Wafra Area-Kuwait

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Wafra Area-Kuwait Biodiversity Journal , 2012, 3 (3): 179-188 Biodiversity and conservation of Wildlife at the Wafra area in Kuwait Hanan Al-Khalifa 1* , Afaf Al-Nasser 1, Mohammad Safar Abbas 2 & Jamal Dashti 1 1Kuwait Institute for Scientific Research, P.O. Box 24885, 13109 Safat, Kuwait; email: [email protected] 2Joint Operation (JO)-Wafra, Kuwait Oil Company, Kuwait *Corresponding author ABSTRACT In response to the increasing needs to conserve wildlife and to enhance biodiversity, the Joint Operations-Wafra (JO-Wafra) protected their natural environment by fencing and de - dicating areas for conservation of biological diversity. The main objective of this study is to conduct a wildlife baseline assessment in the oilfields of JO-Wafra and to identify po - tential habitats of endangered or threatened species that could occur on site. The wildlife survey covered the winter and early spring seasons. Although short and insufficient to pro - vide a detailed assessment, the field data collected indicated significant differences in the number of individuals and wildlife fauna species within the fenced and unfenced oilfields. It also showed that the fenced JO-Wafra has rich and diverse wildlife fauna species, an in - dication of ecological health. In addition to JO-Wafra oilfield, it is recommended to protect the South Umm Guddair (SUG) oilfields from livestock grazing and wildlife hunters. The protected area could, therefore, increase wildlife habitats and might harbor some endan - gered wildlife species. It is also recommended to connect the two oilfields with native shrubs and trees planted along the road, to serve as “green corridor”, shelter and additional source of food for the animals of both oilfields. KEY WORDS Endangered wildlife; Oil fields; Wildlife fauna; Wildlife habitat; Wildlife monitoring. Received 07.06.2012; accepted 02.08.2012; printed 30.09.2012 INTRODUCTION freely under natural conditions) is estimated to range from 5 million to 100 million globally; Biological diversity refers to the variety of life though less than 1.7 million have actually been de - forms including the genes they contain, and the eco - scribed (BUDEST, 1993; FEPA, 2003; Maffi, 2005; systems they form. Sarkar, 2006). There are three different levels of biodiversity: Biodiversity conservation is of a major impor - genetic diversity which refers to the variety of ge - tance internationally because humans derive their netic material contained in all the individuals, spe - food, medicines and industrial products from bio - cies diversity which refers to the variety of living logical diversity of the wild and its domesticated species and ecosystem diversity which refers to the components. It also gives future generations the op - variety of habitats and ecological processes. In portunity to enjoy nature. In addition, biodiversity other words, it is reflected by the variety of all is important for the recycling of essential elements, forms of life on earth, which provides the building such as carbon, oxygen, and nitrogen. blocks for human existence. It is also responsible for mitigating pollution, The total number of species (defined as a popu - protecting watersheds and combating soil erosion; lation of organisms which are able to interbreed accordingly, experiencing and increasing our kno - 180 H. A l-K HAlifA , A. A l-N ASSer , M.S. A bbAS & J. D ASHti wledge about biodiversity transforms our values In 1938-1940, oil was discovered from the Al- and beliefs (McGregor, 1994; FEPA, 2003; Boro - Burgan area, near PNZ. In 1948, a 60 year conces - kini et al., 2010). sion was granted by the Kuwait government to the The state of Kuwait covers an area of about Aminoil, a small group of oil companies to ex - 17600 Km 2 at the north-eastern corner of the Ara - plore and exploit the Kuwait side of the PNZ. Si - bian peninsula, between 28° 30’ N and 30° 05’ N in milarly in 1949, the Getty Oil Company (formerly latitude and between 46 o 33’ E and 48 o 35’ E longi - Pacific Western Oil Corporation) gained grants tude. Kuwait's environment is characterized by from the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA) to ex - scarcity of rainfall (100 mm/yr) and extreme tem - plore the PNZ (KSA side). perature variations throughout the year. The Joint Operations (JO) was born in 1960 The summer temperature is very hot (over 40- when the two oil companies formed a joint commit - 50 oC), while the winter is cool to mild with a mean tee to oversee and supervise their operations with temperature of 12.7 oC. The water resources are the resultant productions divided equally to both very limited in Kuwait. There is no fresh surface parties: the Kuwait Oil Company (KOC), which water supply and very limited renewable groun - operates the Kuwaiti concession and the Texaco In - dwater. The adverse climate conditions of the state corporated, Saudi Arabian Texaco (SAT) that ope - of Kuwait affected its biological diversity and en - rates the Saudi Arabian concession. vironmental ecosystems (Omar et al., 2001). The The 3,600 Km 2 partitioned neutral zone oil - desert of Kuwait has long been known as an im - fields were not spared during the Iraqi invasion of portant source of food, livestock grazing and wil - Kuwait in 1990. The oil wells were destroyed and dlife hunting. Desert plants were used for fuel and burned contributing to the environmental catastro - medication purposes. phe man had ever known. In 1999-2002, the peri - Urbanization, rapid increase in population, over - meter fence around the JO-Wafra main oilfield was grazing, recreation usage, environmental factors, constructed to prevent livestock grazing and wil - and destruction due to Iraqi invasion in 1990 are dlife hunters from the area. main contributing factors to the ecological degra - This resulted to the gradual rehabilitation of the dation of the country (McGregor, 1994; Omar, flora and fauna in the oilfield. Literature on the 2000; Selby, 2005). Biodiversity conservation has wildlife fauna of the Wafra area is very limited. become one of the challenging priorities for many Example is the “Insect Fauna of Kuwait” by Al- countries, including the state of Kuwait, to combat Houty (1989), when some insect samples were species extinction. The State of Kuwait ratified the collected in the Wafra area. International Convention on Biodiversity and the An environmental impact review prepared by National Strategy for Biodiversity Conservation Chichester (2000) described the fauna of the was adopted in order to conserve and enhance bio - upland deserts and sabkha of the Partitioned Neu - logical diversity in the country. Numerous wildlife tral Zone (PNZ) as “Over 220 species of birds research studies were conducted in the State of Ku - have been observed in the PNZ in recent years… wait. From all these studies, information on flora fauna of the upland deserts and sabkha includes and fauna of Kuwait has been collected. common insects; ants and beetles; lizards and sna - A list of desert animals has been prepared. Also, kes; such as Sand Boa, Rat Snake, Blue-throated threatened desert animals and those to be extinct Agamid, Desert Monitor, and Dhub. Small, noc - were identified such as Houbara Bustard ( Chlamy - turnal mammals include Jerboa, Jirds, Desert Fox, dotis undulata macquennii ), Desert Monitor ( Vara - and Long-eared Hedgehog”. nus griseus ), Ostrich ( Struthio camelus ) and The current study involves fauna baseline asses - Arabian Oryx ( Oryx leucoryx ) (KISR., 1999; De - sment within the JO-Wafra territories with the fol - lima et al., 2005; Zaman et al., 2005). lowing main objectives: assess the wildlife fauna in In December 1922, a partitioned neutral zone JO-Wafra main area; and compare the quality of ha - (PNZ) was established by agreement between the bitat inside and outside the JO-Wafra main area. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia and the State of Kuwait, The work has been implemented between Kuwait in order to allow tribesmen from both countries to Institute for Scientific Research (KISR) and Kuwait use this favorite grazing ground (Chichester, 2000). Gulf Oil Company (KGOC). Biodiversity and conservation of Wildlife at the Wafra area in Kuwait 181 MaT eRIals aND MeThODs ResUlTs The wildlife fauna study commenced in De - From December 2005 to March 2006, 17 trips cember 2005 and terminated in March 2006. This were made to the JO-Wafra main (fenced) and the report covers only the study period (i.e. from Ja - unfenced South Umm Guddair (SUG) oilfields. A nuary to March, 2006), wherein 15 field data col - total of 15 field data collecting exercises were lection exercises were performed with a total of performed. This included line transects, baited 345 field data collected from 11 selected wildlife mammal trappings and pitfall trappings, conduc - ted over at least three consecutive days (Table 2; (fauna) study sites, within the fenced JO-Wafra Figs. 1-2). main oilfield and the unfenced SUG (South Umm Line Transects (LT): a total of 49 LT exercises Guddair) oilfield. Selections of wildlife study sites were performed, covering the winter and early at the JO-Wafra oilfield were performed during re - spring periods of the country. It was noticeable that connaissance surveys. The criteria used in selecting during the last days of line transect exercises, more the possible wildlife study sites were: (1) type of birds were observed and even the shy Red fox ( Vul - habitat that include soil and vegetation cover; and pes vulpes ) was recorded. This may be due to the (2) location within the oilfield, disturbed or undi - rise in temperature and the pleasant spring weather sturbed (see Table 1). in the air. More than 34 species of wildlife fauna Several wildlife survey methodologies were im - were recorded from the line transects performed. plemented to study the wildlife biodiversity, na - These included 27 species of birds, one species of mammal, one species of reptile and more than six species of invertebrates (butterflies, dragonflies, Types of habitat Wildlife study sites number flies and ground hoppers).
Recommended publications
  • Empusidae: Mantodea) from Uttar-Pradesh, India Received: 01-01-2018 Accepted: 02-02-2018
    Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 2018; 6(2): 1242-1246 E-ISSN: 2320-7078 P-ISSN: 2349-6800 First report of Empusa spinosa Krauss, 1902 JEZS 2018; 6(2): 1242-1246 © 2018 JEZS (Empusidae: Mantodea) from Uttar-Pradesh, India Received: 01-01-2018 Accepted: 02-02-2018 Ramesh Singh Yadav Ramesh Singh Yadav Government School Dehariya, Zamania, Ghazipur, Uttar Abstract Pradesh, India Mantids are key agent of Natural and Biological control. They are very diverse fauna. Their diversity in Uttar Pradesh is very negligible. The present study was based on the specimens collected of the subfamily Empusinae during the course of a field survey of the district Ghazipur, Uttar-Pradesh in the month of October 15, 2017. The Mantids were collected from the plantation of the Tectona by hand picking. One female and one male mantids fauna have recorded and identified as Empusa spinosa Krauss, 1902. The fauna have firstly recorded from the district Ghazipur as well as Uttar-Pradesh also. The descriptions of the species have made based on the morphological characters. The identifying features of species were Vertex of head prolonged into a more or less conical protuberance, divided at apex. Antenna of male was pectinate and female filiform; internal spines of fore femur with each long spine alternating with 3-4 short spines. The Pronotum was slender and long. Fore coxa with prolonged spiniform process at distal end and fore femur without dialation and mid as well as hind femora without ventral lobes. Keywords: empusidae, Empusa spinosa¸ ghazipur, mantids, survey, Uttar-Pradesh 1. Introduction Mantids belong to the order Mantodea which are the very sophisticated insect fauna in the terrestrial ecosystem.
    [Show full text]
  • A Contribution to the Knowledge of the Mantodea (Insecta) Fauna of Iran 665-673 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; Download Unter
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Linzer biologische Beiträge Jahr/Year: 2014 Band/Volume: 0046_1 Autor(en)/Author(s): Ghahari Hassan, Nasser Mohamed Gemal El-Den Artikel/Article: A contribution to the knowledge of the Mantodea (Insecta) fauna of Iran 665-673 © Biologiezentrum Linz/Austria; download unter www.biologiezentrum.at Linzer biol. Beitr. 46/1 665-673 31.7.2014 A contribution to the knowledge of the Mantodea (Insecta) fauna of Iran H. GHAHARI & M.G. El-Den NASSER A b s t r a c t : This paper deals with the fauna of some species of Mantodea from different regions of Iran. In total 17 species from 11 genera (including Amorphoscelis STÅL, Blepharopsis REHN, Empusa COHN, Eremiaphila LEFÈBVRE, Ameles BURMEISTER, Armene STÅL, Bolivaria STÅL, Hierodula BURMEISTER, Iris SAUSSURE, Mantis LINNAEUS, Oxythespis SAUSSURE) and 5 families (Amorphoscelidae, Empusidae, Eremiaphilidae, Mantidae and Tarachodidae) were collected and identified. An identification key, synonymies and distribution data for the species are given. Key words: Mantodea, Identification key, Amorphoscelidae, Empusidae, Eremiaphilidae, Mantidae, Iran. Introduction Iran has a spectacular position between three different ecological zones, the Palaearctic, Afrotropical and Indomalayan. Although most of the Iranian fauna is related to the Palaearctic region, the fauna of the two other regions are also represented and are recorded from different areas of the country, especially the south (ZEHZAD et al. 2002; SAKENIN et al. 2011). From a taxonomic point of view, the Mantodea of Iran are poorly studied by a few disparate studies, either widely separated in time or in the aim of the work itself, since most concern countries other than Iran or orthopteroid insects other than mantids (UVAROV 1938; UVAROV & DIRSH 1952; BEIER 1956; MOFIDI-NEYESTANAK 2000; GHAHARI et al.
    [Show full text]
  • ARTICULATA 2011 26 (1): 1–42 FAUNISTIK Mantodea from Turkey and Cyprus
    ZOBODAT - www.zobodat.at Zoologisch-Botanische Datenbank/Zoological-Botanical Database Digitale Literatur/Digital Literature Zeitschrift/Journal: Articulata - Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Orthopterologie e.V. DGfO Jahr/Year: 2011 Band/Volume: 26_2011 Autor(en)/Author(s): Ehrmann Reinhard Artikel/Article: Mantodea from Turkey and Cyprus. Articulata 1-42 ARTICULATA 2011 26 (1): 1௅42 FAUNISTIK Mantodea from Turkey and Cyprus (Dictyoptera: Mantodea) 1 Reinhard Ehrmann Abstract The Mantodea from Turkey and Cyprus are listed with the genera and species alphabetically and amended with the most important synonyms. 263 publications with locality data: Anatolia, Asia Minor, Turkey, and Cyprus were inspected, evaluated and if applicable supplemented with comments (EHRMANN & SCHÜTTE 2005). The data for outdoor and laboratory observations are added to the biology of some species of the genus Eremiaphila and Rivetina. The order Mantodea is divided into 15 families, of which 5 families are found in Turkey and Cyprus (Amorphoscelidae, Eremiaphilidae, Tarachodidae, Mantidae, Empusidae; system by EHRMANN & ROY 2002: 374-378). Worldwide 452 genera and 2.450 species have been described, of which 13 genera and 23 species are known from Turkey and Cyprus: Ameles BURMEISTER, 1838 (3 species), Amor- phoscelis STÅL, 1871 (1 species), Armene STÅL, 1877 (1 species), Blepharopsis REHN, 1902 (1 species), Bolivaria STÅL, 1877 (1 species), Empusa ILLIGER, 1798 (4 species), Eremiaphila LEFÈBVRE, 1835 (2 species), Geomantis PANTEL, 1896 (1 species), Hierodula BURMEISTER, 1838 (1 species), Iris SAUSSURE, 1869 (2 species), Mantis LINNÉ, 1758 (1 species), Rivetina BERLAND & CHOPARD, 1922 (4 species) and Sphodromantis STÅL, 1871 (1 species). Uncertain for Turkey are: Empusa pennata (THUNBERG, 1815), Empusa uvarovi CHOPARD, 1921, Eremiaphila persica persica WERNER, 1905, Eremiaphila turcica WESTWOOD, 1889 and Rivetina baetica (RAMBUR, 1839).
    [Show full text]
  • Mantodea Oasis of Palaearctic Region: Biogeographical Analysis of Mantodea in Egypt M
    Okely et al. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control (2020) 30:136 Egyptian Journal of https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-020-00336-8 Biological Pest Control RESEARCH Open Access Mantodea oasis of Palaearctic region: biogeographical analysis of Mantodea in Egypt M. Okely, M. Nasser, R. Enan, S. GadAllah and S. AlAshaal* Abstract Background: Egypt forms a home for the highest number of recorded Mantodea species of the Palaearctic Region. The status and ecology of such diversity are far from being completely understood. Main body: Through this study, the similarity of Mantodea species composition among Egyptian ecological zones has been examined by using the Sørensen-Dice coefficient, beside the calculation of species richness for each zone. Also, maximum entropy (Maxent) modeling was used to estimate the potential distribution of Mantodea species throughout the country. Three topographical and 19 bioclimatic variables have been used to estimate the current status of all Mantodea species in Egypt. The collected materials of adult mantis have been used to analyze the seasonality of 14 Egyptian common genera. Our results indicated that there was a high faunal similarity between the Western and Eastern deserts, the coastal strip, and the lower Nile valley. The lowest similarity was between Gebel Elba and all other zones. The analysis of habitat suitability of Mantodea in Egypt was fragmentary and focused on different distinct ecological zones. Altitude was the most effective ecological factor that affected Mantodea distribution as a group. Analysis of seasonality data of the common genera of Mantodea indicated that all are found in summer except for Miomantis, Severinia, and Sinaiella.
    [Show full text]
  • Mantis Study Group Newsletter, 1 (August 1996)
    ISSN 1364-3193 Mantis Study Group Newsletter 1 August 1996 Editorial Welcome to the first MSG Newsletter. Some of you will be aware of how the group was formed; others may not, so here is a bit of the background. My main interest is in phasmids but I also collect a few mantids and cockroaches on my visits to Borneo, and I rear a few other species at home. Over the past few years I have been getting an increasing number of letters and phone calls from people requesting advice or information about mantids. Requests varied from basic care information to detailed questions on identification and natural history. Eventually I decided that there was sufficient interest to make it worthwhile forming a group to try to make information more widely available. Several people I have spoken to have said they had also been thinking about forming a group, so there seemed to be sufficient interest! The MSG was founded on 18th May 1996 at a meeting at Dudley Zoo, the meeting was held in conjunction with the Blattodea Culture Group. At the meeting people were appointed to take responsibility for four areas: Newsletter Editor Livestock co-ordination Phil Bragg Steve Clark 51, Longfield Lane. 41B Macbean Street I1keston, Woolwich Derbyshire. London DE74DX. SEl86LW U.K. U.K. Tel: 0115-9305010 Tel: 0181-854-1159 Newsletter, printing & distribution Membership Secretary & Treasurer Kieren Pitts Paul Taylor 17 Priory Road 24, Forge Road, Exeter Shustoke, Devon Coleshill, EX47AW Birmingham. U.K. B462AU. Tel: 01392-427919 U.K. Tel: 01675-481578 David Yager (Maryland, USA) supplied a long list of people that he knew to had an interest in mantids so, combining this with my own list, over 100 membership forms were sent out with in the first two weeks of the group being formed.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Review of Mantodea Occurrence in Egypt with Notes About Eremiaphila Spp
    Available online at www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com Scholars Research Library European Journal of Zoological Research, 2017, 5 (2): 25-33 (http://www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com) ISSN:2278-7356 Historical Review of Mantodea Occurrence in Egypt with Notes about Eremiaphila spp. in the Middle East and North Africa Rabia Enan, Sohair GadAllah, Mohamed Okely, Mohamed Nasser* Department of Entomology, Faculty of Science, Ain Shams University Abstract Mantis is charismatic predatory creatures of order Mantodea. They constituted small insects order with about 2500 species. They form one of the most diverse and unique predatory insects on variety of ecosystems and habitats through our planet. Through this work basic information about these insects on Egypt are provided including comprehensive literature survey and notes concerning most important species and specialists through history. Also, the records of occurrence and new species discovered from the Middle East and North Africa were given for genus Eremiaphila. Keywords: Ehrmann, Desert mantis, Nile, Egypt, Algeria, Saudi Arabia, Iran INTRODUCTION Mantids inspired pharaohs since 3000 years ago and ancient records indicated that mantis formed a part of their culture [1]. Mantodea is a small insect order with approximately 2500 species which has been recorded worldwide [2,3]. Praying mantises are predatory insects distributed in tropical and subtropical habitats while few species are found on tempter and cold regions [4]. Several previous studies were discussed the mantis occurrence in Egypt with the last revision of the order was made by Mohammad et al. [5], where they recorded 60 species in 21 genera and 4 families with one new species Elaea solimani and one new record Eremiaphila gigas Beier, also Calidomantis ehrenbergi Werner considered as a new synonym of Sinaiella sabulosa Uvarov.
    [Show full text]
  • A Faunistic Study on the Mantodea (Insecta) from Western Iran
    © Norwegian Journal of Entomology. 21 June 2016 A faunistic study on the Mantodea (Insecta) from western Iran NAJMEH SAMIN, HASSAN GHAHARI & AHMAD KATBEH-BADR Samin, N., Ghahari, H. & Katbeh-Badr, A. 2016. A faunistic study on the Mantodea (Insecta) from western Iran. Norwegian Journal of Entomology 63, 116–119. This paper deals with the fauna of Mantodea in Ilam and Kermanshah provinces in western Iran. In total 8 species from 7 genera (Empusa Illiger, 1798, Ameles Burmeister, 1838, Mantis Linnaeus, 1758, Sphodromantis Stål, 1871, Microthespis Werner, 1908, Eremiaphila Lefèbvre, 1835 and Iris Saussure, 1869) and 5 families (Empusidae, Amelidae, Mantidae, Eremiaphilidae and Tarachodidae) were collected and identified. Ameles syriensis Giglio-Tos, 1915 and Eremiaphila andresi Werner, 1910 are new records for the fauna of Iran. Key words: Mantodea, fauna, new records, Iran Najmeh Samin, Young Researchers and Elite Club, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University Tehran, Iran. E-mail: [email protected] * Hassan Ghahari, Department of Plant Protection, Yadegar – e- Imam Khomeini (RAH) Shahre Rey Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran Ahmad Katbeh-Badr, Department of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jordan, Amman, 11942, Jordan. E-mail: [email protected] * Corresponding author. E-mail: [email protected] Introduction 2014). About 34 species of mantids have been recorded from Iran so far, but the true number Mantodea is a group of mostly large and of Iranian Mantodea needs more investigations. conspicuous predatory insects, which is mostly The aim of this research is a faunistic work on confined to the tropical regions and includes Mantodea specimens collected from some regions approximately 2366 described species in 436 of western Iran, and introducing two new records genera (Ehrmann 2002, Otte & Spearman 2005, for the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Wadi Wurayah National Park, Scientific Research Report
    Wadi Wurayah National Park Scientific Research Report 2013 – 2015 PROJECT PARTNERS Emirates Wildlife Society-WWF Emirates Wildlife Society-WWF is a UAE environmental nongovernmental organisation established under the patronage of H. H. Sheikh Hamdan bin Zayed Al Nahyan, the ruler’s representative in the Western Region and the chairman of Environmental Agency Abu Dhabi. Since its establishment, Emirates Wildlife Society has been working in association with WWF, one of the largest and most respected independent global conservation organisations, to initiate and implement environmental conservation and education projects in the region. EWS-WWF has been active in the UAE since 2001, and its mission is to work with people and institutions within the UAE and the region to conserve biodiversity and tackle climate change through education, awareness, policy, and science-based conservation initiatives. Fujairah Municipality Fujairah Municipality is EWS-WWFs strategic partner and the driver of the development of Wadi Wurayah National Park. The mission of Fujairah Municipality is to provide the people of Fujairah with advanced infrastructure, a sustainable environment, and excellence in services. Lead Author: HSBC Bank Middle East Ltd Jacky Judas, PhD, Research Manager, WWNP - EWS-WWF HSBC Bank Middle East is one of the largest international banks in the Middle Reviewer: East, and, since 2006, it has been the main stakeholder and financial partner of Olivier Combreau, PhD, consultant EWS-WWF on the Wadi Wurayah National Park project. HSBC Bank Middle East has funded most of the research programmes conducted to date in Wadi Wurayah National Park. EWS-WWF Head Office P.O. Box 45553 Abu Dhabi United Arab Emirates T: +971 2 634 7117 F: +971 2 634 1220 Earthwatch Institute EWS-WWF Dubai Office Earthwatch Institute is a leading global nongovernmental organisation that P.O.
    [Show full text]
  • Mantodea of Egypt
    Zootaxa 3044: 1–27 (2011) ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) www.mapress.com/zootaxa/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2011 · Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) Mantodea of Egypt SALWA KAMAL MOHAMMAD1, SOHAIR MOHAMMAD GAD ALLA1, HAYAM EL-HAMOULY1, REINHARD EHRMANN2 & MOHAMED GEMAL EL-DEN NASSER3,4 1Department of Entomology, Faculty of Sciences, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt 2Staatliches Museum für Naturkunde, Karlsruhe (SMNK), Germany 3Department of Plant Protection, College of Food and Agriculture Science, King Saud Univeristy, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. E-mails: [email protected], [email protected] 3Corresponding author Abstract The Mantodea of Egypt were studied by examining and identifying specimens from four main Egyptian collections and some of those preserved in international museums, collecting specimens from various parts of the country between July 2007 and April 2010, and previous Egyptian records. We found 60 species belonging to 21 genera and 4 families. Eremi- aphilidae included 31 species in 2 genera with one new record from Egypt, Eremiaphila gigas; Empusidae, 7 species in 4 genera; Mantidae, 18 species in 13 genera with one new species, Elaea solimani; and Tarachodidae, 3 species in 2 genera. We provide identification keys for Egyptian taxa, data on the material examined, the world distribution, synonyms and a description of the new species. Key words: Dictyoptera, Mantodea, Mantidae, Eremiaphilidae, Empusidae, Tarachodidae, Egypt Introduction The Mantodea of Egypt constitutes the largest fauna in a region of comparable size in the Palearctic region. The first documented work on this group from Egypt was by Savigny (1809) in the famous book "Description de l'Égypte," who recorded 14 species in the genus Mantis and figured six unknown species (Audouin 1827, Krauss 1890, Néret 1994).
    [Show full text]
  • Manual of Praying Mantis Morphology, Nomenclature, and Practices (Insecta, Mantodea)
    A peer-reviewed open-access journal ZooKeys 696:Manual 1–100 of(2017) praying mantis morphology, nomenclature, and practices (Insecta, Mantodea) 1 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.696.12542 MONOGRAPH http://zookeys.pensoft.net Launched to accelerate biodiversity research Manual of praying mantis morphology, nomenclature, and practices (Insecta, Mantodea) Sydney K. Brannoch1,2, Frank Wieland3, Julio Rivera4, Klaus-Dieter Klass5, Olivier Béthoux6, Gavin J. Svenson1,2 1 Department of Invertebrate Zoology, Cleveland Museum of Natural History, 1 Wade Oval Drive, Cleveland, Ohio, USA 2 Department of Biology, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, Ohio, USA 3 Pfalzmuseum für Naturkunde - POLLICHIA-Museum, Hermann-Schäfer-Str. 17, 67098 Bad Dürkheim, Germany 4 Universidad San Ignacio de Loyola, Perú 5 Senckenberg Natural History Collections Dresden, Königsbrücker Landstrasse 159, D-01109 Dresden, Germany 6 Centre de Recherche sur la Paleobio- diversite et les Paleoenvironnements (CR2P, UMR 7207), Sorbonne Universites, MNHN, CNRS, UPMC- Paris6, Museum National d’Histoire Naturelle, 57 Rue Cuvier, CP 38, 75005 Paris, France Corresponding author: Sydney K. Brannoch ([email protected]) Academic editor: P. Stoev | Received 6 March 2016 | Accepted 19 June 2017 | Published 13 September 2017 http://zoobank.org/C7B4D1FF-AD2C-4E30-9679-8673D4AB8219 Citation: Brannoch SK, Wieland F, Rivera J, Klass K-D, Béthoux O, Svenson GJ (2017) Manual of praying mantis morphology, nomenclature, and practices (Insecta, Mantodea). ZooKeys 696: 1–100. https://doi.org/10.3897/ zookeys.696.12542 Abstract This study provides a comprehensive review of historical morphological nomenclature used for praying mantis (Mantodea) morphology, which includes citations, original use, and assignment of homology. All referenced structures across historical works correspond to a proposed standard term for use in all subse- quent works pertaining to praying mantis morphology and systematics.
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogenetic System of Mantodea (Insecta: Dictyoptera)
    The phylogenetic system of Mantodea (Insecta: Dictyoptera) Dissertation zur Erlangung des Doktorgrades der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultäten der Georg-August-Universität zu Göttingen vorgelegt von Frank Wieland aus Oldenburg Göttingen 2010 D7 Referent: Prof. Dr. R. Willmann Korreferent: PD Dr. T. Hörnschemeyer Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: “In order to arrive at a rational classification for Mantodea, it would be helpful, first, to take an inventory of various useful morphological characteristics and evaluate their relative importance and, then, to determine for each which is primitive (plesiomorph) and which is derived (apomorph) by calculating which changes (probably) arose only once and which could have arisen several times. It is also necessary to consider the fact that major variations do not necessarily mean a distant phylogenetic relationship and that striking resemblances do not necessarily translate into a close relationship.” Roger Roy, 1999 “Da es in dieser Gruppe äußerst schwierig ist, Primitives, Einfaches von Vereinfachtem zu unterscheiden, und da sicher eine Menge von Konvergenzen vorliegen, bedarf es noch weiterer sorgfältiger morphologischer Untersuchungen.” Anton Handlirsch, 1930a “[Morphology] is the most interesting department of natural history, and may be said to be its very soul.” Charles Darwin, 1859 Abstract The first reconstruction of mantodean phylogeny using a large morphological dataset of the entire group is presented. 152 morphological characters were encoded for 122 species of Mantodea, encompassing all 15 currently recognized families, 34 of 48 subfamilies (71 %) and 33 of 46 tribus (72 %). Structures from the entire exoskeleton were studied, including characters that have been stated to be convergent de- velopments before without data-based evidence. Fossils, behaviour and ontogenetic observations were used for the interpretation of structures and the discussion of evolutionary scenarios.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Seasonality of Some of the Ground Dwelling Invertebrates in the Eastern Region of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
    Vol. 6(3), pp. 271-279, March 2014 DOI: 10.5897/IJBC2013.0627 International Journal of Biodiversity and ISSN 2141-243X © 2014 Academic Journals http://www.academicjournals.org/IJBC Conservation Full Length Research Paper Diversity and seasonality of some of the ground dwelling invertebrates in the Eastern Region of Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates Anitha Saji* and Shaikha Salem Al Dhaheri Terrestrial and Marine Biodiversity Sector, Assessment and Conservation, Environment Agency, P.O. Box 45553, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates. Accepted 27 January, 2014 A study was conducted to understand the diversity, distribution, abundance and seasonality of ground dwelling invertebrate species in the eastern region of Abu Dhabi Emirate, from March 2010 to February 2011. Pitfall traps were used for this study in two sites with distinct micro - habitats in the Eastern Region of the Emirate. The site includes a wadi habitat at Jebel Hafit, Al Ain and another one is a gravel plain habitat at Mezyad, Al Ain. Beetles (Coleoptera) of the family Tenebrionidae (darkling beetles) are a conspicuous element of these arid and semi-arid environments. Variable stalker beetle ( Adesmia cancellata cothurnata ) was the most abundant Tenebrionid among twenty species collected using pitfall traps in the wadi of Jebel Hafit whereas opossum beetle ( Mesostena puncticollis ) was the most abundant Tenebrionid among twenty in the sandy gravel plain habitat of Um Ghafa, Mezyad. Key words: Diversity, seasonality, Abu Dhabi Emirate, Jebel Hafit, Mezyad, darkling beetles, pitfall trapping, ground dwelling invertebrates. INTRODUCTION A definitive goal for invertebrate conservation would be characterized by numerous wadis which offer a combina- the wide use of a set of relatively standardized sampling tion of climate, soil and water suitable for vegetation.
    [Show full text]