Virtual Strasbourg 2021

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Virtual Strasbourg 2021 THE BRITISH CHAMBER | EU & BRUSSELS PRESENTS: VIRTUAL STRASBOURG 2021 KINDLY SPONSORED BY: VIRTUAL STRASBOURG 2021 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY On the 9th and 10th of March 2021, BritCham had the pleasure of hosting our first Virtual Strasbourg event. The event brought participants from a range of business and governmental spheres together and provided the opportunity to hear speakers from the EPP, S&D, RE, Green/EFA, GUE/NGL and ID groups in the European Parliament. These speakers brought a diverse range of perspectives and represented a variety of EU regions including Malta, Italy, Germany, Spain, Czechia, France, Portugal, Finland, Denmark and Croatia. Across three main events and multiple breakout rooms, the following subjects were discussed in a range of capacities and from the perspectives of various committees. The EU’s Digital Agenda is at the forefront of both business and government actors’ priorities and this was seen throughout Virtual Strasbourg. Topics included the EU’s Digital Future, improving digital infrastructure, building a digital curriculum, platform regulation, GDPR, cybersecurity and digital services. The EU is aiming to establish a new gold standard in digital regulations whilst also realizing the potential of the digital single market. By applying legislation such as the Digital Markets Act, Digital Services Act and Data Governance Act, the EU hopes to uphold the rights of consumers whilst enabling the digital and tech industry to develop under the clarity of regulation. Another key topic of discussion was the EU’s sustainable agenda and how it fits into the global sustainability strategy. It was suggested that transparency of materials used by green projects should be encouraged, so that green initiatives are as sustainable as possible. An example of this being the use of traceability programs, which can work to ensure responsible and resilient supply chains. Furthermore, it is believed that chemical regulation is not keeping pace with the wider policy agenda. This is at odds with the handling and recycling of materials and indicates a requirement for the harmonization of legislation. Addressing issues such as these is vital if the EU's green transition is to be successful. Regarding consumer protection, a Sustainable Product Index was suggested as a mechanism to better inform consumers of the environmental performance of a product. Furthermore, revised management of fake news, mechanisms for users to flag harmful content and platforms to work through codes of conduct were also discussed. The Transport Committee also plays a major role in the EU's green transition with the Smart and Sustainable Mobility Strategy. Despite the benefits of green hydrogen, it is expected that it will be a niche technology in cars due to their already widespread electrification. However, hydrogen will play an important role in other modes of transport, especially heavier vehicles, and may become a more viable option as the industry evolves. These technologies will play an important role in the decarbonization of the whole sector. The role and actions of the ECON Committee were also discussed. The committee has used the Recovery and Resilience Facility, the escape clause, and the pausing of fiscal rules, to mitigate the risk of Covid and to aid the recovery of member states. Despite this, we can expect countries to emerge from the pandemic with high deficits, large amounts of debt and weak economies. In some cases, debt could be greater than 100% of GDP. This will undoubtedly re-align member states concerns and tax may fall into focus. Matters such as reducing the VAT gap is high on the agenda of the ECON Committee, as well as competition policy, decarbonising the economy and the digital markets act. Whilst discussing the UK-EU relationship, the topics of the Northern Ireland Protocol, free movement, civil justice and access to courts for consumers, UK access to the Lugano convention, and data sharing were covered. It was stated that the TCA is fair and balanced and that it sets an institutional framework that can account for divergences. VIRTUAL STRASBOURG 2021 SPEAKERS: ·Axel Voss - Rapporteur on GDPR, copyright in DSM, ePrivacy Regulation, civil liability regime, Member of JURI and AIDA (DE, EPP) ·Luděk Niedermayer - Vice-Chair of the ECON Committee (CZ, EPP) ·Markus Ferber - Vice-Chair of FISC, member of ECON (DE, EPP) ·David McAllister - Chair of AFET and UKCG (DE, EPP) ·Tomislav Sokol - Member of IMCO (HR, EPP) ·Alex Agius-Saliba - Rapporteur on DSA, right to disconnect, Member of IMCO (MT, S&D) ·Ibán Garcia Del Blanco - Rapporteur on the framework of ethical aspects of artificial intelligence, robotics and related technologies, Vice-Chair of JURI and Member of AIDA (ES, S&D) ·Carlos Zorrinho - Member of ITRE (PT, S&D) ·Damian Boeselager - Shadow rapporteur on European Strategy for Data (DE, Greens/EFA) ·Marcel Kolaja - Vice-President of the EP responsible for Informatics and Telecommunications, Vice-Chair WG on ICT Innovation Strategy (CZ, Greens/EFA) ·Ville Niinistö - Shadow rapporteur on a comprehensive European approach to energy storage, Member of ENVI and ITRE (FI, Greens/EFA) ·Patrick Breyer - Shadow rapporteur on shaping the digital future of Europe (DE, Greens/EFA) ·Gwendoline Delbos-Corfield - Vice-Chair of Green/EFA Group, Substitute member of UKCG (FR, Green/EFA) ·Sandro Gozi - Member of IMCO (FR, RE) ·Jan-Christoph Oetjen - Vice-Chair of TRAN (DE, RE) ·Morten Petersen - Vice-Chair of ITRE, Member of UKCG (DK, RE) ·Sylvia Limmer - Shadow rapporteur on New Circular Economy Action Plan, Member of ENVI (DE, ID) ·Emmanuel Maurel - Member of INTA and AIDA (FR, GUE/NGL) VIRTUAL STRASBOURG 2021 THE EU DIGITAL AGENDA - 9TH MARCH On Tuesday the 9th of March, the Chamber was pleased to welcome MEPs Alex Aguius Saliba, Damian Boeselager, Ibán García, Marcel Kolaja, and Axel Voss to discuss the vital topic of the EU Digital Agenda. This session was moderated by Elizabeth Crossick, Head of Gov Relations at RELX, and kindly sponsored by Liberty Global. One of the key priorities mentioned by the panel was the European joint effort in developing a strategic focus for investing in the EU’s Digital Future. Improving the digital infrastructure in the European Union was seen as a top priority; whilst there was some debate on how fast the EU is currently acting on digital matters. There was also discussion on how to harmonise regulations on digital matters across the EU. Improving basic digital skills for European citizens was mentioned as a big issue – it was made clear that people should not be left behind due to lack of skills. The need for building a digital curriculum across Europe is vital. Furthermore, the funding for member states to promote digital skills is important to ensure that a huge portion of society is not left behind by the digitalisation of Europe. Digitalisation is becoming a key means of bringing people and business together, as well as a means of spreading information. It was mentioned that the EU should be more ambitious and open to legislate for the digital reality. With the huge boom we see with AI it’s a historic moment not only for Europe but globally, and we need to make sure that the rules for the upcoming age are fair, and that we can have European competition is the upcoming world. What is illegal offline should be illegal online – but tools should be put in place to put law enforcement in a position where this is possible. The need to improve safety, as well as the concerns of civil society in general, were raised during the discussion. The panel expressed their desire to ensure that benefits made by reforms in this area were felt across the EU. The current legal framework was created way before a number of these platforms which have become public utilities were created. These platforms have changed the very functioning of our global economy and created new challenges that need to be addressed. Subsequently, the DSA and DMA should guarantee a better, fairer digital environment. Regarding GDPR in the digital agenda, there was broad consensus that the EU should be working towards finding frameworks that have protection built in to enable individuals to have power over their own data. Many other topics were discussed over the period of the Q&A, such as access to digital services for SMEs, data protection, and cybersecurity. Innovations such as artificial intelligence were also discussed. VIRTUAL STRASBOURG 2021 THE EUROPEAN GREEN DEAL - 9TH MARCH During our session on The European Green Deal we heard from MEPs Markus Ferber, Ville Niinistö, Sylvia Limmer, and from our sponsor, the Cobalt Institute, on the efforts of the European Union to make our economy more sustainable, and how the presented challenges can be converted into opportunities. To give a backdrop to this discussion, it is important to note that in recent years there has been a huge shift in how investors are moving money to green sectors, which has created a totally different market setting and showing that making your company environmentally friendly is already a economically viable option. More than that, the costs of non-action are going to be a lot more expensive in the years to come with the majority of the European Parliament pushing for more green measures. Additionally, this green movement is global, as it needs to be in order to save the planet, and some examples of what countries around the world are doing include: The UK’s ambitious climate goals, it will be interesting to see how Brexit affects cooperation, but hopefully there will be continued focus in this area and the UK will remain a close ally to the EU. Globally, China is on the path to become climate neutral by 2060, and this is reflected in the Chinese economy with more investments being seen into green technology.
Recommended publications
  • Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue De La Loi 170 1000 Brussels
    Mr Josep Borrell Vice-President of the European Commission High Representative of the Union for the CFSP Rue de la Loi 170 1000 Brussels Brussels, 16th April 2021 Dear Mr. High Representative; Mr Vice-President of the Commission: A delegation from the illegitimate National Assembly of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, which emerged from the electoral farce organised on 6th December 2020 by the regime of Nicolás Maduro, recently paid a visit to Brussels and was officially received by the institution you lead. According to a statement you made on behalf of the European Union on 6th December, this spurious process took place in the absence of electoral conditions that could have guaranteed its credibility, without any respect for political pluralism, and in an atmosphere of persecution and disqualification of democratic leaders whose legitimate rights were curtailed. Your statement concludes that such circumstances could not consider this process credible, inclusive, and transparent and therefore the results did not represent the will of the Venezuelan people. That initial statement was confirmed on 6 January of this year by a new declaration, in similar terms to those expressed on 6 December, and by the conclusions of the Foreign Affairs Council of 25 January. These reiterated the lack of recognition of the electoral process and regretted the behaviour of the authorities of the Maduro regime, whose actions are preventing a solution to the serious crisis in Venezuela. We were surprised and gravely concerned to learn that on 14th April, at your request, senior officials of the European External Action Service received the aforementioned delegation, comprising Iris Varela, Pedro Carreño and Desirée Santos Amaral, at the EEAS headquarters.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament: 7Th February 2017 Redistribution of Political Balance
    POLICY PAPER European issues n°420 European Parliament: 7th February 2017 redistribution of political balance Charles de Marcilly François Frigot At the mid-term of the 8th legislature, the European Parliament, in office since the elections of May 2014, is implementing a traditional “distribution” of posts of responsibility. Article 19 of the internal regulation stipulates that the Chairs of the parliamentary committees, the Deputy-Chairs, as well as the questeurs, hold their mandates for a renewable 2 and a-half year period. Moreover, internal elections within the political groups have supported their Chairs, whilst we note that there has been some slight rebalancing in terms of the coordinators’ posts. Although Italian citizens draw specific attention with the two main candidates in the battle for the top post, we should note other appointments if we are to understand the careful balance between nationalities, political groups and individual experience of the European members of Parliament. A TUMULTUOUS PRESIDENTIAL provide collective impetus to potential hesitations on the part of the Member States. In spite of the victory of the European People’s Party (EPP) in the European elections, it supported Martin As a result the election of the new President of Schulz in July 2104 who stood for a second mandate as Parliament was a lively[1] affair: the EPP candidate – President of the Parliament. In all, with the support of the Antonio Tajani – and S&D Gianni Pittella were running Liberals (ADLE), Martin Schulz won 409 votes following neck and neck in the fourth round of the relative an agreement concluded by the “grand coalition” after majority of the votes cast[2].
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament 2019-2024
    European Parliament 2019-2024 Committee on Industry, Research and Energy ITRE_PV(2019)0925_1 MINUTES Meeting of 25 September 2019, 9.00-12.30 and 14.30-18.30 BRUSSELS 25 September 2019, 9.00 – 10.00 In camera 1. Coordinators’ meeting The Coordinators’ meeting was held from 9.00 to 10.00 in camera with Adina-Ioana Vălean (Chair) in the chair. (See Annex I) * * * The meeting opened at 10.04 on Wednesday, 25 September 2019, with Adina-Ioana Vălean (Chair) presiding. 2. Adoption of agenda The agenda was adopted. PV\1189744EN.docx PE641.355 EN United in diversityEN 3. Chair’s announcements Chair’s announcements concerning coordinators’ decisions of 3 September 2019. Chair has informed the Committee members that the Committee meeting of 7-8 October has been cancelled due to the Commissioner hearing. The next ITRE Committee meeting will take place on the 17 October 2019. 4. Approval of minutes of meetings 2-3 September 2019 PV – PE641.070v01-00 The minutes were approved. *** Electronic vote *** 5. Establishing the European Cybersecurity Industrial, Technology and Research Competence Centre and the Network of National Coordination Centres ITRE/9/01206 ***I 2018/0328(COD) COM(2018)0630 – C8-0404/2018 Rapporteur: Rasmus Andresen (Verts/ALE) Responsible: ITRE Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations The decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations was adopted: for: 49; against: 12; abstention: 2. (Due to technical issues, roll-call page is not available) 6. Labelling of tyres with respect to fuel efficiency and other essential parameters ITRE/9/01207 ***I 2018/0148(COD) COM(2018)0296 – C8-0190/2018 Rapporteur: Michał Boni Responsible: ITRE Vote on the decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations The decision to enter into interinstitutional negotiations was adopted: for: 56; against: 3; abstention: 4.
    [Show full text]
  • European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast
    Briefing May 2019 European Parliament Elections 2019 - Forecast Austria – 18 MEPs Staff lead: Nick Dornheim PARTIES (EP group) Freedom Party of Austria The Greens – The Green Austrian People’s Party (ÖVP) (EPP) Social Democratic Party of Austria NEOS – The New (FPÖ) (Salvini’s Alliance) – Alternative (Greens/EFA) – 6 seats (SPÖ) (S&D) - 5 seats Austria (ALDE) 1 seat 5 seats 1 seat 1. Othmar Karas* Andreas Schieder Harald Vilimsky* Werner Kogler Claudia Gamon 2. Karoline Edtstadler Evelyn Regner* Georg Mayer* Sarah Wiener Karin Feldinger 3. Angelika Winzig Günther Sidl Petra Steger Monika Vana* Stefan Windberger 4. Simone Schmiedtbauer Bettina Vollath Roman Haider Thomas Waitz* Stefan Zotti 5. Lukas Mandl* Hannes Heide Vesna Schuster Olga Voglauer Nini Tsiklauri 6. Wolfram Pirchner Julia Elisabeth Herr Elisabeth Dieringer-Granza Thomas Schobesberger Johannes Margreiter 7. Christian Sagartz Christian Alexander Dax Josef Graf Teresa Reiter 8. Barbara Thaler Stefanie Mösl Maximilian Kurz Isak Schneider 9. Christian Zoll Luca Peter Marco Kaiser Andrea Kerbleder Peter Berry 10. Claudia Wolf-Schöffmann Theresa Muigg Karin Berger Julia Reichenhauser NB 1: Only the parties reaching the 4% electoral threshold are mentioned in the table. Likely to be elected Unlikely to be elected or *: Incumbent Member of the NB 2: 18 seats are allocated to Austria, same as in the previous election. and/or take seat to take seat, if elected European Parliament ••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••••• www.eurocommerce.eu Belgium – 21 MEPs Staff lead: Stefania Moise PARTIES (EP group) DUTCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY FRENCH SPEAKING CONSITUENCY GERMAN SPEAKING CONSTITUENCY 1. Geert Bourgeois 1. Paul Magnette 1. Pascal Arimont* 2. Assita Kanko 2. Maria Arena* 2.
    [Show full text]
  • CDU/CSU Identität Und Demokratie GUE/NGL
    CDU/CSU Identität und Demokratie GUE/NGL Hildegard BENTELE (CDU) Christine ANDERSON Özlem DEMIREL Stefan BERGER (CDU) Gunnar BECK Cornelia ERNST Daniel CASPARY (CDU) Lars Patrick BERG Martina MICHELS Christian DOLESCHAL (CSU) Markus BUCHHEIT Martin SCHIRDEWAN Lena DÜPONT (CDU) Nicolaus FEST Helmut SCHOLZ Christian EHLER (CDU) Maximilian KRAH Markus FERBER (CSU) Joachim KUHS ECR-Fraktion Michael GAHLER (CDU) Sylvia LIMMER Helmut GEUKING Jens GIESEKE (CDU n.A. Jörg MEUTHEN Niclas HERBST (CDU) Guido REIL Fraktionslos Monika HOHLMEIER (CSU) Bernhard ZIMNIOK Martin BUSCHMANN Peter JAHR (CDU) Martin SONNEBORN Peter LIESE (CDU n.A. Grüne Norbert LINS (CDU Rasmus ANDRESEN SPD David McALLISTER (CDU) Michael BLOSS Katarina BARLEY Marlene MORTLER (CSU) Damian BOESELAGER Udo BULLMANN Angelika NIEBLER (CSU) Patrick BREYER Gabriele BISCHOFF Markus PIEPER (CDU) Reinhard BÜTIKOFER Delara BURKHARDT Dennis RADTKE (CDU) Anna CAVAZZINI Ismail ERTUG Christine SCHNEIDER (CDU) Anna DEPARNAY-GRUNENBERG Evelyne GEBHARDT Sven SCHULZE (CDU) Romeo FRANZ Jens GEIER Andreas SCHWAB (CDU) Daniel FREUND Petra KAMMEREVERT Ralf SEEKATZ (CDU Alexandra GEESE Dietmar KÖSTER Sven SIMON (CDU) Sven GIEGOLD Constanze KREHL Sabine VERHEYEN (CDU) Henrike HAHN Bernd LANGE Axel VOSS (CDU) Martin HÄUSLING Norbert NEUSER Marion WALSMANN (CDU) Pierrette HERZBERGER-FOFANA Maria NOICHL Manfred WEBER (CDU) Ska KELLER Joachim SCHUSTER Rainer WIELAND (CDU) Sergey LAGODINSKY Birgit SIPPEL Katrin LANGENSIEPEN Tiemo WÖLKEN Renew Europe Erik MARQUARDT Nicola BEER Hannah NEUMANN Engin EROGLU Niklas NIENASS Andreas GLÜCK Jutta PAULUS Svenja HAHN Terry REINTKE Moritz KÖRNER Manuela RIPA Ulrike MÜLLER Nico SEMSROTT Jan-Christoph OETJEN Viola VON CRAMON-TAUBADEL .
    [Show full text]
  • INFLUENCERS on BREXIT Who Is Most Influential on Brexit?
    INFLUENCERS ON BREXIT Who is most influential on Brexit? 1= 1= 3 4 5 Theresa MAY Angela MERKEL Nicola STURGEON Michel BARNIER Donald TUSK Chief Negotiator for the Prime Minister Federal Chancellor First Minister Commission Taskforce on Brexit President Negotiations UK Government German Government Scottish Government European Commission European Council 6 7 8 9 10 François HOLLANDE Philip HAMMOND David DAVIS Jean-Claude JUNCKER Guy VERHOFSTADT Secretary of State for Exiting the President Chancellor of the Exchequer President MEP & Lead rapporteur on Brexit European Union French Government UK Government UK Government European Commission European Parliament 11 12 13 14 15 Didier SEEUWS Enda KENNY Hilary BENN Mark RUTTE Martin SELMAYR Head of the General Secretariat of Chair, Committee on Exiting the Head of Cabinet of the President the Council Special Taskforce on Taoiseach European Union & Member of Prime Minister of the European Commission the UK Parliament, Labour Council of the EU Irish Government UK Parliament Dutch Government European Commission 16 17 18 19 20 Keir STARMER Donald TRUMP Wolfgang SCHÄUBLE Liam FOX Frans TIMMERMANS Secretary of State for Shadow Brexit Secretary US President-Elect Finance Minister First Vice-President Member of Parliament, Labour International Trade UK Parliament US Goverment German Government UK Government European Commission 21 22 23 24 25 Boris JOHNSON Nigel FARAGE Nick TIMOTHY Uwe CORSEPIUS Paul DACRE Joint Number 10 Special Adviser on Europe to Foreign Secretary MEP, Interim Leader of UKIP Chief-of-Staff,
    [Show full text]
  • Ihre Afd-Delegation Informiert Über Die Arbeit Im EU-Parlament
    Ihre AfD-Delegation informiert über die Arbeit im EU-Parlament Ausgabe #2 / September 2020 2 Liebe Leser, in den vergangenen Wochen ist in Brüssel trotz – oder gerade wegen? - der parlamentari- schen Sommerpause viel passiert. Mitten in der Urlaubszeit leitete die EU-Kommission ei- nen neuen Migrationspakt in die Wege. Um demokratischen Anschein zu wahren, konnten die Bürger auf einer gut versteckten Webseite der Kommission vier Wochen lang ihre Mei- nung hierzu kundtun. Davon machten bis vier Tage vor Einsendeschluss europaweit noch nicht einmal einhundert Menschen Gebrauch. Alles geschah weitestgehend unter Aus- schluss der Öffentlichkeit, bis wir auf diese Pläne aufmerksam wurden, eine kleine Kam- pagne starteten, und auch die anderen patriotischen Parteien hierfür sensibilisierten. In kürzester Zeit erreichten wir hunderttausende Menschen, knapp 2.000 überwiegend ablehnende Bürgerzuschriften gingen bei der Kommission ein – die Eurokraten haben nun viel Lesestoff. Was es mit dem neuen Migrationspakt auf sich hat, lesen Sie in dieser zwei- ten Ausgabe unseres „Blicks auf Brüssel“. Weitere Themen sind die Rede zur „Lage der Europäischen Union“ von Kommissionspräsi- dentin Ursula von der Leyen, die unser Delegationsleiter Prof. Dr. Jörg Meuthen ordentlich zerpflückt hat. Außerdem geht es um die Brandstiftungen in Moria, um Nord Stream 2, um Guido Reils neues Buch über Obdachlosigkeit und um vieles mehr. Wir wünschen Ihnen viel Lesevergnügen! Ihre AfD-Delegation im EU-Parlament 1 2 Jörg Meuthen ________________________________ 4 Maximilian
    [Show full text]
  • 12.5.2021 A9-0115/11 Amendment 11 Frances Fitzgerald, Maria Da Graça
    12.5.2021 A9-0115/11 Amendment 11 Frances Fitzgerald, Maria da Graça Carvalho, Deirdre Clune, Rosa Estaràs Ferragut, Hildegard Bentele, Vladimír Bilčík, Daniel Caspary, Pilar del Castillo Vera, Geoffroy Didier, Jarosław Duda, José Manuel Fernandes, Loucas Fourlas, José Manuel García-Margallo y Marfil, Esteban González Pons, Christophe Hansen, György Hölvényi, Brice Hortefeux, Danuta Maria Hübner, Rasa Juknevičienė, Sandra Kalniete, Seán Kelly, Arba Kokalari, Ewa Kopacz, Andrius Kubilius, Stelios Kympouropoulos, Leopoldo López Gil, Elżbieta Katarzyna Łukacijewska, Aušra Maldeikienė, Lukas Mandl, Liudas Mažylis, David McAllister, Francisco José Millán Mon, Nadine Morano, Marlene Mortler, Janina Ochojska, Markus Pieper, Jessica Polfjärd, Christian Sagartz, Simone Schmiedtbauer, Christine Schneider, Ralf Seekatz, Sara Skyttedal, Tomas Tobé, Eugen Tomac, Sabine Verheyen, Maria Walsh, Jörgen Warborn, Angelika Winzig, Isabel Wiseler-Lima, Javier Zarzalejos, Željana Zovko, Milan Zver, Gabriel Mato, Henna Virkkunen, Franc Bogovič, Andrzej Halicki, Michael Gahler, Marian-Jean Marinescu, Tom Berendsen, Peter Pollák, Siegfried Mureşan, Peter Liese, David Lega, Pernille Weiss, Tomasz Frankowski, Lena Düpont, Magdalena Adamowicz, Dennis Radtke, Tom Vandenkendelaere, Radosław Sikorski, Traian Băsescu, Stefan Berger, Michaela Šojdrová Report A9-0115/2021 Mónica Silvana González Impacts of climate change on vulnerable populations in developing countries (2020/2042(INI)) Motion for a resolution Paragraph 73 - introductory part Motion for a resolution Amendment
    [Show full text]
  • Special Report
    SPECIAL REPORT Key points for the 8th term of the European Parliament (2014-2019) Madrid, November 2014 BARCELONA BOGOTÁ BUENOS AIRES LIMA LISBOA MADRID MÉXICO PANAMÁ QUITO RIO J SÃO PAULO SANTIAGO STO DOMINGO KEY POINTS FOR THE 8TH TERM OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT (2014-2019) 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 1. THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT 2. THE LATEST ELECTION The European Parliament has, since its creation in 1962 in the 3. MAIN ISSUES IN THE context of the evolution of European integration, become the LEGISLATIVE AGENDA European Union (EU) Institution to have gained more power and 4. SPANISH DELEGATION relevance in the decision-making process of the Union. Indeed, over the years, it has gained increasingly important powers, legitimized 5. CONCLUSIONS and differentiated by the fact that it is the only EU Institution to be 6. APPENDIX 1: COMPETENCES elected by universal suffrage. 7. APPENDIX 2: CURRENT COMPOSITION OF THE It has evolved from being a mere advisory body to having the COMMITTEES power to co-legislate, together with the Council, in more than 85 legislative areas, exercising legislative powers as well as powers 8. APPENDIX 3: THE CURRENT of budgetary and political control. It also wields a considerable BUREAU OF THE EUROPEAN amount of political influence, and its competences include those PARLIAMENT of electing the President of the European Commission, vetoing the 9. APPENDIX 4: EUROPEAN appointment of the College, and even forcing the resignation of the PARLIAMENT DELEGATIONS entire Commission after a motion of no confidence. AUTHORS The official headquarters of the Parliament are in Strasbourg, where the main plenary sessions are held.
    [Show full text]
  • Electronic Democracy the World of Political Science— the Development of the Discipline
    Electronic Democracy The World of Political Science— The development of the discipline Book series edited by Michael Stein and John Trent Professors Michael B. Stein and John E. Trent are the co-editors of the book series “The World of Political Science”. The former is visiting professor of Political Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada and Emeritus Professor, McMaster University in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada. The latter is a Fellow in the Center of Governance of the University of Ottawa, in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, and a former professor in its Department of Political Science. Norbert Kersting (ed.) Electronic Democracy Barbara Budrich Publishers Opladen • Berlin • Toronto 2012 An electronic version of this book is freely available, thanks to the support of libraries working with Knowledge Unlatched. KU is a collaborative initiative designed to make high quality books Open Access for the public good. The Open Access ISBN for this book is 978-3-86649-546-3. More information about the initiative and links to the Open Access version can be found at www.knowledgeunlatched.org © 2012 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0. (CC- BY-SA 4.0) It permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you share under the same license, give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ © 2012 Dieses Werk ist beim Verlag Barbara Budrich GmbH erschienen und steht unter der Creative Commons Lizenz Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0): https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ Diese Lizenz erlaubt die Verbreitung, Speicherung, Vervielfältigung und Bearbeitung bei Verwendung der gleichen CC-BY-SA 4.0-Lizenz und unter Angabe der UrheberInnen, Rechte, Änderungen und verwendeten Lizenz.
    [Show full text]
  • Europa Stärken Heißt Deutschland Stärken! Deutschland Heißt Stärken Europa
    Europa stärken heißt Deutschland stärken! Deutschland heißt stärken Europa 1 2 Europa stärken heißt Deutschland stärken Die europäische Politik steht heute mehr denn je im Zentrum des öffentlichen Interesses in Deutschland. Die großen Herausforderungen unserer Zeit – die kriegeri- schen Konflikte in unseren Nachbarregionen, die Migra- tionsbewegungen und der Kampf gegen Islamismus und Terrorismus – lassen sich nicht mehr national lösen. Nur gemeinsam mit unseren europäischen Partnern können wir tragfähige Lösungen erarbeiten und die Errungenschaften der europäischen Einigung – Frieden, Freiheit, Sicherheit und wirtschaftlicher Wohlstand – erhalten. Das Auftreten populistischer, europafeindlicher Parteien und der von Großbritannien angestrebte Austritt aus der EU dürfen nicht darüber hinwegtäuschen, dass die überwältigende Mehrheit der Deutschen wie der Euro- päer von der Notwendigkeit der europäischen Einigung überzeugt ist. Dieses Vertrauen gilt es durch sachge- rechte politische Lösungen auf allen Ebenen zu stärken. Wir arbeiten daher nachhaltig für sichere EU-Außen- grenzen, eine dauerhafte Reduktion der Migrations- ströme nach Europa, eine stabile europäische Währung, solide Staatshaushalte, einen funktionierenden Binnen- markt, Wirtschaftswachstum und Arbeitsplätze, innere und äußere Sicherheit sowie die Bewahrung der Schöp- fung. All dies können wir nur gemeinsam mit unseren europäischen Partnern erreichen und dauerhaft sichern, im Interesse Deutschlands und Europas! Diese Broschüre bietet Ihnen einen Überblick über die Arbeit und
    [Show full text]
  • Question for Written Answer E-003824/2019/Rev.1 to the Commission Rule 138 Christine Anderson (ID), Charlie Weimers (ECR)
    Question for written answer E-003824/2019/rev.1 to the Commission Rule 138 Christine Anderson (ID), Charlie Weimers (ECR) Subject: Commission programme ‘Sport as a means of integration and social inclusion for migrants’ The Commission has set up a programme to promote, among other things, the ‘exchange of successful methods for integrating migrants’ through sporting activities. This encompasses various projects such as SFR-2287CF34 in Germany (EUR 240 000) and SFR-A72056BB in Italy (EUR 200 740). How many so-called migrants (broken down by age, gender, country of origin and project supported) are taking part in the programme? EUR 2 million have been set aside for the programme in the 2016-2018 funding period. What results are known to the Commission (with an indication of the survey and evaluation methods) in terms of successful integration? German football is seeing an increase in violent incidents. A whole team (BV Altenessen 06 II) was recently suspended after players and the coach attacked the referee. The names of players would indicate a migrant background (due to EU-data protection rules their names can not be published) Does the Commission programme include measures to prevent similar outbreaks of violence in sport from happening in the context of the projects? If no such measures have been put in place yet, how might the Commission support the Member States in the fight against acts of violence in sport carried out by migrants? Supporters1 1 This question is supported by Members other than the authors: Guido Reil (ID), Lars Patrick Berg (ID), Markus Buchheit (ID), Maximilian Krah (ID), Bernhard Zimniok (ID), Catherine Griset (ID), Gunnar Beck (ID), Sylvia Limmer (ID), Joachim Kuhs (ID), Nicolaus Fest (ID), Jörg Meuthen (ID) PE644.443v02-00.
    [Show full text]