DOCSLIB.ORG

Standard Investigation of the Impacts of Offshore Wind Turbines on the Marine

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Standard Investigation of the Impacts of Offshore Wind Turbines on the Marine Standard Investigation of the Impacts of Offshore Wind Turbines on the Marine Environment (StUK4) Standard Investigation of the Impacts of Offshore Wind Turbines on the Marine Environment (StUK4) Status: October 2013 Issued in co-operation with: Ralf Aumüller Brigitte Hielen Christian Pusch Lothar Bach Reinhold Hill Karsten Runge Hermann Baier Thoralf Hoth Andreas Schmidt Holger Behm Ommo Hüppop Jörg Scholle Anika Beiersdorf Michael Joost Ralf Thiel Michael Bellmann Rudolf Kafemann Frank Thomsen Klaus Betke Christian Ketzer Björn Russow Jan Blew Matthias Kloppmann Antje Seebens Axel Binder Annika Koch Marco Schilz Kristin Blasche Jana Kotzerka Alex Schubert Maria Boethling Jochen Krause Bastian Schuchardt Uwe Böttcher Roland Krone Axel Schulz Alexander Braasch Kathrin Krügel Norbert Schulz Timothy Coppack Jan Kube Max Schuster Michael Dähne Olaf Kühnast Alexander Schröder Hans-Peter Damian Martin Laczny Monika Stamm Jennifer Dannheim Alexander Liebschner Jens Stecher Ansgar Diederichs Tristan Lippert Matthias Steitz Tobias Dittmann Klaus Lucke Katharina Teschke Monika Dorsch Dennis Lummer Dieter Todeskino Siegfried Ehrich Bettina Mendel Ursula Verfuß Helena Feindt-Herr Thomas Merck Felix Weiß Elvira Fredrich Max Meyer Veronika Wahl Angelika Fuß Andreas Müller Gottfried Walter Joachim Gabriel Dirk Nentwig Helmut Wendeln Marco Gauger Martina Nemitz Manfred Zeiler Stefan Garthe Verena Peschko Carsten Zerbs Frank Gerdes Werner Piper Lars Gutow Claudia Propp © Bundesamt für Seeschifffahrt und Hydrographie (BSH) Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency Hamburg und Rostock 2013 www.bsh.de BSH-Nr. 7003 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission by the BSH. Cover photos courtesy of: Roland Krone, Mathias Putze, Klaus Lucke, alpha ventus/DOTI 2009 Contents 3 Inhalt Part A – Framework conditions ....................................................................................... 5 1 Preliminary remarks .......................................................................................... 5 2 Possible adverse impacts ................................................................................. 6 2.1 Construction phase ............................................................................................. 6 2.2 Operation phase .................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Decommissioning phase ..................................................................................... 6 3 Objectives .......................................................................................................... 7 4 Deviation from the StUK, updates .................................................................... 7 5 Positioning of measuring instruments ............................................................. 7 6 Quality assurance .............................................................................................. 7 7 Decommissioning phase .................................................................................. 8 8 Further studies and analyses ........................................................................... 8 9 Procedure for the implementation and evaluation of studies relating to the planning as well as construction and operation of offshore wind farms .... 9 10 Assessment period ............................................................................................ 10 10.1 Baseline study ..................................................................................................... 10 10.2 Construction phase ............................................................................................. 10 10.3 Operation phase .................................................................................................. 10 11 Cluster study ...................................................................................................... 11 12 Assessment region ............................................................................................ 11 12.1 Project area and assessment area ...................................................................... 11 12.1.1 Benthos/fish ........................................................................................................ 11 12.1.2 Avifauna/marine mammals .................................................................................. 12 12.2 Reference areas ................................................................................................... 12 12.2.1 Benthos/fish ........................................................................................................ 12 12.2.2 Avifauna/marine mammals .................................................................................. 13 13 Reporting ............................................................................................................ 13 13.1 Baseline study ..................................................................................................... 13 13.2 Monitoring ........................................................................................................... 14 Part B – Technical instructions ........................................................................................ 15 Features of conservation interest ................................................................................ 15 1 Benthos .............................................................................................................. 15 2 Fish ..................................................................................................................... 25 3 Avifauna .............................................................................................................. 27 3.1 Resting birds ....................................................................................................... 27 3.2 Migratory birds .................................................................................................... 30 4 Marine mammals ............................................................................................... 34 5 Bats .................................................................................................................... 40 6 Landscape .......................................................................................................... 41 4 Contents Part C – Annex: Survey of features of conservation interest ............................. 42 1 Benthos .............................................................................................................. 42 2 Fish ..................................................................................................................... 44 3 Avifauna (Resting and migratory birds) ........................................................... 53 3.1 Resting birds ....................................................................................................... 53 3.2 Migratory birds .................................................................................................... 62 4 Marine mammals ............................................................................................... 66 5 Bats ..................................................................................................................... 70 Literature ................................................................................................................................... 76 Abbreviations and acronyms ............................................................................................ 84 Links ............................................................................................................................................ 85 Part A – Framework conditions 5 Part A – Framework conditions 1 Preliminary remarks Within the framework of the approval procedure for offshore wind farms in the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ), potential adverse impacts of the planned facilities on the marine environment have to be assessed. Besides, in line with the German regulation § 3 Abs. 1 Nr. 1 UVPG i.V.m. Anlage 1, Nr. 1.6, an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) is now mandatory. In the Standard for Environmental Impact Assessments (StUK) at hand, information is pro- vided to applicants on the scope of investigations required by the planning approval/approval authority, with all relevant details and explanations. Likewise, the planning approval/approval holders and operators of wind farms are provided with detailed information about the require- ments for operation-phase monitoring, which is currently considered indispensable. The StUK constitutes a framework of the current thematic and technical minimum require- ments for marine environmental surveys and monitoring of constituent criteria as per § 5 Sec- tion. 6 No. 2 Seeanlagenverordnung (Marine Facilities Ordinance) from 23 January 1997 (BGBI – German Federal Law Gazette. I p. 57), last amended by Article 11 of the law from 21 January 2013 (BGBI. I p. 95), (hereinafter called SeeAnlV) as well as for monitoring during the construction and operation phase. The third update of the StUK is based on experience that has been gained with the versions of December 2001, February 2003 and on data from the surveys conducted in the context of the research project “Ökologische Begleitforschung am Offshore-Testfeldvorhaben alpha ventus zur Evaluierung
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Skates and Rays Diversity, Exploration and Conservation – Case-Study of the Thornback Ray, Raja Clavata
    UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL SKATES AND RAYS DIVERSITY, EXPLORATION AND CONSERVATION – CASE-STUDY OF THE THORNBACK RAY, RAJA CLAVATA Bárbara Marques Serra Pereira Doutoramento em Ciências do Mar 2010 UNIVERSIDADE DE LISBOA FACULDADE DE CIÊNCIAS DEPARTAMENTO DE BIOLOGIA ANIMAL SKATES AND RAYS DIVERSITY, EXPLORATION AND CONSERVATION – CASE-STUDY OF THE THORNBACK RAY, RAJA CLAVATA Bárbara Marques Serra Pereira Tese orientada por Professor Auxiliar com Agregação Leonel Serrano Gordo e Investigadora Auxiliar Ivone Figueiredo Doutoramento em Ciências do Mar 2010 The research reported in this thesis was carried out at the Instituto de Investigação das Pescas e do Mar (IPIMAR - INRB), Unidade de Recursos Marinhos e Sustentabilidade. This research was funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) through a PhD grant (SFRH/BD/23777/2005) and the research project EU Data Collection/DCR (PNAB). Skates and rays diversity, exploration and conservation | Table of Contents Table of Contents List of Figures ............................................................................................................................. i List of Tables ............................................................................................................................. v List of Abbreviations ............................................................................................................. viii Agradecimentos ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Annotated Checklist of the Chondrichthyan Fishes Inhabiting the Northern Gulf of Mexico Part 1: Batoidea
    Zootaxa 4803 (2): 281–315 ISSN 1175-5326 (print edition) https://www.mapress.com/j/zt/ Article ZOOTAXA Copyright © 2020 Magnolia Press ISSN 1175-5334 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.4803.2.3 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:325DB7EF-94F7-4726-BC18-7B074D3CB886 An annotated checklist of the chondrichthyan fishes inhabiting the northern Gulf of Mexico Part 1: Batoidea CHRISTIAN M. JONES1,*, WILLIAM B. DRIGGERS III1,4, KRISTIN M. HANNAN2, ERIC R. HOFFMAYER1,5, LISA M. JONES1,6 & SANDRA J. RAREDON3 1National Marine Fisheries Service, Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Mississippi Laboratories, 3209 Frederic Street, Pascagoula, Mississippi, U.S.A. 2Riverside Technologies Inc., Southeast Fisheries Science Center, Mississippi Laboratories, 3209 Frederic Street, Pascagoula, Missis- sippi, U.S.A. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2687-3331 3Smithsonian Institution, Division of Fishes, Museum Support Center, 4210 Silver Hill Road, Suitland, Maryland, U.S.A. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8295-6000 4 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8577-968X 5 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5297-9546 6 [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2228-7156 *Corresponding author. [email protected]; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5093-1127 Abstract Herein we consolidate the information available concerning the biodiversity of batoid fishes in the northern Gulf of Mexico, including nearly 70 years of survey data collected by the National Marine Fisheries Service, Mississippi Laboratories and their predecessors. We document 41 species proposed to occur in the northern Gulf of Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuckoo Ray (Leucoraja Naevus) in Division 9.A (Atlantic Iberian Waters)
    ICES Advice on fishing opportunities, catch, and effort Bay of Biscay and the Iberian Coast ecoregion Published 2 October 2020 Cuckoo ray (Leucoraja naevus) in Division 9.a (Atlantic Iberian waters) ICES advice on fishing opportunities ICES advises that when the precautionary approach is applied, catches should be no more than 120 tonnes in each of the years 2021 and 2022. If discard rates do not change from the average of the last five years (2015–2019), this implies landings of no more than 84 tonnes. Note: This advice sheet is abbreviated due to the COVID-19 disruption. The previous advice issued for 2019 and 2020 is attached as Annex 1. Stock development over time Figure 1 Cuckoo ray in Division 9.a. Left: ICES landings estimates (all fleets: 2002–2019) and discards (Spanish fleet: 2015– 2019). Right: The stock-size indicator (solid line) is the combined biomass survey index (normalized) from the two Spanish groundfish surveys in the Gulf of Cadiz (SpGFS-GC-WIBTS-Q1, SpGFS–GC-WIBTS-Q4). Horizontal lines indicate the mean stock-size indicator values for 2013–2017 and 2018–2019. Stock and exploitation status Table 1 Cuckoo ray in Division 9.a. State of the stock and the fishery relative to reference points. Catch scenarios The precautionary buffer was last applied in 2014. The status of the stock size and fishing pressure relative to reference points is unknown. However, because of a long-term increase in the stock-size indicator since 1998 and a significant decrease in the fishing effort over the last ten years, the precautionary buffer was not applied in 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Adult Chondrogenesis and Spontaneous Cartilage Repair in the Skate, Leucoraja Erinacea Aleksandra Marconi1, Amy Hancock-Ronemus2,3, J Andrew Gillis1,3*
    RESEARCH ARTICLE Adult chondrogenesis and spontaneous cartilage repair in the skate, Leucoraja erinacea Aleksandra Marconi1, Amy Hancock-Ronemus2,3, J Andrew Gillis1,3* 1Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom; 2Charles River Laboratories, Wilmington, Massachusetts, United States; 3Marine Biological Laboratory, Woods Hole, Massachusetts, United States Abstract Mammalian articular cartilage is an avascular tissue with poor capacity for spontaneous repair. Here, we show that embryonic development of cartilage in the skate (Leucoraja erinacea) mirrors that of mammals, with developing chondrocytes co-expressing genes encoding the transcription factors Sox5, Sox6 and Sox9. However, in skate, transcriptional features of developing cartilage persist into adulthood, both in peripheral chondrocytes and in cells of the fibrous perichondrium that ensheaths the skeleton. Using pulse-chase label retention experiments and multiplexed in situ hybridization, we identify a population of cycling Sox5/6/9+ perichondral progenitor cells that generate new cartilage during adult growth, and we show that persistence of chondrogenesis in adult skates correlates with ability to spontaneously repair cartilage injuries. Skates therefore offer a unique model for adult chondrogenesis and cartilage repair and may serve as inspiration for novel cell-based therapies for skeletal pathologies, such as osteoarthritis. Introduction Hyaline cartilage is a skeletal tissue that consists of a single cell type (the chondrocyte) embedded *For correspondence: [email protected] within a homogeneous, collagenous extracellular matrix (reviewed in Gillis, 2018). In mammals, hya- line cartilage is predominantly an embryonic tissue, making up the anlage of the axial (chondrocra- Competing interests: The nial, vertebral and rib) and appendicular (limb) endoskeleton. The vast majority of mammalian authors declare that no hyaline cartilage is replaced by bone during the process of endochondral ossification, with cartilage competing interests exist.
    [Show full text]
  • Leucoraja Naevus from Portuguese Continental Waters
    Universidade do Algarve Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Reproductive biology of the species Leucoraja naevus from Portuguese continental waters Catarina Maia Master thesis submitted for the partial fulfillment of the title of Master of Marine Biology 2010 Universidade do Algarve Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia Reproductive biology of the species Leucoraja naevus from Portuguese continental waters Catarina Maia Master thesis submitted for the partial fulfillment of the title of Master of Marine Biology Internal supervisor: Prof. Dr. Karim Erzini External supervisor: Profa. Dra. Ivone Figueiredo 2010 Acknowledgements I would like to thank everyone who helped me in IPIMAR and University: First I would like to thank Dr. Ivone Figueiredo and Dr. Karim Erzini for the opportunity to perform this work and the availability and encouragement shown over the same; I would also like to express my immense gratitude to Dr. Barbara Serra-Pereira for the help, encouragement and support (tireless!!!!) that greatly facilitated my work; My sincere thanks to José do Lago and Neide Lagarto for their help in sampling and friendship; As Teresa, Ana Rita and Inês, Miguel and Nuno, who not only gave me the motivation but also by the availability and friendship shown. I also thank to all IPIMAR workers, including Carmo and Cristrina for their help and suggestions in histology; Tanks to PNAB that partially supported my work; My eternal gratitude to my parents and Francisco who were always by my side and supported me unconditionally. Abstract Skate populations tend to be highly vulnerable to exploitation as a result of the main life history characteristics (slow growth, late maturity and low fecundity).
    [Show full text]
  • Species Amblyraja Georgiana
    FAMILY Rajidae Blainville, 1816 - skates [=Plagiostomia, Platosomia, Raia, Platysomi, Batides, Ablyraja, Cephaleutherinae, Amblyrajini, Riorajini, Rostrorajini] GENUS Amblyraja Malm, 1877 - skates Species Amblyraja doellojuradoi (Pozzi, 1935) - Southern thorny skate Species Amblyraja frerichsi (Krefft, 1968) - thickbody skate Species Amblyraja georgiana (Norman, 1938) - Antarctic starry skate Species Amblyraja hyperborea (Collett, 1879) - arctic skate [=badia, borea, robertsi] Species Amblyraja jenseni (Bigelow & Schroeder, 1950) - Jensen's skate Species Amblyraja radiata (Donovan, 1808) - thorny skate [=americana, scabrata] Species Amblyraja reversa (Lloyd, 1906) - reversed skate Species Amblyraja taaf (Meisner, 1987) - whiteleg skate GENUS Beringraja Ishihara et al., 2012 - skates Species Beringraja binoculata (Girard, 1855) - big skate [=cooperi] Species Beringraja cortezensis (McEachran & Miyake, 1988) - Cortez' ray Species Beringraja inornata (Jordan & Gilbert, 1881) - California ray [=inermis, jordani] Species Beringraja pulchra (Lui, 1932) - mottled skate Species Beringraja rhina (Jordan & Gilbert, 1880) - longnose skate Species Beringraja stellulata (Jordan & Gilbert, 1880) - starry skate GENUS Breviraja Bigelow & Schroeder, 1948 - skates Species Breviraja claramaculata McEachran & Matheson, 1985 - brightspot skate Species Breviraja colesi Bigelow & Schroeder, 1948 - lightnose skate Species Breviraja mouldi McEachran & Matheson, 1995 - blacknose skate [=schroederi] Species Breviraja nigriventralis McEachran & Matheson, 1985 - blackbelly
    [Show full text]
  • Delaware's Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need
    CHAPTER 1 DELAWARE’S WILDLIFE SPECIES OF GREATEST CONSERVATION NEED CHAPTER 1: Delaware’s Wildlife Species of Greatest Conservation Need Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 7 Regional Context ........................................................................................................................................... 7 Delaware’s Animal Biodiversity .................................................................................................................... 10 State of Knowledge of Delaware’s Species ................................................................................................... 10 Delaware’s Wildlife and SGCN - presented by Taxonomic Group .................................................................. 11 Delaware’s 2015 SGCN Status Rank Tier Definitions................................................................................. 12 TIER 1 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 2 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 TIER 3 .................................................................................................................................................... 13 Mammals ....................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Longnose Skates Zearaja Chilensisand Dipturus Trachyderma (Rajiformes: Rajidae)
    Univ. Sci. 2015, Vol. 20 (3): 321-359 doi: 10.11144/Javeriana.SC20-3.arol Freely available on line REVIEW ARTICLE A review of longnose skates Zearaja chilensis and Dipturus trachyderma (Rajiformes: Rajidae) Carolina Vargas-Caro1 , Carlos Bustamante1, Julio Lamilla2 , Michael B. Bennett1 Abstract Longnose skates may have a high intrinsic vulnerability among fishes due to their large body size, slow growth rates and relatively low fecundity, and their exploitation as fisheries target-species places their populations under considerable pressure. These skates are found circumglobally in subtropical and temperate coastal waters. Although longnose skates have been recorded for over 150 years in South America, the ability to assess the status of these species is still compromised by critical knowledge gaps. Based on a review of 185 publications, a comparative synthesis of the biology and ecology was conducted on two commercially important elasmobranchs in South American waters, the yellownose skate Zearaja chilensis and the roughskin skate Dipturus trachyderma; in order to examine and compare their taxonomy, distribution, fisheries, feeding habitats, reproduction, growth and longevity. There has been a marked increase in the number of published studies for both species since 2000, and especially after 2005, although some research topics remain poorly understood. Considering the external morphological similarities of longnose skates, especially when juvenile, and the potential niche overlap in both, depth and latitude it is recommended that reproductive seasonality, connectivity and population structure be assessed to ensure their long-term sustainability. Keywords: conservation biology; fishery; roughskin skate; South America; yellownose skate Introduction Edited by Juan Carlos Salcedo-Reyes & Andrés Felipe Navia Global threats to sharks, skates and rays have been 1.
    [Show full text]
  • The Conservation Status of North American, Central American, and Caribbean Chondrichthyans the Conservation Status Of
    The Conservation Status of North American, Central American, and Caribbean Chondrichthyans The Conservation Status of Edited by The Conservation Status of North American, Central and Caribbean Chondrichthyans North American, Central American, Peter M. Kyne, John K. Carlson, David A. Ebert, Sonja V. Fordham, Joseph J. Bizzarro, Rachel T. Graham, David W. Kulka, Emily E. Tewes, Lucy R. Harrison and Nicholas K. Dulvy L.R. Harrison and N.K. Dulvy E.E. Tewes, Kulka, D.W. Graham, R.T. Bizzarro, J.J. Fordham, Ebert, S.V. Carlson, D.A. J.K. Kyne, P.M. Edited by and Caribbean Chondrichthyans Executive Summary This report from the IUCN Shark Specialist Group includes the first compilation of conservation status assessments for the 282 chondrichthyan species (sharks, rays, and chimaeras) recorded from North American, Central American, and Caribbean waters. The status and needs of those species assessed against the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species criteria as threatened (Critically Endangered, Endangered, and Vulnerable) are highlighted. An overview of regional issues and a discussion of current and future management measures are also presented. A primary aim of the report is to inform the development of chondrichthyan research, conservation, and management priorities for the North American, Central American, and Caribbean region. Results show that 13.5% of chondrichthyans occurring in the region qualify for one of the three threatened categories. These species face an extremely high risk of extinction in the wild (Critically Endangered; 1.4%), a very high risk of extinction in the wild (Endangered; 1.8%), or a high risk of extinction in the wild (Vulnerable; 10.3%).
    [Show full text]
  • Starry Skate Amblyraja Radiata
    Starry Skate Amblyraja radiata Dorsal View (♀) Ventral View (♀) COMMON NAMES APPEARANCE Starry Skate, Starry Ray, Thorny Skate, Maiden Ray, Miller Ray, Raie • Maximum total length ~90cm. Radiee (Fr), Raya Radiante (Es). • Dorsal surface brown and covered in dark spots. • Sometimes one white spot beside each eye. SYNONYMS • Ventral surface white, occasionally with dark blotches. NE ATL Raia americana (DeKay, 1842), Raia scabrata (Garman, 1913), Raja • Row of 13-17 thorns along midline to first dorsal fin. radiata (Müller & Henle, 1841), Deltaraia radiata (Leigh-Sharpe, 1924). • Maximum of 10 of these on tail (measured from cloaca). • Thorns have star shaped bases. DISTRIBUTION Found in the east Atlantic from the The Starry Skate has a short, blunt snout and rounded pectoral fin English Channel tips. The dorsal fins can be joined at the bases or slightly separate. as far north as There is occasionally a single thorn between them if seperate Svalbarg and (Whitehead et al., 1986). The leading edge of the disc is concave in across to Iceland. females and juveniles, more undulate in males (Stehmann and Bürkel, In the west Atlantic 2000). it is found from There is a row of 13-17 large thorns along the midline of the back South Carolina from the head to the first dorsal fin and smaller thornlets scattered as far north as all over the upper surface of the disc and tail. These thorns have Canada and star shaped bases giving the species its common name. The ventral Greenland (Kittle, surface of the disc is smooth except for some prickles on the snout LC Unknown).
    [Show full text]
  • Molecular Taxonomy and Diversification of Atlantic Skates
    life Article Molecular Taxonomy and Diversification of Atlantic Skates (Chondrichthyes, Rajiformes): Adding More Pieces to the Puzzle of Their Evolutionary History Valentina Crobe 1,*,† , Alice Ferrari 1,† , Robert Hanner 2 , Robin W. Leslie 3,4, Dirk Steinke 5, Fausto Tinti 1,* and Alessia Cariani 1 1 Department of Biological, Geological and Environmental Sciences, University of Bologna, 240126 Bologna, Italy; [email protected] (A.F.); [email protected] (A.C.) 2 Department of Integrative Biology, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada; [email protected] 3 Department of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (DAFF), Branch Fisheries Management, Cape Town 8018, South Africa; [email protected] 4 Department of Ichthyology and Fisheries Science (DIFS), Rhodes University, Grahamstown 6139, South Africa 5 Department of Integrative Biology, Centre for Biodiversity Genomics, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON N1G 2W1, Canada; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] (V.C.); [email protected] (F.T.) † These authors contributed equally to this work. Abstract: Conservation and long-term management plans of marine species need to be based upon the universally recognized key-feature of species identity. This important assignment is particularly Citation: Crobe, V.; Ferrari, A.; challenging in skates (Rajiformes) in which the phenotypic similarity between some taxa and the Hanner, R.; Leslie, R.W.; Steinke, D.; individual variability in others, hampers accurate species identification. Here, 432 individual skate Tinti, F.; Cariani, A. Molecular samples collected from four major ocean areas of the Atlantic were barcoded and taxonomically Taxonomy and Diversification of analysed. A BOLD project ELASMO ATL was implemented with the aim of establishing a new fully Atlantic Skates (Chondrichthyes, available and well curated barcode library containing both biological and molecular information.
    [Show full text]
  • Cuckoo Ray Leucoraja Naevus
    Cuckoo Ray Leucoraja naevus Ventral View (♀) Dorsal View (♀) COMMON NAMES APPEARANCE Cuckoo Ray, Cuckoo Skate, Pudding, Stars, Crownback, Butterfly • Up to 75cm total length. Skate, Sandy Ray, Grootoogrog (Ne), Raie Fleurie (Fr), Kuckucksroche • Light grey/brown dorsal surface. (De), Razza Cucolo (It), Raya Santiguesa (Es). • Large yellow and black eyespot on each pectoral fin. SYNONYMS • Ventral surface white. Raja naevus (Duméril, 1865), Raja circularis (Couch, 1838) Deltaraia • Four rows of thorns on tail, inner two continue onto back. NE MED ATL naevus (Leigh-Sharpe, 1924) Raja quadrimaculata (Risso, 1826). The Cuckoo Ray is easily identified by the black eye-spot that is DISTRIBUTION present on each pectoral fin. These are large and marbled with yellow Found along stripes making them extremely distinctive. The rest of the dorsal coastlines surface of the disc is light grey to brown and the ventral surface throughout much is white. There are rarely smaller, less distinct eyespots in addition of the northeast (Whitehead et al., 1986). Atlantic and The dorsal surface of the disc is covered in small spines with the Mediterranean exception of the centre of the pectoral fins which are bare in adults. including northern The ventral surface is smooth except for the prickly leading edges Morocco, the British of the wings (Luna, 2009). Generally there are 9-13 thorns in a row Isles and southern around the inner margin of the eyes and a large triangle of thorns on Norway (Gibson the shoulder. Along the tail there are two rows of thorns on each side et al., 2006). In the of the midline, the inner of which continues onto the back in adults Mediterranean its NT (Whitehead et al., 1986).
    [Show full text]