Proceedings for 167th Meeting of SEAC scheduled to be held on 1st and 2nd July 2016

1st July 2016

Members present in the meeting:

Shri. N. Naganna - Chairman

Prof. D.L. Manjunath - Member

Dr. S. Manjappa - Member

Dr. B.S. Jaiprakash - Member

Shri. B. Chikkappaiah - Member

Dr. N. Krishnamurthy - Member

Dr. K.C. Jayaramu - Member

Dr. K.B. Umesh - Member

Sri. Subramany.M - Member

Sri. Vijaya Kumar - Secretary,

SEAC

The Chairman, SEAC, welcomed the members of the Committee and others present. The following proposals listed in the agenda were appraised in accordance of the provision of EIA Notification 2006. The observation and decision of the Committee are recorded under each of the agenda items.

Confirmation of the proceedings of 166th SEAC meeting held on 17th and 18th June 2016.

The State Expert Appraisal Committee, Karnataka perused the proceedings of 166th SEAC meeting held on 17th and 18th June 2016 and confirmed the same.

EIA presentation:

167.1 Development of Fishing Harbour at Kulai, Mangalore, Dakshina District by Deputy Director of Fisheries, Mangalore (SEIAA 19 IND 2014)

This is a proposal seeking Environment Clearance for Development of Fishing Harbour at Kulai, Mangalore, Dakshina Kannada District by Deputy Director of Fisheries, Mangalore.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 129th meeting of SEAC held on 9th, 10th and 11th February 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee screened the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, pre-feasibility report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

The Committee after discussion had decided to appraise the proposal as B1 and decided to issue Standard ToR for conducting EIA study in accordance with EIA 167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

Notification 2006 and the relevant guidelines considering the impact both on marine and terrestrial environment and after duly incorporating outcome of the public consultation.

Accordingly the ToRs was issued on 03.03.2015.

The proponent has submitted the EIA report on 04.06.2016.

The Proponent and NABET Accredited Consultant Sri. Rekha.S.Shah (Eco Chem Sales & Services.,) attended the 167th meeting of SEAC held on 1st July 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Pre Feasibility report, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. During the discussion, the committee wants to know whether the proponent has compared all the alternate sites proposed considering ocean dynamics and Environmental aspect before freezing the present proposed site. The EIA consultant has informed the committee that, the fisheries department has handed over the present site for them to conduct EIA studies and for this site they have conducted EIA studies considering Ocean dynamics & other relevant aspects. The committee asked the proponent to submit the study report of ocean dynamics. The committee observed that in the water analysis report, presence of high quantity of fluoride, turbidity are reported which the committee felt unnatural. In the list of species proposed to be planting in green belt area, some of the species are not suitable to coastal area. Also, it was observed that they are drawing fresh water for use, but, the committee opined that, drawl of fresh water can be reduced by treating the sea water using solar based desalination plant/RO treatment for using sea water directly.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the following information.

1. Revised water balance chart, Industry may consider to adopt desalination by R O technology for fresh water requirement. 2. Revised water analysis for base line data for surface, sub surface and sea water. 3. Revised species list proposed to be planted in green belt.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before the SEAC after the submission of the above information. Deferred Subjects:

167.2 Proposed residential apartment project “ Prabhavathi Daffodils” at Sy. No. 173, Gattihalli Village, Sarjapura Hobli, Anekal taluk, District of M/s. Prabhavathi Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd., No.13, 2nd Cross, N.S.Palya, Industrial Area, 65, BTM 2nd Stage, Next to Shoppers Stop, Bangalore - 560 076. (SEIAA 46 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. Prabhavathi Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd. M/s. Prabhavathi Builders & Developers Pvt. Ltd., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed development of Residential Apartment

2

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

Project at Sy. No. 173, Gattihalli Village, Sarjapura Hobli, Anekal taluk, Bangalore District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. 1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 12,241.63 Sq.mts 2. Project configuration: The proposed project consisting of B+G+4UF+TF with 490 flats and other civic amenities with a total built up area is 39,976.27 Sqm. 3. Land use details: Total plot area - 12,241.63 Sq.mts Built up area - 39,976.27 Sqm. Green belt area - on natural earth is 1,422.02 Sqm (11.6%) - On podium is 2,124.24 Sqm (17.4%) Paved area (drive way) - 2527.16 Sqm (20.6%) Other services - 210.0 Sqm (1.72%) Ground coverage - 5958.22 Sqm (48.7%)

4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 198.45 KLD.(132.3 fresh water + 66.15 KLD Recycled water) The source of water is Shantipura Gram panchayath. NOC from Gram Panchayath submitted. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 125.7 KLD (considering 95% sewage) and treated in STP design capacity of 270 KLD with SBR technology.

6. Excavated Earth Management: - The total Earth work generate is 10,000 Cum which will be used for back filling. 7. Solid Waste Management: The solid waste generated will be segregated into bio degradable, non biodegradable and inert waste. The biodegradable waste will be composted in organic waste convertor at the proposed project site. Non bio degradable waste will be sent to Municipal Corporation solid waste landfill. Bottles, tins and other scrap will be sold to other recyclers. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 2548 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 2x250 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: Parking provided is 301 PCU 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. 11. Other details: rain water harvesting proposed.

The proponent was invited for the 165th meeting of SEAC held on 26th and 27th May 2016 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The Committee had decided to defer the proponent providing one more opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

The proponent was invited for the 167th meeting of SEAC held on 1st and 2nd July 2016 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan and in the absence of the proponent. The committee observed the following points. 3

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

1. Clarification regarding KSPCB letter No. PCB/215/CNP/15/393 dated 04.01.2016. 2. Nature of karab land details with respect to NGT order not submitted. 3. Village map and RTC copy not enclosed. 4. Scheme for providing dual fuel generators for backup power with provision for CNG is not given. 5. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an appropriate plan thereof with due calculations not shown. 6. Scheme for utilisation of entire Rain Water harvested in the project site (both from the roof top and from the surface runoff) within the Project premises only not given. 7. Details of excavated earth and plan of safe and scientific disposal of excess excavated earth with details of the disposal site to be given. 8. Study of surface hydrology report taking in to consideration of micro water shed area of the region not forth coming in the application

The committee after discussion decided to give final opportunity to the proponent to submit the above details within 15 days, or otherwise, in the absence of the above information, the proposal will be recommended for closure.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before the SEAC after the submission of the above information.

167.3 Proposed residential building project at Sy. No. 47/1, 49/2 and 50, Ward No. 193, Village, Begur Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk of M/s. HV VENTURES PROJECTS PVT. LTD., No.26, Shankarmutt Road, , Bengaluru - 560004. (SEIAA 48 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. HV VENTURES PROJECTS PVT. LTD., M/s. HV VENTURES PROJECTS PVT. LTD., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed development of Residential Apartment Project at Sy. No. 47/1, 49/2 and 50, Ward No. 193, Arekere Village, Begur Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 12191.17 Sq.mts. 2. Project configuration: The project consisting of 178 Nos of residential units in B+G+17UFD and a club house with a total built up area of 36,616.67 Sqm. Ht of the building is 56.65 m. 3. Land use details: Total plot area - 12191.17 Sq.mts. Built up area - 36,616.67 Sqm. Green belt area - 5362.22 Sqm (43.98%) Paved area (drive way) - 3474.2 Sqm (28.51%) Other services - 252.38 Sqm (2.07%) Ground coverage - 3102.3 Sqm (25.44%)

4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 155 KLD.(103 fresh water + 51

KLD Recycled water) The source of water is BWSSB. 5. Wastewater Management: STP design capacity of 140 KLD with SBR technology.

4

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

6. Excavated Earth Management: - The total Earth work generate is 13000 Cum; 7400 Cum will be used for filling; 3500 Cum will be used for all round the setbacks levelling for backyards; 1800 cum will be used for landscape and 300 cum will be used to levelling of road and site formation. 7. Solid Waste Management: Total solid waste generated in the project site is 567 Kg/day out of which 233 Kg/day (40%) is organic and 334 Kg/day (60%) is inorganic. Sludge generated is 10 Kg/day will be reused as manure. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 920 KW is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 3x320 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: Traffic Details submitted. Parking required is 215 and provided is 245 PCU. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. 11. Other details: Rain water harvesting is proposed 12. Environmental Sensitivity: Arakere lake is adjacent to the project site. And 30 m buffer area is provided from the project site.

The proponent was invited for the 165th meeting of SEAC held on 26th and 27th May 2016 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The Committee observed that, as per the records submitted, Arakere lake is adjacent to the project site and 30 m buffer is provided from the boundary of the project site to lake. But as per the latest NGT order, minimum 75 m buffer has to left from the edge of the water level to the project boundary site and accordingly, the proponent has been asked to revise the conceptual plan and submit.

The committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent after the submission of the revised conceptual plan considering latest NGT order.

The proponent and Environmental consultant was invited for the SEAC meeting to provide required clarification and additional information.

The proponent has submitted the letter informing that, he requires 2 months time for preparation of revised conceptual plan.

The committee accepted the request letter given by the proponent and had decided to consider the proposal after the submission of the above information.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before the SEAC after the submission of the above information.

167.4 Proposed Residential Apartment project at Sy. No. 26/1 A, 26/1B, 27/1, 27/2, 27/3, Avalahalli Village, Hobli, Bangalore North, Bangalore of Sri. Madhav R. Badsheshi, # 333, Thimmaiah Road, Bangalore – 560 032 (SEIAA 55 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - Sri. Madhav R. Badsheshi, Sri. Madhav R. Badsheshi, have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed development of Residential Apartment Project at Sy. No. 26/1 A, 26/1B,

5

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

27/1, 27/2, 27/3, Avalahalli Village, Yelahanka Hobli, Bangalore North, Bangalore under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Project cost is 85 Crores. Land details: - Total Plot area is 13253.46 Sq.mts. Area relinquished for road widening is 1533.17 Sqm and net site area is 11720.29 Sqm 1. Project configuration: The project comprising of 2B+G+14UF+Club house at first floor level +TF with 414 units with a BUA is 63,746.13 Sqm. Ht of the building is 60 m. 2. Land use details: Total plot area - 13253.46 Sq.mts. Net site area - 11720.29 Sqm Built up area - 63,746.13 Sqm. Green belt area - 4007 Sqm (34.19%) Roads and open area - 2983.98 Sqm (25.46%) Ground coverage - 4728.96 Sqm (40.34%)

Permissible FAR is 3.25 and achieved is 3.245.

3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 293 KLD The source of water is

grampanchayath. NOC from Grampanchayath not submitted. 4. Wastewater Management: Waste water generated from the project is 249 KLD (considering 85%)and this will be treated in STP design capacity of 270 KLD with SBR technology. 5. Excavated Earth Management: - The total Earth work generate is 28373.76 Cum; 14186.88 Cum will be used for back filling; 2983.98 Cum will be used for roads formation; 4007.35 cum will be used for landscape and 7195.55 Cum is for filling for footings. 6. Solid Waste Management: Total solid waste generated in the project site is 828 Kg/day out of which 496.80 Kg/day is organic and 331.20 Kg/day is inorganic. 7. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1863 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 2x1000 KVA. 8. Traffic Details: Parking provided is 481 PCU. ROW is 9 m. 9. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. Gantiganahalli lake is 0.54 km (East direction), Avalahalli pond is 0.05 km (West direction) and Jalakabande Reserved forest is 2.3 km (SW Direction) 10. Other details: 10 Nos of rain water harvesting pits provided.

The proponent was invited for the 165th meeting of SEAC held on 26th and 27th May 2016 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The Committee observed that, as per the records submitted, Avalahalli pond is about 50 m from the boundary of the project site and as per the latest NGT order, minimum 75 m buffer has to left from the edge of the water level to the project boundary site and accordingly the conceptual plan has to be revised.

The committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent after the submission of the revised conceptual plan considering latest NGT order.

6

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

The proponent and Environmental consultant was invited for the 167th SEAC meeting held on 1st and 2nd July 2016 to provide required clarification and additional information.

The proponent has submitted the letter requesting for postponement to the next meeting.

The committee accepted the request letter given by the proponent and had decided to provide final opportunity to the proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before the SEAC in the subsequent meeting.

167.5 Proposed residential apartment project at Sy. No. 68/2 of Harlur village, Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk of M/s. Pariwar Housing Corporation and M/s Wise Builders and developers, # 167, 36th Cross, 18th Main, 4th T Block, Jayanagar, Bangalore- 560041. (SEIAA 62 CON 2016)

M/s. Pariwar Housing Corporation and M/s Wise Builders and developers., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed development of Residential Apartment Project at Sy. No. 68/2 of Harlur village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District, under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total Project cost is 90 Crores. 1. Land use details: - Total Plot area is 16,996.65 Sq.mts Ground Coverage is 4,851.28 Sqm(31.71%) Roads and open area is 3,781.06 Sqm(24.71%) Road widening is 1,697.88 Sqm Net Site Area is 15,298.77 Sqm Landscape area (proposed) is 6666.43 Sq.mts (43.57%). FAR Achieved 2.23 FAR Permissible 2.25 2. Project configuration: The proposed project consisting of BF + GF + 14UF with 318 no of units with Total Built up area is 59,691.30 Sqm. Ht. of Building is 44.95 M. The ROW is 12.19m. 3. Excavated Earth Management: - Total Excavated Earth is 24,256.40 m3 Back Filling for Footings is 9,702.56 m3 Back Filling for retaining wall is 773.13 m3 Top Soil for Landscaping – 9,999.65 m3 Filling for internal roads – 3,781.06 m3 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 221.81 KLD. The source of water is BWSSB. Copy of NOC not submitted. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 210 KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 230 KLD with SBR Technology. 6. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 636 Kg/day; where 382 kg/day is the biodegradable waste and 254 kg/day is non biodegradable waste.

7

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

7. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1431 Kw is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG set of 3 X 500 KVA. 8. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 351 Nos. 9. Environment sensitivity: EMP Submitted. Lakedew lake 0.10 kms; Harlur lake 0.50 kms; Chikka Kudlu lake 1.41 kms; Hosa lake 1.55 kms 10. Other details: Rain water harvesting is proposed.

The proponent was invited for the 165th meeting of SEAC held on 26th and 27th May 2016 to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The Committee had decided to defer the subject providing one more opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

The proponent and Environmental consultant was invited for the 167th SEAC meeting held on 1st and 2nd July 2016 to provide required clarification and additional information.

The proponent has submitted the letter requesting for postponement to the next meeting.

The committee accepted the request letter given by the proponent and had decided to provide final opportunity to the proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before the SEAC in the subsequent meeting.

167.6 Expansion of Residential apartment project at Sy. No. 3/1, Khatha No. 717/3/1, Singasandra Village, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of M/s Believe Enterprises Limited, Kaveri Multitech Center, Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bangalore- 560099. (SEIAA 69 CON 2016)

M/s Believe Enterprises Limited, have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed development of Residential Apartment Project at Sy. No. 3/1, Khatha No. 717/3/1, Singasandra Village, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total project cost is 35.94 Crores.

This is a proposal for expansion of residential apartment. No of units increased from 66 units to 173 units and built up area increased from 13,772.07 Sqm to 22,612.96 Sqm.

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 5099.18 Sqm. 2. Project configuration: The proposed project is having 173 units in B+G+7UF +TF with a total built up area of 22,612.96 Sqm. Ht of the building is 23.6m. 3. Land Use details: Landscape area (proposed): 974.16 Sqm (18.34 %) Paved area : 1786.39 Sqm (35.8%) Ground Coverage : 2338.63 Sqm (45.86%)

8

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

FAR permissible is 3.25 and achieved is 3.19 4. Excavated Earth Management: - Total Excavated Earth is 13,317.19 Cum Back filling for footings is 3,329.30 Cum The balanced 9,987.89 Cum will be used within the project site for landscaping of gardens and road making and excess soil used in other construction work.

5. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 116.8 KLD. The source of water is BWSSB. Copy of NOC submitted. 6. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 110.96 KLD (considering 95%)and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 115 KLD with SBR Technology. 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 432.5 Kg/day out of that 259.5 kg/day is organic w`aste and 173 kg/day is inorganic waste. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 750 KW is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG set of 1x320 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: Not Submitted. Parking Provided is 192 ECS. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant (Sri. Lohith Kumar H.N, consultant has got stay order from the high court for the MoEF Notification regarding presentation of the proposal by NABET/QCI accredited consultants) attended the 165th meeting of SEAC held on 26th and 27th May 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee observed that, already construction work has been commenced and as verified from the photos, already construction of 5th floor is under progress. The proponent informed the committee that, they have taken BBMP approval for G+3 UF for a built up area of 13772 Sqm and construction was started. But during construction, they have modified the configuration from 3 UF to 7 UF with an increase in BUA to 22162.96 Sqm, and hence, now they have applied for EC. Regarding obtaining CFE from the PCB before commencement of the work, the proponent replied that, during construction of G+3 UF, they have applied for CFE to PCB, but not obtained the same and later on they have again applied for CFE after there is a change in configuration and PCB has cancelled their earlier application. The proponent has failed to clarify the above violation and requested to defer the proposal to the next meeting.

The Committee after discussion had decided to defer the proposal as requested by the proponent.

The proponent has submitted the clarification with regard to violation on 31.05.2016.

The proponent and Environmental Consultant (Sri. Lohith Kumar H.N, consultant has got stay order from the high court for the MoEF Notification regarding presentation of the proposal by NABET/QCI accredited consultants) attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required clarification and additional information.

The committee perused the letter submitted by the proponent along with the justification given by the proponent. The proponent informed the committee that they have

9

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

tackled the 16,000 Sqm BUA out of 13772 Sqm which is the violation. In this regard the committee decided to report the violation to the Authority to take necessary action.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the Statutory Application Form-I, IA, conceptual plan and additional information provided during the meeting. The proponent presented the traffic study details during the meeting.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to submission of the following information and taking credible action for the violation of EIA notification 2006.

1. Study of surface hydrology report taking in to consideration of micro water shed area of the region 2. Baseline data for all the environmental parameters

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Recalled Subject:

167.7 Manufacturing of Cosmaceutical, Active Pharmaceuticals and Specialty Chemicals at Sy. No. 36A/B/60/62/63/64/65, 83P and 84, Industrial Area, Anekal Taluk Bangalore of M/s. Kumar Organic Products Limited, Plot no.36 B, Usha Krishna Tower, Road no.3&5, Jigani Industrial Area, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore (SEIAA 16 IND 2016)

Name of Applicant: - Mr. S.N.Singh, Director (works)

Name of the Consultancy Firm: - Hubert Enviro Care Systems (P) Ltd. Name of the Project: Expansion of Cosmaceutical, Active Pharmaceuticals and Specialty Chemicals manufacturing facility. Name of the Company: M/s. Kumar Organic Products Limited., Name of the Applicant: Mr. S.N.Singh, Director (works) M/s. Kumar Organic Products Limited., have applied for Environmental Clearance from SEIAA for their Proposed Expansion of Cosmaceutical, Active Pharmaceuticals and Specialty Chemicals at Sy. No. 36A/B/60/62/63/64/65, 83P and 84, Jigani Industrial Area, Anekal Taluk Bangalore District. The project site is located at Jigani Industrial area.

This is a project falling under the category 5(f)(Synthetic organic chemicals industry (dyes & dye intermediates; bulk)) of the Schedule of EIA Notification 2006.

1. The total Plot area is 40468 Sqm. 2. The built up area is existing 28328 Sqm and proposed expansion of 8093 Sqm and total built up area is 36421 Sqm..

1. The proposed activity is to Expansion of Cosmaceutical, Active Pharmaceuticals and Specialty Chemicals and the products are Zinc Citrate, Zinc Phosphate & Zinc Lactate.

2. Project Cost: Rs.750 Lakhs 3. Energy Requirement: The proposed power requirement for the project is 600 Kwh.

10

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

4. The required power will be drawn from BESCOM 5. Land form, Land use & Land Ownership: The proposed land comes under Jigani- Industrial area, Anekal. 6. Hazardous waste details: The hazardous wastes generated from plant are collected, stored and disposed through authorized disposal cum recycle facilities as per authorization from PCB and the unit has agreements with all waste disposal facilities for the same. The quantities of hazardous waste generated from various processes are shown in the table below.

Sl. Hazardous waste generated Quantity Method of handl;ing Category No 1 Used oil Collected in leak proof containers and disposed only to KSPCB 5.1 1.5 KL registered authorized re processor. 2 Organic residue Stored in secure manner and handed over to KSPCB authorized 28.1 1012.5 Mt/A incinerator. 3 M S Drums 1230 Nos/A Stored in secure manner and handed over to KSPCB authorized 33.3 4 HDPE used Liners 650 Nos/A recyclers. 34.3 5 ETP slidge/Chemical sludge Stored in secure manner and handed over to KSPCB authorized 34.3 22.0 Mt/A from clarifier and evaporator TSDF. 1. Table shows of the list of Hazardous Raw materials. Sl.No Name of raw material Quantity (MT/year) Proposed

1 2,4-DCP 1320 - 2 2,5-DCNB 1536 - 3 Sulphuric acid 7200 - 4 HCl 1200 - 5 Iron powder 1380 - 6 Hexane 300 - 7 Ethyl Acetate 60 - 8 Methanol 120 - 9 Hexanoic acid 60 - 10 Acetic acid 27.6 - 11 Resorcinol 60 - 12 Mono ethanol Amine 10 - 13 Butyric acid 20 - 14 Di-methylic acrylic acid 60 - 15 Ethyl Hexanol 500 - 16 Piperidine 100 - 17 2,4-6-aminochloropyridine 100 - 18 Zinc oxide - 1914 19 Citric acid - 420 20 Lactic acid - 3186 21 Phosphoric acid - 384

7. Industrial effluent: Industrial effluent is proposed to be sent to Effluent treatment plant for treatment and disposal.

8. Proposed products to be manufactured:

Sl.No Proposed products Capacity (Mt/Annum) 1 Zinc Citrate 600 2 Zinc Phosphate or Ethyle Hexyle Glycerine 600 3 Zinc Lactate 1800

11

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

9. Raw Materials: The required raw materials and quantities are shown in table 1.00 of Project report in page.no. 7. The total no. of raw materials procured is about 13. 10. Solid waste details: The total quantity of solid waste generated is 7971 Kg/day. Out of this, 2126 Kg/day is Organic waste, 3945 Kg/day is Inorganic waste and 1900 Kg/day of ETP sludge. 11. Water Requirement: The total water required for the proposed project 200 KLD (Existing 165 KLD and additional 35 KLD) The source of water supply is from KIADB & private tankers. 12. Waste Water Generation Management: The waste water generated will be treated at ETP. 13. Connectivity: Site is well connected by an asphalted road which further connects to Bengaluru – Chennai (NH-7) road at a distance of 10.00 Km from the Factory entrance. Nearest Railway station is Anekal12.00 Km and KIAL is 65 Km. 14. Other Details: The proponent has submitted Form-1, along with Pre-feasibility Report. 15. Environmental Sensitivity: a) Bannerghatta National Park 8.00 Km b) Jigani Village 3.00 Km c) Anekal Taluk 14.00 Km 16. Enclosures: Land Documents, Siteplan

The Proponent and NABET accredited consultant attended the 165th meeting of SEAC held on 26th and 27th May 2016 to present the ToRs.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, pre-feasibility report, and proposed ToRs and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that, already the industry is running and asked the proponent, whether the proposal is for new industry or expansion of existing one. For this the proponent informed the committee that, the proposal is for expansion of existing industry and also informed that, they have not taken EC earlier, since the industry is working since 1993 as stated by the proponent, and gone for expansion after 1994, EIA Notification of 1994 or 2006 to be verified as the industries which are not covered under above notification, State EC was mandatory for those industries as this is a bulk drug industry. It may be verified for its approvals and all the necessary approvals prevailing at the time of establishment as well as at the time of expansion. The matter may be verified asking the proponent to put up all the relevant records before taking up the case for consideration or recommending for any action from the authorities. All the running industry should take Environmental Clearance from the competent authority. The Committee after discussion decided to consider the proposal on submission of all relevant records for his justification. On due verification of the relevant records and the status of the approvals and other conditions, the project may be referred to SEIAA to initiate the credible action against the proponent for the violation.

12

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

The proponent has submitted the reply on 22.06.2016.

The committee perused the records submitted by the proponent and observed the following:

1. The industry is operating since 1993. According to the 1994 Notification the product what they had manufacturing is not attracting under EIA Notification 1994.

2. Further when they had gone for expansion in 1999 for Rose Oxide form 100 KG to 30MT/Month which was orange category and the investment cost was less than 5 crore.

3. Further the proponent had gone for another expansion in 2008 for the Fine Chemicals - Triclosan-90 mt/m, Beta Arbutin-990 Kg/m, n-oxide0990KG/m and indanone 8340 Kg/m which was having investment cost of less than 5 crores also not coming under RED categories as per the Government Orden No. FEE 129 EC 2005 dated 04.08.2005.

4. At every stage the proponent has obtained CFE and CFO from KSPCB.

5. Further the industry has gone for expansion in 2011 that the list of chemicals and drugs given are requires Prior Environmental Clearance as per the EIA Notification 2006 and they have also not obtained CFE from the KSPCB. In this regard the committee decided to report the violation SEIAA to initiate the necessary action.

6. The proponent stated that the BNP is more than 6 km from the proposed project site.

With due necessary action the committee also decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of standard ToRs along with the following additional ToRs to conduct the EIA studies in accordance with the EIA Notification 2006 and relevant guidelines. Exact distance from the BNP to be got certified from the Competent Authority 1. Green chemistry adopted in the process to be explained 2. Design of the solvent stripper and MEE to be provided 3. Whether the industry practices hydrogenation process? If yes, its impact and remedial measures for safety to be explained in the EIA report. 4. Cumulative impact on Environment from the adjoining industries to be studied with respect to VOC 5. Distance from the residential habitants to industrial boundary 6. Distance from the nearby lake boundary and NGT implication on the industry may be explained 7. List of solvents using which are banned to be replaced with the alternate solvents. Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

13

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

Reconsideration Subjects:

167.8 Brooke Bond SEZ Development Project at Khatha Old No. 119, New No.119 (Survey No. 103, 104, 105, 108, 108/2, 109, 112, 112/1 & 113/1B), Village, Hobli, Bangalore of M/s. Brookefields Real Estates and Project Private Limited, 29th & 30th Floor, World Trade Centre, Brigade Gateway Campus, 26/1,Dr.Rajkumar Road,, Bengaluru. (SEIAA 138 CON 2015)

M/s. Brookfields Real Estate and Projects Pvt. Ltd., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed Brooke Bond SEZ Development Project at Khatha Old No., 119, (Sy. No. 103, 104, 105, 108, 108/2, 109, 112, 112/1 & 113/1B), Kundalahalli Village, Krishnarajapuram Hobli, Bangalore

1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 1,08,658.20 (26 Acres, 34 Guntas) 2. The project consists 3B + GF + 3 UF to 12 UF with Total Built up area is 5,58,940 Sq.mts. Ht. of Building is 45 M. 3. Landscape area (proposed): 35,857.21 Sq.mts 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 1796 KLD. The source of water is BWSSB + Rooftop Rainwater + Treated water. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is --- KLD and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 1450 KLD (250 KLD X 2 No’s. 475 KLD X 2 No’s) with SBR Technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management:- Total Excavated Earth is 2,58,620 Cu.m. 24,750 Cu.m of soil will be used for landscaping and about 1,35,642 Cu.m will be used for levelling, backfilling and internal roads. Remaining 98,228 Cu.m will be handed over to contractors authorized to fill low lying areas/abandoned quarries. 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 9,440 Kg/day; out of which 3,851 is organic, treated in organic waste convertor & 5,589 Kg/day is inorganic handover to the local authorized recyclers. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 24 MVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG set of 4000 KVAX 6 No’s. 9. Traffic Details: Parking proposed:7,900 Cars. 10. Other details: Height of the building is 45 M.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 149th meeting of SEAC held on 28th, 29th and 30th September 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. Since the project falls in the category B1, the committee decided to appraise the proposal under B1 category. The committee observed that the there is a change in the project name.

The Committee after discussion had decided to issue following additional TOR’s along with Standard TOR’s.

14

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

1. Revised application form regarding change in the name of the project. 2. Detailed write up for the classification of this project under SEZ category. 3. Scheme of protection of nala running through the site 4. List of trees present in the site and no. of trees to be cut compensating the same as per norms, 5. Scheme of disposal of dismantled debris due to demolition of the existing building. 6. Hydrological study of the area influencing the project site (including two lakes nearby) and quantity of discharge through the nala 7. Demarcation of karab land and its area 8. Scheme of utilisation of entire treated water 9. Identification of the sensitive areas around the project site and their list 10. Source of water.

Accordingly the ToR was issued on 13.10.2015.

The project proponent has submitted the EIA report vide letter dated 19.03.2016.

The Proponent and EIA coordinator from M/s. ABC Technologies have attended the 163rd meeting of SEAC held on 15th and 16th April 2016 to present the EIA report.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The proponent informed that they have collected the baseline data between October 2015 to December 2015 and requested to accept the same. The committee observed the following points:

1. There is a discrepancy in kharab area and net area calculation. 2. In grey water treatment plant filter bag is used 3. Mass balance for STP not given 4. Details of excavated earth and its utilization within the project site is not clear

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Kharab area and net area calculation discrepancy has to clarified 2. Replacing the filter bags with filter press in grey water treatment 3. In the existing trees rare species in Sl. No. 13, 16, 41, 47 and 62 are to be protected and retained. 4. Mass balance for STP to be submitted 5. Detailed calculation of excavated earth and its utilization within the project site to be submitted 6. Positioning of grey treatment plant and organic waste converter points should confirm to slopes in site. 7. Explore the possibility of covering the drain after obtaining the permission from the competent Authority. 8. A bridge to be proposed across the drain after obtaining the permission from the competent Authority.

15

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 06.06.2016.

The proponent and Environmental Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required clarification/additional information.

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent. The proponent informed that the nala passing in their project is categorised as tertiary nala and as per the NGT order 25 m buffer from the edge of the nala has been earmarked and the copy of the site plan showing the buffer zone is submitted. The committee asked the proponent to get the classification of the nala with respect to Tertiary, Secondary and Primary from the BDA.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the document of classification of the nala with respect to Tertiary, Secondary and Primary from the BDA.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

167.9 Proposed residential building development project SENORITA II at Sy. No. 6/2, Bengaluru East Taluku, Bengaluru District of M/s. Salarpuria Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., # 3, 4th Floor, Salarpuria Windsor, Road, Bengaluru, Pin: 560 042.(SEIAA 185 CON 2015)

M/s. Salarpuria Real Estate Pvt. Ltd (SREPL) have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of SENORITA II Residential building at Sy. No. 6/2, Bengaluru East Taluku, Bengaluru District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

Land details: - Total Plot area is 10061.41 Sq.mts

1. The proposed project consists gross builtup area of 42,672.57 Sq.mts comprising 132 No’s of residential flats with building configuration 2B + GF +17 UF. Total cost of the project is Rs. 98.61 Crores. 2. Landscape area (proposed): 3063 Sq.mts 3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 110 Cu.m/day. Water requirement for the project will be met by BWSSB. Copy of NOC is submitted. 4. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 88 Cu.m/day and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 90 Cu.m by SBR Technology. 5. Excavated Earth Management: The total earth excavation carried out is about 12,370 m3. About 3,000 Cu.m will be used for backfilling done between foundations, 3,000 Cu.m will be used for backfilling done on the backside of retaining walls & underground tanks, 3,220 Cu.m will be used for filling up low level areas, and 3,150 Cu.m top soil is used for landscape development. 6. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 297 kgs/day; which includes organic waste is 119 kgs/day and inorganic waste is 119 kgs/day. Organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers. 16

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

7. Hazardous Waste Management: Waste oil from D.G. sets about 1KL per annum, is stored in drum and handed over to KSPCB authorized waste oil reprocessors. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1838 KVA is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 2 x 500 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: Traffic details mentioned. Parking proposed: 323 No’s of cars. L.O.S is B-B-B. 10. Environment sensitivity: Lake, Kaikondrahalli Lake, Saul Kere, Kasavanahalli Lake, Iblur Lake, Halanayakanahalli Lake, Doddakanneli Lake & Agara Lake at 2.66 Kms, 0.73 Kms, 0.70 Kms, 1.20 Kms, 1.98 Kms, 1.5 Kms, 1.33 Kms & 4.12 Kms respectively. 11. Other details: Height of the building is 59.9 M. Rain water harvesting system proposed. Total energy savings is 20.85% mentioned.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The proponent has submitted traffic census details during presentation.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the following information.

1. Revised water balance considering 95% sewage generation and the scheme of treatment for reusing the treated water 2. Details of excavated earth(with calculation) and plan of safe and scientific disposal of excess excavated earth with details of the disposal site 3. Detailed Hydrological study of the influencing area 4. List of species to be planted with their scientific names 5. Baseline data

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 24.02.2016.

The committee perused the reply during the 161st meeting of SEAC held on 28th and 29th March 2016 and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent except the earth work utilization within the project site and hydrological study.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Rework the earth work calculation by reducing the earth work generation or utilizing the entire earth generated within the project site only.

2. Hydrological study considering the micro and mini water shed area where the project site is located and accordingly the details of the drain/nala to be furnished.

17

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 03.06.2016.

The proponent and Environmental Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required clarification/additional information.

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent and accepted the replies except the earth work management within the project site. The committee advised the proponent to reduce the earth work generation by utilizing the contour levels and providing 1 ½ basement below ground level and ½ basement above ground level.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the revised earth work management plan with above consideration and its utilization within the project site.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

167.10 Proposed Residential apartment at Sy. No. 17/1A, 17/1C,17/2, Village Yeshwantpur of M/s. Salarpuria Real Estate Pvt. Ltd., # 3, 4th floor, Salarpuria Windsor, Ulsoor road, Bengaluru - 560 042.(SEIAA 186 CON 2015)

M/s.Sattva Developers Pvt. Ltd (SDPL) have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their proposed construction of Residential building at Sy. No. 6/2, Bengaluru East Taluku, Bengaluru District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. 1. Land details: - Total gross Plot area is 11039.995 Sq.mts 2. The proposed project consists gross builtup area of 53,532 Sq.mts comprising 286 No’s of residential flats with building configuration consists of 3 Towers 2B + GF +24 UF. Total cost of the project is Rs.116.34 Crores. 3. Landscape area (proposed): 4,520 Sq.mts (Natural Ground) 1,071 Sq.mts (on Podium) 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 160 Cu.m/day. Water requirement for the project will be met by BWSSB. Copy of NOC is submitted. 5. Wastewater Management: The total quantity of waste water generated is 130 Cu.m/day and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 130 Cu.m by SBR Technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management: The total earth excavation carried out is about 19,598.16m3. About 6,000 Cu.m will be used for backfilling done between foundations, 5,150 Cu.m will be used for backfilling done on the backside of retaining walls & underground tanks, 4,700 Cu.m will be used for filling up low level areas, and 3,748 Cu.m top soil is used for landscape development. 7. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 583 kgs/day; which includes organic waste is 350 kgs/day and inorganic waste is 233 kgs/day. Organic waste is treated in organic waste convertor. Inorganic waste is handed over to authorized recyclers. 8. Hazardous Waste Management: Waste oil from D.G. sets about 1KL per annum, is stored in drum and handed over to KSPCB authorized waste oil reprocessors. 18

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

9. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 2058 KVA is sourced from BESCOM. Backup power proposed is DG set of 2 x 360 KVA. Total energy savings is 20% mentioned. 10. Traffic Details: Parking proposed: 333 No’s of cars. L.O.S is B-B-B. 11. Environment sensitivity: EMP Submitted. Dasarahalli Tank, Doddabidirakallu kere, Anchepalya Lake, Lake, at 0.49 Kms, 1.19 Kms, 2.9 Kms, 3.96 Kms and three water bodies at 2.28kms, 2.49 kms & 4.5 kms respectively. 12. Other details: Height of the building is 76.5 M(Max.ht w.r.to all 3 Towers) Rain water harvesting system proposed. 13. Connectivity: The project is located along Tumkur road of RoW 45m which connects to Nelamanagala on one side and to Yeshwanthpur on another side.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 154th meeting of SEAC held on 24th, 25th and 26th November 2015 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan, EIA report and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The proponent has submitted traffic census details during presentation.

The Committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after the submission of the following information.

1. Revised water balance considering 95% sewage generation and the scheme of treatment for reusing the treated water 2. Details of excavated earth(with calculation) and plan of safe and scientific disposal of excess excavated earth with details of the disposal site 3. Detailed Hydrological study of the influencing area 4. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an appropriate plan thereof with due calculations. 5. Baseline data

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 25.02.2016.

The committee perused the reply during the 161st meeting of SEAC held on 28th and 29th March 2016 and agreed with the replies submitted by the proponent except the earth work utilization within the project site and hydrological study.

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Rework the earth work calculation by reducing the earth work generation or utilizing the entire earth generated within the project site only. 2. Hydrological study considering the micro and mini water shed area where the project site is located and accordingly the details of the drain/nala to be furnished.

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 03.06.2016.

19

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

The proponent and Environmental Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required clarification/additional information.

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent and accepted the replies except the earth work management within the project site. The committee advised the proponent to reduce the earth work generation by utilizing the contour levels and providing 1 ½ basement below ground level and ½ basement above ground level.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the revised earth work management with above consideration and its utilization within the project site.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

167.11 Residential Apartment Project at Khatha No.421, Sy.No.26/27, Chunchaghatta Village, Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District of M/s. Majestic Property Developers Pvt. Ltd.(SEIAA 1 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. Majestic Property Developers Pvt. Ltd. M/s. Majestic Property Developers Pvt. Ltd., has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their Residential Apartment Project at Sy.No. No.421, Sy.No.26/27, Chunchaghatta Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total Project cost = Rs. 65 Cr. Land details: - Total Plot area is 18,109.43 Sqm 1. The proposed residential buildings comprising 2 blocks: Block A having B+G+4 UF+Terrace Floor with 215 units and Block B having G+4 UF+ Terrace Floor with 100 units with a total built up area of 49,963.70 Sqm. Ht of the building is 14.95 m, Right of way is 9.28 m. 2. Land use details: Total plot area -18,109.43 Sqm Green belt area -8,489.96 Sqm (46.88%) Ground coverage -7,290 Sqm (40.26%) Permissible FAR is 1.75 and proposed is 1.74. 3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 219 KLD.(149 KLD fresh water + 70 KLD Recycled water) The source of water is from BWSSB. 4. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 187 KLD (considering 85% waste generation) and treated is proposed STP of design capacity of 200 KLD with SBR technology. 5. Excavated Earth Management: - details not submitted 6. Solid Waste Management: Total waste generated in the project is 630 Kgs/day; where 378 kgs/day is the organic waste and 252 kgs/day is inorganic waste, will be disposed to Vendors/ Recyclers.

20

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

7. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1420 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 3X450 KVA. Energy savings is 16.279%. 8. Traffic Details: Not submitted. Parking provided is 347. 9. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. 10. Other details: 8 Nos of recharge pits have been provided to recharge the ground water within the site. 11. Environmental sensitive area: Sarakki Lake – 0.1 km; Lake – 1.3 km; Chunchugatta Lake – 0.25 Kms.

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the 160th meeting of SEAC held on 1st, 2nd and 3rd March 2016 to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The proponent submitted the detailed earth work calculation and traffic study report during the presentation. The committee made the following observations:

1. Sarakki lake is 0.1 km and Chunchugatta lake is 0.25 km from the project site 2. There was discrepancy in the water balance chart. 3. Base line data not submitted

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Clarification regarding the project area is not falling under eco sensitive area from sensitive zone clearance committee of BDA 2. Hydrology study of the area influencing the surface water flow considering the Sarakki lake and Chunchugatta lake. 3. Revised water balance chart 4. EMP & baseline data for the environmental parameters

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 28.03.2016.

The committee perused the replies submitted by the proponent during the 161st meeting of SEAC held on 28th and 29th March 2016. The committee observed that, Hydrological study is not conducted considering Sarakki & Chunchagatta lake (Micro water shed network).

The committee after discussion had decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the revised hydrology study considering Sarakki & Chunchagatta lake (Micro water shed network).

The proponent has submitted the reply vide letter dated 11.06.2016.

The proponent and Environmental Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required clarification/additional information. 21

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

The committee perused the reply submitted by the proponent and accepted the replies. The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

Fresh Subjects:

167.12 Expansion Cement Plant at Sy. No 61, Sadarahalli, Chikkanayakanahalli, Tumkur, Karnataka of M/s Siddaganga Cements Pvt Ltd, Sy no 61, Sadarahalli, Cikkanayakana Halli, Tumkur District, Karnataka (SEIAA 24 IND 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s Siddaganga Cements Pvt Ltd, Name of the consultant: Sri Mahadevaswamy P (obtained stay from the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka)

M/s Siddaganga Cements Pvt Ltd, has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their expansion cement plant at Sy. No 61, Sadarahalli, Chikkanayakanahalli, Tumkur, Karnataka under 3(b) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. The total project cost is 6.95 crores The existing unit which is having 30 TPD production capacity started in the year of 1983. Now proposed to expansion from 30 TPD to 200 TPD. (CFO compliance given. CFO not submitted) 1. Plot Area: Total plot area is 4-38 Acres. 2. Land use details: Built up area -1.250 Acres Road area -1.125 Acres Green belt area -1.825 Acres Vacant land -0.75 Acres 3. Water requirement: Water requirement is 2.025 KLD will be met from borewell existing in the project site. 4. Energy requirement: The total energy requirement for the project is 250 KVA

The major raw materials for the grinding unit are Clinker, Gypsum, Flyash and Slag and the quantities of raw materials imported and their sources are as follows,

Sl.No Raw Materials Maximum Quantity TPD Sources 1 Ordinary port land 70 BMM Cements Hospet cement 53 grade 2 Granulated Slag GGBS 17.5 JSW Steel plant Bellary 3 Flyash 30 JSW Steel plant Bellary 4 Gypsum 7.5 The Fertilizers & Chemicals Travancore limited, Cochin 5 Clinker 75 Heidelberg cements india limited, Tumkur 6 PP Bags 4200 nos Tumkur

The proponent and Environmental Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required clarification/additional information. 22

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the Statutory Application- Form I, pre-feasibility report and information provided during the meeting. The proponent informed the committee that they are not adding any additional land and they are adding only blending unit. Also the proponent informed that 90% of raw materials will be transported by train and requested to consider the proposal as B2.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Copy of CFO. 2. Alternative source for fly ash except JSW Steel Plant, Bellary, as they have their own cement plant for the usage of fly ash accordingly the source of raw material to be changed and submitted. 3. Dust control measures taken in the industry. 4. Revised process flow chart with replacement of bag filters in place of dust collector. 5. An undertaking that the minimum 90% of the raw materials will be through railways.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal after submission of the above information.

167.13 Proposed Expansion and Modification of Pharmaceutical Industry Unit II at plot No. 28, KIADB Industrial Area, Jigani Anekal Taluk, Bangalore-562106 of M/s. Hikal Ltd Unit II, Plot no. 28,, KIADB Industrial Area, Jigani, Anekal Taluk, Bangalore (SEIAA 25 IND 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. Hikal Ltd, Name of the consultant: Sri Mohammed Habibulla (obtained stay from the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka)

M/s. Hikal Ltd, has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their expansion of manufacturing of bulk drugs & intermediates at plot No. 28, KIADB Industrial Area, Jigani Anekal Taluk, Bangalore-562106 under 5(f)) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. The total project cost is 27.11 crores

Ealier CFE/CFO/EC details not available in the file.

1. Plot Area: Total plot area is 8114 Sqm. 2. Water requirement: Water requirement is 30 KLD will be met from KIADB. 3. Energy requirement: The total energy requirement for the project is 400 KVA and will be met from BESCOM. Backup power provided 1x250 KVA. 4. Environmental sensitivity: Bannergatta National Park is 13.1 km as details submitted in the Form I. But as per the google map submitted by the proponent it is within 5 km from the project site.

23

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

Product- Raw material and capacity details:

Production/expansion details/annum Sl.No.Current Products UOM Capacity Expansion Product UOM Capacity mix 1 Oxpentifylline Tonnes 12 2 - - - PBA HCL Tonnes 12 3 - - - Pregabalin Tonnes 10 4 - - - Quetiapine Tonnes 15 5 - - - Corey lactone Tonnes 0.5 6 - - - Trityl Olmesartan Tonnes 1.5 7 - - - CF3 Ketone Tonnes 3 8 - - - Thiabendazole(TBZ) Tonnes 3 9 - - - Nitinpyram Tonnes 0.3 10 - - - Selemectin Tonnes 0.15 11 - - - Ketosulphone Tonnes 10 12 - - - Etoricoxib Tonnes 5 13 Total 12 60.45 List of Raw Material:

Consumption of raw material per unit Name of the Name of the Products During the previous During the next Raw materials financial year 2014-15 in financial year in Kgs Kgs DMF Oxypentifylline - 2.67 Theo bromine - 0.83 K2CO3 - 0.51 Chlorohexanone - 0.71 Methanol - 6.1 Carbon - 0.052 Hyflosupercel - 0.028

The proponent and Environmental Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required clarification/additional information.

The committee observed that the industry was established in 2004 with one product and the proponent has not submitted the CFO/CFE/SECC. The proponent informed that the investment cost for the project less than 5 Crores does not require State ECC. The committee asked the proponent to provide justification/document to show that the SECC is not required for project cost with investment cost less than 5 crores at the time of establishment. The committee also observed that the Bannergatta National Park is within 5 km as per the google map submitted. In this regard the committee asked the proponent to get the distance from the Bannergatta National Park from the DFO.

24

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

The committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent after submission of the above information.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal after submission of the above information.

167.14 Manufacturing of Bulk Drugs & Intermediates Project at Plot No.99-102, 105-108, Raichur Growth Centre Industrial Area, Chicksugur Village, Raichur Taluk & District of M/s. YMS Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., F.No.201, GEV Tulasi, Plot No.151, 152 & 153, Pragathi Nagar, Opp. JNTU, Hydarabad - 500090.(SEIAA 26 IND 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. YMS Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Name of the consultant: M/s. Team Labs and Consultants, Hyderabad (NABET accredited organization) M/s. YMS Laboratories Pvt. Ltd., has applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their new manufacturing of bulk drugs of 100 Kg/day and intermediates 400 kg/day at at Plot No.99-102, 105-108, Raichur Growth Centre Industrial Area, Chicksugur Village, Raichur Taluk & District under 5(f)of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B.

The project has been considered by the MoEF in the 16th Reconstituted Expert Appraisal Committee (Industry-2) held during 20th and 21st February 2014 due to applicability of general condition i.e location of project from interstate boundary within 10 km. As per amendment Notification dated 25.06.2014, general condition applies to less than 5 km instead of 10 km. Therefore the proposal has been treated as category B and forwarded the file to SEIAA for further necessary action vide MoEF and CC letter dated J- 11011/11/2014-IA II(I) dated 22nd March 2016. The MoEF and CC has issued the ToR vide letter No. J-11011/11/2014-IA II(I) dated 30.04.2014.

Now the proponent has submitted the Final EIA report vide letter dated 27.05.2016 along with the statutory application Form-I and processing fee.

The proponent and Functional Area Expert Sri T. Ravi Kiran (EIA coordinator Sri G.V. Reddy given authorization to Sri T. Ravi Kiran, Functional Area Expert) attended the meeting of SEAC to present EIA report and provide required information/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the Statutory Application- Form I, pre-feasibility report and information provided during the meeting. During the presentation the committee made the following observations:

1. Hazardous wastes are sent to TSDF 2. In EIA report sodium borohydride, sodium borocyanide and bromine are used for manufacture. Chlorobenzene and dichloromethane are being used as solvents 3. Solvent recovery systems not adopted

25

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental clearance subject to the following conditions:

1. Products having raw material consumption like Chlorobenzene, sodium borohydride, sodium borocyanide and bromine shall not be manufactured. 2. Proponent accepted to drop the manufacturing of products having raw material consumption like chlorobenzene, sodium borohydride, sodium borocyanide. consequently the following proposed products (4- chlorophenyl)(4-hydroxy phenyl) methanone, Zolmitriptan, 5-Bromo indole and 2-(dibutylamino)-1-(2,7-dichloro 9H-fluoren-4-yl)ethanol shall be dropped from the manufacturing products. 3. Best manufacturing measures shall be adopted for reduction in consumption of dichloromethane. 4. Para formaldehyde to be used instead of formaldehyde 5. In all reduction reactions H2 gas to be used as reducing agents in the presence of Pd/C as catalystinstead of sodium borohydride 6. Reactions involved with SOCl2 to be modified with green chemistry methods 7. Ethylene dichloride to be replaced by any other non-toxic solvents in all chemical reactions. 8. Maximum solvent recovery methods to be adopted using best available technology without causing fugitive emissions.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

167.15 Proposed residential apartment project at Municipal No. 128/93, Ward No. 196, Sy. No. 93, Alahalli Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk of M/s. Vaishnavi Infrastructures Pvt Ltd., No. 2/2, Walton Road, Off. Vittal Malya Road, Bangalore – 560001.(SEIAA 84 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. Vaishnavi Infrastructures Pvt Ltd., Environmental Consultant: M/s. Environmental Health and Safety Consultant Pvt Ltd Latitude: 120 52’ 27.10”N Longitude: 770 33’ 53.96” E M/s. Vaishnavi Infrastructures Pvt Ltd., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their residential apartment project at Municipal No. 128/93, Ward No. 196, Sy. No. 93, Alahalli Village, Uttarahalli Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. The project cost is Rs. 59 Crores. 1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 11938.2 Sq.mts. 2. Project configuration: the proposed building consists of 262 units in three blocks and a club house. Block –A is 2B+G+13UF with ht of 42.03 m, Block – B is 2B+G+13UF with a ht of 42.03 m and Block –C is 2B+G+11UF with ht of 36.09 m with a total built up area of 38921.37 Sqm.

26

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

3. Land use details: Total plot area - 11938.2 Sq.mts Built up area - 38921.37 Sqm. Green belt area - 4517.69 Sqm (37.83%) Ground coverage - 19.20%

FAR is permissible is 2.50 and achieved is 2.49 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 195 KLD (130 KLD Fresh water +65 KLD recycled water). The source of water is BWSSB & Borewell. NOC from BWSSB not submitted. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 176 KLD (considering 90% sewage) and treated in STP design capacity of 180 KLD with SBR technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management:The total Earth work generate is 8,500 cum Backfilling in foundation is 850 Cum For site formation is 4500 Cum For landscaping is 1150Cum Roads and walk ways is 2000 Cum 7. Solid Waste Management: The solid waste generated will be segregated is 0.589 MT/day. Biodegradable is 00.323 MT/day and 0.265 MT/day is non- biodegradable. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1998 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 4x500 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: Traffic Details submitted. Parking provided is 346 PCU. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. EMP baseline data not submitted. Avalahalli Lake – 0.72 Km (SE); Konankunte Lake is 0.73 Km (NW); Krishna Nagar Kere – 1.50 Km (NE); Chunchugatta Lake – 1.74 Km (NE) and RBI Layout Lake – 2.37 Km (SE) 11. Other details: Roof top rain water collected in terrace rain water collection sumps of capacity of 130 Cum and ground water will be recharged through 20 Nos of percolation pits.

Note: as per the land records there is an Halla in the North side

The proponent and EIA coordinator attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required clarification/additional information.

The committee observed that the there is a nala in the north side of the project site. BBMP also classified this nala as tertiary nala and there is no any kharab land in the Sy. No. 93. The proponent informing that there is a land in between the property and the nala which cannot be acceptable as per the records submitted by the proponent. The proponent is asked to clarify the above issue with the supporting documents.

The committee after discussion decided to recall the proponent after submission of the above information.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal after submission of the above information. 27

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

167.16 Modification of Residential Apartment Project at Khata No.1531/34/12, 34/13, 34/11, 34/10, 34/9 & Sy.Nos.34/9, 34/10, 34/11, 34/12, 34/13 of Junnasandra Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of M/s. KLASSIK ENTERPRISES (P) LTD., Sy.Nos.10/1 & 11/1 of Kalena Agrahara, Near Meenakshi Temple, Bannerghatta Road, Bangalore - 76. (SEIAA 87 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. KLASSIK ENTERPRISES (P) LTD., Environmental Consultant: Sri. Dhanraj Bharathi Narasimha (obtained stay from the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka) M/S. Klassik Enterprises (P) Ltd., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their 167.16 Modification of Residential Apartment Project at Khata No.1531/34/12, 34/13, 34/11, 34/10, 34/9 & Sy.Nos.34/9, 34/10, 34/11, 34/12, 34/13 of Junnasandra Village, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. The project cost is Rs. 75 Crores.

The proposal is for modification of residential apartment project for which the EC has been issued by the SEIAA vide letter No. SEIAA 176 CON 2012 dated 7th March 2013 for plot area of 44,211.91 Sqm and a built up area of 94,148.00 Sqm with a configuration of 590 flats in B+G+14UF in Blocks I,II,III,IV, V and B+G+13UF in Block VI, VII. Compliance to the earlier EC submitted.

Competitive statement for the earlier EC and proposing is given below:

Sl. Description As per the Present/as per Remarks No earlier EC Modification 1 Usage Residential Residential No change 2 Plot area 44,211.91 Sqm 44,211.91 Sqm No change 3 Built up area 94,148 Sqm 94,148 Sqm No change 4 No. of flats 590 698 +108 Nos 5 Water 398.25 KLD 471.15 KLD +72.9 KLD consumption 6 STP capacity 327.6 KLD 450 KLD +123 KLD 7 Car parking 800 cars 1001 cars +201 cars 8 Investment cost 72 crores 75 crores +3 crores

1. Project configuration: The project is a modified residential apartment comprising of 698 flats with a configuration of 2B+G+14UF 2. Land use details: Green belt area - 23,152.16 Sqm (52.38%) Ground coverage - 7115.89 Sqm (16.09%) Paved area - 11729.95 Sqm (26.53%) 3. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 471 KLD (297 KLD Fresh water +173 KLD recycled water). The source of water is BWSSB. NOC from BWSSB submitted.

28

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

4. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 424 KLD (considering 90% sewage) and treated in STP design capacity of 450 KLD with SBR technology. 5. Excavated Earth Management:The total Earth work generate is 49857 cum Backfilling in foundation is 42378.98 Cum Remaining 7478.6445 Cum of top soil will be utilized for compound wall construction where in the excavated soil is mixed with cement mortar for the bricks. 6. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1640 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 1x1640 KVA. 7. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. EMP baseline data submitted. 8. Other details: Rain water harvesting is proposed.

As per the land records there is 0-23.08 acres kharab land

The proponent and environmental consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required information/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the Statutory Application- Form I, IA, conceptual plan and information provided during the meeting. During the presentation the committee made the following observations:

1. Discrepancy in the built up area in Application and presentation 2. In the land use statement civic amenities 5% not mentioned 3. Out of 7 towers, 3 towers have been tackled and completed, 2 in progress and another 2 to be tackled with 2 basements. 4. There is a road kharab land of 0-23.08 Acres

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance with a condition that the road kharab area should be open to access public and subject to submission of the following information:

1. Revised Application Form I and IA for expansion and modification and for built up area 2. Revised land use statement 3. Block wise area statement

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

2nd July 2016

Members present in the meeting:

Shri. N. Naganna - Chairman Prof. D.L. Manjunath - Member Dr. S. Manjappa - Member Dr. B.S. Jaiprakash - Member 29

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

Shri. B. Chikkappaiah - Member

Dr. N. Krishnamurthy - Member Dr. K.C. Jayaramu - Member

Dr. K.B. Umesh - Member

Sri. Subramany.M - Member

Sri. Vijaya Kumar - Secretary,

SEAC

167.17 Proposed residential apartment project at Sy. No. 25/1, & 27/3, Bidare Agrahara Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk of Sri. M. Anjannappa Road, No. 133, 3rd, E Cross, 1st G Main, Kasturi Nagar, Bangalore – 560043. (SEIAA 85 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - Sri. M. Anjannappa Environmental Consultant: Sri. Dhanraj Bharathi Narasimha (obtained stay from the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka) Latitude: 130 02’11.70”N; Longitude: 770 45’4.51”E Sri. M. Anjannappa have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their residential apartment project at Sy. No. 25/1, & 27/3, Bidare Agrahara Village, Bidarahalli Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. The project cost is Rs. 85 Crores. 1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 18,008.36 Sq.mts. 2. Project configuration: Residential apartment consisting of 348 units comprising of 2B+G+12UF+TF+2 club house one at GF and another at FF with a total BUA of 55,459.03 Sqm. Ht of the building is 38.80 m 3. Land use details: Total plot area - 18,008.36 Sq.mts Built up area - 55,459.03 Sqm. Green belt area - 5819.47 Sqm (32.59%) Ground coverage - 4435.67 Sqm (24.84%) Roads and open area - 5,028.34 Sqm (28.16%)

FAR is permissible is 2.25 and achieved is 2.249 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 242 KLD (164 KLD Fresh water +78 KLD recycled water). The source of water is BWSSB. NOC from BWSSB not submitted. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 230. KLD (considering 95% sewage) and treated in STP design capacity of 250 KLD with SBR technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management:The total Earth work generate is 26614.02 cum Backfilling for footings is 7984.21Cum Backfilling for retaining wall is 5208.87 Cum For landscaping is 8392.60 Cum Fillings for internal Roads is 5,028.34 Cum 7. Solid Waste Management: The solid waste generated will be segregated is 696 Kg/day. Sludge generated from the STP is 10 Kg/day which will be reused as manure within the site for landscaping/greenbelt development.

30

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1566 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 3x450 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: Parking provided is 440 PCU. Road width in front of the project site is 12.19 m 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. Chikkabanahalli lake is 1.60 Kms (S); Yella Mallappachetty lake is 2.20 Km (SW) and Hoskote lake is 3.30 Km (NE) 11. Other details: Roof top rain water collected in terrace rain water collection sumps of capacity of 90 Cum and ground water will be recharged through 17 Nos of recharge pits.

The proponent and environmental consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required information/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the Statutory Application- Form I, IA, conceptual plan and information provided during the meeting. During the presentation the committee observed that there is a discrepancy in the excavated earth management submitted in the application and presentation. The committee asked the proponent to submit the revised excavated earth management and its utilization within the project site.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to submission of revised excavated earth management and its utilization within the project site and NOC from BWSSB.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

167.18 Residential Development Project at Sy.No.29 & Ward No.49 at K.R.Puttanna Chetty Road, K G Nagar, Bangalore of M/s. Concorde Housing Corporation Pvt. Ltd., #46, 1st Main Road, 3rd Phase, J P Nagar, Bangalore - 560078.(SEIAA 86 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. Concorde Housing Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Environmental Consultant: Sri. Dhanraj Bharathi Narasimha (obtained stay from the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka) Latitude: 120 57’24.50”N; Longitude: 770 34’03.80”E M/s. Concorde Housing Corporation Pvt. Ltd., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their residential apartment project at Sy.No.29 & Ward No.49 at K.R.Puttanna Chetty Road, K G Nagar, Bangalore under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. The project cost is Rs. 45 Crores. 1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 4,324.38 Sq.mts. Area left for road widening is 489.69 Sqm. Net area available is 3,835.14 Sqm. 2. Project configuration: The project consists of 76 units comprising 2B+G+MF+27UF+TF with a built up area of 23,226.59 Sqm. Ht of the building is 99.80 m. 3. Land use details: Total plot area - 4,324.38 Sq.mts Net site area after road widening - 3,835.14 Sqm 31

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

Built up area - 23,226.59 Sqm. Green belt area - 1316.93 Sqm (34.34%) Ground coverage - 708.58 Sqm (18.48%) Roads and open area - 1809.63 Sqm (47.19%)

FAR is permissible is 4.25 and achieved is 4.25 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 63.59 KLD (43.07 KLD Fresh water +20.52 KLD recycled water). The source of water is BWSSB. NOC from BWSSB not submitted. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 60.41 KLD (considering 95% sewage) and treated in STP design capacity of 65 KLD with SBR technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management:The total Earth work generate is 4273.50 cum Backfilling for footings is 1282.05Cum Backfilling for retaining wall is 493.14 Cum For landscaping is 428.76 Cum Fillings for internal Roads is 2069.55 Cum 7. Solid Waste Management: The solid waste generated will be segregated is 182.40 Kg/day. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 342 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 1x450 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: Parking provided is 175 PCU. Road width in front of the project site is 21 m 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. EMP baseline data not submitted. Kempambudi lake is 0.82 Km (S); Lalbagh lake is 1.8 km (SE) and BWSSB Water tank is 0.50 Kms (NW). 11. Other details: Roof top rain water collected in terrace rain water collection sumps and ground water will be recharged through 6 Nos of recharge pits.

The proponent and environmental consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required information/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the Statutory Application- Form I, IA, conceptual plan and information provided during the meeting. During the presentation the committee observed that there is a discrepancy in the excavated earth management submitted in the application and presentation. The committee asked the proponent to submit the revised excavated earth management and its utilization within the project site.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to submission of revised excavated earth management and its utilization within the project site and NOC from BWSSB.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

32

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

167.19 Expansion of Residential Apartment Project at Sy.No.85/3 of Tannisandra Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of M/s. JUST NATURAL, No.33, Chamundinagar, R.T.Nagar, Bangalore. (SEIAA 88 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. JUST NATURAL, Environmental Consultant: Sri. Mahadevaswamy. P (obtained stay from the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka) Latitude: 130 03’44.57”N; Longitude: 770 37’5744”E M/s. JUST NATURAL, have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their expansion of residential apartment project at Sy.No.85/3 of Tannisandra Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. The project cost is Rs. 75 Crores.

The project has obtained BDA approval vide No. 0264/2013-2014 for built up area of 17,630.05 Sqm for 130 No. of flats. Now the proposal is for expansion of the built up area of 25,836.33 Sqm consisting 158 Nos of units with configuration of 2B+G+7UF. Comparative statement of the project proposal as per the BDA approval & present proposal for EC is given below:

Sl. Description BDA approved plan Present proposal No 1 Type of Residential apartgment Residential apartgment development 2 Plot area 5,065.49 Sqm 5,065.49 Sqm 3 Built Up Area 17,630.05 Sqm 25,836.33 Sqm 4 Configuration 2B+G+4UF 2B+G+7UF 5 Water requirement 88 KLD (BWSSB) 110 KLD (BWSSB) 6 Waste water 75 KLD 93.5 KLD generation 7 STP capacity 100 KLD

1. Land use details: Green belt area - 1,445.35 Sqm (28.53%)

Ground coverage allowed is 50% and achieved is 43.06% 2. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 110 KLD (73 KLD Fresh water +37 KLD recycled water). The source of water is BWSSB. NOC from BWSSB not submitted. 3. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 93.5 KLD (considering 85% sewage) and treated in STP design capacity of 100 KLD with SBR technology. 4. Excavated Earth Management:The total Earth work generate is 8000 cum which is embarked separately at the site and shall be reused for the internal roads and filling low-lying areas inside the project premises and for landscaping. 5. Solid Waste Management: The solid waste generated will be segregated is 356 Kg/day. Organic waste is 214 Kg/day and inorganic waste is 142 kg/day. 33

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

STP sludge generated is 10 kg/day which will be used as manure in landscape. 6. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1000 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 1x500 KVA and 1x200 KVA. 7. Traffic Details: Parking required is 209 and provided is 210 PCU. 8. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. EMP baseline data not submitted. 9. Other details: Roof top rain water collected in terrace rain water collection sumps and ground water will be recharged through 7 Nos of recharge pits.

The proponent and environmental consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required information/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the Statutory Application- Form I, IA, conceptual plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

167.20 Residential Apartment Project at Sy.Nos.51/1, 52, 53/1, 53/2, 53/3 & 54/1 of Akkupete Village, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Rural District of M/s. KRISHNAJA CONSTRUCTIONS, G-25, Sahakaranagara, Behind The Big Market, Bangalore - 560092. (SEIAA 89 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. KRISHNAJA CONSTRUCTIONS, Environmental Consultant: Sri. Lohith Kumar H.N (obtained stay from the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka) M/s. KRISHNAJA CONSTRUCTIONS, have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their residential apartment project at Sy.Nos.51/1, 52, 53/1, 53/2, 53/3 & 54/1 of Akkupete Village, Devanahalli Taluk, Bangalore Rural District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. 1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 25191.33 Sq.mts. area left for road widening is 1744.27 Sqm. Net plot area is 23,447.06 Sqm. 2. Project configuration: The project consists of 550 Units having built up area of 67,993.75 Sqm with a configuration of Block A- B+Stilt+GF+11UF+TF, Block B – B+Stilt+GF+10UF+TF and a club house of GF+3UF. Ht of the building is 39.85 m. 3. Land use details: Total plot area - 25191.33 Sq.mts Net site area after road widening - 23,447.06 Sqm Built up area - 67,993.75 Sqm. Green belt area - 8313.13 Sqm (33%) Roads and open area - 10378.82 Sqm (41.2%)

FAR is permissible is 2.00 and achieved is 2.00 34

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 409 KLD. The source of water is Borewell. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 389 KLD (considering 95% sewage) and treated in STP design capacity of 400 KLD with SBR technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management:The total Earth work generate is 49018 cum For landscaping is 4156.56 Cum. Balance excavated earth will be used for road widening purpose and for all round the compound walls. 7. Solid Waste Management: The solid waste generated will be segregated is 1375 Kg/day. Organic is 825 Kg/day and inorganic is 550 Kg/day. STP sludge is 40 Kg/day will be dewatered and used as manure for gardening. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1547 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 1x250 KVA, 1x175 KVA and 1x82.5 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: Parking provided is 578 PCU. Road width in front of the project site is 18 m 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. EMP baseline data not submitted. 11. Other details: Roof top rain water collected in terrace rain water collection sumps with a capacity of 50 Cum and ground water will be recharged through pits provided around the periphery of the project site.

Note: 1. as per the land conversion, there is a nala on the western side of the project site. They have provided 12 m set back from the nala.

The proponent and environmental consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required information/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the Statutory Application- Form I, IA, conceptual plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The Committee noted that a nala is passing adjacent to the project site. The proponent stated that the project site is in BMRDA limits as per the norms 12 m set back has been provided. The proponent has submitted the NOC from TMC during the meeting.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to submission of the following information:

1. Revised excavated earth management details and its utilization within the project site 2. Scheme for RO disposal 3. An undertaking that before drawing the water from borewell Ground Water Authority permission will be obtained 4. Village map to be given

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

35

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

167.21 Residential Apartment Project at Municipal No.3, BBMP ward No.25, (Earlier being portion of Sy.No.9/2) of Kothanur Village, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District of M/s. August Ventures Pvt. Ltd., #17/1 of Campbell Road, Bengaluru.(SEIAA 90 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. August Ventures Pvt. Ltd., Environmental Consultant: M/s. Ramky Enviro Engineers (NABET accredited organization) M/s. August Ventures Pvt. Ltd., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their residential apartment project at Municipal No.3, BBMP ward No.25, (Earlier being portion of Sy.No.9/2) of Kothanur Village, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. The total project cost is 40 Crores 1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 6070.29 Sq.mts. 2. Project configuration: The proposed project consists of 122 flats compring B+G+14UF with a total built up area of 27999.20 Sqm. Ht of the building is 44.95 m. 3. Land use details: Total plot area - 6070.29 Sq.mts Built up area - 27999.20 Sqm. Green belt area - 1332.31 Sqm (34.62% including podium) Green area on podium - 769.09 Sqm Ground coverage - 6070.29 Sqm (25.33%)

FAR is permissible is 3.25 and achieved is .3.229 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 100 KLD (64 KLD fresh water + 36 KLD recycled water). The source of water is BWSSB. NOC from BWSSB submitted. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 80 KLD (considering 80% sewage) and treated in STP design capacity of 80 KLD with SBR technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management:The total Earth work generate is 18784 cum Backfilling to be done on the backside of regaining wall and underground tanks is 1000 Cum, filling up low lying areas at the site is 1000 cum; backfilling between the foundations is 4000 cum and top soil of 4000 cum will be used for landscape development. 7. Solid Waste Management: The solid waste generated will be segregated is 327 Kg/day. Organic is 196 Kg/day and inorganic is 131Kg/day. STP sludge is 10 Kg/day will be dewatered and used as manure for gardening. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 1103 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 2x250 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: Traffic Details submitted. Parking provided is 141 PCU. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. EMP baseline data not submitted. Kalkere lake -1.71 Km; Rachenahali lake – 3.30 km; Sampigehalli lake – 3.20 km; Nagavara lake – 4.15 km;

36

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

11. Other details: Roof top rain water collected in terrace rain water collection sumps with a capacity of 1x150 Cum and 2x 10 Cum and ground water will be recharged through pits provided around the periphery of the project site.

The proponent and environmental consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required information/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the Statutory Application- Form I, IA, conceptual plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. Revised excavated earth management details and its utilization within the project site 2. Baseline data for all the parameters

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC after submission of the above information.

167.22 Office Building Project at Sy.Nos.4/1B, 4/1C, 4/1D & 4/1E of Binna Mangala Kaval, K.R.Pura Hobli, OLD Madras Road (NH-4), Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of M/s. Puravankara Projects Limited, #130/1, Ulsoor Road, BangaloreSEIAA 91 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. Puravankara Projects Limited Environmental Consultant: Smt. Pooja Raslana (obtained stay from the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka) Latitude: 120 59’14.77”N; Longitude: 770 38’49.15”E M/s. Puravankara Projects Limited have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their office building project at Sy.Nos.4/1B, 4/1C, 4/1D & 4/1E of Binna Mangala Kaval, K.R.Pura Hobli, OLD Madras Road (NH-4), Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore Urban District 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. 1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 15695.37 Sq.mts. 2. Project configuration: construction of office building comprising of 3B+G+11UF with a total BUA of 78189.67 Sqm. Maximum ht of the building is 50.775 m 3. Land use details: Total plot area - 15695.37 Sq.mts Built up area - 78189.67 Sqm. Green belt area a) park & open spaces 1573.5 Sqm (10.03%) b) gross pavers (true earth) 2122.83 Sqm (13.53%) c) lawn on podium 516.97 Sqm (3.29%) d) on true land 964.70 Sqm (6.08%) Ground coverage - 4532.44 Sqm (28.88%)

37

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

Fire drive+paved area - 5333.69 Sqm (33.98%)

FAR area is 56470.04 and achieved is 3.999 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 271 KLD (90 KLD Fresh water +180.5 KLD recycled water). The source of water is BWSSB. NOC from BWSSB not submitted. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 244 KLD (considering 90% sewage) and treated in STP design capacity of 250 KLD with SBR technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management:The total Earth work generate is 26000 cum which will be used for backfilling, retaining wall sides, road levelling and formation forks. 7. Solid Waste Management: The solid waste generated will be segregated is 1203 Kg/day. Organic is 361.02 kg/day, inorganic is 842.38 kg/day and e- waste is 3.5 kg/day. Sludge generated from the STP is 29 Kg/day which will be reused as manure within the site for landscaping/greenbelt development. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 4450 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 4x1500 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: Parking required is 1129 and provided is 1136 PCU. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. EMP baseline data submitted. Binniganahalli lake is 2 km from the project site(NE); and Bagemane lake is 1 km (SE) 11. Other details: Roof top rain water collected in 2 No of terrace rain water collection sumps of capacity of 85 Cum and ground water will be recharged through 8 Nos of recharge pits.

The proponent and environmental consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required information/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the Statutory Application- Form I, IA, conceptual plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to submission of the following information:

1. Village map 2. Quantification of the terrace area available for harnessing solar energy and an appropriate plan thereof with due calculations. 3. BWSSB approval for water supply 4. CFL to be replaced with the LED

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

38

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

[ 167.23 Modification of Residential Apartment Project at Khata No. 63/1/78, Sy. No. 78 of Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District of M/s. Unishire Homes LLP, No. 6, Kasturi Nivas, 1st Floor, 3rd Main Road, 5th Block, Kumara Park (West),Bengaluru -560020.(SEIAA 92 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. Unishire Homes LLP Environmental Consultant: Sri. M.D. Sanjay Kumar (obtained stay from the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka) Latitude: 130 03’28.67”N; Longitude: 770 37’45.49”E M/s. Unishire Homes LLP have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their Modification of residential apartment project at Khata No. 63/1/78, Sy. No. 78 of Thanisandra Village, K.R.Puram Hobli, Bengaluru East Taluk, Bengaluru Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Project cost is 50 crores.

The project has got Environmental Clearance from SEIAA vide letter No. SEIAA 98 CON 2012 dated 15.09.2012 for the built up area of 45,956 Sqm and 196 Nos of units with 2B+G+13UF on a plot area of 11072.65 Sqm. (earlier EC and compliance submitted)

Comparative statement for the earlier EC and now proposing is given below:

Sl. Details As per the earlier EC Proposing Remarks No 1 Type of the project Residential Residential No change apartment apartment 2 Site area 11.072.65 Sqm 11325.05 Sqm +252.4 Sqm including Kharab land of 252.40 Sqm) 3 Built up area 45,956 Sqm 44,000 Sqm -5,956 Sqm 4 No of units 196 182 -14 5 Building 2B+G+13UF B+G+14UF Reduced one configuration basement and one additional upper floor. 6 Ht of the building 44.95 45.00 7 Car parking 301 285 -16 8 Water 132 KLD 123 KLD -9 KLD consumption 9 Waste water 105 KLD 123 KLD +18 KLD generated 10 Capacity of STP 110 KLD 150 KLD +40 KLD 11 Capacity of roof 40 Cum 40 Cum No change rain water harvesting sump 39

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

12 Recharge pits 15 11 -4 13 No. of DG sets 500KVA x 2 320 KVA x 2 provided 14 Estimated cost 50 Crores 50 Crores No change

1. Construction stage: construction work has been started as per the previous Environmental clearance. 2. Land use details: Green belt area - 3418.50 Sqm (30.87%) Ground coverage - 3493.63 Sqm (31.55%) Driveway/pathway area - 4160.52 Sqm (37.58%)

FAR available is 3.60 and achieved is 2.78 3. Excavated Earth Management: The excavated earth has been re-used within the site for backfilling, road formation and site formation. The excavated top soil is stored for reusing it for landscaping. 4. Solid Waste Management: The solid waste generated will be segregated is 410 Kg/day. Organic is 246 kg/day and inorganic is 164 kg/day Sludge generated from the STP is 15 Kg/day which will be reused as manure within the site for landscaping/greenbelt development. 5. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. EMP baseline data submitted. Rachenahalli lake is 1.2 km; Nagavara lake is 2.3 km. Note: structural stability certificate from Innotech Engineering consult (P) Ltd given

The proponent and environmental consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required information/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the Statutory Application- Form I, IA, conceptual plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

167.24 Expansion of Commercial Building Project at Sy.Nos.193, 193, 199, 200, 201, 202 & 203 of Village, Begur Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of M/s. SJR Prime Corporation Pvt. Ltd., SJR Primus, #1, Industrial Layout, , 7th Block, Bangalore – 560095 (SEIAA 93 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. SJR Prime Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Environmental Consultant: Sri. Mohammad Habibilla (obtained stay from the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka) Latitude: 120 89’15.85”N; Longitude: 770 59’63.59”E M/s. SJR Prime Corporation Pvt. Ltd., have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their expansion of commercial project at Sy.Nos.193, 193, 199, 200, 201, 202 & 203 of Bilekahalli Village, Begur Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore 40

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Project cost is 95 crores.

The project has got Environmental Clearance from SEIAA vide letter No. SEIAA 20 CON 2011 dated 26.04.2011 for construction of SJR spectrum commercial building consisting of 3B+G+9UF with a total built up area of 1,11,188.94 sqm on a plot area of 26,102.22 Sqm. (earlier EC and compliance submitted)

Comparative statement for the earlier EC and now proposing is given below:

Sl. Details As per the earlier EC Proposing Remarks No 1 Type of the project Commercial Commercial development building consisting of office space, retail, food court, cinema & hotel of 100 rooms 2 Site area 26,102.22 Sqm 26,102.22 Sqm No change area left for road widening is 1106.27 Sqm. Net site area is 25394.03 Sqm 3 Built up area 1,11,188.94 Sqm 1,38,775.43 Sqm +27,586.49Sqm 4 Building 3B+G+9UF Block-A Changes in the configuration 2B+G+6UF and configuration Block –B 3B+G+12UF 5 Car parking 1573 1855 +282 6 Water 364 KLD 489 KLD +125 KLD consumption 7 Waste water 292 KLD 440KLD +148 KLD generated 8 Capacity of STP 300 KLD 500 KLD +200 KLD 9 Estimated cost 75 Crores 95 Crores +20 Crores 1. Construction stage: construction work has been started as per the previous Environmental clearance. 2. Land use details: Green belt area - 8379 Sqm (33%) 3. Excavated Earth Management: There is no excavation because there is no change in plot coverage only changes in built up area and No. of floors. 4. Solid Waste Management: The solid waste generated will be segregated is 1220 Kg/day. Organic is 730 kg/day and inorganic is 490 kg/day Sludge

41

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

generated from the STP is 25 Kg/day which will be reused as manure within the site for landscaping/greenbelt development. 5. Energy requirement: Total energy requirement for the project is 5709 KW and will be sourced from BESCOM. 5x1500 KVA and 3x1010 KVA back up DG will be provided. 6. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. EMP baseline data not submitted. Arakere lake is 1 km; Puttenahalli lake is 1 km and Sarakki lake is 2 km.

The proponent and environmental consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required information/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the Statutory Application- Form I, IA, conceptual plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that the proposal is for and vertical expansion adding three floors to the existing 3B+G+9UF. Also the water requirement calculations not done as per the NBC standards.

The committee after discussion decided to reconsider the proposal after submission of the following information:

1. The structural stability certificate of the building from the third party to ascertain the load bearing capacity of the predesigned structure in view of the proposed construction above the already approved structure. 2. Revised water balance chart calculating the water demand as per the NBC standards

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal after submission of the above information. [

167.25 Residential Apartment Project at Sy.Nos.314/2, 314/1, 314/7 & 375/10 of Begur Village & Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of M/s. SONA HEIGHTS, #71, Sona Towers, Millers Road, Bangalore - 560052. (SEIAA 94 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. SONA HEIGHTS, Environmental Consultant: Sri. Dodda Mudde Gowda K.S (obtained stay from the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka) Latitude: 120 88’08.46”N; Longitude: 770 61’90.63”E M/s. SONA HEIGHTS, have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their residential apartment project at Sy.Nos.314/2, 314/1, 314/7 & 375/10 of Begur Village & Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk, Bangalore Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total project cost is 100 Crores 1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 36725.92 Sq.mts. Kharab area is 404.68 Sqm and net site area is 36320.23 Sqm 2. Project configuration: The construction project consists of 601 Nos of units comprising B+G+4 UF with a total built up area of 95,504.63 Sqm. Ht of the building is 14.9 m. 3. Land use details: Total plot area - 36725.92 Sq.mts 42

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

Built up area - 95,504.63 Sqm. Green belt area - 11955.9 Sqm (33%) Paved area (drive way) & service area - 9883.8 Sqm (27.15%) Ground coverage is - 12659.07 Sqm (34.85 %) Civic amenities - 5821.43 Sqam (5.01%)

FAR permissible is 2.0 and achieved is 1.98 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 410 KLD (246 KLD Fresh water +150 KLD recycled water). The source of water is BWSSB. NOC from BWSSB not submitted. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 370 KLD (considering 90% sewage) and treated in STP design capacity of 1x235 KLD and 1x150 KLD with SBR technology. 6. Excavated Earth Management:The total Earth work generate is 70000 cum which will be used within the project site for landscaping of gardens and road making etc. 7. Solid Waste Management: The solid waste generated will be segregated is 1352 Kg/day. Organic is 811 kg/day and inorganic is 541 kg/day Sludge generated from the STP is 8 Kg/day which will be reused as manure within the site for landscaping/greenbelt development. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 4731 KVA is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 1x340 KVA and 2x500 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: Parking required is 618 and provided is 618 PCU. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. Begur lake is 1 km from the project site. 11. Other details: Roof top rain water collected in terrace rain water collection sumps of capacity of 250 Cum and storm water produced within the site will be directed to recharge pits provided around the periphery of the site.

The proponent and environmental consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required information/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the Statutory Application- Form I, IA, conceptual plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to submission of the BWSSB NOC.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

167.26 Commercial Building Project at Municipal No.New No.3, 1st Cross Road, Sudhamanagara, J.C.Road, Ward No.48, Bangalore – 560001 of Mr. Rajendra Kumar Jain, No.S-7, 2nd Floor, Esteem Arcade, #26, Race Course Road, Bangalore - 560001.(SEIAA 95 CON 2016) Name of Applicant: - Mr. Rajendra Kumar Jain, Environmental Consultant: Sri. Dodda Mudde Gowda K.S (obtained stay from the

43

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka) Latitude: 120 57’45.11”N; Longitude: 770 35’11.94”E Mr. Rajendra Kumar Jain, have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their commercial building project at Municipal No.New No.3, 1st Cross Road, Sudhamanagara, J.C.Road, Ward No.48, Bangalore – 560001 under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Total project cost is 100 Crores 1. Land details: - Total Plot area is 9175 Sq.mts. 2. Project configuration: The construction commercial building in Tower A – 3B+G+15UF and Tower B – 2B+G+11UF with a total built up area of 64,998.5 Sqm. Ht of the building is 57.60 m. 3. Land use details: Total plot area - 9175 Sq.mts Built up area - 64,998.5 Sqm. Green belt area - 1835 Sqm (20%) Paved area (drive way) & service area - 4264.34 Sqm (46.48%) Ground coverage is - 3075.66 Sqm (33.52 %) FAR permissible 3.0 +1.8 for additional land amalgamation and achieved is

4.7 4. Water Requirement: Total water requirement is 216 KLD (141 KLD Fresh water +75 KLD recycled water). The source of water is BWSSB. NOC from BWSSB not submitted. 5. Wastewater Management: - The total quantity of waste water generated is 200 KLD (considering 90% sewage) and treated in STP design capacity of 130 KLD with SBR technology as per the water balance chart. 6. Excavated Earth Management:The total Earth work generate is 57000 cum which will be used within the project site for landscaping of gardens and road making etc and some portion will be stored in their nearby property. 7. Solid Waste Management: The solid waste generated will be segregated is 1440 Kg/day. Organic is 864 kg/day and inorganic is 576 kg/day Sludge generated from the STP is 10 Kg/day which will be reused as manure within the site for landscaping/greenbelt development. 8. Energy Requirement: Total power requirement of 100 KW is sourced from BESCOM; Backup power proposed is DG sets with a capacity of 3x2000 KVA. 9. Traffic Details: Parking required is 881 and provided is 908 PCU. 10. Environment sensitivity: EMP submitted. EMP baseline data not submitted. 11. Other details: Roof top rain water collected in terrace rain water collection sumps of capacity of 50 Cum and storm water produced within the site will be directed to recharge pits provided around the periphery of the site.

The proponent and environmental consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required information/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the Statutory Application- Form I, IA, conceptual plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. Committee noted that there is a discrepancy in the water balance chart submitted in the application. 44

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of Environmental Clearance subject to submission of the following information:

1. BWSSB NOC. 2. Revised earth work calculation and its utilization within the project site 3. Revised water balance chart

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

167.27 Dolomite Mine Project at Sy.No.63/1 (P) of Thimmapur Village, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District (2.43 Ha) (M.L. No.2663) of Sri Ningangouda A Patil, Kanasageri Post, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District.(SEIAA 93 MIN 2016)

This is an expansion proposal submitted by Sri Ningangouda A Patil seeking Environmental clearance for Dolomite mining project in an area of 2.43 Ha at Sy.No.63/1 (P) of Thimmapur Village, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot District. The production is 40000 TPA.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Dr. S.K/ Myageri and approved by Regional Controller of Mines, Margao, Goa.

The proponent submitted the following information:

1. Pre-feasibility report along with the EMP. 2. Lease expiring on 24.01.2016. lease granted on 15.06.2011. 3. IBM Approved mining plan for Timmapur Limestone and Dolomite mine dated 07.08.2013.

Land use details: out of 2.430 Ha, area to be excavated is 1.643 Ha, for Mineral storage 0.068 Ha, for Infrastructure 0.005 Ha, for Roads 0.156 Ha, for green belt 0.065 Ha, for mineral separation plant 0.025 Ha, and for others 0.468 Ha. The production of Dolomite is 40,000 TPA.

Note: The quarry plan has been approved for Limestone and Dolomite where the production is shown only for Dolomite which is the minor mineral.

The environmental consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required information/additional information.

The committee observed that the proposal is for production of Dolomite which is the minor mineral as per the Gazette Notification No. S.O. 423 (E) dated 10.02.2015. Hence the committee advised the environmental consultant to get the quarry plan approved only for Dolomite and submit the application to DEIAA for Environmental Clearance.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for closure.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

45

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

167.28 Limestone & Dolomite Mine Project at Sy.No.94 (P) of Lokapur Village, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot Distrct (4.86 Ha) (M. L. No.2662) of Sri N R Sidnal (SEIAA 164 MIN 2016)

This is an expansion proposal submitted by Sri N R Sidnal seeking Environmental clearance for Lime stone and Dolomite mining project in an area of 4.86 Ha at Sy.No.94 (P) of Lokapur Village, Mudhol Taluk, Bagalkot Distrct. The production is 20000 TPA.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Dr. S.K/ Myageri and approved by Regional Controller of Mines, Margao, Goa.

The proponent submitted the following information:

1. Pre-feasibility report along with the EMP. 2. Lease granted on 29.03.2011 for 20 years effecting from 06.06.2011. 3. IBM Approved mining plan dated 09.03.2016.

The proponent was invited to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent.

The Committee decided to provide one more opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC in subsequent meeting.

167.29 Iron Ore Mining Project of Narayanapura Village, Sandur Taluk, Ballari District (40.47 Ha) of M/s. M. Hanumantha Rao (SEIAA 165 MIN 2016)

The proposal has been deferred since the proposal has not been received from the Authority.

167.30 Manganese Mine Project at Sy.No.381/A of Kadathi Village, Alagilavada Reserve Forest in Harapanahalli Taluk, Davanagere District (2.02 Ha) (M.L.No.1616) of M/s. Yerrithatha Mining Company (SEIAA 166 MIN 2016)

This is an expansion proposal submitted by M/s. Yerrithatha Mining Company seeking Environmental clearance for Manganese Mine Project in an area of 2.02 Ha at Sy.No.381/A of Kadathi Village, Alagilavada Reserve Forest in Harapanahalli Taluk, Davanagere.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP M/s. Global Environment & Mining Services and approved by Regional Controller of Mines, Bangalore.

The proponent submitted the following information:

1. Pre-feasibility report along with the EMP. 2. Lease granted on 3rd August 1979 for 16 years. Renewal application submitted on 24.11.2014. MOEF has given Stage – I approval of diversion of forest land through letter no. F.No.4-KRC1057/2015-BAN 7814 Dated 23rd December 2015. The PCCF (Head of Forest Force), Bangalore, through letter No. A5(1).MNG.CR.47/2008-09 46

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

Dated 29-04-2016, has requested Addl.Chief Secretary, FEE, M.S.Building, to move the proposal to Govt. of India for according Stage – II approval and as verified from the records, the proposal has not been sent to Govt. of India for the stage-II approval. The DMG has proposed to extend the lease period up to 02-08-2029 if the deemed extension of diversion of forest land is granted. Therefore, the extension of lease period is still under consideration. 3. IBM Approved mining plan for Kadathi Manganese Mine dated 04.05.2016.

Land use details: out of 2.02 Ha, area to be excavated is 0.70 Ha, for Mineral storage 0.02 Ha, for green belt 0.37 Ha, for area for dumping is 0.56 Ha, area for sub grade 0.02 Ha, and unused area is 0.33 Ha. The total production of Manganese is 90,183 T.

The proponent and environmental consultant Sri. Dhanraj Bharathi Narasimha (obtained stay from the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka) attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required information/additional information.

The committee screened the proposal considering the information provided in the Statutory Application- Form I, prefeasibility report proposed ToRs and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee decided to consider the proposal under B1 category as the proposed project is for mining of major mineral.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of standard ToRs along with the following additional ToRs to conduct the EIA studies in accordance with the EIA Notification 2006 and relevant guidelines.

1. Status of the Stage-II clearance from MoEF 2. Lot of earth will be generated as waste for this scheme for waste handling and disposal to be explained 3. Scheme for protection of flora and fauna in the adjacent land 4. Fire protection measures taken 5. Scheme for conservation, moisture and preventive measures taken for soil 6. Cumulative impact on the environment from the proposed activity

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

167.31 Manganese Mine Project at Sy.No.381/A of Kadathi Village, Alagilavada Reserve Forest in Harapanahalli Taluk, Davanagere District (12.56 Ha) (M.L.No.1783) of M/s. Yerrithatha Mining Company (SEIAA 167 MIN 2016)

This is an expansion proposal submitted by M/s. Yerrithatha Mining Company seeking Environmental clearance for Manganese Mine Project in an area of 12.56 Ha at Sy.No.381/A of Kadathi Village, Alagilavada Reserve Forest in Harapanahalli Taluk, Davanagere. It is in Reserved Forest land.

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP M/s. Global Environment & Mining Services and approved by Regional Controller of Mines, Bangalore.

47

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

The proponent submitted the following information:

1. Pre-feasibility report along with the EMP. 2. Lease granted on 18th September 1981 for 20 years. MOEF has given Stage – I approval of diversion of forest land through letter no. F.No.4-KRC1057/2015-BAN 7814 Dated 23rd December 2015. The PCCF (Head of Forest Force), Bangalore, through letter No. A5(1).MNG.CR.47/2008-09 Dated 29-04-2016, has requested Addl.Chief Secretary, FEE, M.S.Building, to move the proposal to Govt. of India for according Stage – II approval and as verified from the records, the proposal has not been sent to Govt. of India for the stage-II approval. The DMG has proposed to extend the lease period up to 02-08-2029 if the deemed extension of diversion of forest land is granted. Therefore, the extension of lease period is still under consideration. 3. The Indian Bureau of Mines through it’s order No. 281/58/2011/BNG/398 dated 03-01-2012, has suspended the mining activity due to violation and there is no record available regarding revoking of the said order in the application. 4. IBM Approved mining plan for Kadathi Manganese Mine dated 01.04.2016.

Land use details: out of 12.56 Ha, area to be excavated is 0.70 Ha, for Mineral storage 0.50 Ha, for green belt 0.75 Ha, for area for dumping is 1.76 Ha, area for sub grade 0.20 Ha, area for crushing plant 0.50 Ha, 0.32 Ha for roads, 1.50 Ha for afforestation, 0.07 Ha for statutory buildings and unused area is 6.26 Ha. The total production of Manganese is 91128T.

The proponent and environmental consultant Sri. Dhanraj Bharathi Narasimha (obtained stay from the Hon’ble High Court of Karnataka) attended the meeting of SEAC to provide required information/additional information.

The committee screened the proposal considering the information provided in the Statutory Application- Form I, prefeasibility report proposed ToRs and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee decided to consider the proposal under B1 category as the proposed project is for mining of major mineral.

The committee after discussion decided to recommend the proposal to SEIAA for issue of standard ToRs along with the following additional ToRs to conduct the EIA studies in accordance with the EIA Notification 2006 and relevant guidelines.

1. Status of the Stage-II clearance from MoEF 2. List of violations noted by the IBM and reasons to be explained. 3. Lot of earth will be generated as waste for this scheme for waste handling and disposal to be explained 4. Scheme for protection of flora and fauna in the adjacent land 5. Fire protection measures taken 6. Scheme for conservation, moisture and preventive measures taken for soil 7. Cumulative impact on the environment from the proposed activity

Action: Secretary, SEAC to forward the proposal to SEIAA for further necessary action.

48

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

167.32 Building Stone Quarry Proejct at Sy.No.142(P) of Aralalusandra Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District (14-20 Acres) of Smt. B.P.Swetha, No.13, "Matha", 60 feet road, Amarajyothi Nagar, Vijayanagar, Bengaluru - 40. (SEIAA 172 MIN 2016)

This is a new proposal submitted by Smt. B.P.Swetha seeking Environmental clearance for building stone quarry Project in an area of 14.20 Acres at Sy.No.142(P) of Aralalusandra Village, Kanakapura Taluk, Ramanagara District

The mining plan has been prepared by RQP Sri. B. Ramasubba Reddy and approved by Deputy Director, Department of Mines and Geology, Ramanagar.

The proponent submitted the following information:

1. Pre-feasibility report along with the EMP. 2. Quarry plan approved on 08.06.2016. 3. DMG Notification dated 23.02.2016 for 20 years.

Land use details: out of 14-20 Acres, area to be excavated is 11-9 Acres, mineral storage is 0-3 acres, infrastructure is 0-03 acres, roads is 0-2 Acres, green belt is 1-3 acres and M- sand crushing plan is 2-0 acres. The production is 22,36,490 TPA.

The proponent was invited to provide required clarification. The proponent remained absent with intimation.

The Committee decided to provide one more opportunity to proponent with intimation that the proposal will be appraised based on merit in his absence, in case he remains absent.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC in subsequent meeting.

167.33 Expansion of "BRENTWOOD" Residential Apartment Porject at Sy.Nos.65/1, 65/2 and 65/3 of Thubarahalli Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of M/s. Vaswani Estates Developers Pvt. Ltd., Vaswani Victoria, 30, Victoria Road, Bangalore-560047. (SEIAA 26 CON 2016)

Name of Applicant: - M/s. Vaswani Estates Developers Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Vaswani Estates Developers Pvt. Ltd.,have applied for Environmental clearance from SEIAA for their Expansion of "BRENTWOOD" Residential Apartment Porject at Sy.Nos.65/1, 65/2 and 65/3 of Thubarahalli Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore Urban District under 8(a) of schedule EIA Notification – 2006 under category B. Expansion Project cost is 6 Crores.

It is a proposal of expansion for which Environmental Clearance has been obtained by SEIAA vide letter No. SEIAA 200 CON 2011 dated 08.03.2012. Comparative statement of the project between earlier EC issued and proposed expansion is given below:

49

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

The Proponent and Environment Consultant attended the meeting of SEAC to provide clarification/additional information.

The committee appraised the proposal considering the information provided in the statutory application-Form I, Form-1A, Conceptual Plan and clarification/additional information provided during the meeting. The committee observed that the construction work is already started and the proponent have deviated the sanctioned plan for which the proponent failed to explain. Hence the committee decided to inspect the site to know ground reality.

Accordingly the sub-committee has visited the sites on 03.06.2016 along with the Scientific Officer, Ecology and Environment Department and submitted the site inspection report. The committee perused the report and accepted the same. Following is the site inspection report:

50

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

Date of visit;03-06-2016

Members visited;

1. Sri N Naganna Chairman 2. Dr K C Jayaramu Member

Officials present:

1. Sri B S Chandrashekar Scientific Officer Gr.1

Proponent and his representatives

1. Sri Gururaj Project manager, M/s vaswani Estates Developers. 2. Sri Sriharsha Environmental Consultant 3. Sri Hanumantharaju Assistant Environmental Consultant

File under consideration:

Expansion of "BRENTWOOD" Residential Apartment Porject at Sy.Nos.65/1, 65/2 and 65/3 of Thubarahalli Varthur Hobli, Bangalore East Taluk, Bangalore Urban District of M/s. Vaswani Estates Developers Pvt. Ltd., Vaswani Victoria, 30, Victoria Road, Bangalore-560047. (SEIAA 26 CON 2016)

The committee members noted supra visited the site on 03-06-2016 to have first hand information and to understand the ground reality before appraising the proposal. During the site visit, the committee had a meeting with the representative of the proponent, Sri Gururaj, Project manager and Sri Sri Harsha, Environmental consultant. During the discussion, the project manager has informed the committee that, changes with respect to earlier issued EC were effected in 3rd & 4th floor connecting towers ‘A’ & ‘D’ and in the 13th and 14th floor of the building. After the discussion, the committee inspected the works and observed that, the construction was carried out as per modification and the work is nearing completion. The details of changes made were as below.

Sl.No As per earlier issued EC As per modification 1 In 3rd floor, in the connecting The sit outs provided in the bridge bridge between tower A’ & ‘D’, portion and on western side were two units with independent sit removed and two additional units, one outs in the connecting bridge and on each side (tower ‘A’ & ‘D’) were on western side is provided. added. 2 In 4th floor, the sit out portion The open terrace was utilized and two were removed and instead left additional units, one on each side (tower open as terrace. ‘A’ & ‘D’) were added. 3 In 13th floor, in each towers ‘A’, In tower ‘D’ on southern side, two ‘B’, ‘C’ & ‘D’, 4 duplex units are duplex units and in tower ‘C’ one unit 51

167th SEAC meeting proceedings 1st and 2nd July 2016

provided.(total units is 16) with duplex on North Western side were retained and in the remaining 13 units, duplex provision has been changed and in duplex portion, an addition of 13 units in 14th floor were provided. 4 In the club house, in squash court The squash court roof ht. is doubled and is provided with a single ht. roof. a staircase with a viewers gallery is provided 5 A temple is provided within the premises.

The project manager informed that, there is no structural change and the column and beam position were not changed and with rearrangement of internal walls, the above modifications were made. The committee observed that, due to these modifications, there is marginal increase in built up area and no change in structural drawing and the modification is done with internal changes by altering the position of the walls and in the club portion, the roof ht. in squash court area is doubled with a provision of stair case and viewers gallery. Though there is an increase in built up area the proponents have made many modifications in the drawings approved at the time of issuing of EC and without getting modified/amendment to EC, the proponents have carried out the work which is a violation of EIA Notification 2006.

Recommendations of the Committee The committee decided to report the violation to SEIAA and recommends to take credible action against the proponent as per the rules.

Action: Secretary, SEAC to put up the proposal before SEAC in subsequent meeting.

Member Secretary, SEIAA was kind enough to participate in the SEAC deliberations during which the SEAC had fruitful discussions, and sought clarification about certain issues and arrived at following conclusions:

1. Since the NGT order No. 222 of 2014 dated 4th May 2016 with respect to buffer zones around water bodies and Raja kaluve and nalas mentions the applicability of this order to city of Bangalore. Therefore it is decided to apply the order to projects coming under BBMP limits.

2. In the projects where violations of the statutory orders have occurred may be appraised in SEAC and then recommend for credible action by the SEIAA.

Meeting ended with thanks to the Chair.

Secretary, SEAC Chairman, SEAC Karnataka Karnataka 52