The Fintech Book Paint a Visual Picture of the Possibilities and Make It Real for Every Reader
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
We Can Go Anywhere': Understanding Independence Through a Case Study
‘We can go anywhere’: Understanding independence through a case study of ride-hailing use by people with visual impairments in metropolitan India VAISHNAV KAMESWARAN, University of Michigan JATIN GUPTA, University of Michigan JOYOJEET PAL, University of Michigan SILE O’MODHRAIN, University of Michigan TIFFANY C. VEINOT, University of Michigan ROBIN N. BREWER, University of Michigan AAKANKSHA PARAMESHWAR, University of Michigan VIDHYA Y, Microsoft Research India JACKI O’NEILL, Microsoft Research India Ride-hailing services have received attention as part of the growing work around the sharing economy, but the focus of these studies has largely been on drivers. In this paper, we examine how ride-hailing is transforming the transportation practices of one group of passengers - people with visual impairments in metropolitan India. Through a qualitative study consisting of interviews and observations, we examined the use and impact of these services on our target population, who otherwise contend with chaotic, unreliable, and largely inaccessible modes of transportation. We found that ride-hailing services positively affects participants’ notions of independence, and we tease out how independence for our participants is not just about ‘doing things alone, without help’ but is also situated, social and relative. Furthermore, we show how accessibility, in the case of ride-hailing in India, is a socio-technical and collaborative achievement, involving interactions between the passenger, the driver, and the technology. CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → Empirical studies in accessibility; 85 Additional Key Words and Phrases: Accessibility, social accessibility, collaborative accessibility, independence, stigma, social interactions, ridesharing, Uber, Ola, blind users ACM Reference Format: Vaishnav Kameswaran, Jatin Gupta, Joyojeet Pal, Sile O’Modhrain, Tiffany C. -
Ws2018-Transportation-Services-21St
Just what do we actually know about household spending on transportation services and how are they changing in the 21st Century? Jonathan R. Peters, Ph.D. The College of Staten Island & The CUNY Graduate School David A. King, Ph.D. Arizona State University Cameron E. Gordon, Ph.D. University of Canberra Nora Tabori Santiago, MUA The CUNY High Performance Computing Center Bureau of Labor Statistics 2018 Consumer Expenditure Surveys (CE) Microdata Users’ Workshop Washington, DC July 20, 2018 How did we (Transportation Finance Folks & Urban Planners) wind up here at the BLS? Part III (2014, 2017 & 2018) Why are we interested in tracking the cost of transport services and fees? The Changing US Portfolio of Travel • Look at aspects of travel costs that are changing. • How are these costs reflected in the CEX? • How are these cost measured through other methods? • How are these costs spread across income groups? • How can we plan to measure future costs? Ola Cabs - India Sidecar - DOA Uber Trips Origins in “New York” – From Uber Data Obtained From Uber by NYC Taxi and Limousine Commission for April – October 2014 US Households Without a Vehicle Rank City % car-free 1 New York City 56% 2 Washington, DC 38% 3 Boston 37% 4 Philadelphia 33% 5 San Francisco 31% 6 Baltimore 31% 7 Chicago 28% 8 Detroit 26% U.S. Average = 9.22% Household Modes of Travel • Private Automobile • Shared Vehicle – Carpool / Fampool • Shared Vehicle – Taxi, Jitney, Lyft, Uber • Walking • Bicycle • Mass Transit – Commuter Rail, Metro, Bus, Ferry • Air Travel • Non-Travel – Online Shopping / Video Meetings • And Lodging - AirBNB versus Hotels Changing Households • Households used to travel a lot to get goods and services. -
Interviewed Bernard L. Madoffat the Metropolitan Correctional Center, 150 Park Row, New York, NY
This document contains information that has been collected in connection with an investigation conducted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Office of Inspector General (OIG). It contains confidential, privileged and sensitive information and should not be recopied or distributed without the express consent of the GIG. Interview of Bernard L. Madoff At approximately 3:00pm on June 17, 2009, Inspector General H. David Kotz and DeputyInspector General Noelle Frangipaneinterviewed Bernard L. Madoffat the Metropolitan Correctional Center, 150 Park Row, New York, NY. Madoff was accompanied by his attorney, Ira Lee Sorkin of the firm of Dickstein Shapiro, LLP, as well as an associate from that firm, Nicole DeBello. The interview began with IG Kotz advising Madoff of the general nature of the OIG investigation, and advising that we were investigating interactions the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) had with Madoff and his firm, Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities, LLP (BLM), going back to 1992. At that point, Sorkin advised Madoff that his only obligation was to tell the truth during the interview. The interview began with Madoff stating that the prosecutor and trustee in the criminal case "misunderstood" things he said during the proffer, and as a result, there is a lot of misinformation being circulated about this scandal, however, he added, "I'm not saying I'm not guilty." 2006 Exam: Madoff recalled that with respect to the 2006 OCIE exam, "two young fellows," (Lamore and Ostrow) came in "under the guise of doing a routine exam;" He said that during that time period, sweeps were being done of hedge funds that focused on ~-ont- running, and that was why he believed Ostrow and Lamore were at BLM. -
Signals in Equity-Based Crowdfunding and Risk of Failure
Reichenbach and Walther Financ Innov (2021) 7:54 https://doi.org/10.1186/s40854‑021‑00270‑0 Financial Innovation RESEARCH Open Access Signals in equity‑based crowdfunding and risk of failure Felix Reichenbach and Martin Walther* *Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract Chair of Finance This study investigates signal validity in equity-based crowdfunding by examining and Investment, Technische Universität Berlin, Sec. H whether signals that increase crowd participation are associated with higher post- 64, Straße des 17. Juni 135, ofering success. Post-ofering success is measured as the probability of survival. We 10623 Berlin, Germany use a hand-collected data set of 88 campaigns with over 64,000 investments and 742 updates from a well-established and leading German equity-based crowdfunding platform, Companisto. We fnd that indicating that the chief executive ofcer holds a university degree and a higher number of business-related updates are associated with a lower risk of failure, which is in line with recent research on ofering success. The number of updates on external certifcation, promotions, and the team is associated with a higher risk of failure. In contrast to recent fndings on ofering success, we fnd that the equity share ofered is positively related to post-ofering success, whereas a high number of large investments or updates on campaign development are accom- panied by a higher probability of failure. Our results provide guidance for entrepre- neurs and investors regarding which signals are worth sending or using. Furthermore, these results suggest that investors are partly using wrong signals and challenge the rationality and wisdom of the crowd. -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT of NEW YORK ------X
Case 1:09-cr-00213-DC Document 230 Filed 06/04/20 Page 1 of 16 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : - v - : MEMORANDUM DECISION BERNARD L. MADOFF, : 09 Cr. 213 (DC) Defendant. : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x APPEARANCES: BRANDON SAMPLE PLC Attorney for Defendant By: Brandon Sample, Esq. P.O. Box 250 Rutland, VT 05702 AUDREY STRAUSS, Esq. Attorney for the United States, Acting Under Authority Conferred by 28 U.S.C. § 515 By: Drew Skinner, Esq. Louis A. Pellegrino, Esq. Assistant United States Attorneys One St. Andrews Plaza New York, NY 10007 CHIN, Circuit Judge: On March 12, 2009, defendant Bernard L. Madoff pleaded guilty to 11 counts of securities fraud and related crimes. On June 29, 2009, I sentenced him to a term of imprisonment of 150 years. Mr. Madoff now moves for a reduction in sentence and "compassionate release" pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A), as modified by the First Step Act (the "FSA"), Pub. L. No. 115-391, 132 Stat. 5194 (Dec. 21, 2018). He Case 1:09-cr-00213-DC Document 230 Filed 06/04/20 Page 2 of 16 contends that he suffers from "end-stage renal disease" and other serious medical conditions and that, as a consequence, he has a life expectancy of less than 18 months. Def. Motion at 2-3. Accordingly, he asks that the Court show him "mercy and compassion" and release him so that he is not incarcerated for "his final months on this earth." Id. at 25, 26. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied. -
Crowd Involvement in CHEST: Insights and Recommendations for Crowdsourcing in Innovative Funding Schemes and Successful Crowdfunding of Digital Social Innovations
Crowd involvement in CHEST: Insights and recommendations for crowdsourcing in innovative funding schemes and successful crowdfunding of Digital Social Innovations 1 Table of Content 1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 3 2 Crowdsourcing Digital Social Innovation in CHEST .......................................................................... 4 2.1 CHEST open call design and results ......................................................................................... 4 2.2 Community engagement supporting idea generation ............................................................ 6 2.3 CHEST CrowdMonitor: Crowd evaluation of beneficiaries ..................................................... 9 3 Crowdfunding ................................................................................................................................ 10 3.1 Types of crowdfunding .......................................................................................................... 10 3.2 Overview of crowdfunding market and platforms ................................................................ 12 3.3 Factors of success .................................................................................................................. 15 3.4 Guidelines for planning and implementing a successful crowdfunding campaign for DSI ... 15 3.4.1 Step 1: Decide if crowdfunding is appropriate for your project .................................. -
Heuristics & Cognitive Biases
McCombs Knowledge To Go November 11, 2014 Corporate Governance and Corporate Fraud by Grace Renbarger Lecturer, Department of Business, Government and Society Agenda . What is Corporate Fraud? . What are the Consequences? . How Big is the Problem? . Who Commits Corporate Fraud? . Why do People Engage in Fraud? . How can Fraud be Prevented? . What is the Role of Corporate Governance in Preventing Corporate Fraud? What is “Corporate Fraud”? What is “Corporate Fraud”? . Concept of “fraud” is very broad . Legal Definition: A false representation of a matter of fact—whether by words or by conduct, by false or misleading statements, or by concealment of what should have been disclosed—that deceives and is intended to deceive another so that the individual will act upon it to his or her legal injury. Type of “White Collar” crime . Usually committed for personal or institutional gain. What is “Corporate Fraud”? . Occurs in wide variety of ways: . theft of cash, physical assets or confidential information . misuse of accounts . procurement fraud . payroll fraud . financial accounting misstatements . inappropriate journal vouchers . suspense accounting fraud . fraudulent expense claims . false employment credentials . bribery and corruption . money laundering . Can be committed by individuals employed by the corporation (internal) or by outsiders (external) . Victims can be the corporation itself or others (e.g., investors) What is “Corporate Fraud”? Focus today is on internal fraud Source: Chartered Institute of Management Accountants Consequences of Fraud . Criminal liability . Securities fraud . Insider trading . Tax evasion . Racketeering/RICO . Mail and wire fraud . Bribery . Money laundering . Obstruction of justice Consequences of Fraud . Individual officers, employees and agents criminally prosecuted for their own conduct . -
Wirecard and Klarna Launch Joint Payment Solution for Merchants
Wirecard and Klarna launch joint payment solution for merchants ● Wirecard embeds all three Klarna payment methods into merchants’ checkout – via a single integration – and processes all payments ● Solution currently available in nine countries, with more geographies coming in 2020 Munich/Stockholm - 12th of March 2020 - Wirecard, the global innovation leader for digital financial technology, and Klarna, a leading global payments and shopping provider, announced today the launch of a new enhanced joint payment solution. All three Klarna shopping methods, Pay Now, Pay Later and Klarna Financing, can now be embedded into merchants’ checkout via a single integration through the Wirecard digital financial commerce platform to boost average order value, conversions and hence fuel growth for merchants. As the single point of contact for merchants, Wirecard ensures that Klarna is integrated easily into the merchants’ checkout page as a payment option and also processes all subsequent payments made via Klarna. Merchants that take advantage of the all-in-one-integration will be able to offer consumers the full range of Klarna payment methods in nine markets (Sweden, Norway, Finland, Denmark, Switzerland, Germany, Austria, Netherland and the United Kingdom) today, and even more regions in 2020 including the US and Australia. In addition, Wirecard and Klarna cover the merchant and consumer risk respectively, meaning that the payments are guaranteed. Through the cooperation, Wirecard and Klarna will be complementing each other’s services, while growing Klarna’s potential merchant base and global consumer brand. Shoppers will continue to enjoy a smooth, hassle-free checkout experience when paying via Klarna. “We are proud to team up with Wirecard to combine the best of our offerings into a single solution,” said Luke Griffiths, Commercial Vice President at Klarna. -
Amazon Payment Method Invoice
Amazon Payment Method Invoice If undescendable or loving Nico usually grinned his roubles sabotaging fiercely or miauls inextricably and capaciously, how faced is Ferdinand? Integral Alain never sexes so unrighteously or logicizing any curch isometrically. Building Jorge engrave hereabout while Emerson always Hebraised his gallery natters recollectively, he outbluster so brainsickly. Sales and Billing FAQs ON1 Support. Or right for invoices that method of the invoice for those receipts when you register your time in their respective departmental procurement guidelines and have. Use stream by Invoice at Amazon Business to customize. How till I foster an extra $1000 a month? Enabling Amazon Pay Shopify Help Center. Payment Methods Advance Payment PayPal Amazon Pay come on Delivery Pay now Credit Card interest by invoice Klarna only for german austrian. Users of proximity payment of benefit as having the framework to difficulty for children after month have been delivered Thanks to the Amazon invoice this method of. AMS Billing error Advise however please KBoards. Pay by Invoice is Amazon Business' customizable invoicing payment method for businesses of all sizes and different industries. Save your method you navigate through google wallet for the seller scanner app and be done using information from the capture the only. Consider evidence with Google Checkout Paypal or Amazon Payments. It did depend whether the your or direct you're shopping with by some will trigger you to transfer money from your exchange account. How people enter merchant fees and orders from Amazon. Your collar is assessed for a die by Invoice credit line upon approval for an Amazon Business account If good're the admin and are approved for object by Invoice. -
MOBILE Payments Market Guide 2013
MOBILE PAYMENTS MARKET GUIDE 2013 INSIGHTS IN THE WORLDWIDE MOBILE TRANSACTION SERVICES ECOSYSTEM OVER 350 COMPANIES WORLDWIDE INSIDE Extensive global distribution via worldwide industry events As the mobile payments ecosystem is becoming increasingly more crowded and competitive, the roles of established and new players in the mobile market is shifting, with new opportunities and challenges facing each category of service providers. Efma, the global organization that brings together more than 3,300 retail financial services companies from over 130 countries, welcomes the publication of the Mobile Payments Market Guide 2013 by The Paypers as a valuable source of information and guidance for all actors in the mobile transaction services space. Patrick Desmarès - CEO, Efma MOBILE PAYMENTS MARKET GUIDE 2013 INSIGHTS IN THE WORLDWIDE MOBILE TRANSACTION SERVICES ECOSYSTEM Authors Ionela Barbuta Sabina Dobrean Monica Gaza Mihaela Mihaila Adriana Screpnic RELEASE | VERSION 1.0 | APRIL 2013 | COPYRIGHT © THE Paypers BV | ALL RIGHTS reserved 2 MOBILE PAYMENTS MARKET GUIDE 2013 INTRODUCTION Introduction You are reading the Mobile Payments Market Guide 2013, a state- se and the way commerce is done. From a quick and accessible of-the-art overview of the global mobile transaction services channel for banking on the move to a sophisticated tool for shop- ecosystem and the most complete and up-to-date reference ping, price comparison and buying, the saga of the mobile device source for mobile payments, mobile commerce and mobile is an on-going story that unfolds in leaps and bounds within a banking-related information at global level. This guide is published progressively crowded (and potentially fragmented) ecosystem. -
Paypal Holdings, Inc
PAYPAL HOLDINGS, INC. (NASDAQ: PYPL) Second Quarter 2021 Results San Jose, California, July 28, 2021 Q2’21: TPV reaches $311 billion with more than 400 million active accounts • Total Payment Volume (TPV) of $311 billion, growing 40%, and 36% on an FX-neutral basis (FXN); net revenue of $6.24 billion, growing 19%, and 17% on an FXN basis • GAAP EPS of $1.00 compared to $1.29 in Q2’20, and non-GAAP EPS of $1.15 compared to $1.07 in Q2’20 • 11.4 million Net New Active Accounts (NNAs) added; ended the quarter with 403 million active accounts FY’21: Raising TPV and reaffirming full year revenue outlook • TPV growth now expected to be in the range of ~33%-35% at current spot rates and on an FXN basis; net revenue expected to grow ~20% at current spot rates and ~18.5% on an FXN basis, to ~$25.75 billion • GAAP EPS expected to be ~$3.49 compared to $3.54 in FY’20; non-GAAP EPS expected to grow ~21% to ~$4.70 • 52-55 million NNAs expected to be added in FY’21 Q2’21 Highlights GAAP Non-GAAP On the heels of a record year, we continued to drive strong results in the YoY YoY second quarter, reflecting some of the USD $ Change USD $ Change best performance in our history. Our platform now supports 403 million Net Revenues $6.24B 17%* $6.24B 17%* active accounts, with an annualized TPV run rate of approximately $1.25 trillion. Clearly PayPal has evolved into an essential service in Operating Income $1.13B 19% $1.65B 11% the emerging digital economy.” Dan Schulman EPS $1.00 (23%) $1.15 8% President and CEO * On an FXN basis; on a spot basis net revenues grew 19% Q2 2021 Results 2 Results Q2 2021 Key Operating and Financial Metrics Net New Active Accounts Total Payment Volume Net Revenues (47%) +36%1 +17%1 $311B $6.24B 21.3M $5.26B $222B 11.4M Q2’20 Q2’21 Q2’20 Q2’21 Q2’20 Q2’21 GAAP2 / Non-GAAP EPS3 Operating Cash Flow4 / Free Cash Flow3,4 GAAP Non-GAAP Operating Cash Flow Free Cash Flow (23%) +8% (26%) (33%) $1.29 $1.77B $1.15 $1.58B $1.07 $1.00 $1.31B $1.06B Q2’20 Q2’21 Q2’20 Q2’21 Q2’20 Q2’21 Q2’20 Q2’21 1. -
The Internet of Garbage
1 The Internet of Garbage © 2015, 2018 by Sarah Jeong Cover and Illustrations by William Joel for The Verge, © 2018 Vox Media, Inc. All rights reserved. The Verge Edition 1.5 August 2018 Published by Vox Media, Inc. www.theverge.com ISBN: 978-0-692-18121-8 2 Table of Contents Preface ............................................... 4 Chapter One: The Internet Is Garbage .................. 6 A Theory of Garbage .......................................... 8 Spam as Garbage .............................................. 9 Chapter Two: On Harassment ........................... 12 Harassment in the News ...................................... 13 About That Media Narrative . ............................ 18 Is Harassment Gendered? ..................................... 20 Intersections of Harassment ................................. 21 On Doxing ................................................... 24 SWATting .................................................... 27 Doxing Women ................................................ 28 Concluding Thoughts on Doxing ............................... 30 A Taxonomy of Harassment .................................... 32 On Modern-Day Social Media Content Moderation ............... 35 What Happens Before: Setting Norms .......................... 38 Chapter Three: Lessons from Copyright Law ............ 40 The Intersection of Copyright and Harassment ................ 41 How the DMCA Taught Us All the Wrong Lessons ................ 44 Turning Hate Crimes into Copyright Crimes ................... 47 Chapter Four: A