Download (PDF)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Download (PDF) 1| NEES Network Site Activities 1.0 Network Summary Purposed to improve the understanding of earthquakes and tsunamis and their effects on our nation’s infrastructure, NSF created The George E. Brown, Jr. Network for Earthquake Engineering Simulation (NEES). NEES is a shared national network of 14 experimental facilities, collaborative tools, and earthquake simulation software. Together, these resources provide the means for collaboration and discovery in the form of more advanced research based on experimentation and computational simulations of the ways buildings, bridges, utility systems, coastal regions, and geomaterials perform during seismic events. At the core of NEES are fourteen geographically-distributed research sites, each offering unparalleled experimental capabilities. The laboratory types include: Shake Table Facilities University of Minnesota University at Buffalo, SUNY Geotechnical Centrifuge University of California, San Diego Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute University of Nevada Reno University of California, Davis Large-Scale Structural Field Experimentation and Monitoring Cornell University University of California, Los Angeles Lehigh University University of California, Santa Barbara University at Buffalo, SUNY University of Texas, Austin University of California, Berkeley Tsunami Wave Basin University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign Oregon State University Through the results of cutting-edge experimentation across the network, NEES strives to develop and implement effective means of earthquake and tsunami risk mitigation. In addition, NEES looks to educate the community through the development strategic education, training, and outreach events. Though NEES looks to become the prototypical example of dissemination of knowledge to a broad range of audiences, the success of NEES is dependent on the quality and excellence of research done at the site level. Volume 3 of the NEEScomm annual report details the accomplishments and activities during the 2013 fiscal year across the network. This volume includes highlights of the unique capabilities of each of the fourteen facilities across the network, network financial and metric summaries for fiscal year 2012 and 2013, and site activity narratives. Additionally, highlights from selected projects are included to emphasize the impact of the research occurring across the network. 1 Volume 2: NEES Network Site Activities 1.1 Facility Highlights Introduction This section contains highlights of the capabilities present across the network. The descriptions of the capabilities are separated in the five major types of facilities: Shake Table Facilities, Large Scale Laboratories, Geotechnical Centrifuges, Mobile/Field Laboratories, and the Tsunami Research Facility. All fourteen of the NEES equipment sites are represented and demonstrates the state-of-the-art capabilities of the network. 1.1.0 Shake Table Facilities – Earthquakes on Demand! NEES@Buffalo – Shake Table and Large Scale Structural Testing Facility Hosted within the University at Buffalo’s Structural Engineering and Earthquake Simulation Laboratory (SEESL), the NEES@Buffalo facility features twin reconfigurable, 0-100Hz, six degree-of-freedom shake tables with a capacity of 50 metric-tons each (Figure 1). The tables are equipped with extension frames providing a 7 meter x 7 meter deployable surface area. The versatility of the NEES@Buffalo facility allows for the twin shake tables to be rapidly repositioned along a 38 meter-long trench (accommodating a maximum specimen length of 36.5 meters). Additionally, when used in conjunction with the 9 meter-high reaction wall, the facility supports Real Time Dynamic Hybrid Testing (RTDHT). This unique one-of-a-kind capability permits researchers to seamlessly integrate analytical models with large-scale dynamic tests, permitting a more complete investigation of full-scale structural systems than was previously possible. Figure 1: Shake Table 1 at NEES@Buffalo during the “NEESR-GC: Seismic Risk Mitigation for Ports” project. (Rix et al., CMS-0530478) 2 NEES@UNR – Four (Anywhere) On The Floor The NEES@UNR facility is highlighted with four large shake-tables; three bi-axial shake tables and one six-degree-of-freedom table. The tables are 4.3 meters x 4.5 meters and operate between 0 and 50 Hz with a maximum payload capacity of 45 metric-tons. The facility is capable of testing conventional structural and non-structural systems by using the biaxial tables in large-table-mode, and operating them as a single unit. Exclusive to the NEES@UNR facility, the tables also have the flexibility to be positioned anywhere in the laboratory, which enables testing of long, spatially distributed, structural and geotechnical systems. Researchers have utilized these capabilities for the dynamic testing of a 110- ft long, four span concrete bridge (Figure 2). Figure 2: Shake Table 1, 2, and 3 at the NEES@UNR facility during the “NEESR-SG; Seismic Performance of Bridge Systems with Conventional and Innovative Materials” project. (Saiidi et al., CMMI #0420347) 3 Volume 2: NEES Network Site Activities NEES@UCSD – The Sky Is The Limit Offering the largest shake table in the U.S., the NEES@UCSD boasts the largest outdoor shake table in the world. LHPOST (the Large, High-Performance Outdoor Shake Table) has been designed with performance characteristics that permit the accurate reproduction of strong near-source earthquake ground motions for the seismic testing of systems at full-scale or very large-scale. The table is 7.6 meters x 12.2 meters and operates between 0 and 33 HZ with a maximum payload capacity of 2000 metric tons. Having virtually no vertical limitations, LHPOST has enabled the testing of structures that could not be accommodated inside a conventional laboratory. Seismic testing of full scale wind turbines, multi-story structures, and various other large-scale building systems is now possible due to the capabilities provided by NEES@UCSD. Figure 3: The Large High-Performance Outdoor Shake Table (LHPOST) at NEES@UCSD 4 1.1.1 Large Scale Structural Laboratories – Force to be Reckoned With! NEES@Cornell – Lifelines Testing NEES@Cornell, known as the Large-Scale Lifelines Testing Facility (Figure 4), is a unique, world-class resource for research, education, and outreach focused on underground lifeline response to large ground deformation and the seismic performance of highly flexible above-ground structures using advanced materials and construction. The site consists of a large-scale test basin driven by large stroke actuators to simulate large ground deformations as caused by severe earthquakes and a storage/conveyor system for moving and storing soil in a controlled environment. Earthquakes can rupture underground pipelines causing disruption of vital services such as water supplies and oil and natural gas transmission pipelines. The breaching of gas lines can also result in fires. The combined effect of loss of water supply and fires from gas lines can be catastrophic; even life threatening. NEES@Cornell’s experience, versatility, creativity and facilities allow it to support very challenging research projects that address these problems. Figure 4: Lifelines Testing Area at NEES@Cornell 5 Volume 2: NEES Network Site Activities NEES@Lehigh – Real-Time Multi-Directional Hybrid Testing The NEES facility at Lehigh University specializes in real-time multi-directional (RTMD) hybrid seismic testing for earthquake simulation of large-scale structural systems. This technology permits the study of complete structural systems, as opposed to individual components, which provides a great deal more information on the behavior of structures subjected to earthquake forces. Located in the Center for Advanced Technology for Large Structural Systems (ATLSS) (Figure 5), NEES@Lehigh combines real-time multi-directional hybrid seismic testing with real-time analytical simulations, to examine the seismic behavior of large-scale structural components, structural sub assemblages, and super assemblages (systems). This is achieved through the combined use of dynamic actuators, a reaction wall, a strong floor, and high-performance computing. This lab is also designed to support multi-site distributed hybrid testing methods where the substructures involved are at different geographic locations connected by the NEES network. Figure 5: The NEES@Lehigh Strong Wall During the “NEESR-SG: Self-Centering Damage-Free Seismic-Resistant Steel Frame Systems” project. (Sause, CMMI-0420974) 6 NEES@Buffalo – The Large Scale Structural Testing Facility-Enabling Real-Time Dynamic Hybrid Testing The University at Buffalo’s Structural Engineering and Earthquake Simulation Laboratory (SEESL) is equipped with a large reaction wall (175 m2) and floor (340 m2). The strong wall and floor testing area enable a one-of-a-kind two-story nonstructural component simulator (NCS) (Figure 6) and a large uni- axial geotechnical laminar box (5m x 2.75 m x 6 m) (Figure 6). The large testing area and vast capabilities permit the NEES@Buffalo facility to perform extremely diverse and versatile experimentation, including Real-Time Dynamic Hybrid Testing (RTDHT). RTDHT combines shake table and/or dynamic force experiments on substructures with computer simulations of the remainder of the structure. This provides a more complete picture of how earthquakes would affect large structural systems such as buildings and bridges, without the need to physically test the entire structure. Figure 6: The Nonstructural Component Figure 7: The Uni-Axial Geotechnical
Recommended publications
  • Contract Manager
    BID DATE: January 20, 2017 PROJECT LOCATION: McKinney Falls State Park PROJECT 137394a PROJECT DESCRIPTION: HVAC Installation NUMBER: OFFERORS ARE ADVISED THAT, in accordance with the Texas Government Code, state agencies must make good faith effort to utilize Historically Underutilized Businesses (HUBs) in contracts for construction services, professional and consulting services and commodities contracts. If the total base proposal price, and/or alternate proposal items exceed $100,000, the Bidder must complete and submit a HUB Subcontracting Plan (HSP) with their proposal following the policy and utilizing the forms contained within the Bidding and Contract Documents. FAILURE TO COMPLETE AND RETURN THESE FORMS WITH THE PROPOSAL WILL BE CAUSE FOR REJECTION OF THE PROPOSAL. For assistance with the HUB Subcontracting Plan (HSP), please contact the TPWD HUB Program at 512-389-4784 or [email protected]. ADDRE CONTACT NAME ADDRESS 1 SS 2 CITY STATE ZIP CODE PROJECT MANAGER: Julia Gonzalez 4200 Smith School Rd Austin Texas 78744 CONTRACT MANAGER: Mandy Holcomb 4200 Smith School Rd Austin Texas 78744 ARCHITECT/ENGINEER Madison Graham 4200 Smith School Rd Austin Texas 78744 OUTSIDE A/E Ford Powell and 1138 East Commerce San Antonio Texas 78205 CONSTRUCTION MANAGER Don Hudson #3 Scudder Lane Winmberly Texas 78676 INSPECTOR: Earl Spurlock 3630 Park Road 4 West Burnet Texas 78611 SITE MANAGER: Tommy Cude 5808 McKinney Falls Pkwy Austin Texas 78744 REGION James Hess 1174 Hwy 71 East Bastrop Texas 78602 General Contracto r Sub- Contracto r Supplier Plan ADDRE DATE Room SET # COMPANY NAME CONTACT NAME ADDRESS 1 SS 2 CITY STATE ZIP CODE PHONE FAX EMAIL MAILED Mid‐State Plumbing & Mechanical, [email protected] GC 1 Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Risk Management in Construction Projects: a Comparative Study of the Different Procurement Options in Sweden
    2008:15 LICENTIATE T H E SIS Osipova EkaterinaOsipova Risk management in construction projects: Risk management in construction projects: a comparative study of the different procurement options in Sweden a comparative study a of study comparative the different procurement options in Sweden Ekaterina Osipova Luleå University of Technology Department of Civil, Mining and Environmental Engineering Division of Architecture and Infrastructure Construction Management Research Group 2007:00 Universitetstryckeriet, Luleå 2008:15|: 102-1757|: -c -- 08 ⁄15 -- Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd. Voltaire Preface This thesis is a result of my PhD studies during 2006-2008 in the Construction Management Research Group at the Division for Architecture and Infrastructure at Luleå University of Technology. The financial support of the Development Fund of the Swedish Construction Industry (SBUF) is gratefully acknowledged. I would like to thank our industrial partner, NCC Sweden, for its engagement in the project. Many people have contributed to this work. First of all, I would like to express my gratitude to my scientific advisors Professor Jan Borgbrant and Adjunct Professor Lennart Apleberger. Jan, thank you for your continuous belief in me from our first meeting in Lund in October 2005, for the opportunity to join your research group and for all guidance and support you gave me during these years. Lennart, thank you for your commitment to the project, your valuable advice and the positive attitude you had every time we met. I would also like to thank Professor Brian Atkin, a programme director of the research school Competitive Building. Brian, I appreciate very much the knowledge you shared with me, the time you spent on proofreading my papers and our work together.
    [Show full text]
  • Careers in Commercial Real Estate Management
    Your Guide to Careers in Commercial Real Estate Management BOMA Welcome to the exciting and rewarding world of commercial real estate management. This is an introduction to an industry that has so much to offer to so many different people, and will reward critical thinking, teamwork and interpersonal relationships. TABLE OF CONTENTS Careers in Commercial Real Estate Management What is Commercial Real Estate Management? page3 Positions in Commercial Real Estate Management page4 Employers in Commercial Real Estate Management page5 Professional Credentials and Certifications page6 Compensation and Salary Information page7 About Houston BOMA Designations, Seminars, and Leadership Programs page8 Career Center, Legislative Advocacy, and Community page9 The Houston BOMA Foundation and Our Mission page10 So what is commercial real estate management exactly? Commercial real estate management incorporates both asset management (without tenants) and real property management (active tenants present). They both require overlapping skill sets and abilities to be managed successfully. While there are many different positions within the commercial real estate management industry (commonly referred to as property management) the property manager is the most common and sought-after role. The property manager position supports and assists in the management of commercial real estate in accordance with a management agreement. The property manager is involved in all aspects of day-to-day operations of the property, including accounting, tenant relations, maintenance and repair, security, janitorial services, landscaping, etc. The property manager handles tenant complaints and service requests, and must be familiar with the terms of tenant leases. The property manager assists in the preparation of the annual budget, reporting and financial performance of the property.
    [Show full text]
  • Structural Engineering Perspective on Historic Building
    Interaction between Theory and Practice in Civil Engineering and Construction Edited by Komurlu, R., Gurgun, A. P., Singh, A., and Yazdani, S. Copyright © 2016 ISEC Press ISBN: 978-0-9960437-2-4 STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING PERSPECTIVE ON HISTORIC BUILDING RESTORATION BURCU BALABAN OKTEN1, MEHMET SELIM OKTEN2, CEM HAYDAROGLU3, and GIANMARIO BENZONI4 1 Faculty of Architecture, Fatih Sultan Mehmet Waqf University, Istanbul, Turkey 2Faculty of Architecture, Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul, Turkey 3Arup, Istanbul, Turkey 4Dept of Structural Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, The restoration of historic buildings requires a comprehensive approach through a collaborative effort, as well as multi-disciplinary professionals. According to the general conservative guidelines of the Venice Charter of 1964 and the ICOMOS/ISCARSAH Recommendations for the Analysis and Restoration of Structures of Architectural Heritage of 2003, structural engineers are responsible for repair and strengthening of these structures on the basis of principles of authenticity, reliability, compatibility, durability, reversibility, and monitorability. In restoration projects, engineers often face significant issues due to the intrinsic challenges of the projects themselves, as well as the complex level of interaction with other professionals involved. The main goal of this research project is the identification and evaluation of the most significant challenges encountered by structural engineers in restoration applications in Turkey. Data were obtained from semi-structured interviews with six professionals involved in restoration projects in Turkey. The sample group was chosen based on specific competences and involvement in different phases of restoration projects in order to gain different professional perspectives. The results revealed several issues from the early stages of the projects, such as a lack of records about previous interventions, a lack of standards and guidelines with respect to historic structures.
    [Show full text]
  • The Development of Robust Details for Sound Insulation in New Build Attached Dwellings
    The development of robust details for sound insulation in new build attached dwellings Received: 30th September, 2005 Sean Smith BSc, PhD, MIOA is RC UK Research Fellow and Principal Research Fellow at the Building Performance Centre, School of the Built Environment, Napier University, External Technical Advisor to Robust Details Ltd and joint project manager of the RSD project. He is also Senior Acoustic Consultant with the Robin Mackenzie Partnership. Dave Baker MRICS, MCIOB, MBEng is CEO of Robust Details Ltd and former Technical Director of the RSD project and House Builders Federation. Richard Mackenzie BSc, MIOA, MInstSCE is Lead Acoustic Consultant with the Robin Mackenzie Partnership and joint project manager of the RSD project. John B. Wood BSc, DA is Lecturer in Architectural Technology at the School of the Built Environment, Napier University and designer of the RSD project submission. Philip Dunbavin MSc, FIOA, MSEE, MIOSH, MInstSCE is Managing Director and Principal Acoustic Consultant with the PDA Group and Chairman of the RD Inspectors. David Panter BSc, MIQA is Operations Manager with Robust Details Ltd. Abstract This paper outlines the background, process and system approach towards the development of robust details (RD) for sound insulation for new build dwellings in England and Wales. Part 1 outlines the initial Robust Standard Details project and its framework, Part 2 describes the structure and operation of the RD scheme for Building Regulation E1 and Part 3 provides feedback on the first operating year of the scheme. In addition, comparisons are made between previous performance levels and constructions used for Part E (1992) relative to the RD approach using recent data feedback from random site inspections and testing.
    [Show full text]
  • Contracts Manager in Construction Industry
    Contracts Manager In Construction Industry Depreciative Batholomew pop some tints and whigging his complaints so hoarsely! Cold-bloodedly hylozoistic, Sax shank shrink and resins lifeguard. Allyn often samba whereinto when stellate Orton resembled saltato and saltate her poppa. Those requests and contracts manager Tertiary qualified in Civil Engineering. There are certain skills that many contracts managers have in order to accomplish their responsibilities. Business lawyers help easily for construction lawyer is legible and perform periodic budget goals are: a performance management cv around full of cv template as an ideal situation. The VRM classifies contracts into one red four categories based on their blatant and risk to close business. An industry for construction contracts manager in industry can begin as directors, procedures within my abilities needed processes before it cannot begin until something. Good project manager industry schemes through framework contracts manager in industry! You should be handed off for you should be easy it? Must be able to manage more than one construction contracts simultaneously. Why they come across one on our Budding Brunels courses to sift out chat about professions in construction? Good communication skills and good working attitude towards clients and architects. Planning critical role that some states based legal ramifications inherent in a contracts faster than others involved with important way. Liaising with internal experience external stakeholders to ensure effective application of ransom and maximisation of value in brief to rest service areas. Responsibilities: Puts together plans and estimates, including budgets and timescales. To growing to budgets, we anniversary a signed contract you lock exploit the numbers.
    [Show full text]
  • Curriculum Vitae
    Walker House, George Street, Aylesbury, Bucks, HP20 2HU, United Kingdom. Tel: (01296) 399311 Fax (01296) 395669 Email: [email protected] Web: www.resprotint.co.uk Curriculum Vitae DR BARBARA CHISHOLM AIEMA CEng FICE FCIWEM Project Manager, Resource Protection International Dr. Chisholm has over 25 years experience in civil, fire, environmental, water and wastewater projects as both a designer and contractor in a variety of roles working in or leading multi-disciplinary teams. CAREER SUMMARY October 2008 – Present Project Manger, RPI Barbara joined Resource Protection International to take on an overall project management role with particular involvement in the specification, testing and assurance of water based systems. Typical experience includes:- - Structural Design Engineering - Site Manager - Project Manager - Fire Risk Assessment - Fire Hazard Management Philosophy Development - Detail design and specification of fire systems September 2006 – October 2008 Principal Civil Engineer ,MWH – High Wycombe. Principal Civil Engineer within the Wastewater Team for the detail design of a number of Wastewater schemes involving new storm water separation & storage, new final tanks, odour treatment plant, sludge treatment (centrifuges) and pumping stations. She was also actively involved with HAZOP and ALM studies for these works and the development of the programme and commissioning plans. As the Technical Manager for a study of a potential sludge incinerator she submitted the final report to the Client in March 2008; this study involved environmental and planning issues, outline design and an estimate for PR09 submission. She worked on the detailed design of a complete new Wastewater Treatment Plant (including a sludge recycling centre – centrifuges & dryer) where she developed plant layouts, levels and pipeline routes.
    [Show full text]
  • Zoning Ordinance ™ Table of Contents
    ZZOONNIINNGG OORRDDIINNAANNCCEE CCiittyy ooff TToommbbaallll,, TTeexxaass Ordinance No. 2008-01 Zoning Ordinance Table of Contents TTaabbllee ooff CCoonntteennttss I. ENACTING PROVISIONS.....................................................................................................................4 Section 1: ENACTING CLAUSE...........................................................................................................4 Section 2: TITLE & PURPOSE...............................................................................................................4 Section 3: ZONING DISTRICT MAP ..................................................................................................4 Section 4: ZONING DISTRICT BOUNDARIES ...............................................................................5 Section 5: COMPLIANCE REQUIRED & APPLICATIONS OF REGULATIONS....................6 Section 6: ZONING UPON ANNEXATION .....................................................................................7 II. ZONING PROCEDURES & ADMINISTRATION ..........................................................................8 Section 7: NONCONFORMING USES & STRUCTURES ..............................................................8 Section 8: PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION......................................................................11 Section 9: BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS (BOA) ..............................................................................13 Section 10: AMENDMENTS TO ZONING ORDINANCE & DISTRICTS, ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES,
    [Show full text]
  • Architectural Design
    Pathway: Architectural Design Get the Facts: Architectural Design is: College and Career: Architectural and Civil Drafters prepare detailed • High skill There are a number of options for education and drawings of architectural and structural features • High wage training beyond high school, depending on your of buildings or drawings and topographical relief • High demand career goals. In Utah, the following colleges offer maps used in civil engineering projects, such as Occupation Outlook: programs in Architectural Design. highways, bridges, and public works. Use knowl- edge of building materials, engineering practices, • BYUI – AAS Architectural Technology and mathematics to complete drawings. • WSU – BS Design Engineering Technology; The Utah statewide annual median wage: Architects plan and design structures, such as BIS Architecture, Engineering & Construction private residences, office buildings, theaters, Technology; AAS Design Engineering Tech AS Architectural/Civil Drafter factories, and other structural property. $47,120 • U of U – BS Architectural Studies; BS Urban Architecture students learn the fundamentals of BS Architect architecture design, technology, history and $71,150 Ecology; BS Multi-Disciplinary Design theory. • UVU – AS, AAS Drafting; CP Architectural Design Technology; CP Civil Design Tech; CP Structural Design Technology Workforce Trends: Sample Career Occupations: • SUU – BS Engineering Technology- Employment of Architects and Architectural • Architectural/Civil Drafter Architecture/Civil Design emphasis; Drafters is projected to GROW 7 percent • Architect BS Engineering Technology-CAD/CAM from 2014 to 2024, about as fast as the average • Urban Planner emphasis; AAS Engineering Technology- for all occupations. • Building Surveyor CAD/CAM Technology; CC Civil Design • Architectural Manager Those with up-to- date technical skills • USU/E – CC Engineering Drafting & Design —including a strong grasp of CAD and BIM— Technology and experience in sustainable design will have an advantage.
    [Show full text]
  • Working Rule Agreement for the Construction Industry
    WORKING RULE AGREEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY (Revised 1st August 2018) 1 Further copies available from Construction Industry Publications Ltd Tel: 0870 078 4400 Email: [email protected] www.cip-books.com Price: £8.00 each + p&p Any Enquiries regarding this Agreement should be made to the appropriate body set out on page (ii) ISBN : 9781852631543 Edition : August 2018 Copyright : © Construction Industry Joint Council 2018 Published by : Construction Industry Joint Council Typeset by : mjt77design CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY JOINT COUNCIL WORKING RULE AGREEMENT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY (Revised 1st August 2018) i Construction Industry Joint Council Adherent Bodies to the Council Employers: National Federation of Builders NFB National Access & Scaffolding Spectrum House, Suite AF29 Confederation NASC Beehive Ring Road 4th Floor, 12 Bridewell Place Gatwick London EC4V 6AP West Sussex RH6 0LG 020 7822 7400 03450 578160 National Association of Shopfitters NAS Painting & Decorating Association PDA NAS House 32 Coton Road 411 Limpsfield Road Nuneaton Warlingham Warwickshire CV11 5TW Surrey CR6 9HA 0247 635 3776 01883 624961 Home Builders Federation HBF Build UK (Contractor Members) HBF House, 1st Floor 6-8 Bonhill Street 27 Broadwall London EC2A 4BY London SE1 9PL 0844 2495351 020 7960 1600 Civil Engineering Contractors Association CECA 1 Birdcage Walk London SW1H 9JJ 020 7340 0450 Trades Unions: Scottish Building Federation SBF Unite the Union The Courtyard, 1st Floor Unite House, 128 Theobolds Road Unit 8, Callendar Boulevard London
    [Show full text]
  • (CMGC)Construction Manager/General Contractor Manual | January 2015
    (CMGC)Construction Manager/General Contractor Manual | January 2015 Colorado Department of Transportation Innovative Contracting Program 4201 East Arkansas Denver, CO 80222 Acknowledgements CMGC Manual Development Committee Benjamin Acimovic, CDOT Resident Engineer, I-70 Mountain Corridor Nabil F. Haddad, CDOT Innovative Contracting Program Manager Tamara Hunter-Maurer, CDOT R1 Project Engineer Joseph Elsen, CDOT R3 Central Program Engineer Mark M. Scholfield, Wilson & Company, Inc., Engineers & Architects Christopher E. Hopkins, Wilson & Company, Inc., Engineers & Architects Manual Contributions and Review Janice K. Ashland, Lockton Companies Randy Jensen, FHWA Colorado Division Sina Khavary, CDOT Engineering Estimates & Market Analysis Matthew McDole, LS Gallegos & Associates Inc. Gary Null, CDOT Standards and Specifications Unit Marko Pala, Stanton Constructability Services, LLC Wendy Schlosberg, Wilson & Company, Inc., Engineers & Architects Tracie Smith, CDOT Risk Management Melinda Urban, FHWA Colorado Division Katherine Williams, CDOT Civil Rights & Business Resource Center Shawn Yu, CDOT Engineering Estimates & Market Analysis Jim Zufall, ATKINS Colorado Department of Transportation Innovative Contracting Program 4201 East Arkansas Denver, CO 80222 Construction Manager/General Contractor (CMGC) Manual January 20, 2015 Table of Contents 1 Chapter 1: CMGC Current Practice ..............................................................................................1 1.1 Preface .........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2019 Salary Survey Salary Survey 2019
    2019 Salary Survey Salary Survey 2019 Structural Engineering (South East) JOB TITLE LOW HIGH AVERAGE Trainee Technician £14,000 £22,000 £20,000 Structural Technician (2D) £24,000 £32,000 £27,500 Structural Technician (3D) £27,000 £38,000 £33,000 Senior Structural Technician (2D) £38,000 £44,000 £40,000 Senior Structural Technician (3D) £43,000 £55,000 £49,000 CAD Manager £56,000 £64,000 £58,000 Graduate Structural Engineer £24,000 £28,000 £26,000 Grad +1-2 Years Exp £27,000 £35,000 £32,000 Grad +2-5 Years Exp £32,000 £45,000 £38,000 Senior Structural Engineer £40,000 £52,000 £46,000 Principal Structural Engineer £44,000 £56,000 £50,000 Associate £56,000 £75,000 £65,000 Associate Director £66,000 £80,000 £70,000 Technical Director £70,000 £90,000 £80,000 Salary Survey 2019 Structural Engineering (Rest of UK) JOB TITLE LOW HIGH AVERAGE Trainee Technician £15,500 £20,000 £18,000 Structural Technician (2D) £22,000 £27,700 £25,000 Structural Technician (3D) £27,000 £38,000 £33,500 Senior Structural Technician (2D) £32,000 £40,000 £36,000 Senior Structural Technician (3D) £36,000 £45,000 £40,000 CAD Manager £38,000 £45,000 £43,000 Graduate Structural Engineer £22,000 £28,000 £25,500 Grad +1-2 Years Exp £27,000 £31,000 £29,500 Grad +2-5 Years Exp £30,000 £40,000 £35,500 Senior Structural Engineer £41,000 £48,000 £45,000 Principal Structural Engineer £47,000 £56,000 £52,000 Associate £58,000 £68,500 £64,000 Associate Director £66,000 £74,000 £69,000 Technical Director £66,000 £74,000 £69,000 Salary Survey 2019 Architecture (South East) JOB TITLE
    [Show full text]