Questions and Answers
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
1787 PROOF LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS No. 96 TUESDAY 14 AUGUST 2012 (The Questions and Answers Paper published for the first sitting day in each week will contain, by number and title, all unanswered questions, together with questions to which answers have been received on the previous sitting and any new questions. On subsequent days, new questions are printed, as are questions to which answers were received the previous day. Consequently the full text of any question will be printed only twice: when notice is given; and, when answered.) Notice given on date shown 1788 Legislative Council Questions and Answers No. 96— Tuesday 14 August 2012 Publication of Questions Answer to be lodged by Q & A No. 84 (Including Question Nos 1512 to 1520) 26 June 2012 Q & A No. 85 (Including Question Nos 1521 to 1556) 27 June 2012 Q & A No. 86 (Including Question Nos 1557 to 1567) 28 June 2012 Q & A No. 87 (Including Question Nos 1570 to 1571) 03 July 2012 Q & A No. 88 (Including Question Nos 1572 to 1591) 04 July 2012 Q & A No. 89 (Including Question Nos 1592 to 1603) 05 July 2012 Q & A No. 90 (Including Question Nos 1604 to 1629) 17 July 2012 Q & A No. 91 (Including Question Nos 1630 to 1631) 18 July 2012 Q & A No. 92 (Including Question Nos 1632 to 1651) 19 July 2012 Q & A No. 93 (Including Question Nos 1652 to 1665) 24 July 2012 Q & A No. 94 (Including Question Nos 1666 to 1699) 25 July 2012 Q & A No. 95 (Including Question Nos 1700 to 1771) 26 July 2012 Q & A No. 96 (Including Question Nos 1772 to 1888) 18 September 2012 1789 Legislative Council Questions and Answers No. 96— Tuesday 14 August 2012 22 MAY 2012 (Paper No. 84) *1512 RESOURCES AND ENERGY—WALLERAWANG POWER STATION—Mr Donnelly asked the Minister for Roads and Ports representing the Minister for Resources and Energy, Special Minister of State, and Minister for the Central Coast— With respect to the land that is owned by Delta Electricity beneath and around Wallerawang Power Station, including buffer zones and public access areas, how many separate sites are located where asbestos or materials containing asbestos are buried? Answer— Two. One site was closed in the 1960s and the remaining site is managed in accordance with the Contaminated Lands Act. There is no public access to these areas. *1518 PREMIER—GOVERNMENT'S USER CHARGES POLICY—Mr Primrose asked the Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Minister for the Hunter, and Vice-President of the Executive Council representing the Premier, and Minister for Western Sydney— (a) Is the Government's User Charges Policy being reviewed by the Department of Premier and Cabinet's Community Engagement and Events Division? (b) If so, when is the review expected to be finalised? Answer— The Protocol and Special Events branch in the Department of Premier and Cabinet is reviewing the Whole of Government Policy for the Application of User Charges for Major and Special Events and discussions with key stakeholders are ongoing. *1519 POLICE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES—NSW POLICE FORCE'S USER CHARGES POLICY—Mr Primrose asked the Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Minister for the Hunter, and Vice- President of the Executive Council— (1) In 2011, was the Hawkesbury District Agricultural Association levied under the New South Wales Police Force's User Charges Policy? (2) If so, what was the amount of the charges levied on the Association? (3) In 2012, was the Hawkesbury District Agricultural Association levied under the New South Wales Police Force's User Charges Policy? (4) If so, what was the amount of the charges levied on the Association? Answer— The NSW Police Force has advised me that the NSW Police Force's User Charges Policy complies with the NSW Government User Charges Policy which outlines criteria under which exemptions or waivers may be granted by Government agencies. I am advised that the Hawkesbury Agricultural Show has been levied under the NSW Police Force User Charges and Cost Recovery Policy in previous years and provided substantial discounts. The NSW Police Force does not make a profit from this policy and only recovers costs. These charges help to ensure that policing strength is maintained across a Local Area Command during the time an event is being run. Local Area Commanders review each application for policing services for the event and apply the NSW Police Force's User Charges Policy to determine any application from the organisation for a fee exemption or reduction. If the Hawkesbury District Agricultural Association wishes to query a quote received for the policing of their event, they may seek an internal review by writing directly to their NSW Police Force Local Area Commander. 1790 Legislative Council Questions and Answers No. 96— Tuesday 14 August 2012 *1520 POLICE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES—NSW POLICE FORCE'S CHARGES POLICY—Mr Primrose asked the Minister for Police and Emergency Services, Minister for the Hunter, and Vice- President of the Executive Council— (1) In 2011, which agricultural show societies were levied under the New South Wales Police Force's User Charges Policy? (2) What was the amount of the charges levied on each society? (3) In 2012, which agricultural show societies to date have been levied under the New South Wales Police Force's User Charges Policy? (4) What was the amount of the charges levied on each society? Answer— The NSW Police Force has advised me that its User Charges Policy complies with the NSW Government User Charges Policy, which outlines criteria under which exemptions or waivers may be granted by Government agencies. These criteria include whether an event is being run solely for the benefit of a charitable or community organisation. In accordance with this policy, agricultural shows are considered special events and may be considered for an exemption or reduction in user charges fees, depending on an assessment by the relevant Local Area Commander against particular criteria, including whether the event is free of charge to spectators or not. 23 MAY 2012 (Paper No. 85) *1521 PRIMARY INDUSTRIES—YIELD REVIEWS—Mr Shoebridge asked the Minister for Roads and Ports representing the Minister for Primary Industries, and Minister for Small Business— (1) How frequently are yield reviews of state forests conducted by Forests NSW? (2) What are the 2012⁄2013 predicted yields for the following areas of state forest in New South Wales: (a) Central Region? (b) Northeast Region? (c) Southern Region? (d) Western Region? (3) What is the required yield from each of the following areas of state forest for 2012⁄2013 under the 2004 Wood Supply Agreement: (a) Central Region? (b) Northeast Region? (c) Southern Region? (d) Western Region? (4) What strategies are in place to adjust Wood Supply Agreements in light of yield reviews undertaken by Forests NSW? Answer— (1) As required for internal planning and external reporting purposes. The South Coast, Tumbarumba and Eden were recently reviewed and are available on Forests NSW website. The NSW Auditor General reviewed Forests NSW hardwood yield estimates in 2009 and published the results in its report "Sustaining Native Forest Operations". (2) Yield forecasts are usually modelled over a five year period and are published on Forests NSW website: www.dpi.nsw.gov.au⁄forests⁄management⁄reporting⁄audit. (3) This question cannot be answered in its current form, as there is not one "2004 Wood Supply Agreement" covering these regions. (4) With reference to the regions referred to in Questions (2) and (3), there are no strategies in place to adjust Wood Supply Agreements in light of the yield reviews undertaken by Forests NSW. 1791 Legislative Council Questions and Answers No. 96— Tuesday 14 August 2012 *1522 PRIMARY INDUSTRIES—FORESTS NSW TENDERING PRACTICES—Mr Shoebridge asked the Minister for Roads and Ports representing the Minister for Primary Industries, and Minister for Small Business— (1) How many harvesting contracts were issued by Forests NSW for the following periods: (a) 2009⁄2010? (b) 2010⁄2011? (c) 2011 to date? (2) Of the harvesting contracts issued by Forests NSW during the following periods, how many were made available for public tender: (a) 2009⁄2010? (b) 2010⁄2011? (c) 2011 to date? (3) Of the harvesting contracts issued by Forests NSW during the following periods, how many were not made available for public tender: (a) 2009⁄2010? (b) 2010⁄2011? (c) 2011 to date? (4) For each of the tenders with harvesting contractors that were not made public between 2009 and 2012, what reasons were given by Forests NSW for awarding the contract without a public call for tender? (5) Of the tenders awarded to contractors over the following periods, how many tenders were awarded to operators working in Tasmania, or to operators who have worked in Tasmania within the last three years: (a) 2009⁄2010? (b) 2010⁄2011? (c) 2011 to date? Answer— (1) (a) 10 (b) 24 (c) 34 (2) and (3) The majority of harvesting work for Forests NSW was made available through public tender at some stage. Due to reasons outlined in (4) below, the expiry of contracts or the withdrawal of services by contractors does not always coincide with the planned timeframes for tendering. The current harvesting work not under a long-term contract has been tendered recently and letting of contracts is expected by the end of 2012. (4) Forests NSW has over recent years engaged the services of contractors to undertake forest harvesting activities on a short term basis (6 months to 2 years) through direct negotiation. Short term engagement of contractors is essential pending the letting of long-term contracts by tender and has regard to: changing market conditions; required and available contractor capacity; and climatic conditions (ie wet weather).