Arxiv:1610.07839V3 [Gr-Qc]

Role of evaporation in gravitational collapse Valentina Baccetti,1 Robert B. Mann,2, 3 and Daniel R. Terno1 1Department of Physics & Astronomy, Macquarie University, Sydney NSW 2109, Australia 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada 3Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada We investigate the possibility that quantum effects responsible for black hole radiation do not allow for horizon crossing of gravitationally collapsing matter in a finite time as seen by distant observers. We consider this in the context of the collapse of evaporating massive thin dust shells using two families of metrics to describe the exterior geometry: the outgoing Vaidya metric and the retarded Schwarzschild metric. We describe how this hypothesis results in a modified equation of motion for the shell. In each case the collapse is accelerated due to evaporation, but the Schwarzschild radius is not crossed. Instead the shell is always at a certain sub-Planckian distance from this would-be horizon that depends only on the mass and evaporation rate, while a comoving observer encounters firewall-like energy density and flux with a natural cutoff. I. INTRODUCTION formed. Nonetheless, a spacetime region containing the horizon of even a large black hole would still be non-classical. According to the clock of a distant observer (Bob at spa- The collapse speed-up implies that either a test particle that tial infinity), collapse of a matter distribution into a black hole trails just behind the collapsing matter will also cross the fully takes an infinite amount of time. The final stage of a collapse formed horizon in a finite coordinate time, or the “original” is crossing of the event horizon — boundary of the spacetime matter for some reason behaves differently from everything region from which no signal can escape. According to the co- else. Since derivations of the Hawking radiation do not as- moving observer (Alice) it lasts only a finite amount of time. sume exotic background structures [3–6], investigations of its These are the standard results of classical general relativity logical consequences [11] should not assume them either. [1]. If quantum effects do not facilitate such collapse, evaporation must start when the collapsing matter is sufficiently close However the notion of an event horizon also plays a key to its Schwarzschild radius. Arguments that the collapse ac- role in quantum models of black holes [2–5]. If Hawking ra- cording to Bob is never complete and overlaps with the onset diation [3–6] exists [7] and its late-time effects are described of Hawking radiation that begins when the collapsing matter by Page’s formula [4, 5, 8], only a finite amount of Bob’s time concentrates near the gravitational radius, have been made be- elapses until the black hole evaporates. Black hole radiation fore [13–15]. Numerical studies of collapsing shells [16] and can be derived in a number of ways [3–5, 9], each typically analytic results [17–20] support this idea. based on three basic assumptions [9]: (i) the gravitational field is treated as a classical background; (ii) the backreaction of the Accepting the overlap between collapse and evaporation created matter on the spacetime geometry is neglected, at least presents the same alternative: either quantum effects respon- at the first stage of the analysis; (iii) field(s) of the emitted ra- sible for black hole radiation allow for the horizon crossing diation are distinct from the collapsing matter. Positivity of (however properly defined in the quantum case) in finite time the resulting steady-state energy flux at infinity, conservation for Bob or they do not. In the latter case the alleged loss of of energy, and the relationships between event horizon area information, at least in a sense of its disappearance througha and mass for stationary black holes lead to a conclusion of a horizon [4, 5, 10, 21], never arises [20, 22–24]. steady decrease of the horizon and provide a way to describe We explore the consequences of pre-Hawking radiation the changing spacetime geometry. and present several consistent scenarios where the second pos- arXiv:1610.07839v3 [gr-qc] 26 Jun 2017 Hawking radiation precipitates the black hole information sibility — no horizon — is realized. In Section II we discuss problem. Crossing of the event horizon by the collapsing mat- considerations leading to our models, their specific assump- ter and restoration (or the alleged non-restoration) of correla- tions as well as review the classical aspects of a thin shell tions during the evaporation provide ingredients for the para- collapse. Section III presents several detailed examples. We dox [2, 4, 5, 9–13]. We focus on consistency of these two conclude with the discussion of their applicability, general- elements since there is an apparent causal contradiction: in- ity and implications in Section IV. Appendices provide all the necessary calculational details. We use ( + ++) signature finite collapse time vs. finite subsequent evaporation time as ~ − perceived by Bob. of the metric and set c = = G = kB =1. There are two alternatives for the final stages of the collapse: either quantum effects facilitate a finite-time collapse — crossing of a suitably defined event horizon within a finite II. GENERAL CONSIDERATIONS amount of Bob’s time — or they do not. Both can restore the causal order. There is a useful hierarchyof models that describe the inter- If quantum effects lead to a finite-time collapse (accord- play between quantum mechanics and gravity. Relevant mod- ing to the distant Bob), then there is no logical necessity in els begin with quantum field theory on a curved background emitting pre-Hawking radiation before the event horizon is and advance through semiclassical stochastic gravity [25] and 2 different effective field theories of matter-gravity systems [26] where g = det gµν and W is the effective action of quantum to a full theory of quantum gravity in whatever form it takes fields [3], but only partial results are known for dynamical [2]. Black holes are discussed at each level of this hierarchy. spacetimes. Appearances of strongly non-classical regions, both deep Below we illustrate the consequences of the Assumptions within appropriately defined quantum black holes and outside 1-4 in two examples. We discuss a generic spherically- the Schwarzschild radius [9, 27, 28] are expected. Neverthe- symmetric setting in [30]. less, the classical event horizon and quantum states that are associated with it play an important role in the quantum black hole models. Moreover, whatever reservations can be raised A. Themodel against the semiclassical picture of black hole creation, radiation and evaporation, they are still the only ones that are fully solvable. Hence investigations of the event horizon crossing We consider collapse of a massive spherically-symmetric thin dust shell Σ [31] in D+1 dimensional spacetime, D 3. within the semi-classical framework are important to establish ≥ its consistency and delineate its limitations. Appendix A summarizes the relevant conventions and defini- tions. Our treatment of this model is based on the following assumptions: The spacetime inside the shell is flat [31]. In the absence of Hawking radiation the metric 1. The classical spacetime structure is still meaningful and 2 2 −1 2 2 ds+ = f(r+)dt+ + f(r+) dr+ + r+dΩD−1 (3) is described by a metric gµν . − 2 2 = f(r+)du+ 2du+dr+ + r+dΩD−1, (4) 2. Classical concepts, such as trajectory, event horizon or − − singularity can be used. where f(r) =1 C/rD−2 describes the exterior geome- − try in terms of standard coordinates (t+, r+) and outgoing Assumption 1 leaves out the spacetime fluctuations. Within Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates (u+, r+). Here and in the this framework there are no restrictions on the applicability following dt+ = du+ + dr+/f(r+), and dΩD−1 is the spher- of classical concepts even, e.g., within the sub-Planckian dis- ical volume element. Their counterparts in the Minkowski tance from the Schwarzschild radius. While this is a stronger spacetime inside the shell are (t−, r−) and (u−, r−), where 1/(D−2) assumption than just validity of the classical description out- u− = t− r−. The Schwarzschild radius rg := C side the stretched horizon [4, 5, 27], it is consistent with the [32] is the− solution of f(r)=0. In three spatial dimensions goal of testing accessibility of an infinitely sharp classical C =2M = rg. event horizon. Moreover, while this assumption is not usu- The shell’s trajectory is parameterized by its proper time τ ally emphasized, it underlines many discussions of the Hawk- (time of a comoving observer Alice) as T±(τ), R±(τ) or ing radiation and related problems. Specifically, the standard U±(τ), R±(τ) using, respectively, (t, r) or (u, r) coordi- Penrose diagram of the creation of a black hole from the in- nates outside and inside the shell. falling matter with subsequent evaporation makes sense only The first junction condition [31, 33], which is the statement if both Assumptions 1 and 2 are accepted [29]. that the induced metric h is the same on the both sides of We furthermore assume ab the shell Σ, ds2 = h dyadyb = dτ 2 + R2dΩ − , leads to Σ ab − D 1 3. The collapse leads to a pre-Hawking radiation. the identification R+ R− =: R(τ). Trajectories of shell’s particles are timelike,≡ so 4. The metric is modified by quantum effects. The result- 2 ing curvature satisfies the semiclassical equation T˙+ = F + R˙ /F, (5) p R 1 Rg =8π Tˆ , (1) where the dot denotes a τ derivative and µν − 2 µν h µν i where R is the Ricci tensor correspondingto the met- R˙ + F + R˙ 2 µν ˙ (6) ˆ U+ = − , ric gµν and Tµν is the expectation value of the stress- pF energy tensor.h i where F = 1 C/RD−2.

Load more