13.3 Black Holes: Gravity's Ultimate Victory

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

13.3 Black Holes: Gravity's Ultimate Victory 13.3 Black Holes: Gravity's Ultimate Victory · Our Goals for Learning · What is a black hole? · What would it be like to visit a black hole? · Do black holes really exist? What is a black hole? A black hole is an object whose gravity is so powerful that not even light can escape it. Question: Escape Velocity The surface gravity force of a planet of mass M and radius R on a rocket of mass m is F = G × M × m ÷ R2 To escape an object's gravity, a rocket must overcome that force, which the rocket does by reaching escape velocity. If you increase the force, you increase the rocket's required escape velocity. So¼ what happens to the escape velocity from an object if you shrink the object? What happens to the escape velocity from an object if you shrink the object? 1. Escape velocity decreases, because radius decreases 2. Escape velocity doesn't change, since the mass is the same 3. Escape velocity increases, because radius decreases What happens to the escape velocity from an object if you shrink the object? 1. Escape velocity decreases, because radius decreases 2. Escape velocity doesn't change, since the mass is the same 3. Escape velocity increases, because radius decreases Escape Velocity Final Kinetic Initial Gravitational = Energy Potential Energy (escape velocity)2 G × (planet mass) = 2 (planet radius) Light would not be able to escape Earth's surface if you could shrink the Earth to a radius < 1 cm The ªsurfaceº of a black hole is the radius at which the escape velocity equals the speed of light. The ªsurfaceº of a black hole is the radius at which the escape velocity equals the speed of light. This spherical surface is known as the event horizon. The ªsurfaceº of a black hole is the radius at which the escape velocity equals the speed of light. This spherical surface is known as the event horizon. The radius of the event horizon is known as the Schwarzschild radius. A black hole's mass strongly warps space and time in vicinity of event horizon. Any mass (not just the mass in a black hole) does to three- dimensional space what a weight does to a two-dimensional rubber surface. No Escape Nothing can escape from within the event horizon because nothing can go faster than light. No escape means there is no more contact with something that falls in. Whatever fell in increases the black hole mass, and can change the spin or charge of the black hole, but otherwise loses its identity (according to General Relativity, but maybe not according to Quantum Mechanics ¼ Hawking's theory of black hole evaporation). Neutron Star Limit • Quantum mechanics says that neutrons in the same place cannot be in the same state · Neutron degeneracy pressure can no longer support a neutron star against gravity if its mass exceeds about 3 Msun (neutrons with the same state would have to move faster than light to avoid being in the same place at the same time) · Some massive star supernovae can make a black hole if enough mass falls onto core Beyond the neutron star limit, no known force can resist the crush of gravity. As far as we know, gravity crushes all the matter into a single point known as a singularity. Even if we are right, the singularity is inside the event horizon, so it will never be seen by the universe outside. Neutron star 3 MSun Black Hole The event horizon of a 3 MSun black hole is also about as big as a small city Question Is it easy or difficult to fall into a black hole? A. Easy B. Difficult Hint: A black hole with the same mass as the Sun wouldn't be much bigger than a university campus How does the radius of the event horizon change when you add mass to a black hole? Hint: the escape velocity from any black hole is the speed of light (escape velocity)2 G × (object's mass) = 2 (object's radius) How does the radius of the event horizon change when you add mass to a black hole? 1. Decreases 2. Stays the same 3. Increases How does the radius of the event horizon change when you add mass to a black hole? 1. Decreases 2. Stays the same 3. Increases What would it be like to visit a black hole? If the Sun shrank into a black hole, its gravity would be different only near the event horizon. If the Sun shrank into a black hole, its gravity would be different only near the event horizon. The Earth©s orbit would not change if the Sun suddenly became a black hole. If the Sun shrank into a black hole, its gravity would be different only near the event horizon. The Earth©s orbit would not change if the Sun suddenly became a black hole. Black holes don't suck! Light waves take extra energy to climb out of the deep dip in spacetime near a black hole, leading to a gravitational redshift Time passes more slowly near the event horizon Tidal forces near the event horizon of a 3 MSun black hole would be lethal to humans Tidal forces would be gentler near a supermassive black hole because its radius is much bigger Do black holes really exist? Black Hole Verification • Need to measure mass Use orbital properties of companion Measure velocity and distance of orbiting gas • It's a black hole if it's not a star and its mass exceeds the neutron star limit (~3 MSun) Some X-ray binaries contain compact objects of mass exceeding 5 MSun which must be black holes One famous X-ray binary with a likely black hole is in the constellation Cygnus 13.4 The Mystery of Gamma-Ray Bursts · Our Goals for Learning · What causes gamma ray bursts? Gamma ray bursts may signal the births of new black holes Some gamma ray bursts come from extreme supernovae (hypernovae?) in very distant galaxies; others from collisions of 2 neutron stars or a neutron star and a black hole in moderately distant galaxies. What have we learned? What is a black hole? · A black hole is a place where gravity has crushed matter into oblivion, creating a true hole in the universe from which nothing can ever escape, not even light. What have we learned? What would it be like to visit a black hole? · You could orbit a black hole just like any other object of the same mass. However, you'd see strange effects for an object falling toward the black hole: ± Time would seem to run slowly for the object ± Its light would be increasingly redshifted as it approached the black hole. ± The object would never quite reach the event horizon, but it would soon disappear from view as its light became so redshifted that no instrument could detect it. What have we learned? · Do black holes really exist? · No known force can stop the collapse of a stellar corpse with a mass above the neutron star limit of about 3 solar masses, and theoretical studies of supernovae suggest that such objects should sometimes form. Observational evidence supports this idea. What have we learned? · What causes gamma ray bursts? · Gamma-ray bursts occur in distant galaxies and are the most powerful bursts of energy we observe anywhere in the universe. No one knows their precise cause, although at least some appear to come from unusually powerful supernovae. Activity 25, Special Relativity Part I, page 83 Part IV, page 85-86 MOVING CLOCKS RUN SLOW MOVING CLOCKS RUN SLOW · If a clock is moving relative to you, it runs slower than your watch, which is not moving relative to you. MOVING CLOCKS RUN SLOW · If a clock is moving relative to you, it runs slower than your watch, which is not moving relative to you. · From the point of view of someone not moving relative to the clock, you and your watch are moving. So what that person sees is that your watch is running slow relative to their clock. A CLOCK MOVING RELATIVE TO YOU RUNS SLOWER THAN A CLOCK NOT MOVING RELATIVE TO YOU · If a clock is moving relative to you, it runs slower than your watch, which is not moving relative to you. · TIME IS RELATIVE · From the point of view of someone not moving relative to the clock, you and your watch are moving. So what that person sees is that your watch is running slow relative to their clock..
Recommended publications
  • Astro 210 Lecture 37 April 23, 2018 Announcements
    Astro 210 Lecture 37 April 23, 2018 Announcements: • HW 11: The Final Frontier posted, due 5:00pm Friday • Grades: we are catching up! keep checking Moodle 1 Last Time: Searching for Black Holes Black holes themselves are invisible∗ can can detect them via their strong gravitational effects on their close surroundings example: binary stars X-rays emitted from unseen massive companion ∗this ignores Hawking radiation–see below 2 Our Own Galactic Center central ∼ 30 pc of Galaxy: can’t see optically (Q: why?), but can in other wavelengths: extended (non-point) radio emission (Sagittarius A) from high-energy electrons radio source at center: Sgr A∗ size 2.4 AU(!), variable emission in radio, X-ray www: X-ray Sgr A∗ in infrared wavelengths: can see stars near Sgr A∗ and they move! www: Sgr A∗ movie elliptical paths! closest: period P = 15.2 yr semi-major axis: a = 4.64 × 10−3 pc 3 6 → enclosed mass (3.7 ± 1.5) × 10 M⊙ Q: and so? the center of our Galaxy contains a black hole! Sgr A∗ Schwarzschild radius 7 −7 rSch = 1.1 × 10 km=0.74 AU = 3.6 × 10 pc (1) → not resolved (yet) but: Event Horizon Telescope has data and right now is processing possible first images! Galactic black hole raises many questions: • how did it get there? • Sgr A∗ low luminosity, “quiet” compared to more “active” galactic nuclei www: AGN: M87 why? open question.... • in last few months: discovery of high-energy “bubbles” 4 above & below Galactic center www: gamma-ray images → remains of the most recent Sgr A∗ belch? Galaxies and Black Holes The Milky Way is not the only
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:Gr-Qc/0612030 V1 5 Dec 2006
    December 6, 2006 1:49 WSPC - Proceedings Trim Size: 9.75in x 6.5in main 1 STABLE DARK ENERGY STARS: AN ALTERNATIVE TO BLACK HOLES? FRANCISCO S. N. LOBO Centro de Astronomia e Astrof´ısica da Universidade de Lisboa, Campo Grande, Ed. C8 1749-016 Lisboa, Portugal flobo@cosmo.fis.fc.ul.pt In this work, a generalization of the Mazur-Mottola gravastar model is explored, by considering a matching of an interior solution governed by the dark energy equation of state, ω ≡ p/ρ < −1/3, to an exterior Schwarzschild vacuum solution at a junction interface, situated near to where the event horizon is expected to form. The motivation for implementing this generalization arises from the fact that recent observations have confirmed an accelerated cosmic expansion, for which dark energy is a possible candidate. Keywords: Gravastars; dark energy. Although evidence for the existence of black holes is very convincing, a certain amount of scepticism regarding the physical reality of singularities and event hori- zons is still encountered. In part, due to this scepticism, an alternative picture for the final state of gravitational collapse has emerged, where an interior compact ob- ject is matched to an exterior Schwarzschild vacuum spacetime, at or near where the event horizon is expected to form. Therefore, these alternative models do not possess a singularity at the origin and have no event horizon, as its rigid surface is arXiv:gr-qc/0612030 v1 5 Dec 2006 located at a radius slightly greater than the Schwarzschild radius. In particular, the gravastar (gravitational vacuum star) picture, proposed by Mazur and Mottola,1 has an effective phase transition at/near where the event horizon is expected to form, and the interior is replaced by a de Sitter condensate.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Astronomy from Darkness to Blazing Glory
    Introduction to Astronomy From Darkness to Blazing Glory Published by JAS Educational Publications Copyright Pending 2010 JAS Educational Publications All rights reserved. Including the right of reproduction in whole or in part in any form. Second Edition Author: Jeffrey Wright Scott Photographs and Diagrams: Credit NASA, Jet Propulsion Laboratory, USGS, NOAA, Aames Research Center JAS Educational Publications 2601 Oakdale Road, H2 P.O. Box 197 Modesto California 95355 1-888-586-6252 Website: http://.Introastro.com Printing by Minuteman Press, Berkley, California ISBN 978-0-9827200-0-4 1 Introduction to Astronomy From Darkness to Blazing Glory The moon Titan is in the forefront with the moon Tethys behind it. These are two of many of Saturn’s moons Credit: Cassini Imaging Team, ISS, JPL, ESA, NASA 2 Introduction to Astronomy Contents in Brief Chapter 1: Astronomy Basics: Pages 1 – 6 Workbook Pages 1 - 2 Chapter 2: Time: Pages 7 - 10 Workbook Pages 3 - 4 Chapter 3: Solar System Overview: Pages 11 - 14 Workbook Pages 5 - 8 Chapter 4: Our Sun: Pages 15 - 20 Workbook Pages 9 - 16 Chapter 5: The Terrestrial Planets: Page 21 - 39 Workbook Pages 17 - 36 Mercury: Pages 22 - 23 Venus: Pages 24 - 25 Earth: Pages 25 - 34 Mars: Pages 34 - 39 Chapter 6: Outer, Dwarf and Exoplanets Pages: 41-54 Workbook Pages 37 - 48 Jupiter: Pages 41 - 42 Saturn: Pages 42 - 44 Uranus: Pages 44 - 45 Neptune: Pages 45 - 46 Dwarf Planets, Plutoids and Exoplanets: Pages 47 -54 3 Chapter 7: The Moons: Pages: 55 - 66 Workbook Pages 49 - 56 Chapter 8: Rocks and Ice:
    [Show full text]
  • 1. Two Objects Attract Each Other Gravitationally. If the Distance Between Their Centers Is Cut in Half, the Gravitational Force A) Is Cut to One Fourth
    MULTIPLE CHOICE REVIEW – GRAVITATION (Dynamics Part 3) 1. Two objects attract each other gravitationally. If the distance between their centers is cut in half, the gravitational force A) is cut to one fourth. B) is cut in half. C) doubles. D) quadruples 2. Two objects, with masses m1 and m2, are originally a distance r apart. The magnitude of the gravitational force between them is F. The masses are changed to 2m1 and 2m2, and the distance is changed to 4r. What is the magnitude of the new gravitational force? A) F/16 B) F/4 C) 16F D) 4F 3. As a rocket moves away from the Earth's surface, the rocket's weight A) increases. B) decreases. C) remains the same. D) depends on how fast it is moving. 4. A hypothetical planet has a mass of half that of the Earth and a radius of twice that of the Earth. What is the acceleration due to gravity on the planet in terms of g, the acceleration due to gravity at the Earth? A) g B) g/2 C) g/4 D) g/8 5. Two planets have the same surface gravity, but planet B has twice the mass of planet A. If planet A has radius r, what is the radius of planet B? A) 0.707r B) r C) 1.41r D) 4r 6. A planet is discovered to orbit around a star in the galaxy Andromeda, with the same orbital diameter as the Earth around our Sun. If that star has 4 times the mass of our Sun, what will the period of revolution of that new planet be, compared to the Earth's orbital period? A) one-fourth as much B) one-half as much C) twice as much D) four times as much 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Neutron Stars & Black Holes
    Introduction ? Recall that White Dwarfs are the second most common type of star. ? They are the remains of medium-sized stars - hydrogen fused to helium Neutron Stars - failed to ignite carbon - drove away their envelopes to from planetary nebulae & - collapsed and cooled to form White Dwarfs ? The more massive a White Dwarf, the smaller its radius Black Holes ? Stars more massive than the Chandrasekhar limit of 1.4 solar masses cannot be White Dwarfs Formation of Neutron Stars As the core of a massive star (residual mass greater than 1.4 ?Supernova 1987A solar masses) begins to collapse: (arrow) in the Large - density quickly reaches that of a white dwarf Magellanic Cloud was - but weight is too great to be supported by degenerate the first supernova electrons visible to the naked eye - collapse of core continues; atomic nuclei are broken apart since 1604. by gamma rays - Almost instantaneously, the increasing density forces freed electrons to absorb electrons to form neutrons - the star blasts away in a supernova explosion leaving behind a neutron star. Properties of Neutron Stars Crab Nebula ? Neutrons stars predicted to have a radius of about 10 km ? In CE 1054, Chinese and a density of 1014 g/cm3 . astronomers saw a ? This density is about the same as the nucleus supernova ? A sugar-cube-sized lump of this material would weigh 100 ? Pulsar is at center (arrow) million tons ? It is very energetic; pulses ? The mass of a neutron star cannot be more than 2-3 solar are detectable at visual masses wavelengths ? Neutron stars are predicted to rotate very fast, to be very ? Inset image taken by hot, and have a strong magnetic field.
    [Show full text]
  • Tidal Tomography to Probe the Moon's Mantle Structure Using
    Tidal Tomography to Probe the Moon’s Mantle Structure Using Lunar Surface Gravimetry Kieran A. Carroll1, Harriet Lau2, 1: Gedex Systems Inc., [email protected] 2: Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Harvard University, [email protected] Lunar Tides Gravimetry of the Lunar Interior VEGA Instrument through the Moon's PulSE • Gedex has developed a low cost compact space gravimeter instrument , VEGA (Vector (GLIMPSE) Investigation Gravimeter/Accelerometer) Moon • Currently this is the only available gravimeter that is suitable for use in space Earth GLIMPSE Investigation: • Proposed under NASA’s Lunar Surface Instrument and Technology Payloads • ca. 1972 MIT developed a space gravimeter (LSITP) program. instrument for use on the Moon, for Apollo 17. That instrument is long-ago out of • To fly a VEGA instrument to the Moon on a commercial lunar lander, via NASA’s production and obsolete. Commercial Lunar Payload Services (CLPS) program. VEGA under test in thermal- GLIMPSE Objectives: VEGA Space Gravimeter Information vacuum chamber at Gedex • Prove the principle of measuring time-varying lunar surface gravity to probe the lunar • Measures absolute gravity vector, with no • Just as the Moon and the Sun exert tidal forces on the Earth, the Earth exerts tidal deep interior using the Tidal Tomography technique. bias forces on the Moon. • Determine constraints on parameters defining the Lunar mantle structure using time- • Accuracy on the Moon: • Tidal stresses in the Moon are proportional to the gravity gradient tensor field at the varying gravity measurements at a location on the surface of the Moon, over the • Magnitude: Effective noise of 8 micro- Moon’s centre, multiplies by the distance from the Moon’s centre.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2010.05354V1 [Gr-Qc] 11 Oct 2020
    Black hole or Gravastar? The GW190521 case I. Antoniou1, ∗ 1Department of Physics, University of Ioannina, GR-45110, Ioannina, Greece (Dated: August 31, 2021) The existence of cosmological compact objects with very strong gravity is a prediction of General Relativity and an exact solution of the Einstein equations. These objects are called black holes and recently we had the first observations of them. However, the theory of black hole formation has some disadvantages. In order to avoid these, some scientists suggest the existence of gravastars (gravitation vacuum stars), an alternative stellar model which seems to solve the problems of the black hole theory. In this work we compare black holes and gravastars using a wide range of the literature and we emphasize the properties of gravastars, which are consistent with the current cosmological observations. Also, we propose gravastars as the solution of the ”pair-instability” effect and a possible explanation for the observed masses of the compact objects, before the collapse, from the gravitational signal GW190521, since in the formation of a gravastar there aren’t mass restrictions. PACS numbers: 98.62.Ai, 04.20.Cv, 04.30.-w I. INTRODUCTION black holes, or some other compact object with very strong gravity. Many scientists dispute the One of the most attractive concepts in Gen- existence of black holes because if we take into ac- eral Relativity is the existence and the properties count quantum effects, the gravitational collapse of black holes, a region of spacetime where grav- of objects comes to a halt and furthermore no ity is so strong that nothing, no particles or even event horizon forms [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Effective Dynamics of the Schwarzschild Black Hole Interior
    Effective dynamics of the Schwarzschild black hole interior with inverse triad corrections Hugo A. Morales-Técotl,1, 2, ∗ Saeed Rastgoo,3, 1, 4, y and Juan C. Ruelas1, z 1Departamento de Física, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana - Iztapalapa San Rafael Atlixco 186, Ciudad de Mexico 09340, Mexico 2Departamento de Física, Escuela Superior de Física y Matemáticas del Instituto Politécnico Nacional Unidad Adolfo López Mateos, Edificio 9, 07738 Ciudad de México, Mexico 3School of Sciences and Engineering Monterrey Institute of Technology (ITESM), Campus León Av. Eugenio Garza Sada, León, Guanajuato 37190, Mexico 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, York University 4700 Keele Street, Toronto, Ontario M3J 1P3, Canada (Dated: January 22, 2021) We reconsider the study of the interior of the Schwarzschild black hole now in- cluding inverse triad quantum corrections within loop quantization. We derive these corrections and show that they are are related to two parameters δb; δc associated to the minimum length in the radial and angular directions, that enter Thiemann’s trick for quantum inverse triads. Introduction of such corrections may lead to non- invariance of physical results under rescaling of the fiducial volume needed to compute the dynamics, due to noncompact topology of the model. So, we put forward two prescriptions to resolve this issue. These prescriptions amount to interchange δb; δc in classical computations in Thiemann’s trick. By implementing the inverse triad cor- rections we found, previous results such as singularity resolution and black-to-white hole bounce hold with different values for the minimum radius-at-bounce, and the mass of the white hole. I. INTRODUCTION As one of the most fascinating predictions of general relativity, black holes have been arXiv:1806.05795v3 [gr-qc] 21 Jan 2021 the subject of much analysis and explorations.
    [Show full text]
  • Black-Hole Mass Estimates for a Homogeneous Sample of Bright Flat-Spectrum Radio Quasars
    A&A 560, A28 (2013) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201321424 & c ESO 2013 Astrophysics Black-hole mass estimates for a homogeneous sample of bright flat-spectrum radio quasars G. Castignani1, F. Haardt2;3, A. Lapi4;1, G. De Zotti5;1, A. Celotti1, and L. Danese1 1 SISSA, via Bonomea 265, 34136 Trieste, Italy e-mail: [email protected] 2 DiSAT, Università dell’Insubria, via Valleggio 11, 22100 Como, Italy 3 INFN, Sezione di Milano Bicocca, Piazza Della Scienza 3, 20126 Milano, Italy 4 Dipartimento di Fisica, Università “Tor Vergata”, via della Ricerca Scientifica 1, 00133 Roma, Italy 5 INAF-Osservatorio Astronomico di Padova, Vicolo dell’Osservatorio 5, 35122 Padova, Italy Received 6 March 2013 / Accepted 16 September 2013 ABSTRACT We have selected a complete sample of flat-spectrum radio quasars (FSRQs) from the WMAP 7 yr catalog within the SDSS area, all with measured redshift, and compared the black-hole mass estimates based on fitting a standard accretion disk model to the “blue bump” with those obtained from the commonly used single-epoch virial method. The sample comprises 79 objects with a flux density limit of 1 Jy at 23 GHz, 54 of which (68%) have a clearly detected “blue bump”. Thirty-four of those 54 have, in the literature, black-hole mass estimates obtained with the virial method. The mass estimates obtained from the two methods are well correlated. If the calibration factor of the virial relation is set to f = 4:5, well within the range of recent estimates, the mean logarithmic ratio of the two mass estimates is equal to zero with a dispersion close to the estimated uncertainty of the virial method.
    [Show full text]
  • PHYS 231 Lecture Notes – Week 7
    PHYS 231 Lecture Notes { Week 7 Reading from Maoz (2nd edition): • Sections 4.1{4.5 Again, a lot of the material presented in class this week is well covered in Maoz, and we simply reference the book, with additional comments and derivations as needed. References to slides on the web page are in the format \slidesx.y/nn," where x is week, y is lecture, and nn is slide number. 7.1 High-Mass Stars See Maoz x4.3.1 High-mass stars don't have degeneracy problems that limit their ability to burn heavier elements. As described in the text, they carbon and oxygen into neon, magnesium, silicon, and all the way up to iron. Fusion occurs principally by alpha capture (because of the lower coulomb barrier), bur C-C and other relatively low-mass reactions also occur. The process accelerates greatly as heavier and heavier elements are produced. The core of the star develops a layered structure, with shells of lighter elements surrounding a non-burning and growing nickel-iron core (see slides7.2/15,16). The star now has a new problem. Up to now, this scenario would have led to a new round of fusion in the core and a temporary restoration of stability, but not in this case. Elements in the so-called iron group (with A ≈ 56) have the largest binding energy per nucleon of all elements (see slides7.2/19). Simply put, fusing lighter elements (H, He, C, etc.) will increase the total binding energy, creating more tightly bound elements and releasing energy.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Holes and Type 1A Supernovae Describe a Black Hole and How They Are Created
    Black Holes and type 1a supernovae Describe a Black Hole and how they are created. Explain how type Ia supernovae can be used as standard candles. Black Holes For extremely massive stars, whose core after a supernova is more than three solar masses, gravitational compression in the neutron star continues, producing a black hole. A black hole is a region of space-time with an escape velocity greater than the speed of light, c, which from Einstein’s theory of special relativity is impossible to achieve. This is due to such a strong gravitational field that no particles or electromagnetic radiation can escape from it. 2퐺푀 Then we can obtain the maximum value of R as: 푅 = 푅 = 푠 푐2 This radius RS is called the Schwarzschild radius. The Schwarzschild radius tells us, for a given mass, how small an object must be for it to trap light around it and therefore appear black. This radius effectively forms a boundary that we call the event horizon of the black hole. Within this, the escape velocity is greater than or equal to the speed of light. Hence, all information from inside the event horizon is lost. Since black holes cannot be directly seen, information about them can only be inferred from the effects they have on nearby objects. Supermassive Black Holes Observations have shown that stars and gas orbiting near the centres of galaxies are being accelerated to very high orbital velocities. This can be explained if a large supermassive object with a strong gravitational field in a small region of space is attracting them.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 3 Projects Test Monday Gravity
    Chapter 3 Celestial Sphere Movie Gravity and Motion Projects Test Monday Preview • I moved due-date for Part 1 to 10/21 Ch 1 Ch 2 • I added a descriptive webpage about the Galileo Movie projects. Essay 1: Backyard Astronomy Ch. 3 (just beginning) Northern Hemisphere sky: Big Dipper Little Dipper Cassiopeia Orion Polaris Gravity The Problem of Astronomical Motion • Gravity gives the Universe its structure • Astronomers of antiquity did – It is a universal force that not connect gravity and causes all objects to pull on astronomical motion all other objects • Galileo investigated this everywhere connection with experiments – It holds objects together using projectiles and balls – It is responsible for holding rolling down planks the Earth in its orbit around • He put science on a course to the Sun, the Sun in its orbit determine laws of motion and around the Milky Way, and to develop the scientific the Milky Way in its path method within the Local Group Inertia and Newton’s First Law Inertia • This concept was • Galileo established the idea of inertia incorporated in – A body at rest tends to remain at rest Newton’s First Law – A body in motion tends to remain in motion of Motion: – Through experiments with inclined planes, Galileo demonstrated the idea of inertia and the A body continues in a importance of forces (friction) state of rest or uniform motion in a straight line unless made to change that state by forces acting on it Newton’s First Law Astronomical Motion • As seen earlier, planets • Must there be a force at move along curved work? • Important ideas of (elliptical) paths, or Newton’s First Law – The law implies that if • Yes! an object is not moving orbits.
    [Show full text]