DOCSLIB.ORG

Curlew National Grassland Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Curlew National Grassland Plan Caribou-Targhee NF Caribou-Targhee NF 1405 Hollipark Dr. Idaho Falls, ID 83401 (208) 557-5760 Curlew National Grassland Plan Caribou-Targhee National Forest Lead Agency: USDA-Forest Service Responsible Official: Jack Troyer, Acting Regional Forester USDA-Forest Service Intermountain Region 324 25th Street Ogden, Utah 84401 Telephone: (801) 625-5605 For further information, contact: Jerry B. Reese, Forest Supervisor Caribou-Targhee National Forest 1405 Hollipark Dr. Idaho Falls, Idaho 83401 Telephone: (208) 557-5760 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital and family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Person with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audio tape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 1400 Independence Ave., SW, Washington, D.C. 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Table of Contents CHAPTER 1: PURPOSE OF THE PLAN................................................................................1-1 Why are we developing a Grassland Plan?............................................................................1-1 What is the Legal Framework of the Grassland Plan?............................................................1-1 What Does the Grassland Plan Do?.......................................................................................1-2 Plant and Animal Diversity and Population Viability.............................................................1-3 Federal Tribal Trust Responsibilities.....................................................................................1-4 Adaptive Management ...........................................................................................................1-4 What Management Direction has been Considered?..............................................................1-4 How is this Grassland Plan Structured?.................................................................................1-6 CHAPTER 2: SUMMARY OF THE AMS...............................................................................2-1 CURRENT RESOURCE CONDITIONS AND TRENDS..........................................................................2-1 Unchanged Management Direction.......................................................................................2-1 OVERVIEW OF THE AMS FINDINGS FOR GRASSLAND RESOURCES ................................................2-2 General Conditions...............................................................................................................2-2 Riparian and Watersheds.......................................................................................................2-2 Vegetation.............................................................................................................................2-3 Wildlife..................................................................................................................................2-4 Human Uses and Values........................................................................................................2-6 Summary of Trends for the Grassland....................................................................................2-7 NEEDS FOR CHANGE...................................................................................................................2-8 Soil........................................................................................................................................2-8 Terrestrial Ecosystems...........................................................................................................2-8 Aquatic Ecosystems...............................................................................................................2-9 Inventory and Research Needs...............................................................................................2-9 ISSUES, CONCERNS AND OPPORTUNITIES...................................................................................2-10 Riparian and Watershed Management .................................................................................2-10 Vegetation and Wildlife Habitat Management......................................................................2-10 Social and Economic Factors..............................................................................................2-12 CHAPTER 3: GRASSLAND-WIDE GUIDANCE...................................................................3-1 DFC’S, GOALS, OBJECTIVES, STANDARDS AND GUIDELINES .......................................................3-1 ECOLOGICAL PROCESSES AND PATTERNS....................................................................................3-2 General Ecological Conditions..............................................................................................3-2 Insects And Disease...............................................................................................................3-3 Fire/Fuels..............................................................................................................................3-3 PHYSICAL ELEMENTS.................................................................................................................3-4 Soils......................................................................................................................................3-4 Air Quality............................................................................................................................3-5 Water Quality........................................................................................................................3-5 Lands ....................................................................................................................................3-6 Minerals And Geology...........................................................................................................3-7 BIOLOGICAL ELEMENTS .............................................................................................................3-8 Terrestrial Ecosystems--Vegetation........................................................................................3-8 Fisheries, Water, And Riparian Resources...........................................................................3-10 Terrestrial Ecosystems—Wildlife Habitat.............................................................................3-11 FOREST USE AND OCCUPATION.................................................................................................3-14 Tribal Coordination.............................................................................................................3-14 Roads, Trails And Access.....................................................................................................3-14 i Recreation ...........................................................................................................................3-15 Heritage Resources .............................................................................................................3-16 PRODUCTION OF COMMODITY RESOURCES ................................................................................3-18 Livestock Manag ement ........................................................................................................3-18 CHAPTER 4: SUBSECTION AND PRESCRIPTION AREAS..............................................4-1 ECOLOGICAL SUBSECTIONS........................................................................................................4-1 Humboldt River High Plateau Subsection (342Ba).................................................................4-1 Curlew Valley Lake Sediments Subsection (342Bb)................................................................4-2 MANAGEMENT PRESCRIPTIONS...................................................................................................4-4 Introduction...........................................................................................................................4-4 ô PRESCRIPTION 2.8.8 - RIPARIAN/WETLAND AREAS (RWA)....................................4-6 M PRESCRIPTION 3.4.1 - SPECIAL WILDLIFE AREAS................................................4-10 Q PRESCRIPTION 4.1.2 - DEVELOPED RECREATION SITES.....................................4-12 õ PRESCRIPTION 6.5 – RANGELAND VEGETATION and UPLAND BIRD HABITAT MANAGEMENT..................................................................................................................4-14 ” PRESCRIPTION 8.1.2 - CONCENTRATED DEVELOPMENT AREAS .......................4-18 CHAPTER 5: IMPLEMENTATION AND MONITORING...................................................5-1 IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY .....................................................................................................5-1 MONITORING STRATEGY ............................................................................................................5-3 Monitoring Activities .............................................................................................................5-3 Evaluation.............................................................................................................................5-3
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The First Record of Far Eastern Curlew (Numenius Madagascariensis) in British Columbia
    The First Record of Far Eastern Curlew (Numenius madagascariensis) in British Columbia. By Rick Toochin and Don Cecile. Submitted: April 15, 2018. Introduction and Distribution The Far Eastern Curlew (Numenius madagascariensis) is the largest migratory shorebird in the world. This species is found only along the East Asian–Australasian Flyway. The Far Eastern Curlew breeds on open mossy or transitional bogs, moss-lichen bogs and wet meadows, and on the swampy shores of small lakes in Siberia and Kamchatka in Russia, as well as in north-eastern Mongolia and China (Hayman et al. 1986, del Hoyo et al. 1996). The Yellow Sea of the Republic of Korea and China is a vitally important stopover site on migration. This species is also a common passage migrant in Japan and Indonesia, and is occasionally recorded moving through Thailand, Brunei, Bangladesh, Vietnam, Philippines, Malaysia and Singapore (O’Brien et al. 2006). During the winter a few birds occur in southern Republic of Korea, Japan, China, and Taiwan (Brazil 2009, EAAFP 2017). About 25% of the population is thought to winter in the Philippines, Indonesia and Papua New Guinea. Most birds, approximately 73% or 28,000 individuals, spend the winter in Australia, where birds are found primarily on the coast of all states, particularly the north, east and south-east regions including Tasmania (Bamford et al. 2008, BirdLife 2016). In the early 2000’s, the global population of the Far Eastern Curlew was estimated at 38,000 individuals (BirdLife 2016). Unfortunately due to the fact that the global population is declining, the true population size is likely to be much smaller, and may not exceed 20,000 individuals (BirdLife 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Curlew Valley Subbasin Assessment and Total Maximum Daily Loads
    Curlew Valley Subbasin Assessment and Total Maximum Daily Loads 2019 Hydrologic Unit Code 16020309 Final State of Idaho Department of Environmental Quality April 2019 Printed on recycled paper, DEQ April 2019, PID TM86, CA code 62074. Costs associated with this publication are available from the State of Idaho Department of Environmental Quality in accordance with Section 60-202, Idaho Code. Curlew Valley Subbasin Assessment and Total Maximum Daily Loads 2019 April 2019 Prepared by Hannah Harris Idaho Department of Environmental Quality Pocatello Regional Office 444 Hospital Way #300 Pocatello, ID 83201 (208) 236-6160 Curlew Valley Subbasin Assessment and TMDLs Table of Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iv List of Figures ................................................................................................................................. v Abbreviations, Acronyms, and Symbols ...................................................................................... vii Executive Summary ..................................................................................................................... viii Subbasin at a Glance .................................................................................................................. ix Key Findings ............................................................................................................................... x Public Participation .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List
    Draft Version Target Shorebird Species List The target species list (species to be surveyed) should not change over the course of the study, therefore determining the target species list is an important project design task. Because waterbirds, including shorebirds, can occur in very high numbers in a census area, it is often not possible to count all species without compromising the quality of the survey data. For the basic shorebird census program (protocol 1), we recommend counting all shorebirds (sub-Order Charadrii), all raptors (hawks, falcons, owls, etc.), Common Ravens, and American Crows. This list of species is available on our field data forms, which can be downloaded from this site, and as a drop-down list on our online data entry form. If a very rare species occurs on a shorebird area survey, the species will need to be submitted with good documentation as a narrative note with the survey data. Project goals that could preclude counting all species include surveys designed to search for color-marked birds or post- breeding season counts of age-classed bird to obtain age ratios for a species. When conducting a census, you should identify as many of the shorebirds as possible to species; sometimes, however, this is not possible. For example, dowitchers often cannot be separated under censuses conditions, and at a distance or under poor lighting, it may not be possible to distinguish some species such as small Calidris sandpipers. We have provided codes for species combinations that commonly are reported on censuses. Combined codes are still species-specific and you should use the code that provides as much information as possible about the potential species combination you designate.
    [Show full text]
  • Growth and Development of Long-Billed Curlew Chicks
    April 1973] General Notes 435 Pitelka and Donald L. Beaver critically read the manuscript. This work was con- ducted under the I.B.P. Analysis of Ecosystems-TundraProgram and supported by a grant to F. A. Pitelka from the National ScienceFoundation.--THo•rAs W. CUSTrR, Department o! Zoology and Museum o! Vertebrate Zoology, University o! California, Berkeley,California 94720. Accepted9 May 72. Growth and development of Long-billed Curlew chicks.--Compared with the altricial nestlings of passerinesand the semiprecocialyoung of gulls, few studies of the growth and developmentof the precocialchicks of the Charadrii have been made (Pettingill, 1970: 378). In Europe, yon Frisch (1958, 1959) describedthe develop- ment of behavior in 14 plovers and sandpipers. Davis (1943) and Nice (1962) have reported on the growth of Killdeer (Charadriusvociferus), Nice (1962) on the Spotted Sandpiper (Actiris macularia), and Webster (1942) on the growth and development of plumages in the Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani). Pettingill (1936) studiedthe atypical AmericanWoodcock (Philohelaminor). Among the curlews, Genus Numenius, only the Eurasian Curlew (N. arquata) has been studied (von Frisch, 1956). Becauseof the scant knowledgeabout the development of the youngin the Charadriiand the scarcityof informationon all aspectsof the breeding biology of the Long-billed Curlew (N. americanus) (Palmer, 1967), I believe that the following data on the growth and development of Long-billed Curlew chicks are relevant. I took four eggs,one being pipped, from a nest 10 miles west of Brigham City, Box Elder County, Utah, on 24 May 1966. One egg was preservedimmediately for additional study, the others I placed in a 4' X 3' X 2' cardboard box with a 60-watt lamp for warmth in a vacant room in my home until they hatched.
    [Show full text]
  • List of Shorebird Profiles
    List of Shorebird Profiles Pacific Central Atlantic Species Page Flyway Flyway Flyway American Oystercatcher (Haematopus palliatus) •513 American Avocet (Recurvirostra americana) •••499 Black-bellied Plover (Pluvialis squatarola) •488 Black-necked Stilt (Himantopus mexicanus) •••501 Black Oystercatcher (Haematopus bachmani)•490 Buff-breasted Sandpiper (Tryngites subruficollis) •511 Dowitcher (Limnodromus spp.)•••485 Dunlin (Calidris alpina)•••483 Hudsonian Godwit (Limosa haemestica)••475 Killdeer (Charadrius vociferus)•••492 Long-billed Curlew (Numenius americanus) ••503 Marbled Godwit (Limosa fedoa)••505 Pacific Golden-Plover (Pluvialis fulva) •497 Red Knot (Calidris canutus rufa)••473 Ruddy Turnstone (Arenaria interpres)•••479 Sanderling (Calidris alba)•••477 Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus)••494 Spotted Sandpiper (Actitis macularia)•••507 Upland Sandpiper (Bartramia longicauda)•509 Western Sandpiper (Calidris mauri) •••481 Wilson’s Phalarope (Phalaropus tricolor) ••515 All illustrations in these profiles are copyrighted © George C. West, and used with permission. To view his work go to http://www.birchwoodstudio.com. S H O R E B I R D S M 472 I Explore the World with Shorebirds! S A T R ER G S RO CHOOLS P Red Knot (Calidris canutus) Description The Red Knot is a chunky, medium sized shorebird that measures about 10 inches from bill to tail. When in its breeding plumage, the edges of its head and the underside of its neck and belly are orangish. The bird’s upper body is streaked a dark brown. It has a brownish gray tail and yellow green legs and feet. In the winter, the Red Knot carries a plain, grayish plumage that has very few distinctive features. Call Its call is a low, two-note whistle that sometimes includes a churring “knot” sound that is what inspired its name.
    [Show full text]
  • Long-Billed Curlew ASSESSING HABITAT QUALITY for PRIORITY WILDLIFE SPECIES in COLORADO WETLANDS
    COLORADO PARKS & WILDLIFE Long-billed Curlew ASSESSING HABITAT QUALITY FOR PRIORITY WILDLIFE SPECIES IN COLORADO WETLANDS Species Distribution Range Long-billed curlews breed in the western United States, including eastern Colorado, and in southwestern Canada. During migration, long-billed curlews occur sporadically in western Colorado and regularly throughout eastern Colorado. © “MIKE” MICHAEL L. BAIRD BAIRD L. MICHAEL “MIKE” © Long-billed curlews (Numenius americanus, Family Scolopacidae) have a distinctive long bill that curves downward. They are can be found near playas and ponds in eastern Colorado. insects, particularly grasshoppers. Species Description They also eat some vertebrate species, Identification including fish, amphibians, and bird The long-billed curlew, at 20–26 inches eggs/nestlings. Breeding in length, is the largest shorebird in Winter North America. Their primitive- Conservation Status sounding curlee vocalizations are Populations of long-billed curlews considered a harbinger of spring. Their have experienced overall declines in down-curved, sickle-shaped bill is the many areas, especially throughout the largest among shorebirds and inspired eastern United States, due primarily to their genus name, Numenius, derived habitat loss and historic over-hunting. from the Greek word, noumenios, In Colorado, long-billed curlews are meaning of the new crescent moon. listed as a Tier 2 Species of Great- est Conservation Need (CPW 2015). Preferred Habitats The Breeding Bird Survey indicates a Long-billed curlews are considered a significant population decline in Colo- grassland species, but they are rarely rado, and the Colorado Breeding Bird observed far from water. In Colorado, Atlas indicates a decrease in distribu- they are usually associated with ponds, tion.
    [Show full text]
  • Curlew National Grassland Monitoring Report
    Curlew National Grassland Land and Resource Management Plan Monitoring Report The 2002 Curlew National Grassland Plan (Plan) identified goals and objectives for land management over the next decade (pp. 3-1 to 4-11). Goals describe desired conditions for the future and they are typically general without a specific timeframe for achieving them. An objective is a quantifiable statement of progress in meeting goals, and therefore measure progress towards implementing the Plan. The Plan identified objectives for the management of the Curlew National Grassland (Grassland) and established specific time frames to meet each objective (Plan, pp. 5-1 and 5-2). The progress made toward meeting each objective is displayed in Table A of this Monitoring Report (pages 1-12). This evaluation has been made by employees of the Caribou-Targhee National Forest responsible for the management of the Grassland (Forest). These results are used to help design the annual program of work for each resource group. The following table lists the objectives and the actions we have taken towards meeting the objectives in the Plan. Table A: Objectives OBJECTIVE WHEN? RESULTS/EVALUATION GENERAL ECOLOGICAL CONDITIONS Reassess Within The PFC reassessment was completed in 2010. The results of that assessment are summarized in the tables below. vegetation 10 years PFC of (2012) Table 1: Sagebrush Proper Functioning Condition ecosystems Indicators of Properly Functioning 1998 Assessment 2010 vegetation inventory n=87 on the Sagebrush Condition Rated: Rated: Grassland Functioning-at-Risk Functioning-at-Risk and adjacent Structure Balanced range: 10-30 of the area 17 percent of the area Sagebrush canopy crown cover: areas, to with 0-5 sagebrush crown cover.
    [Show full text]
  • First Record of Long-Billed Curlew Numenius Americanus in Peru and Other Observations of Nearctic Waders at the Virilla Estuary Nathan R
    Cotinga 26 First record of Long-billed Curlew Numenius americanus in Peru and other observations of Nearctic waders at the Virilla estuary Nathan R. Senner Received 6 February 2006; final revision accepted 21 March 2006 Cotinga 26(2006): 39–42 Hay poca información sobre las rutas de migración y el uso de los sitios de la costa peruana por chorlos nearcticos. En el fin de agosto 2004 yo reconocí el estuario de Virilla en el dpto. Piura en el noroeste de Peru para identificar los sitios de descanso para los Limosa haemastica en su ruta de migración al sur y aprender más sobre la migración de chorlos nearcticos en Peru. En Virilla yo observí más de 2.000 individuales de 23 especios de chorlos nearcticos y el primer registro de Numenius americanus de Peru, la concentración más grande de Limosa fedoa en Peru, y una concentración excepcional de Limosa haemastica. La combinación de esas observaciones y los resultados de un estudio anterior en el invierno boreal sugiere la posibilidad que Virilla sea muy importante para chorlos nearcticos en Peru. Las observaciones, también, demuestren la necesidad hacer más estudios en la costa peruana durante el año entero, no solemente durante el punto máximo de la migración de chorlos entre septiembre y noviembre. Shorebirds are poorly known in Peru away from bordered for a few hundred metres by sand and established study sites such as Paracas reserve, gravel before low bluffs rise c.30 m. Very little dpto. Ica, and those close to metropolitan areas vegetation grows here, although cows, goats and frequented by visiting birdwatchers and tour pigs owned by Parachique residents graze the area.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrologic Characteristics of the Great Salt Lake, Utah: 1847-1986
    Hydrologic Characteristics of the Great Salt Lake, Utah: 1847-1986 United States Geological Survey Water-.Supply Paper 2332 Hydrologic Characteristics of the Great Salt Lake, Utah: 1847-1986 By TED ARNOW and DOYLE STEPHENS U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY WATER-SUPPLY PAPER 2332 DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR MANUEL LUJAN, Jr., Secretary U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Dallas L. Peck, D1rector Any use of trade, product, or firm names m th1s pubhcat10n 1s for descnptlve purposes only and does not 1mply endorsement by the U S Government UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 1990 For sale by the Books and Open-File Reports Sect1on, U S Geolog1cal Survey, Federal Center, Box 25425, Denver, CO 80225 L1brary of Congress Catalogmg m Pubhcat1on Data Arnow, Ted Hydrolog1c charactenst1cs of the Great Salt lake, Utah, 1847-1986 (U ,S Geolog1cal Survey water-supply paper , 2332) Bibliography p Supt of Docs no I 19 13 2332 1 Hydrology-Utah-Great Salt lake 2 Great Salt lake (Utah) I Stephens, Doyle W II T1tle Ill Senes GB1627 G8A84 1990 551 48'2'0979242 88-600127 CONTENTS Abstract 1 IntroductiOn 1 Lake Levels 3 Prehi~tonc 6 Histonc 8 1847-1982 9 1982-1986 10 Effects of Man's ActiVIties 17 Consumptive Use 17 Railroad Causeway 18 Water Budget 19 Inflow 19 Streams 20 PrecipitatiOn 20 Ground Water 22 Outflow 22 Storage Change 24 The Bnne 24 Chemical Charactensttcs 24 VariatiOns m Sahmty 24 BIOlogtcal Charactensttcs 26 Pnor to 1960 26 1960-1982 27 Subsequent to 1982 28 Summary 29 References Cited 30 Metric Conversion Factors 32 PLATE Satellite Image map of Great Salt Lake and
    [Show full text]
  • The Decline and Fall of the Eskimo Curlew, Or Why Did the Curlew Go
    The decline and fall of the Eskimo Curlew, or did the curlew go extaille? by Richard C. Banks 66Thereis no need to look for a probable bush (1912) and Swenk (1916) seems over- incause for the extermination of the whelming,and there can be little reasonable Eskimo Curlew -- the causeis painfully doubtthat overkill was an importantfactor in apparent.... The destructionof this bird was the demiseof the curlewand in the reductionof mainlydue to unrestrictedshooting, market populationsofother species. Yet, the dogmatic huntingand shipment, particularly during the statementsquoted above suggest that any other spring migration in the United States" (For- factors that may have been involved were bush 1912:427). ignored,and indeed these authors barely men- tionedand quickly discarded other postulated &&One neednot look far to find the cause causes.This paper.will analyzethe circum- •Jwhich led to its destruction.... No, stancesof thedecline of the curlew, attempt to therewas only one cause, slaughter by human placeknown mortality factors into perspective, beings, slaughter in Labrador and New and speculatethat other factors unknown to Englandin summerand fall, slaughterin Forbushand Swenkwere significant in that SouthAmerica in winterand slaughter,worst decline. of all, from Texasto Canadain the spring" (Bent 1929:127). LIFE HISTORY hewriting of the authorscited above, and What little waslearned about the biologyof similar conclusionsby Swenk(1916), have the EskimoCurlew before its populationwas led to generalacceptance of the conceptthat reducedvirtually to nil has been summarized excessiveshooting, particularly by market by Forbush (1912), Swenk(1916), Bent (1929), hunters, was the cause of the extationa of the and Greenway(1958). The speciesbred in the Eskimo Curlew, Numenius borealis, near the Arctic, mainly in the Mackenzie District of the end of the 19th century(Greenway 1958, Vin- Northwest Territories of Canada, but also cent 1966, Bureau of Sport Fisheries and westwardand eastwardfor unknown distances, Wildlife1973).
    [Show full text]
  • Management and Conservation for Farmland Waders
    TECHNICAL NOTE TN688 SEPTEMBER 2017 • ELEC Management and National Advice Hub Conservation for T: 0300 323 0161 E: [email protected] Farmland Waders W: www.fas.scot Summary • Five wading bird species (Oystercatcher, Lapwing, Curlew, Redshank and Snipe) are among the highest wildlife conservation priorities on Scottish farmland • Lapwing and Curlew have seen some of the highest population declines of widespread birds in Scotland in recent decades • Reasons for the declines relate to changes in habitat management and predation • The key to protecting and recovering wader populations is management to provide suitable nesting and feeding habitat and low predation pressure Introduction The term ‘wader’ or ‘wading bird’ is used to describe Oystercatcher, Lapwing, Curlew, Redshank and Snipe are often certain families of birds that are classified within the order referred to as farmland waders as they are dependent on Charadriiformes1, which also includes the gulls, terns and auks. agricultural land for breeding habitat to a greater degree than Waders feed primarily on invertebrates and almost all species any of the other species, although Golden Plover, Ringed Plover, are associated with wetlands or shallow water for at least part Dunlin and Woodcock all use farmland to some extent in parts of the year, although many make use of drier habitats including of the country. Although they are still relatively widespread and farmland, moorland, mountain-tops and woodland, particularly common, farmland waders are among the highest conservation during the breeding season. All species have slender and often priorities in Scotland. This is because four out of the five species long bills, used for probing soft ground for invertebrates, and most have undergone some of the largest population declines of any have quite long legs to allow them to wade into shallow water to Scottish birds in recent decades and all five species are red or feed in mud and sand.
    [Show full text]
  • Sunset Sanderlings
    SANDERLING MOLT Digital photography leads to novel insights about the presupplemental molt of the Sanderling NOTE: All live Sanderling photos in this article are PETER PYLE from the spring of 2019 at Ocean Beach or Fort Fun- San Francisco, California ston Beach, San Francisco, California. Except for Fig. [email protected] 8, all photographs and figures by © Peter Pyle. This is publication #628 of The Institute for Bird Populations. 30 BIRDING | AUGUST 2019 fter moving to San Francisco’s Sunset District in Jan. 2019, I had to find some new local patches, Ocean Beach quickly becoming one of them, and I would head down the hill two or three mornings per week Aon my way to work. Although my original goal was to analyze formative/first-alternate1 feathers in gulls, the Sanderlings soon captured my attention. They were a nutty bunch, hun- dreds of them, running up and down and across and over, chasing each other at top speed, squabbling over mole crabs, and ganging up on small dogs. When big dogs went after the Sanderlings, the Common Ravens came to their rescue, at- tacking the canines and driving them off. Sometimes, for no apparent reason, the Sanderlings freaked out and flew out to sea, a behavior known as “silent dread” in gulls. At other times, dozens or hundreds tended “gardens,” probing patches of heavily bill-pocked sand, indistinguish- able from the rest of the beach, but undoubtedly harboring some favored morsels of food. Then there was the morning, in the middle of January, when I noticed a plucky Sander- ling sitting atop the crosswalk sign at Pacheco Street and the Great Highway, about 100 meters from the ocean, sing- ing! It struck me that the Ocean Beach Sanderlings have perhaps acquired the human behavioral eccentricity of These Sanderlings are “tending a garden” at Ocean Beach, San Francisco, on May 6, 2019.
    [Show full text]