DOCSLIB.ORG

Coyote Creek Northeast Management Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Coyote Creek Northeast Management Plan Coyote Creek Northeast Management Plan November 2016 - DRAFT Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 4034 Fairview Industrial Drive SE Salem, Oregon 97302 LIST OF CONTRIBUTORS The following individuals, consisting of Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife biologists and program coordinators, provided valuable input into this plan: • Chris Vogel, Restoration and Monitoring Biologist • David Speten, Fern Ridge Wildlife Area Manager • David Stroppel, Habitat Program Manager, South Willamette Watershed • Bernadette Graham-Hudson, Fish and Wildlife Operations and Policy Analyst • Steve Marx, West Region Manager • Doug Cottam, South Willamette Watershed District Manager • Laura Tesler, Willamette Wildlife Mitigation Program Coordinator • Ann Kreager, Willamette Wildlife Mitigation Project Biologist • Colin Tierney, Assistant Habitat Biologist • Susan Barnes, West Region Regional Conservation Biologist In addition, the following individuals provided input to the development of this plan: • Diane Steeck, Wetland Ecologist, City of Eugene • Paul Gordon, Wetland Technical Specialist, City of Eugene • Emily Steel, Ecologist, City of Eugene • Katie MacKendrick, Restoration Ecologist, Long Tom Watershed Council • Jarod Jabousek, Wildlife Biologist, USFWS Partners for Fish and Wildlife Program • Jodi Delevan, Wildlife Biologist, USFWS • Cat Brown, Wildlife Biologist, USFWS • Wes Messinger, Botanist, US Army Corps of Engineers • Bob Altman, American Bird Conservancy • Lawrence Schwabe, Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde Coyote Creek Northeast Management Plan was prepared by: Chris Vogel – WWMP Restoration and Monitoring Biologist Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Fern Ridge Wildlife Area 26969 Cantrell Rd. Eugene, OR 97402 DRAFT Executive Summary ................................................................................................... 6 Introduction and Background ...................................................................... 8 Purpose of the Management Plan ....................................................................... 10 Conservation Values ............................................................................................ 10 ODFW Mission and Authority .............................................................................. 11 Property and Administrative Oversight ............................................................... 11 Willamette Wildlife Mitigation Program ............................................................. 11 Ecological Significance of Coyote Creek Northeast ............................................. 12 Site Description, History and Public Use ..................................................... 13 2.1 Landscape Setting ................................................................................................ 13 Site History ........................................................................................................... 13 2.2.1 Historic Vegetation ................................................................................. 13 2.2.2 Historic and Cultural Land Use ................................................................ 14 2.2.3 Cultural Resources/SHPO Consultation .................................................. 15 Existing Conditions ............................................................................................... 15 2.3.1 Physical Description, Topography and Boundaries ................................ 15 2.3.2 Habitat Types/Land Use/Invasive Vegetation ........................................ 18 2.3.3 Hydrology ................................................................................................ 19 2.3.4 Soils and Geology .................................................................................... 20 2.3.5 Facilities, Roads and Maintenance Access .............................................. 22 2.3.6 Hazardous Waste .................................................................................... 24 2.3.7 Water Rights ........................................................................................... 24 Public Access and Site Use ................................................................................... 25 2.4.1 Public Access, Use and Recreation ......................................................... 25 2.4.2 BPA Conservation Easement ................................................................... 26 2.4.3 Zoning ..................................................................................................... 28 2.4.4 Agricultural Lease ................................................................................... 29 Environmental Setting ......................................................................................... 29 2.4.1 Climate .................................................................................................... 29 Strategy Habitats and Species: Existing Conditions, Threats and Conservation Importance .......................................................................... 29 Strategy Habitats ................................................................................................. 31 3.1.1 Priority Habitats ...................................................................................... 31 Strategy Habitats and Species: Desired Future Conditions and Management Goals and Objectives ........................................................... 36 Priority Habitats ................................................................................................... 37 4.1.1 Wetlands ................................................................................................. 37 4.1.2 Grasslands ............................................................................................... 41 DRAFT Public Access and Use ................................................................................ 42 6 Infrastructure ………………………………….……………………….………………………………45 Management Plan Implementation ........................................................... 43 Prioritization of Restoration and Enhancement Actions ..................................... 44 Projected Restoration Timeline and Activities .................................................... 45 Adaptive Management ........................................................................................ 48 Monitoring ........................................................................................................... 49 7.4.1 Effectiveness Monitoring ........................................................................ 49 7.4.2 Compliance Monitoring .......................................................................... 50 Planning Process and Public Participation ........................................................... 51 Regulatory Requirements .................................................................................... 51 Operations & Management ................................................................................. 51 Management Plan Development and Reporting ................................................. 52 Management Staff Contact Information ............................................................. 53 References Cited ....................................................................................... 54 List of Figures Figure 1. Landscape Setting .......................................................................................................................... 8 Figure 2. Historic Vegetation………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….14 Figure 3. Site Topography ............................................................................................................................................. 16 Figure 4. Coyote Creek Northeast Property Tax Lot Map ........................................................................... 17 Figure 5. Coyote Creek Northeast Field Unit Map ..................................................................................... 18 Figure 6. Coyote Creek Northeast Hydrology Map .................................................................................... 20 Figure 7. Soils Map ..................................................................................................................................... 22 Figure 8. Infrastructure Map ...................................................................................................................... 23 Figure 9. Desired Future Conditions .......................................................................................................... 35 Figure 10. Restoration Phases .................................................................................................................... 46 Figure 11. Monitoring Points ..................................................................................................................... 49 List of Tables Table 1. Coyote Creek Northeast Tax Lots………………………………………………………………………………………..……16 Table 2. Soils of Coyote Creek Northeast, Lane County, Oregon ............................................................... 21 Table 3. Coyote Creek Northeast Easement Restrictions and Management Actions…………..………………….27 Table 4. Priority OCS Strategy Habitats and Species…………………….………………………………………………………. 31 Table 5. Restoration Timeline and Activities……………………………………………………………………………………..…..44 List of Appendices Appendix 1: BPA Conservation Easement Appendix 2: Biodiversity Report Appendix 3: Historical Aerials Appendix 4: Plant and Wildlife Species Inventory Appendix 5: Coyote Creek Northeast
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 'Artificial Intelligence for Plant Identification on Smartphones And
    Artificial Intelligence for plant identification on smartphones and tablets Artificial Intelligence for plant identification on smartphones and tablets HAMLYN JONES n recent years there has been an explosion in the rarely, if at all, identified correctly. For each image availability of apps for smartphones that can be the success of the different apps at identifying to Iused to help with plant identification in the field. family, genus or species is shown. Several of the There are a number of approaches available, ranging sample images were successfully identified to species from those apps that identify plants automatically by all apps, while a few were not identified by any based on the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and app. In practice, I found it very difficult to predict automated Image Recognition, through those that in advance of tests which images were or were not require the user to use traditional dichotomous going to be identified successfully. As an example, keys or multi-access keys, to those that may only the picture of Marsh St John’s-wort (Hypericum elodes) have a range of images without a clear system for apparently had all the requisite features but was identification of any species of interest.All photographs not generally recognised (though interestingly some by the author. more recent repeats of the original tests have led to Here I concentrate only on those free apps that greater success with this image). In contrast, even are available to identify plants automatically from the very ‘messy’ picture of whole plants of Angelica uploaded images, with at most the need for only (Angelica sylvestris) was almost universally identified minor decisions by users (listed in Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants at Fort Ross State Historic Park
    19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450 ■ 707.847.3437 ■ [email protected] ■ www.fortross.org Title: Vascular Plants at Fort Ross State Historic Park Author(s): Dorothy Scherer Published by: California Native Plant Society i Source: Fort Ross Conservancy Library URL: www.fortross.org Fort Ross Conservancy (FRC) asks that you acknowledge FRC as the source of the content; if you use material from FRC online, we request that you link directly to the URL provided. If you use the content offline, we ask that you credit the source as follows: “Courtesy of Fort Ross Conservancy, www.fortross.org.” Fort Ross Conservancy, a 501(c)(3) and California State Park cooperating association, connects people to the history and beauty of Fort Ross and Salt Point State Parks. © Fort Ross Conservancy, 19005 Coast Highway One, Jenner, CA 95450, 707-847-3437 .~ ) VASCULAR PLANTS of FORT ROSS STATE HISTORIC PARK SONOMA COUNTY A PLANT COMMUNITIES PROJECT DOROTHY KING YOUNG CHAPTER CALIFORNIA NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY DOROTHY SCHERER, CHAIRPERSON DECEMBER 30, 1999 ) Vascular Plants of Fort Ross State Historic Park August 18, 2000 Family Botanical Name Common Name Plant Habitat Listed/ Community Comments Ferns & Fern Allies: Azollaceae/Mosquito Fern Azo/la filiculoides Mosquito Fern wp Blechnaceae/Deer Fern Blechnum spicant Deer Fern RV mp,sp Woodwardia fimbriata Giant Chain Fern RV wp Oennstaedtiaceae/Bracken Fern Pleridium aquilinum var. pubescens Bracken, Brake CG,CC,CF mh T Oryopteridaceae/Wood Fern Athyrium filix-femina var. cyclosorum Western lady Fern RV sp,wp Dryopteris arguta Coastal Wood Fern OS op,st Dryopteris expansa Spreading Wood Fern RV sp,wp Polystichum munitum Western Sword Fern CF mh,mp Equisetaceae/Horsetail Equisetum arvense Common Horsetail RV ds,mp Equisetum hyemale ssp.affine Common Scouring Rush RV mp,sg Equisetum laevigatum Smooth Scouring Rush mp,sg Equisetum telmateia ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Analysis of the Giant Genomes of Fritillaria (Liliaceae) Indicates That a Lack of DNA Removal Characterizes Extreme Expansions in Genome Size
    CORE Metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk Provided by Queen Mary Research Online Analysis of the giant genomes of Fritillaria (Liliaceae) indicates that a lack of DNA removal characterizes extreme expansions in genome size. Kelly, LJ; Renny-Byfield, S; Pellicer, J; Macas, J; Novák, P; Neumann, P; Lysak, MA; Day, PD; Berger, M; Fay, MF; Nichols, RA; Leitch, AR; Leitch, IJ © 2015 The Authors. CC-BY For additional information about this publication click this link. http://qmro.qmul.ac.uk/jspui/handle/123456789/8496 Information about this research object was correct at the time of download; we occasionally make corrections to records, please therefore check the published record when citing. For more information contact [email protected] Research Analysis of the giant genomes of Fritillaria (Liliaceae) indicates that a lack of DNA removal characterizes extreme expansions in genome size Laura J. Kelly1,2, Simon Renny-Byfield1,3, Jaume Pellicer2,Jirı Macas4, Petr Novak4, Pavel Neumann4, Martin A. Lysak5, Peter D. Day1,2, Madeleine Berger2,6,7, Michael F. Fay2, Richard A. Nichols1, Andrew R. Leitch1 and Ilia J. Leitch2 1School of Biological and Chemical Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, E1 4NS, UK; 2Jodrell Laboratory, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Richmond, TW9 3DS, UK; 3 4 Department of Plant Sciences, University of California Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA; Biology Centre CAS, Institute of Plant Molecular Biology, CZ-37005, Ceske Budejovice, Czech Republic; 5Plant Cytogenomics Research Group, CEITEC – Central European Institute of Technology, Masaryk University, Kamenice 5, CZ-62500, Brno, Czech Republic; 6School of Biological and Biomedical Sciences, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK; 7Rothamsted Research, West Common, Harpenden, Hertfordshire, AL5 2JQ, UK Summary Authors for correspondence: Plants exhibit an extraordinary range of genome sizes, varying by > 2000-fold between the Laura J.
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Biogeographically Based Population Introduction Protocols for At-Risk Willamette Valley Plant Species
    Developing biogeographically based population introduction protocols for at-risk Willamette Valley plant species: Agrostis howellii (Howell’s bentgrass) Aster curtus (white-topped aster), Aster vialis (wayside aster), Delphinium leucophaeum (hot rock larkspur), Delphinium pavonaceaum (peacock larkspur), Erigeron decumbens var. decumbens (Willamette daisy), Horkelia congesta ssp. congesta (shaggy horkelia), Lomatium bradshawii (Bradshaw’s desert parsley), Lupinus sulphureus ssp. kincaidii (Kincaid’s lupine), Montia howellii (Howell’s montia), Sidalcea spp. (Willamette Valley checkermallows) Prepared by Steven D. Gisler Native Plant Conservation Program Oregon Department of Agriculture with contributions by Oregon Department of Agriculture staff for U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Grant OR-EP-2, segment 13 Acknowledgements: We would like to thank the many people who contributed to the completion of this report. Thanks to Andy Robinson and Kathy Pendergrass (USFWS) for providing funding and encouragement (Grant no. OR-EP-2, segment 13). Kelly Amsberry, Rebecca Currin, and R.J. Meinke contributed to text completion and review, and Melissa Carr provided invaluable assistance in compiling data. Thanks also to the staff, interns and students who provided plant and habitat photos, and to Erin Amsberry Abood for assistance in final report preparation. Contact Information: Robert J. Meinke Kelly Amsberry Native Plant Conservation Program Native Plant Conservation Program Oregon Department of Agriculture Oregon Department of Agriculture Dept. of Botany and Plant Pathology Dept. of Botany and Plant Pathology Oregon State University Oregon State University Corvallis, OR 97331 Corvallis, OR 97331 (541) 737-2317 (541) 737-4333 [email protected] [email protected] Report format: The following species are presented in alphabetical order: Agrostis howellii (Howell’s bentgrass), Aster curtus (white-topped aster), Aster vialis (wayside aster), Delphinium leucophaeum (hot rock larkspur), Delphinium pavonaceaum (peacock larkspur), Erigeron decumbens var.
    [Show full text]
  • State of New York City's Plants 2018
    STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 Daniel Atha & Brian Boom © 2018 The New York Botanical Garden All rights reserved ISBN 978-0-89327-955-4 Center for Conservation Strategy The New York Botanical Garden 2900 Southern Boulevard Bronx, NY 10458 All photos NYBG staff Citation: Atha, D. and B. Boom. 2018. State of New York City’s Plants 2018. Center for Conservation Strategy. The New York Botanical Garden, Bronx, NY. 132 pp. STATE OF NEW YORK CITY’S PLANTS 2018 4 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 INTRODUCTION 10 DOCUMENTING THE CITY’S PLANTS 10 The Flora of New York City 11 Rare Species 14 Focus on Specific Area 16 Botanical Spectacle: Summer Snow 18 CITIZEN SCIENCE 20 THREATS TO THE CITY’S PLANTS 24 NEW YORK STATE PROHIBITED AND REGULATED INVASIVE SPECIES FOUND IN NEW YORK CITY 26 LOOKING AHEAD 27 CONTRIBUTORS AND ACKNOWLEGMENTS 30 LITERATURE CITED 31 APPENDIX Checklist of the Spontaneous Vascular Plants of New York City 32 Ferns and Fern Allies 35 Gymnosperms 36 Nymphaeales and Magnoliids 37 Monocots 67 Dicots 3 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report, State of New York City’s Plants 2018, is the first rankings of rare, threatened, endangered, and extinct species of what is envisioned by the Center for Conservation Strategy known from New York City, and based on this compilation of The New York Botanical Garden as annual updates thirteen percent of the City’s flora is imperiled or extinct in New summarizing the status of the spontaneous plant species of the York City. five boroughs of New York City. This year’s report deals with the City’s vascular plants (ferns and fern allies, gymnosperms, We have begun the process of assessing conservation status and flowering plants), but in the future it is planned to phase in at the local level for all species.
    [Show full text]
  • Environmental Weeds of Coastal Plains and Heathy Forests Bioregions of Victoria Heading in Band
    Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Heading in band b Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Heading in band Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria Contents Introduction 1 Purpose of the list 1 Limitations 1 Relationship to statutory lists 1 Composition of the list and assessment of taxa 2 Categories of environmental weeds 5 Arrangement of the list 5 Column 1: Botanical Name 5 Column 2: Common Name 5 Column 3: Ranking Score 5 Column 4: Listed in the CALP Act 1994 5 Column 5: Victorian Alert Weed 5 Column 6: National Alert Weed 5 Column 7: Weed of National Significance 5 Statistics 5 Further information & feedback 6 Your involvement 6 Links 6 Weed identification texts 6 Citation 6 Acknowledgments 6 Bibliography 6 Census reference 6 Appendix 1 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed alphabetically within risk categories. 7 Appendix 2 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed by botanical name. 19 Appendix 3 Environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria listed by common name. 31 Advisory list of environmental weeds of coastal plains and heathy forests bioregions of Victoria i Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment Melbourne, March2008 © The State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2009 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968.
    [Show full text]
  • DRAFT OAEC NATIVE PLANT LIST FERNS and FERN ALLIES
    DRAFT OAEC NATIVE PLANT LIST FERNS and FERN ALLIES: Blechnaceae: Deer Fern Family Giant Chain Fern Woodwardia fimbriata Dennstaedtiaceae: Bracken Fern Bracken Pteridium aquilinum Dryopteridaceae: Wood Fern Family Lady Fern Athyrium filix-femina Wood Fern Dryopteris argutanitum Western Sword Fern Polystichum muitum Polypodiaceae: Polypody Family California Polypody Polypodium californicum Pteridaceae: Brake Family California Maiden-Hair Adiantum jordanii Coffee Fern Pellaea andromedifolia Goldback Fern Pentagramma triangularis Isotaceae: Quillwort Family Isoetes sp? Nuttallii? Selaginellaceae: Spike-Moss Family Selaginella bigelovii GYMNOPSPERMS Pinaceae: Pine Family Douglas-Fir Psuedotsuga menziesii Taxodiaceae: Bald Cypress Family Redwood Sequoia sempervirens ANGIOSPERMS: DICOTS Aceraceae: Maple Family Big-Leaf Maple Acer macrophyllum Box Elder Acer negundo Anacardiaceae: Sumac Family Western Poison Oak Toxicodendron diversilobum Apiaceae: Carrot Family Lomatium( utriculatum) or (carulifolium)? Pepper Grass Perideridia kelloggii Yampah Perideridia gairdneri Sanicula sp? Sweet Cicely Osmorhiza chilensis Unidentified in forest at barn/deer fence gate Angelica Angelica tomentosa Apocynaceae: Dogbane or Indian Hemp Family Apocynum cannabinum Aristolochiaceae Dutchman’s Pipe, Pipevine Aristolochia californica Wild Ginger Asarum caudatum Asteraceae: Sunflower Family Grand Mountain Dandelion Agoseris grandiflora Broad-leaved Aster Aster radulinus Coyote Brush Baccharis pilularis Pearly Everlasting Anaphalis margaritacea Woodland Tarweed Madia
    [Show full text]
  • Wet Meadow Plant Communities of the Alliance Trifolion Pallidi on the Southeastern Margin of the Pannonian Plain
    water Article Wet Meadow Plant Communities of the Alliance Trifolion pallidi on the Southeastern Margin of the Pannonian Plain Andraž Carniˇ 1,2 , Mirjana Cuk´ 3 , Igor Zelnik 4 , Jozo Franji´c 5, Ružica Igi´c 3 , Miloš Ili´c 3 , Daniel Krstonoši´c 5 , Dragana Vukov 3 and Željko Škvorc 5,* 1 Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts, Institute of Biology, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; [email protected] 2 School for Viticulture and Enology, University of Nova Gorica, 5000 Nova Gorica, Slovenia 3 Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science, University of Novi Sad, 21000 Novi Sad, Serbia; [email protected] (M.C.);´ [email protected] (R.I.); [email protected] (M.I.); [email protected] (D.V.) 4 Department of Biology, Biotechnical Faculty, University of Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia; [email protected] 5 Faculty of Forestry, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia; [email protected] (J.F.); [email protected] (D.K.) * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: The article deals with wet meadow plant communities of the alliance Trifolion pallidi that appear on the periodically inundated or waterlogged sites on the riverside terraces or gentle slopes along watercourses. These plant communities are often endangered by inappropriate hydrological interventions or management practices. All available vegetation plots representing this vegetation type were collected, organized in a database, and numerically elaborated. This vegetation type appears in the southeastern part of the Pannonian Plain, which is still under the influence of the Citation: Carni,ˇ A.; Cuk,´ M.; Zelnik, Mediterranean climate; its southern border is formed by southern outcrops of the Pannonian Plain I.; Franji´c,J.; Igi´c,R.; Ili´c,M.; and its northern border coincides with the influence of the Mediterranean climate (line Slavonsko Krstonoši´c,D.; Vukov, D.; Škvorc, Ž.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary Consequences of Dioecy in Angiosperms: the Effects of Breeding System on Speciation and Extinction Rates
    EVOLUTIONARY CONSEQUENCES OF DIOECY IN ANGIOSPERMS: THE EFFECTS OF BREEDING SYSTEM ON SPECIATION AND EXTINCTION RATES by JANA C. HEILBUTH B.Sc, Simon Fraser University, 1996 A THESIS SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in THE FACULTY OF GRADUATE STUDIES (Department of Zoology) We accept this thesis as conforming to the required standard THE UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA July 2001 © Jana Heilbuth, 2001 Wednesday, April 25, 2001 UBC Special Collections - Thesis Authorisation Form Page: 1 In presenting this thesis in partial fulfilment of the requirements for an advanced degree at the University of British Columbia, I agree that the Library shall make it freely available for reference and study. I further agree that permission for extensive copying of this thesis for scholarly purposes may be granted by the head of my department or by his or her representatives. It is understood that copying or publication of this thesis for financial gain shall not be allowed without my written permission. The University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada http://www.library.ubc.ca/spcoll/thesauth.html ABSTRACT Dioecy, the breeding system with male and female function on separate individuals, may affect the ability of a lineage to avoid extinction or speciate. Dioecy is a rare breeding system among the angiosperms (approximately 6% of all flowering plants) while hermaphroditism (having male and female function present within each flower) is predominant. Dioecious angiosperms may be rare because the transitions to dioecy have been recent or because dioecious angiosperms experience decreased diversification rates (speciation minus extinction) compared to plants with other breeding systems.
    [Show full text]
  • Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY
    Flora of the Carolinas, Virginia, and Georgia, Working Draft of 17 March 2004 -- BIBLIOGRAPHY BIBLIOGRAPHY Ackerfield, J., and J. Wen. 2002. A morphometric analysis of Hedera L. (the ivy genus, Araliaceae) and its taxonomic implications. Adansonia 24: 197-212. Adams, P. 1961. Observations on the Sagittaria subulata complex. Rhodora 63: 247-265. Adams, R.M. II, and W.J. Dress. 1982. Nodding Lilium species of eastern North America (Liliaceae). Baileya 21: 165-188. Adams, R.P. 1986. Geographic variation in Juniperus silicicola and J. virginiana of the Southeastern United States: multivariant analyses of morphology and terpenoids. Taxon 35: 31-75. ------. 1995. Revisionary study of Caribbean species of Juniperus (Cupressaceae). Phytologia 78: 134-150. ------, and T. Demeke. 1993. Systematic relationships in Juniperus based on random amplified polymorphic DNAs (RAPDs). Taxon 42: 553-571. Adams, W.P. 1957. A revision of the genus Ascyrum (Hypericaceae). Rhodora 59: 73-95. ------. 1962. Studies in the Guttiferae. I. A synopsis of Hypericum section Myriandra. Contr. Gray Herbarium Harv. 182: 1-51. ------, and N.K.B. Robson. 1961. A re-evaluation of the generic status of Ascyrum and Crookea (Guttiferae). Rhodora 63: 10-16. Adams, W.P. 1973. Clusiaceae of the southeastern United States. J. Elisha Mitchell Sci. Soc. 89: 62-71. Adler, L. 1999. Polygonum perfoliatum (mile-a-minute weed). Chinquapin 7: 4. Aedo, C., J.J. Aldasoro, and C. Navarro. 1998. Taxonomic revision of Geranium sections Batrachioidea and Divaricata (Geraniaceae). Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 85: 594-630. Affolter, J.M. 1985. A monograph of the genus Lilaeopsis (Umbelliferae). Systematic Bot. Monographs 6. Ahles, H.E., and A.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Sexton Mountain Mariposa Lily (Calochortus Indecorus)
    Sexton Mountain mariposa lily (Calochortus indecorus) ENDANGERED (possibly extinct) Close-up of the flowers and fruit of the Sexton Mountain mariposa lily (left) and the entire plants, including bulbs (right), from the holotype herbarium specimen of the species, courtesy of the OSU Herbarium. Family Liliaceae Plant description Calochortus indecorus (Sexton Mountain mariposa lily) is a bulbous perennial with a stout stem and a single basal leaf 2-2.5 dm long. The 2-2.5 cm bulb is ovoid, with a thick, dark coat. Flowers are bright lavender, with hairs in only a small area at the base of the petals above the gland. The two to four flowers are arranged in one or two loose umbels. Sepals are broadly lance-shaped, slightly shorter than the petals, and lack distinctive coloring. The 1.5-2 cm seed capsule is nodding at maturity. Distinguishing characteristics Calochortus uniflorus (meadow mariposa lily) is similar to C. indecorus, but this more common pink-flowered species produces bulblets at the base of the leaves, and has a shorter stem (2-5 cm high below the inflorescence) than the "rather stout" 8-12 cm stem (below the inflorescence) of the rare species. Several other mariposa lilies found in southwest Oregon are also similar in appearance to C. indecorus, but each has distinct differences. The flowers of Calochortus howellii (Howell’s mariposa lily) are white; those of C. tolmiei (cat’s ear mariposa lily) are also whitish, though often with a purple tinge, and have distinctly hairy petals. Calochortus nudus (naked mariposa lily), a mainly Californian species of wet meadows, is superficially similar to C.
    [Show full text]
  • Native Herbaceous Plants in Our Gardens
    Native Herbaceous Plants in Our Gardens A Guide for the Willamette Valley Native Gardening Awareness Program A Committee of the Emerald Chapter of the Native Plant Society of Oregon Members of the Native Gardening Awareness Program, a committee of the Emerald chapter of the NPSO, contributed text, editing, and photographs for this publication. They include: Mieko Aoki, John Coggins, Phyllis Fisher, Rachel Foster, Evelyn Hess, Heiko Koester, Cynthia Lafferty, Danna Lytjen, Bruce Newhouse, Nick Otting, and Michael Robert Spring 2005 1 2 Table of Contents Native Herbaceous Plants in Our Gardens ...........................5 Shady Woodlands .................................................................7 Baneberry – Actaea rubra ................................................... 7 Broad-leaved Bluebells – Mertensia platyphylla .....................7 Hound’s-tongue – Cynoglossum grande ............................... 8 Broad-leaved Starflower –Trientalis latifolia ..........................8 Bunchberry – Cornus unalaschkensis (formerly C. canadensis) ....8 False Solomon’s-seal – Maianthemum racemosum ................ 9 Fawn Lily – Erythronium oregonum .........................................9 Ferns ..........................................................................10-12 Fringecup – Tellima grandiflora and T. odorata ..................... 12 Inside-out Flower – Vancouveria hexandra ....................... 13 Large-leaved Avens – Geum macrophyllum ...................... 13 Meadowrue – Thalictrum spp. ...............................................14
    [Show full text]