DOCSLIB.ORG

Botulinum Toxin Type a Versus Oral Anticholinergic Medication Cost-Effectiveness for the Treatment of Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Botulinum Toxin Type a Versus Oral Anticholinergic Medication Cost-Effectiveness for the Treatment of Neurogenic Detrusor Overactivity Botulinum toxin type A versus oral anticholinergic medication cost-effectiveness for the treatment of neurogenic detrusor overactivity. Jose Carlos Truzzi1, Lessandro Curcio Gonçalves2, Romolo Guida Júnior3, Maira Libertad Soligo Takemoto4, Roberta Arinelli Fernandes4 Federal University of São Paulo1; Ipanema Hospital – Rio de Janeiro2; Hospital dos Servidores Públicos – Rio de Janeiro3; ANOVA4 Introduction/Aim of the study: Results: Detrusor overactivity and urinary incontinence figure as factors of significant Although Botulinum toxin type A was more costly, it was more effective when compared impairment of QOL in neurologic patients, besides can put them in risk of to oral anticholinergics within a ten-year period. (Figure 3 A and B) renal impairment. Oral anticholinergic (OA) medications are typically the fi rst line A 1.0000 approach with good subjective results.1 However persistence with oral anticholinergic 0.9000 therapy is low.2 Botulinum toxin injection into the detrusor muscle has been used for 0.8000 refractory cases, being its cost an important decision factor when deciding to change 0.7000 the former treatment. The aim of this study was to determine the cost-effectiveness of 0.6000 Botulinum Toxin type A (BT-A) vs. oral anticholinergic medications for the treatment 0.5000 0.4000 of neurogenic detrusor overactivity (NDO) from the public payer’s perspective. Probability 0.3000 0.2000 Material and Methods: 0.1000 0.0000 A Markov decision model was developed to compare the overall costs (in US dollars, 0 102030405060708090100110120 Months of follow-up USD) and effectiveness (persistent incontinence-free years) of oral anticholinergics BT-A OA and Botulinum Toxin type A injected into the detrusor. (Figure 1) B 120000000 100000000 W/BT-A WO/BT-A 1st line 2st line 80000000 anticholinergic BT-A anticholinergic 60000000 40000000 Annual cost (US$) Annual cost 20000000 0 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 st st st 1 line 2 line 3 line Figure 3 - A. Proportion of favorable outcome according to each treatment group. anticholinergic anticholinergic anticholinergic B. Annual cost follow-up of the neurogenic overactive bladder, Brazilian Public Health Care, 2011-2020 The persistent urinary incontinence-free period was estimated to be 7.3 and 3.0 years Figure 1 - Therapeutic sequences adopted in the Decision Model. for BT-A and oral medication, respectively. (Figure 4) Outcome BT-A OA The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as (Botulinum toxin type A cost – oral anticholinergic cost) / (Botulinum toxin type A incontinence-free Success years 9.2 3.3 years – oral anticholinergic incontinence-free years). A 10-year time frame with monthly cycle was designed based on data from a systematic review of clinical Incontinence-free years 9.9 3.9 and observational studies to simulate NDO patients’ long-term outcome. (Figure 2) Discounted success years 7.2 2.9 A one-way sensitivity analysis was performed. We applied a fi ve-percent annual discount to costs and benefi ts. Discounted Incontinence-free years 7.3 3.0 Figure 4 - Total of estimated outcome in each group. The incremental cumulative cost in 10 years was 1,707 USD, which represents a discounted monthly cost of 61 USD for BT-A and 46 USD for oral anticholinergic Success w/o Success w/o Success w/ Success w/ AE medication. (Figure 5) To achieve an additional one incontinence-free year, an annual AE Non- investment of 397 USD in BT-A would be needed, when compared to oral medication. AE Adherent AE Adherent Non-Adherent Adherent 70 Switching 60 50 40 Failure w/o Failure w/ Failure w/o Failure w/ AE 30 AE Non- AE Adherent AE Adherent Non-Adherent 20 Adherent (US$) Mensal cost 10 0 Persistent BT-A OA Incontinence Figure 5 - Mensal cost of treatment according to the strategy in use. Conclusion: Death Although BT-A is more costly, it was more effective than the oral anticholinergic treatment for NDO patients. Considering the high dropout rate with oral anticholinergics due to adverse events or the absence of an objective effective improvement, BT-A showed a higher projected effectiveness with an acceptable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). Only oral anthicolinergic patients can transit to state. References: Indicates that patients switch treatments in the original health state, not a transition. 1- Chapple et al. The Effects of Antimuscarinic Treatments in Overactive Bladder: An Update of a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Eur Urol. 2008; 54:543-562 2- Shaya FT et al. Persistence with overactive bladder pharmacotherapy in a Medicaid population. Am J Manag Figure 2 - Markov Model. Care. 2005; 11(4 Suppl):S121-9..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biological Toxins As the Potential Tools for Bioterrorism
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Biological Toxins as the Potential Tools for Bioterrorism Edyta Janik 1, Michal Ceremuga 2, Joanna Saluk-Bijak 1 and Michal Bijak 1,* 1 Department of General Biochemistry, Faculty of Biology and Environmental Protection, University of Lodz, Pomorska 141/143, 90-236 Lodz, Poland; [email protected] (E.J.); [email protected] (J.S.-B.) 2 CBRN Reconnaissance and Decontamination Department, Military Institute of Chemistry and Radiometry, Antoniego Chrusciela “Montera” 105, 00-910 Warsaw, Poland; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] or [email protected]; Tel.: +48-(0)426354336 Received: 3 February 2019; Accepted: 3 March 2019; Published: 8 March 2019 Abstract: Biological toxins are a heterogeneous group produced by living organisms. One dictionary defines them as “Chemicals produced by living organisms that have toxic properties for another organism”. Toxins are very attractive to terrorists for use in acts of bioterrorism. The first reason is that many biological toxins can be obtained very easily. Simple bacterial culturing systems and extraction equipment dedicated to plant toxins are cheap and easily available, and can even be constructed at home. Many toxins affect the nervous systems of mammals by interfering with the transmission of nerve impulses, which gives them their high potential in bioterrorist attacks. Others are responsible for blockage of main cellular metabolism, causing cellular death. Moreover, most toxins act very quickly and are lethal in low doses (LD50 < 25 mg/kg), which are very often lower than chemical warfare agents. For these reasons we decided to prepare this review paper which main aim is to present the high potential of biological toxins as factors of bioterrorism describing the general characteristics, mechanisms of action and treatment of most potent biological toxins.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Botulinum Neurotoxins for Enhanced Therapeutic Applications and Vaccine Development
    toxins Review Engineering Botulinum Neurotoxins for Enhanced Therapeutic Applications and Vaccine Development Christine Rasetti-Escargueil * and Michel R. Popoff Toxines Bacteriennes, Institut Pasteur, 75724 Paris, France; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) show increasing therapeutic applications ranging from treatment of locally paralyzed muscles to cosmetic benefits. At first, in the 1970s, BoNT was used for the treatment of strabismus, however, nowadays, BoNT has multiple medical applications including the treatment of muscle hyperactivity such as strabismus, dystonia, movement disorders, hemifacial spasm, essential tremor, tics, cervical dystonia, cerebral palsy, as well as secretory disorders (hyperhidrosis, sialorrhea) and pain syndromes such as chronic migraine. This review summarizes current knowledge related to engineering of botulinum toxins, with particular emphasis on their potential therapeutic applications for pain management and for retargeting to non-neuronal tissues. Advances in molecular biology have resulted in generating modified BoNTs with the potential to act in a variety of disorders, however, in addition to the modifications of well characterized toxinotypes, the diversity of the wild type BoNT toxinotypes or subtypes, provides the basis for innovative BoNT- based therapeutics and research tools. This expanding BoNT superfamily forms the foundation for new toxins candidates in a wider range of therapeutic options. Keywords: botulinum neurotoxin; Clostridium botulinum; therapeutic application; recombinant toxin; toxin engineering Key Contribution: Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) are the deadliest toxins with an increasing number of medical applications. The generation of modified BoNTs has provided innovative tools Citation: Rasetti-Escargueil, C.; Popoff, for specific medical applications. M.R. Engineering Botulinum Neuro- toxins for Enhanced Therapeutic Ap- plications and Vaccine Development.
    [Show full text]
  • Lllostridium Botulinum Neurotoxinl I H
    MICROBIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, Sept. 1980, p. 419-448 Vol. 44, No. 3 0146-0749/80/03-0419/30$0!)V/0 Lllostridium botulinum Neurotoxinl I H. WJGIYAMA Food Research Institute and Department ofBacteriology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin 53706 INTRODUCTION ........ .. 419 PATHOGENIC FORMS OF BOTULISM ........................................ 420 Food Poisoning ............................................ 420 Wound Botulism ............................................ 420 Infant Botulism ............................................ 420 CULTURES AND TOXIN TYPES ............................................ 422 Culture-Toxin Relationships ............................................ 422 Culture Groups ............................................ 422 GENETICS OF TOXIN PRODUCTION ......................................... 423 ASSAY OF TOXIN ............................................ 423 In Vivo Quantitation ............................................ 424 Infant-Potent Toxin ............................................ 424 Serological Assays ............................................ 424 TOXIC COMPLEXES ............................................ 425 Complexes 425 Structure of Complexes ...................................................... 425 Antigenicity and Reconstitution .......................... 426 Significance of Complexes .......................... 426 Nomenclature ........................ 427 NEUROTOXIN ..... 427 Molecular Weight ................... 427 Specific Toxicity ................... 428 Small Toxin ..................
    [Show full text]
  • Botulism Manual
    Preface This report, which updates handbooks issued in 1969, 1973, and 1979, reviews the epidemiology of botulism in the United States since 1899, the problems of clinical and laboratory diagnosis, and the current concepts of treatment. It was written in response to a need for a comprehensive and current working manual for epidemiologists, clinicians, and laboratory workers. We acknowledge the contributions in the preparation of this review of past and present physicians, veterinarians, and staff of the Foodborne and Diarrheal Diseases Branch, Division of Bacterial and Mycotic Diseases (DBMD), National Center for Infectious Diseases (NCID). The excellent review of Drs. K.F. Meyer and B. Eddie, "Fifty Years of Botulism in the United States,"1 is the source of all statistical information for 1899-1949. Data for 1950-1996 are derived from outbreaks reported to CDC. Suggested citation Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Botulism in the United States, 1899-1996. Handbook for Epidemiologists, Clinicians, and Laboratory Workers, Atlanta, GA. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1998. 1 Meyer KF, Eddie B. Fifty years of botulism in the U.S. and Canada. George Williams Hooper Foundation, University of California, San Francisco, 1950. 1 Dedication This handbook is dedicated to Dr. Charles Hatheway (1932-1998), who served as Chief of the National Botulism Surveillance and Reference Laboratory at CDC from 1975 to 1997. Dr. Hatheway devoted his professional life to the study of botulism; his depth of knowledge and scientific integrity were known worldwide. He was a true humanitarian and served as mentor and friend to countless epidemiologists, research scientists, students, and laboratory workers.
    [Show full text]
  • Α-LATROTOXIN and ITS RECEPTORS: Neurexins
    P1: FQP April 4, 2001 18:17 Annual Reviews AR121-30 Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2001. 24:933–62 Copyright c 2001 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved -LATROTOXIN AND ITS RECEPTORS: Neurexins and CIRL/Latrophilins ThomasCSudhof¨ Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Center for Basic Neuroscience, and the Department of Molecular Genetics, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Texas 75390-9111, e-mail: [email protected] Key Words neurotransmitter release, synaptic vesicles, exocytosis, membrane fusion, synaptic cell adhesion ■ Abstract -Latrotoxin, a potent neurotoxin from black widow spider venom, triggers synaptic vesicle exocytosis from presynaptic nerve terminals. -Latrotoxin is a large protein toxin (120 kDa) that contains 22 ankyrin repeats. In stimulating exocytosis, -latrotoxin binds to two distinct families of neuronal cell-surface receptors, neurexins and CLs (Cirl/latrophilins), which probably have a physiological function in synaptic cell adhesion. Binding of -latrotoxin to these receptors does not in itself trigger exocytosis but serves to recruit the toxin to the synapse. Receptor-bound -latrotoxin then inserts into the presynaptic plasma membrane to stimulate exocytosis by two dis- tinct transmitter-specific mechanisms. Exocytosis of classical neurotransmitters (glu- tamate, GABA, acetylcholine) is induced in a calcium-independent manner by a direct intracellular action of -latrotoxin, while exocytosis of catecholamines requires extra- cellular calcium. Elucidation of precisely how -latrotoxin works is likely to provide major insight into how synaptic vesicle exocytosis is regulated, and how the release machineries of classical and catecholaminergic neurotransmitters differ. by SCELC Trial on 09/09/11. For personal use only. INTRODUCTION Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 2001.24:933-962.
    [Show full text]
  • Botulinum Toxin Ricin Toxin Staph Enterotoxin B
    Botulinum Toxin Ricin Toxin Staph Enterotoxin B Source Source Source Clostridium botulinum, a large gram- Ricinus communis . seeds commonly called .Staphylococcus aureus, a gram-positive cocci positive, spore-forming, anaerobic castor beans bacillus Characteristics Characteristics .Appears as grape-like clusters on Characteristics .Toxin can be disseminated in the form of a Gram stain or as small off-white colonies .Grows anaerobically on Blood Agar and liquid, powder or mist on Blood Agar egg yolk plates .Toxin-producing and non-toxigenic strains Pathogenesis of S. aureus will appear morphologically Pathogenesis .A-chain inactivates ribosomes, identical interrupting protein synthesis .Toxin enters nerve terminals and blocks Pathogenesis release of acetylcholine, blocking .B-chain binds to carbohydrate receptors .Staphylococcus Enterotoxin B (SEB) is a neuro-transmission and resulting in on the cell surface and allows toxin superantigen. Toxin binds to human class muscle paralysis complex to enter cell II MHC molecules causing cytokine Toxicity release and system-wide inflammation Toxicity .Highly toxic by inhalation, ingestion Toxicity .Most lethal of all toxic natural substances and injection .Toxic by inhalation or ingestion .Groups A, B, E (rarely F) cause illness in .Less toxic by ingestion due to digestive humans activity and poor absorption Symptoms .Low dermal toxicity .4-10 h post-ingestion, 3-12 h post-inhalation Symptoms .Flu-like symptoms, fever, chills, .24-36 h (up to 3 d for wound botulism) Symptoms headache, myalgia .Progressive skeletal muscle weakness .18-24 h post exposure .Nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea .Symmetrical descending flaccid paralysis .Fever, cough, chest tightness, dyspnea, .Nonproductive cough, chest pain, .Can be confused with stroke, Guillain- cyanosis, gastroenteritis and necrosis; and dyspnea Barre syndrome or myasthenia gravis death in ~72 h .SEB can cause toxic shock syndrome + + + Gram stain Lipase on Ricin plant Castor beans S.
    [Show full text]
  • Botulinum Toxin – Mechanisms of Action and Clinical Use in Spasticity
    J Rehabil Med 2003; Suppl. 41: 56–59 BOTULINUM TOXIN – MECHANISMS OF ACTION AND CLINICAL USE IN SPASTICITY Michael Barnes From the Hunters Moor Regional Neurorehabilitation Centre, University of Newcastle upon Tyne, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK Botulinum toxin is a potent neurotoxin produced by the first to be produced commercially and is currently available bacterium Clostridium botulinum. There are seven sero- through two manufacturers – Ipsen (Dysport) and Allergan types, all of which block the release of acetylcholine from (Botox). More recently, botulinum toxin type B has been launched nerve endings, which gives the compound its theoretical in the States and across Europe (Elan Pharmaceuticals – base for reducing spasticity. Initial studies of the use of Neurobloc). At the present time the other serotypes are not com- botulinum toxin in the management of spasticity were mercially available although development work is taking place promising and now there are a number of well-designed, on type C and type F toxins. Obviously the adverse effects of double-blind, placebo-controlled studies that confirm the Clostridium botulinum have been known for many years and oc- place of botulinum toxin in our treatment armoury against casionally outbreaks of botulism still arise (1). focal spasticity. The studies have demonstrated both effi- cacy and safety. There is still more work to be done in terms of disability although early reports confirm functional MECHANISMS OF ACTION improvements, particularly reduction of pain as well as improvements in nursing care, hygiene and carer burden. The botulinum toxins are the most potent neurotoxins known to Further studies also need to be done to confirm the place man and have been investigated extensively over the last few of botulinum toxin in the overall context of other treat- decades, particularly in the context of the defence industry.
    [Show full text]
  • Skeletal Muscles in Chick Embryo (Cholinergic Receptor/Choline Acetyltransferase/Acetylcholinesterase/ Embryonic Development of Neuromuscular Junction) G
    Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 70, No. 6, pp. 1708-1712, June 1973 Effects of a Snake a-Neurotoxin on the Development of Innervated Skeletal Muscles in Chick Embryo (cholinergic receptor/choline acetyltransferase/acetylcholinesterase/ embryonic development of neuromuscular junction) G. GIACOBINI, G. FILOGAMO, M. WEBER, P. BOQUET, AND J. P. CHANGEUX Department of Human Anatomy, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; and Department of Molecular Biology, Institut Pasteur, Paris, France Communicated by Frankois Jacob, March 15, 1973 ABSTRACT The evolution of the cholinergic (nicotinic) The embryos were treated with a-toxin by three successive receptor in chick muscles is monitored during embryonic injections (the 3rd, 8th, and 12th day of incubation) in the yolk development with a tritiated a-neurotoxin from Naja nigri- collis and compared with the appearance of acetylcholines- sac with a Hamilton syringe, through a small window in the terase. The specific activity of these two proteins reaches a shell. Each time, 20-100 Al of a 1 mg/ml solution in sterile maximum around the 12th day of incubation. By contrast, Ringer's solution was injected. Embryos were examined the choline acetyltransferase reaches an early maximum of 16th day of incubation. About 30% of the injected embryos specific activity around the 7th day of development, and later continuously increases until hatching. Injection of died during development. a-toxin in the yolk sac at early stages ofdevelopment causes Homogenization. The tissue was added to ice-cold Ringer's an atrophy of skeletal and extrinsic ocular-muscles solution (for [3H ]a-toxin binding), to 0.5%O Triton X-100 in and of their innervation.
    [Show full text]
  • Botulinum Toxin
    Botulinum Toxin Chapter 14 BOTULINUM TOXIN ZYGMUNT F. DEMBEK, PhD, MS, MPH, LHD*; LEONARD A. SMITH, PhD†; FRANK J. LEBEDA, PhD‡; and JANICE M. RUSNAK, MD§ INTRODUCTION HISTORY DESCRIPTION OF THE AGENT Botulinum Neurotoxin Production PATHOGENESIS CLINICAL DISEASE DIAGNOSIS Diagnostic Assays in Botulism Foodborne Botulism Inhalation-acquired Botulism Other Forms of Botulism TREATMENT Antitoxin Clinically Relevant Signs of Bioterrorist Attack Preexposure and Postexposure Prophylaxis New Vaccine Research New Therapeutic Drug Research SUMMARY *Colonel (Retired), Medical Service Corps, US Army Reserve; Associate Professor, Department of Military and Emergency Medicine, Uniformed Ser- vices University of the Health Sciences, 4301 Jones Bridge Road, Bethesda, Maryland 20814; formerly, Chief, Biodefense Epidemiology and Education & Training Programs, Division of Medicine, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, 1425 Porter Street, Fort Detrick, Maryland †Senior Research Scientist (ST) for Medical Countermeasures Technology, Office of the Chief Scientist, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, 1425 Porter Street, Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702 ‡Acting Director and Chief Data Officer, Systems Biology Collaboration Center, US Army Center for Environmental Health Research, US Army Medi- cal Research and Materiel Command, 568 Doughten Drive, Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702; formerly, Civilian Deputy Director, Combat Casualty Care Research Program, US Army Medical Research and Materiel Command, 504 Scott Street, Fort Detrick, Maryland §Lieutenant Colonel (Retired), US Air Force; Medical Director, Battelle, 1564 Freedman Drive, Fort Detrick, Maryland 21702; formerly, Deputy Director of Special Immunizations Program, US Army Medical Research Institute of Infectious Diseases, 1425 Porter Street, Fort Detrick, Maryland A portion of this chapter has previously been published as: Dembek ZF, Smith LA, Rusnak JM.
    [Show full text]
  • Complex Gangliosides at the Neuromuscular Junction Are Membrane Receptors for Autoantibodies and Botulinum Neurotoxin but Redundant for Normal Synaptic Function
    The Journal of Neuroscience, August 15, 2002, 22(16):6876–6884 Complex Gangliosides at the Neuromuscular Junction Are Membrane Receptors for Autoantibodies and Botulinum Neurotoxin But Redundant for Normal Synaptic Function Roland W. M. Bullens,1,2 Graham M. O’Hanlon,3 Eric Wagner,3 Peter C. Molenaar,2 Keiko Furukawa,4 Koichi Furukawa,4 Jaap J. Plomp,1,2 and Hugh J. Willison3 Departments of 1Neurology and 2Physiology, Leiden University Medical Centre, 2300 RC, Leiden, The Netherlands, 3University Department of Neurology, Institute of Neurological Sciences, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow, G51 4TF, Scotland, and 4Department of Biochemistry II, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-0065, Japan One specialization of vertebrate presynaptic neuronal mem- conditions. In contrast, we show that they are membrane re- branes is their multifold enrichment in complex gangliosides, ceptors for both the paralytic botulinum neurotoxin type-A and suggesting that these sialoglycolipids may play a major func- human neuropathy-associated anti-ganglioside autoantibodies tional role in synaptic transmission. We tested this hypothesis that arise through molecular mimicry with microbial structures. directly by studying neuromuscular synapses of mice lacking These data prove the critical importance of complex ganglio- complex gangliosides attributable to deletion of the gene cod- sides in mediating pathophysiological events at the neuromus- ing for ␤1,4 GalNAc-transferase (GM2/GD2 synthase), which cular synapse. catalyzes an early step
    [Show full text]
  • Snake and Spider Toxins Induce a Rapid Recovery of Function of Botulinum Neurotoxin Paralysed Neuromuscular Junction
    Article Snake and Spider Toxins Induce a Rapid Recovery of Function of Botulinum Neurotoxin Paralysed Neuromuscular Junction Elisa Duregotti 1, Giulia Zanetti 1, Michele Scorzeto 1, Aram Megighian 1, Cesare Montecucco 1,2, Marco Pirazzini 1,* and Michela Rigoni 1,* Received: 23 October 2015; Accepted: 30 November 2015; Published: 8 December 2015 Academic Editor: Wolfgang Wüster 1 Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Padua, Via U. Bassi 58/B, 35131 Padova, Italy; [email protected] (E.D.); [email protected] (G.Z.); [email protected] (M.S.); [email protected] (A.M.); [email protected] (C.M.) 2 Institute for Neuroscience, National Research Council, Via U. Bassi 58/B, 35131 Padova, Italy * Correspondence: [email protected] (M.P.); [email protected] (M.R.); Tel.: +39-049-827-6057 (M.P.); +39-049-827-6077 (M.R.); Fax: +39-049-827-6049 (M.P. & M.R.) Abstract: Botulinum neurotoxins (BoNTs) and some animal neurotoxins (β-Bungarotoxin, β-Btx, from elapid snakes and α-Latrotoxin, α-Ltx, from black widow spiders) are pre-synaptic neurotoxins that paralyse motor axon terminals with similar clinical outcomes in patients. However, their mechanism of action is different, leading to a largely-different duration of neuromuscular junction (NMJ) blockade. BoNTs induce a long-lasting paralysis without nerve terminal degeneration acting via proteolytic cleavage of SNARE proteins, whereas animal neurotoxins cause an acute and complete degeneration of motor axon terminals, followed by a rapid recovery. In this study, the injection of animal neurotoxins in mice muscles previously paralyzed by BoNT/A or /B accelerates the recovery of neurotransmission, as assessed by electrophysiology and morphological analysis.
    [Show full text]
  • BOTOX® (Botulinum Toxin Type A)
    DRAFT LABEL 7/19/2004 1 2 BOTOX® (Botulinum Toxin Type A) Manufactured by: 3 Purified Neurotoxin complex Allergan Pharmaceuticals Ireland 4 a subsidiary of 5 Allergan, Inc., 2525 Dupont Drive, Irvine, CA 92612 6 DESCRIPTION: BOTOX® (Botulinum Toxin Type A) Purified Neurotoxin Complex is a sterile, 7 vacuum-dried purified botulinum toxin type A, produced from fermentation of Hall strain Clostridium 8 botulinum type A grown in a medium containing casein hydrolysate, glucose and yeast extract. It is 9 purified from the culture solution by dialysis and a series of acid precipitations to a complex 10 consisting of the neurotoxin, and several accessory proteins. The complex is dissolved in sterile 11 sodium chloride solution containing Albumin (Human) and is sterile filtered (0.2 microns) prior to 12 filling and vacuum-drying. ® 13 One Unit of BOTOX corresponds to the calculated median intraperitoneal lethal dose (LD50) in 14 mice. The method utilized for performing the assay is specific to Allergan’s product, BOTOX®. 15 Due to specific details of this assay such as the vehicle, dilution scheme and laboratory protocols for ® 16 the various mouse LD50 assays, Units of biological activity of BOTOX cannot be compared to nor 17 converted into Units of any other botulinum toxin or any toxin assessed with any other specific assay 18 method. Therefore, differences in species sensitivities to different botulinum neurotoxin serotypes 19 precludes extrapolation of animal-dose activity relationships to human dose estimates. The specific 20 activity of BOTOX® is approximately 20 Units/nanogram of neurotoxin protein complex. 21 Each vial of BOTOX® contains 100 Units (U) of Clostridium botulinum type A neurotoxin complex, 22 0.5 milligrams of Albumin (Human), and 0.9 milligrams of sodium chloride in a sterile, vacuum-dried 23 form without a preservative.
    [Show full text]