IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 2 Texas Tech University

Image description. Cover Image End of image description.

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

What Is IPEDS?

The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is a system of survey components that collects data from about 6,400 institutions that provide postsecondary education across the United States.

These data are used at the federal and state level for policy analysis and development; at the institutional level for benchmarking and peer analysis; and by students and parents, through the College Navigator (https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/), an online tool to aid in the college search process. Additional information about IPEDS can be found on the website at https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds.

What Is the Purpose of This Report?

The Data Feedback Report is intended to provide institutions a context for examining the data they submitted to IPEDS. The purpose of this report is to provide institutional executives a useful resource and to help improve the quality and comparability of IPEDS data.

What Is in This Report?

The figures in this report provide a selection of indicators for your institution to compare with a group of similar institutions. The figures draw from the data collected during the 2018-19 IPEDS collection cycle and are the most recent data available. The inside cover of this report lists the pre-selected comparison group of institutions and the criteria used for their selection. The Methodological Notes at the end of the report describe additional information about these indicators and the pre-selected comparison group.

Where Can I Do More with IPEDS Data?

Each institution can access previously released Data Feedback Reports from 2005 and customize this 2019 report by using a different comparison group and IPEDS variables of its choosing. To learn how to customize the 2019 report, visit this resource page https://nces.ed.gov/Ipeds/Help/View/2. To download archived reports or customize the current Data Feedback Report, visit the ‘Use the Data’ portal on the IPEDS website https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds and click on Data Feedback Report.

Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX Texas Tech University

COMPARISON GROUP Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting your institution’s statistics. If your institution did not define a custom comparison group for this report by July 13, 2018 NCES selected a comparison group for you. (In this case, the characteristics used to define the comparison group appears below.) The Customize Data Feedback Report functionality on the IPEDS Data Center at this provided link (https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/datacenter/) can be used to reproduce the figures in this report using different peer groups.

The custom comparison group chosen by Texas Tech University includes the following 57 institutions:

Arizona State University-Tempe (Tempe, AZ) University of South Florida-Main Campus (Tampa, FL) Auburn University (Auburn, AL) University of Virginia-Main Campus (Charlottesville, VA) Clemson University (Clemson, SC) University of Washington-Seattle Campus (Seattle, WA) Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) University of Wisconsin-Madison (Madison, WI) Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus (Atlanta, GA) Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Blacksburg, VA) Indiana University-Bloomington (Bloomington, IN) Washington State University (Pullman, WA) Iowa State University (Ames, IA) West Virginia University (Morgantown, WV) Kansas State University (Manhattan, KS) Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College (Baton Rouge, LA) Michigan State University (East Lansing, MI) Mississippi State University (Mississippi State, MS) New Mexico State University-Main Campus (Las Cruces, NM) North Carolina State University at Raleigh (Raleigh, NC) Ohio State University-Main Campus (Columbus, OH) Oklahoma State University-Main Campus (Stillwater, OK) Oregon State University (Corvallis, OR) Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus (University Park, PA) Purdue University-Main Campus (West Lafayette, IN) Rutgers University-New Brunswick (New Brunswick, NJ) Texas A & M University-College Station (College Station, TX) The University of Alabama (Tuscaloosa, AL) The University of Tennessee-Knoxville (Knoxville, TN) The University of Texas at Austin (Austin, TX) University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) University of Arkansas (Fayetteville, AR) University of California-Berkeley (Berkeley, CA) University of California-Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA) University of Colorado Boulder (Boulder, CO) University of Connecticut (Storrs, CT) University of Florida (Gainesville, FL) University of Georgia (Athens, GA) University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (Champaign, IL) University of Iowa (Iowa City, IA) University of Kansas (Lawrence, KS) University of Kentucky (Lexington, KY) University of Louisville (Louisville, KY) University of Maryland-College Park (College Park, MD) University of Massachusetts-Amherst (Amherst, MA) University of Michigan-Ann Arbor (Ann Arbor, MI) University of Minnesota-Twin Cities (Minneapolis, MN) University of Mississippi (University, MS) University of Missouri-Columbia (Columbia, MO) University of Nebraska-Lincoln (Lincoln, NE) University of New Mexico-Main Campus (Albuquerque, NM) University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Chapel Hill, NC) University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus (Norman, OK) University of Oregon (Eugene, OR) University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus (Pittsburgh, PA) University of Rhode Island (Kingston, RI) University of South Carolina-Columbia (Columbia, SC) The figures in this report have been organized and ordered into the following topic areas:

1) Admissions (only for non-open-admissions schools) Fig. 1 and 2 Pg. 3 2) Student Enrollment Fig. 3 and 4 Pg. 3 and 4 3) Awards Fig. 5 Pg. 4 4) Charges and Net Price Fig. 6 and 7 Pg. 4 5) Student Financial Aid Fig. 8 and 9 Pg. 5 6) Military Benefits* [No charts applicable] 7) Retention and Graduation Rates Fig. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 Pg. 5, 6, 7 and 8 8) Finance Fig. 19 and 20 Pg. 9 9) Staff Fig. 21 and 22 Pg. 9 10) Libraries* Fig. 23 and 24 Pg. 10

*These figures only appear in customized Data Feedback Reports (DFR), which are available through Use the Data portal on the IPEDS website. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 2 Texas Tech University

Figure 1. Number of first-time undergraduate students who Figure 2. Percent of first-time undergraduate applicants admitted, applied, were admitted, and enrolled full and part time: and percent of admitted students enrolled full and part Fall 2018 time: Fall 2018

Image description. Image description. HorizontalAdmissions Bar measure chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group. HorizontalAdmissions Bar measure chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group. YX scale titled ScaleNumber label. of students. YX scale titled ScalePercent label. of students. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Applicants. institution 24452. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Admitted. institution 71. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Admitted. Group Median (N=57) 30889. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Enrolled full Group time. Median (N=57) 65. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 17280. Median (N=57) 15970. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 35. Median (N=57) 31. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Enrolled institution full time. 6083. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Enrolled institution part time.1. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison Enrolled part Group time. Median (N=57) 5030. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=57) 0.01. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 88. MedianAdmissions (N=57) 31. measure line, Shape Label: Admissions measure Shape InstitutionLegend, Shape Label: Your institution line,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegend, Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57) InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution End of image description. ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57)

24,452 Applicants 71 30,889 Admitted 65

17,280 Admitted 15,970 35 Enrolled full time 31 6,083 Enrolled full time 5,030

1 88 Enrolled part time Enrolled part time 0 31

0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Number of students Percent of students Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=57) Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=57) NOTE: Admissions data are presented only for institutions that do not have an open NOTE: Admissions data are presented only for institutions that do not have an open admission policy, and apply to first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate admission policy, and apply to first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students only. For details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in students only. For details, see the Methodological Notes. See 'Use of Median Values for the comparison group. Comparison Group' for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, in the comparison group. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2018-19, Admissions SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, component. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2018-19, Admissions component.

Figure 3. Percent of all students enrolled, by race/ethnicity, and percent of students who are women: Fall 2018

Image description. XBar scale chart titled with Scale 10 groups label. with 2 items per group. GroupY scale 1, titled American Percent. Indian or Alaska Native. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median (N=57) 0.01. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Asian. institution 3. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Black or African Group American. Median (N=57) 6. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 6. Median (N=57) 5. ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Hispanic/ institution Latino. 27. GroupItem 2, 5, Comparison Native Hawaiian Group or Median other Pacific(N=57) Islander. 7. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median (N=57) 0.01. ItemGroup 1, 6,Your White. institution 54. GroupItem 2, 7, Comparison Two or more Group races. Median (N=57) 62. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 3. Median (N=57) 3. ItemGroup 1, 8,Your Race/ethnicity institution 1. unknown. GroupItem 2, 9, Comparison Nonresident Group alien. Median (N=57) 2. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 6. Median (N=57) 10. ItemGroup 1, 10,Your 100Women. institution 48. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=57) 52. Race/ethnicityShape or gender line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57) 90

70 62 60 54 52 48 50 Percent 40 27 30

20 10 6 6 7 6 10 3 5 3 3 0 0 0 0 1 2 0 American Indian or Asian Black or African Hispanic/ Native Hawaiian or White Two or Race/ethnicity Nonresident alien Women Alaska Native American Latino other Pacific Islander more races unknown

Race/ethnicity or gender

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=57) NOTE: For more information about disaggregation of data by race and ethnicity, see the Methodological Notes. Median values for the comparison group will not add to 100%. See 'Use of Median Values for Comparison Group' for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2019, Fall Enrollment component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 3 Texas Tech University

Figure 4. Unduplicated 12-month headcount of all students and of Figure 5. Number of degrees awarded, by level: 2017-18 undergraduate students (2017-18), total FTE enrollment (2017-18), and full- and part-time fall enrollment (Fall 2018)

Image description. Image description. HorizontalEnrollment Bar measure chart with 5 groups with 2 items per group. HorizontalDegree level Bar chart with 6 groups with 2 items per group. YX scale titled ScaleNumber label. of students. YX scale titled ScaleNumber label. of degrees. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Unduplicated institution 39987.headcount - total. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Doctor's institution Research/ 349. Scholarship. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Unduplicated Group headcount Median -(N=57) undergraduates. 36115. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Doctor's Professional Group Median Practice. (N=57) 394. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 32641. Median (N=57) 27615. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 155. Median (N=57) 302. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Total institution FTE enrollment. 34090. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Doctor's institution Other. 0.01. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison Full-time fall Group enrollment. Median (N=57) 30073. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison Master's. Group Median (N=57) 0.01. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 31495. MedianEnrollment (N=57) 26862. measure Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institutionDegree Group 1629. Median (N=57) 1759.level ItemGroup 1, 5,Your Part-time institution fall enrollment.6714. ItemGroup 1, 5,Your Bachelor's. institution 6302. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=57) 4663. GroupItem 2, 6, Comparison Associate's. Group Median (N=57) 5791. line, Shape Label: Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median (N=57) 0.01. InstitutionLegend, Shape Label: Your institution Shape ComparisonGroupLegend, Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57) line,Shape Label: End of image description. InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57) 349 Unduplicated 39,987 Doctor's Research/ Scholarship 394 headcount - total 36,115

Doctor's Professional 155 Unduplicated headcount 32,641 Practice 302 - undergraduates 27,615 Doctor's 0 Other 0 Total FTE 34,090 enrollment 30,073 1,629 Master's 1,759 Full-time 31,495 fall enrollment 26,862 6,302 Bachelor's 5,791

6,714 Part-time 0 Associate's fall enrollment 4,663 0

0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 Number of students Number of degrees Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=57) Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=57) NOTE: For details on calculating full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment, see Calculating NOTE: For additional information about postbaccalaureate degree levels, see the FTE in the Methodological Notes. Total headcount, FTE, and full- and part-time fall Methodology Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. enrollment include both undergraduate and postbaccalaureate students, when applicable. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2018, Completions SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, component. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2018, 12-month Enrollment component and Spring 2019, Fall Enrollment component.

Figure 6. Academic year tuition and required fees for full-time, Figure 7. Average net price of attendance for full-time, first-time first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates: degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students, who 2015-16 to 2018-19 were awarded grant or scholarship aid: 2015-16 to 2017- 18

Image description. Image description. HorizontalAcademic yearBar chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group. HorizontalAcademic yearBar chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group. YX scale titled ScaleTuition label. and fees. YX scale titled ScaleNet price. label. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your 2018-19. institution $9080. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your 2017-18. institution $15531. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison 2017-18. Group Median (N=57) $11276. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison 2016-17. Group Median (N=57) $16790. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $8860. Median (N=57) $10974. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $15820. Median (N=57) $16684. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your 2016-17. institution $8428. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your 2015-16. institution $15235. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison 2015-16. Group Median (N=57) $10761. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=57) $15945. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institutionAcademic Group $8028. Median (N=57) $10388. year line, Shape Label: Academic year Shape InstitutionLegend, Shape Label: Your institution line,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegend, Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57) InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution End of image description. ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57)

$9,080 2018-19 $15,531 $11,276 2017-18 $16,790

$8,860 2017-18 $10,974 $15,820 2016-17 $16,684 $8,428 2016-17 $10,761

$15,235 $8,028 2015-16 2015-16 $15,945 $10,388

$0 $2,000 $4,000 $6,000 $8,000 $10,000 $12,000 $0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 Tuition and fees Net price Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=57) Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=57) NOTE: The tuition and required fees shown here are the lowest reported from the NOTE: Average net price is for full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking categories of in-district, in-state, and out-of-state. N is the number of institutions in the undergraduate students and is generated by subtracting the average amount of federal, comparison group. state/local government, and institutional grant and scholarship awarded aid from the total SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, cost of attendance. Total cost of attendance is the sum of published tuition and required Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2018, Institutional fees, books and supplies, and the average room and board and other expenses. For Characteristics component. details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2018, Institutional Characteristics component and Winter 2018-19, Student Financial Aid component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 4 Texas Tech University

Figure 8. Percent of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking Figure 9. Average amounts of awarded grant or scholarship aid undergraduate students who were awarded grant or from the federal government, state/local government, or scholarship aid from the federal government, state/local the institution, or loans awarded to full-time, first-time government, or the institution, or loans, by type of aid: degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students, by 2017-18 type of aid: 2017-18

Image description. Image description. HorizontalType of aid Bar chart with 8 groups with 2 items per group. HorizontalType of aid Bar chart with 8 groups with 2 items per group. YX scale titled ScalePercent label. of students. YX scale titled ScaleAid dollars. label. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Any institution grant aid. 57. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Any institution grant aid $7454.(N=57). GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Federal grants. Group Median (N=57) 74. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Federal grants Group (N=57). Median $10233. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 25. Median (N=57) 22. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $4717. Median $4923. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Pell institution grants. 25. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Pell institution grants (N=57). $4661. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison State/local Groupgrants. Median (N=57) 22. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison State/local Groupgrants Median(N=56). $4638. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 15. MedianType (N=57) 22. of aid Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $6073. MedianType $4207. of aid ItemGroup 1, 5,Your Institutional institution grants. 46. ItemGroup 1, 5,Your Institutional institution grants $4724. (N=57). GroupItem 2, 6, Comparison Any loans. Group Median (N=57) 61. GroupItem 2, 6, Comparison Any loans Group(N=57). Median $7809. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 44. Median (N=57) 41. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $8237. Median $7418. ItemGroup 1, 7,Your Federal institution loans. 42. ItemGroup 1, 7,Your Federal institution loans $5511. (N=57). GroupItem 2, 8, Comparison Other loans. Group Median (N=57) 40. GroupItem 2, 8, Comparison Other loans Group (N=57). Median $5405. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 10. Median (N=57) 5. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $12802. Median $15131. Shape Shape line,Shape Label: line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,End of imageAny description. grant Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57) 57 ComparisonGroupLegend,End of imageAny description. grant Label: Comparison Group Median $7,454 aid 74 aid (N=57) $10,233

Federal 25 Federal $4,717 grants 22 grants (N=57) $4,923

Pell 25 Pell $4,661 grants 22 grants (N=57) $4,638

State/local 15 State/local $6,073 grants 22 grants (N=56) $4,207

Institutional 46 Institutional $4,724 grants 61 grants (N=57) $7,809 Any loans Any loans 44 $8,237 41 (N=57) $7,418

Federal 42 Federal $5,511 loans 40 loans (N=57) $5,405

Other loans Other loans 10 $12,802 5 (N=57) $15,131

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 $0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 Percent of students Aid dollars Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=57) Your institution Comparison Group Median NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid awarded from the federal NOTE: Any grant aid above includes grant or scholarship aid awarded from the federal government, state/local government, or the institution. Federal grants includes Pell grants government, state/local government, or the institution. Federal grants includes Pell grants and other federal grants. Any loans includes federal loans and other loans awarded to and other federal grants. Any loans includes federal loans and other loans awarded to students. For details on how students are counted for financial aid reporting, see Cohort students. Average amounts of aid were calculated by dividing the total aid awarded by the Determination in the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the total number of recipients in each institution. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2018-19, Student Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2018-19, Student Financial Aid component. Financial Aid component.

Figure 10. Retention rates of first-time bachelor's degree seeking Figure 11. Graduation and transfer-out rates of full-time, first-time students, by attendance status: Fall 2017 cohort degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates within 150% of normal time to program completion: 2012 cohort

Image description. Image description. HorizontalAttendance Bar status chart with 2 groups with 2 items per group. HorizontalMeasure Bar chart with 2 groups with 2 items per group. YX scale titled ScalePercent. label. YX scale titled ScalePercent. label. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Full-time institution retention 85. rate (N=57). ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Graduation institution rate, 60. Overall (N=57). GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Part-time retention Group Median rate (N=56). 91. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Transfer-out Group rate Median(N=34). 78. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 61. Median 65. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 27. Median 12. Shape Shape line,Shape Label: line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution Attendance status InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution Measure ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median

85 60 Full-time retention Graduation rate, rate (N=57) Overall (N=57) 91 78

61 27 Part-time retention Transfer-out rate rate (N=56) (N=34) 65 12

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Percent Your institution Comparison Group Median Your institution Comparison Group Median NOTE: Retention rates are measured from the fall of first enrollment to the following fall. NOTE: Graduation rate cohort includes all full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking Academic reporting institutions report retention data as of the institution's official fall undergraduate students. Graduation and transfer-out rates are the Student Right-to-Know reporting date or as of October 15, 2017. Program reporters determine the cohort with rates. Only institutions with mission to prepare students to transfer are required to report enrollment any time between August 1-October 31, 2017 and retention based on August transfer out. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of 1, 2018. Four-year institutions report retention rates for students seeking a bachelor's institutions in the comparison group. degree. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, the comparison group. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2018-19, Graduation SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Rates component. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2019, Fall Enrollment component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 5 Texas Tech University

Figure 12. Graduation rates of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates within 150% of normal time to program completion, by race/ethnicity: 2012 cohort

Image description. XBar scale chart titled with Scale 10 groups label. with 2 items per group. GroupY scale 1, titled Graduation Percent. rate, Overall (N=57). Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 60. Median 78. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your American institution Indian 70. or Alaska Native (N=57). GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Asian (N=57). Group Median 67. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 58. Median 80. ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Black institution or African 53. American (N=57). GroupItem 2, 5, Comparison Hispanic/ Latino Group (N=57). Median 62. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 55. Median 74. ItemGroup 1, 6,Your Native institution Hawaiian 50. or other Pacific Islander (N=52). GroupItem 2, 7, Comparison White (N=57). Group Median 70. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 63. Median 79. ItemGroup 1, 8,Your Two institution or more races56. (N=56). GroupItem 2, 9, Comparison Race/ethnicity Group unknown Median (N=56). 72. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 67. Median 76. ItemGroup 1, 10,Your 100Nonresident institution 61.alien (N=57). Item 2, Comparison Group Median 77. GraduationShape rates by race/ethnicity line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median 90 80 78 79 77 80 76 74 72 70 70 67 67 70 63 60 62 61 58 56 60 53 55 50 50 Percent 40 30

0 Graduation rate, American Indian or Asian Black or African Hispanic/ Native Hawaiian or White Two or Race/ethnicity Nonresident Overall (N=57) Alaska Native (N=57) (N=57) American (N=57) Latino (N=57) other Pacific Islander (N=52) (N=57) more races (N=56) unknown (N=56) alien (N=57)

Graduation rates by race/ethnicity

Your institution Comparison Group Median NOTE: For more information about disaggregation of data by race and ethnicity, see the Methodological Notes. The graduation rates are the Student Right-to-Know (SRK) rates. Median values for the comparison group will not add to 100%. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2018-19, Graduation Rates component.

Figure 13. Graduation rates of full-time, first-time degree/certificate- Figure 14. Bachelor's degree graduation rates of full-time, seeking undergraduates within 150% of normal time to first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates program completion, by type of aid: 2012 cohort within 4 years, 6 years, and 8 years: 2010 cohort

Image description. Image description. Type of aid Time to program completion XHorizontal scale titled Bar Percent. chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group. XHorizontal scale titled Bar Graduation chart with 3rate. groups with 2 items per group. GroupY scale 1, titled Pell Scalegrant. label. GroupY scale 1, titled 4 years. Scale label. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 51. Median (N=57) 69. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 34. Median (N=57) 49. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Stafford institution loan. 57. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your 6 years. institution 60. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Neither Pell Group grant Medianor Stafford (N=57) loan. 73. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison 8 years. Group Median (N=57) 75. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 64. Median (N=57) 82. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 62. Median (N=57) 77. Shape Type of aid Shape Time to program completion line,Shape Label: line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57) ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57)

51 34 Pell grant 4 years 69 49

57 60 Stafford loan 6 years 73 75

64 62 Neither Pell grant 8 years or Stafford loan 82 77

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent Graduation rate Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=57) Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=57) NOTE: Graduation rate cohort includes all full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking NOTE: The 4-, 6-, and 8-year graduation rates are calculated using the number of undergraduate students. Data were collected on those students, who at entry of the students who completed a bachelor's or equivalent degree from a cohort of students who cohort, were awarded a Pell Grant and students who were awarded a Subsidized Stafford entered the institution seeking a bachelor's or equivalent degree. For details, see the loan, but did not receive a Pell Grant. Graduation rates are the Student Right-to-Know Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. Medians rates. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in are not reported for comparison groups with less than three values. the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2018-19, 200% Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2018-19, Graduation Graduation Rates component. Rates component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 6 Texas Tech University

Figure 15. Award and enrollment rates of first-time, full-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates after 8 years of entry, by Pell status: 2010-11 cohort

Pell Non-Pell (N=57) (N=57)

Image description. XBar scale chart titled with Scale 10 groups label. with 2 items per group. GroupY scale 1, titled Received Percent. award in 4 years. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 26. Median (N=57) 42. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Received institution award 51. in 6 years. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Received award Group in Median 8 years. (N=57) 67. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 53. Median (N=57) 69. ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Still institution enrolled at 1. same institution. GroupItem 2, 5, Comparison Enrolled at Groupanother Median institution. (N=57) 1. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 31. Median (N=57) 22. ItemGroup 1, 6,Your Received institution award 37. in 4 years. GroupItem 2, 7, Comparison Received award Group in Median 6 years. (N=57) 51. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 63. Median (N=57) 77. ItemGroup 1, 8,Your Received institution award 65. in 8 years. GroupItem 2, 9, Comparison Still enrolled Group at same Median institution. (N=57) 78. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 1. Median (N=57) 0.01. ItemGroup 1, 10,Your 100Enrolled institution at another 26. institution. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=57) 16. CompletionShape and enrollment measures line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57) 90 77 78 80 67 69 70 63 65 60 51 53 51 50 42

Percent 37 40 31 30 26 26 22 20 16

10 1 1 1 0 0 Received award Received award Received award Still enrolled at Enrolled at Received award Received award Received award Still enrolled at Enrolled at in 4 years in 6 years in 8 years same institution another institution in 4 years in 6 years in 8 years same institution another institution

Completion and enrollment measures

Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=57) NOTE: Award measures are based on the highest award received after 8 years of entry and enrollment measures are based on students who did not receive an award after 8 years of entry. Student cohorts (i.e., First-time, full-time; First-time, part-time; Non-first-time, full-time; and Non-first-time, part-time) are degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students who entered the institution between July 1, 2010-June 30, 2011. Pell recipients are students with demonstrated financial need. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2018-19, Outcome Measures component.

Figure 16. Award and enrollment rates of first-time, part-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates after 8 years of entry, by Pell status: 2010-11 cohort

Pell Non-Pell (N=55) (N=57)

Image description. XBar scale chart titled with Scale 10 groups label. with 2 items per group. GroupY scale 1, titled Received Percent. award in 4 years. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 9. Median 7. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Received institution award 21. in 6 years. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Received award Group in Median 8 years. 33. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 24. Median 38. ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Still institution enrolled at 6. same institution. GroupItem 2, 5, Comparison Enrolled at Groupanother Median institution. 0.01. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 33. Median 34. ItemGroup 1, 6,Your Received institution award 10. in 4 years. GroupItem 2, 7, Comparison Received award Group in Median 6 years. 17. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 24. Median 38. ItemGroup 1, 8,Your Received institution award 29. in 8 years. GroupItem 2, 9, Comparison Still enrolled Group at same Median institution. 42. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median 0.01. ItemGroup 1, 10,Your 100Enrolled institution at another 50. institution. Item 2, Comparison Group Median 35. CompletionShape and enrollment measures line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median 90

60 50 50 42

Percent 38 38 35 40 33 33 34 29 30 24 24 21 17 20 9 10 7 10 6 0 0 0 0 Received award Received award Received award Still enrolled at Enrolled at Received award Received award Received award Still enrolled at Enrolled at in 4 years in 6 years in 8 years same institution another institution in 4 years in 6 years in 8 years same institution another institution

Completion and enrollment measures

Your institution Comparison Group Median NOTE: Award measures are based on the highest award received after 8 years of entry and enrollment measures are based on students who did not receive an award after 8 years of entry. Student cohorts (i.e., First-time, full-time; First-time, part-time; Non-first-time, full-time; and Non-first-time, part-time) are degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students who entered the institution between July 1, 2010-June 30, 2011. Pell recipients are students with demonstrated financial need. For more details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2018-19, Outcome Measures component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 7 Texas Tech University

Figure 17. Award and enrollment rates of non-first-time, full-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates after 8 years of entry, by Pell status: 2010-11 cohort

Pell Non-Pell (N=57) (N=57)

Image description. XBar scale chart titled with Scale 10 groups label. with 2 items per group. GroupY scale 1, titled Received Percent. award in 4 years. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 45. Median (N=57) 62. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Received institution award 56. in 6 years. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Received award Group in Median 8 years. (N=57) 69. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 58. Median (N=57) 70. ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Still institution enrolled at 0.01. same institution. GroupItem 2, 5, Comparison Enrolled at Groupanother Median institution. (N=57) 0.01. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 26. Median (N=57) 16. ItemGroup 1, 6,Your Received institution award 53. in 4 years. GroupItem 2, 7, Comparison Received award Group in Median 6 years. (N=57) 68. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 65. Median (N=57) 74. ItemGroup 1, 8,Your Received institution award 66. in 8 years. GroupItem 2, 9, Comparison Still enrolled Group at same Median institution. (N=57) 75. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 1. Median (N=57) 0.01. ItemGroup 1, 10,Your 100Enrolled institution at another 23. institution. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=57) 14. CompletionShape and enrollment measures line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57) 90

80 74 75 69 70 68 70 65 66 62 56 58 60 53 50 45 Percent 40 26 30 23 20 16 14

10 0 0 1 0 0 Received award Received award Received award Still enrolled at Enrolled at Received award Received award Received award Still enrolled at Enrolled at in 4 years in 6 years in 8 years same institution another institution in 4 years in 6 years in 8 years same institution another institution

Completion and enrollment measures

Figure 18. Award and enrollment rates of non-first-time, part-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates after 8 years of entry, by Pell status: 2010-11 cohort

Pell Non-Pell (N=57) (N=57)

Image description. XBar scale chart titled with Scale 10 groups label. with 2 items per group. GroupY scale 1, titled Received Percent. award in 4 years. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 39. Median (N=57) 45. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Received institution award 45. in 6 years. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Received award Group in Median 8 years. (N=57) 53. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 47. Median (N=57) 53. ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Still institution enrolled at 2. same institution. GroupItem 2, 5, Comparison Enrolled at Groupanother Median institution. (N=57) 0.01. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 35. Median (N=57) 25. ItemGroup 1, 6,Your Received institution award 31. in 4 years. GroupItem 2, 7, Comparison Received award Group in Median 6 years. (N=57) 40. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 40. Median (N=57) 50. ItemGroup 1, 8,Your Received institution award 41. in 8 years. GroupItem 2, 9, Comparison Still enrolled Group at same Median institution. (N=57) 52. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 1. Median (N=57) 1. ItemGroup 1, 10,Your 100Enrolled institution at another 37. institution. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=57) 25. CompletionShape and enrollment measures line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57) 90

60 53 53 50 52 47 50 45 45 40 40 41 Percent 39 37 40 35 31 30 25 25

10 2 0 1 1 0 Received award Received award Received award Still enrolled at Enrolled at Received award Received award Received award Still enrolled at Enrolled at in 4 years in 6 years in 8 years same institution another institution in 4 years in 6 years in 8 years same institution another institution

Completion and enrollment measures

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 8 Texas Tech University

Figure 19. Percent distribution of core revenues, by source: Fiscal Figure 20. Core expenses per FTE enrollment, by function: Fiscal year 2018 year 2018

Image description. Image description. Revenue source Expense function XHorizontal scale titled Bar Percent chart with of function 7 groups total. with 2 items per group. XHorizontal scale titled Bar Dollars chart withper FTE.7 groups with 2 items per group. GroupY scale 1, titled Tuition Scale and label. fees. GroupY scale 1, titled Instruction. Scale label. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 38. Median (N=55) 29. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $7232. Median (N=57) $14779. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your State institution appropriations. 23. ItemGroup 1, 2,Your Research. institution $5561. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Local appropriations. Group Median (N=55) 20. GroupItem 2, 3, Comparison Public service. Group Median (N=57) $10031. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median (N=55) 0.01. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $463. Median (N=57) $3303. ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Government institution grants12. and contracts.Revenue source ItemGroup 1, 4,Your Academic institution support. $3149. Expense function GroupItem 2, 5, Comparison Private gifts, Group grants, Median and contracts. (N=55) 19. GroupItem 2, 5, Comparison Institutional Group support. Median (N=57) $3918. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 5. Median (N=55) 9. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $1723. Median (N=57) $3382. ItemGroup 1, 6,Your Investment institution return. 5. ItemGroup 1, 6,Your Student institution services. $1544. GroupItem 2, 7, Comparison Other core Grouprevenues. Median (N=55) 2. GroupItem 2, 7, Comparison Other core Groupexpenses. Median (N=57) $1710. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 17. Median (N=55) 11. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $3201. Median (N=57) $2703. Shape Shape line,Shape Label: line,Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median (N=55) ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57) $7,232 Tuition and fees 38 Instruction 29 $14,779

State $5,561 23 Research appropriations 20 $10,031

Local $463 0 Public service appropriations 0 $3,303

Government grants $3,149 12 Academic support and contracts 19 $3,918 Private gifts, grants, $1,723 5 Institutional support and contracts 9 $3,382

$1,544 Investment return 5 Student services 2 $1,710

Other core 17 Other core $3,201 revenues 11 expenses $2,703

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 $0 $2,500 $5,000 $7,500 $10,000 $12,500 $15,000 Percent of function total Dollars per FTE Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=55) Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=57) NOTE: The comparison group median is based on those members of the comparison NOTE: Expenses per full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment, particularly instruction, may be group that report finance data using the same accounting standards as the comparison inflated because finance data includes all core expenses while FTE reflects credit activity institution. For more information, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of only. For details on calculating FTE enrollment and a detailed definition of core expenses, institutions in the comparison group. see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2019, Finance Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Fall 2018, 12-month component. Enrollment component and Spring 2019, Finance component.

Figure 21. Full-time equivalent staff, by occupational category: Fall Figure 22. Average salaries of full-time instructional non-medical 2018 staff equated to 9-months worked, by academic rank: Academic year 2018-19

Image description. Image description. HorizontalOccupational Bar category chart with 8 groups with 2 items per group. HorizontalAcademic rankBar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group. YX scale titled ScaleNumber label. of staff. YX scale titled ScaleAverage label. salary. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Postsecondary institution 1851. Teachers and staff. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your All ranksinstitution (N=57). $83840. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Instructional Group support Median occupations. (N=57) 2528. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Professor (N=57).Group Median $99960. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 109. Median (N=57) 432. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $126202. Median $134893. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Management. institution 430. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Associate institution professor $89901. (N=57). GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison Business and Group financial Median operations. (N=57) 595. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison Assistant professor Group Median (N=57). $97579. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 56. Median (N=57)Occupational 598. category Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $77260. Median $85321.Academic rank ItemGroup 1, 5,Your Computer, institution engineering, 259. and science. ItemGroup 1, 5,Your Instructor institution (N=50). $43182. GroupItem 2, 6, Comparison Community Group service, Median legal, (N=57)arts, and 816. media. GroupItem 2, 6, Comparison Lecturer (N=51). Group Median $54209. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 130. Median (N=57) 450. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group $40000. Median $59864. ItemGroup 1, 7,Your Healthcare. institution 8. ItemGroup 1, 7,Your No institutionacademic $48395.rank (N=31). GroupItem 2, 8, Comparison Other. Group Median (N=57) 190. Item 2, Comparison Group Median $61671. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 2124. Median (N=57) 2069. line, Shape Label: Shape InstitutionLegend, Shape Label: Your institution line,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegend, Shape Label: Comparison Group Median InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution End of image description. ComparisonGroupLegend,End Postsecondaryof image description. Label: Comparison Teachers Group Median (N=57) 1,851 All ranks $83,840 2,528 and staff (N=57) $99,960 Instructional support 109 $126,202 occupations 432 Professor (N=57) $134,893 Management 430 595 Associate professor $89,901 (N=57) $97,579 Business and financial 56 598 operations Assistant professor $77,260 (N=57) $85,321 Computer, engineering, 259 and science 816 Instructor $43,182 Community service, legal, 130 (N=50) $54,209 arts, and media 450 Lecturer $40,000 8 (N=51) $59,864 Healthcare 190 $48,395 2,124 No academic rank Other 2,069 (N=31) $61,671

0 500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 3,000 $0 $25,000 $50,000 $75,000 $100,000 $125,000 $150,000 Number of staff Average salary Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=57) Your institution Comparison Group Median NOTE: Graduate assistants are not included. For calculation details, see the NOTE: See Methodology Notes for more details on average salary. N is the number of Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2019, Human Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2019, Human Resources component. Resources component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 9 Texas Tech University

Figure 23. Percent distribution of library collection, by material Figure 24. Percent distribution of library expenses, by function: type: Fiscal Year 2018 Fiscal Year 2018

Image description. Image description. HorizontalMaterial type Bar chart with 7 groups with 2 items per group. HorizontalFunction Bar chart with 6 groups with 2 items per group. YX scale titled ScalePercent label. of library collection. YX scale titled ScalePercent label. of library expenses. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Physical institution books. 49. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Salaries institution and wages.35. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Digital/Electronic Group books.Median (N=57) 48. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Fringe benefits. Group Median (N=57) 38. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 3. Median (N=57) 24. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 12. Median (N=57) 10. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Physical institution media. 44. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your One-time institution purchases. 4. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison Digital/Electronic Group media.Median (N=57) 9. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison Ongoing commitments Group Median to (N=57)subscriptions. 5. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median (N=57) 2.Material type Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 41. Median (N=57) 35. Function ItemGroup 1, 5,Your Physical institution serials. 0.01. ItemGroup 1, 5,Your Other institution materials/services. 0.01. GroupItem 2, 6, Comparison Digital/Electronic Group serials.Median (N=57) 2. GroupItem 2, 6, Comparison Operations Group and maintenance. Median (N=57) 1. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 3. Median (N=57) 3. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 8. Median (N=57) 10. ItemGroup 1, 7,Your Databases. institution 0.01. Shape Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=57) 0.01. line,Shape Label: line, Shape Label: InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution InstitutionLegend, Shape Label: Your institution ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57) ComparisonGroupLegend, Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57) End of image description. 49 35 Physical books Salaries and wages 48 38

3 Digital/Electronic books 12 24 Fringe benefits 10 44 Physical media 9 4 One-time purchases 5 0 Digital/Electronic media 2 Ongoing commitments 41 0 to subscriptions 35 Physical serials 2 0 Other materials/services Digital/Electronic serials 3 1 3

0 8 Databases Operations and maintenance 0 10

0 10 20 30 40 50 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Percent of library collection Percent of library expenses Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=57) Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=57) NOTE: N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. NOTE: N is the number of institutions in the comparison group. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2019, Academic Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Spring 2019, Academic Libraries component. Libraries component.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 10 Texas Tech University

METHODOLOGICAL NOTES

Overview

This report is based on data supplied by institutions to IPEDS during 2018-19 data collection year. Response rates exceeded 99% for most surveys. IPEDS First Look reports at https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=010 provide some information on aggregate institutional responses. Furthermore, data used in this report are provisional level and may be revised for a limited time through the IPEDS Prior Year Revision system.

Use of Median Values for Comparison Group

This report compares your institution’s data to the median value for the comparison group for each statistic shown in the figure. If more than one statistic is present in a figure, the median values are determined separately for each indicator or statistic. Medians are not displayed for comparison groups with fewer than three values. Where percentage distributions are presented, median values may not add to 100%. To access all the data used to create the figures included in this report, go to ‘Use the Data’ portal on the IPEDS website at this provided link (https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds).

Missing Statistics

If a statistic is not reported for your institution, the omission indicates that the statistic is not relevant to your institution and the data were not collected. Not all notes may be applicable to your report.

Use of Imputed Data

All IPEDS data are subject to imputation for total (institutional) and partial (item) nonresponse. If necessary, imputed values were used to prepare your report.

Data Confidentiality

IPEDS data are not collected under a pledge of confidentiality.

Disaggregation of Data by Race/Ethnicity

When applicable, some statistics are disaggregated by race/ethnicity. Data disaggregated by race/ethnicity have been reported using the 1997 Office of Management and Budget categories. Detailed information about the race/ethnicity categories can be found at https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/Section/Resources.

Cohort Determination for Reporting Student Financial Aid, Graduation Rates, and Outcome Measures

Student cohorts for reporting Student Financial Aid and Graduation Rates data are based on the reporting type of the institution. For institutions that report based on an academic year (those operating on standard academic terms), student counts and cohorts are based on fall term data. Student counts and cohorts for program reporters (those that do not operate on standard academic terms) are based on unduplicated counts of students enrolled during a full 12-month period.

Student cohorts for reporting Outcome Measures are based on a full-year cohort from July 1-June 30 for all degree-granting institutions.

DESCRIPTION OF STATISTICS USED IN THE FIGURES

Admissions (only for non-open-admissions schools)

Admissions and Test Score Data

Admissions and test score data are presented only for institutions that do not have an open admission policy, and apply to first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students only. Applicants include only those students who fulfilled all requirements for consideration for admission and who were notified of one of the following actions: admission, non-admission, placement on a wait list, or application withdrawn (by applicant or institution). Admitted applicants (admissions) include wait-listed students who were subsequently offered admission. Early decision, early action, and students who began studies during the summer prior to the fall reporting period are included. For customized Data Feedback Reports, test scores are presented only if scores are required for admission.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 11 Texas Tech University

Student Enrollment

Enrollment Counts

12-month Enrollment captures a cumulative unduplicated headcount of enrollment over the full 12-month period beginning July 1 and ending June 30. In contrast, Fall Enrollment captures number of students enrolled on a particular date in the fall. Fall enrollment is often referred to as a "snapshot" of an institution"s enrollment at a specific time.

FTE Enrollment

The full-time equivalent (FTE) enrollment used in this report is the sum of the institution’s FTE undergraduate enrollment and FTE graduate enrollment (as calculated from or reported on the 12-month Enrollment component). Undergraduate and graduate FTE are estimated using 12-month instructional activity (credit and/or contact hours). See “Calculation of FTE Students (using instructional activity)” in the IPEDS Glossary at https://surveys.nces.ed.gov/ipeds/VisGlossaryAll.aspx.

Total Entering Undergraduate Students

Total entering students are students at the undergraduate level, both full- and part-time, new to the institution in the fall term (or the prior summer term who returned in the fall). This includes all first-time undergraduate students, students transferring into the institution at the undergraduate level, and non-degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates entering in the fall. Only degree-granting, academic year reporting institutions provide total entering student data.

Completions

Completions and Completers

Completions collects data on undergraduate and graduate completions and completers in a 12-month period. Completions are the counts of postsecondary awards granted where each award reported once but multiple awards may be reported for one recipient. Completers are the counts of students granted postsecondary awards. The count of completers is collected in two ways. The first way counts all completers, while the second way counts completers by award level (e.g., number of associate’s completers, number of bachelor’s completers).

Student Financial Aid

Financial Aid Recipients and Amounts

Student Financial Aid collects the counts of undergraduate students awarded different types of financial aid and the total amounts of aid awarded. The average dollar amount of aid awarded is then calculated. In addition, Student Financial Aid collects counts of full-time, first-time undergraduate student awarded aid and amounts of aid, and counts of undergraduate and graduate students receiving military educational benefits.

Charges and Net Price

Average Institutional Net Price

IPEDS collects data to calculate average net price at each institution for two groups of undergraduate students: those awarded grant aid and those awarded Title IV federal aid.

Average net price is calculated for full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates who were awarded grant or scholarship aid from the federal government, state/local government, or the institution anytime during the full aid year. For public institutions, this includes only students who paid the in-state or in-district tuition rate. Other sources of grant aid are excluded. Average net price is generated by subtracting the average amount of federal, state/local government, and institutional grant and scholarship aid from the total cost of attendance. Total cost of attendance is the sum of published tuition and required fees, books and supplies, and the average room and board and other expenses.

For the purpose of the IPEDS reporting, aid awarded refers to financial aid that was awarded to, and accepted by, a student. This amount may differ from the aid amount that is disbursed to a student.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 12 Texas Tech University

Retention, Graduation Rates, and Outcome Measures

Retention Rates

Retention rates are measures of the rate at which students persist in their educational program at an institution, expressed as a percentage. For four-year institutions, this is the percentage of first-time bachelors (or equivalent) degree-seeking undergraduates from the previous fall who are again enrolled in the current fall. For all other institutions this is the percentage of first-time degree/certificate-seeking students from the previous fall who either re-enrolled or successfully completed their program by the current fall. The full-time retention rate is calculated using the percentage of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates, while the part-time rate is calculated using the percentage of part-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates.

Graduation Rates and Transfer-out Rate

Graduation rates are those developed to satisfy the requirements of the Student Right-to-Know Act and Higher Education Act, as amended, and are defined as the total number of individuals from a given cohort of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates who completed a degree or certificate within a given percent of normal time to complete all requirements of the degree or certificate program; divided by the total number of students in the cohort of full-time, first-time degree/certificate-seeking undergraduates minus any allowable exclusions. Institutions are permitted to exclude from the cohort students who died or were totally and permanently disabled; those who left school to serve in the armed forces or were called up to active duty; those who left to serve with a foreign aid service of the federal government, such as the Peace Corps; and those who left to serve on an official church mission.

A further extension of the traditional Graduation Rates (GR) component which carries forward 100% and 150% graduation rates data previously reported in the GR component is the Graduation Rates 200% (GR200) component, which requests information on any additional completers and exclusions from the cohort between 151% and 200% normal time for students to complete all requirements of their program of study.

Transfer-out rate is the total number of students from the cohort who are known to have transferred out of the reporting institution (without earning a degree/award) and subsequently re-enrolled at another institution within the same time period; divided by the same adjusted cohort (initial cohort minus allowable exclusions) as described above. Only institutions with a mission that includes providing substantial preparation for students to enroll in another eligible institution are required to report transfers out.

Outcome Measures Data

Alternative measures of student success are reported by degree-granting institutions to describe the outcomes of four degree/certificate- seeking undergraduate student groups: First-time, full-time (FTFT); First-time, part-time (FTPT); Non-first-time, full-time entering (NFTFT); and Non-first-time, part-time entering (NFTPT). Additionally, each of the four cohorts collects data on two subcohorts: Pell grant recipients and non -Pell grant recipients. These measures provide the 4-year, 6-year, and 8-year award rates (or completions rates) after entering an institution. NCES calculates award rates by dividing a cohort’s or subcohort’s adjusted cohort into the number of total awards at 4-year, 6-year, and 8- year status points.

The initial cohort can be revised and take allowable exclusions resulting in an adjusted cohort. Institutions are permitted to exclude from the initial cohort students who died or were totally and permanently disabled; those who left school to serve in the armed forces or were called up to active duty; those who left to serve with a foreign aid service of the federal government, such as the Peace Corps; and those who left to serve on an official church mission.

The highest award and the type of award (i.e., certificate, Associate’s, or Bachelor’s) are reported at each status point. For students who did not earn an undergraduate award after 8-years of entry, the enrollment statuses are reported as either still enrolled at the institution, or subsequently transferred out of the institution. Unlike the Graduation Rates data, all institutions must report on a full-year cohort (students entering July 1 of one year to June 30 to the next) and on their transfer out students, regardless if the institution has a mission that provides substantial transfer preparation.

Finance

Core Revenues

Core revenues for public institutions reporting under GASB standards include tuition and fees; government (federal, state, and local) appropriations and operating and nonoperating grants/contracts; private gifts, grants, and contracts (private operating grants/contracts plus gifts and contributions from affiliated entities); sales and services of educational activities; investment income; other operating and nonoperating sources; and other revenues and additions (capital appropriations and grants and additions to permanent endowments). “Other core revenues” include federal appropriations, sales and services of educational activities, other operating and nonoperating sources, and other revenues and additions.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 13 Texas Tech University

Core revenues for private, not-for-profit institutions (and a small number of public institutions) reporting under FASB standards include tuition and fees; government (federal, state, and local) appropriations and grants/contracts; private gifts, grants and contracts (including contributions from affiliated entities); investment return; sales and services of educational activities; and other sources (a generated category of total revenues minus the sum of core and noncore categories on the Finance component). “Other core revenues” include government (federal, state, and local) appropriations, sales and services of educational activities, and other sources.

Core revenues for private, for-profit institutions reporting under FASB standards include tuition and fees; government (federal, state, and local) appropriations and grants/contracts; private grants/ contracts; investment income; sales and services of educational activities; and other sources (a generated category of total revenues minus the sum of core and noncore categories on the Finance component). “Other core revenues” include government (federal, state, and local) appropriations and other sources.

At degree-granting institutions, core revenues exclude revenues from auxiliary enterprises (e.g., bookstores and dormitories), hospitals, and independent operations. Non-degree-granting institutions do no report revenue from auxiliary enterprises in a separate category, and thus may include these amounts in the core revenues from other sources.

Core Expenses

Core expenses include expenses for instruction, research, public service, academic support, institutional support, student services, grant aid/scholarships and fellowships (net of discounts and allowances), and other functional expenses (a generated category of total expense minus the sum of core and noncore functions on the Finance component). Expenses for operation and maintenance of plant, depreciation, and interest are allocated to each of the other functions. Core expenses at degree-granting institutions exclude expenses for auxiliary enterprises (e.g., bookstores and dormitories), hospitals, and independent operations. Non-degree-granting institutions do not report expenses for auxiliary enterprises in a separate category and thus may include these amounts in the core expenses as other expenses. “Other core expenses” is the sum of grant aid/scholarships and fellowships and other expenses.

Endowment Assets

Endowment assets, for public institutions under GASB standards, and private, not-for-profit institutions under FASB standards, include gross investments of endowment funds, term endowment funds, and funds functioning as endowment for the institution and any of its foundations and other affiliated organizations. Private, for-profit institutions under FASB do not hold or report endowment assets.

Salaries and Wages

Salaries and wages for public institutions under GASB standards and private (not-for-profit and for-profit) institutions under FASB standards, include amounts paid as compensation for services to all employees regardless of the duration of service, and amounts made to or on behalf of an individual over and above that received in the form of a salary or wage.

Staff

FTE Staff

The full-time-equivalent (FTE) by occupational category is calculated by summing the total number of full-time staff and adding one-third of the total number of part-time staff. Graduate assistants are not included.

Equated Instructional Non-Medical Staff Salaries

Institutions reported the number of full-time nonmedical instructional staff and their salary outlays by academic rank, gender, and the number of months worked (9-, 10-, 11-, and 12-months). Salary outlays for staff who worked 10-, 11-, and 12-months were equated to 9-months of work by multiplying the outlays reported for 10-months by 0.90, the outlays reported for 11 months by 0.818, and the outlays reported for 12- months by 0.75. The equated 10-, 11-, and 12-outlays were then added to the outlays for instructional staff that worked 9-months to generate a total 9-month equated salary outlay. The total 9-month equated outlay was then divided by total number of instructional non-medical staff to determine an equated 9-month average salary. This calculation was done for each academic rank. Salary outlays were not reported for staff that work less than 9-months and were excluded.

Student-to-Faculty Ratio

Institutions can provide their institution’s student-to-faculty ratio (i.e., student-to-instructional staff) for undergraduate programs or follow the NCES guidance in calculating their student-to-faculty ratio, which is as follows: the number of FTE students (using Fall Enrollment survey data) divided by total FTE instructional staff (using the total Primarily instruction + Instruction/research/public service staff reported in Human Resources component and adding any not primarily instructional staff that are teaching a credit course). For this calculation, FTE for students is equal to the number of the full-time students plus one-third the number of part-time students; FTE for instructional staff is similarly calculated. Students in "stand-alone" graduate or professional programs (such as, medicine, law, veterinary, dentistry, social work, or public health) and instructional staff teaching in these programs are excluded from the FTE calculations.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 14 Texas Tech University

Additional Resources

Additional methodological information on the IPEDS components can be found in the publications available at https://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/getpubcats.asp?sid=010.

Additional definitions of variables used in this report can be found in the IPEDS online glossary available at this provided link https://surveys.nces.ed.gov/ipeds/VisGlossaryAll.aspx.

Visit the IPEDS Data Feedback Report resource page that provides instructions on creating a custom comparison report, FAQs, and video tutorials https://nces.ed.gov/Ipeds/Help/View/2.

IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 15