Image description. Cover Image End of image description. NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS What Is IPEDS? The Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS) is a system of survey components that collects data from about 6,400 institutions that provide postsecondary education across the United States. These data are used at the federal and state level for policy analysis and development; at the institutional level for benchmarking and peer analysis; and by students and parents, through the College Navigator (https://nces.ed.gov/collegenavigator/), an online tool to aid in the college search process. Additional information about IPEDS can be found on the website at https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds. What Is the Purpose of This Report? The Data Feedback Report is intended to provide institutions a context for examining the data they submitted to IPEDS. The purpose of this report is to provide institutional executives a useful resource and to help improve the quality and comparability of IPEDS data. What Is in This Report? The figures in this report provide a selection of indicators for your institution to compare with a group of similar institutions. The figures draw from the data collected during the 2018-19 IPEDS collection cycle and are the most recent data available. The inside cover of this report lists the pre-selected comparison group of institutions and the criteria used for their selection. The Methodological Notes at the end of the report describe additional information about these indicators and the pre-selected comparison group. Where Can I Do More with IPEDS Data? Each institution can access previously released Data Feedback Reports from 2005 and customize this 2019 report by using a different comparison group and IPEDS variables of its choosing. To learn how to customize the 2019 report, visit this resource page https://nces.ed.gov/Ipeds/Help/View/2. To download archived reports or customize the current Data Feedback Report, visit the ‘Use the Data’ portal on the IPEDS website https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds and click on Data Feedback Report. Texas Tech University Lubbock, TX Texas Tech University COMPARISON GROUP Comparison group data are included to provide a context for interpreting your institution’s statistics. If your institution did not define a custom comparison group for this report by July 13, 2018 NCES selected a comparison group for you. (In this case, the characteristics used to define the comparison group appears below.) The Customize Data Feedback Report functionality on the IPEDS Data Center at this provided link (https://nces.ed.gov/ipeds/datacenter/) can be used to reproduce the figures in this report using different peer groups. The custom comparison group chosen by Texas Tech University includes the following 57 institutions: Arizona State University-Tempe (Tempe, AZ) University of South Florida-Main Campus (Tampa, FL) Auburn University (Auburn, AL) University of Virginia-Main Campus (Charlottesville, VA) Clemson University (Clemson, SC) University of Washington-Seattle Campus (Seattle, WA) Florida State University (Tallahassee, FL) University of Wisconsin-Madison (Madison, WI) Georgia Institute of Technology-Main Campus (Atlanta, GA) Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University (Blacksburg, VA) Indiana University-Bloomington (Bloomington, IN) Washington State University (Pullman, WA) Iowa State University (Ames, IA) West Virginia University (Morgantown, WV) Kansas State University (Manhattan, KS) Louisiana State University and Agricultural & Mechanical College (Baton Rouge, LA) Michigan State University (East Lansing, MI) Mississippi State University (Mississippi State, MS) New Mexico State University-Main Campus (Las Cruces, NM) North Carolina State University at Raleigh (Raleigh, NC) Ohio State University-Main Campus (Columbus, OH) Oklahoma State University-Main Campus (Stillwater, OK) Oregon State University (Corvallis, OR) Pennsylvania State University-Main Campus (University Park, PA) Purdue University-Main Campus (West Lafayette, IN) Rutgers University-New Brunswick (New Brunswick, NJ) Texas A & M University-College Station (College Station, TX) The University of Alabama (Tuscaloosa, AL) The University of Tennessee-Knoxville (Knoxville, TN) The University of Texas at Austin (Austin, TX) University of Arizona (Tucson, AZ) University of Arkansas (Fayetteville, AR) University of California-Berkeley (Berkeley, CA) University of California-Los Angeles (Los Angeles, CA) University of Colorado Boulder (Boulder, CO) University of Connecticut (Storrs, CT) University of Florida (Gainesville, FL) University of Georgia (Athens, GA) University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (Champaign, IL) University of Iowa (Iowa City, IA) University of Kansas (Lawrence, KS) University of Kentucky (Lexington, KY) University of Louisville (Louisville, KY) University of Maryland-College Park (College Park, MD) University of Massachusetts-Amherst (Amherst, MA) University of Michigan-Ann Arbor (Ann Arbor, MI) University of Minnesota-Twin Cities (Minneapolis, MN) University of Mississippi (University, MS) University of Missouri-Columbia (Columbia, MO) University of Nebraska-Lincoln (Lincoln, NE) University of New Mexico-Main Campus (Albuquerque, NM) University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (Chapel Hill, NC) University of Oklahoma-Norman Campus (Norman, OK) University of Oregon (Eugene, OR) University of Pittsburgh-Pittsburgh Campus (Pittsburgh, PA) University of Rhode Island (Kingston, RI) University of South Carolina-Columbia (Columbia, SC) The figures in this report have been organized and ordered into the following topic areas: 1) Admissions (only for non-open-admissions schools) Fig. 1 and 2 Pg. 3 2) Student Enrollment Fig. 3 and 4 Pg. 3 and 4 3) Awards Fig. 5 Pg. 4 4) Charges and Net Price Fig. 6 and 7 Pg. 4 5) Student Financial Aid Fig. 8 and 9 Pg. 5 6) Military Benefits* [No charts applicable] 7) Retention and Graduation Rates Fig. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17 and 18 Pg. 5, 6, 7 and 8 8) Finance Fig. 19 and 20 Pg. 9 9) Staff Fig. 21 and 22 Pg. 9 10) Libraries* Fig. 23 and 24 Pg. 10 *These figures only appear in customized Data Feedback Reports (DFR), which are available through Use the Data portal on the IPEDS website. IPEDS DATA FEEDBACK REPORT 2 Texas Tech University Figure 1. Number of first-time undergraduate students who Figure 2. Percent of first-time undergraduate applicants admitted, applied, were admitted, and enrolled full and part time: and percent of admitted students enrolled full and part Fall 2018 time: Fall 2018 Image description. Image description. HorizontalAdmissions Bar measure chart with 4 groups with 2 items per group. HorizontalAdmissions Bar measure chart with 3 groups with 2 items per group. YX scale titled ScaleNumber label. of students. YX scale titled ScalePercent label. of students. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Applicants. institution 24452. ItemGroup 1, 1,Your Admitted. institution 71. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Admitted. Group Median (N=57) 30889. GroupItem 2, 2, Comparison Enrolled full Group time. Median (N=57) 65. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 17280. Median (N=57) 15970. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 35. Median (N=57) 31. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Enrolled institution full time. 6083. ItemGroup 1, 3,Your Enrolled institution part time.1. GroupItem 2, 4, Comparison Enrolled part Group time. Median (N=57) 5030. Item 2, Comparison Group Median (N=57) 0.01. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 88. MedianAdmissions (N=57) 31. measure line, Shape Label: Admissions measure Shape InstitutionLegend, Shape Label: Your institution line,Shape Label: ComparisonGroupLegend, Shape Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57) InstitutionLegend,Shape Label: Your institution End of image description. ComparisonGroupLegend,End of image description. Label: Comparison Group Median (N=57) 24,452 Applicants 71 30,889 Admitted 65 17,280 Admitted 15,970 35 Enrolled full time 31 6,083 Enrolled full time 5,030 1 88 Enrolled part time Enrolled part time 0 31 0 10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Number of students Percent of students Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=57) Your institution Comparison Group Median (N=57) NOTE: Admissions data are presented only for institutions that do not have an open NOTE: Admissions data are presented only for institutions that do not have an open admission policy, and apply to first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate admission policy, and apply to first-time, degree/certificate-seeking undergraduate students only. For details, see the Methodological Notes. N is the number of institutions in students only. For details, see the Methodological Notes. See 'Use of Median Values for the comparison group. Comparison Group' for how median values are determined. N is the number of institutions SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, in the comparison group. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2018-19, Admissions SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics, component. Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (IPEDS): Winter 2018-19, Admissions component. Figure 3. Percent of all students enrolled, by race/ethnicity, and percent of students who are women: Fall 2018 Image description. XBar scale chart titled with Scale 10 groups label. with 2 items per group. GroupY scale 1, titled American Percent. Indian or Alaska Native. Item 2,1, ComparisonYour institution Group 0.01. Median (N=57) 0.01. ItemGroup 1,