Yellow Foxglove Digitalis Grandiflora

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Yellow Foxglove Digitalis Grandiflora Yellow foxglove Digitalis grandiflora Description All parts of the plant are highly toxic. Habit Herbaceous, grows to a height of 2-3 ft with a spread of 1-1.5 ft, clump forming. Leaves Finely-toothed, medium green in color; ovate-lanceolate leaves (10 in long and 2 in wide), ones that appear on the basal rosettes are largest, becoming smaller as they rise up the stems. Stems Ridged; upright. Flowers Large, tubular, funnel-shaped, pendulous, soft, yellow flowers that are up to 2 in long, interior Source: MISIN. 2021. Midwest Invasive Species Information Network. Michigan State University - Applied Spatial Ecology and Technical Services Laboratory. Available online at https://www.misin.msu.edu/facts/detail.php?id=157. brown markings, bloom in terminal racemes that are up to 12 in long; blooms May through June. Fruits and Seeds Fruits are septicidal capsules. Habitat Native to southern Europe. Grows well in organically rich, consistently moist soils. Reproduction By self-seeding. Similar Straw foxglove (Digitalis lutea) and species of Beardtongue (Penstemon spp.). Monitoring and Rapid Response Hand-pulling can be effective; herbicides more effective with large infestations. Credits The information provided in this factsheet was gathered from the Hortipedia plant database, Missouri Botanical Garden and the USDA PLANTS Database. Individual species images that appear with a number in a black box are courtesy of the Bugwood.org network (http://www.invasive.org).Individual photo author credits may not be included due to the small display size of the images and subsequent difficulty of reading the provided text. All other images appear courtesy of Google (http://images.google.com). Source: MISIN. 2021. Midwest Invasive Species Information Network. Michigan State University - Applied Spatial Ecology and Technical Services Laboratory. Available online at https://www.misin.msu.edu/facts/detail.php?id=157..
Recommended publications
  • Towards Resolving Lamiales Relationships
    Schäferhoff et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010, 10:352 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2148/10/352 RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access Towards resolving Lamiales relationships: insights from rapidly evolving chloroplast sequences Bastian Schäferhoff1*, Andreas Fleischmann2, Eberhard Fischer3, Dirk C Albach4, Thomas Borsch5, Günther Heubl2, Kai F Müller1 Abstract Background: In the large angiosperm order Lamiales, a diverse array of highly specialized life strategies such as carnivory, parasitism, epiphytism, and desiccation tolerance occur, and some lineages possess drastically accelerated DNA substitutional rates or miniaturized genomes. However, understanding the evolution of these phenomena in the order, and clarifying borders of and relationships among lamialean families, has been hindered by largely unresolved trees in the past. Results: Our analysis of the rapidly evolving trnK/matK, trnL-F and rps16 chloroplast regions enabled us to infer more precise phylogenetic hypotheses for the Lamiales. Relationships among the nine first-branching families in the Lamiales tree are now resolved with very strong support. Subsequent to Plocospermataceae, a clade consisting of Carlemanniaceae plus Oleaceae branches, followed by Tetrachondraceae and a newly inferred clade composed of Gesneriaceae plus Calceolariaceae, which is also supported by morphological characters. Plantaginaceae (incl. Gratioleae) and Scrophulariaceae are well separated in the backbone grade; Lamiaceae and Verbenaceae appear in distant clades, while the recently described Linderniaceae are confirmed to be monophyletic and in an isolated position. Conclusions: Confidence about deep nodes of the Lamiales tree is an important step towards understanding the evolutionary diversification of a major clade of flowering plants. The degree of resolution obtained here now provides a first opportunity to discuss the evolution of morphological and biochemical traits in Lamiales.
    [Show full text]
  • Digitalis Poisoning After Accidental Foxglove Ingestion
    Issue: Ir Med J; Vol 114; No. 1; P245 Digitalis Poisoning after Accidental Foxglove Ingestion T. Popoola, E. Umana, J. Binchy Emergency Department, University Hospital Galway, Ireland. Abstract Presentation A 22-year-old man presented to the Emergency Department (ED) with a history of persistent gastrointestinal symptoms, drowsiness, light-headedness, blurred vision and numbness of the lips for a day after accidentally ingesting foxglove. Diagnosis Serial electrocardiography demonstrated significant changes ranging from sinus bradycardia to varying degrees of heart block with ST segment depression and T wave inversion in the inferior and anterolateral leads. A diagnosis of probable digitalis (cardiac glycoside) poisoning was made. Treatment After initial emergency medicine approach and assessment; his treatment included intravenous atropine, antiemetic, activated charcoal and Digibind with referral to the cardiology team for observation. Conclusion A high index of suspicion for digitalis toxicity in a symptomatic patient with unknown plant ingestion is crucial in the ED. This case also highlights the emergency management approach of such patients with atropine and activated charcoal. Introduction Digitalis poisoning from the therapeutic use of herbal cardiac glycosides (CG) continues to be a source of toxicity today 1. CG are found in a diverse group of plants, the commonest being, foxglove (Digitalis purpurea). Toxicity may occur after consuming juice or teas brewed from plant parts or after consuming leaves, flowers, or seeds from such plants 1. Case Report A 22-year old man presented to the Emergency Department (ED) with a history of persistent vomiting, abdominal discomfort, drowsiness, light-headedness, blurred vision and numbness of the lips for a day.
    [Show full text]
  • Indiana Medical History Museum Guide to the Medicinal Plant Garden
    Indiana Medical History Museum Guide to the Medicinal Plant Garden Garden created and maintained by Purdue Master Gardeners of Marion County IMHM Medicinal Plant Garden Plant List – Common Names Trees and Shrubs: Arborvitae, Thuja occidentalis Culver’s root, Veronicastrum virginicum Black haw, Viburnum prunifolium Day lily, Hemerocallis species Catalpa, Catalpa bignonioides Dill, Anethum graveolens Chaste tree, Vitex agnus-castus Elderberry, Sambucus nigra Dogwood, Cornus florida Elecampane, Inula helenium Elderberry, Sambucus nigra European meadowsweet, Queen of the meadow, Ginkgo, Ginkgo biloba Filipendula ulmaria Hawthorn, Crateagus oxycantha Evening primrose, Oenothera biennis Juniper, Juniperus communis False Solomon’s seal, Smilacina racemosa Redbud, Cercis canadensis Fennel, Foeniculum vulgare Sassafras, Sassafras albidum Feverfew, Tanacetum parthenium Spicebush, Lindera benzoin Flax, Linum usitatissimum Witch hazel, Hamamelis virginiana Foxglove, Digitalis species Garlic, Allium sativum Climbing Vines: Golden ragwort, Senecio aureus Grape, Vitis vinifera Goldenrod, Solidago species Hops, Humulus lupulus Horehound, Marrubium vulgare Passion flower, Maypop, Passiflora incarnata Hyssop, Hyssopus officinalis Wild yam, Dioscorea villosa Joe Pye weed, Eupatorium purpureum Ladybells, Adenophora species Herbaceous Plants: Lady’s mantle, Alchemilla vulgaris Alfalfa, Medicago sativa Lavender, Lavendula angustifolia Aloe vera, Aloe barbadensis Lemon balm, Melissa officinalis American skullcap, Scutellaria laterifolia Licorice, Glycyrrhiza
    [Show full text]
  • Plant Ingestion: Foxglove Toxinology Scott Phillips
    Plant ingestion: foxglove toxinology Scott Phillips On our planet, there are over 1 million scientifically-named plants (only a third of which are assigned species names). And there are 7.5 billion potential consumers of these plants! Throughout the world, poisoning information centers report plant ingestion as a common exposure. In 2015, The American Association of Poison Control Centers (AAPCC) reported over 45,000 plant exposures. Counted among the top ten are cardiac glycosides (digitalis, convallarin, ouabain, oleandrin, bufadienolide, and more). Cardiac glycoside plants contain multiple and diverse glycosides. As early as the 16th century, scientists suspected Foxglove’s beneficial medical effects, although it wasn’t until January 1785 that Erasmus Darwin (Charles Darwin’s grandfather) submitted to the College of Physicians in London An Account of the Successful Use of Foxglove in Some Dropsies and in Pulmonary Consumption, and later that same year, Willian Withering published the classic text An Account of the Foxglove and some of its Medical Uses. According to anecdote, Withering substantiated his theory about the medical benefits of Foxglove after procuring a tea recipe from Mother Hutton, an herbalist physician from Shropshire, England, whose name and image pharmaceutical manufacturer Parke-Davis used nearly 150 years later in a marketing campaign. Regardless of the wellspring, Withering’s description of treating a patient with dropsy whose weak irregular pulse became regular and more forceful after receiving Foxglove started scientists down the path of using digitalis for the treatment of dropsy, Figure 1. Typical North kidney disease and other cardiac ailments. Despite American habitat of Foxglove use as a remedy for over 200 years, most recently digitalis preparations have fallen out of favor clinically because, even with adequate digitalization, heart rates did not differ between treated and untreated patients.
    [Show full text]
  • Lamiales – Synoptical Classification Vers
    Lamiales – Synoptical classification vers. 2.6.2 (in prog.) Updated: 12 April, 2016 A Synoptical Classification of the Lamiales Version 2.6.2 (This is a working document) Compiled by Richard Olmstead With the help of: D. Albach, P. Beardsley, D. Bedigian, B. Bremer, P. Cantino, J. Chau, J. L. Clark, B. Drew, P. Garnock- Jones, S. Grose (Heydler), R. Harley, H.-D. Ihlenfeldt, B. Li, L. Lohmann, S. Mathews, L. McDade, K. Müller, E. Norman, N. O’Leary, B. Oxelman, J. Reveal, R. Scotland, J. Smith, D. Tank, E. Tripp, S. Wagstaff, E. Wallander, A. Weber, A. Wolfe, A. Wortley, N. Young, M. Zjhra, and many others [estimated 25 families, 1041 genera, and ca. 21,878 species in Lamiales] The goal of this project is to produce a working infraordinal classification of the Lamiales to genus with information on distribution and species richness. All recognized taxa will be clades; adherence to Linnaean ranks is optional. Synonymy is very incomplete (comprehensive synonymy is not a goal of the project, but could be incorporated). Although I anticipate producing a publishable version of this classification at a future date, my near- term goal is to produce a web-accessible version, which will be available to the public and which will be updated regularly through input from systematists familiar with taxa within the Lamiales. For further information on the project and to provide information for future versions, please contact R. Olmstead via email at [email protected], or by regular mail at: Department of Biology, Box 355325, University of Washington, Seattle WA 98195, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foxgloves (Digitalis) Revisited*
    Reviews The Foxgloves (Digitalis) Revisited* Author Wolfgang Kreis Affiliation Supporting information available online at Lehrstuhl Pharmazeutische Biologie, Department Biology, http://www.thieme-connect.de/products FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany ABSTRACT Key words Digitalis, Plantaginaceae, cardiac glycosides, plant biotech- This review provides a renewed look at the genus Digitalis. nology, biosynthesis, plant tissue culture, phylogeny Emphasis will be put on those issues that attracted the most attention or even went through paradigmatic changes since received March 17, 2017 the turn of the millennium. PubMed and Google Scholar were “ ” “ ” revised April 27, 2017 used ( Digitalis and Foxglove were the key words) to iden- accepted May 8, 2017 tify research from 2000 till 2017 containing data relevant enough to be presented here. Intriguing new results emerged Bibliography from studies related to the phylogeny and taxonomy of the DOI https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-111240 genus as well as to the biosynthesis and potential medicinal Published online May 23, 2017 | Planta Med 2017; 83: 962– uses of the key active compounds, the cardiac glycosides. 976 © Georg Thieme Verlag KG Stuttgart · New York | Several Eastern and Western Foxgloves were studied with re- ISSN 0032‑0943 spect to their propagation in vitro. In this context, molecular biology tools were applied and phytochemical analyses were Correspondence conducted. Structure elucidation and analytical methods, Prof. Dr. Wolfgang Kreis which have experienced less exciting progress, will not be Department Biology, FAU Erlangen-Nürnberg considered here in great detail. Staudtstr. 5, 91058 Erlangen, Germany Phone:+4991318528241,Fax:+4991318528243 [email protected] Taxus species is a prime example [4].
    [Show full text]
  • Digitalis Toxicity Randy Easterling, M.D., and Paul E
    J Am Board Fam Pract: first published as 10.3122/jabfm.2.1.49 on 1 January 1989. Downloaded from Digitalis Toxicity Randy Easterling, M.D., and Paul E. Tietze, M.D. Abstract: Digitalis toxicity is a frequently encoun­ bodies represents a significant advance in the treat­ tered clinical problem. Drug interactions leading to ment of this problem and can be lifesaving in digitalis toxicity are very common. Within this the setting of massive overdose. A case report of digi­ group, the interaction of digitalis and verapamil is talis toxicity and a review of this problem and its increasingly recognized as an important \:ause of treatment are presented. (J Am Bd Fam Pract 1989; digitalis toxicity. The use of digoxin-binding anti- 2:49-54.) Digitalis preparations are frequently prescribed, ble and had miotic pupils. The physical examination and a significant number of patients, especially was otherwise unremarkable. the elderly, take them regularly. Because of the A 12-lead electrocardiogram showed atrial fi­ ubiquitous use of this drug and the increased fre­ brillation with a high-grade delay in AV conduc­ quency of digitalis toxicity, the rapid diagnosis of tion. The Q-T interval was markedly shortened. digitalis toxicity is essential. Results from measur­ The ventricular rate was 31, and there were long ing digitalis blood levels can help the physician asystolic intervals in V4-V6. There was sagging of provide optimal care to patients. Where digitalis the SoT segments in leads II, III, and aVF and up­ levels are not available, the physician must de­ ward sloping SoT segments in aVR.
    [Show full text]
  • New Jersey Strategic Management Plan for Invasive Species
    New Jersey Strategic Management Plan for Invasive Species The Recommendations of the New Jersey Invasive Species Council to Governor Jon S. Corzine Pursuant to New Jersey Executive Order #97 Vision Statement: “To reduce the impacts of invasive species on New Jersey’s biodiversity, natural resources, agricultural resources and human health through prevention, control and restoration, and to prevent new invasive species from becoming established.” Prepared by Michael Van Clef, Ph.D. Ecological Solutions LLC 9 Warren Lane Great Meadows, New Jersey 07838 908-637-8003 908-528-6674 [email protected] The first draft of this plan was produced by the author, under contract with the New Jersey Invasive Species Council, in February 2007. Two subsequent drafts were prepared by the author based on direction provided by the Council. The final plan was approved by the Council in August 2009 following revisions by staff of the Department of Environmental Protection. Cover Photos: Top row left: Gypsy Moth (Lymantria dispar); Photo by NJ Department of Agriculture Top row center: Multiflora Rose (Rosa multiflora); Photo by Leslie J. Mehrhoff, University of Connecticut, Bugwood.org Top row right: Japanese Honeysuckle (Lonicera japonica); Photo by Troy Evans, Eastern Kentucky University, Bugwood.org Middle row left: Mile-a-Minute (Polygonum perfoliatum); Photo by Jil M. Swearingen, USDI, National Park Service, Bugwood.org Middle row center: Canadian Thistle (Cirsium arvense); Photo by Steve Dewey, Utah State University, Bugwood.org Middle row right: Asian
    [Show full text]
  • 1 of 9 the Hidden Gardens Species List 17/01/2018 Group Taxon
    1 of 9 The Hidden Gardens 17/01/2018 species list Group Taxon Common Name Earliest Latest Records acarine Acari various mites 2017 2017 4 annelid Lumbricus rubellus Red Worm 2017 2017 1 annelid Lumbricus terrestris Common Earthworm 2017 2017 1 bird Accipiter nisus Sparrowhawk 2016 2016 1 bird Aegithalos caudatus Long-tailed Tit 2012 2017 4 bird Carduelis carduelis Goldfinch 2012 2016 3 bird Chloris chloris Greenfinch 2012 2017 4 bird Columba livia Feral Pigeon 2012 2017 3 bird Columba palumbus Woodpigeon 2013 2017 2 bird Corvus corone Carrion Crow 2016 2016 1 bird Corvus monedula Jackdaw 2017 2017 1 bird Cyanistes caeruleus Blue Tit 2012 2017 4 bird Erithacus rubecula Robin 2012 2017 4 bird Fringilla coelebs Chaffinch 2012 2017 2 bird Larus canus Common Gull 2012 2012 1 bird Larus fuscus Lesser Black-backed Gull 2015 2015 2 bird Motacilla alba Pied Wagtail 2017 2017 1 bird Parus major Great Tit 2012 2017 3 bird Passer domesticus House Sparrow 2012 2012 1 bird Periparus ater Coal Tit 2013 2015 2 bird Phylloscopus collybita Chiffchaff 2014 2014 1 bird Phylloscopus trochilus Willow Warbler 2013 2015 2 bird Pica pica Magpie 2012 2017 3 bird Prunella modularis Dunnock 2012 2017 3 bird Pyrrhula pyrrhula Bullfinch 2012 2017 4 bird Regulus regulus Goldcrest 2016 2017 3 bird Spinus spinus Siskin 2012 2012 1 bird Streptopelia decaocto Collared Dove 2012 2012 1 bird Sturnus vulgaris Starling 2013 2015 2 bird Sylvia atricapilla Blackcap 2015 2015 2 bird Troglodytes troglodytes Wren 2012 2017 3 bird Turdus iliacus Redwing 2016 2016 2 bird Turdus merula
    [Show full text]
  • WLGF Pollinator Planting List
    Suggested Plant List for Pollinators, September 2014 This list has been produced by Jan Miller on behalf of the North Wales Wildlife Trust and Marc Carlton on behalf of the Wildlife Gardening Forum, at the request of the Welsh Government’s Pollinator Task Force. The authors recognise that producing planting lists for pollinators is not a straightforward exercise. There are still many areas where further research is required in order to improve our understanding of the needs of pollinating insects and the best planting schemes to cater for them. One of the Wildlife Gardening Forum’s aims is to promote more evidence-based research to increase our knowledge and understanding of this subject. This list is based on the compilers’ personal experience over many years as gardeners and naturalists, and incorporates Jan’s work investigating plants for butterflies on behalf of Butterfly Conservation and uses their data sent in by members over twenty years. The list includes a selection of forage plants useful for adult butterflies, moths, hoverflies, bumblebees and solitary bees, which together make up the vast majority of pollinators in Wales. Plants recommended as larval food plants for butterflies and some moths have also been included. Specialised lists of flowers that are recommended as forage for honeybees have been published for many years within the beekeeping community and so we have not specifically covered honeybees in our list, although many of the flowers on our list will be used by honeybees. The list is in two parts. The first part is a list of suggested garden plants. We have only selected flowers which are garden-worthy, easily obtainable, well-known, and widely acknowledged as being attractive to pollinating insects.
    [Show full text]
  • Purple Foxglove Digitalis Purpurea L
    purple foxglove Digitalis purpurea L. Synonyms: None Other common name: None Family: Plantaginaceae Invasiveness Rank: 51 The invasiveness rank is calculated based on a species’ ecological impacts, biological attributes, distribution, and response to control measures. The ranks are scaled from 0 to 100, with 0 representing a plant that poses no threat to native ecosystems and 100 representing a plant that poses a major threat to native ecosystems. Description Similar species: Purple foxglove cannot be easily Purple foxglove is a biennial or perennial herb with mistaken for any other species in Alaska. Although erect stems that grow 91 to 183 cm tall. Lower leaves Penstemon species can appear superficially similar to can grow up to 30 ½ cm long and 5 cm wide. They have purple foxglove, all Penstemon species in Alaska grow toothed margins and are soft-hairy above. Leaves less than 61 cm in height. Purple monkeyflower become progressively smaller up the stem. Purple (Mimulus lewisii) also looks superficially similar to foxglove grows as a rosette during the first year. In the purple foxglove but has branched stems without long second year, it produces a leafy stock bearing a tall spikes of flowers. spike of bell-shaped, nodding flowers, all of which originate from one side. Flowers are 4 to 6 cm long and Ecological Impact usually pink (although they can range from white to Impact on community composition, structure, and purple) with dark spots on their lower inside surfaces. interactions: Purple foxglove readily colonizes Fruits are ovoid and approximately 13 mm long with disturbed areas, forming dense patches that displace many minute seeds (Harris 2000, Whitson et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Digitalis Purpurea Foxglove
    TREATMENT OPTIONS from the book Weed Control in Natural Areas in the Western United States This does not constitute a formal recommendation. When using herbicides always read the label, and when in doubt consult your farm advisor or county agent. This is an excerpt from the book Weed Control in Natural Areas in the Western United States and is available wholesale through the UC Weed Research & Information Center (wric.ucdavis.edu) or retail through the Western Society of Weed Science (wsweedscience.org) or the California Invasive Species Council (cal-ipc.org). Digitalis purpurea Foxglove Family: Scrophulariaceae (figwort) NON-CHEMICAL CONTROL Cultural: grazing P Cultural: prescribed burning P smoke from plant is toxic, areas of infestation not conducive to burning Mechanical: mowing and cutting P would have to be repeated several times Mechanical: tillage P Mechanical: grubbing, digging or hand G hand pulling can be effective in spring when soils are moist pulling CHEMICAL CONTROL The following specific use information is based on published papers and reports by researchers and land managers. Other trade names may be available, and other compounds also are labeled for this weed. Directions for use may vary between brands; see label before use. 2,4-D P─F Imazapic NIA Aminocyclopyrachlor + chlorsulfuron P Imazapyr NIA Metsulfuron Aminopyralid P G Chlorsulfuron NIA Paraquat NIA Picloram Clopyralid P G Dicamba NIA Rimsulfuron NIA Sulfometuron NIA Glyphosate F─G Sulfosulfuron NIA Hexazinone NIA Triclopyr P E = Excellent control, generally better than 95% * = Likely based on results of observations of G = Good control, 80-95% related species FLW = flowering F = Fair control, 50-80% NIA = No information available P = Poor control, below 50% Fa = Fall Control includes effects within the season of treatment.
    [Show full text]