DOCSLIB.ORG

Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary: Proceedings of the 1998 Research Workshop, Seattle, Washington

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary: Proceedings of the 1998 Research Workshop, Seattle, Washington Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series MSD-01-04 Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary: Proceedings of the 1998 Research Workshop, Seattle, Washington U.S. Department of Commerce November 2001 National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Ocean Service Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management Marine Sanctuaries Division About the Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Marine Sanctuary Division (MSD) administers the National Marine Sanctuary Program. Its mission is to identify, designate, protect and manage the ecological, recreational, research, educational, historical, and aesthetic resources and qualities of nationally significant coastal and marine areas. The existing marine sanctuaries differ widely in their natural and historical resources and include nearshore and open ocean areas ranging in size from less than one to over 5,000 square miles. Protected habitats include rocky coasts, kelp forests, coral reefs, sea grass beds, estuarine habitats, hard and soft bottom habitats, segments of whale migration routes, and shipwrecks. Because of considerable differences in settings, resources, and threats, each marine sanctuary has a tailored management plan. Conservation, education, research, monitoring and enforcement programs vary accordingly. The integration of these programs is fundamental to marine protected area management. The Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series reflects and supports this integration by providing a forum for publication and discussion of the complex issues currently facing the National Marine Sanctuary Program. Topics of published reports vary substantially and may include descriptions of educational programs, discussions on resource management issues, and results of scientific research and monitoring projects. The series will facilitate integration of natural sciences, socioeconomic and cultural sciences, education, and policy development to accomplish the diverse needs of NOAA’s resource protection mandate. Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary: Proceedings of the 1998 Research Workshop, Seattle, Washington C. Edward Bowlby1, Barbara A. Blackie1, Julia K. Parrish2 Editors 1NOAA, Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary 2University of Washington, Department of Zoology and School of Aquatic & Fishery Sciences U. S. Department of Commerce Donald Evans, Secretary National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Scott B. Gudes, Under Secretary, Acting Silver Spring, Maryland National Ocean Service November 2001 Margaret Davidson, Assistant Administrator, Acting DISCLAIMER Report content does not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the National Marine Sanctuary System or the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute endorsement or recommendation. REPORT AVAILABILITY Electronic copies of this report may be downloaded from the National Marine Sanctuary System’s web site at www.sanctuaries.nos.noaa.gov. Hard copies may be obtained from the following address: National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Marine Sanctuaries Division SSMC4, N/ORM62 1305 East-West Highway Silver Spring, MD 20910 SUGGESTED CITATION Bowlby, C. Edward, Barbara A. Blackie, and Julia K. Parrish (editors). 2001. Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary: Proceedings of the 1998 Research Workshop, Seattle, Washington. Marine Sanctuaries Conservation Series MSD-01-04. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Marine Sanctuaries Division, Silver Spring, MD. 84 pp. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page TABLE OF CONTENTS.............................................................................................................i LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES ...........................................................................................ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY........................................................................................................iii INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................................1 PRESENTATIONS ....................................................................................................................3 Workshop Overview - Ed Bowlby...................................................................................3 Workshop Goals - Julia Parrish .......................................................................................3 Sanctuary Program - Todd Jacobs ...................................................................................4 Bigger NOAA Picture - Don Scavia ................................................................................6 Coastal Oceanography - Jerry Galt ..................................................................................9 Harmful Algal Blooms - Jim Postel...............................................................................11 Trawl Surveys and Habitat Types - Mark Zimmermann and Mark Wilkins ...................14 Geological Surveys - Pat McCrory ................................................................................18 Intertidal Ecology - Bob Paine.......................................................................................20 Sea Otter and Subtidal Surveys - Pat Iampietro .............................................................23 Pinniped Population Trends - Harriet Huber..................................................................26 Seabird Colonies - Julia Parrish.....................................................................................28 At-sea Distribution of Seabirds - Chris Thompson.........................................................31 FOCUS GROUP REPORTS.....................................................................................................35 Group Report on Nearshore Communities.....................................................................35 Group Report on Fish and Shellfish Biology .................................................................36 Group Report on Seabirds and Marine Mammals ..........................................................39 Group Report on Physical and Biological Oceanography...............................................42 Group Report on Cultural and Historical Resources ......................................................45 FINAL SYNTHESIS ................................................................................................................47 LITERATURE CITED .............................................................................................................50 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ......................................................................................................51 APPENDIX ..............................................................................................................................53 i LIST OF FIGURES AND TABLES Page Figure 1. Chart of Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary....................................................2 Table 1. Major Recommendations from the First Olympic Coast Marine Research Workshop...................................................................................................................54 Table 2. Agenda for the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary's Research Workshop 1998..........................................................................................................55 Table 3. List of Abstracts from the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary's Research Workshop 1998..........................................................................................................57 Table 4. List of acronyms used in the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary's Research Workshop 1998...........................................................................................73 Table 5. Participant list from the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary's Research Workshop 1998..........................................................................................................75 Table 6. Group discussion list provided to participants of the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary's Research Workshop 1998. ...........................................................82 Table 7. Final synthesis of recommendations from the Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary's Research Workshop 1998. .......................................................................84 ii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY The Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary (OCNMS or Sanctuary) planned and organized the 1998 Research Workshop as part of its mission to protect and improve understanding of its marine resources through research and education programs. The Sanctuary is also mandated to coordinate and facilitate information exchanges and sponsors periodic research workshops to that end. The goals of the 1998 Research Workshop were as follows: A. Highlight and prioritize research needs for the Sanctuary relative to the development of a framework for a five-year research plan; B. Build on results from the Olympic Coast Marine Research Workshop of 1996; C. Present recent/ongoing research; D. Share multi-disciplinary information; E. Select priority sites for multi-disciplinary studies; and F. Promote student participation and research. Pre-workshop information packets were sent to a targeted audience of marine scientists, resource managers, interested individuals, and students. This packet contained the major recommendations from the 1996 Research Workshop. It also contained a list of potential topics that would be
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Snps) in the Northeast Pacific Intertidal Gooseneck Barnacle, Pollicipes Polymerus
    University of Alberta New insights about barnacle reproduction: Spermcast mating, aerial copulation and population genetic consequences by Marjan Barazandeh A thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Systematics and Evolution Department of Biological Sciences ©Marjan Barazandeh Spring 2014 Edmonton, Alberta Permission is hereby granted to the University of Alberta Libraries to reproduce single copies of this thesis and to lend or sell such copies for private, scholarly or scientific research purposes only. Where the thesis is converted to, or otherwise made available in digital form, the University of Alberta will advise potential users of the thesis of these terms. The author reserves all other publication and other rights in association with the copyright in the thesis and, except as herein before provided, neither the thesis nor any substantial portion thereof may be printed or otherwise reproduced in any material form whatsoever without the author's prior written permission. Abstract Barnacles are mostly hermaphroditic and they are believed to mate via copulation or, in a few species, by self-fertilization. However, isolated individuals of two species that are thought not to self-fertilize, Pollicipes polymerus and Balanus glandula, nonetheless carried fertilized embryo-masses. These observations raise the possibility that individuals may have been fertilized by waterborne sperm, a possibility that has never been seriously considered in barnacles. Using molecular tools (Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms; SNP), I examined spermcast mating in P. polymerus and B. glandula as well as Chthamalus dalli (which is reported to self-fertilize) in Barkley Sound, British Columbia, Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Supplementary Materials for Tsunami-Driven Megarafting
    Supplementary Materials for Commented [ams1]: Please use SM template provided Tsunami-Driven Megarafting: Transoceanic Species Dispersal and Implications for Marine Biogeography James T. Carlton, John W. Chapman, Jonathan A. Geller, Jessica A. Miller, Deborah A. Carlton, Megan I. McCuller, Nancy C. Treneman, Brian Steves, Gregory M. Ruiz correspondence to: [email protected] This file includes: Materials and Methods Figs. S1 to S8 Tables S1 to S6 1 Material and Methods Sample Acquisition and Processing Following the arrival in June 2012 of a large fishing dock from Misawa and of several Japanese vessels and buoys along the Oregon and Washington coasts (table S1), we established an extensive contact network of local, state, provincial, and federal officials, private citizens, and Commented [ams2]: Can you provide more details, i.e. in what formal sense was this a ‘network’ with nodes and links, rather than a list of contacts? environmental (particularly "coastal cleanup") groups, in Alaska, British Columbia, Washington, Oregon, California, and Hawaii. Between 2012 and 2017 this network grew to hundreds of individuals, many with scientific if not specifically biological training. We advised our contacts that we were interested in acquiring samples of organisms (alive or dead) attached to suspected Japanese Tsunami Marine Debris (JTMD), or to obtain the objects themselves (numerous samples and some objects were received that were North American in origin, or that we interpreted as likely discards from ships-at-sea). We provided detailed directions to searchers and collectors relative to Commented [ams3]: Did you deploy a standard form/protocol for your contacts to use? Can it be included in the SM if so? sample photography, collection, labeling, preservation, and shipping, including real-time communication while investigators were on site.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Avian Predators in an Oregon Rocky Intertidal Community
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Christopher Marsh for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Zoology presented on May 24, 1983 Title: The Role of Avian Predators in an Oregon Rocky Intertidal Community Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy Dr. Bruce-Nenge Birds affected the community structure of an Oregon rocky shore by preying upon mussels (Mytilus spp.) and limpets (Collisella spp.).The impact of such predation is potentially great, as mussels are the competitively dominant mid-intertidal space-occupiers, and limpets are important herbivores in this community. Prey selection by birds reflects differences in bill morphology and foraging tactics. For example, Surfbird (Aphriza virgata) uses its stout bill to tug upright, firmly attached prey (e.g. mussels and gooseneck barnacles [Pollicipes polymerus]) from the substrate. The Black Turnstone (Arenaria melanocephala), with its chisel-shaped bill, uses a hammering tactic to eat firmly attached prey that are 1) compressed in shape and can be dislodged, or 2) have protective shells that can be broken by a turnstone bill. In addition, the Black Turnstone employs a push behavior to feed in clumps of algae containing mobile arthropods. Bird exclusion cages tested the effects of bird predation on 1) rates of mussel recolonization in patches (50 x 50 cm clearings), and 2) densities of small-sized limpets (< 10 mm in length) on upper intertidal mudstone benches. Four of six exclusion experiments showed that birds had a significant effect on mussel recruitment. These experiments suggested that the impact of avian predators had a significant effect on mussel densities when 1) the substrate was relatively smooth,2) other mortality agents were insignificant, and 3) mussels were of intermediate size (11-30 mm long).
    [Show full text]
  • Maritime Heritage Resources Management Guidance for Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary: Compliance to National Historic Preservation Act
    Maritime Heritage Resource Management Guidance 2018 for Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary Maritime Heritage Resources Management Guidance for Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary: Compliance to National Historic Preservation Act April 2018 olympiccoast.noaa.gov Maritime Heritage Resource Management Guidance 2018 for Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary Cover Photo: Excerpt from the 1853 U.S. Coast Survey reconnaissance of the western coast of the United States from Gray's Harbor to the entrance of Admiralty Inlet. Downloaded from https://historicalcharts.noaa.gov/historicals/preview/image/AR51-00-1853 on December 29, 2016. Page 2 Maritime Heritage Resource Management Guidance 2018 for Olympic Coast National Marine Sanctuary Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 5 Relationship to OCNMS Management Plan ............................................................................... 5 Scope of Maritime Heritage Resource Management Guidance .................................................. 5 Plans for Section 106 Programmatic Agreement ........................................................................ 6 Background Research ................................................................................................................. 8 Definitions ................................................................................................................................... 8 Historical Context
    [Show full text]
  • North Pacific Ocean
    468 ¢ U.S. Coast Pilot 7, Chapter 11 31 MAY 2020 Chart Coverage in Coast Pilot 7—Chapter 11 124° NOAA’s Online Interactive Chart Catalog has complete chart coverage 18480 http://www.charts.noaa.gov/InteractiveCatalog/nrnc.shtml 126° 125° Cape Beale V ANCOUVER ISLAND (CANADA) 18485 Cape Flattery S T R A I T O F Neah Bay J U A N D E F U C A Cape Alava 18460 48° Cape Johnson QUILLAYUTE RIVER W ASHINGTON HOH RIVER Hoh Head 18480 QUEETS RIVER RAFT RIVER Cape Elizabeth QUINAULT RIVER COPALIS RIVER Aberdeen 47° GRAYS HARBOR CHEHALIS RIVER 18502 18504 Willapa NORTH PA CIFIC OCEAN WILLAPA BAY South Bend 18521 Cape Disappointment COLUMBIA RIVER 18500 Astoria 31 MAY 2020 U.S. Coast Pilot 7, Chapter 11 ¢ 469 Columbia River to Strait of Juan De Fuca, Washington (1) This chapter describes the Pacific coast of the State (15) of Washington from the Washington-Oregon border at the ENCs - US3WA03M, US3WA03M mouth of the Columbia River to the northwesternmost Chart - 18500 point at Cape Flattery. The deep-draft ports of South Bend and Raymond, in Willapa Bay, and the deep-draft ports of (16) From Cape Disappointment, the coast extends Hoquiam and Aberdeen, in Grays Harbor, are described. north for 22 miles to Willapa Bay as a low sandy beach, In addition, the fishing port of La Push is described. The with sandy ridges about 20 feet high parallel with the most outlying dangers are Destruction Island and Umatilla shore. Back of the beach, the country is heavily wooded.
    [Show full text]
  • Kelp Forest Monitoring Handbook — Volume 1: Sampling Protocol
    KELP FOREST MONITORING HANDBOOK VOLUME 1: SAMPLING PROTOCOL CHANNEL ISLANDS NATIONAL PARK KELP FOREST MONITORING HANDBOOK VOLUME 1: SAMPLING PROTOCOL Channel Islands National Park Gary E. Davis David J. Kushner Jennifer M. Mondragon Jeff E. Mondragon Derek Lerma Daniel V. Richards National Park Service Channel Islands National Park 1901 Spinnaker Drive Ventura, California 93001 November 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .....................................................................................................1 MONITORING DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS ......................................................... Species Selection ...........................................................................................2 Site Selection .................................................................................................3 Sampling Technique Selection .......................................................................3 SAMPLING METHOD PROTOCOL......................................................................... General Information .......................................................................................8 1 m Quadrats ..................................................................................................9 5 m Quadrats ..................................................................................................11 Band Transects ...............................................................................................13 Random Point Contacts ..................................................................................15
    [Show full text]
  • Growing Goosenecks: a Study on the Growth and Bioenergetics
    GROWING GOOSENECKS: A STUDY ON THE GROWTH AND BIOENERGETICS OF POLLIPICES POLYMERUS IN AQUACULTURE by ALEXA ROMERSA A THESIS Presented to the Department of Biology and the Graduate School of the University of Oregon in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science September 2018 THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Student: Alexa Romersa Title: Growing Goosenecks: A study on the growth and bioenergetics of Pollicipes polymerus in aquaculture This thesis has been accepted and approved in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Master of Science degree in the Department of Biology by: Alan Shanks Chairperson Richard Emlet Member Aaron Galloway Member and Janet Woodruff-Borden Vice Provost and Dean of the Graduate School Original approval signatures are on file with the University of Oregon Graduate School. Degree awarded September 2018 ii © 2018 Alexa Romersa This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike (United States) License. iii THESIS ABSTRACT Alexa Romersa Master of Science Department of Biology September 2018 Title: Growing Goosenecks: A study on the growth and bioenergetics of Pollicipes polymerus in aquaculture Gooseneck Barnacles are a delicacy in Spain and Portugal and a species harvested for subsistence or commercial fishing across their global range. They are ubiquitous on the Oregon coastline and grow in dense aggregation in the intertidal zone. Reproductive biology of the species makes them particularly susceptible to overfishing, and in the interest of sustainability, aquaculture was explored as one option to supply a commercial product without impacting local ecological communities. A novel aquaculture system was developed and tested that caters to the unique feeding behavior of Pollicipes polymerus.
    [Show full text]
  • Biodiversity of Barnacles on Long Island on the North and South Shores of Long Island from Public Location Are Factors That Affect the Specie That Lives in That Area
    Abstract Methods Barnacles have a vast number of species and exist in The collection of barnacles occurred in various places abundance in marine environments, and water depth and Biodiversity of Barnacles on Long Island on the North and South shores of Long Island from public location are factors that affect the specie that lives in that area. Authors: Paige Bzdyk, Frederick Nocella, Sophia Sherman areas such as docks, bulkheads, and man made jetties using By sequencing the DNA using the barcoding guidelines, the Teacher: Ms. Claire Birone a clam knife. Five barnacles were collected from each objective of the project was to determine the variation of Babylon Junior-Senior High School collection site. barnacle species in the different bodies of water on the North The barnacle DNA was processed by using standard DNA and South shores of Long Island. The most important materials extraction techniques and equipment given to use by the needed were DNA reagents and the samples of barnacles from Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. DNA subway was used to the Long Island Sound and the Great South Bay. The trim the DNA sequences, and it was compared to genbank to significant methods and materials include PCR and DNA identify sequences and known species. Phylogenetic trees reagents. Our results concluded that our hypothesis was were created using DNA subway to compare the barnacle incorrect as there was not a difference in species of the samples samples that were collected. collected as the organisms were all identified as Semibalanus Results balanoides through DNA Subway. The results from sequencing the DNA of the barnacles from the North and South shores showed that the species, Introduction Semibalanus balanoides, is the same on both shores.
    [Show full text]
  • Impacts of the Pisaster Ochraceus Collapse on Intertidal Communities an Honors Thesis Submit
    Changing Communities: Impacts of the Pisaster ochraceus Collapse on Intertidal Communities An Honors Thesis Submitted to the Department of Biology in partial fulfillment of the Honors Program STANFORD UNIVERSITY by Roberto Guzman November 2015 Acknowledgments I’d like to thank Terry Root and the Woods Institute for their MUIR Grant that made this all possible. And also for teaching me on the importance of an interdisciplinary education. I’d also like to thank my advisor, Fiorenza Micheli, for her assistance, expertise, patience, and ideas that helped throughout this project, every step of the way. Whether it was helping with setting up the projects, analyzing the results with me, or just coming out to the intertidal zone with me to help with field work, without you, this project and my thesis would not exist. Thank you Mark Denny for your contribution to my thesis. I appreciate not only your help as a second reader, but as someone who was able to contribute fresh eyes to my thesis, providing me with valuable insight of things I may have missed after working on the thesis. I am also grateful for the assistance of James Watanabe. Whether it was his expertise in the biology of the intertidal zone, or his quadrat camera setup, the success of the project lends itself to his efforts and generosity. A lot of appreciation goes to Steve Palumbi for providing me with financial assistance this year. You have not only helped me with it, but also my family. Your generosity will not be forgotten. For assisting me in fieldwork and making it more enjoyable, I’d like to thank Gracie Singer.
    [Show full text]
  • Intertidal Zonation Does Species Diversity Decrease with Tidal Height?
    Intertidal Zonation Does Species Diversity Decrease with Tidal Height? Biology 4741574 Summer 2004 Student Report by Wendy Cecil, Kate Olsen, Susan Shrimpton, Laura Wimpee Jonathan ~eischner, Matthew Osborne-Koch, Sylvia Yamada and Alicia Helms, Instructors - Perhaps no other community has captured the attention of field ecologists like the rocky intertidal zone. This fascinating transition zone between land and sea allows ecologists to study patterns of species distributions, abundance and diversity. The most striking observation one makes when visiting a rocky seashore is that organisms are distributed in horizontal bands. From the low to the high tide mark one can readily identifl zones dominated by the brown kelp Laminara, pink encrusting coralline algae, dark blue mussel beds, white barnacles, littorine snails, and finally black lichens (Figure 1). Linoflna/Pelvetia/Chrhamalusbelt Figure 1. Typical Pattern of intertidal zonation of organisms. Intertidal zonation, just like altitudinal and latitudinal zonation, is a reflection of organisms' responses to physical gradients and biological interactions (Merriam 1894, Whitta.ker 1975). Intertidal zonation is unique in that the physical gradients are very steep (e.g. a 12 ft. tidal range versus hundreds of miles in latitudinal zonation). Organisms living in the low tidal zone spend over 80% of their time in the benign and constant marine environment, while the reverse is true for organisms living in the high zone (Figure 2). At Mean Sea Level organisms spend equal amounts of time being immersed in seawater and exposed to air. Since intertidal organisms (with some exception such as mites and insects) originated in the sea, species diversity decreases up the shore.
    [Show full text]
  • Juan De Fuca 6 Highway 7 4 3 2 Itinerary #1 1 History & Culture
    Washington 10 State Route 112 8 9 The Strait of 5 JUAN DE FUCA 6 HIGHWAY 7 4 3 2 ITINERARY #1 1 HISTORY & CULTURE Highway 112 has 1. Elwha River Restoration This self-guided center presents an overview of the largest dam removal project in the United States occurring on the nearby Elwha River. Nature trails lead from the parking lot to views a long and of the Elwha River gorge and the former Elwha Dam site. 2. Camp Hayden 1941-1948 Camp Hayden served as a coastal artillery camp during WWII and varied history. the bunkers are still in place, and is named after Brigadier General John L. Hayden, the former commanding You’ll find many fascinating points of officer of the Puget Sound Harbor Defense. Explore the bunkers and take a step back in history to a time when interest well worth exploring. Sections the outcome of the Great War was still unknown. You can drive through one bunker, and there is another that of Hwy. 112 have been designated you can explore on the trail to Striped Peak. It’s next to Salt Creek Recreational Area, so make a day of it! Korean and Vietnam War Memorial 3. Joyce Depot Museum The Joyce Depot Museum features the histories of early settlers and is Highways. As you make your way housed in the old Chicago/Milwaukee/St. Paul railroad station that served Joyce from 1915 to 1951. Check along Hwy. 112, be sure to take out maps that show how passenger trains traveled from Port Townsend to Twin Creeks (the Twin), examine them in.
    [Show full text]
  • Intertidal Zones Cnidaria (Stinging Animals)
    Intertidal Zones Cnidaria (stinging animals) Green anemone (Anthopleura anthogrammica) The green anemone is mainly an outer-coast species. Microscopic algae live symbiotically inside this anemone, give the anemone its green color, and provide it with food from photosynthesis. The green anemone can be solitary or live in groups, and are often found in tidepools. This anemone only reproduces sexually. Touch the anemone very gently with one wet finger and see how it feels! Aggregating anemone (Anthopleura elegantissima) The aggregating anemone reproduces both sexually and asexually. It reproduces sexually by releasing eggs and sperm into the water. To reproduce asexually, it stretches itself into an oval column, and then keeps “walking away from itself” until it splits in half. The two “cut” edges of a half-anemone heal together, forming a complete, round column, and two clones instead of one. Aggregate anemone colonies are known for fighting with other colonies of these asexually- produced clones. When different clone colonies meet they will attack each other by releasing the stinging cells in their tentacles. This warfare usually results in an open space between two competing clone colonies known as “a neutral zone”. Aggregate anemones also house symbiotic algae that give the animal its green color. The rest of the food it needs comes from prey items captured by the stinging tentacles such as small crabs, shrimp, or fish. Genetically identical, clones can colonize and completely cover rocks. Be very careful when walking on the rocks…aggregating anemones are hard to spot at first and look like sandy blobs. Watch where you step so you don’t crush anemone colonies.
    [Show full text]