G Reen Pa G Es
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
State of the State Wisconsin Green Party Fall Meeting
State Of The State Wisconsin Green Party Fall Meeting By WIGP Co-Chair Dace Zeps The Wisconsin Green Party’s Fall Gathering will be hosted by the Waukesha Greens on Saturday November 11th. This is an especially important membership meeting, A lot has occurred since our Fall Gathering in Kenosha just after the presidential as we are coming up on local, state and federal elections. All members will have the election. Many old and several new WI Green Party members began the year with opportunity to participate in decisions affecting our party and discussions aimed at great energy. That energy carried through the Wisconsin Recount. We found some growing the WI Greens into the transformational political force that we need. disturbing things. Machine insecurity, inconsistant practices, and the large number of votes changed all pointed to a system that is broken. That didn’t even take into We’ll be discussing plans to grow our membership, recruit candidates, and build account all the ballots were not hand counted, making impossible to verify the vote dynamic and effective local chapters. We’ll consider changes to our state party in those counties. In March, we hosted the Voter Justice & Democratizing Elections constitution (see pages 6-7) including a proposal to increase representation of local Conference, and we continue to do the work of voter justice in coalition through chapters in the state coordinating council. We’ll also be electing officers, members Wisconsin Count My Vote. We have made a difference. of the coordinating council and delegates to the national party, as well as members of our caucuses (diversity, LGBTQIA, women’s, youth) and committees (membership, That energy is also being focused on issue advocacy, candidate development, and communications, elections, finance). -
Natural Resource Damage Valuation
Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 42 Issue 2 Issue 2 - March 1989 Article 1 3-1989 Natural Resource Damage Valuation Frank B. Cross Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Environmental Law Commons Recommended Citation Frank B. Cross, Natural Resource Damage Valuation, 42 Vanderbilt Law Review 269 (1989) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol42/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 42 MARCH 1989 NUMBER 2 Natural Resource Damage Valuation Frank B. Cross* Some consume beauty for gain; but all of us must consume it to live.1 I. INTRODUCTION ........................................... 270 II. LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR GOVERNMENT RECOVERY OF NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES ..................................... 273 A. Superfund ...................................... 273 B. The Clean Water Act and Other Federal Laws ..... 276 C. State Statutes and Common Law ................. 277 III. VALUES ATTRIBUTABLE TO NATURAL RESOURCES ........... 280 A . Use Value ...................................... 281 B. Existence Value ................................. 285 C. Intrinsic Value .................................. 292 D. Achieving a True Valuation of Natural Resources .. 297 IV. METHODS FOR MONETIZING DAMAGE TO NATURAL RESOURCES 297 -
From Wilderness to the Toxic Environment: Health in American Environmental Politics, 1945-Present
From Wilderness to the Toxic Environment: Health in American Environmental Politics, 1945-Present The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Thomson, Jennifer Christine. 2013. From Wilderness to the Toxic Environment: Health in American Environmental Politics, 1945- Present. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11125030 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA From Wilderness to the Toxic Environment: Health in American Environmental Politics, 1945-Present A dissertation presented by Jennifer Christine Thomson to The Department of the History of Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History of Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2013 @ 2013 Jennifer Christine Thomson All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Charles Rosenberg Jennifer Christine Thomson From Wilderness to the Toxic Environment: Health in American Environmental Politics, 1945-Present Abstract This dissertation joins the history of science and medicine with environmental history to explore the language of health in environmental politics. Today, in government policy briefs and mission statements of environmental non-profits, newspaper editorials and activist journals, claims about the health of the planet and its human and non-human inhabitants abound. Yet despite this rhetorical ubiquity, modern environmental politics are ideologically and organizationally fractured along the themes of whose health is at stake and how that health should be protected. -
2009-10 County Clerk Election Study Group Final
Analysis of Travis County’s Current Voting System and Recommendations for Future Systems 2009 Travis County Clerk Election Study Group Final Report 2009 Travis County Clerk Election Study Group Chaired by Dana DeBeauvoir, Travis County Clerk P.O. Box 149325, Austin, Texas 78714-9325 5501 Airport Blvd., Austin, TX 78751-1410 512-854-9188 or 512-854-4996 www.co.travis.tx.us 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 5 Executive Summary 7 Mission Statement 11 The Format of this Report 11 Introduction and Background 13 Election Study Group Membership 15 Rules of Conduct 19 A Brief History of Travis County Voting Issues 21 During the Last Twenty Years Summaries of the Meetings of the 2009 Election Study Group Meeting 1: Welcome and Overview of Election Administration 27 Meeting 2: An Up-Close Look at Travis County’s Current Voting System 31 Meeting 3: Group Discussion of Concerns with Travis County’s Current Voting System 33 Meeting 4: Understanding the Certification Process for Voting Systems 43 Meeting 5: Electronic Voting Systems (DREs) and Use of the Voter Verified Paper Trail (VVPAT) 47 Meeting 6: Optical Scan/Digital Scan Precinct Ballot Counter Voting Systems 53 Meeting 7: Conducting Hand Count Paper Ballot Elections 57 Meeting 8: Cost Comparison of Voting Systems with Review and Discussion 61 Meeting 9: Developing Recommendations for Presentation to Commissioners Court 71 Comments and Recommendations 73 Appendices Appendix A Outline of Study Group Mission, Background Issues and Process 79 Appendix B Voting Systems Comparisons 85 Appendix C Evaluating Security for Travis County Voting Systems by Brent Waters 125 Appendix D Texas House Committee on Elections, 2008 Interim Report, Pages 5-30 131 Minority Reports Appendix E #1:Submitted by Jim McNabb 161 Appendix F #2:Submitted by Karen Renick 167 3 4 Acknowledgements First, please permit me to say thank you to the voters of Travis County for allowing me the honor of conducting elections in this community for the last 24 years. -
General Election TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3 7Am – 8Pm
General Election TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3 7am – 8pm 2020 Nonpartisan Voter INDEX Congressional District Map .......... 2 General Information ...........3, 35-38 U.S. Senate ..................................4-5 Guide The League of Women Voters of Michigan would like to U.S. Representative thank the following organizations for their financial (Dist. 1-14) .................................6-23 support to enable production of this Voter Guide: State Board of Education ........24-25 University of Michigan ...........26-27 Contributors to the League of Women Voters® Michigan State University .......28-29 of Michigan Education Fund Wayne State University ...........30-31 Supreme Court ........................32-33 Court of Appeals ..........................33 Ballot Proposals ...........................34 Clip & Take to the Polls ...............40 Celebrating Updated Candidate Information - Plus 100 Years Michigan State Legislative Candidates, Local Races, Ballot Proposals of Women’s is available online at VOTE411.org. Suffrage Also see www.LWVMI.ORG for additional election information. for most women 2 H LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MICHIGAN 2020 NONPARTISAN VOTER GUIDE ® 1 4 2 5 10 3 8 6 7 11 9 14 Congressional 13 District Map 12 LEAGUE OF WOMEN VOTERS OF MICHIGAN 2020 NONPARTISAN VOTER GUIDE ® H 3 About This Guide Voting The League of Women Voters of Michigan contacted candidates for biographi- Voting in Michigan has never been easier. Voters have options. For more cal information and answers to questions on issues. The answers are printed as submitted and have not been edited, except for necessary cutting when replies information, see page 37. exceed the stated character limitations or violated content guidelines. Spelling and grammar were not corrected. If the candidate did not reply by the required Voting Early by Absentee Ballot date for publication, the words “Did not respond in time for inclusion” appear No excuse is needed. -
Campaign Finance Report State of Wisconsin
CAMPAIGN FINANCE REPORT STATE OF WISCONSIN Is this report an Amendment? No COMMITTEE IDENTIFICATION Name of Committee Friends of Patrick Miles Address 5410 North Pass OFFICE USE ONLY City, State, ZIP McFarland, WI 53558 GAB # ID NAME OF REPORT Jan 20__ Continuing Pre-Primary 20__ Spring Fall Special July 20__ Continuing Pre-election 2010 Spring Fall Special SUMMARY OF RECEIPTS AND DISBURSEMENTS Column A Column B Audited Totals 1. RECEIPTS This Period YTD Office Use Only A. Contributions including Loans from Individuals $ 5,444.88 $ 5,444.88 B. Contributions from Committees (Transfers-In) $ 700.00 $ 700.00 C. Other Income and Commercial Loans $ 2.00 $ 2.00 TOTAL RECEIPTS (Add totals from 1A, 1B, and 1C) $ 6,146.88 $ 6,146.88 1. DISBURSEMENTS A. Gross Expenditures $ 3,496.73 $ 3,496.73 B. Contributions to Committees (Transfers-Out) $ - $ - TOTAL DISBURSEMENTS (Add totals from 2A and 2B) $ 3,496.73 $ 3,496.73 CASH SUMMARY Cash Balance at Beginning of Report$ 2,564.47 $ 2,564.47 Total Receipts$ 6,146.88 $ 6,146.88 Subtotal$ 8,711.35 $ 8,711.35 Total Disbursements$ 3,496.73 $ 3,496.73 CASH BALANCE AT END OF REPORT $ 5,214.62 $ 5,214.62 INCURRED OBLIGATIONS (at close of period) $ 755.61 LOANS (at close of period) $ - I certify that I have examined this report and to the best of my knowledge and belief it is true, correct and complete. Type or Print Name of Candidate or Treasurer Signature of Candidate or Treasurer Date Daytime Phone NOTE: The information on this form is required by ss. -
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT of MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MATT ERARD, Case No. 2:12-Cv-13627 District Judge St
2:12-cv-13627-SJM-MKM Doc # 55 Filed 01/09/14 Pg 1 of 71 Pg ID <pageID> UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION MATT ERARD, Case No. 2:12-cv-13627 District Judge Stephen J. Murphy, III Plaintiff, Magistrate Judge Laurie J. Michelson v. MICHIGAN SECRETARY OF STATE RUTH JOHNSON, in her official capacity, Defendant. / REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS [46] Plaintiff Matt Erard wants to run for Congress as a nominee of the Socialist Party of Michigan and desires to vote for the Party’s other nominees for political office. The Socialist Party of Michigan, however, has not been able to qualify for placement on Michigan’s general-election ballot since 1976. In 2012, the Socialist Party made some efforts to satisfy the requirements of Michigan Compiled Laws § 168.685 and thereby petition Michigan’s Secretary of State, Defendant Ruth Johnson, to place the Party on the November 2012 general-election ballot. But the 925 signatures the Socialist Party of Michigan collected fell well short of the 32,261 required by § 168.685(1). Erard maintains that this was, in significant part, because § 168.685, when combined with other related ballot-access regulations, is too onerous. In fact, Erard believes that it so difficult for the Socialist Party of Michigan to petition its way onto Michigan’s general-election ballot that Michigan’s petitioning scheme impermissibly burdens his First and Fourteenth Amendment rights to associate for the advancement of his political beliefs and to cast his vote effectively. -
Political Parties: State Organizations and Current Party Platforms
Political 9 Parties Wisconsin political parties: state organizations and current party platforms Moon Crater (NASA) 864 WISCONSIN BLUE BOOK 2009 – 2010 POLITICAL PARTY ORGANIZATION IN WISCONSIN What Is a Political Party? A political party is a private, voluntary organization of people with similar political beliefs that vies with other parties for control of government. Political parties help voters select their government officials and create a consensus on the basic principles that direct governmental activities and processes. Political parties in the United States have traditionally provided an organized framework for the orderly performance of several basic political tasks necessary to representative democracy. Parties act to: • Provide a stable institution for building coalitions based on shared principles and priorities. • Recruit and nominate candidates for elective and appointive offices in government. • Promote the election of the party’s slate of candidates. • Guard the integrity of election procedures and vote canvassing. • Educate the voters by defining issues, taking policy positions, and formulating programs. U.S. parties offer a marked contrast to the party apparatus in other nations. In many parts of the world, political parties begin with defined ideologies and programs. Their members are recruited on the basis of these ideas, and there is not much room for disagreement within the ranks. In other cases, parties represent regional interests or ethnic groups. By contrast, parties in the United States are loosely organized groups reflecting a broad spectrum of interests. They are truly populist parties in the sense that they accommodate diversity and are instruments of party activists at the grass roots level. Political ideology, as stated in a party’s national platform, is formulated first at the local level and then refined through debate and compromise at meetings representing successively larger geographic areas. -
Greens Slam Hillary While Donations Spike August 11, 2015 St
Green Party of PA Hails Federal Court Ruling Concerning Pennsylvania’s Restrictive Ballot Access Laws Page 3 Partying for a Green Future Paul Glover Page 2 Green Party of PA Candidate Information Pennsylvania has some of the most egregious ballot access laws in the Country. Cited by the United Nations as the most “anti- democratic “state” on the planet. This included countries not in the US. The Senate State Government Committee will hold a public hearing on the Voter's Choice Act Senate Bill 495. If at all possible, please attend this hearing to demonstrate support for the Voter's Choice Act Tuesday, September 22, 9 AM; Hearing Room 1 of the North Office Building, Harrisburg OppositionNews.org By: Mark Wachtler Greens Slam Hillary while Donations Spike August 11, 2015 St. Louis, MO. (ONN) Green Party members may have noticed some excitement in the air. The Greens are firing on all cylinders after their national convention in St. Louis last month. Donations are up. The establishment media is giving the Party tons of free coverage. Five candidates have launched a campaign for the Redistributed with permission Party’s 2016 Presidential nomination. The Greens are suing the Commission on Presidential Debates. And five-dollar-Fridays are providing the resources to do it all. Cont. Page 5 Page 2 GPofPA. org Partying for a Green Future By: Paul Glover Author, Social Advocate & Green paulglover.org As the 2014 Green Party candidate for Pennsylvania governor I had a front row seat at the corruption of the ballot. Media ignored my candidacy and its detailed proposals for fixing Pennsylvania's chronic problems. -
Green Party of Michigan State Membership Meeting and Nominating Convention Traverse City * May 22-23, 2004
Green Party of Michigan State Membership Meeting and Nominating Convention Traverse City * May 22-23, 2004 Saturday, May 22 9:00 - 9:15am Welcome and introductions [9:33am] Lou N says good morning; hopes everyone enjoys the site and the area thanks to TBWG for hosting – esp Tom Mair, Tom Shea, John Porter; calls up Tom Shea for welcome Tom Shea also people from UpNorth Greens and Emmet Greens chose this location property owned by Ottawa & Chippewa bands – they supported Ralph & Winona in 2000 this party is about individuals, not individual corporations here to become candidates and elected officials; one step to that is to be appointed by an elected official or can run for a non-partisan office (like Jason Glover); N’westMC is supportive of his candidacy Lou N suggests a round of self-introductions (even though a larger group than normal) 9:15 - 10:00am Officers’ reports & discussions; SCC reports [9:40] Lou N as Meeting Manager – we’ve had our 4 qtly meetings, plan to continue to do so need a volunteer local to host the August meeting Randym (Clearinghouse Co-ordinator) has report in packet most calls are for cab company; 67 pieces of mail; discussions with Locals Liaison & Membership Secretary Pete S (Locals Liaison) report not in packet . copy places all closed (if you want a copy, ask after) named officers, 30 members on the SCC (so 20 is quorum) same locals as last time – a bit of a problem starting new locals; he’s sent some packets out, but no fruit borne yet some update on database project (he’s put in over 300 hours on it) wants to contact all the people in the database (400 of 1,400 he’s contacted are NG) breakdown of people going to GPUS convention as delegates or alternates (18 alternates) at one point, we were faced with no women alternates . -
The Case for Restoring and Updating the Voting Rights Act
The Case for Restoring and Updating the Voting Rights Act A Report of the American Civil Liberties Union 2019 Submitted for the Record in Support of the Voting Rights Advancement Act, H.R. 4, in the U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary November 8, 2019 For further information, please contact Sonia Gill, Senior Legislative Counsel, at [email protected]. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Sonia K. Gill, Senior Legislative Counsel, National Political Advocacy Department Dale Ho, Director, Voting Rights Project Adriel I. Cepeda Derieux, Staff Attorney, Voting Rights Project Kristen Lee, Policy Analyst, National Political Advocacy Department Marc Alexander Ault, Legal Intern, Voting Rights Project The authors thank the ACLU attorneys and staff who contributed to this report: Laughlin McDonald, Katherine Palm, Alora Thomas-Lundborg, Sophia Lin Lakin, Theresa J. Lee, Lila Carpenter, Amanda L. Scott, Juan Diaz, and Kelly M. Hernández. The ACLU extends special thanks to the law firm Sidley Austin, LLP, for the assistance provided in drafting this report, in particular Stacy Gulledge, Kelley Conaty, Joselle Albracht, Jacqueline Cooper, Angela Daniel, John Stribling, Daniel Driscoll, Sean Damm, Ellen Heighten, Jackson Long, Amy Steurer, Robert Charles Davidson, Brett Reamer, Natali Wyson, John Wisse, Whitney Price, Crystal Clark, Lindsay Guevara, Joelle Coachman, and Mark Herzog. TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction………………………………………………………………………………. 1 I. Historical overview ......................................................................................... 6 a. Reconstruction and post-Reconstruction b. Congressional efforts to address voting discrimination prior to 1965 c. The Voting Rights Act of 1965 d. Voting Rights Act amendments and reauthorizations: 1970-1982 e. The 2006 reauthorization II. Congressional authority to remedy racial discrimination in voting after Shelby County ................................................................................................. 20 a. -
Report of the Minority of the Accreditation Committee with Respect To
1 Report of the Minority of the Accreditation Committee With respect to the Committee’s referral of the Complaint of the National Lavender Green Caucus Seeking the Revocation of Accreditation for the Georgia Green Party The Accreditation Committee has adopted a majority report1 in the form of a proposal, being referred to the Green National Committee seeking a vote to revoke the accreditation of the Georgia Green Party for endorsing the Declaration on Women’s Sex-Based Rights. The Georgia delegation, being prevented by the recusal rule from participating in most respects with the Accreditation Committee process for considering the complaint filed by the National Lavender Caucus (referred to throughout this report as the Complaint); I offer this minority report as one member’s perspective. I offer this report to examine whether our committee performed due diligence in fulfilling its responsibilities to the Green Party of the United States, in the handling of the Complaint. To reach a determination on that question, I believe it is necessary that our committee: 1) determine the legitimacy of Georgia’s position, that is (whether one agrees with it or not), is it allowed, permissible, for a Green party to take this position?; 2) have an open dialogue on the issue; 3) resolve the complaint according to the evidence (which in my view would be to decide against disaccreditation of the Green Party of Georgia). With respect to the first goal, it has become clear to me that the positions the Georgia party has taken are legitimate from a Green point of view. Before I started reading further about this issue, I would have signed right on to the grievance, with “of course that’s right!” But no more.