this work may be reproduced, without authorization, under the conditions for “Fair Dealing.” Therefore, limited reproduction of this work for the purposes of private study, research, criticism, review and news reporting is likely to be in accordance with the law, particularly if cited appropriately. Approval Name: Angela Gunther Degree: Master of Arts Title of Thesis: An Inquiry into Animal Rights Vegan Activists’ Perception and Practice of Persuasion Examining Committee: Chair: Kathi Cross Gary McCarron Senior Supervisor Associate Professor Robert Anderson Supervisor Professor Michael Kenny External Examiner Professor, Anthropology SFU Date Defended/Approved: June 28, 2012 ii Partial Copyright Licence iii Abstract This thesis interrogates the persuasive practices of Animal Rights Vegan Activists (ARVAs) in order to determine why and how ARVAs fail to convince people to become and stay veg*n, and what they might do to succeed. While ARVAs and ARVAism are the focus of this inquiry, the approaches, concepts and theories used are broadly applicable and therefore this investigation is potentially useful for any activist or group of activists wishing to interrogate and improve their persuasive practices. Keywords: Persuasion; Communication for Social Change; Animal Rights; Veg*nism; Activism iv Table of Contents Approval ............................................................................................................................. ii! Partial Copyright Licence .................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Animal Rights
    Book Review Animal Rights Richard A. Posner' Rattling the Cage: Toward Legal Rightsfor Animals. By Steven M. Wise. Cambridge,Mass.: PerseusBooks, 2000. Pp. 362. $25.00. The "animal rights" movement is gathering steam, and Steven Wise is one of the pistons. A lawyer whose practice is the protection of animals, he has now written a book in which he urges courts in the exercise of their common-law powers of legal rulemaking to confer legally enforceable rights on animals, beginning with chimpanzees and bonobos (the two most intelligent primate species).' Although Wise is well-informed about his subject-the biological as well as legal aspects-this is not an intellectually exciting book. I do not say this in criticism. Remember who Wise is: a practicing lawyer who wants to persuade the legal profession that courts should do much more to protect animals. Judicial innovation proceeds incrementally; as Holmes put it, the courts, in their legislative capacity, "are confined from molar to molecular motions."2 Wise's practitioner's perspective is, as we shall see, both the strength and the weakness of the book. f Judge, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit; Senior Lecturer, University of Chicago Law School. I thank Michael Boudin, Richard Epstein, Lawrence Lessig, Martha Nussbaum, Charlene Posner, and Cass Sunstein for their very helpful comments on a previous draft of this Review. * Adjunct Professor, John Marshall Law School; Adjunct Professor, Vermont Law School; President, Center for the Expansion of Fundamental Rights; Partner, Wise & Slater-Wise, Boston. 1. These are closely related species, and Wise discusses them more or less interchangeably.
    [Show full text]
  • The Use of Philosophers by the Supreme Court Neomi Raot
    A Backdoor to Policy Making: The Use of Philosophers by the Supreme Court Neomi Raot The Supreme Court's decisions in Vacco v Quill' and Wash- ington v Glucksberg2 held that a state can ban assisted suicide without violating the Due Process or Equal Protection Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment. In these high profile cases, six phi- losophers filed an amicus brief ("Philosophers'Brief') that argued for the recognition of a constitutional right to die.3 Although the brief was written by six of the most prominent American philoso- phers-Ronald Dworkin, Thomas Nagel, Robert Nozick, John Rawls, Thomas Scanlon, and Judith Jarvis Thomson-the Court made no mention of the brief in unanimously reaching the oppo- site conclusion.4 In light of the Court's recent failure to engage philosophical arguments, this Comment examines the conditions under which philosophy does and should affect judicial decision making. These questions are relevant in considering the proper role of the Court in controversial political questions and are central to a recent de- bate focusing on whether the law can still be considered an autonomous discipline that relies only on traditional legal sources. Scholars concerned with law and economics and critical legal studies have argued that the law is no longer autonomous, but rather that it does and should draw on many external sources in order to resolve legal disputes. Critics of this view have main- tained that legal reasoning is distinct from other disciplines, and that the law has and should maintain its own methods, conven- tions, and conclusions. This Comment follows the latter group of scholars, and ar- gues that the Court should, as it did in the right-to-die cases, stay clear of philosophy and base its decisions on history, precedent, and a recognition of the limits of judicial authority.
    [Show full text]
  • Samantha Power: Inspire Action Against Indifference
    THE ECHO FOUNDATION Presents Samantha Power: Inspire Action Against Indifference Student Dialogue March 12, 2018 Hosted at Providence Day School 5800 Sardis Road Charlotte, North Carolina THE ECHO FOUNDATION 1125 E. Morehead St., Suite 101 Charlotte, NC 28204 The Echo Foundation 1 Inspire Action Against Indifference The Echo Foundation devotes this year’s study to the capacity for an individual to reshape the world against systemic indifference. Inspired by Samantha Power’s relentless dedication to securing human rights for the most vulnerable populations and nations, Inspire Action Against Indifference honors the rights endowed to every human life. Developed by Echo student interns, this curriculum guide offers educators and students alike a user-friendly tool with which to understand global atrocities, as well as what we, as a nation and as individuals, can do to stop them. The Echo Foundation offers these resource materials and collection of essays as an inspiration to you who shape the next generation. We challenge you to search each day for opportunities to weave lessons of compassion, respect for all people, and ethical decision making into every subject area; to teach children not to be indifferent to the suffering of others and to take a stand for justice; to believe in themselves, that they too have the power to make a difference… indeed, that it is their moral obligation to do so. Stephanie G. Ansaldo Founder and President The Echo Foundation 2 Inspire Action Against Indifference Samantha Power: Inspire Action Against Indifference Photo courtesy of Harvard Kennedy School “Our obligation is to give meaning to life and in doing so to overcome the passive, indifferent life” – Nobel Laureate for Peace, Elie Wiesel Photo Courtesy of yadvashem.org The Echo Foundation 3 Inspire Action Against Indifference Foreword I was a Balkan child raised in Serbia until the age of 11, at which time I moved to the United States with my family.
    [Show full text]
  • Society Register
    ISSN 2544-5502 SOCIETY REGISTER 3 (3) 2019 Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan ISSN 2544-5502 SOCIETY REGISTER 3 (3) 2019 Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznan SOCIETY REGISTER 2019 / Vol. 3, No. 3 ISSN: 2544-5502 | DOI: 10.14746/sr EDITORIAL TEAM: Mariusz Baranowski (Editor-in-Chief), Marcos A. Bote (Social Policy Editor), Piotr Cichocki (Quantitative Research Editor), Sławomir Czapnik (Political Science Editor), Piotr Jabkowski (Statistics Editor), Mark D. Juszczak (International Relations), Agnieszka Kanas (Stratification and Inequality Editor), Magdalena Lemańczyk (Anthropology Editor), Urszula Markowska-Manista (Educational Sciences Editor), Bartosz Mika (Sociology of Work Editor), Kamalini Mukherjee (English language Editor), Krzysztof Nowak-Posadzy (Philoso- phy Editor), Anna Odrowąż-Coates (Deputy Editor-in-Chief), Aneta Piektut (Migration Editor). POLISH EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS: Agnieszka Gromkowska-Melosik, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (Poland); Kazimierz Krzysztofek, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities (Poland); Roman Leppert, Kazimierz Wielki University (Poland); Renata Nowakowska-Siuta, ChAT (Poland); Inetta Nowosad, University of Zielona Góra (Poland); Ewa Przybylska, Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń (Poland); Piotr Sałustowicz, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities (Poland); Bogusław Śliwerski, University of Lodz (Poland); Aldona Żurek, Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (Poland). INTERNATIONAL EDITORIAL BOARD MEMBERS: Tony Blackshaw, Sheffield Hallam University (United King- dom); Theodore Chadjipadelis, Aristotle University Thessaloniki (Greece); Kathleen J. Farkas, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (US); Sribas Goswami, Serampore College, University of Calcutta (India); Bozena Hautaniemi, Stockholm University (Sweden); Kamel Lahmar, University of Sétif 2 (Algeria); Georg Kam- phausen, University of Bayreuth (Germany); Nina Michalikova, University of Central Oklahoma (US); Jaroslaw Richard Romaniuk, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio (US); E.
    [Show full text]
  • The US Government's Global Health Policy Architecture
    U.S. GLOBAL HEALTH POLICY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S GLOBAL HEALTH POLICY ARCHITECTURE: Structure, Programs, and Funding April 2009 U.S. GLOBAL HEALTH POLICY THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S GLOBAL HEALTH POLICY ARCHITECTURE: Structure, Programs, and Funding April 2009 Jen Kates Kaiser Family Foundation Julie Fischer Stimson Center Eric Lief Stimson Center Acknowledgments The development of this report was informed by discussions with several individuals, including an ongoing dialogue with J. Stephen Morrison of the Center for Strategic & International Studies (CSIS) regarding the formation of the CSIS Commission on Smart Global Health Policy; Phillip Nieburg, Centers for Strategic & International Studies; Ruth Levine, Center for Global Development; and Erin Thornton, ONE Campaign In addition, much of the data used in this analysis were collected through a contract with the Stimson Center, under the direction of Julie Fischer and Eric Lief, with their colleague, Vidal Seegobin. This report was supported in part by a grant from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY _______________________________________________________________ 1 INTRODUCTION _____________________________________________________________________ 3 DEFINING THE SCOPE AND ROLE OF THE U.S. GOVERNMENT’S GLOBAL HEAlth ENGAGEMENT ______________________________________________________ 4 U.S. GOVERNMENT FUNDING FOR GLOBAL HEAlth ____________________________________ 5 MAJOR GOVERNING STATUTES, AUTHORITIES, AND POLICIES FOR U.S. GLOBAL HEAlth ___________________________________________________________
    [Show full text]
  • Successes and Failures in the Enactment of Humanitarian Intervention During the Obama Administration
    “THE ROAD TO HELL AND BACK”: SUCCESSES AND FAILURES IN THE ENACTMENT OF HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION DURING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION A Thesis submitted to the FaCulty of the Graduate SChool of Arts and SCiences of Georgetown University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in ConfliCt Resolution By Justine T. Robinson, B.A. Washington, DC DeCember 10, 2020 Copyright 2020 by Justine T. Robinson All Rights Reserved ii “THE ROAD TO HELL AND BACK”: SUCCESSES AND FAILURES IN THE ENACTMENT OF HUMANITARIAN INTERVENTION DURING THE OBAMA ADMINISTRATION Justine T. Robinson, M.A. Thesis Advisor: Andrew Bennett, Ph.D. ABSTRACT This thesis examines how United States presidential administrations change over time in their poliCies on humanitarian intervention. More speCifiCally, how and why do AmeriCan presidential administrations (and the offiCials in those administrations) fail in some cases and sucCeed in others in enaCting ConfliCt resolution and genocide preventative measures? This thesis will focus on why offiCials in the two Obama administration sometimes used ambitious means of humanitarian intervention to prevent or mitigate genocide and other mass atrocities, as in the Cases of Libya and the Yazidis in Iraq, and sometimes took only limited steps to aChieve humanitarian goals, as in the case of the Syrian Civil War and Syrian refugees. This thesis is partiCularly interested in cases where earlier Obama administration aCtions and outComes forced the president and his advisors to rethink their approaCh to potential humanitarian intervention cases. The central hypothesis of this thesis is that poliCy changes on humanitarian intervention over time within U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Obama Years
    Resenha Rev. Conj. Aust. | v.11, n.55 | jul./set. 2020 Foreign Policy in the real world: the Obama years Política Externa no mundo real: os anos Obama DOI: https://doi.org/10.22456/2178-8839.107689 Joseph Marques Webster University, Geneva, Switzerland [email protected] Abstract This review essay examines three books written by senior former Obama administration members - Susan Rice, Samantha Power, and Ben Rhodes. It highlights how the authors manage to present many of the Obama administration's internal debates, as well as reveal the limitations of its foreign policy. RICE, Susan. Tough Love: My Story of the Things Worth Fighting For. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2019, 544p., ISBN: 978-1-50118-997-5. POWER, Samantha. The Education of an Idealist: A Memoir. London: Dey Street Books, 2019, 592p., ISBN: 978-0-06282-069-3. RHODES, Ben. The World as It Is: A Memoir of the Obama White House. New York: Random House, 2018, 428p. ISBN: 978-0-52550-935-6. Keywords: Obama; American Foreign Policy; Susan Rice; Ben Rhodes; Samantha Power. Resumo Esta resenha apresenta a análise de três livros escritos por ex-assessores seniores do governo Obama - Susan Rice, Samantha Power e Ben Rhodes. A resenha sublinha como os autores conseguem apresentar muitos dos debates internos daquela administração, bem como revela as limitações de sua política externa. ICE, Susan. Tough Love: My Story of the Things Worth Fighting For. New York: Simon & Schuster, 2019, 544p., ISBN: 978-1-50118-997-5. POWER, Samantha. The Education of an Idealist: A Memoir. London: Dey Street Books, 2019, 592p., ISBN: 978-0-06282-069-3.
    [Show full text]