DOCSLIB.ORG

The Optimal Risk Management Framework Identifying the Requirements and Selecting the Framework

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

100635 Journal vol 1 2019_Layout 1 12/12/18 12:52 PM Page 40 FEATURE The Optimal Risk Management Framework Identifying the Requirements and Selecting the Framework The tremendous rise of cybersecurity attacks, have their own proprietary frameworks or use a coupled with organizations’ exploration of new hybrid of frameworks. Do you have something technologies such as artificial intelligence (AI) and to say about this blockchain to expand their business or better Selecting a Risk Management Method or article? secure their controls, gives cause to review the Framework foundational framework that is being used to Visit the Journal pages identify, assess and action IT risk impacting What criteria are firms using to select the frameworks of the ISACA® website business objectives. This is a perpetual struggle: they use? How often are these frameworks and their (www.isaca.org/journal), reviewing the use of new technologies and their basic tenets reviewed? Is the selected framework find the article and click communicated to the employees of the firm? Is the on the Comments link to impact to the organization’s objectives, profit framework or methodology selected by the firm share your thoughts. mentality and revenue streams. With Apple and Goldman reviewing the feasibility of issuing a new understood by all? Do these frameworks use https://bit.ly/2RCieXY credit card or the old news of Internet of Things quantitative factors or qualitative factors to evaluate (IoT) or driverless cars, enterprise risk and cyberrisk risk? Short of performing a scientific survey of departments or groups must be working overtime organizations to inventory and evaluate the to evaluate and drive the analysis of risk. Some commonly used risk methods, frameworks, their pros organizations have their own risk management and cons, and their methods of implementation, the frameworks that are modeled after COBIT®. Others National Cyber Security Centre, a part of Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ), an intelligence and security organization for the United Kingdom, summarized the commonly used risk methods and frameworks.1 ISACA’s Risk IT Framework Excerpt2 was referenced to understand the essentials of risk governance and the purpose and intended audience of the risk framework. Using the guidance from ISACA® and GCHQ can provide a reference point to determine the optimal framework and enablers to evaluate technology risk. What are several of the gaps in the frameworks that give one pause? Larry Marks, CISA, CRISC, CGEIT, CFE, CISSP, CSTE, ITIL, PMP Has focused his career on leading through collaboration to ensure best practices are implemented to assist compliance and process improvement. He has focused on audit, security, risk, compliance, privacy and program/project management across financial services, healthcare and telecommunications. Marks has extensive experience in designing, managing, auditing and implementing IT processes, policies, controls and technology. He has managed teams, priorities and expectations across business and IT leadership while delivering fit-for-purpose services. He is a peer reviewer for the ISACA® Journal and the Association of Certified Fraud Examiners’ (ACFE) Fraud Magazine. Marks is also associate editor for Information Security Journal: A Global Perspective, published by (ISC)2, and contributes book reviews to InfoSecurity Professional. Marks was recently selected to be a member of the Rutgers University Cyber Advisory Council (New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA). He has been a developer of ISACA® white papers and has authored/coauthored ISACA audit programs. He currently holds a leadership position in the ACFE New Jersey (USA) chapter. Marks is an active volunteer with ISACA, having recently served on its Ceritifed in Risk and Information Systems ControlTM (CRISCTM) Exam Writing Team and is part of the Project Management Institute’s ISO Committee. He is also a blogger and contributor to the leadership section of ProjectManagement.com. His work has been published in (ISC)2 Security Journal, PMI Journal and the ISACA Journal. 40 ISACA JOURNAL VOL 1 100635 Journal vol 1 2019_Layout 1 12/12/18 12:52 PM Page 41 Ensure the Selection Meets the Needs needed to tailor the implementation to the requirements of the business. The cost of To ensure that the risk management framework Enjoying these resources should be considered this article? meets the organization’s needs, the criteria shown along with the cost of purchasing the in figure 1 should be used. standards.4 • Read Getting Started with Risk Determine the Right Time to Use a Risk The risk IT principles used should be flexible Management. Method or Framework enough to adjust to current threats and risk and, www.isaca.org/ where possible, should provide the basis for the Management and risk assessors, along with the Getting-Started- practitioner to inventory the business-related and IT business, need to understand not only how, but With-Risk risk impacting the enterprise. when to use risk methods or frameworks. One • Learn more framework should cover all situations or should be about, discuss able to be customized to the current threats and Recommendations and collaborate vectors affecting cyber or IoT. Organizations are using the US National Institute of on risk Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity management International Organization for Standardization Framework to customize their assessment of ISACA’s Online (ISO)/International Electrotechnical Commission controls related to cyber or cloud to mitigate the Forums. (IEC) ISO/IEC 27005:2001 mentions, threats and other risk impacting the network assets https://engage. isaca.org/online Assessment and analysis is only effective or enterprise IT structure, COBIT, and other forums in situations where it can be used to obtain frameworks. The following assumptions are new information, in support of decision applicable: making and management, since the • Threat vectors, such as IoT, continue to challenge 3 scenario is knowable. business and security professionals alike on a methodology to respond. As a result, it is preferable that organizations use a • variety of different approaches. Skill sets to implement a framework may become immature. It is recommended that a risk framework, • One risk framework may not fit all firms or fit the assessment and supporting analysis be used to entire firm. help guide IT and the business in driving value to • the organization. It should help determine priorities A risk framework may fit some scenarios, but not and expectations. all scenarios. • NIST; Federal Financial Institutions Examination Costs and Prerequisites Council (FFIEC); and Operationally Critical Threat, Asset, and Vulnerability Evaluation (OCTAVE) Given the broad and generic nature of the have at their core, or reference, COBIT. guidance, specialist skilled resources are ISACA JOURNAL VOL 1 41 100635 Journal vol 1 2019_Layout 1 12/12/18 12:52 PM Page 42 • The risk framework has to be nimble, simple to • ISACA’s Risk IT principles5 should be followed: use, consistent and adaptable to different – Connect to the business objectives. scenarios. – Align the IT risk with enterprise risk management (ERM). • The design and implementation of the risk – Function as part of the daily activities. framework should be kept simple. – Establish tone at the top and accountability. • There may be licensing restrictions or limitations – Promote fair and open communication. on available resources to design and implement a – Balance the cost/benefit of IT risk. framework or keep its implementation evergreen. – Share risk with senior management. There • The threat to the organization may be too should be no separate silos of risk that may complex or inconsistent to be understood. not be communicated to employees. Accounting for these assumptions, practicable Conclusions recommendations follow. No matter the method, the basic elements of the framework should include Each risk management framework has its pros and 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 the following: cons, as illustrated in figures 2 and 3 . Practitioners should use the simplest framework • What is the risk? that meets their requirements and use common • Can the risk be evaluated on a quantitative or sense to ensure its proper implementation and qualitative basis? communication. There is no finite list of requirements. As organizations conduct their • The criteria for selection and implementation of periodic risk control assessments, they must ensure the framework should be understood by the that their selection meets their needs. Risk control business. assessments change over time. ISACA’s Risk IT • The business should be a partner in collaborating principles help the user determine the proper on how the risk or threat affects the people, framework and guide its implementation, processes or technology of the organization and communication and ensure that it remains in helping to prioritize the risk remediation evergreen. approach and strategy. Figure 2—Risk IT Principles • The strategy for implementing the framework should be simple and unscheduled. Connect to • Business The required resources and response to the risk Objectives must be proportionate and sustainable to the risk and threat. Function as Align IT Risk Part of Daily Management With ERM • Before an organization contacts a vendor Activities requesting a risk management product, the Risk IT objective for the product’s purchase, selection Principles and implementation should be approved by Establish senior management. There are too many vendors Tone at the
Recommended publications
  • Mitigate Cyber Attack Risk Solution Brief

    Mitigate Cyber Attack Risk Solution Brief

    SOLUTION BRIEF MITIGATE CYBER ATTACK RISK CONNECTING SECURITY, RISK MANAGEMENT & BUSINESS TEAMS TO MINIMIZE THE WIDESPREAD IMPACT OF A CYBER ATTACK DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION CREATES NEW RISKS As organizations extend technology deeper into their day-to-day business HIGH operations, their risk profiles evolve. DIGITAL RISK New digital risks—those unwanted and often unexpected outcomes that stem MEDIUM from digital transformation, digital business processes and the adoption RISK of related technologies—represent a LOW larger portion of potential obstacles to TRADITIONAL BUSINESS RISK achieving business objectives. While the digital technology creates new DIGITAL ADOPTION business opportunities, it frequently leads to higher levels of cybersecurity, FIGURE 1: Digital risk increasing the overall business risk as organizations embrace digital transformation. third-party, compliance and business resiliency risk. The impacts from these growing digital risks may be more disruptive than the operational risks that businesses have historically managed. In fact, many organizations are finding that as digital adoption accelerates, digital risk becomes the greatest facet of risk they face, especially growing cyber risks. AS ORGANIZATIONS EXPAND DIGITAL OPERATIONS, CYBER SECURITY RISKS MULTIPLY Organizations need to evolve to stay in front of rising cyber threats and their wide-reaching impact across increasingly digitized operations. Attackers continue to advance and use sophisticated techniques to infiltrate organizations which no longer have well defined perimeters. At the same time, responsibilities for detecting and responding to security It’s arguably impossible incidents are expanding beyond the security operations center (SOC). Business stakeholders continue to digitize their operations, elevating the risk and potential to prevent all cyber impact of cyber attacks.
  • Cybersecurity in a Digital Era.Pdf

    Cybersecurity in a Digital Era.Pdf

    Digital McKinsey and Global Risk Practice Cybersecurity in a Digital Era June 2020 Introduction Even before the advent of a global pandemic, executive teams faced a challenging and dynamic environ- ment as they sought to protect their institutions from cyberattack, without degrading their ability to innovate and extract value from technology investments. CISOs and their partners in business and IT functions have had to think through how to protect increasingly valuable digital assets, how to assess threats related to an increasingly fraught geopolitical environment, how to meet increasingly stringent customer and regulatory expectations and how to navigate disruptions to existing cybersecurity models as companies adopt agile development and cloud computing. We believe there are five areas for CIOs, CISOs, CROs and other business leaders to address in particular: 1. Get a strategy in place that will activate the organization. Even more than in the past cybersecurity is a business issue – and cybersecurity effectiveness means action not only from the CISO organiza- tion, but also from application development, infrastructure, product development, customer care, finance, human resources, procurement and risk. A successful cybersecurity strategy supports the business, highlights the actions required from across the enterprise – and perhaps most importantly captures the imagination of the executive in how it can manage risk and also enable business innovation. 2. Create granular, analytic risk management capabilities. There will always be more vulnerabilities to address and more protections you can consider than you will have capacity to implement. Even companies with large and increasing cybersecurity budgets face constraints in how much change the organization can absorb.
  • The Reputational Impact of It Risk

    The Reputational Impact of It Risk

    FALLOUT THE REPUTATIONAL IMPACT OF IT RISK IN ASSOCIATION WITH: CONTENTS Executive Summary ..............................................................................................................................................2 Introduction: The Black Friday data breach .................................................................................................3 Where the Risks Are: From Human Error to System Failure ................................................................ 5 Sidebar: The Promise and Perils of the Cloud............................................................................................11 Protecting Your Reputation in the Always-On World ............................................................................12 Conclusion ..............................................................................................................................................................18 Acknowledgments...............................................................................................................................................19 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY U.S. retailers were not the first to su!er a massive data breach. Nor will they be the last, as cyber attacks, security breaches and system outages proliferate. Shadow technology and expanding supply chains bring more risks. How can companies better protect their reputation by ensuring the continuous—and secure—flow of information to support their business? After all, a major part of the brand experience for most customers comes through the
  • Privacy As a Risk Management Challenge for Corporate Practice

    Privacy As a Risk Management Challenge for Corporate Practice

    Privacy as a Risk Management Challenge for Corporate Practice By Kathleen Greenaway, Susan Zabolotniuk and Avner Levin Research Assistance provided by Judit Langhammer, Colin Rogers and Melanie Torrie March 2012 This is a work in progress which will be updated frequently. It is not for public use, duplication, citation, linking or other reference without the express written permission of the authors. PRIVACY AND CYBER CRIME INSTITUTE Acknowledgements This project has been funded through the Contribution Program of the Office of the Federal Privacy Commissioner and in-kind contributions from the Office of the Dean of the Ted Page | 2 Rogers School of Management, Ryerson University. We are grateful to both organizations for supporting research into the privacy practices of Canadian organizations. We also thank the companies and privacy experts who gave of their time and lent their expertise to assist us with this study. It is reassuring to meet Canadian business people who value research sufficiently to participate in our project. Finally, we thank our student researchers, Judit Langhammer, Colin Rogers and Melanie Torrie for their enthusiastic and able assistance. Table of Contents Acknowledgements Page | 3 Introduction Privacy Risk Management in context Project Goals and Objectives Methodology Literature Review Academic LIT Practitioner LIT Regulatory LIT The Concept of STILL TO BE SORTED Privacy as a Risk Management Privacy Risk Discipline Privacy risk as operational risk Governance considerations & etc. PRM in action in STILL TO BE SORTED Canadian Organizations & etc. CONCLUSION Summary of Findings Recommendations Future Research REFERENCES APPENDICES Lit Review tables PRM – Review of available models Page | 4 Risk/RM in Guidance Documents Research protocols Introduction Privacy Risk Management in context Organizations appear to have entered a “third phase” in their approach to the provision of Page | 5 information privacy to their customers.
  • Cyber Benefits and Risks: Quantitatively Understanding and Forecasting the Balance

    Cyber Benefits and Risks: Quantitatively Understanding and Forecasting the Balance

    Cyber Benefits and Risks: Quantitatively Understanding and Forecasting the Balance Extended Project Report from the Frederick S. Pardee Center for International Futures Josef Korbel School of International Studies University of Denver www.pardee.du.edu September 2015 Barry B. Hughes, David Bohl, Mohammod Irfan, Eli Margolese-Malin, and José Solórzano In project collaboration with and the Table of Contents Executive Summary 4 Conceptualizing Benefits and Costs 4 Using the IFs System for Analysis 4 Background Research Foundations 5 Forecasts and Findings 9 Conclusion 11 A Final Note on Study Contributions 12 1. Introduction: Understanding and Anticipating Change in the Benefits and Costs of Cyber Technology 13 2. ICT and Cyber Development Indices 18 Indices Replicated in the IFs Forecasting System 18 ICT Development Index 18 Global Cybersecurity Index 19 Additional Indices of Importance in Cyber Security Analyses 21 Digitization Index 21 Digital Economy Ranking Index 21 Networked Readiness Index 22 3. Benefits 23 Competing Schools of Thought on Economic Benefits 23 Pessimism Versus optimism concerning ICT’s economic production impacts 23 ICT as a general-purpose technology 25 ICT’s Economic Impact: The Production Side 26 ICT as a growth sector in the economy 26 ICT investment and capital services 29 ICT and multifactor productivity 32 Comparing the Productivity Impacts of GPTs: Steam, Electricity, ICT 33 Variation in ICT Impact across Time/Pervasiveness and Countries 36 Drivers of variation in ICT impact: ICT (especially broadband) pervasiveness 36 Drivers of variable ICT impact: Beyond PCs and broadband 39 Drivers of variable ICT impact: Country development level 41 Consumer Surplus 42 Consumer surplus forecasts 46 Summary of Knowledge Concerning Cyber Risk Benefits: Modeling Implications 47 4.
  • Guide to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: IT Risks and Controls (Second Edition)

    Guide to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: IT Risks and Controls (Second Edition)

    1. FPO Guide to the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: IT Risks and Controls Second Edition Table of Contents Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1 Overall IT Risk and Control Approach and Considerations When Complying with Sarbanes-Oxley .... 2 1. Is there an overall approach to IT risk and control consideration that should be followed? .......................... 2 2. Why is it so important to consider IT when evaluating internal control over financial reporting? ............... 4 3. How should Section 404 compliance teams define “IT risks and controls”? .................................................. 5 4. How does management identify and prioritize IT risks? ................................................................................. 5 5. What guidance does COSO provide with respect to IT controls? .................................................................. 6 6. What guidance is provided by the Information Systems Audit and Control Association’s (ISACA) Control Objectives for Information and Related Technologies (COBIT) framework with respect to IT controls? ........................................................................................................... 6 7. How do COSO and COBIT facilitate a Section 404 compliance effort? ........................................................ 6 8. If a Section 404 project strictly and only follows COBIT, will the project be compliant with the Section 404 compliance efforts? .......................................................................................................................
  • Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems

    Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems

    Special Publication 800-30 Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Gary Stoneburner, Alice Goguen, and Alexis Feringa NIST Special Publication 800-30 Risk Management Guide for Information Technology Systems Recommendations of the National Institute of Standards and Technology Gary Stoneburner, Alice Goguen1, and 1 Alexis Feringa C O M P U T E R S E C U R I T Y Computer Security Division Information Technology Laboratory National Institute of Standards and Technology Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8930 1Booz Allen Hamilton Inc. 3190 Fairview Park Drive Falls Church, VA 22042 July 2002 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Donald L. Evans, Secretary TECHNOLOGY ADMINISTRATION Phillip J. Bond, Under Secretary for Technology NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF STANDARDS AND TECHNOLOGY Arden L. Bement, Jr., Director SP 800-30 Page ii Reports on Computer Systems Technology The Information Technology Laboratory (ITL) at the National Institute of Standards and Technology promotes the U.S. economy and public welfare by providing technical leadership for the nation’s measurement and standards infrastructure. ITL develops tests, test methods, reference data, proof-of- concept implementations, and technical analyses to advance the development and productive use of information technology. ITL’s responsibilities include the development of technical, physical, administrative, and management standards and guidelines for the cost-effective security and privacy of sensitive unclassified information in federal computer systems. The Special Publication 800-series reports on ITL’s research, guidance, and outreach efforts in computer security, and its collaborative activities with industry, government, and academic organizations. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 800-30 Natl.
  • Guide to Conducting Cybersecurity Risk Assessment for Critical Information Infrastructure December 2019 Contents

    Guide to Conducting Cybersecurity Risk Assessment for Critical Information Infrastructure December 2019 Contents

    GUIDE TO CONDUCTING CYBERSECURITY RISK ASSESSMENT FOR CRITICAL INFORMATION INFRASTRUCTURE DECEMBER 2019 CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Importance of Cybersecurity Risk Assessment ........................................................................... 2 1.2 Common Problems Observed ........................................................................................................... 2 2 PURPOSE, AUDIENCE & SCOPE ....................................................................................... 4 2.1 Purpose of Document .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Audience & Scope ................................................................................................................................. 4 3 ESTABLISH RISK CONTEXT ............................................................................................... 5 3.1 Define Risk ................................................................................................................................................ 5 3.2 Determine Risk Tolerance ................................................................................................................... 6 3.3 Define Roles and Responsibilities .................................................................................................... 7 4 CONDUCT RISK ASSESSMENT ........................................................................................
  • Ten Key Questions on Cyber Risk and Cyber Risk Insurance the GENEVA ASSOCIATION

    Ten Key Questions on Cyber Risk and Cyber Risk Insurance the GENEVA ASSOCIATION

    Ten Key Questions on Cyber Risk and Cyber Risk Insurance THE GENEVA ASSOCIATION November 2016 The Geneva Association The Geneva Association is the leading international insurance think tank for strategically important insurance and risk management issues. The Geneva Association identifies fundamental trends and strategic issues where insurance plays a substantial role or which influence the insurance sector. Through the development of research programmes, regular publications and the organisation of international meetings, The Geneva Association serves as a catalyst for progress in the understanding of risk and insurance matters and acts as an information creator and disseminator. It is the leading voice of the largest insurance groups worldwide in the dialogue with international institutions. In parallel, it advances— in economic and cultural terms—the development and application of risk management and the understanding of uncertainty in the modern economy. The Geneva Association membership comprises a statutory maximum of 90 chief executive of officers (CEOs) from the world’s top insurance and reinsurance companies. It organises international expert networks and manages discussion platforms for senior insurance executives and specialists as well as policymakers, regulators and multilateral organisations. Established in 1973, The Geneva Association, officially the ‘International Association for the Study of Insurance Economics’, is based in Zurich, Switzerland and is a non-profit organisation funded by its Members. 2 www.genevaassociation.org
  • GTAG 1: Information Technology Controls

    GTAG 1: Information Technology Controls

    Information Technology ControlsA uditing Application Controls Authors David A. Richards, CIA, President, The IIA Alan S. Oliphant, MIIA, QiCA, MAIR InternationalChristine Bellino, Jefferson Wells Charles H. Le Grand, CIA, CHL GlobalSteve Hunt, Enterprise Controls Consulting LP July 200March 20057 Copyright © 20057 by The Institute of Internal Auditors (IIA), 247 Maitland Ave., Altamonte Springs, FL 32701-4201 USA. All rights reserved. Printed in the United States of America. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form by any means — electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise — without prior written permission from the publisher. The IIA publishes this document for informational and educational purposes. This document is intended to provide information, but is not a substitute for legal or accounting advice. The IIA does not provide such advice and makes no warranty as to any legal or accounting results through its publication of this document. When legal or accounting issues arise, professional assistance should be sought and retained. GTAG — Table of Contents: Section 1 Section 19 Letter from the President..........................................ii Appendix H – CAE Checklist ................................423 Section 2 Section 20 IT Controls – Executive Summary ............................iii Appendix I – References ........................................445 Section 3 Section 21 Introduction ..........................................................1 Appendix
  • IT Risk Assessment – a Practical Holistic Approach

    IT Risk Assessment – a Practical Holistic Approach

    BAKER TILLY AND ACUA WEBINAR IT risk assessment – a practical holistic approach The information provided here is of a general nature and is not intended to address the specific circumstances of any individual or entity. In specific circumstances, the services of a professional should be sought. Tax information, if any, contained in this communication was not intended or written to be used by any person for the purpose of avoiding penalties, nor should such information be construed as an opinion upon which any person may rely. The intended recipients of this communication and any attachments are not subject to any limitation on the disclosure of the tax treatment or tax structure of any transaction or matter that is the subject of this communication and any attachments. Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP trading as Baker Tilly is a member of the global network of Baker Tilly International Ltd., the members of which are separate and independent legal entities. © 2019 Baker Tilly Virchow Krause, LLP 1 INTRODUCTIONS Today’s webinar moderator Amy Hughes ACUA Distance Learning Director Director of Internal Audit Michigan Technological University 2 INTRODUCTIONS GoToWebinar guide — Everyone is muted to avoid background noise. — Asking questions: Ask questions by clicking on the Questions panel on the right side of your screen, type your question and submit to all organizers. — If disconnected: If audio is disconnected, click on the Audio panel on the right side of your screen, or refer back to your e-mail for the dial-in number. — Support #: If you have any technical problems, call GoToWebinar support at 1 888 646 0014.
  • Effects of IT Governance Measures on Cyber-Attack Incidents

    Effects of IT Governance Measures on Cyber-Attack Incidents

    The International Journal of Business Management and Technology, Volume 3 Issue 1 January - February 2019 ISSN: 2581-3889 Research Article Open Access Effects of IT Governance Measures on Cyber-attack Incidents Nick J. Rezaee, Student University of California, Santa Cruz 1156 High Street Santa Cruz, CA 95064, Kingsley O. Olibe, PhD Department of Accounting College of Business Administration Kansas State University Manhattan, KS 66506-0113 Zabihollah Rezaee* PhD, CPA, CMA, CIA, CGFM, CFE, CSOXP, CGRCP, CGOVP, CGMA, CRMA Thompson-Hill Chair of Excellence & Professor of Accountancy Fogelman College of Business and Economics 300 Fogelman College Admin. Building The University of Memphis Memphis, TN 38152-3120 ABSTRACT: Growing incidents of cyber hacking and security breaches of information systems (e.g., Sony, Target, JPMorgan Chase, Home Depot, Cathay Pacific Airlines) threaten the sustainability of many firms and costs the U.S. economy more than $100 billion annually. Business organizations should take these threats seriously and improve their Information Technology (IT) governance and compliance, and cybersecurity risk assessment and controls to effectively prevent cyber hacking and cybersecurity breaches. The existence and persistence of cyber-attacks has elevated expectations for boards of directors to exert greater risk and compliance oversight and for executives to develop and implement managerial strategies for risk management processes to combat cyber-attacks. This paper examines the importance and relevance of IT governance measures including the board oversight function and managerial risk assessment strategies in preventing cyber-attacks. This paper provides policy, practical and research implications. Keywords: Cybersecurity; IT Governance; Board Oversight; Risk Assessment and management; IT investment and budget.