DOCSLIB.ORG

Natural Resource Damage Valuation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Natural Resource Damage Valuation Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 42 Issue 2 Issue 2 - March 1989 Article 1 3-1989 Natural Resource Damage Valuation Frank B. Cross Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Environmental Law Commons Recommended Citation Frank B. Cross, Natural Resource Damage Valuation, 42 Vanderbilt Law Review 269 (1989) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol42/iss2/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW VOLUME 42 MARCH 1989 NUMBER 2 Natural Resource Damage Valuation Frank B. Cross* Some consume beauty for gain; but all of us must consume it to live.1 I. INTRODUCTION ........................................... 270 II. LEGAL AUTHORITY FOR GOVERNMENT RECOVERY OF NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGES ..................................... 273 A. Superfund ...................................... 273 B. The Clean Water Act and Other Federal Laws ..... 276 C. State Statutes and Common Law ................. 277 III. VALUES ATTRIBUTABLE TO NATURAL RESOURCES ........... 280 A . Use Value ...................................... 281 B. Existence Value ................................. 285 C. Intrinsic Value .................................. 292 D. Achieving a True Valuation of Natural Resources .. 297 IV. METHODS FOR MONETIZING DAMAGE TO NATURAL RESOURCES 297 A. Restoration and Replacement Cost ................ 298 B. M arket Valuation ............................... 302 C. Behavioral Use Valuation ........................ 309 D. Contingent Valuation ............................ 315 E. Estimating Gross and Net Value of Resources ..... 320 V. DEVELOPING A SYSTEM OF NATURAL RESOURCE VALUATION . 321 A. Department of the Interior Regulations-A First S tep ............................................ 321 * Associate Professor of Business Law, University of Texas; Associate Director, Center for Legal and Regulatory Studies; B.A., University of Kansas, 1977; J.D., Harvard University, 1980. 1. Yi-Fu Tuan, Our Treatment of the Environment in Ideal and Actuality, 58 AK ScL 244, 249 (1970). 269 VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW [Vol. 42:269 B. The Next Step-More Complete Valuation Proce- dures ........................................... 324 1. Use of Restoration Cost and the Primacy of Preservation ................................ 327 2. Cost Considerations and Alternatives to Restora- tion ........................................ 334 VI. CONCLUSION-PRIVATIZING THE ENVIRONMENT FOR ITS PRO- TECTION ............................................. 339 I. INTRODUCTION How much is beauty worth in dollars? Some people may recoil at the very phrasing of this question.2 Yet placing a monetary value on natural resources is not inherently destructive. Custom places a mone- tary value on artwork. Capitalism even values beautiful natural vistas in the form of land prices. Placing a monetary value on beauty and other features of nature may be essential if one is to protect natural resources fully. This Article explores the proper monetary valuation under Superfund and other legislation of natural objects,' including living ani- mals, aesthetic views, and water purity. The path to achieving valuation is rife with pitfalls, both philosophical and practical. Should the law focus on the monetary value to those people who "consume beauty for gain," as in the free market, or should government also consider beauty's existence and intrinsic value to the rest of society, which may "consume it to live." If the latter, then what dollar value possibly can be used? Placing an economic value on natural resources is not just an aca- demic exercise. Valuation of resources allows courts to assess damages for environmental harm, deters future pollution, and helps ensure pro- tection for natural ecosystems. When natural resources are publicly held for (almost) free use, citizens have an inexorable incentive to over- 2. See Higgs, Changing Value Perspectivesin Natural Resource Allocation: From Market to Ecosystem, 116 TRANSACTIONS AM. FISHERIES Soc'y 525, 527 (1987). To Higgs, an environmental ethicist, "to quantify values is to take away their essential power as edifying expressions of social preference." Higgs asks, "[h]ow could we measure the experiential value of Niagara Falls?" as an example of "certain types of social questions which cannot be fully considered by appeal to eco- nomic mechanisms." Id.; see also Kelnan, Cost-Benefit Analysis: An Ethical Critique, in REGULA- TION, Jan.-Feb. 1981, at 33-38. Kelman writes: Finally, one may oppose the effort to place prices on a non-market thing and hence in effect incorporate it into the market system out of a fear that the very act of doing so will reduce the thing's perceived value. To place a price on the benefit may, in other words, reduce the value of that benefit. Cost-benefit analysis thus may be like the thermometer that, when placed in a liquid to be measured, itself changes the liquid's temperature. 3. See infra notes 10-51 and accompanying text. 1989] NATURAL RESOURCE DAMAGE consume these resources. A person who pollutes natural resources may seize the economic benefit of the polluting activity, while avoiding any economic cost to himself from the harms caused by pollution. Econo- mists call this practice externalizing a cost. As a result, public natural resources are destroyed, even when contrary to the interest of society.4 One solution to this destructive situation forces those who harm the environment to bear the economic costs of this harm. Commonly de- scribed in economics as internalizing an external cost, this objective was one of the purposes of the Superfund legislation. According to the Sen- ate Report, the first purpose of Superfund was to assure "that those responsible for any damage, environmental harm, or injury from chemi- cal poisons bear the costs of their actions." 5 Natural resource valuation also may be critical to analyzing the costs and benefits of protecting the environment in government regulation.' Thus economics can form the foundation of environmental protec- tion. While some environmentalists regard environmental resource 4. See generally A. FREEMAN, R HAVEMAN & A. KNEESE, THE ECONOMICS OF ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY (1973); Ruff, The Economic Common Sense of Pollution, in MICROECONOMICS: SELECTED READINGS 498 (E. Mansfield ed. 1975); see infra notes 377-81 and accompanying text. 5. S.REP. No. 848, 96th Cong., 2d Sess. 13 (1980). Upon signing the bill into law, President Carter declared that "[miost important, it enables the Government to recover from responsible parties the costs of their actions in the disposal of toxic wastes." Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980: Remarks on Signing H.R. 7020 Into Law, 16 WEEKLY COMP. PREs. Doc. 2797, 2798 (Dec. 11, 1980). Court interpretations of Superfund concur, finding that "Congress intended that those responsible for problems caused by the disposal of chemical poisons bear the costs and responsibility for remedying the harmful conditions they cre- ated." United States v. Reilly Tar & Chem. Corp., 546 F. Supp. 1100, 1112 (D. Minn. 1982); see also Ohio ex. rel. Brown v. Georgeoff, 562 F. Supp. 1300, 1312 (N.D. Ohio 1983). To fulfill this intent, the harms created by hazardous wastes must be monetized as damages to be imposed upon those who create the harms. 6. While cost-benefit analysis has numerous critics, the system is increasingly employed in analyzing proposed environmental protection regulations. See, e.g., Andrews, Economics and Envi- ronmental Decisions, Past and Present, in ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY UNDER REAGAN'S EXECUTIVE ORDER. THE ROLE OF BENEFIT-CosT ANALYSIS 43 (K. Smith ed. 1984). See generally COMPTROLLER GENERAL, GENERAL ACCOUNTING OFFICE, REPORT TO THE CONGRESS: COsT-BENEFIT ANALYSIS CAN BE USEFUL IN ASSESSING ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATIONS, DESPITE LIMITATIONS (1984). The application of cost-benefit analysis has been limited, however, by shortcomings in the valuation of environ- mental benefits. See OFFICE OF POLICY PLANNING & EVALUATION, ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, EPA's USE OF BENEFIT-CosT ANALYSIS: 1981-1986, at 4-4 (Aug. 1987) (stating that in a majority of EPA cost-benefit analyses, the agency was unable to monetize the benefits of the regu- lation in question). As long as cost-benefit analyses fail to monetize fully environmental benefits, relatively intangible benefits may be overlooked or understated in the cost-benefit balancing. Cost- benefit analysis tends to ignore variables that are not monetized. Tribe, Seven Deadly Sins of Straining the Constitution through a Pseudo-Scientific Sieve, 36 HASTINGS L.J. 155, 161 (1984); see also J. CAMPEN, BENEFIT, COST, AND BEYOND 63-64 (1986). The answer to this skewing in cost- benefit analysis is not to abolish the analysis, but to incorporate better environmental and other relatively intangible benefits. Id. at 99-102. Complete and accurate valuation of natural resources would contribute to the improvement of cost-benefit analysis and the better protection of environ- mental concerns. 272 VANDERBILT LAW REVIEW [Vol. 42:269 monetization as a Faustian bargain,7 use of these economic principles can provide an essential weapon for future protection of the environ- ment.8 Internalizing external environmental costs through the market can deter future ecological destruction,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lesson Plan with Activities: Political
    LESSON PLAN POLITICAL PARTIES Recommended for Grade 10 Duration: Approximately 60 minutes BACKGROUND INFORMATION Parliamentary Roles: www.ola.org/en/visit-learn/about-ontarios-parliament/ parliamentary-roles LEARNING GOALS This lesson plan is designed to engage students in the political process through participatory activities and a discussion about the various political parties. Students will learn the differences between the major parties of Ontario and how they connect with voters, and gain an understanding of the important elements of partisan politics. INTRODUCTORY DISCUSSION (10 minutes) Canada is a constitutional monarchy and a parliamentary democracy, founded on the rule of law and respect for rights and freedoms. Ask students which country our system of government is based on. Canada’s parliamentary system stems from the British, or “Westminster,” tradition. Since Canada is a federal state, responsibility for lawmaking is shared among one federal, ten provincial and three territorial governments. Canada shares the same parliamentary system and similar roles as other parliaments in the Commonwealth – countries with historic links to Britain. In our parliament, the Chamber is where our laws are debated and created. There are some important figures who help with this process. Some are partisan and some are non-partisan. What does it mean to be partisan/non-partisan? Who would be voicing their opinions in the Chamber? A helpful analogy is to imagine the Chamber as a game of hockey, where the political parties are the teams playing and the non-partisan roles as the people who make sure the game can happen (ex. referees, announcers, score keepers, etc.) LEGISLATIVE ASSEMBLY OF ONTARIO POLITICAL PARTIES 01 EXPLANATION (5 minutes) Political Parties: • A political party is a group of people who share the same political beliefs.
    [Show full text]
  • G Reen Pa G Es
    Save Our Democracy: Support the Green Party! The Green Party is unique because we reject corporate money. We believe that our values — your values — of peace, GREEN PAGES ecological wisdom, democracy and social justice should be The Newspaper of the Green Party of the United States guiding public policy. We are fully funded by real people (not corporations) like you. The Green Party’s success also serves the larger cause Vol. 19, No. 2 • Fall 2017 of multi-party democracy and independent politics in s e t the United States. I strongly believe in citizen lobbying a t and activism, but it must be coupled with electoral S d strategies and strong candidates. Com pared to other e Utah Greens t i organizations, the Green Party is relatively small, and n U so I know that every dollar I contribute has an enor - e S h t mous impact. I always give to the Green Party first and then to other wor - f E o Reboot, Make thy causes. — John Andrews y t r G 3 a 1 I can’t sit by and see wrongs and not do P 0 A n anything. I couldn’t justify having a kid if I e 0 e 2 P r wasn’t going to try and fix the world. When Ballot G C I’m around my Green friends, I feel like e 5 D h N 7 t there’s hope. Green values encompass n f 0 o o 5 E everything that’s important, and give us t n See story page 4 7 g o i an avenue to fix the problems in our soci - x E n t i a o h ety.
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Select Committee on Electoral Reform
    Legislative Assemblée Assembly législative of Ontario de l'Ontario SELECT COMMITTEE ON ELECTORAL REFORM REPORT ON ELECTORAL REFORM 2nd Session, 38th Parliament 54 Elizabeth II Library and Archives Canada Cataloguing in Publication Data Ontario. Legislative Assembly. Select Committee on Electoral Reform Report on electoral reform [electronic resource] Issued also in French under title: Rapport de la réforme électorale. Electronic monograph in PDF format. Mode of access: World Wide Web. ISBN 0-7794-9375-3 1. Ontario. Legislative Assembly—Elections. 2. Elections—Ontario. 3. Voting—Ontario. I. Title. JL278 O56 2005 324.6’3’09713 C2005-964015-4 Legislative Assemblée Assembly législative of Ontario de l'Ontario The Honourable Mike Brown, M.P.P., Speaker of the Legislative Assembly. Sir, Your Select Committee on Electoral Reform has the honour to present its Report and commends it to the House. Caroline Di Cocco, M.P.P., Chair. Queen's Park November 2005 SELECT COMMITTEE ON ELECTORAL REFORM COMITÉ SPÉCIAL DE LA RÉFORME ÉLECTORALE Room 1405, Whitney Block, Toronto, Ontario M7A 1A2 SELECT COMMITTEE ON ELECTORAL REFORM MEMBERSHIP LIST CAROLINE DI COCCO Chair NORM MILLER Vice-Chair WAYNE ARTHURS KULDIP S. KULAR RICHARD PATTEN MICHAEL D. PRUE MONIQUE M. SMITH NORMAN STERLING KATHLEEN O. WYNNE Anne Stokes Clerk of the Committee Larry Johnston Research Officer i CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 Electoral Systems 1 Citizens’ Assembly Terms of Reference 2 Composition of the Assembly 2 Referendum Issues 4 Review of Electoral Reform 5 Future Role 5 List of Recommendations 6 INTRODUCTION 9 Mandate 9 Research Methodology 10 Assessment Criteria 10 Future Role 11 Acknowledgements 11 I.
    [Show full text]
  • From Wilderness to the Toxic Environment: Health in American Environmental Politics, 1945-Present
    From Wilderness to the Toxic Environment: Health in American Environmental Politics, 1945-Present The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Thomson, Jennifer Christine. 2013. From Wilderness to the Toxic Environment: Health in American Environmental Politics, 1945- Present. Doctoral dissertation, Harvard University. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:11125030 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA From Wilderness to the Toxic Environment: Health in American Environmental Politics, 1945-Present A dissertation presented by Jennifer Christine Thomson to The Department of the History of Science In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the subject of History of Science Harvard University Cambridge, Massachusetts May 2013 @ 2013 Jennifer Christine Thomson All rights reserved. Dissertation Advisor: Charles Rosenberg Jennifer Christine Thomson From Wilderness to the Toxic Environment: Health in American Environmental Politics, 1945-Present Abstract This dissertation joins the history of science and medicine with environmental history to explore the language of health in environmental politics. Today, in government policy briefs and mission statements of environmental non-profits, newspaper editorials and activist journals, claims about the health of the planet and its human and non-human inhabitants abound. Yet despite this rhetorical ubiquity, modern environmental politics are ideologically and organizationally fractured along the themes of whose health is at stake and how that health should be protected.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009-10 County Clerk Election Study Group Final
    Analysis of Travis County’s Current Voting System and Recommendations for Future Systems 2009 Travis County Clerk Election Study Group Final Report 2009 Travis County Clerk Election Study Group Chaired by Dana DeBeauvoir, Travis County Clerk P.O. Box 149325, Austin, Texas 78714-9325 5501 Airport Blvd., Austin, TX 78751-1410 512-854-9188 or 512-854-4996 www.co.travis.tx.us 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements 5 Executive Summary 7 Mission Statement 11 The Format of this Report 11 Introduction and Background 13 Election Study Group Membership 15 Rules of Conduct 19 A Brief History of Travis County Voting Issues 21 During the Last Twenty Years Summaries of the Meetings of the 2009 Election Study Group Meeting 1: Welcome and Overview of Election Administration 27 Meeting 2: An Up-Close Look at Travis County’s Current Voting System 31 Meeting 3: Group Discussion of Concerns with Travis County’s Current Voting System 33 Meeting 4: Understanding the Certification Process for Voting Systems 43 Meeting 5: Electronic Voting Systems (DREs) and Use of the Voter Verified Paper Trail (VVPAT) 47 Meeting 6: Optical Scan/Digital Scan Precinct Ballot Counter Voting Systems 53 Meeting 7: Conducting Hand Count Paper Ballot Elections 57 Meeting 8: Cost Comparison of Voting Systems with Review and Discussion 61 Meeting 9: Developing Recommendations for Presentation to Commissioners Court 71 Comments and Recommendations 73 Appendices Appendix A Outline of Study Group Mission, Background Issues and Process 79 Appendix B Voting Systems Comparisons 85 Appendix C Evaluating Security for Travis County Voting Systems by Brent Waters 125 Appendix D Texas House Committee on Elections, 2008 Interim Report, Pages 5-30 131 Minority Reports Appendix E #1:Submitted by Jim McNabb 161 Appendix F #2:Submitted by Karen Renick 167 3 4 Acknowledgements First, please permit me to say thank you to the voters of Travis County for allowing me the honor of conducting elections in this community for the last 24 years.
    [Show full text]
  • Download This PDF File
    Canadian Political Science Review Vol. 14, No. 1, 2020, 118-146 ISBN (online) 1911-4125 Journal homepage: https://ojs.unbc.ca/index.php/cpsr Report Conservative Populism or Unpopular Liberalism? Review of the 2018 Ontario Provincial Election Andrea M.L. Perrella Wilfrid Laurier University – Email address: [email protected] Simon J. Kiss Wilfrid Laurier University – Email address: [email protected] Barry J. Kay We are sad to note that Dr. Barry Kay passed away in December of 2019. He contributed to this review and had over the years provided much sought-after insight into election campaign dynamics. Abstract Ontario’s general election on June 7, 2018, brought the Progressive Conservative party to government for the first time in the 21st Century. The PCs’ victory over the incumbent Liberals, however, reached this point despite much turmoil. Months before the election the party faced a crisis when its leader, Patrick Brown, resigned amid a scandal. The PC party hastily organized a leadership election that put Doug Ford at the helm, who then led the party to victory. The following election review traces these steps and looks at some dynamics that contributed to both the PC leadership vote and the overall result of the election. The PC leadership election is analyzed, providing evidence that Ford’s rise may reflect some of the populist sentiment that has gripped other democracies. The analysis then turns to the general election, focusing on media coverage and issue salience, particularly as they relate to the party leaders. Survey data are examined to build some explanatory vote-choice models, which shows that voters in the general election appeared less moved by populism than a desire to punish the Liberals.
    [Show full text]
  • August 16, 2017 From: Mike Schreiner (Leader, Green Party of Ontario) To
    August 16, 2017 From: Mike Schreiner (Leader, Green Party of Ontario) To: Nicole Frigault, Environmental Assessment Specialist Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission By email: [email protected] Canadian Nuclear Laboratories Proposed Near Surface Disposal Facility - Public Commenting Process CEAA Reference number: 80122 Dear Nicole Frigault: I’m deeply concerned with the proposed Near Surface Disposal Facility (NSDF) at the Canadian Nuclear Laboratories Site in Deep River, Ontario (CEAR Reference # 80122). Citizens, businesses and community groups are concerned that the proposed site is being fast-tracked for approval despite the fact that it does not meet safety standards established by the International Atomic Energy Agency. A number of retired scientists from Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL) are critical of the plan. Concerns with the plan include an unsuitable location next to wetlands that drain into the Ottawa River and the use of inadequate technology. In addition, the proposal does not meet regulatory requirements with respect to the health and safety of people and the protection of the environment. Some experts have raised concerns that the NSDF proposal fails to fulfill all requirements set out in the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act for public consultation and assessment of alternatives. This plan threatens the quality of drinking water for millions of people who live downstream. Government has a responsibility to ensure that people’s health and drinking water are protected. Given the many concerns regarding the NSDF, I urge the CNSC to deny the proposal at this time. I urge you send this proposal back to the drawing board so that our health, water and environment are protected for present and future generations.
    [Show full text]
  • The Position of Ontario's Political Parties on Métis Issues
    The position of Ontario’s political parties on Métis issues: The Métis Nation of Ontario (MNO) wrote the leaders of each of Ontario’s four principal political parties and provided each with 15 questions pertaining to Métis issues in order to provide MNO citizens with more information prior to the provincial election. To date, the Liberal, New Democratic and Green Parties have provided responses and we are waiting for responses from the Progressive Conservative Party. The chart that follows shows the questions asked and provides the response from each party to date. If further responses or clarifications are provided prior to the election the chart will be updated accordingly. Please note that the New Democratic response did not correlate directly to the questions but rather came in the form of a letter. As a result, the MNO had to match the relevant sections of the letter with the questions that were posed. Very minor editing was done to a few questions to adjust them to this format but nothing that in anyway changed the intent or meaning of the responses. Will your party commit to working directly with the Métis Nation of Ontario (MNO) and its governing 1. institutions on a government-to-government basis on issues that directly impact Ontario Métis? The Ontario Liberals are committed The MNO will be a partner No response to date. The Green Party of Ontario honours to strengthening relationships and to an NDP government in all indigenous rights in this province. working with Métis communities matters pertaining to Métis The GPO supports the right of in Ontario, building on a strong people in Ontario.
    [Show full text]
  • Mike Toomey Mobilizes
    Perry’s Roomie Mike Toomey Mobilizes The Corporate Lobby to ‘Make Us Great Again’ State Library & Archives Commission. Then-State Reps. Mike Toomey & Rick Perry. Contents: Rep. Toomey 2 Revolving Door 3 Birth of a Dream Client 4 2002 Elections 6 Payback Time 8 Let’s Make a Deal 12 Dark Arts 13 Notes 16 Texans for Public Justice — January 2012 — www.tpj.org Perry’s Roomey Mike Toomey Mobilizes The Corporate Lobby to ‘Make Us Great Again’ After Texas’ pivotal 2002 elections the state’s three top politicians all hired lobbyists to run the government. “Republican leaders boldly began delivering on their promise to increase efficiency and cut waste just one week after they won control of every branch of Texas government,” observed the Texas Observer. “Rather than having corporations pay lobbyists millions of dollars to influence government, the state’s new leaders recruited some of Texas’ most powerful lobbyists to run the government directly.”1 The most feared and respected lobbyist then seizing power was gubernatorial Chief of Staff Valens “Mike” Toomey, who founded Perry’s “independent” Super PAC Make Us Great Again. At that time in late 2002 Toomey was at the top of his game. Twenty years earlier Houston-area voters had elected this attorney to one of just 36 Republican seats in the 150-member Texas House. Now a new Republican House majority was preparing to elect Texas’ first GOP House Speaker since reconstruction, thereby helping Congressman Tom DeLay redraw Texas’ congressional districts. Toomey, meanwhile, would head the staff of his friend Rick Perry, who would govern the state longer than any previous Texas governor.
    [Show full text]
  • State Steering in Polycentric Governance Systems: Climate Policy Integration in Ontario and California’S Transportation Sectors
    State Steering in Polycentric Governance Systems: Climate Policy Integration in Ontario and California’s Transportation Sectors Colleen Kaiser A Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Faculty of Environmental Studies, York University, Toronto, Ontario March 2020 © Colleen Kaiser 2020 Abstract The post-Kyoto era of climate governance has witnessed a dramatic increase in the number and diversity of actors and organizations, resulting in a complex institutional regime that displays the essential features of polycentric governance (Keohane and Victor 2011; Abbott 2012; 2018). The complexity of polycentric climate governance systems makes them hard to describe and compare. That being said, they are also everywhere (Harford 2013). As our current reality, polycentric climate governance systems require research attention even though their ‘messy’ nature presents unique research challenges. This research furthers work by Elinor Ostrom and others on operationalizing polycentric climate governance, given the complexity and ‘institutional void’ associated with polycentric governance systems. In particular, this research argues that the state is a unique actor within polycentric climate governance systems, and serves a critical and exclusive function in crafting and enforcing overarching rules within which all other actors operate. A key focus in this research is climate policy integration and its drivers that are comparatively analyzed for the climate-transport governance regimes of the two case studies underpinning this research: Ontario, Canada and California, U.S.A. Additionally, the research introduces a novel approach for evaluating the degree of polycentricity in each case’s climate governance system. Finally, the research evaluates the degree to which overarching rules enhance these systems in relation to varying contexts.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to Green Publications
    Guide to Green Publications This is a selected “primer” of information prepared by the Green Web for people who want to start looking into the green movement. It was originally prepared in January 1990 and is now being reissued in a revised form, in February 1991, to reflect changes in the green movement as seen in publications. It reflects our sense of what is important, but we would like to emphasize that it is selective and that there are other sources of information. Publications (books and magazines) which we consider crucial are indicated as “recommended”. Recommended Books Christopher Manes, Green Rage: Radical Environmentalism and the Unmaking of Civilization,1990. A good and sympathetic history of the Earth First! movement, which the author has been a participant in. Major weakness of this book is when it tries to be analytical and place environmentalism in a larger context. This book does not have an anti-capitalist perspective and is very “American”. Brian Tokar, The Green Alternative: Creating an Ecological Future, 1987, paperback. A good book to read for a feel of what the green movement in the United States is all about. Gives the positive and negative sides of various questions that greens face. Social ecology perspective with basic assumptions, such as: local organizing to bring about national change; non-violence; and anarchism. The projected green models seem curiously speculative and contrast with the factual descriptions of the degradation of the ecosphere. Aldo Leopold, A Sand County Almanac, first published in 1949, paperback. This is a fundamental book for the green movement from the former American forester and wilderness philosopher.
    [Show full text]
  • Green Visions and Democratic Constraints the Possibility and Design of Democratic Institutions for Environmental Decision-Making
    Green Visions and Democratic Constraints The Possibility and Design of Democratic Institutions for Environmental Decision-making James Ka-lei Wong 11 March 2013 (Revised Edition) A thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Government at the London School of Economics and Political Science 1 DECLARATION I certify that the thesis I have presented for examination for the PhD degree of the London School of Economics and Political Science is solely my own work other than where I have clearly indicated that it is the work of others. The copyright of this thesis rests with the author. Quotation from it is permitted, provided that full acknowledgement is made. This thesis may not be reproduced without the prior written consent of the author. I warrant that this authorisation does not, to the best of my belief, infringe the rights of any third party. I declare that my thesis consists of 86,540 words. I can confirm that my thesis was copy edited for conventions of language, spelling and grammar by Jean Morris and Chris Steele. James Ka-lei Wong 2 ABSTRACT This thesis addresses a recurrent question of our time – whether democracy can secure environmental sustainability – by drawing on literatures in the normative theory of democracy, social choice theory and environmental politics. I propose a basic, yet substantial organising principle, the ‘dilemma of green democracy’, which maps out the possibility of realising green outcomes under democratic constraints. Interdisciplinary ideas from neighbouring disciplines are also imported for the purpose of studying the design of good environmental-democratic institutions. The analytical framework is an integrated one, comprising formal choice theory and normative democratic theory.
    [Show full text]