DOCSLIB.ORG

My Tax Return Was Rejected – Someone Else Claimed My Dependents….NOW WHAT?

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
My Tax Return Was Rejected – Someone Else Claimed My Dependents….NOW WHAT? My Tax Return was Rejected – Someone Else Claimed My Dependents….NOW WHAT? As an Enrolled Agent, (America’s Tax Expert) a federally licensed tax professional and a Certified Tax Coach, Lynn believes in keeping taxpayers informed with the most up-to-date information available. Please review the below information and call our office if you have questions or need professional assistance with an IRS or other tax planning matter. You recently filed a personal income tax return that has been rejected by the Internal Revenue Service. It appears that one or more of the social security number(s) for a dependent listed on your tax return has already been used on another, previously filed, tax return. Now what should you do? What should you do first? 1. Verify that the names, dates of birth and social security numbers used when filing your tax return are correct. 2. If you have dependents that are of the age where they have jobs and may have filed a tax return of their own, verify with the dependent(s) that they DID NOT claim themselves as a dependent on the tax return that they filed. (THIS IS THE MOST COMMON CAUSE OF THIS ERROR.) 3. If you and your spouse filed separate tax returns, verify with the other spouse if they claimed the dependent in question on the return they filed. If communication between the parents is not possible due to marital circumstances and all other factors listed above are not in question, then it is most likely that the other parent has claimed your dependent. What should you do next? Q. Can I still electronically file my return this year? A. No. You will not be able to electronically file your tax return for the current year and still claim the duplicated dependent. You will need to file a paper tax return in order to claim the dependent for the current year. If you want to file electronically, you will have to remove the dependent(s) that have been claimed by another taxpayer. Q. Does this mean that I don’t get to deduct my dependent this year? A. No. If you are the custodial parent, or you have a signed release by the custodial parent authorizing you to claim the dependent, then you will simply report the dependent on your tax return and claim them, but you will have to file a paper tax return. Q. Does that mean that both parents get to claim the dependent? A. No. Both taxpayers that claimed the dependent child will receive a letter from the IRS after tax season. The letter will notify you that a dependent reported on your return has been claimed by more than one taxpayer. If you feel that you are correctly entitled to claim the dependent(s) in question, you may be requested to document, through explanation and other evidence, to the IRS, that you are the taxpayer entitled to the deduction. The other taxpayer will be requested to do the same. Q. Will this happen again next year? A. There is no way to know what another taxpayer will or will not do in the future. As long as you are the parent (or taxpayer) entitled to claim the child as a dependent, you should keep filing your tax return in the most accurate and correct manner possible. Tax Filing Tip: Keep good, well organized records, and be prepared to file as early as possible next year. Taxpayers who rightfully claim dependents and who are prepared to file early in tax season (before the other spouse gets around to filing) usually experience fewer tax filing problems. We hope that the above information has been helpful to you. If you should require our assistance during the above process or need us to handle the matter for you, we do handle tax representation matters as separate engagements from tax preparation. As an Enrolled Agent, Lynn specializes in tax problem resolution and has handled many such cases for clients with positive outcomes. Let us know if you need our help. If you are overwhelmed with your current tax matters or do not even know where to begin, a professional review of the situation can and should be the first course of action. Don’t let an unfortunate situation become a tax nightmare! If you have questions on the above material, or would like to schedule an appointment to get your tax situation resolved or to review how you may take advantage of the many tax-saving strategies and opportunities which are available, call our office today! We will be glad to schedule your personalized tax resolution or planning session. We can be reached at 863-295-9895 or by visiting our website http://www.lyncotax.com/contact.php or sending an email to [email protected]. We hope this information is helpful to you. Lynn A. Schmidt, EA, CTC Enrolled Agent & Certified Tax Coach www.LyncoTax.com .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Go-Giver Ch1.Pdf
    The Go-Giver A Little Story About A Powerful Business Idea By Bob Burg and John David Mann Excerpted from The Go-Giver. Published by Portfolio / Penguin. Copyright Bob Burg and John David Mann, 2007-2013. 1: The Go-Getter If there was anyone at the Clason-Hill Trust Corporation who was a go-getter, it was Joe. He worked hard, worked fast, and was headed for the top. At least, that was his plan. Joe was an ambitious young man, aiming for the stars. 4 Still, sometimes it felt as if the harder and faster he worked, the further away his goals appeared. For such a 6 dedicated go-getter, it seemed like he was doing a lot of going but not a lot of getting. 8 Work being as busy as it was, though, Joe didn’t have 9 much time to think about that. Especially on a day like today—a Friday, with only a week left in the quarter and a critical deadline to meet. A deadline he couldn’t afford not to meet. Today, in the waning hours of the afternoon, Joe decided it was time to call in a favor, so he placed a phone call— but the conversation wasn’t going well. “Carl, tell me you’re not telling me this . .” Joe took a breath to keep the desperation out of his voice. “Neil Hansen?! Who the heck is Neil Hansen? . Well I don’t 1 21066_01_1-134_r4mw.indd 1 h 9/25/07 1:12:57 PM THE GO-GIVER care what he’s offering, we can meet those specs .
    [Show full text]
  • Frequencies Between Serial Killer Typology And
    FREQUENCIES BETWEEN SERIAL KILLER TYPOLOGY AND THEORIZED ETIOLOGICAL FACTORS A dissertation presented to the faculty of ANTIOCH UNIVERSITY SANTA BARBARA in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PSYCHOLOGY in CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY By Leryn Rose-Doggett Messori March 2016 FREQUENCIES BETWEEN SERIAL KILLER TYPOLOGY AND THEORIZED ETIOLOGICAL FACTORS This dissertation, by Leryn Rose-Doggett Messori, has been approved by the committee members signed below who recommend that it be accepted by the faculty of Antioch University Santa Barbara in partial fulfillment of requirements for the degree of DOCTOR OF PSYCHOLOGY Dissertation Committee: _______________________________ Ron Pilato, Psy.D. Chairperson _______________________________ Brett Kia-Keating, Ed.D. Second Faculty _______________________________ Maxann Shwartz, Ph.D. External Expert ii © Copyright by Leryn Rose-Doggett Messori, 2016 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT FREQUENCIES BETWEEN SERIAL KILLER TYPOLOGY AND THEORIZED ETIOLOGICAL FACTORS LERYN ROSE-DOGGETT MESSORI Antioch University Santa Barbara Santa Barbara, CA This study examined the association between serial killer typologies and previously proposed etiological factors within serial killer case histories. Stratified sampling based on race and gender was used to identify thirty-six serial killers for this study. The percentage of serial killers within each race and gender category included in the study was taken from current serial killer demographic statistics between 1950 and 2010. Detailed data
    [Show full text]
  • Adoption Tax Benefits: an Overview
    Adoption Tax Benefits: An Overview Updated May 18, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44745 SUMMARY R44745 Adoption Tax Benefits: An Overview May 18, 2020 The federal government supports adoption in two primary ways: federal grants to state governments and tax benefits for individual taxpayers that help offset the costs of adopting a Margot L. Crandall-Hollick child. This report focuses on federal adoption tax benefits, which consist of an adoption tax credit Acting Section Research and an income tax exclusion for employer-provided adoption assistance. Manager The adoption tax credit helps qualifying taxpayers offset some of the costs of adopting a child. Although the credit may be claimed for nearly all types of adoptions (excluding the adoption of a spouse’s child), there are some special rules related to claiming the credit for international adoptions and for adoptions of children with special needs (generally children whom the state child welfare agency considers difficult to place for adoption). In 2020, taxpayers may be able to receive an adoption credit of up to $14,300 (this amount is annually adjusted for inflation). The credit is reduced for taxpayers with income over $214,520 and is phased out completely for taxpayers with more than $254,520 in income (these amounts are subject to annual inflation adjustment). The adoption credit is not refundable. However, the credit may be carried forward and claimed on future tax returns for up to five years after initially claimed. In addition, taxpayers whose employers offer qualifying adoption assistance programs as a fringe benefit may not have to pay income taxes on some or all of the value of this benefit.
    [Show full text]
  • Religious-Verses-And-Poems
    A CLUSTER OF PRECIOUS MEMORIES A bud the Gardener gave us, A cluster of precious memories A pure and lovely child. Sprayed with a million tears He gave it to our keeping Wishing God had spared you If only for a few more years. To cherish undefiled; You left a special memory And just as it was opening And a sorrow too great to hold, To the glory of the day, To us who loved and lost you Down came the Heavenly Father Your memory will never grow old. Thanks for the years we had, And took our bud away. Thanks for the memories we shared. We only prayed that when you left us That you knew how much we cared. 1 2 AFTERGLOW A Heart of Gold I’d like the memory of me A heart of gold stopped beating to be a happy one. I’d like to leave an afterglow Working hands at rest of smiles when life is done. God broke our hearts to prove to us I’d like to leave an echo He only takes the best whispering softly down the ways, Leaves and flowers may wither Of happy times and laughing times The golden sun may set and bright and sunny days. I’d like the tears of those who grieve But the hearts that loved you dearly to dry before too long, Are the ones that won’t forget. And cherish those very special memories to which I belong. 4 3 ALL IS WELL A LIFE – WELL LIVED Death is nothing at all, I have only slipped away into the next room.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Law and Legal Reasoning Law Is
    CHAPTER 1: INTRODUCTION TO LAW AND LEGAL REASONING LAW IS "MAN MADE" IT CHANGES OVER TIME TO ACCOMMODATE SOCIETY'S NEEDS LAW IS MADE BY LEGISLATURE LAW IS INTERPRETED BY COURTS TO DETERMINE 1)WHETHER IT IS "CONSTITUTIONAL" 2)WHO IS RIGHT OR WRONG THERE IS A PROCESS WHICH MUST BE FOLLOWED (CALLED "PROCEDURAL LAW") I. Thomas Jefferson: "The study of the law qualifies a man to be useful to himself, to his neighbors, and to the public." II. Ask Several Students to give their definition of "Law." A. Even after years and thousands of dollars, "LAW" still is not easy to define B. What does law Consist of ? Law consists of enforceable rule governing relationships among individuals and between individuals and their society. 1. Students Need to Understand. a. The law is a set of general ideas b. When these general ideas are applied, a judge cannot fit a case to suit a rule; he must fit (or find) a rule to suit the unique case at hand. c. The judge must also supply legitimate reasons for his decisions. C. So, How was the Law Created. The law considered in this text are "man made" law. This law can (and will) change over time in response to the changes and needs of society. D. Example. Grandma, who is 87 years old, walks into a pawn shop. She wants to sell her ring that has been in the family for 200 years. Grandma asks the dealer, "how much will you give me for this ring." The dealer, in good faith, tells Grandma he doesn't know what kind of metal is in the ring, but he will give her $150.
    [Show full text]
  • Judge, Jury, and Executioner: Why Private Parties Have Standing to Challenge an Executive Order That Prohibits ICTS Transactions with Foreign Adversaries
    American University Law Review Volume 69 Issue 6 Article 4 2020 Judge, Jury, and Executioner: Why Private Parties Have Standing to Challenge an Executive Order That Prohibits ICTS Transactions with Foreign Adversaries Ari K. Bental American University Washington College of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr Part of the Law and Politics Commons, and the President/Executive Department Commons Recommended Citation Bental, Ari K. (2020) "Judge, Jury, and Executioner: Why Private Parties Have Standing to Challenge an Executive Order That Prohibits ICTS Transactions with Foreign Adversaries," American University Law Review: Vol. 69 : Iss. 6 , Article 4. Available at: https://digitalcommons.wcl.american.edu/aulr/vol69/iss6/4 This Comment is brought to you for free and open access by the Washington College of Law Journals & Law Reviews at Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in American University Law Review by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ American University Washington College of Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Judge, Jury, and Executioner: Why Private Parties Have Standing to Challenge an Executive Order That Prohibits ICTS Transactions with Foreign Adversaries Abstract On May 15, 2019, President Donald Trump, invoking his constitutional executive and statutory emergency powers, signed Executive Order 13,873, which prohibits U.S. persons from conducting information and communications technology and services (ICTS) transactions with foreign adversaries. Though the executive branch has refrained from publicly identifying countries or entities as foreign adversaries under the Executive Order, observers agree that the Executive Order’s main targets are China and telecommunications companies, namely Huawei, that threaten American national security and competitiveness in the race to provide the lion’s share of critical infrastructure to support the world’s growing 5G network.
    [Show full text]
  • Reemployment Assistance Resource Guide - COVID-19
    Reemployment Assistance Resource Guide - COVID-19 Updated: December 30, 2020 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITY | 107 East Madison St. Tallahassee, FL Reemployment Assistance Frequently Asked Questions and Additional Resources Table of Contents: Eligibility (updated 12/30/2020) ................................................................................................................. 2 General Reemployment Assistance Questions (updated 6/5/2020) ...................................................... 5 Reemployment Assistance Waivers (updated 12/30/2020) ..................................................................... 7 COVID-19 and Reemployment Assistance (updated 9/4/2020) .............................................................. 9 CARES Act (updated 12/1/2020) .............................................................................................................. 13 Applying for Reemployment Assistance (updated 12/30/2020) ............................................................ 17 CONNECT (updated 12/30/2020) .............................................................................................................. 24 Receiving Reemployment Assistance Benefits (updated 6/5/2020) ................................................... 30 Adjudication (updated 6/5/2020) ............................................................................................................. 34 Appeals (updated 6/5/2020) ....................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Unemployment Insurance Rights and Responsibilities
    Commonwealth of Kentucky Education and Workforce Development Cabinet Department of Workforce Investment UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES kcc.ky.gov IMPORTANT! This document contains important information about your unemployment compensation rights, responsibilities and/or benefits. It is critical that you understand the information in this document. IMMEDIATELY: Call 502-564-2900 for translation assistance and better understanding of this document. Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) Dial 711 ¡IMPORTANTE! Este documento(s) contiene información importante sobre sus derechos, y responsabilidades, obligaciones y/o beneficios de compensación por desempleo. Es muy importante que usted entienda la información contenida en este documento. INMEDIATAMENTE: Llame al número 502-564-2900 para asistencia de traducción y una mejor comprensión de este documento. Telecommunications Relay Service (TRS) Dial 711 TABLE OF CONTENTS Unemployment Insurance Claim Filing Options .................................................2 How Do I Request My Benefits? .........................................................................2 Payment Methods .................................................................................................3 Requirements While Requesting Unemployment Insurance Benefits .................3 Am I Eligible to Receive Benefits? ......................................................................5 Combined Wage Claims .......................................................................................6
    [Show full text]
  • How to Know If You're Dead
    How to Know If You're Dead Beating-heart cadavers, live burial, and the scientific search for the soul A patient on the way to surgery travels at twice the speed of a patient on the way to the morgue. Gurneys that ferry the living through hospital corridors move forward in an aura of purpose and push, flanked by caregivers with long strides and set faces, steadying IVs, pumping ambu bags, barreling into double doors. A gurney with a cadaver commands no urgency. It is wheeled by a single person, calmly and with little notice, like a shopping cart. For this reason, I thought I would be able to tell when the dead woman was wheeled past. I have been standing around at the nurses' station on one of the surgery floors of the University of California at San Francisco Medical Center, watching gurneys go by and waiting for Von Peterson, public affairs manager of the California Transplant Donor Network, and a cadaver I will call H. "There's your patient," says the charge nurse. A commotion of turquoise legs passes with unexpected forward-leaning urgency. H is unique in that she is both a dead person and a patient on the way to surgery. She is what's known as a "beating-heart cadaver," alive and well everywhere but her brain. Up until artificial respiration was developed, there was no such entity; without a functioning brain, a body will not breathe on its own. But hook it up to a respirator and its heart will beat, and the rest of its organs will, for a matter of days, continue to thrive.
    [Show full text]
  • Untying the Knot: Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait
    asia policy, number 2 (july 2006), 109–139 book review roundtable Richard C. Bush’s Untying the Knot: Making Peace in the Taiwan Strait Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press, 2005 ISBN: 0-815-71288-X (hardcover) Allen Carlson Derek Mitchell Lyle Goldstein Dan Blumenthal Mark Williams Steven M. Goldstein Richard C. Bush © The National Bureau of Asian Research, Seattle, Washington asia policy (K)not Yet Untied: Comments on Richard Bush’s Untying the Knot Allen Carlson ichard Bush, who served as the acting director of the American Institute R in Taiwan from 1997 to 2002, is one of America’s most experienced observers of Taiwanese politics. His new book, Untying the Knot, clearly reflects such expertise, and forwards a timely, comprehensive, and fairly well- balanced account of the evolution of contemporary cross-Strait relations. The book makes two main contributions to the already vast literature on this potentially explosive relationship. First, Bush attempts to explain the tenacity of conflict across the Taiwan Strait. As an initial step, he identifies sovereignty and security as forming the interlocking core of the conflictual relationship between Beijing and Taipei. He then calls attention to three “aggravating” factors—domestic politics, the decisionmaking process, and leverage-seeking—that have made this volatile situation even more intractable. As a second contribution, Bush suggests a set of policy measures that, if enacted, would be conducive to lessening tensions and reducing the chances of outright military conflict across the Taiwan Strait. More specifically, he recommends that Beijing move beyond the “one country, two systems” formula. Taipei is encouraged not only to refrain from pushing Beijing into a corner (via formal measures to declare Taiwan’s independence) but also to strengthen Taiwan’s own status both at home and abroad in order to maintain its negotiating position vis-à-vis the mainland.
    [Show full text]
  • The Unimportance of Identity
    2 The Unimportance of Identity DEREK PARFIT We can start with some science fiction. Here on Earth, I enter the Teletransporter. When I press some button, a machine destroys my body, while recording the exact states of all my cells. The information is sent by radio to Mars, where another machine makes, out of organic materials, a perfect copy of my body. The person who wakes up on Mars seems to re­ member living my life up to the moment when I pressed the button, and he is in every other way just like me. Of those who have thought about such cases, some believe that it would be I who would wake up on Mars. They regard Teletransportation as merely the fastest way of travelling. Others believe that, if I chose to be Teletransported, I would be making a terrible mistake. On their view, the person who wakes up would be a mere Replica of me. I That is a disagreement about personal identity. To under­ stand such disagreements, we must distinguish two kinds of sameness. Two white billiard balls may be qualitatively iden­ tical, or exactly similar. But they are not numerically ident- Some of this essay draws from Part Three of my Reasons and Persons (Oxford University Press, 1984). The new material will be more fully developed in my contribution to Dancy, Derek Parfit and His Critics: Vol. l. Persons (Blackwell's, forthcoming). 13 Derek Parfit ical, or one and the same ball. If I paint one of these balls red, it will cease to be qualitatively identical with itself as it was; but it will still be one and the same ball.
    [Show full text]
  • Susany. Soong Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern
    FILED 1 STEPHANIE M. HINDS (CABN 154284) Acting United States Attorney 2 Apr 15 2021 3 SUSANY. SOONG 4 CLERK, U.S. DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN FRANCISCO 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION 11 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) CASE NO. 3:21-cr-00153 VC ) 12 Plaintiff, ) VIOLATIONS: ) 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(j)(1) and 2 – Use of a Firearm in 13 v. ) Furtherance of a Crime of Violence Resulting in ) Death; 14 JONATHAN ESCOBAR, ) 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c)(1)(A) and 2 – Use/Carrying of a a/k/a “Wicked,” a/k/a “Rico,” and ) Firearm During and in Relation to a Crime of 15 JOSE AGUILAR, ) Violence; a/k/a “Slim” ) 18 U.S.C. § 924(d) and 28 U.S.C. § 2461(c) – 16 ) Forfeiture Allegation Defendants. ) 17 ) SAN FRANCISCO VENUE ) 18 ) UNDER SEAL ) 19 20 I N D I C T M E N T 21 The Grand Jury charges, with all dates being approximate and all date ranges being both 22 approximate and inclusive, and at all times relevant to this Indictment: 23 Introductory Allegations 24 1. The 19th Street Sureños gang was a predominantly Hispanic street gang that claimed the 25 area centered around 19th Street and Mission Street, in the Mission District of San Francisco, as its 26 territory or “turf.” The claimed territory included the area bounded by 19th Street to the South, 16th 27 Street to the North, Folsom Street to the East, and Dolores Street to the West.
    [Show full text]