<<

2007 American WJTA Conference and Expo August 19-21, 2007  Houston, Texas

Paper INVESTIGATION OF METAL PROCESSING

USING A HIGH SPEED LIQUID IMPACT V.Samardzic,E.S.Geskin,O.P.Petrenko NewJerseyInstituteofTechnology Newark,NewJersey,U.S.A.

G.A.Atanov,A.N.Semko,A.Kovaliov DonetskNationalUniversity, Donetsk,Ukraine ABSTRACT Metal deformation and welding in the course of an impact of high speed liquid (impulsivejets)wasinvestigatedexperimentally.Theprojectilesweregeneratedbyalauncher wherethechemicalofapowderwasconvertedintothekineticenergyofaand wereusedasapunch,whilethediegeometrydeterminedthefinalshapeofaworkpiece.The deformationandweldingofsteel,andbronzesampleswasinvestigatedexperimentally. Selectedsamplesunderwentforging,stampingandextrusionoperations.Itwasshownthatthe deformationwascarriedoutattheextremehighspeedandtheshapeofthediedeterminedthe geometryofageneratedpartatdesiredaccuracy.Joiningofsameanddissimilarmaterialsusing theliquidimpactwasalsostudied.Ultrasoundexaminationshowedthecontinuityifthejoint generated in the course of the impact. Potential application of the liquid impact for metals processingisdiscussed.

Organized and Sponsored by the WaterJet Technology Association 1. INTRODUCTION

Theobjectiveoftheproposedstudywastoinvestigateanovelhighproductivitytechnologyfor parts fabrication. The technology involves impacting a workpiece by high speed liquid projectiles.Thestressesdevelopedinatargetinthecourseoftheimpactexceedthestrengthof thetargetmaterialwhiletheforceexertedontheworkpiecedrivesthematerialintodiecavities. Compressionandrarefactionwavesdevelopedinthecourseoftheimpactbringaboutjoiningof similar and dissimilar materials subjected to impact. Thus room temperature forming and weldingofmetalsbecomepossible[18].Becausethedurationofdeformationorjoiningisequal toorlessthanthedurationoftheprojectileworkpieceinteraction,therateofthedeformationin thecourseoftheimpactbasedformingorweldingisextremelyhigh.Theeffectivenessofthe highratematerialprocessing,suchasexplosiveformingandwelding,iswellunderstoodand documented.[e.g.913].Whiletheeffectoftheliquidimpactonatargetissimilartothatofan explosive,asitwillbeshownbelow,insomeapplicationstheuseoftheliquidimpactismore effective.

The principal element of the technology in question is the high speed liquid projectiles. The theoryoftheprojectileformationandalauncherfortheirgenerationweredevelopedearlier[14 18].Thelauncherapplicationformetaldeformationwasdiscussedin[18].Thepresentedstudy isconcernedwiththefurtherinvestigationoftheimpactbasedforming.Theprincipalattention inthisstudy,however,ispaidtothedemonstrationofthefeasibilityoftheliquidimpactbased welding.

2. EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE

Anexperimentalsetupforthestudyoftheimpactbasedformingandweldingwasdesignedand constructed(Fig.1).Adetaildescriptionofthesetupisgivenin[8].Theprincipalpartofthis setupwasalaboratoryscalelauncherforprojectilegeneration.Inthecourseoftheexperiments the targets were mounted on a heavy pendulum (Fig.1). An angular displacement of the pendulum was measured and used for estimation of the projectile momentum. The standoff distance of the launcher changed in a wide range. Circular or square steel, copper and brass plateswereusedastargets.Theplates’thicknesswasintherangeof13mm.Inthecourseof formingexperimentsatargetwassupportedbyadie.Inthecourseofthestudyofjoiningspecial sampleholders(Figs.2,3)wasused.Thisholderenabledustotestjoiningofdifferentsetsof samplesatadifferentdistancebetweenthesamples.Particularly,joiningof attachedsamples wasinvestigated.Thisexperimentwasespeciallyimportant,becauseexplosiveweldingcanbe carriedoutatacertaindistancebetweenpartstobejoint.

Welding experiments were also carried out at different conditions of the water removal. Free wateroutflowfromtheimpactzoneaswellascomplete water containment were tested. The acquireddatawasusedtoevaluatethefeasibilityofindustrialuseofliquidimpactformingand welding.

3. INVESTIGATION OF MATERIAL FORMING

3.1 Formation of Sub Millimeter Scale Grooves . The experiments involved the study of formation of submillimeter circumferential ridges onthetargetsurface.Forthisstudy, adie withconcentricgroveswasdesignedandmanufactured(Fig.4).Inthecourseofexperimentsa metal plate was placed on a die and impacted by a projectile. The impact forced the target materialtofillthediegrooves.Thusasetofridgesandgroveswasformedonthetargetsurfaces. Compliancebetweenthegeometriesofthedieandworkpiecesurfacesconstitutedthecriterion forevaluationoftheperformedformingoperation. Inthecourseoftheexperiments200gof water was propelled by 30 g of at a standoff distance of 16 cm. The performed computationsshowedthatattheseconditionstheprojectileattheimpactwas1500m/s.

In order to quantify the accuracy of forming the microscopic evaluation of a workpiece was carried out using optical microscopy, 3D digital microscopy, and infinite focus microscopy. Optical microscopy (x200) was used for visual examination of the generated surfaces. The performed examination confirmed that at the existing tolerances of die fabrication there is sufficientcompliancebetweenthedesireddiegeometryandtheactualgeometryofaworkpiece.

The surface geometry generated in the course of an impact of a brass sample is shown in Figs.5–8.Acloseupviewofthesegmentcontainingthreeridges reproducedby3Ddigital microscopy (Fig. 5) confirms compliance of the shapes of the die and the workpiece The generatedworkpiecesurfacewasamirrorviewofthecorrespondingdiesection.Similarresult wasobtainedfor10differentsectionsoftheworkpiecesurface.

Ageneralviewofthesurfaceofabrasstargetgeneratedinthecourseofformingisshownin Fig.6.Asitfollowsfromthisfigurethegeometries of the die and the work piece complied sufficiently well and the geometries of the grooves and ridges on both surfaces are almost identical.Thisaccuratereproductionofthediegeometrywasobservedinallsections.Aninfinite focusmicroscopywasusedforquantificationoftheworkpiecesurfacetopography.Profilesof fourneighboringridgesformedonthebrasssurfaceareshowninFig.7.Asitisshowninthis picture, the height of a one of the depicted ridges was approximately 140 while the neighboringridgehasheightofapproximately200 .Thedifferenceinsizeoftheseridgeswas thesameasthatofthecorrespondingpartsofthedieandwascausedbyanunstableprocessof the die machining. The infinite focus microscopy was also used for analysis of the surface wavinessandroughnessofallgeneratedsamples.AsitfollowsfromFigs8aand8bthewaviness ofthegeneratedsurfaceswasbelow2 andtheroughnesswasbelow0.04 .

A generalviewofthe grovesandridges formedonthesurfaceofcoppersampleisshownin Fig.9.Noticethatthedesiredsurfacegeometrywasaccuratelyreproducedinthecourseofthe impact.Thiscomplianceisalsodemonstratedbyacloseupviewofasegmentcontainingthree ridgesandreproducedby3Ddigitalmicroscopy(Fig.10).Theinfinitefocusmicroscopywas usedtoexaminethetopographyandprofileofacoppersample.Itwasfoundthatthewavinessof thegeneratedsurfacewasbelow2 (Fig.11)androughnesswasbelow0.1 (Fig.12).

3.2 Fine Stamping. Theobjectiveoftheseexperimentswasthestudy of formation of rather complexpatternsonthetargetsurface.Inthiscaseaconventionalcoinwasusedasasupporting die.Targetmaterialsincludedcopper,brass,aluminumandhighductilitysteel.Thesteelhad 46%elongation,tensilestrengthof325MPa,andyieldstrengthof195MPa.Thicknessofthe copperandbrasssampleswas3mmandsteelsampleswere2.5mmthick.

AUkrainiancoinwasusedasadieforinvestigationofthefinestamping.Asaresultthecoin imagewasstamped intocopper,steelandaluminumplates.Inthecourseoftheexperiments350 gofwaterwerepropelledbycombustionof35gofpowderatastandoffdistanceof16cm. Acalculatedimpactvelocitywas850m/s.Geometryofthecoinwasaccuratelyreproducedon allaluminum,steelandcoppersamples.Qualityofthereproducedsurfacewascharacterizedby twomethods,infinitefocusmicroscopyand3Dprofileanalysis.Measurementofparametersof the surface geometry was performed and it was demonstrated that the coin geometry was reproducedsufficientlyaccurateonthesurfaceofalltargets

Generalviewofthecoinimagesstampedonthesurfaceof aluminumandcoppersamplesis showninFig.13.Animageofthecoinstampedonthesurfaceofasteelsampleandgenerated bythe3DprofileanalysisisshowninFig.14.Thedepthofthedepressionoftheworkpiece surfacewasapproximately130 .Asitwasdemonstratedbymeasurements,thiscorrespondsto thetopographyofthecoin.Inadditiontotheprofileanddepthfeatures,topviewofthework piece geometry was compared to the corresponding view of the die. The performed measurements showed almost mirrorlike reproduction of the die geometry on the workpiece surface. Example of a profile of the coin (Fig.15) shows fine stamped features with the maximumheightrangeof90 andtheroughnessbelow1 (Fig.16).

3.3. Discussion of results. The liquidimpactbased forming has unique technological advantages.Forexample,similarlytotheexplosiveforming[10,11],itrequiresasingledie.The seconddieisreplacedbyaliquidpunch.Thissimplifiestheformingfacilitiesandreducesits cost. A waterprojectile (liquidpunch) couldbe applied to several processing operations and rapidexecutionoftaskswouldenablemassproduction of various parts. All of the performed testsinvolveddeformationofvariousmetalsincludingsteelandaspecialatanextremely highratedeterminedbytheimpactofhighspeedwaterprojectiles.Thetestsincludedformation of rather complex patterns such as submillimeter scale grooves or an image of a coin. The facilitiesusedinthisstudy(launcher,dies,targets,fixture)werefabricatedusingconventional machineshopcapabilitiesandconventionalmaterials.Nospecialprovisionsforfasteningadie, target or launcher or preventing die deformation were available. In all of the performed experimentstheresultsofformingweresatisfactory.Thedesiredshapesweregenerated,surface topographyofthetargetswasquiteadequate,nodefectsordamagegeneratedinthecourseof deformationwasobserved.Formationofshapeshavingasizeof6micronswasachieved.

Itisexpectedthatthedevelopmentofmanufacturingtechnologywillinvolvemassproductionof the lowcost precision parts out of various engineering materials or formation of precision patternofthesurfacesofregularparts.Theperformed experimentsdemonstratefeasibilityofthe useofhighspeedprojectilesforfabricationofdesiredparts. It was shown that liquid impact driven fine forming has a potential of becoming technology of choice for precision parts fabrication. Indeed, the feasibility to generate precision parts with an adequate surface topography was demonstrated. The required facilities are comparatively simple and process productivity,determinedbythefiringrateofthelauncher,isextremelyhigh.Forsimplicitysake intheperformedexperimentsapowderwasusedasanenergysource.Itisexpectedthatinthe manufacturingenvironmentthechemicalenergyofapowderwillbereplacedbytheenergyof anelectricaldischargeormagneticfield.Inthiscasethefiringratecanbeashighas1kHz.Then itcanbeexpectedtoincreasethespeedoftheprojectilesupto23km/sandtheaccuracyandthe strength of the dies will be significantly enhanced. This will bring about emerging of a technologyformassproductionofcomplicatedandprecisionparts.

The performed experiments also indicate that there is a possibility to apply a proposed technology to precision forming of difficult to process materials, such as glass or ceramics. Unique advantages of the liquid impact based fine forming define the effectiveness of its application,whiletheperformedexperimentsshowitsfeasibility.

4. EXPERIMENTAL STUDY OF WELDING OF SIMILAR AND DISSIMILAR METALS

4.1 Experimental results

Initiallyexperimentswerecarriedoutattheprojectilespeedof1500m/s(Figs18,20,21).Initial examinationofasuccessfullyjoinedstructureshowed,however,thattheprojectileshavingspeed of750850m/sdeliverweldofhigherstrength(Fig.17).Thisrangeoflowerwaterspeedwas used in the further experiments. By repetition of experiments consistency of operation was confirmed.Afterinitialinvestigationitwasestimatedthatseparationofthepartstobejointed providesbetterconditionsforweldingthanjoiningwithoutseparation.Itwasalsofoundthatif thelauncherbarreliscompletelyfilledbywaterpriortotheprocessinitiation,astrongerjoint wasdeveloped.Consistencyofjoiningwasconfirmedbysufficientrepetitionofexperiments. Each of the performed tests resulted in welded assembly of investigated combinations. Some resultsoftheselectedexperimentsaregivenintheTable1.

Table 1. Experimentalresultsofweldingbywaterprojectileimpact

Exp.# Mp[g] Impulse[kgm/s]/* α[deg] MetalsCombination

12 25 314/*45.5 CopperNickelCopper

13 35 369.1/*54 BrassNickelBrass

28 30 169/*24 CopperCopper

43 30 430.81/*64 CopperSteel

Ultrasonictechniquewasemployedforexaminationand characterization of welded interface interfaceregion.Alljoinedsampleswerescannedautomaticallyandmetallurgicalbondingand integrityofalljoinedstructureswasconfirmed.Generalviewofbrassnickelalloybrasswelded sandwichinFig.17showssinglestructureintegratedoutofthreeplates.Allthreeplateswere welded and integrated into a single structure by the water projectile of velocity around 750m/sec.Suchweldedstructuresweregeneratedin each experiment. Example of ultrasonic scanofcoppernickelalloycopperweldedsandwichisshowninFig.18withtheultrasonicscan shown below. All joined samples were scanned automatically and metallurgical bonding and integrityofalljoinedstructureswasconfirmed. Sampleofultrasonicverificationofmetallurgicalbondingandintegrityofweldedcoppernickel alloycopper plates obtained during experiment shown in figure 19. The time differential of ultrasonicreflectionpeaksisthetimeneededforthesoundtotravelthroughentirethicknessof the structure with no interference caused by a poor joint. This confirms integrity and metallurgical bonding of plates. Two more examples of ultrasonic verification of the metallurgicalbondingareshowninfigures22and23.

4.2 Discussion of results

In this study a novel welding technology was investigated. Mechanical separation of several weldsrevealedevidenceofmeltedlayersineachoftheweldedsamples.Itappearsthatmelting ofextremelythinlayersattheinterfacetakesplaceandresultsinmetallurgicalweldingofjoined metals.Durationoftheprocessisoforderofmicrosecondsduringwhichmicrodiffusionmay takeplaceaswellandmaybeacontributingweldingmechanismaswell.

Outof20performedexperimentsonlyonewasnotsuccessful.Itwasshownthatprocessresultis determinedbythedistancebetweenthejoiningitems,momentumanddirectionoftheprojectile, kindandthicknessofthejoiningcomponents,durationoftheimpact.Theprocessvariablesin theperformedexperimentschangeinawiderange.Forexample,theprojectilesimpulseranged from 170 to 465 kgm/s. A number and range of the process variable enable us to optimize processresults.Becauseofthis,theliquidimpactweldingismoreeffectivetechnologythenthe explosivewelding[12,13].Whiletheexplosiveweldingcanbecarriedoutonlyataseparation ofthejoiningparts,thejoiningviatheliquidimpactcanbebroughtaboutwithoutandwiththe componentsseparation.Whilethebestresultsareachievedat90degreeimpact,theprocesscan becarriedoutattheinclinationoftheprojectiletrajectory.

It is suggested that the welding during the liquid impact is due to the superposition of the compression and rarefaction waves generated by the impacting projectiles. Propagation of the wavesthroughamultiphaseregioncausesmeltingofverythinlayersattheinterfaceofplatesto bejoined.Thisresultsinformingametallurgicalbondalongthephaseboundary.

5. CONCLUDING REMARKS

The feasibility of the material forming and welding using highspeed liquid projectiles was demonstrated.Itwasshownthatacomparativelysimpledevice,thepresentedlauncher,canbe usedforbothformingandjoining.Thesetworatherdifferentapplicationsareattainedjustby changeoftheprocessconditions.Thislaunchercapabilityconstitutestheprimaryadvantageof theproposedtechnology.

6. REFERENCES

1. Petrenko, O. P., Geskin, E. S., Atanov, G. A., Semko, A. N., Goldenberg, B. (2004). "Numerical Modeling of Formation of HighSpeed Water Slugs". Transactions of ASME, JournalofFluidsEngineering ,126(2). 2. V.Samardzic, E.S. Geskin ,G.A. Atanovv, A.N. Semko, A. Kovaliov,(June 2007). "Liquid Impact Based Material MicroForming Technology". Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance,16(3)

3.Geskin,E.S.,Goldenberg,B.,Petrenko,O.P.,V.Samardzic,Atanov,G.A.,Semko,A.N. (Jan. 2002). Investigation of Material Fracturing by HighSpeed Water Slugs. Presentation at Annual Meeting of National Science Foundation Division of Design Manufacturing and InnovatingEngineering .SanJuan,PuertoRico.

4.Geskin,E.S.,Goldenberg,B.,Petrenko,O.P.,V.Samardzic,Atanov,G.A.,Semko,A.N., (Jan 2003). Investigation of Material Fracturing by HighSpeed Water Slugs. Presentation at Annual Meeting of National Science Foundation Division of Design Manufacturing and InnovatingEngineering .Birmingham,AL.

5.Geskin,E.S.,Goldenberg,B.,Petrenko,O.P.,V.Samardzic,Atanov,G.A.,Semko,A.N. (Jan 2004). Investigation of Material Fracturing by HighSpeed Water Slugs. Presentation at Annual Meeting of National Science Foundation Division of Design Manufacturing and InnovatingEngineering ,Dallas,TX.

6. V.Samardzic, O.Petrenko, E.S.Geskin, G.A.Atanov, A.N.Semco “Innovative Jetbased MaterialProcessingTechnology”,2005WJTAAmerican Waterjet Conference&Exhibition, ST Louis,MO

7.V.Samardzic,Petrenko,T,Bitadze,E.S.Geskin,GA.Atanov,A.N.Semko,A.N.Kovaliov andO.A.Rusanova(2005)“FeasibilityStudyofFree Form Fabrication of the Heterogeneous Structures Using the Liquid Impact”, Proceedings of 2005 DMII NSF grantees conference, Scottsdale,AZ

8. V.Samardzic, O.P. Petrenko, E.S.Geskin G.A. Atanovv, A.N. Semko, A. Kovaliov, (2005) “InnovativeJetBasedMaterialProcessingTechnology”,inproceedingsof WaterjetTechnology AssociationConference,EditorM.Hashish,August,Houston,TX;paper2A2

9.M.D.Verson,(1969) ImpactMachining ,VersonAllsteelCompany

10..J.S.Reinhart.(1963), ExplosiveWorkingofMetals ,Macmillan.

11.A.V.Krutinet.al.(1975). ExlosionDeformationofMetals ,Metallurgia,Moscow(inRussian)

12.B.Crosssland,(1982)“ExplosiveWeldingofMetalsanditsApplication”, ClarendonPress, Oxford,OxfordUniversityPress,NY

13. T.Z. Blazinski , (1983) “Explosive Welding, Forming and Compaction”, Applied Science Publishers,LondonandNewYork

14.G.A., Atanov, (1987), Hydroimpulsive installations for rocks breaking . Kiev, Vystcha shkola.1987(inRussian.). 15.GAtanov.(1996),“TheImpulsiveWaterJetDevice:ANewMachineForBreakingRock“, InternationalJournalofWaterJetTechnolgy.Vol.1,No2,p..85–91

16,.W.C.CooleyandW.N. Lucke(1974),“DevelopmentandTestingofaWaterfor Tunneling”. Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Jet Cutting Technology. Cambridge,England,PaperJ3

17.B.VVoitsekhovsky,(.1967),“Jetnozzleforobtaininghighpulsedynamicpressureheads”, U.S.Patent№3,343,794 ,26Sept..

18 .G.A., Atanov, , V.I., Gubskiy, A.N., Semko, (1997) “Internal of the powder hydrocannon”,IzvestiaRAN ,MZhG,№6,.–Р.175179(inRussian).

7. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

ThesupportofNSF(AwardDMI9900247)andCRDF(UE22441DO02Q2)inperformingof this study is acknowledged. The state of the art instrumentation techniques was provided by EXCEL Technologies, Enfield, CT 06083; NDT Automation, Princeton Junction, NJ; ADE PhaseShift,Tuscon,AZ85706.

7. FIGURES

Figure 1. Schematicoftheexperimentalsetup.Noticethatmountingofthetargetona ballisticpendulumallowsmeasuringtheimpactmomentum. 1

3 2 4

4 4

Figure 2 . Schematicofnestedexperimentalsetupforwelding.1–waterprojectile,2–nested metalsamplestobewelded,3–fasteners,4–backsupport

Figure 3. Componentsofanestedexperimentalsetuppriortoassemblyforwelding. 1–backsupport,2–rearcopperplatetobewelded,3–middlelayertobewelded (nickelalloycoin),4–separationring,5–fastener,6–impactsidecopperplatetobe welded. 28.5mm

5 4 3 2 1

Figure 4 . Generalviewofthedieusedforfineforgingofsamples.Noticecomplexityofdie geometry.Numbers15shownumberofthesectiononthediesurface.Theridges geometryofdifferentsection(Table1)isdifferent.

Figure 5. Segmentofconcentricgroovesandridgesformedonbrass.Noticethatridgesand groovesoftheworkpiecesurfacehavetheformsofatrapeziumwhichissimilarto acorrespondingsegmentofthedie. 28.5m m Figure 6. Generalviewofconcentricgroovesandridgesformedonthesurfaceofbrasssample. Noticeprecisegeometryofthegeneratedgrooves. Figure 7. Theprofileofconcentricgroovesandridgesformedonabrasssample.

Figure 8a. Surfacewavinessofgroovesformedonabrasssample. Figure 8b. Surfaceroughnessofgrovesformedonabrasssample.

28.5mm

Figure 9. Generalviewofconcentricgroovesandridgesformedonthesurfaceofacopper sample. Figure 10. Segmentofconcentricgrovesandridgesformedonacoppersample

Figure11. Surfacewavinessofgrovesformedonacoppersample.

Figure12 .Surfaceroughnessofagroveformedonacoppersample. Figure 13. Generalviewofacoinstampedonaluminumandcoopersamples.Notice reproductionoffinedetailsofthecoinonthesamplesurface.

Figure 14. Imageofcoinstampedonsteelcreatedusing3Dprofileanalyzer.

Figure 15. Exampleofprofileofacoinstampedonasteelsample. Figure 16. Roughnessofthesurfaceofsteelsamplestampedbyacoin.

Figure 17. Generalviewofbrassnickelalloycoinbrassplatesweldedbythewaterprojectile impactinatthewatervelocity750m/sec(Table1,Exp.#13).

Figure 18. Copper–nickelalloycopperplatesweldedbythewaterprojectileimpactatthe watervelocity1500m/sec,andultrasonicscanofweldedplates.

Figure 19. Ultrasonicverificationofintegrityofformedstructureandmetallurgicalbondingof platesweldedinexperiment12(Table1). Figure 20. Copperandnickelalloyplatesweldedbythewaterprojectileimpactatthewater velocity1500m/sec.Micrographofwavyinterfaceofjoinedcoppernickelplates. a b Figure 21. a)Copperplatesweldedbythewaterprojectileimpactatthewatervelocity1500 m/secandh=3mm.b)Zoomedinsectionofmicrographofwavyinterfaceofjoined copperplates.

Figure 22. a)Ultrasonicscanofweldedstructureobtainedinexperiment13(Table1.).Brass coinbrasscombination.

Figure 23. a)Ultrasonicverificationofintegrityofformedstructureandmetallurgicalbonding ofplatesinexp.44.(Ta