DOCSLIB.ORG

Mechanisms and Performances of Adjuvants in Vaccine Immunogenicity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mechanisms and Performances of Adjuvants in Vaccine Immunogenicity Journal of Applied Biotechnology Reports Mini Review Article Mechanisms and Performances of Adjuvants in Vaccine Immunogenicity Seyed Mohammad Gheibihayat1, Azam Sadeghinia2, Shahram Nazarian3*, Zahra Adeli4 Abstract An adjuvant is a substance that is added to a vaccine to increase the body's immune 1. Young Researchers and Elite Club, Andimeshk response to the vaccine. Vaccines containing adjuvants are tested for safety in Branch, Islamic Azad University, Andimeshk, Iran clinical trials before they are licensed for use. The basic action of adjuvants is 2. Department of Cardiology, Faculty of Medicine, stimulating adaptive immune responses. Adjuvants recently licensed for human Dezful University of Medical Sciences, Dezful, utilization involve alum squalane oil or water emulsion, influenza virosomes, and Iran few cytokines as IFN-γ and IL-2. Some adjuvants are currently under investigation 3. Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, such as DNA motifs, monophosphoryl lipid A, Cholera Toxin, E. coli heat Labile Imam-Hossein University, Tehran, Iran Toxin, Saponins, Immunostimulating complexes, liposomes, Flt3 ligand as a 4. Department of Microbiology, Islamic Azad pleotropic glycoprotein, non-ionic block copolymers. This paper is an overview of University, Damghan Branch, Damghan, Iran most commonly used adjuvants, adjuvant mechanisms, adjuvant formulations and adjuvant limitations. * Corresponding Author Shahram Nazarian Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Imam- Hossein University, Tehran, Iran E-mail: [email protected] Submission Date: 5/2/2015 Keywords: Adjuvants, Vaccine, Immunostimulating Complexe, Alum, MHC Accepted Date: 6/18/2015 Introduction Adjuvant roles Adjuvants (originated from adjuvare as a Latin term, A well practice in experiments of immunology is the means assist or aid) are a cluster of diverse blends which insertion of adjuvant accompanied by antigens in increase or regulate the immunogenicity of the weakly production of vaccine which indicates one of the best proteins or poorly peptides which are used for vaccines [1, approaches for developing the next generation of peptide 2]. The basic action of adjuvants is stimulating adaptive subdivision vaccines. The potentiality to produce immuno- immune responses. Choosing an adjuvant in vaccine logical ‘incidents’ that is essential to cause the wanted development is often as notable as selecting the vaccine immune response is a factor to group adjuvants (Fig. 1). antigens which is enough to mimic natural infections or Alternative grouping through physical and chemical traditional vaccines. In the 1920s, the notion of adjuvant characteristics may be more profitable because few was conceptualized from observations such as those of adjuvants act as stimuli more than one immunological Ramon et al who mentioned that horses with abscess at the track. Adjuvants may show their immunostimulatory inoculation site of diphtheria toxoid, produced higher impacts via the succeeding mechanisms: (1) supplying distinct antibody titers. Then, they discovered that an antigen depot; (2) activating the intrinsic immunity by abscess caused by the injection of unrelated substances Pathogen Recognition Receptors (PRR); (3) co-stimulating accompanied with the diphtheria toxoid, enhanced the the immune cells; (4) immunomodulating, e.g., making immunity against the toxoid [3]. The most suitable mature Antigen Presenting Cells (APC) [7, 8]. adjuvant for a determined vaccine antigen depends Total procedures consist of direct or indirect inducement significantly on the kind of immune response which is of APC, specifically Dendritic Cells (DCs). DCs play a indispensable for protective immunity. Although, some pivotal role to bridge the intrinsic immune system by not adjuvants are ostensibly potent, but they are too harmful to specified internalization of the antigens which consequent- the host. Thus, their potency often conflicts with host ly are represented to the sequenced T cells. The confronted safety and tolerability. They can be utilized for various antigens may continuously be taken up by DCs through aims: a) increasing immunogenicity of recombinant pinocytosis and/or phagocytosis and at the same time, their antigens, b) reducing the quantity of antigens or the PRR play role as an “identifier” for infectious agents. DCs, multiplicity of immunizations required for safeguarding upon inducement of PRR, deliver diverse soluble immunity, c) improving the efficiency of vaccine in mediators like cytokines and interferon (IFN) type 1 as a newborn babies, the old persons or immunocompromised part of the intrinsic immune response [10]. The activated individuals, or d) up taking antigens by the mucosa just as DCs commence a response via processing the antigens and systems for antigen delivery [4-6]. giving them to naive CD4+ T cells. Meanwhile, DCs by up Journal of Applied Biotechnology Reports, Volume 2, Issue 3, Summer 2015; 257-264 All rights reserved for official publication of Baqiyatallah university of medical sciences© Seyed Mohammad Gheibihayat, et al. Mechanisms and Performances of Adjuvants Figure 1. Cascade in schematic view caused by adjuvants. These events are necessary for increasing and adopting immune response opposed to vaccine antigens [9]. regulating MHC class II as well as co-stimulating are mediated by the secretion of IFNγ which are thought to molecules induce interactions between DC and CD4+ T be liable to kill intracellular pathogens. In contrast, the cells. This immunological cascade leads to the promotion secretion of IL-4, IL-5, IL-6, and IL-10, which leads to the of optimal CD4+ stimulation. Anyway, this cascade is generation of antibodies, characterizes Th2 responses. It is inadequate to prime CD8+ T cell which is vital for vaccine shown that vaccine adjuvants that contain TLR ligands are efficacy opposing to cancer or intracellular pathogens. For able to induce T cell responses of higher avidity. To utilize DCs, Cross-presentation is indispensable to exhibit MHC the TLR ligand as a potential adjuvant, this immense class I peptide complexes to CD8+ T cells to make a CTL research was prompted. As it is believed that for desired response. This fact which the detailed immunological antigen presentation and later stimulation of antigen- actions are needed to produce this response has been specific T cell responses, adjuvants based on the TLR comprehensively appraised by Joffre and workmates [11]. ligand should be co-delivered with the optimal Toll-Like receptors (TLR) among the PRRs are the most antigen to target the same phagosome cargo at the APC. studied receptors that are well- known as the main interest Therefore, a promising method of designing new vaccines of modern adjuvant targeting. TLR are transmembrane is represented via the ability of TLR to connect innate and proteins type 1 along with an extracellular domain of adaptive immune responses [13]. interspersed leucine-rich repeat (LRR) motifs which are A delivery stand for the antigens of vaccine is executed by involved in the identification of pathogen associated with effects of diverse adjuvants. It is observed that, liposomes, molecular patterns (PAMP), like lipopolysaccharide emulsion and alum as particulate-based adjuvants increase (LPS) [12]. Engagement of PAMP with TLR leads to the antigen uptake by making prolong the contact of antigen to activation of mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway and the DC [14]. Two discovered subpopulations of DC are NFκβ which ends in regulation of pro-inflammatory Tissue-resident and migratory. Antigens at the site of cytokines (interleukin-1β, TNF-α and chemokines). administration are presented to resident DC placed in In initiating adaptive immune response, TLR activation tissues close to the mucosal superficies. Tissue resident also plays a main role as directing the immune system DC which subsequently named migratory DC, upon anti- toward Th1- and Th2-biased responses [12]. Th1 responses gen exposure, undergoes a process of maturation and 178258 Journal of Applied Biotechnology Reports, Volume 2, Issue 3, Summer 2015 Seyed Mohammad Gheibihayat, et al. Mechanisms and Performances of Adjuvants commences to migrate to the lymph nodes [15]. Naïve T Toxin (CT) [27], E. coli heat Labile Toxin (LT) [28-30], cells and B cells do not spread at the non-lymphoid places Saponins [31], Immunostimulating complexes (ISCOMs) such as the most places of injection in the body and are [32], liposomes [33], Flt3 ligand as a pleotropic glycopro- often discovered at the lymphoid organs such as the lymph tein [34], non-ionic block copolymers [35]. nodes. Thus, antigens in order to be given to the particular Freund’s adjuvants T cells require reaching the lymph nodes by migratory DC. Jules Freund produced a powerful immunogenic adjuvant These kinds of adjuvants supply a depot development that in 1940 which is known as Freund’s complete adjuvant traps antigens at the site of injection, providing a release of (FCA). It was consisted of a mixture of mineral oil, a antigens to be obtained by migratory DC. So, the vaccine surfactant (Aracel A), and heat killed Mycobacterium antigen fate in time, area and concentration is affected by tuberculosis (MTB).This adjuvant prolongs antigen these adjuvants through the activation of antigen CD4+ T persistence. A muramyle dipeptide which is an element of cells and promoting uptake of the antigen at site of the mycobacterial cell wall activates macrophages and injection. On this, particulate adjuvants can bind antigens makes FCA very potent.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Preparation Of' Immunostimulating Complexes
    ACTA VET. BRNO, 61,1992: 37-41 PREPARATION OF' IMMUNOSTIMULATING COMPLEXES. (ISCOM) CONTAINING BOVINE HERPESVIRUS 1 PROTEINS J. ~z, J. HAMPL, J. StlpANEK and B. SMfD Veterinary Research Institute, 62132 Bmo Received NOfJember 28,1991 Abstract Franz J., J. Hampl, J. Steplinek, B. Smid: Preparation of ImmunostimuJ.a­ ting Complexes (ISCOM) Containing BOfJine HerpesfJirus 1 Proteins. Acta vet. Bmo, 61,1992: 37-41. A method for obtaining lSCOMs with incorporated bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV-l) proteins from various amounts of cholesterol, phosphatidylcholine and Quil A is described. The highest virus protein incorporation rate obtained was 25 %. Morpho­ logy of ISCOMs depended on amounts of Quil A, cholesterol and phosphatidylcho­ line used. A high immunogenicity ofBHV-I-ISCOM, as compared with free virus­ proteins, was confirmed experimentally in mice. BOfJine herpesfJirusBHV-1, fJirus protein, ISCOM, antibody response One ofthe essential means for the control ofvirus diseases offarm animals are vaccines, capable ofin· ducing specific resistance against the causal agent in individual animals and animal populations. Cur­ rent technologies use suspensions of complete virus particles propagated in cell cultures or laboratory animals. In addition to the specific immunogenic antigen, such suspensions contain a number of other proteins,originsting from culture media, disintegrated cells or even microbial contaminants. Such a broad antigenic spectrum, reaching far beyond 1ihe purpose of vaccination, is unwanted and therefore alternative methods for producing quality biologicals are developed currently. Progressive trends in the control of virus diseases are focussed on the development of subunit vaccines. Protein subunits are prepared by highly effective purification procedures or by biotech­ nological methods, such as chemical synthesis of peptides or DNA recombination.
    [Show full text]
  • Matrix-M™ Adjuvation Broadens Protection Induced by Seasonal Trivalent Virosomal Influenza Vaccine
    Cox et al. Virology Journal (2015) 12:210 DOI 10.1186/s12985-015-0435-9 RESEARCH Open Access Matrix-M™ adjuvation broadens protection induced by seasonal trivalent virosomal influenza vaccine Freek Cox1, Eirikur Saeland1*, Matthijs Baart1, Martin Koldijk2, Jeroen Tolboom1, Liesbeth Dekking1, Wouter Koudstaal2, Karin Lövgren Bengtsson3, Jaap Goudsmit2 and Katarina Radošević4 Abstract Background: Influenza virus infections are responsible for significant morbidity worldwide and therefore it remains a high priority to develop more broadly protective vaccines. Adjuvation of current seasonal influenza vaccines has the potential to achieve this goal. Methods: To assess the immune potentiating properties of Matrix-M™, mice were immunized with virosomal trivalent seasonal vaccine adjuvated with Matrix-M™. Serum samples were isolated to determine the hemagglutination inhibiting (HAI) antibody titers against vaccine homologous and heterologous strains. Furthermore, we assess whether adjuvation with Matrix-M™ broadens the protective efficacy of the virosomal trivalent seasonal vaccine against vaccine homologous and heterologous influenza viruses. Results: Matrix-M™ adjuvation enhanced HAI antibody titers and protection against vaccine homologous strains. Interestingly, Matrix-M™ adjuvation also resulted in HAI antibody titers against heterologous influenza B strains, but not against the tested influenza A strains. Even though the protection against heterologous influenza A was induced by the adjuvated vaccine, in the absence of HAI titers the protection was accompanied by severe clinical scores and body weight loss. In contrast, in the presence of heterologous HAI titers full protection against the heterologous influenza B strain without any disease symptoms was obtained. Conclusion: The results of this study emphasize the promising potential of a Matrix-M™-adjuvated seasonal trivalent virosomal influenza vaccine.
    [Show full text]
  • Natural and Synthetic Saponins As Vaccine Adjuvants
    Review Natural and Synthetic Saponins as Vaccine Adjuvants Pengfei Wang Department of Chemistry, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA; [email protected] Abstract: Saponin adjuvants have been extensively studied for their use in veterinary and human vaccines. Among them, QS-21 stands out owing to its unique profile of immunostimulating activity, inducing a balanced Th1/Th2 immunity, which is valuable to a broad scope of applications in com- bating various microbial pathogens, cancers, and other diseases. It has recently been approved for use in human vaccines as a key component of combination adjuvants, e.g., AS01b in Shingrix® for herpes zoster. Despite its usefulness in research and clinic, the cellular and molecular mechanisms of QS-21 and other saponin adjuvants are poorly understood. Extensive efforts have been devoted to studies for understanding the mechanisms of QS-21 in different formulations and in different combi- nations with other adjuvants, and to medicinal chemistry studies for gaining mechanistic insights and development of practical alternatives to QS-21 that can circumvent its inherent drawbacks. In this review, we briefly summarize the current understandings of the mechanism underlying QS-21’s adjuvanticity and the encouraging results from recent structure-activity-relationship (SAR) studies. Keywords: adjuvant; saponin; mechanism; SAR; QS-21; VSA-1; VSA-2 1. Introduction Traditional vaccines are whole-organism-based, using live attenuated or inactivated Citation: Wang, P. Natural and viruses or bacteria. These vaccines are quite reactogenic due to the presence of numerous Synthetic Saponins as Vaccine pathogen-associated-molecular-patterns (PAMPs) that are responsible for activation, and Adjuvants.
    [Show full text]
  • The Iscom Structure As an Immune-Enhancing Moiety: Experience with Viral Systems
    CHARACTERISTICS AND USE OF NE W-GENERATION ADJUVANTS 531 The iscom structure as an immune-enhancing moiety: experience with viral systems I. Claassen (l)t2) and A. Osterhaus (1) (‘) Laboratory of Immunobiology, and 12)Laboratory of Control of Biological Products, National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection, POB 1, 3720 BA Bilthoven (The Netherlands) The iscom as an antigen-presenting structure terested in evaluating the potential of the immune- stimulating complex (iscom) as a carrier for viral Extensive studies on fundamental mechanisms of proteins. protection induced by vaccination have led to insight Iscom was first described in 1984 (Morein et al., into the components necessary for the induction of 1984). It is a cage-like structure, usually about 30 to protective immunity. This has enabled vaccine 40 nm in diameter, composed of glycosides present researchers to focus on those components which are in the adjuvant Quil-A, cholesterol, the immunizing involved in the actual induction of immune responses (protein) antigen and also, in most cases, phos- and to exclude irrelevant, immunosuppressive or pholipids. Although similar structures had been ob- potentially harmful components from vaccines. served before (Horzinek et al., 1973), it was not until The “ideal” vaccine should meet the following the work of Morein et al. that their potential as an requirements: the induction of a long-lasting anti- immune-enhancing moiety was recognized. body response of biologically active antibodies, which Quil-A is a crude extract from the bark of Quil- should be elicited even in the presence of maternal Baja saponaria Molina which has potent adjuvant ac- antibodies ; functional T-cell responses which com- tivity and is widely used as an adjuvant in veterinary prise both major histocompatibility complex (MHC) vaccines.
    [Show full text]
  • An Immune Stimulating Complex (ISCOM) Subunit Rabies Vaccine Protects Dogs and Mice Against Street Rabies Challenge
    An immune stimulating complex (ISCOM) subunit rabies vaccine protects dogs and mice against street rabies challenge M. Fekadu*ll~ J.H. Shaddock*, J. Ekstr6m*, A. Osterhaus *, D.W. Sanderlin*, B. Sundquist ,~ and B. Morein* Dogs and mice were immunized with either a rabies glycoprotein subunit vaccine incorporated into an immune stimulating complex (ISCOM) or a commercial human diploid cell vaccine ( HDCV) prepared from a Pitman Moore ( PM) rabies vaccine strain. Pre-exposure vaccination of mice with two in traperitoneal ( i.p. ) doses of 360 ng ISCOM or 0.5 ml HDCV protected 95% (38/40) and 90% (36/40) of mice, respectively, against a lethal intracerebral (i.c.) dose with challenge virus strain (CVS). One 360 ng i.p. dose of ISCOM protected 87.5% (35/40) of mice against i.c. challenge with CVS. Three groups of five dogs were vaccinated intramuscularly ( i.m.) with 730 ng of rabies ISCOM prepared from either the PM or the CVS rabies strains, and they resisted lethal street rabies challenge. Postexposure treatment of mice with three or four 120 ng i.m. doses of ISCOM protected 90% (27/30) and 94% (45/48), respectively, of mice inoculated in the footpad with street rabies virus, but three doses of HDCV conferred no protection. When .four doses of HDCV were administered postexposure, 78% (32/41) of the mice died of anaphylactic shock; 21% (11/52) of mice had already died of rabies 4 days after the third vaccine dose was administered. Keywords : Rabies ; ISCOM ; human diploid cell vaccine ; postexposure ; treatment ; anaphylactic shock INTRODUCTION animals only pre-exposure vaccination is practised.
    [Show full text]
  • (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,352,697 B1 Cox Et Al
    USOO6352697 B1 (12) United States Patent (10) Patent No.: US 6,352,697 B1 Cox et al. (45) Date of Patent: *Mar. 5, 2002 (54) SAPONIN PREPARATIONS AND USE (58) Field of Search ........................... 424/184.1, 278.1, THEREOF IN ISCOMS 424/283.1; 514/885 (75) Inventors: John Cooper Cox, Bullengarook; Alan (56) References Cited Robert Coulter, Glen Iris, both of (AU); Bror Morein, Uppsala (SE); FOREIGN PATENT DOCUMENTS Karin Lovgren-Bengtsson, Uppsala (SE); Bo Sundquist, Uppsala (SE) WO WO 88/09336 12/1988 WO WO 90/03184 4/1990 WO WO 92/06710 * 4/1992 (73) Assignee: Iscotec A.B., Stockholm (SE) WO WO 93/05789 4/1993 (*) Notice: This patent issued on a continued pros WO WO 94/O1118 1/1994 ecution application filed under 37 CFR WO WO95/09179 4/1995 1.53(d), and is subject to the twenty year OTHER PUBLICATIONS patent term provisions of 35 U.S.C. 154(a)(2). Cox, J.C. and Coulter, A.R. (1992) “Advances in Adjuvant Technology and Application' in Animal Parasite Chapter 4, Subject to any disclaimer, the term of this pp. 68–79, W.K. Young, Ed., CRC Press. patent is extended or adjusted under 35 Kensil, C.R. et al., Separation and characterization of U.S.C. 154(b) by 0 days. saponins with adjuvant from Quillaja saponaria 1991 (146) (21) Appl. No.: 08/809,987 431–437 Journal of Immunology. (22) PCT Filed: Oct. 12, 1995 * cited by examiner (86) PCT No.: PCT/AU95/00670 Primary Examiner Patrick J. Nolan S371 Date: Feb.
    [Show full text]
  • SAPONIN from QUILLAJA BARK PURIFIED Sigma Prod. No. S4521 Storage: Room Temperature
    SAPONIN FROM QUILLAJA BARK PURIFIED Sigma Prod. No. S4521 Storage: Room Temperature CAS NUMBER: 8047-15-2 SYNONYMS: Sapogenin Glycosides1 STRUCTURE: Quillaja saponaria saponin (Quillaja saponins) is a heterogenous mixture of molecules varying both in their aglycone and sugar moieties.2 The main aglycone (sapogenin) moiety is quillaic acid, a triterpene of predominantly 30-carbon atoms (hydrophobic) of the D12-oleanane type. The aglycone is bound to various sugars (hydrophilic) including glucose, glucuronic acid, galactose, xylose, apiose, rhamnose, fucose and arabinose. Sapogenin devoid of any sugars can be isolated by acid hydrolysis of saponins.3,4,5,6,7 The structure of a component isolated from the acylated triterpenoid saponin mixture of Quillaja saponaria was reported.8 PHYSICAL DESCRIPTION: Appearance: powder3 Methods for the identification and quantitative determination of the aglycone and carbohydrate moieties of saponins have been reported.2,4,9,10,11 METHOD OF PREPARATION: Quillaja saponin is obtained from the bark of the South American soaptree, Quillaja saponaria Molina (Rosaceae family). Product S4521 is purified by ultrafiltration to reduce low molecular weight contaminants.3 A general method of preparation of the extract has been reported.2 STABILITY / STORAGE AS SUPPLIED: Quillaja saponin is hygroscopic and is expected to be stable for at least one year at room temperature when stored dry. SOLUBILITY / SOLUTION STABILITY: Quillaja saponin is soluble in water yielding micelles with an average MW of 56,000. The solubility is tested at 50 mg/ml deionized water.3 The solubility in water may be increased by additions of small amounts of alkali.12 S4521 Page 1 of 3 10/25/96 - ARO SAPONIN FROM QUILLAJA BARK PURIFIED Sigma Prod.
    [Show full text]
  • Iscoms and Immunostimulation with Viral Antigens
    Chapter 2 ISCOMs and Immunostimulation with Viral Antigens Stefan Hoglund, Kristian Dalsgaard, Karin Lovgren, Bo Sundquist, Ab Osterhaus, and Bror Morein 1. INTRODUCTION With the dissection of microorganisms followed by biochemical and immunolog­ ical characterization, antigens inducing protective immunity became recognized. Early attempts to use these isolated antigens as vaccines, i.e. subunit vaccines, showed that although immunogenic in situ as part of the microorganism, they were not immunogenic as purified antigens. Subsequent studies showed that the formation of antigen into defined multimeric forms such as protein micelles or into liposomes made them considerably more immunogenic. In a way, micelles and liposomes mimic a submicroscopic particle of a microorganism with several copies of surface antigens. By contrast, monomeric forms of antigens, e.g., envelope proteins of parainfluenza-3 virus or Semliki forest virus, not only had a low immunogenicity but had a specific suppressive effect on the immune re­ sponse as well; this was shown when the monomers were given simultaneously Stefan HOglund Institute of Biochemistry, Biomedical Center, Uppsala, Sweden. Kristian DaIsgaard State Veterinary Institute of Virus Research, Lindholm, Kalvehave, Denmark. Karin LOvgren and Bror Morein The National Veterinary Institute, Department of Virology, Biomedical Center, Uppsala, Sweden. Bo Sundquist The National Veterinary Institute, Division of Vaccine Research, Uppsala, Sweden. Ab Osterhaus National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Hygiene, Bilthoven, The Netherlands. 39 J. R. Harris (ed.), Virally Infected Cells © Springer Science+Business Media New York 1989 40 Stefan Hoglund et aI. with the same antigen in a micelle (Morein et aI., 1982, 1983; Morein and Simons, 1985; Jennings, 1987).
    [Show full text]
  • Slow Delivery Immunization Enhances HIV Neutralizing Antibody and Germinal Center Responses Via Modulation of Immunodominance
    Slow Delivery Immunization Enhances HIV Neutralizing Antibody and Germinal Center Responses via Modulation of Immunodominance The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Cirelli, Kimberly M. "Slow Delivery Immunization Enhances HIV Neutralizing Antibody and Germinal Center Responses via Modulation of Immunodominance." Cell 177, 5 (May 2019): P1153-1171.e28 © 2019 Elsevier As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.012 Publisher Elsevier BV Version Author's final manuscript Citable link https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/125926 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ HHS Public Access Author manuscript Author ManuscriptAuthor Manuscript Author Cell. Author Manuscript Author manuscript; Manuscript Author available in PMC 2020 May 16. Published in final edited form as: Cell. 2019 May 16; 177(5): 1153–1171.e28. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.04.012. Slow delivery immunization enhances HIV neutralizing antibody and germinal center responses via modulation of immunodominance Kimberly M. Cirelli1,2, Diane G. Carnathan2,3,4, Bartek Nogal2,5, Jacob T. Martin2,6, Oscar L. Rodriguez7, Amit A. Upadhyay3,11, Chiamaka A. Enemuo3,4, Etse H. Gebru3,4, Yury Choe3,4, Federico Viviano3,4, Catherine Nakao1, Matthias G. Pauthner2,8, Samantha Reiss1,2, Christopher A. Cottrell2,5, Melissa L. Smith7, Raiza Bastidas2,8, William Gibson9, Amber N. Wolabaugh3, Mariane B. Melo2,6, Benjamin Cosette6, Venkatesh Kumar10, Nirav B. Patel11, Talar Tokatlian2,6, Sergey Menis2,8, Daniel W. Kulp2,8,12, Dennis R. Burton2,8,13, Ben Murrell10,14, William R.
    [Show full text]
  • Saponins from Quillaja Saponaria and Quillaja Brasiliensis: Particular Chemical Characteristics and Biological Activities
    molecules Review Saponins from Quillaja saponaria and Quillaja brasiliensis: Particular Chemical Characteristics and Biological Activities Juliane Deise Fleck 1, Andresa Heemann Betti 2, Francini Pereira da Silva 1, Eduardo Artur Troian 1, Cristina Olivaro 3, Fernando Ferreira 4 and Simone Gasparin Verza 1,* 1 Molecular Microbiology Laboratory, Institute of Health Sciences, Feevale University, Novo Hamburgo 93525-075, RS, Brazil; julianefl[email protected] (J.D.F.); [email protected] (F.P.d.S.); [email protected] (E.A.T.) 2 Bioanalysis Laboratory, Institute of Health Sciences, Feevale University, Novo Hamburgo 93525-075, RS, Brazil; [email protected] 3 Science and Chemical Technology Department, University Center of Tacuarembó, Udelar, Tacuarembó 45000, Uruguay; [email protected] 4 Organic Chemistry Department, Carbohydrates and Glycoconjugates Laboratory, Udelar, Mondevideo 11600, Uruguay; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +55-51-3586-8800 Academic Editors: Vassilios Roussis and Efstathia Ioannou Received: 25 October 2018; Accepted: 28 December 2018; Published: 4 January 2019 Abstract: Quillaja saponaria Molina represents the main source of saponins for industrial applications. Q. saponaria triterpenoids have been studied for more than four decades and their relevance is due to their biological activities, especially as a vaccine adjuvant and immunostimulant, which have led to important research in the field of vaccine development. These saponins, alone or incorporated into immunostimulating complexes (ISCOMs), are able to modulate immunity by increasing antigen uptake, stimulating cytotoxic T lymphocyte production (Th1) and cytokines (Th2) in response to different antigens. Furthermore, antiviral, antifungal, antibacterial, antiparasitic, and antitumor activities are also reported as important biological properties of Quillaja triterpenoids.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection, Systemic IFN, and Antibody Responses Induced by an ISCOM
    Protection, systemic IFNγ, and antibody responses induced by an ISCOM-based vaccine against a recent equine influenza virus in its natural host Romain Paillot, Humphrey Grimmett, Debra Elton, Janet Daly To cite this version: Romain Paillot, Humphrey Grimmett, Debra Elton, Janet Daly. Protection, systemic IFNγ, and antibody responses induced by an ISCOM-based vaccine against a recent equine influenza virus in its natural host. Veterinary Research, BioMed Central, 2008, 39 (3), pp.1. 10.1051/vetres:2007062. hal-00902919 HAL Id: hal-00902919 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00902919 Submitted on 1 Jan 2008 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Vet. Res. (2008) 39:21 www.vetres.org DOI: 10.1051/vetres:2007062 C INRA, EDP Sciences, 2008 Original article Protection, systemic IFN, and antibody responses induced by an ISCOM-based vaccine against a recent equine influenza virus in its natural host Romain Paillot1*, Humphrey Grimmett2,DebraElton1, Janet M. Daly1,3 1 Animal Health Trust, Centre for Preventive Medicine, Lanwades Park, Newmarket, Suffolk, CB8 7UU, UK 2 Schering Plough, Animal Health, Breakspear Rd, South Harefield, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB9 6LS, UK 3 Present address: Viral Brain Infections Group, University of Liverpool, Daulby Street, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK (Received 31 August 2007; accepted 9 November 2007) Abstract – In the horse, conventional inactivated or subunit vaccines against equine influenza virus (EIV) induce a short-lived antibody-based immunity to infection.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection, Systemic IFN , and Antibody Responses Induced by An
    Vet. Res. (2008) 39:21 www.vetres.org DOI: 10.1051/vetres:2007062 C INRA, EDP Sciences, 2008 Original article Protection, systemic IFN, and antibody responses induced by an ISCOM-based vaccine against a recent equine influenza virus in its natural host Romain Paillot1*, Humphrey Grimmett2,DebraElton1, Janet M. Daly1,3 1 Animal Health Trust, Centre for Preventive Medicine, Lanwades Park, Newmarket, Suffolk, CB8 7UU, UK 2 Schering Plough, Animal Health, Breakspear Rd, South Harefield, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB9 6LS, UK 3 Present address: Viral Brain Infections Group, University of Liverpool, Daulby Street, Liverpool L69 3GA, UK (Received 31 August 2007; accepted 9 November 2007) Abstract – In the horse, conventional inactivated or subunit vaccines against equine influenza virus (EIV) induce a short-lived antibody-based immunity to infection. Alternative strategies of vaccination have been subsequently developed to mimic the long-term protection induced by natural infection with the virus. One of these approaches is the use of immune-stimulating complex (ISCOM)-based vaccines. ISCOM vaccines induce a strong antibody response and protection against influenza in horses, humans, and a mouse model. Cell-mediated immunity (CMI) has been demonstrated in humans and mice after ISCOM vaccination, but rarely investigated in the horse. The aim of this study was to evaluate EIV-specific immune responses after intra-muscular vaccination with an ISCOM-EIV vaccine (EQUIP F) containing both equine influenza H7N7 (A/eq/Newmarket/77) and H3N8 (A/eq/Borlänge/91 and A/eq/Kentucky/98) strains. The antibody response was measured by single radial haemolysis (SRH) assay using different H3N8 EIV strains.
    [Show full text]