DOCSLIB.ORG

Topological Phases, Entanglement and Boson Condensation

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Topological Phases, Entanglement and Boson Condensation Topological Phases, Entanglement and Boson Condensation Huan He A Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of Princeton University in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy Recommended for Acceptance by the Department of Physics Adviser: Bogdan Andrei Bernevig June 2019 c Copyright by Huan He, 2019. All rights reserved. Abstract This dissertation investigates the boson condensation of topological phases and the entanglement entropies of exactly solvable models. First, the bosons in a \parent" (2+1)D topological phase can be condensed to obtain a \child" topological phase. We prove that the boson condensation formalism necessarily has a pair of modular matrix conditions: the modular matrices of the parent and the child topological phases are connected by an integer matrix. These two modular matrix conditions serve as a numerical tool to search for all possible boson condensation transitions from the parent topological phase, and predict the child topological phases. As applications of the modular matrix conditions, (1) we recover the Kitaev's 16-fold way, which classifies 16 different chiral superconductors in (2+1)D; (2) we prove that in any layers of topological theories SO(3)k with odd k, there do not exist condensable bosons. Second, an Abelian boson is always condensable. The condensation formalism in this scenario can be easily implemented by introducing higher form gauge symmetry. As an application in (2+1)D, the higher form gauge symmetry formalism recovers the same results of previous studies: bosons and only bosons can be condensed in an Abelian topological phase, and the deconfined particles braid trivially with the condensed bosons while the confined ones braid nontrivially. We emphasize again that the there exist non-Abelian bosons that cannot be condensed. Third, the ground states of stabilizer codes can be written as tensor network states. The entanglement entropy of such tensor network states can be calculated exactly. The 3D fracton models, as exotic stabilizer codes, are known to have several features which exceed the 3D topological phases: (i) the ground state degeneracy generally increase with the system size; (ii) the gapped excitations are immobile or only mobile in certain sub-manifolds. In our work, we calculate, for the first time, the entanglement entropy for the fracton models, and show that the entanglement iii entropy has a topological term linear to the subregions' sizes, whereas the topological phases only have constant topological entanglement entropies. iv Acknowledgements First and foremost, I would like to thank my advisor Prof. B. Andrei Bernevig for guidance and support. I have benefited enormously from his curiosity, dedication to physics and perseverance. He provides me with a complete freedom to work on the problems and topics that I am interested in, and more importantly, he never allows me to give up easily until we all find a satisfying answer. It is fair to say that rigorous and solid research is the trademark of our group, which I now completely agree is truly valuable. I will bear this spirit in mind for the rest of my career. During the journey, I am indebted to the help from many professors and friends who make me a better physicist. Among all of them, I owe the most to Prof Nicolas Regnault, Prof German Sierra and Yunqin Zheng. Many papers were not possible without their help and efforts. In fact, Nicolas and German are the two aspects of modern physicists. Nicolas's numerical technologies are unbelievable. I still remember how I was amazed when he finished a new program and computation before I finished speaking my speculations. It turned out that I was wrong and he was correct. I am lucky to meet and learn from German. Every time I discussed with German, I would enjoy the aesthetic of his physics and formulas, which I have almost forgotten over the years of research. His formulas reminded me of my initial motivation of becoming a physicist: the simple and beautiful laws of nature. Yunqin has been my major collaborator since the end of my first year in Princeton. In fact, we have known each other since undergraduate (10 years ago from now). I would never forget all the time we spent together with chalks on blackboards, pens on papers, and Mathematica on screens. The PCTS program and our department certainly bring in brilliant and optimistic young physicists globally. I am grateful for the collaborations with the postdoctoral researchers in Princeton: Prof Curt von Keyserlingk, Prof Titus Neupert, Prof Barry Bradlyn, Prof Jennifer Cano, Prof Yi Li, Dr Abhinav Prem, Dr Lian Biao, Dr Yizhi v You and Dr Kiryl Pakrouski. I hope that they also enjoy discussing and working with me. It was joyful and also surprisingly efficient to work with Prof Jia-Wei Mei and Dr. Ji-Yao Chen. A powerful tensor network MATLAB program was delivered in only a few weeks over the summer. I need to thank Xue-Da Wen, Apoorv Tiwari, Peng Ye for analytically calculating entanglement entropies, and being reliable and helpful collaborators for this project. Particularly, Xue-Da is the person who I would like to discuss all the time because of his enthusiastic passion. It would be my fault if I did not mention my group members, who I have in- teractions with, for many enlightening and refreshing conversations and discussions: Yang-Le Wu, Aris Alexandradinata, Sanjay Moudgalya, Zhi-Jun Wang, Jian Li, Zhi- Da Song, Fang Xie. I also would like to thank the physicists that I met during confer- ences, visit, emails and Skype: Rui-Xing Zhang, Chen Fang, Hong Yao, Yuan-Ming Lu, Meng Cheng, Yang Qi, Yuan Wan, Xie Chen, Giuseppe Carleo, Alan Morningstar, Yi-Chen Huang, Juven Wang, Yidun Wan, Heidar Moradi, Wen Wei Ho, Tian Lan and many others. My life would be miserable if without my friends in Princeton: Jing-Yu Luo, Jie Wang, Zheng Ma, Jing-Jing Lin, Yu Shen, Wu-Di Wang, Zhen-Bin Yang, Jun Xiong, Liang-Sheng Zhang, Bin Xu, Zhao-Qi Leng, Tong Gao, Suerfu, Yin-Yu Liu, Jia-Qi Jiang, Si-Hang Liang, Xin-Ran Li, Xiao-Wen Chen, Bo Zhao, Jun-Yi Zhang, Xue Song, Xin-Wei Yu, Hao Zheng, Zi-Ming Ji, Ho Tat Lam, Wen-Li Zhao, Po-Shen Hsin, Xiao-Jie Shi, Chaney Lin and many many others. I appreciate Prof Duncan Haldane, Prof Waseem Bakr and Prof Silviu Pufu for be- ing my committee members, and Prof Robert Austin for leading me the experimental project. vi Last but not the least, I appreciate the support from my parents during all these years. And most importantly, it is beyond my language to describe my gratitude for many years' accompany with my love, Yina. This dissertation is dedicated to you. vii To my love Yina viii Contents Abstract..................................... iii Acknowledgements...............................v List of Tables.................................. xiii List of Figures.................................. xiv 1 Preliminaries1 1.1 Stabilizer Codes..............................2 1.2 Entanglement Entropy and Tensor Network States...........4 1.3 Abelian Topological Field Theory....................7 1.4 Modular Tensor Category........................9 2 An Example: Toric Code Model 14 2.1 Stabilizer Code.............................. 14 2.2 Tensor Network State........................... 16 2.3 Modular Tensor Category........................ 18 2.4 BF Field Theory............................. 20 3 Boson Condensation 23 3.1 Definitions and Assumptions....................... 26 3.2 The Condensation Matrix Mab ...................... 29 3.2.1 Proof that M commutes with T matrix of the A theory.... 31 3.2.2 Proof that M commutes with S matrix of the A theory.... 31 ix 3.3 The Modular Tensor Category after condensation........... 33 3.4 Simple currents.............................. 36 3.4.1 Introduction to simple currents................. 36 3.4.2 Simple current condensation................... 38 3.5 One confined particle theories...................... 43 3.6 Formalism and implementation..................... 44 3.6.1 Solutions for M .......................... 45 3.6.2 Solutions for n .......................... 48 3.6.3 The modular matrices of the new theory............ 51 3.7 Layer constructions and uncondensable bosons............. 54 3.7.1 Theories with Zm-graded condensations............. 55 3.7.2 Theories with Z-fold way: Fibonacci TQFT.......... 60 3.8 Conclusions................................ 63 4 No-Go Theorem for Boson Condensation in Topologically Ordered Quantum Liquids 65 4.1 First No-Go Theorem........................... 66 4.2 Example (i): Multiple layers of Fibonacci................ 69 4.3 Example (ii): Single layer of SO(3)k ................... 71 4.4 Example (iii): Multiple layers of SO(3)k ................ 74 4.5 Summary................................. 74 5 Abelian Boson Condensation in Field Theory 76 5.1 Abelian Boson Condensation Formalism................ 77 5.2 Condensations in K-Matrix Chern-Simons Theories.......... 81 5.2.1 Condensable Condition...................... 82 5.2.2 Confinement/Deconfinement................... 84 x 6 Fracton Models, Tensor Network States and Their Entanglement Entropies 87 6.1 Stabilizer Code Tensor Network States................. 91 6.1.1 Notations............................. 91 6.1.2 Stabilizer Code and TNS Construction............. 94 6.1.3 TNS Norm............................ 98 6.1.4 Transfer Matrix.......................... 100 6.2 Entanglement properties of the stabilizer code TNS.......... 102 6.2.1 TNS as an exact SVD...................... 102 6.2.2 Summary of the results...................... 107 6.3 3D Toric Code............................... 109 6.3.1 Hamiltonian of 3D Toric Code Model.............. 109 6.3.2 TNS for 3D Toric Code...................... 111 6.3.3 Concatenation Lemma...................... 115 6.3.4 Entanglement........................... 117 6.3.5 Transfer Matrix as a Projector.................. 121 6.3.6 GSD and Transfer Matrix.................... 124 6.4 X-cube Model............................... 128 6.4.1 Hamiltonian of X-cube Model.................. 129 6.4.2 TNS for X-cube Model...................... 131 6.4.3 Concatenation Lemma...................... 134 6.4.4 Entanglement........................... 136 6.4.5 Transfer Matrix as a Projector.................. 141 6.4.6 GSD and Transfer Matrix...................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 3-Fermion Topological Quantum Computation [1]
    3-Fermion topological quantum computation [1] Sam Roberts1 and Dominic J. Williamson2 1Centre for Engineered Quantum Systems, School of Physics, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia 2Stanford Institute for Theoretical Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA I. INTRODUCTION Topological quantum computation (TQC) is currently the most promising approach to scalable, fault-tolerant quantum computation. In recent years, the focus has been on TQC with Kitaev's toric code [2], due to it's high threshold to noise [3, 4], and amenability to planar architectures with nearest neighbour interactions. To encode and manipulate quantum information in the toric code, a variety of techniques drawn from condensed matter contexts have been utilised. In particular, some of the efficient approaches for TQC with the toric code rely on creating and manipulating gapped-boundaries, symmetry defects and anyons of the underlying topological phase of matter [5{ 10]. Despite great advances, the overheads for universal fault-tolerant quantum computation remain a formidable challenge. It is therefore important to analyse the potential of TQC in a broad range of topological phases of matter, and attempt to find new computational substrates that require fewer quantum resources to execute fault-tolerant quantum computation. In this work we present an approach to TQC for more general anyon theories based on the Walker{Wang mod- els [11]. This provides a rich class of spin-lattice models in three-dimensions whose boundaries can naturally be used to topologically encode quantum information. The two-dimensional boundary phases of Walker{Wang models accommodate a richer set of possibilities than stand-alone two-dimensional topological phases realized by commuting projector codes [12, 13].
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1705.01740V1 [Cond-Mat.Str-El] 4 May 2017 2
    Physics of the Kitaev model: fractionalization, dynamical correlations, and material connections M. Hermanns1, I. Kimchi2, J. Knolle3 1Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany 2Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, 02139, USA and 3T.C.M. group, Cavendish Laboratory, J. J. Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0HE, United Kingdom Quantum spin liquids have fascinated condensed matter physicists for decades because of their unusual properties such as spin fractionalization and long-range entanglement. Unlike conventional symmetry breaking the topological order underlying quantum spin liquids is hard to detect exper- imentally. Even theoretical models are scarce for which the ground state is established to be a quantum spin liquid. The Kitaev honeycomb model and its generalizations to other tri-coordinated lattices are chief counterexamples | they are exactly solvable, harbor a variety of quantum spin liquid phases, and are also relevant for certain transition metal compounds including the polymorphs of (Na,Li)2IrO3 Iridates and RuCl3. In this review, we give an overview of the rich physics of the Kitaev model, including 2D and 3D fractionalization as well as dynamical correlations and behavior at finite temperatures. We discuss the different materials, and argue how the Kitaev model physics can be relevant even though most materials show magnetic ordering at low temperatures. arXiv:1705.01740v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 4 May 2017 2 CONTENTS I. Introduction 2 II. Kitaev quantum spin liquids 3 A. The Kitaev model 3 B. Classifying Kitaev quantum spin liquids by projective symmetries 4 C. Confinement and finite temperature 5 III. Symmetry and chemistry of the Kitaev exchange 6 IV.
    [Show full text]
  • Kitaev Materials
    Kitaev Materials Simon Trebst Institute for Theoretical Physics University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany Contents 1 Spin-orbit entangled Mott insulators 2 1.1 Bond-directional interactions . 4 1.2 Kitaev model . 6 2 Honeycomb Kitaev materials 9 2.1 Na2IrO3 ...................................... 9 2.2 ↵-Li2IrO3 ..................................... 10 2.3 ↵-RuCl3 ...................................... 11 3 Triangular Kitaev materials 15 3.1 Ba3IrxTi3 xO9 ................................... 15 − 3.2 Other materials . 17 4 Three-dimensional Kitaev materials 17 4.1 Conceptual overview . 18 4.2 β-Li2IrO3 and γ-Li2IrO3 ............................. 22 4.3 Other materials . 23 5 Outlook 24 arXiv:1701.07056v1 [cond-mat.str-el] 24 Jan 2017 Lecture Notes of the 48th IFF Spring School “Topological Matter – Topological Insulators, Skyrmions and Majoranas” (Forschungszentrum Julich,¨ 2017). All rights reserved. 2 Simon Trebst 1 Spin-orbit entangled Mott insulators Transition-metal oxides with partially filled 4d and 5d shells exhibit an intricate interplay of electronic, spin, and orbital degrees of freedom arising from a largely accidental balance of electronic correlations, spin-orbit entanglement, and crystal-field effects [1]. With different ma- terials exhibiting slight tilts towards one of the three effects, a remarkably broad variety of novel forms of quantum matter can be explored. On the theoretical side, topology is found to play a crucial role in these systems – an observation which, in the weakly correlated regime, has lead to the discovery of the topological band insulator [2, 3] and subsequently its metallic cousin, the Weyl semi-metal [4, 5]. Upon increasing electronic correlations, Mott insulators with unusual local moments such as spin-orbit entangled degrees of freedom can form and whose collective behavior gives rise to unconventional types of magnetism including the formation of quadrupo- lar correlations or the emergence of so-called spin liquid states.
    [Show full text]
  • Some Comments on Physical Mathematics
    Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION Some Comments on Physical Mathematics Gregory W. Moore Abstract: These are some thoughts that accompany a talk delivered at the APS Savannah meeting, April 5, 2014. I have serious doubts about whether I deserve to be awarded the 2014 Heineman Prize. Nevertheless, I thank the APS and the selection committee for their recognition of the work I have been involved in, as well as the Heineman Foundation for its continued support of Mathematical Physics. Above all, I thank my many excellent collaborators and teachers for making possible my participation in some very rewarding scientific research. 1 I have been asked to give a talk in this prize session, and so I will use the occasion to say a few words about Mathematical Physics, and its relation to the sub-discipline of Physical Mathematics. I will also comment on how some of the work mentioned in the citation illuminates this emergent field. I will begin by framing the remarks in a much broader historical and philosophical context. I hasten to add that I am neither a historian nor a philosopher of science, as will become immediately obvious to any expert, but my impression is that if we look back to the modern era of science then major figures such as Galileo, Kepler, Leibniz, and New- ton were neither physicists nor mathematicans. Rather they were Natural Philosophers. Even around the turn of the 19th century the same could still be said of Bernoulli, Euler, Lagrange, and Hamilton. But a real divide between Mathematics and Physics began to open up in the 19th century.
    [Show full text]
  • Quantum Information Science Activities at NSF
    Quantum Information Science Activities at NSF Some History, Current Programs, and Future Directions Presentation for HEPAP 11/29/2018 Alex Cronin, Program Director National Science Foundation Physics Division QIS @ NSF goes back a long time Wootters & Zurek (1982) “A single quantum cannot be cloned”. Nature, 299, 802 acknowledged NSF Award 7826592 [PI: John A. Wheeler, UT Austin] C. Caves (1981) “Quantum Mechanical noise in an interferometer” PRD, 23,1693 acknowledged NSF Award 7922012 [PI: Kip Thorne, Caltech] “Information Mechanics (Computer and Information Science)” NSF Award 8618002; PI: Tommaso Toffoli, MIT; Start: 1987 led to one of the “basic building blocks for quantum computation” - Blatt, PRL, 102, 040501 (2009), “Realization of the Quantum Toffoli Gate with Trapped Ions” “Research on Randomized Algorithms, Complexity Theory, and Quantum Computers” NSF Award 9310214; PI: Umesh Vazirani, UC-Berkeley; Start: 1993 led to a quantum Fourier transform algorithm, later used by Shor QIS @ NSF goes back a long time Quantum Statistics of Nonclassical, Pulsed Light Fields Award: 9224779; PI: Michael Raymer, U. Oregon - Eugene; NSF Org:PHY Complexity Studies in Communications and Quantum Computations Award: 9627819; PI: Andrew Yao, Princeton; NSF Org:CCF Quantum Logic, Quantum Information and Quantum Computation Award: 9601997; PI: David MacCallum, Carleton College; NSF Org:SES Physics of Quantum Computing Award: 9802413; PI:Julio Gea-Banacloche, U Arkansas; NSF Org:PHY Quantum Foundations and Information Theory Using Consistent Histories Award: 9900755; PI: Robert Griffiths, Carnegie-Mellon U; NSF Org:PHY QIS @ NSF goes back a long time ITR: Institute for Quantum Information Award: 0086038; PI: John Preskill; Co-PI:John Doyle, Leonard Schulman, Axel Scherer, Alexei Kitaev, CalTech; NSF Org: CCF Start: 09/01/2000; Award Amount:$5,012,000.
    [Show full text]
  • Alexei Kitaev, Annals of Physics 321 2-111
    Annals of Physics 321 (2006) 2–111 www.elsevier.com/locate/aop Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond Alexei Kitaev * California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, CA 91125, USA Received 21 October 2005; accepted 25 October 2005 Abstract A spin-1/2 system on a honeycomb lattice is studied.The interactions between nearest neighbors are of XX, YY or ZZ type, depending on the direction of the link; different types of interactions may differ in strength.The model is solved exactly by a reduction to free fermions in a static Z2 gauge field.A phase diagram in the parameter space is obtained.One of the phases has an energy gap and carries excitations that are Abelian anyons.The other phase is gapless, but acquires a gap in the presence of magnetic field.In the latter case excitations are non-Abelian anyons whose braiding rules coincide with those of conformal blocks for the Ising model.We also consider a general theory of free fermions with a gapped spectrum, which is characterized by a spectral Chern number m.The Abelian and non-Abelian phases of the original model correspond to m = 0 and m = ±1, respectively. The anyonic properties of excitation depend on m mod 16, whereas m itself governs edge thermal transport.The paper also provides mathematical background on anyons as well as an elementary theory of Chern number for quasidiagonal matrices. Ó 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. 1. Comments to the contents: what is this paper about? Certainly, the main result of the paper is an exact solution of a particular two-dimen- sional quantum model.However, I was sitting on that result for too long, trying to perfect it, derive some properties of the model, and put them into a more general framework.Thus many ramifications have come along.Some of them stem from the desire to avoid the use of conformal field theory, which is more relevant to edge excitations rather than the bulk * Fax: +1 626 5682764.
    [Show full text]
  • Vortices and Other Topological Solitons in Dense Quark Matter
    Preprint number: XXXX-XXXX Vortices and Other Topological Solitons in Dense Quark Matter Minoru Eto1, Yuji Hirono2;3;4, Muneto Nitta5y, and Shigehiro Yasui6 z 1Department of Physics, Yamagata University, Kojirakawa 1-4-12, Yamagata, Yamagata 990-8560, Japan 2Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Hongo 7-3-1, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0033, Japan 3Theoretical Research Division, Nishina Center, RIKEN, Wako 351-0198, Japan 4Department of Physics, Sophia University, Tokyo 102-8554, Japan 5Department of Physics, and Research and Education Center for Natural Sciences, Keio University, Hiyoshi 4-1-1, Yokohama, Kanagawa 223-8521, Japan 6KEK Theory Center, Institute of Particle and Nuclear Studies, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK), 1-1 Oho, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-0801, Japan ∗E-mail: [email protected] ............................................................................... Dense quantum chromodynamic matter accommodates various kind of topological solitons such as vortices, domain walls, monopoles, kinks, boojums and so on. In this review, we discuss various properties of topological solitons in dense quantum chro- modynamics (QCD) and their phenomenological implications. A particular emphasis is placed on the topological solitons in the color-flavor-locked (CFL) phase, which exhibits both superfluidity and superconductivity. The properties of topological solitons are dis- cussed in terms of effective field theories such as the Ginzburg-Landau theory, the chiral Lagrangian, or the Bogoliubov{de Gennes equation. The most fundamental string-like topological excitations in the CFL phase are the non-Abelian vortices, which are 1/3 quantized superfluid vortices and color magnetic flux tubes. These vortices are created at a phase transition by the Kibble-Zurek mechanism or when the CFL phase is realized in compact stars, which rotate rapidly.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Holes and Entanglement Entropy
    Black holes and entanglement entropy Thesis by Pouria Dadras In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Physics CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2021 Defended May 18, 2021 ii © 2021 Pouria Dadras ORCID: 0000-0002-5077-3533 All rights reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First and foremost, I am truly indebted to my advisor, Alexei Kitaev, for many reasons: providing an atmosphere in which my only concern was doing research, teaching me how to deal with a hard problem, how to breaking it into small parts and solving each, many helpful suggestions and discussions tht we had in the past five years that I was his students, sharing some of his ideas and notes with me, ··· . I am also grateful to the other members of the Committee, Sean Carroll, Anton Kapustin, and David Simmons-Duffin for joining my talk, and also John Preskill for joining my Candidacy exam and having discussions. I am also grateful to my parents in Iran who generously supported me during the time that I have been in the United states. I am also Thankful to my friends, Saeed, Peyman, Omid, Fariborz, Ehsan, Aryan, Pooya, Parham, Sharareh, Pegah, Christina, Pengfei, Yingfei, Josephine, and others. iv ABSTRACT We study the deformation of the thermofield-double ¹TFDº under evolution by a double-traced operator by computing its entanglement entropy. After saturation, the entanglement change leads to the temperature change. In Jackiw-Teitelboim gravity, the new temperature can be computed independently from two- point function by considering the Schwarzian modes. We will also derive the entanglement entropy from the Casimir associated with the SL(2,R) symmetry.
    [Show full text]
  • Operator Growth Bounds in a Cartoon Matrix Model
    Operator growth bounds in a cartoon matrix model Andrew Lucas1, ∗ and Andrew Osborne1, y 1Department of Physics and Center for Theory of Quantum Matter, University of Colorado, Boulder CO 80309, USA (Dated: July 15, 2020) We study operator growth in a model of N(N − 1)=2 interacting Majorana fermions, which live on the edges of a complete graph of N vertices. Terms in the Hamiltonian are proportional to the product of q fermions which live on the edges of cycles of length q. This model is a cartoon \matrix model": the interaction graph mimics that of a single-trace matrix model, which can be holographically dual to quantum gravity. We prove (non-perturbatively in 1=N, and without averaging over any ensemble) that the scrambling time of this model is at least of order log N, consistent with the fast scrambling conjecture. We comment on apparent similarities and differences between operator growth in our \matrix model" and in the melonic models. CONTENTS 1. Introduction 1 2. Summary of results 2 3. Mathematical preliminaries 3 3.1. Sets and graphs 3 3.2. Majorana fermions and operator size4 3.3. The cartoon matrix model 5 3.4. Time evolution as a quantum walk7 3.5. Bound on the Lyapunov exponent8 4. Operator growth in the Majorana matrix model9 4.1. Bounding operator growth rates 9 4.2. Comparison to the Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev model 15 Acknowledgements 16 References 16 1. INTRODUCTION Our best hint to the unification of gravity with quantum mechanics arises from the holographic principle [1,2]. Some quantum mechanical systems in D spacetime dimensions, with a large N number of degrees of freedom \per site" (e.g.
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2007.07270V1 [Hep-Th]
    The Cosmological Constant: A Categorical View Fen Zuo∗ Abstract Some theoretic results related to the cosmological constant, obtained in the 80’s and 90’s of last century, are reviewed. These results exhibit some interesting underlying pattern when viewed from a category- theoretic perspective. In doing this, we illustrate how Baez and Dolan’s Periodic Table of k-tuply monoidal n-categories can serve as a basic framework of a quantum spacetime structure. Explicitly, we show how Einstein gravity (with the cosmological constant turned on) emerges when we de-categorify certain 2-tuply monoidal 2-categories properly, as Crane proposed a long time ago. In particular, we find that some recent work on Vertex Operator Algebras and 4-manifolds fits nicely into this framework. arXiv:2007.07270v1 [hep-th] 13 Jul 2020 ∗ Email: [email protected] 1 Contents I. Introduction 3 A. The notation 4 II. 3D 4 A. Euclidean case 4 B. Lorentzian case 7 III. 2D 8 A. Euclidean case 8 B. Lorentzian case 9 IV. 4D 10 A. Euclidean case 11 1. Barrett-Crane Model 11 2. Anyon-Condensation Picture 12 3. Gravity From Condensation? 15 4. Cosmological Constant 17 B. Lorentzian case 18 1. Identifying “Time” 18 2. Emergence of 4D Lorentz Symmetry 20 3. Cosmological Constant 20 V. Categorification 21 A. Motivation 21 B. General framework 24 1. Vertex Operator Algebras 24 2. Theory X and 4D topological invariants 24 3. VOA[M4] and 2-Tannaka-Krein duality 27 4. Gravity and Cosmological Constant 28 VI. Discussion 30 Note added: 31 2 Acknowledgments 32 References 32 I.
    [Show full text]
  • Jugendtraum Focus Week
    Institute for the Physics and Mathematics of the Universe World Premier International Research Center Initiative 数物連携宇宙研究機構 世界トップレベル研究拠点プログラム The University of Tokyo 東京大学 Feature Jugendtraum Interview with George F. Smoot Focus Week: NEWS Condensed Matter Physics Meets High Energy Physics No. 9 March 2010 IPMU NEWS CONTENTS English Japanese 3 Director’s Corner Hitoshi Murayama 23 Director’s Corner 村山 斉 Science of the Universe 宇宙を科学する 4 Feature Kyoji Saito 24 Feature 斎藤 恭司 Jugendtraum of a mathematician 一数学者の青春の夢 10 Our Team Won Sang Cho 30 Our Team 趙 元相 Johanna Knapp ヨハンナ・クナップ Takahiro Nishimichi 西道 啓博 Masaomi Tanaka 田中 雅臣 Masahito Yamazaki 山﨑 雅人 12 IPMU Interview with George F. Smoot 32 IPMU Interview ジョージ・スムート教授に聞く 16 Workshop Report 36 Workshop Report Focus Week: Condensed Matter Physics Meets フォーカスウィーク：物性と素粒子の対話 High Energy Physics 18 News 38 News 22 Temperature anisotropies in cosmic 40 宇宙マイクロ波背景放射の温度揺らぎ microwave background radiation 杉山 直 Naoshi Sugiyama Kyoji Saito is IPMU Professor and a principal investigator. He is a world-leading mathematician in complex analytic geometry. His theories on primitive forms and innite dimensional Lie algebras appear in recent theoretical physics, in particular, in topological string theory as the Landau-Ginzburg theory. He graduated from the University of Tokyo in 1967 and received a Doctorate from Göttingen University in 1971. He became an associate professor at the University of Tokyo in 1976. In 1979 he moved to RIMS (Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences), Kyoto University. At RIMS he became a professor in 1987 and served as Director in 1996 - 1998. Since 2008 he has been IPMU Professor.
    [Show full text]
  • Memories of a Theoretical Physicist
    Memories of a Theoretical Physicist Joseph Polchinski Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics University of California Santa Barbara, CA 93106-4030 USA Foreword: While I was dealing with a brain injury and finding it difficult to work, two friends (Derek Westen, a friend of the KITP, and Steve Shenker, with whom I was recently collaborating), suggested that a new direction might be good. Steve in particular regarded me as a good writer and suggested that I try that. I quickly took to Steve's suggestion. Having only two bodies of knowledge, myself and physics, I decided to write an autobiography about my development as a theoretical physicist. This is not written for any particular audience, but just to give myself a goal. It will probably have too much physics for a nontechnical reader, and too little for a physicist, but perhaps there with be different things for each. Parts may be tedious. But it is somewhat unique, I think, a blow-by-blow history of where I started and where I got to. Probably the target audience is theoretical physicists, especially young ones, who may enjoy comparing my struggles with their own.1 Some dis- claimers: This is based on my own memories, jogged by the arXiv and IN- SPIRE. There will surely be errors and omissions. And note the title: this is about my memories, which will be different for other people. Also, it would not be possible for me to mention all the authors whose work might intersect mine, so this should not be treated as a reference work.
    [Show full text]