DOCSLIB.ORG

National Institute for Subatomic Physics Annual Report 2014

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
National Institute for Subatomic Physics Annual Report 2014 Annual Report 2014 Nikhef National Institute for Subatomic Physics Annual Report 2014 National Institute for Subatomic Physics Nikhef Colophon Nikhef Nationaal instituut voor subatomaire fysica National Institute for Subatomic Physics Visiting address Post address Science Park 105 P.O. Box 41882 1098 XG Amsterdam 1009 DB Amsterdam The Netherlands The Netherlands Telephone: +31 (0)20 592 2000 Fax: +31 (0)20 592 5155 E-mail: [email protected] URL: http://www.nikhef.nl Science communication Contact: Vanessa Mexner Telephone: +31 (0)20 592 5075 E-mail: [email protected] Editors: Stan Bentvelsen, Wouter Hulsbergen, Kees Huyser, Louk Lapikás, Frank Linde, Melissa van der Sande Layout: Kees Huyser Printer: Gildeprint Drukkerijen, Enschede Photos: Kees Huyser, Stan Bentvelsen, Jan Koopstra, Marco Kraan, Arne de Laat, Hanne Nijhuis, CERN Front cover: First full KM3NeT string of 18 optical modules assembled at Nikhef. Deployment in the Mediterranean Sea follows early 2015. Back cover: The Standard Model of particles since the discovery of the Higgs boson. Nikhef is the National Institute for Subatomic Physics in the Netherlands, in which the Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter, the University of Amsterdam, VU University Amsterdam, Radboud University Nijmegen and Utrecht University collaborate. Nikhef coordinates and supports most activities in experimental particle and astroparticle physics in the Netherlands. Nikhef participates in experiments at the Large Hadron Collider at CERN, notably ATLAS, LHCb and ALICE. Astroparticle physics activities at Nikhef are fourfold: the ANTARES and KM3NeT neutrino telescope projects in the Mediterranean Sea; the Pierre Auger Observatory for cosmic rays, located in Argentina; gravitational-wave detection via the Virgo interferometer in Italy, and the projects eLISA and Einstein Telescope; and the direct search for Dark Matter with the XENON detector in the Gran Sasso underground laboratory in Italy. Detector R&D, design and construction take place at the laboratory located at Science Park Amsterdam as well as at the participating universities. Data analysis makes extensive use of large-scale computing at the Tier-1 grid facility operated jointly by Nikhef and SURFsara. Nikhef has a theory group with both its own research programme and close contacts with the experimental groups. 2 Nikhef Annual Report 2014 Contents Introduction ....................................................................................................................................................................................... 4 Reviews ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 7 1.1 “It’s a great privilege to work at Nikhef. No company will allow you to hunt the Higgs particle for decades.” ........................8 1.2 “Whatever we discover in the next decade, it will be something completely new.” ......................................................................11 1.3 CERN – A modern European centre of excellence is turning 60 .....................................................................................................14 1.4 Big Data: Wat en Hoe? ..............................................................................................................................................................................19 Research ............................................................................................................................................................................................ 25 2.1 ATLAS – Harvesting LHC Run 1 ..........................................................................................................................................................26 2.2 LHCb – Probing physics beyond the Standard Model .......................................................................................................................29 2.3 ALICE – Relativistic Heavy-Ion Physics ..............................................................................................................................................31 2.4 Neutrino Telescopes – ANTARES & KM3NeT ................................................................................................................................33 2.5 Gravitational Waves – The dynamics of spacetime .............................................................................................................................35 2.6 Cosmic Rays – Pierre Auger Observatory ............................................................................................................................................37 2.7 Dark Matter – Dark Matter Experiments ..............................................................................................................................................39 2.8 Theoretical Physics ....................................................................................................................................................................................41 2.9 Detector Research & Development .......................................................................................................................................................43 2.10 Grid Computing – Physics Data Processing and ICT infrastructure ..............................................................................................46 Output ............................................................................................................................................................................................... 49 3.1 Publications ................................................................................................................................................................................................50 3.2 Theses ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................60 3.3 Talks .............................................................................................................................................................................................................63 3.4 Posters .........................................................................................................................................................................................................68 3.5 Jamboree .....................................................................................................................................................................................................69 3.6 Awards & Grants .......................................................................................................................................................................................70 Nikhef & Society ............................................................................................................................................................................... 71 4.1 Outreach & Communication ..................................................................................................................................................................72 4.2 Education ....................................................................................................................................................................................................75 4.3 Knowledge Transfer – Valorisation & Spin-off Activities ..................................................................................................................77 4.4 Memberships ..............................................................................................................................................................................................79 4.5 Outreach Talks ..........................................................................................................................................................................................82 Resources .......................................................................................................................................................................................... 83 5.1 Organigram ................................................................................................................................................................................................84 5.2 Organisation ...............................................................................................................................................................................................85 5.3 Funding & Expenses .................................................................................................................................................................................86 5.4 Grants ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................87 5.5 Personnel ....................................................................................................................................................................................................89 5.6 Master Students .........................................................................................................................................................................................93
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Can We Learn from Shape Dynamics? International Loop Quantum Gravity Seminar
    What can we learn from shape dynamics? International Loop Quantum Gravity Seminar Tim A. Koslowski University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada November 12, 2013 Tim A. Koslowski (UNB) What can we learn from shape dynamics? November 12, 2013 1 / 19 Outline 1 Motivation from 2+1 diemsnional qunatum gravity to consider conformal evolution as fundamental 2 Conformal evolution is different from spacetime (i.e. abandon spacetime) 3 Generic dynamical emergence of spacetime in the presence of matter (i.e. regain spacetime) Tim A. Koslowski (UNB) What can we learn from shape dynamics? November 12, 2013 2 / 19 Introduction and Motivation Tim A. Koslowski (UNB) What can we learn from shape dynamics? November 12, 2013 3 / 19 Motivation Canonical metric path integral in 2+1 (only known metric path integral) ab p necessary: 2+1 split and CMC gauge condition gabπ − t g = 0 R 2 ab R ab a pπ c i dtd x(_gabπ −S(N)−H(ξ)) Z = [dgab][dπ ][dN][dξ ]δ[ g − t]δ[F ] det[FP ]e R 2 A R A i dtd x(_τAp −Vo(τ;p;t)) = [dτA][dp ]e [Carlip: CQG 12 (1995) 2201, Seriu PRD 55 (1997) 781] where: τA are Teichm¨ullerparameters, Vo(τ; p; t) denotes on-shell volume, which depends explicitly on time t ) QM on Teichm¨ullerspace, phys. Hamilt. Vo(τ; p; t) [Moncrief: JMP 30 (1989) 2907] Fradkin-Vilkovisky theorem: [cf. Henneaux/Teitelboim: \Quantization of Gauge Systems"] \Partition function depends on gauge fixing cond. only through the gauge equivalence class of gauge fixing conditions." for a discussion and some examples of non-equivalence [see Govaerts, Scholtz: J.Phys.
    [Show full text]
  • Shape Dynamics
    Shape Dynamics Tim A. Koslowski Abstract Barbour’s formulation of Mach’s principle requires a theory of gravity to implement local relativity of clocks, local relativity of rods and spatial covariance. It turns out that relativity of clocks and rods are mutually exclusive. General Relativity implements local relativity of clocks and spatial covariance, but not local relativity of rods. It is the purpose of this contribution to show how Shape Dynamics, a theory that is locally equivalent to General Relativity, implements local relativity of rods and spatial covariance and how a BRST formulation, which I call Doubly General Relativity, implements all of Barbour’s principles. 1 Introduction A reflection on Mach’s principle lead Barbour to postulate that rods and spatial frames of reference should be locally determined by a procedure that he calls “best matching,” while clocks should be locally determined by what he calls “objective change.” (For more, see [1].) More concretely, Barbour’s principles postulate lo- cal time reparametrization invariance, local spatial conformal invariance and spatial covariance. The best matching algorithm for spatial covariance and local spatial conformal invariance turns out to be equivalent to the imposition of linear diffeo- morphism and conformal constraints Z Z 3 ab 3 H(x) = d xp (Lx g)ab; C(r) = d xr p; (1) S S Tim A. Koslowski Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics, 31 Caroline St. N, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada New address: Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New Brunswick Fredericton, New Brunswick E3B 5A3, Canada e-mail: [email protected] 1 2 Tim A.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical and Chemical Sciences 2010-2015 Utrecht University
    RESEARCH REVIEW PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL SCIENCES 2010-2015 UTRECHT UNIVERSITY Quality Assurance Netherlands Universities (QANU) Catharijnesingel 56 PO Box 8035 3503 RA Utrecht The Netherlands Phone: +31 (0) 30 230 3100 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.qanu.nl Project number: 0630 © 2017 QANU Text and numerical material from this publication may be reproduced in print, by photocopying or by any other means with the permission of QANU if the source is mentioned. 2 QANU / Research Review Physical and Chemical Sciences, Utrecht University REPORT ON THE RESEARCH REVIEW OF PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL SCIENCES OF UTRECHT UNIVERSITY CONTENT 1. Foreword committee chair 5 2. The review committee and the procedures 7 2.1 Scope of the review 7 2.2 Composition of the committee 7 2.3 Independence 7 2.4 Data provided to the committee 7 2.5 Procedures followed by the committee 8 3. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of Physical and Chemical Sciences 9 3.1 Broader context 9 3.2 Research quality 10 3.3 Relevance to Society 11 3.4 Viability 13 3.5 PhD programmes 15 3.6 Research integrity policy 17 3.7 Diversity 18 3.8 Conclusion 19 3.9 Quantitative assessment of Physical and Chemical Sciences 20 4. Quantitative and qualitative assessment of the separate research institutes 21 4.1 Debye Institute for Nanomaterial Science 21 4.2 Institute for Marine and Atmospheric research 24 4.3 Institute for Theoretical Physics 27 4.4 Institute for Sub-Atomic Physics 30 5. Recommendations 33 Appendices 35 Appendix 1: Explanation of the SEP criteria and categories 37 Appendix 2: Curricula Vitae of the committee members 39 Appendix 3: Programme of the site visit 41 Appendix 4: Quantitative Data 47 QANU / Research Review Physical and Chemical Sciences, Utrecht University 3 4 QANU / Research Review Physical and Chemical Sciences, Utrecht University 1.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Axioms of Causal Set Theory
    On the Axioms of Causal Set Theory Benjamin F. Dribus Louisiana State University [email protected] November 8, 2013 Abstract Causal set theory is a promising attempt to model fundamental spacetime structure in a discrete order-theoretic context via sets equipped with special binary relations, called causal sets. The el- ements of a causal set are taken to represent spacetime events, while its binary relation is taken to encode causal relations between pairs of events. Causal set theory was introduced in 1987 by Bombelli, Lee, Meyer, and Sorkin, motivated by results of Hawking and Malament relating the causal, conformal, and metric structures of relativistic spacetime, together with earlier work on discrete causal theory by Finkelstein, Myrheim, and 't Hooft. Sorkin has coined the phrase, \order plus number equals geometry," to summarize the causal set viewpoint regarding the roles of causal structure and discreteness in the emergence of spacetime geometry. This phrase represents a specific version of what I refer to as the causal metric hypothesis, which is the idea that the properties of the physical universe, and in particular, the metric properties of classical spacetime, arise from causal structure at the fundamental scale. Causal set theory may be expressed in terms of six axioms: the binary axiom, the measure axiom, countability, transitivity, interval finiteness, and irreflexivity. The first three axioms, which fix the physical interpretation of a causal set, and restrict its \size," appear in the literature either implic- itly, or as part of the preliminary definition of a causal set. The last three axioms, which encode the essential mathematical structure of a causal set, appear in the literature as the irreflexive formula- tion of causal set theory.
    [Show full text]
  • Seismic Characterization of the Euregio Meuse-Rhine in View of Einstein Telescope
    SEISMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE EUREGIO MEUSE-RHINE IN VIEW OF EINSTEIN TELESCOPE 13 September 2019 First results of seismic studies of the Belgian-Dutch-German site for Einstein Telescope Soumen Koley1, Maria Bader1, Alessandro Bertolini1, Jo van den Brand1,2, Henk Jan Bulten1,3, Stefan Hild1,2, Frank Linde1,4, Bas Swinkels1, Bjorn Vink5 1. Nikhef, National Institute for Subatomic Physics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 2. Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands 3. VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 4. University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands 5. Antea Group, Maastricht, The Netherlands CONFIDENTIAL Figure 1: Artist impression of the Einstein Telescope gravitational wave observatory situated at a depth of 200-300 meters in the Euregio Meuse-Rhine landscape. The triangular topology with 10 kilometers long arms allows for the installation of multiple so-called laser interferometers. Each of which can detect ripples in the fabric of space-time – the unique signature of a gravitational wave – as minute relative movements of the mirrors hanging at the bottom of the red and white towers indicated in the illustration at the corners of the triangle. 1 SEISMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE EUREGIO MEUSE-RHINE IN VIEW OF EINSTEIN TELESCOPE Figure 2: Drill rig for the 2018-2019 campaign used for the completion of the 260 meters deep borehole near Terziet on the Dutch-Belgian border in South Limburg. Two broadband seismic sensors were installed: one at a depth of 250 meters and one just below the surface. Both sensors are accessible via the KNMI portal: http://rdsa.knmi.nl/dataportal/. 2 SEISMIC CHARACTERIZATION OF THE EUREGIO MEUSE-RHINE IN VIEW OF EINSTEIN TELESCOPE Executive summary The European 2011 Conceptual Design Report for Einstein Telescope identified the Euregio Meuse-Rhine and in particular the South Limburg border region as one of the prospective sites for this next generation gravitational wave observatory.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2013 NARODOWE CENTRUM BADAŃ JĄDROWYCH NATIONAL CENTRE for NUCLEAR RESEARCH
    Annual Report 2013 NARODOWE CENTRUM BADAŃ JĄDROWYCH NATIONAL CENTRE FOR NUCLEAR RESEARCH ANNUAL REPORT 2013 PL-05-400 Otwock-Świerk, POLAND tel.: 048 22 718 00 01 fax: 048 22 779 34 81 e-mail: [email protected] http://www.ncbj.gov.pl Editors: N. Keeley K. Kurek Cover design: S. Mirski Secretarial work and layout: G. Swiboda ISSN 2299-2960 Annual Report 2013 3 CONTENTS FOREWORD ............................................................................................................................................................ 5 I. GENERAL INFORMATION ................................................................................................... 7 1. LOCATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 7 2. MANAGEMENT OF THE INSTITUTE ............................................................................ 7 3. SCIENTIFIC COUNCIL ..................................................................................................... 8 4. MAIN RESEARCH ACTIVITIES ................................................................................... 11 5. SCIENTIFIC STAFF OF THE INSTITUTE .................................................................... 13 6. VISITING SCIENTISTS .................................................................................................. 15 7. PARTICIPATION IN NATIONAL CONSORTIA AND SCIENTIFIC NETWORKS .. 23 8. DEGREES ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Does Time Differ from Change? Philosophical Appraisal of the Problem of Time in Quantum Gravity and in Physics
    Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 52 (2015) 48–54 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/shpsb Does time differ from change? Philosophical appraisal of the problem of time in quantum gravity and in physics Alexis de Saint-Ours Université Paris Diderot – CNRS, Laboratoire SPHERE, UMR 7219, Bâtiment Condorcet, case 7093, 5 rue Thomas Mann, 75205 Paris cedex 13, France article info abstract Article history: After reviewing the problem of time in Quantum Gravity, I compare from a philosophical perspective, Received 16 December 2013 both Carlo Rovelli's and Julian Barbour's (before Shape Dynamics) understanding of time in Quantum Received in revised form Gravity and in dynamics in general, trying to show that those two relational understandings of time 10 March 2015 differ. Rovelli argues that there is change without time and that time can be abstracted from any change Accepted 15 March 2015 whereas Barbour claims that some motions are better than others for constituting duration standards Available online 27 October 2015 To my father and that time is to be abstracted from all change in the universe. I conclude by a few remarks on Bergson's criticism of physics in the light of those debates trying to show that both Rovelli and Barbour Keywords: give surrationalist (as Bachelard understood it) answers to the critique of spatialized time in Physics. Time & 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. Change Barbour Rovelli Bergson Lautman When citing this paper, please use the full journal title Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 1.
    [Show full text]
  • What Is Time in Some Modern Physics Theories: Interpretation Problems
    Ivan A. Karpenko WHAT IS TIME IN SOME MODERN PHYSICS THEORIES: INTERPRETATION PROBLEMS BASIC RESEARCH PROGRAM WORKING PAPERS SERIES: HUMANITIES WP BRP 124/HUM/2016 This Working Paper is an output of a research project implemented at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE). Any opinions or claims contained in this Working Paper do not necessarily reflect the views of HSE. Ivan A. Karpenko1 WHAT IS TIME IN SOME MODERN PHYSICS THEORIES: INTERPRETATION PROBLEMS2 The article deals with the problem of time in the context of several theories of modern physics. This fundamental concept inevitably arises in physical theories, but so far there is no adequate description of it in the philosophy of science. In the theory of relativity, quantum field theory, Standard Model of particle physics, theory of loop quantum gravity, superstring theory and other most recent theories the idea of time is shown explicitly or not. Sometimes, such as in the special theory of relativity, it plays a significant role and sometimes it does not. But anyway it exists and is implied by the content of the theory, which in some cases directly includes its mathematical tools. Fundamental difference of space-time processes in microcosm and macrocosm is of particular importance for solving the problem. In this regard, a need to understand the time in the way it appears in modern physics, to describe it in the language of philosophy arises (satisfactory for time description mathematical tools also do not exist). This will give an opportunity to get closer to the answer on question of time characteristics.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Gravity Past, Present and Future
    Quantum Gravity past, present and future carlo rovelli vancouver 2017 loop quantum gravity, Many directions of investigation string theory, Hořava–Lifshitz theory, supergravity, Vastly different numbers of researchers involved asymptotic safety, AdS-CFT-like dualities A few offer rather complete twistor theory, tentative theories of quantum gravity causal set theory, entropic gravity, Most are highly incomplete emergent gravity, non-commutative geometry, Several are related, boundaries are fluid group field theory, Penrose nonlinear quantum dynamics causal dynamical triangulations, Several are only vaguely connected to the actual problem of quantum gravity shape dynamics, ’t Hooft theory non-quantization of geometry Many offer useful insights … loop quantum causal dynamical gravity triangulations string theory asymptotic Hořava–Lifshitz safety group field AdS-CFT theory dualities twistor theory shape dynamics causal set supergravity theory Penrose nonlinear quantum dynamics non-commutative geometry Violation of QM non-quantized geometry entropic ’t Hooft emergent gravity theory gravity Several are related Herman Verlinde at LOOP17 in Warsaw No major physical assumptions over GR&QM No infinity in the small loop quantum causal dynamical Infinity gravity triangulations in the small Supersymmetry string High dimensions theory Strings Lorentz Violation asymptotic Hořava–Lifshitz safety group field AdS-CFT theory dualities twistor theory Mostly still shape dynamics causal set classical supergravity theory Penrose nonlinear quantum dynamics non-commutative geometry Violation of QM non-quantized geometry entropic ’t Hooft emergent gravity theory gravity Discriminatory questions: Is Lorentz symmetry violated at the Planck scale or not? Are there supersymmetric particles or not? Is Quantum Mechanics violated in the presence of gravity or not? Are there physical degrees of freedom at any arbitrary small scale or not? Is geometry discrete i the small? Lorentz violations Infinite d.o.f.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Gravity in Timeless Configuration Space
    Quantum gravity in timeless configuration space Henrique Gomes∗ Perimeter Institute for Theoretical Physics 31 Caroline Street, ON, N2L 2Y5, Canada June 30, 2017 Abstract On the path towards quantum gravity we find friction between temporal relations in quantum mechanics (QM) (where they are fixed and field-independent), and in general relativity (where they are field-dependent and dynamic). This paper aims to attenuate that friction, by encoding gravity in the timeless configuration space of spatial fields with dynamics given by a path integral. The framework demands that boundary condi- tions for this path integral be uniquely given, but unlike other approaches where they are prescribed — such as the no-boundary and the tunneling proposals — here I postulate basic principles to identify boundary con- ditions in a large class of theories. Uniqueness arises only if a reduced configuration space can be defined and if it has a profoundly asymmetric fundamental structure. These requirements place strong restrictions on the field and symmetry content of theories encompassed here; shape dynamics is one such theory. When these constraints are met, any emerging theory will have a Born rule given merely by a particular volume element built from the path integral in (reduced) configuration space. Also as in other boundary proposals, Time, including space-time, emerges as an effective concept; valid for certain curves in configuration space but not assumed from the start. When some such notion of time becomes available, conservation of (posi- tive) probability currents ensues. I show that, in the appropriate limits, a Schroedinger equation dictates the evolution of weakly coupled source fields on a classical gravitational background.
    [Show full text]
  • Letter of Interest Fundamental Physics with Gravitational Wave Detectors
    Snowmass2021 - Letter of Interest Fundamental physics with gravitational wave detectors Thematic Areas: (check all that apply /) (CF1) Dark Matter: Particle Like (CF2) Dark Matter: Wavelike (CF3) Dark Matter: Cosmic Probes (CF4) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: The Modern Universe (CF5) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: Cosmic Dawn and Before (CF6) Dark Energy and Cosmic Acceleration: Complementarity of Probes and New Facilities (CF7) Cosmic Probes of Fundamental Physics (TF09) Cosmology Theory (TF10) Quantum Information Science Theory Contact Information: Emanuele Berti (Johns Hopkins University) [[email protected]], Vitor Cardoso (Instituto Superior Tecnico,´ Lisbon) [[email protected]], Bangalore Sathyaprakash (Pennsylvania State University & Cardiff University) [[email protected]], Nicolas´ Yunes (University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign) [[email protected]] Authors: (see long author lists after the text) Abstract: (maximum 200 words) Gravitational wave detectors are formidable tools to explore black holes and neutron stars. These com- pact objects are extraordinarily efficient at producing electromagnetic and gravitational radiation. As such, they are ideal laboratories for fundamental physics and they have an immense discovery potential. The detection of merging black holes by third-generation Earth-based detectors and space-based detectors will provide exquisite tests of general relativity. Loud “golden” events and extreme mass-ratio inspirals can strengthen the observational evidence for horizons by mapping the exterior spacetime geometry, inform us on possible near-horizon modifications, and perhaps reveal a breakdown of Einstein’s gravity. Measure- ments of the black-hole spin distribution and continuous gravitational-wave searches can turn black holes into efficient detectors of ultralight bosons across ten or more orders of magnitude in mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Annual Report 2001
    2001 NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR NUCLEAR PHYSICS AND HIGH-ENERGY PHYSICS ANNUAL REPORT 2001 Kruislaan 409, 1098 SJ Amsterdam P.O. Box 41882, 1009 DB Amsterdam Colofon Publication edited for NIKHEF: Address: Postbus 41882, 1009 DB Amsterdam Kruislaan 409, 1098 SJ Amsterdam Phone: +31 20 592 2000 Fax: +31 20 592 5155 E-mail: [email protected] Editors: Louk Lapik´as & Marcel Vreeswijk Layout & art-work: Kees Huyser Organisation: Anja van Dulmen Cover Photograph: A 3-D drawing of the LHCb Vertex detector URL: http://www.nikhef.nl The National Institute for Nuclear Physics and High-Energy Physics (NIKHEF) is a joint venture of the Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie (FOM), the Universiteit van Amsterdam (UVA), the Katholieke Universiteit Nijmegen (KUN), the Vrije Univer- siteit Amsterdam (VUA) and the Universiteit Utrecht (UU). The NIKHEF laboratory is located at the Science and Technology Centre Watergraafsmeer (WCW) in Amsterdam. The activities in experimental subatomic physics are coordinated and supported by NIKHEF with locations at Amsterdam, Nijmegen and Utrecht. The scientific programme is carried out by FOM, UVA, KUN,VUAandUUstaff.Experimentsaredone at the European accelerator centre CERN in Geneva, where NIKHEF participates in two LEP experiments (L3andDELPHI),inaneutrino experiment (CHORUS) and in SPS heavy ion experiments (NA57 and NA49). NIKHEF participates in the Tevatron experiment D0 at Fermilab, Chicago. At DESY in Hamburg NIKHEF participates in the ZEUS, HERMES and HERA-B experiments. Research and development activities are in progress for the future experiments ATLAS, ALICE and LHCb with the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) at CERN. NIKHEF is closely cooperating with the University of Twente.
    [Show full text]