DOCSLIB.ORG

British Columbia Geological Survey Geological Fieldwork 1987

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
British Columbia Geological Survey Geological Fieldwork 1987 GEOLOGY OF DUKE AND HONEYMOON PIT AREAS, MONKMAN COAL DEPOSIT, NORTHEAST BRITISH COLUMBIA COALFIELD* (93U15) By C. B. Wightson KEYWORDS: Coal geology, Monkman coal deposit, com- The joint venture group has presented a proposal to the puter modelling, Minnes Group, Bullhead Group, Fort St. provincial government for an open-pit mine capable of pro- John Group, Smoky Group. ducing 3 million tonnes per year of metallurgical coal. This proposal has obtained Stage I1 approval. The objectives of INTRODUCTION the author's project are 'to provide a detailed geolo;:ical Coallicences were initiallyacquired on the Monkman interpretation of the proposed mine area and to develop a computer-based model of Ithe coal deposit. Information built property by Mclntyre Mines Limited in 1970. Exploration mapping and drilling programs have been conducted over a into the model will be used to calculate: coal reserves and 17-yearperiod by Mclntyre Mines Limited, Canadian stripping ratios. An assessment of the coal deposit will be Superior Exploration Ltd., Pacific Petroleums Ltd. and Pe- available to the provincid government at thetime that a trocanada Inc. The Monkman project is a joint venture mining project is initiatecl at Monkman. Methodology and between Petro-Canada, Mobil Oil Ltd., Smoky River Coal computer technology developed during this project will be Ltd. and Sumitomo Corporation, with Petro-Canada acting used to model and assess other coal deposits and to assist as operator. with the interpretation of ruuctural geology. LOCATION AND ACCESS The Monkman coal deposit is located in the southern part of the Northeast British Columbia Coalfield approxim;ltely 30 kilometres southeast of the Quintette mine and 35 tilo- metres southeast of Tumbler Ridge (Figwe 4-7-11,The pro- ject area covers 140 square kilometres in the inner foolhills region of theRocky Molmtains. The Monkmanproperty consists of 169 coal liceom which COVI:~39 587 hect;ues. The Duke Mountain Block, in which Duke and Honeymoon pits are located (Figure4-7-Z), encompas:ies 20 745 hect:ms. Coallicences owned by Petro-Canadamark the northern boundary of the study ar,:a and Fearless Creek mark!; the southernboundary. Kinuseo Creek valley cuts acros!: the northernpart of the area. The valley contains upto 100 metres of unconsolidated overburden (Figure 4-7-2)hhich covers part of theproposed Duke and Honeymoon pirs. Elevations vary from 9580 metres in the valley floor of Kinuseo Creek to 1742 metres at the top of Duke Mountain. Vegetation ranges from spceforests to alpine tundra. sl Access into the Monkman areais via the Monkman High- way, a dry-weather road which parallels Kinuseo Creek. and extends to just west of Kinuseo Falls OCI the Murray River. The Monkman Highway c.an be reached by gravel roads From Tumbler Ridge; Elmworth, Alberta; or from Dawson Creek along the HeritageHighway. An airstrip near Thunder Moun- tain permits access by light plane. Numerous coal explora- tion roads, petroleum industry access roads and seismiclines provide excellent access I:O most parts of the project ;area. FIELDWORK -10 krn Prior to the 1987 field season, all pertinent open file coal assessment reports were examined. Geological maps of the Figure 4-7-1.Study area location map with Monkman property area were used to obtain digitized outc~rop informatioxA coal licences. computer-based outcrop database was designed to ston: the ~ ____ * This project is a contribution to the CanaddBritish Columbia Mineral Development Agreement. British Columbia Ministry of Energy, Mines and Petroleum Resources, Geological Fieldwork, 1987. Wper 1'988.1 47 I LEGEND [(3 GATES FM. - PIT BOUNDARY \ \ OVERBURDENTHICKNESS 4 I Figure 4-72, Subcmp map of the Gates Formation showing unconsolidated overburden thickness and Duke and Honeymoon pits 412 information. Once completed, outcrop maps were produced record. Data points can be referenced and retrieved based and examined to identify areas which lacked dataand to upon locational parameters. drill-hole identification, or strat- indicate areas with structural complexities or interpretation igraphic horizon. problems.Subsequent field mapping concentrated on COIL Outcrop data were digitlzed using a GTCO digitizer 'con- lecting additional outcrop data at these locations and verify- nected to a Compaq portable 286 compu1.er. Database main- ing the informationover the remaining parts of themap tainance and data processing and display were managed on a sheet. New data were plotted on topographic maps at a scale Wyse pc286 computer. Peripheral dcvices inc1ud1:d a of 15000. Airphotos at a scale of 1:40 000 were used to Houston Instrument DMP-52plotter and an Epson FX-:!86e produce enlargements at a scale of 1:lO 000. Outcrop infor- printer. mation was also plotted on the photo enlargements. Database construction and maintainance were performed Field mapping was conducted in conjunction with map- using the Geological Analysis Package of Cal Data Ltd. ping carried out by W. Kilby and S. Johnston (1988) on NTS Display of the geological data was facilitated by the Slruc- map sheets 931114,931i15 and 93Pi02 at a scale of 150 000. tural Analysis module of !.he Geological Analysis Package, Some outcrop datain the southeast comer of the geology map with a number of modifications by the author. StNc:ural (Figure 4-7-3) is from this source. Information from 1955 analysis of the outcrop data and drill-hole information pro- outcrop data points and 21 1 drill holes was examined and cessing was performed wil:h programs written by the author. incorporated into the geological interpretation. Outcrop data were digitized from geologicalmaps using programs written by W. Kilby. Figures were produced using the ECAD computer-aided drafting program. METHODOLOGY AND DATA HANDLING STRATIGRAPHY Computer-based methods have been used extensively to assist with data handling and display. Orientation parameters Strataexposed in thearea range from theLower describing the geological structural features were calculated Cretaceous to Jurassic M.innes Group, to the Upper Cre- using computer-based numerical procedures (Charlesworth taceous Kaskapau Formati,sn.The stratigraphy in the are.i has ef a/.,1976). beendescribed extensive!!y by Stott (1968 and 1982) and others. Descriptions of sedimentology and depositional en- Cross-sections were constructed by projecting outcropand vironments are beyond the scope of thi:s study and arc not drill-hole data down plunge onto planes of cross-section. includedhere. Table 4-7-.1 summarizes each formatica in Assuming that the folded surfaces approximate cylindricity, terms of a general description and the thickness specific to the data can be reliably projected parallel to the fold axis. the Monkman location. Thicknesses and descriptions were Lack of data, or poordistribution of orientations along both obtained from outcrop information, coalexploration drill limbs and across the hinge zone of a fold, may result in holes and petroleum industry exploration wells. Texaco Ex- unreliable fold axes orientations. In these cases an appropri- ploration Canada Ltd. drilled an explaration well, ExEx ate projection axisor fold axis orientation may he obtained by Flatbed a-21-Fi93-1-15, in the northeas): comer of the map visually best-fitting the data by trial and error, using several area (Figure The entire stratigraphic sequence, from different projection orientations. 4-7-3). the Minnes to the Kaskapau, is penetratemi by this hole. Brief Thick unconsolidated overburden covers parts of both the descriptions of the stratigaphy follow. Duke and Honeymoon pit areas. Visual best-fit fold axes orientations were determined in these areas. MINNES GROUP General data-handling methods are similar to those de- scribed by Kilby and Wrightson (1987). Drill-hole data have The Minnes Group con,iistsof both marine and nonmarine been incorporated into this study in a computer processible strata rangingin age from Jurassic to Early Cretaceous. format. Information wasdivided intoprimary,secondary and Lithologies include interbedded sandstones, siltstone!; and tertiary categories and entered into three independent raw shales with minor coal seams. data files. Primary data consist of drill-hole identification, location (easting, northing and elevation), overburden thick- BULLHEADGROUP ness, total depth and original hole orientation measured as the hole trend and plunge. Secondary data consist of drill- CADOMINFORMATION hole deviation data entered as the measurement depth, the The Cadomin Formationunconfonnably overlie$ the hole trend and the deviation measured in degrees from ver- Minnes Group. It is approximately 45 metres thick and tical.Tertiary data consist of thedrilled depths and the consists of two hands of chert and qua.rtzite conglom.erate identifying names of the horizons of interest. The raw data separated by sandstone.The conglomerate framework is files were then processed to yield three additional files con- poorly sorted and ranges From grit to cobhle-size fragments. taining the data in formats ready to be processed or plotted on The Cadomin Formation is easily mappable with prominent maps or cross-sections. Primary data for each drill hole are ridges often indicating its; outcrop. stored as separate records with indexing information used to locate the specific secondary and tertiary data for that hole. Secondary and tertiary data are stored in separate files as GETHINCFORMATION eastings, northings and elevationsin format ready for posting Gething strata consist of 140 metres of interbedded sand-
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Study of Potential Co-Product Trace Elements Within the Clear Hills Iron Deposits, Northwestern Alberta
    Special Report 08 A Study of Potential Co-Product Trace Elements Within the Clear Hills Iron Deposits, Northwestern Alberta NTS 83M,N, 84C,D A STUDY OF POTENTIAL CO-PRODUCT TRACE ELEMENTS WITHIN THE CLEAR HILLS IRON DEPOSITS, NORTHWESTERN ALBERTA Prepared for Research and Technology Branch, Alberta Energy Prepared by APEX Geoscience Ltd. (Project 97213) In cooperation with The Alberta Geological Survey, Energy and Utility Board And Marum Resources Ltd. February, 1999 R.A. Olson D. R. Eccles C.J. Collom A STUDY OF POTENTIAL CO-PRODUCT TRACE ELEMENTS WITHIN THE CLEAR HILLS IRON DEPOSITS, NORTHWESTERN ALBERTA TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND DISCLAIMER ....................................................... vi 1.0 SUMMARY ........................................................................................................1 2.0 INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................3 2.1 Preamble....................................................................................................3 2.2 Location, Access, Physiography, Bedrock Exposure .................................4 2.3 Synopsis of Prior Scientific Studies of the Clear Hills Iron Deposits, and the Stratigraphically Correlative Bad Heart Formation ...............................4 2.4 Synopsis of Prior Exploration of the Clear Hills Iron Deposits....................6 3.0 GEOLOGY ........................................................................................................7 3.1 Introduction
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentation of the Kimmeridge Clay Formation in the Cleveland Basin (Yorkshire, UK)
    minerals Article Sedimentation of the Kimmeridge Clay Formation in the Cleveland Basin (Yorkshire, UK) Elizabeth Atar 1,2,* , Andrew C. Aplin 1, Violaine Lamoureux-Var 3, Christian März 4 and Thomas Wagner 5 1 Department of Earth Sciences, Durham University, South Road, Durham DH1 3LE, UK; [email protected] 2 BP, Chertsey Rd, Sunbury-on-Thames, Middlesex TW16 7LN, UK 3 IFP Energies nouvelles, 1 et 4 Avenue de Bois-Préau, 92500 Rueil-Malmaison, France; [email protected] 4 School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, UK; [email protected] 5 Lyell Centre, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Received: 27 September 2020; Accepted: 29 October 2020; Published: 2 November 2020 Abstract: Fine-grained sedimentary successions contain the most detailed record of past environmental conditions. High-resolution analyses of these successions yield important insights into sedimentary composition and depositional processes and are, therefore, required to contextualise and interpret geochemical data which are commonly used as palaeoclimate proxies. The Kimmeridge Clay Formation (KCF) is a 500 m-thick mudstone succession deposited throughout the North Sea in the Late Jurassic and records environmental conditions through this time. Here, we present petrographic analyses (on 36 thin sections) on a 50 m section of a KCF core from the Cleveland Basin (Yorkshire, UK) to investigate controls on sedimentation in this region during the Tithonian, Late Jurassic. Facies descriptions demonstrate that deposition took place in a hydrodynamically variable environment in which the sediment origins, sediment dispersal mechanisms, and redox conditions fluctuated on the scale of thousands of years.
    [Show full text]
  • Alberta Table of Formations
    3D PGF v2 Model Fort Northern Central Southern Southern West- East- Northwest Northeast McMurray Grande ERATHEM / ERA Mountains Mountains Mountains Plains Central Central Plains Prairie Plains and Edmonton and Edmonton and Edmonton Edmonton Plains Edson Edmonton Plains Edmonton Edmonton Edmonton SYSTEM / PERIOD Foothills Jasper Foothills Foothills OF YEARS Banff SERIES / EPOCH Calgary AGE IN MILLIONS Blairmore Medicine STAGE / AGE Hat GC MC GC MC GC MC Laurentide Laurentide B Laurentide B B Laurentide Cordilleran Laurentide Cordilleran Laurentide Laurentide Cordilleran Cordilleran Laurentide BL BL QUATERNARY PLEISTOCENE Cordilleran EMPRESS EMPRESS EMPRESS EMPRESS EMPRESS PLIOCENE 2.6 5.3 DEL BONITA ARROWWOOD HAND HILLS WHITECOURT MOUNTAIN HALVERSON RIDGE PELICAN MOUNTAIN 7 NEOGENE MIOCENE 23 zone 1 OLIGOCENE CYPRESS HILLS OBED MOUNTAIN SWAN HILLS 34 EOCENE CENOZOIC 56 DALEHURST PALEOGENE PASKAPOOModel ZonesPASKAPOO PASKAPOO LACOMBE PALEOCENE HAYNES zonesPORCUPINE 2-3 HILLS PORCUPINE HILLS UPPER UPPER COALSPUR COALSPUR UPPER RAVENSCRAG UPPER 66 LOWER WILLOW CREEK WILLOW CK SCOLLARD SCOLLARD 01ENTRANCEsediment CONGLOMERATE above bedrock (surficial deposits) LOWER LOWER FRENCHMAN LOWER BATTLE BATTLE BATTLE WHITEMUD WHITEMUD MAASTRICHTIAN Bedrock topography CARBON ST. MARY RIVER ST. MARY RIVER HORSESHOE TOLMAN MORRIN UPPER UPPER EASTEND CANYON HORSESHOE 02 Paskapoo and Porcupine Hills formations HORSETHIEF CANYON 72 DRUMHELLER BLOOD RESERVE BLOOD RESERVE EDMONTON UPPER SAUNDERS SAUNDERS WAPITI / BRAZEAU STRATHMORE BRAZEAUScollard, Willow
    [Show full text]
  • Characterization and Evaluation of Deltaic Sandstone Reservoirs of the Dunvegan Formation, Kaybob South Arman Ghanbari, Steven M
    Characterization and Evaluation of Deltaic Sandstone Reservoirs of the Dunvegan Formation, Kaybob South Arman Ghanbari, Steven M. Werner, Lukas Sadownyk, Matthew Gonzalez, and Per Kent Pedersen Department of Geoscience, University of Calgary, Canada Summary Sandstones of the Cretaceous Dunvegan Formation within and around the Kaybob South Field are part of a legacy gas pool producing from a complex delta lobe. It is important to note that recently, oil production has also picked up in this area mainly with the implementation of horizontal wells. This presentation will investigate the complexities and variations of the Dunvegan from a geological perspective. Further, investigation will be undertaken on recent developments on a potential light oil play using horizontal drilling in the fine-grained deltaic sandstones of the Dunvegan. Introduction The Dunvegan Formation is a prolific gas producing unit in west-central Alberta. It was discovered in the 1950’s and has recently received attention for its oil production in horizontal wells within and near the Kaybob South (Figure 1). The area of focus in this study is the southwest of the Kaybob South region (Figure 1). This region also exhibits oil production on the peripheries of the pool where horizontal wells are located. The Dunvegan is stratigraphically trapped with deltaic sands acting as reservoir. The Dunvegan delta Figure 1. Adapted from Bhattacharya., 1994 – Kaybob gas pool is itself contains highly river marked by the yellow dot. The pool of study is within the red box where dominated deltas and a map of cumulative production is shown. Red production bubbles transgressive sheet sands indicate this is a gas dominated pool.
    [Show full text]
  • Paleontology and Stratigraphy of Upper Coniacianemiddle
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln USGS Staff -- Published Research US Geological Survey 2005 Paleontology and stratigraphy of upper Coniacianemiddle Santonian ammonite zones and application to erosion surfaces and marine transgressive strata in Montana and Alberta W. A. Cobban U.S. Geological Survey T. S. Dyman U.S. Geological Survey, [email protected] K. W. Porter Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub Part of the Earth Sciences Commons Cobban, W. A.; Dyman, T. S.; and Porter, K. W., "Paleontology and stratigraphy of upper Coniacianemiddle Santonian ammonite zones and application to erosion surfaces and marine transgressive strata in Montana and Alberta" (2005). USGS Staff -- Published Research. 367. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsstaffpub/367 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the US Geological Survey at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. It has been accepted for inclusion in USGS Staff -- Published Research by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. Cretaceous Research 26 (2005) 429e449 www.elsevier.com/locate/CretRes Paleontology and stratigraphy of upper Coniacianemiddle Santonian ammonite zones and application to erosion surfaces and marine transgressive strata in Montana and Alberta W.A. Cobban a,1, T.S. Dyman b,*, K.W. Porter c a US Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225, USA b US Geological Survey, Denver, CO 80225, USA c Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology, Butte, MT 59701, USA Received 28 September 2004; accepted in revised form 17 January 2005 Available online 21 June 2005 Abstract Erosional surfaces are present in middle and upper Coniacian rocks in Montana and Alberta, and probably at the base of the middle Santonian in the Western Interior of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Blind Thrusts and Fault-Related Folds Int Eh Upper Cretaceous Alberta
    BULLETIN OF CANADIAN PETROLEUM GEOLOGY VOL. 55, NO. 2 (JUNE, 2007), P. 125–137 Blind thrusts and fault-related folds in the Upper Cretaceous Alberta Group, deep basin, west-central Alberta: implications for fractured reservoirs BRUCE S. HART BOGDAN L. VARBAN Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Department of Earth Sciences McGill University University of Western Ontario 3450 University Street London, ON N6A 5B7 Montreal, QC H3A 2A7 KURT J. MARFURT A. GUY PLINT Allied Geophysics Laboratories Department of Earth Sciences Geosciences Department University of Western Ontario University of Houston London, ON N6A 5B7 Houston, TX 77204-5007 ABSTRACT 3-D seismic and log-based mapping of Upper Cretaceous units in the Deep Basin has revealed the presence of fault-related folds in the Cardium Formation and overlying units. The folds formed above low-angle thrust faults that cut clay-rich shales in the lower part of the Kaskapau Formation. Seismic data indicate a fold wavelength of approximately 5 to 8 km at the Cardium level, with fold axes trending NW-SE. Log-based stratigraphic analyses identified fault repeats of Kaskapau allomembers, whereas the 3-D seismic data show details of upward-branching fault splays and related folds. The faults also splay laterally, and transfer strain by overlapping. Post-stack processing of the original 3-D volume, including noise reduction, coherency processing, and volumetric dip analyses significantly improved our ability to image and map these structures. The Cardium Formation produces oil in the study area from fields with orientations that are approximately parallel to the fold axes. These production trends are thought to be related primarily to depositional trends that predate the structural deformation.
    [Show full text]
  • Allostratigraphic Analysis of the Muskiki and Marshybank Formations
    Allostratigraphic analysis of the Muskiki and Marshybank Formations (Coniacian) in the Central Alberta Foothills and Plains: Possible evidence for an eustatic control on deposition Elizabeth Hooper, Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B7 [email protected] and A Guy Plint, Department of Earth Sciences, The University of Western Ontario, London, ON, N6A 5B7 [email protected] Summary The Muskiki and Marshybank formations, of Upper Cretaceous (Coniacian) age, form a major transgressive-regressive depositional cycle, about 100 m thick, that can be mapped throughout the Cretaceous foredeep of Western Canada. Detailed allostratigraphic results are lacking for central Alberta between townships 26 and 44; this study is designed to fill that knowledge gap. The investigation is based on detailed outcrop observation in the Foothills, linked to a regional allostratigraphic framework based on wireline logs. The studied rocks represent primarily shallow- marine environments and are abundantly fossiliferous. The rocks are organized into upward shoaling successions of mudstone and fine sandstone, typically 5-15 m thick. Successions are bounded by marine flooding surfaces that commonly bear pebble lags. Although the upward-shoaling successions resemble simple parasequences, the presence of winnowed pebble lags suggest a terminal period of shallowing and even subaerial emergence. The successions may therefore be interpreted as seaward expressions of depositional sequences. Repeated relative sea-level rise-fall cycles, on a timescale of a few hundred kyr, strongly suggest an eustatic control, plausibly attributable to glacio-eustasy in the Milankovitch band. Introduction The Muskiki and Marshybank formations of the Western Canada Cretaceous foredeep (Stott, 1963, 1967), comprise a major transgressive-regressive depositional cycle, about 100 m thick, that can be mapped from NE British Columbia at least as far south as northern Montana.
    [Show full text]
  • Kaybob Dunvegan Oil: a Not-So Unconventional Oil Play
    Kaybob Dunvegan Oil: A Not-So Unconventional Oil Play Alison E. Essery, Jim C Campbell, Tangle Creek Energy. Suzan Moore, Moore Rocks. Teresa Marin, Petrography Consulting. Industry has become focused on “tight” or “unconventional oil resources”. Significant recent activity includes horizontal oil completions in conventional tighter marine sandstones such as the Cardium, Viking and Montney formations. These reservoirs comprise mappable sandstone targets, albeit with lesser permeability than discoveries made twenty years ago. The Kaybob Cretaceous Dunvegan oil play has very similar reservoir characteristics and more than 95 Dunvegan horizontals have been drilled in the last three years resulting in significant light oil production. The Dunvegan formation was exploited as a gas- and oil-bearing fluvial/deltaic play for several decades. The first horizontals were drilled in thick fluvial channels in the mid-1990s in the Latornell/Ante Creek/Simonette areas of Alberta. Recent oil production is occurring in more marine settings. The formation has been extensively studied and documented by many authors (e.g. Bhattacharya et al 1991, Plint 2000). Several clinoforming units or shingles (G-E) are interpreted to prograde to the east into coastal areas. In particular, the delta associated with the Dunvegan E unit at Kaybob incised far into the marine environment, so that it was subjected to the reworking process of waves and tides. Core and cuttings work contributed greatly to confidence of the interpretation of wave and tide reworked shorefaces. Detailed core work revealed good examples of shorefaces overlying slumped delta front sandstones as well as tidal bundles associated with the tidal currents. Core to log calibration showed that gamma log signatures can be unreliable for facies identification.
    [Show full text]
  • Bedrock Geology of Alberta
    Alberta Geological Survey Map 600 Legend Bedrock Geology of Alberta Southwestern Plains Southeastern Plains Central Plains Northwestern Plains Northeastern Plains NEOGENE (± PALEOGENE) NEOGENE ND DEL BONITA GRAVELS: pebble gravel with some cobbles; minor thin beds and lenses NH HAND HILLS FORMATION: gravel and sand, locally cemented into conglomerate; gravel of sand; pebbles consist primarily of quartzite and argillite with minor amounts of sandstone, composed of mainly quartzite and sandstone with minor amounts of chert, arkose, and coal; fluvial amygdaloidal basalt, and diabase; age poorly constrained; fluvial PALEOGENE PALEOGENE PALEOGENE (± NEOGENE) PALEOGENE (± NEOGENE) UPLAND GRAVEL: gravel composed of mainly white quartzite cobbles and pebbles with lesser amounts of UPLAND GRAVEL: gravel capping the Clear Hills, Halverson Ridge, and Caribou Mountains; predominantly .C CYPRESS HILLS FORMATION: gravel and sand, locally cemented to conglomerate; mainly quartzite .G .G and sandstone clasts with minor chert and quartz component; fluvial black chert pebbles; sand matrix; minor thin beds and lenses of sand; includes gravel in the Swan Hills area; white quartzite cobbles and pebbles with lesser amounts of black chert pebbles; quartzite boulders occur in the age poorly constrained; fluvial Clear Hills and Halverson Ridge gravels; sand matrix; ages poorly constrained; extents poorly defined; fluvial .PH PORCUPINE HILLS FORMATION: olive-brown mudstone interbedded with fine- to coarse-grained, .R RAVENSCRAG FORMATION: grey to buff mudstone
    [Show full text]
  • Geologic Map of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park Region, Tennessee and North Carolina
    Prepared in cooperation with the National Park Service Geologic Map of the Great Smoky Mountains National Park Region, Tennessee and North Carolina By Scott Southworth, Art Schultz, John N. Aleinikoff, and Arthur J. Merschat Pamphlet to accompany Scientific Investigations Map 2997 Supersedes USGS Open-File Reports 03–381, 2004–1410, and 2005–1225 2012 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior KEN SALAZAR, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey Marcia K. McNutt, Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2012 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment, visit http://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod To order this and other USGS information products, visit http://store.usgs.gov Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted materials contained within this report. Suggested citation: Southworth, Scott, Schultz, Art, Aleinikoff, J.N., and Merschat, A.J., 2012, Geologic map of the Great Smoky Moun- tains National Park region, Tennessee and North Carolina: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Map 2997, one sheet, scale 1:100,000, and 54-p. pamphlet. (Supersedes USGS Open-File Reports 03–381, 2004–1410, and 2005–1225.) ISBN 978-1-4113-2403-9 Cover: Looking northeast toward Mount Le Conte, Tenn., from Clingmans Dome, Tenn.-N.C.
    [Show full text]
  • Paper 62-39 Stratigraphy of the Lower Cretaceous Fort St. John Group and Gething and Cadomin Formations, Foothills of Northern A
    PAPER 62-39 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOWER CRETACEOUS FORT ST. JOHN GROUP AND GETHING AND CADOMIN FORMATIONS, FOOTHILLS OF NORTHERN ALBERTA AND BRITISH COLUMBIA (Report 6 figures, appendix) D. F. Stott Price 75 cents 1963 GEOLOGICAL SURVEY OF CANADA CANADA PAPER 62-39 STRATIGRAPHY OF THE LOWER CRETACEOUS FORT ST. JOHN GROUP AND GETHING AND CADOMIN FORMATIONS, FOOTHILLS OF NORTHERN ALBERTA AND BRITISH COLUMBIA By D.F. Stott DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND TECHNICAL SURVEYS CANADA CONTENTS Page Introduction. • • • • • . • . • • . • • • . • . • • . • . • • • • • • • • . • • • • . • • • • • • 1 Field work and acknowledgments . • . • . • • • • • • 1 Stratigraphy. • • • • • . • . • • • • . • • . • . 3 Table of Formations . • . • . • • . • • • . • . • • • . • • • • • • • . • . • 4 Cadomin and Gething Formations. .... ... ... .......... 3 Cadomin Formation. • • • • • • . • • . • • • • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • . 5 Gething Formation.............................. 6 Fort St. John Group.................................. 8 Moosebar Formation...... ..... .... • • • . • • • • • • . 8 Gates Formation................................. 10 Commotion Formation............................ 11 Gates Member. • • • • . • • • • • • • . • • • • • • . • • • • • • • • • • 11 Hulcross Member... ......................... 14 Boulder Creek Member................... .... 15 Shaftesbury Formation . • • • • • • • • . • . • • . • . • • • • • • • • . 17 Hasler Formation....... ........................ 17 Goodrich Formation.............................. 18 Cruiser Formation..............
    [Show full text]
  • Subsurface Aquifer Study to Support Unconventional Gas and Oil Development, Liard Basin, Northeastern B.C
    SUBSURFACE AQUIFER STUDY TO SUPPORT UNCONVENTIONAL GAS AND OIL DEVELOPMENT, LIARD BASIN, NORTHEASTERN B.C. Prepared for Geoscience BC August, 2013 Petrel Robertson Consulting Ltd. TABLE OF CONTENTS Certificate of Qualification ......................................................................................................................... 1. Table of Contents ...................................................................................................................................... 2. List of Figures ............................................................................................................................................ 3. Regional Stratigraphic Cross-Sections ........................................................................................ 4. Introduction................................................................................................................................................ 5. Study Methodology ................................................................................................................................... 7. Regional Setting ........................................................................................................................................ 10. Geology and Hydrogeology of Aquifer Units ............................................................................................. 14. Chinchaga Formation ................................................................................................................... 15. Hydrogeology
    [Show full text]