DOCSLIB.ORG

Flooding in North-Western Bangladesh

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

FLOODING IN NORTH‐WESTERN BANGLADESH HCTT JOINT NEEDS ASSESSMENT About this Report Nature of disaster: River and Monsoon Flooding Date of disaster: Initial reports from around the 15th August. JNA Triggered on the 19th August Location: North‐west districts of Lalmonirhat, Nilphamari, Kurigram, Rangpur, Gaibanda. Bogra, Sirajgonj, Jamalpur and Sherpur Assessment by: Multi‐stakeholder participation using the JNA format at Union level and secondary data review Date of Publication: FIRST DRAFT CIRCULATED 31.08.2014 THIS VERSION INCORMPORATING CLUSTER COMMENTS AND ANALYSIS 07.09.2014 Report prepared by: Multi‐stakeholder team Inquiries to: Abdul Wahed (CARE), Mahbub Rahman (CARE), Ahasanul Hoque (ACAPS), Liam Costello (FSC), Jenny Burley (SI) Sandie Walton‐Ellery (ACAPS) Cover photo Jafar Alam, Islamic Relief, Women in Dewanganj (used with their permission) Bangladesh, September 8, 2014 FINDINGS: Joint Needs Assessment: Flooding in north‐western Bangladesh – 08 September 2014 Page 1 CONTENTS 1. Overview of the situation and the disaster ........................................................................................... 6 2. Maps of the affected area ................................................................................................................... 10 3. Priorities reported at Union level ........................................................................................................ 11 3.1 Priorities for immediate assistance............................................................................................. 11 3.2 Need of external assistance for immediate support .................................................................. 12 3.2.1 Recovery Needs ...................................................................................................................... 13 4. Affected areas and populations ........................................................................................................... 14 5. Assessment Methodology ................................................................................................................... 15 5.1 Assessment Chronology .............................................................................................................. 17 5.2 The use of Union rather than Upazila information ..................................................................... 17 5.3 Limitations ................................................................................................................................... 17 5.4 Districts and Upazilas included in the assessment ..................................................................... 18 6. Findings by sector ................................................................................................................................ 20 6.1 WASH .......................................................................................................................................... 20 6.1.1 Water ...................................................................................................................................... 21 6.1.2 Sanitation ................................................................................................................................ 22 6.1.3 Hygiene ................................................................................................................................... 23 6.2 Food Security & Livelihoods ........................................................................................................ 24 6.2.1 Food Security .......................................................................................................................... 25 6.2.2 Livelihoods .............................................................................................................................. 26 6.2.3 Agriculture............................................................................................................................... 28 6.3 Shelter ......................................................................................................................................... 32 6.4 Education .................................................................................................................................... 38 6.5 Protection ................................................................................................................................... 42 6.6 Nutrition ...................................................................................................................................... 43 6.7 Health .......................................................................................................................................... 46 6.8 Accessibility to the affected areas .............................................................................................. 51 6.8.1 Accessibility ............................................................................................................................. 52 6.8.2 Communication ....................................................................................................................... 52 FINDINGS: Joint Needs Assessment: Flooding in north‐western Bangladesh – 08 September 2014 Pg2 ACRONYMS Acronym Expansion ACAPS The Assessment Capacities Project BDT Bangladesh Taka CFW Cash for Work CGI Corrugated Iron DAE Department of Agricultural Extension DLS Directorate of Livestock Services DMIC Disaster Management Information Committee EiE Education in Emergencies FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation FFW Food for Work FS Food Security GAM Global Acute Malnutrition GoB Government of Bangladesh Ha Hectare HCTT Humanitarian Coordination Task Team HH Household HtR Hard to Reach INGO‐ESG INGO Emergency Sub Group IPC Integrated Food Security Phase Classification JNA Joint Needs Assessment LCG DER Local Consultative Group for Disaster Emergency Response MoA Ministry of Agriculture MT Metric Tonne NAWG Needs Assessment Working Group NGO Non Government Organisation SAM Severe Acute Malnutrition Tk Taka ToR Terms of Reference ULO Upazila Livestock Officer UN United Nations WASH Water, sanitation and health WFP World Food Programme WHO World Health Organisation FINDINGS: Joint Needs Assessment: Flooding in north‐western Bangladesh – 08 September 2014 Pg3 HCTT JOINT NEEDS ASSESSMENT MONSOON AND RIVER FLOODING IN NORTH‐WESTERN BANGLADESH Report dated 8th September, 2014 ‐ based on data collected from the 25th ‐28th August and including input, comments and analysis received from stakeholders. No further versions or updates of this report are anticipated. KEY FINDINGS Almost 2 million people are affected in the nine districts assessed. By visiting officials at the Union level, the JNA found that 1,876,636 people were reported as affected – this is 33% of the population in the affected area. - 642,264 people affected in Kurigram (38% of the total population of the affected) - 423,679 people affected in Sirajgonj (43% of the total population of the district affected) - 338,459 people affected in Gaibandha (41% of the total population of the district affected) - 140,610 people affected in Jamalpur (29% of the total population of the district affected) - 111,239 people affected in Bogra (61% of the total population of the district affected) - 81,091 people affected in Lalmonirhat (11% of the total population of the district affected) - 64,603 people affected in Rangpur (19% of the total population of the district affected) - 50,876 people affected in Sherpur (26% of the total population of the district affected) - 23,815 people affected in Nilphamari (9% of the total population of the district affected) In terms of priority districts: - By percentage of the population affected, the districts of most concern are Bogra, Sirajgonj, and Gaibandha - Kurigram is a priority district because approximately 650,000 people are affected and reports indicate that over 120,000 people are presently displaced Based on female headed HHs comprising 7.8% of the total households in the area, it is estimated that 146,378 female headed households are affected. Overall, food is the first priority reported by Union officials The most impacted livelihood groups at this stage appear to be small and marginal farmers, and day labourers (agricultural and non‐agricultural). Other main reported needs include livelihoods, sanitation and water Although greater investigation is needed, present information indicates significant impact to standing crops which will impact agricultural labour, potentially extend the lean season and have “knock on” effects on food security1 Immediate food security has been severely affected and food stocks destroyed. A significant proportion of assessed unions of affected areas in Bogra, Sirajganj, Gaibandha, Jamalpur, Kurigram and Sherpur districts reported immediate relief needs and zero or inadequate resources available at union levels to manage the needs Union authorities report food, followed by sanitation and livelihoods as their main priorities for assistance DMIC reports that 153,337 houses are destroyed and/or damaged in the districts under consideration.2 As people return home and waters recede damage to houses is likely to become for evident and this number may increase 1 Informal information from agricultural experts indicates that the Aman crop is most likely lost and questions remain over the ability to plant the winter Boro crop. 2DMIC, Situation report, 4th September 2014. FINDINGS: Joint Needs Assessment: Flooding
Recommended publications

  • Rhd Road Network, Rangpur Zone

    RHD ROAD NETWORK, RANGPUR ZONE Banglabandha 5 N Tentulia Nijbari N 5 Z 5 0 6 Burimari 0 INDIA Patgram Panchagarh Z Mirgarh 5 9 0 Angorpota 3 1 0 0 5 Z Dhagram Bhaulaganj Chilahati Atwari Z 57 Z 06 5 0 Kolonihat Boda 2 1 Tunirhat Gomnati 3 0 Dhaldanga 7 Ruhea Z 5 N 6 5 Z 5 0 0 Dimla 0 0 2 3 7 9 2 5 6 Z 54 INDIA 5 Debiganj Z50 Sardarhat Z 9 5 0 5 5 Domar Hatibanda Bhurungamari Baliadangi Z N Kathuria Boragarihat Z5 Bahadur Dragha 002 2 Z5 0 7 0 03 5 Thakurgaon Z RLY 7 R 0 Station 58 2 7 7 Jaldhaka 2 5 Bus 6 Dharmagarh Stand Z 5 1 Z Z5 70 029 Z5 Nekmand Z Mogalhat 5 Kaliganj 6 Z5 Tengonmari 17 Nageshwari 2 7 56 4 7 Z 2 09 1 Raninagar Kadamtala 0 Z 0 0 57 5 9 0 Z 0 5 Phulbari Z 5 5 2 Z 5 5 Z Namorihat 0 Kalibari 2 Khansama 16 6 5 56 Z 2 Z Z Aditmari 01 Madarganj 50 Z5018 N509 Z59 4 Ranisonkail N5 08 Tebaria Nilphamari Kishoreganj 8 Z5 Kutubpur 00 008 Lalmonirhat Bhitarbond Z5 Z 2 Z5018 Z5018 Shaptibari 5 2 6 4 Darwani Z 2 6 0 1 0 5 Manthanahat 5 R Z5 Z 9 6 Z 0 00 Pirganj Bakultala 0 Barabari 5 2 5 5 5 1 0 Z Z Z Z5002 7 5 5 Z5002 Birganj 0 0 02 Gangachara N 5 0 5 Moshaldangi Z5020 06 6 06 0 5 0 N 5 Haragach Haripur Z 7 0 N5 Habumorh Bochaganj 0 5 4 Z 2 Z5 61 3 6 5 1 11 Z 5 Taraganj 2 6 Kurigram 0 N Hazirhat 5 Kaharol 5 Teesta 18 Z N5 Ranirbandar N5 Z Kaunia Bridge Rajarhat Z Saidpur Rangpur Shahebganj 5 Beldanga 0 Medical 0 5 Shapla 6 1 more 1 1 more 0 0 5 5 25 Ghagat Z 50 N517 Z Z Bridge Taxerhat N5 Mohiganj 1 2 Mordern 6 4 more 5 02 Z 8 5 Z Shampur 0 Modhupur Z 5 Parbatipur 50 N Sonapukur Badarganj 1 Chirirbandar Z5025 0 Ulipur Datbanga Govt Z5025 Pirgachha College R 5025 Simultala Laldangi 5 Z Kolahat Z 8 Kadamtali Biral Cantt.
  • Bangladesh and Bangladesh-U.S. Relations

    Bangladesh and Bangladesh-U.S. Relations

    Bangladesh and Bangladesh-U.S. Relations Updated October 17, 2017 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R44094 Bangladesh and Bangladesh-U.S. Relations Summary Bangladesh (the former East Pakistan) is a Muslim-majority nation in South Asia, bordering India, Burma, and the Bay of Bengal. It is the world’s eighth most populous country with nearly 160 million people living in a land area about the size of Iowa. It is an economically poor nation, and it suffers from high levels of corruption. In recent years, its democratic system has faced an array of challenges, including political violence, weak governance, poverty, demographic and environmental strains, and Islamist militancy. The United States has a long-standing and supportive relationship with Bangladesh, and it views Bangladesh as a moderate voice in the Islamic world. In relations with Dhaka, Bangladesh’s capital, the U.S. government, along with Members of Congress, has focused on a range of issues, especially those relating to economic development, humanitarian concerns, labor rights, human rights, good governance, and counterterrorism. The Awami League (AL) and the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) dominate Bangladeshi politics. When in opposition, both parties have at times sought to regain control of the government through demonstrations, labor strikes, and transport blockades, as well as at the ballot box. Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has been in office since 2009, and her AL party was reelected in January 2014 with an overwhelming majority in parliament—in part because the BNP, led by Khaleda Zia, boycotted the vote. The BNP has called for new elections, and in recent years, it has organized a series of blockades and strikes.
  • 2.Conference-APP Disaster Impact on Sundarbans

    2.Conference-APP Disaster Impact on Sundarbans

    IMPACT: International Journal of Research in Applied, Natural and Social Sciences (IMPACT: IJRANSS) ISSN(P): 2347-4580; ISSN(E): 2321-8851 Special Edition, Sep 2016, 5-12 © Impact Journals DISASTER IMPACT ON SUNDARBANS - A CASE STUDY ON SIDR AFFECTED AREA MOHAMMAD ZAKIR HOSSAIN KHAN Institute of Disaster Management and Vulnerability Studies, Dhaka University, Bangladesh ABSTRACT The primary indicators of environmental sustainability is the biodiversity and its conservation stated by Kates et al. (2001), whereas the assessment of biomass and floristic diversity in tropical forests has been identified as a priority by many international organizations stated by Stork et al. (1997). Cyclone ‘Sidr’, a tropical cyclone, was one of the biggest cyclones in the history of Bangladesh, formed in the central Bay of Bengal hit the coast of Bangladesh in 2007 and it made landfall on 15th of November with peaking wind speed of over 260 km/h. It resulted in an estimated 4,000 human deaths and the displacement of over 3 million people stated by US Embassy Dhaka (2007). The most significant devastating impact it left behind is on the diversity of flora of the Sundarbans. One quarter of the biomass cover (which is approximately 2500 sq. km) of the Sundarbans mangrove forest was damaged by the storm directly or indirectly due to the tidal surge stated by CEGIS (2007). The study shows that the total forest area damaged by the cyclone Sidr was about 21% of the Sundarbans. It was found that highly affected forest areas were dominated by Keora ( Sonneratia apetala ). Trees of Keora are comparatively taller more than 15 m and grow on newly accreted forest land.
  • Bangladesh – Hindus – Awami League – Bengali Language

    Bangladesh – Hindus – Awami League – Bengali Language

    Refugee Review Tribunal AUSTRALIA RRT RESEARCH RESPONSE Research Response Number: BGD30821 Country: Bangladesh Date: 8 November 2006 Keywords: Bangladesh – Hindus – Awami League – Bengali language This response was prepared by the Country Research Section of the Refugee Review Tribunal (RRT) after researching publicly accessible information currently available to the RRT within time constraints. This response is not, and does not purport to be, conclusive as to the merit of any particular claim to refugee status or asylum. Questions 1. Are Hindus a minority religion in Bangladesh? 2. How are religious minorities, notably Hindus, treated in Bangladesh? 3. Is the Awami League traditionally supported by the Hindus in Bangladesh? 4. Are Hindu supporters of the Awami League discriminated against and if so, by whom? 5. Are there parts of Bangladesh where Hindus enjoy more safety? 6. Is Bengali the language of Bangladeshis? RESPONSE 1. Are Hindus a minority religion in Bangladesh? Hindus constitute approximately 10 percent of the population in Bangladesh making them a religious minority. Sunni Muslims constitute around 88 percent of the population and Buddhists and Christians make up the remainder of the religious minorities. The Hindu minority in Bangladesh has progressively diminished since partition in 1947 from approximately 25 percent of the population to its current 10 percent (US Department of State 2006, International Religious Freedom Report for 2006 – Bangladesh, 15 September – Attachment 1). 2. How are religious minorities, notably Hindus, treated in Bangladesh? In general, minorities in Bangladesh have been consistently mistreated by the government and Islamist extremists. Specific discrimination against the Hindu minority intensified immediately following the 2001 national elections when the Bangladesh Nationalist Party (BNP) gained victory with its four-party coalition government, including two Islamic parties.
  • Esdo Profile 2021

    Esdo Profile 2021

    ECO-SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (ESDO) ESDO PROFILE 2021 Head Office Address: Eco-Social Development Organization (ESDO) Collegepara (Gobindanagar), Thakurgaon-5100, Thakurgaon, Bangladesh Phone:+88-0561-52149, +88-0561-61614 Fax: +88-0561-61599 Mobile: +88-01714-063360, +88-01713-149350 E-mail:[email protected], [email protected] Web: www.esdo.net.bd Dhaka Office: ESDO House House # 748, Road No: 08, Baitul Aman Housing Society, Adabar,Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh Phone: +88-02-58154857, Mobile: +88-01713149259, Email: [email protected] Web: www.esdo.net.bd 1 ECO-SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (ESDO) 1. BACKGROUND Eco-Social Development Organization (ESDO) has started its journey in 1988 with a noble vision to stand in solidarity with the poor and marginalized people. Being a peoples' centered organization, we envisioned for a society which will be free from inequality and injustice, a society where no child will cry from hunger and no life will be ruined by poverty. Over the last thirty years of relentless efforts to make this happen, we have embraced new grounds and opened up new horizons to facilitate the disadvantaged and vulnerable people to bring meaningful and lasting changes in their lives. During this long span, we have adapted with the changing situation and provided the most time-bound effective services especially to the poor and disadvantaged people. Taking into account the government development policies, we are currently implementing a considerable number of projects and programs including micro-finance program through a community focused and people centered approach to accomplish government’s development agenda and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the UN as a whole.
  • Esdo Profile

    Esdo Profile

    ECO-SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION (ESDO) ESDO PROFILE Head Office Address: Eco-Social Development Organization (ESDO) Collegepara (Gobindanagar), Thakurgaon-5100, Thakurgaon, Bangladesh Phone:+88-0561-52149, +88-0561-61614 Fax: +88-0561-61599 Mobile: +88-01714-063360, +88-01713-149350 E-mail:[email protected], [email protected] Web: www.esdo.net.bd Dhaka Office: ESDO House House # 748, Road No: 08, Baitul Aman Housing Society, Adabar,Dhaka-1207, Bangladesh Phone: +88-02-58154857, Mobile: +88-01713149259, Email: [email protected] Web: www.esdo.net.bd 1 Eco-Social Development Organization (ESDO) 1. Background Eco-Social Development Organization (ESDO) has started its journey in 1988 with a noble vision to stand in solidarity with the poor and marginalized people. Being a peoples' centered organization, we envisioned for a society which will be free from inequality and injustice, a society where no child will cry from hunger and no life will be ruined by poverty. Over the last thirty years of relentless efforts to make this happen, we have embraced new grounds and opened up new horizons to facilitate the disadvantaged and vulnerable people to bring meaningful and lasting changes in their lives. During this long span, we have adapted with the changing situation and provided the most time-bound effective services especially to the poor and disadvantaged people. Taking into account the government development policies, we are currently implementing a considerable number of projects and programs including micro-finance program through a community focused and people centered approach to accomplish government’s development agenda and Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the UN as a whole.
  • Climate Risk Vulnerability Assessment

    Climate Risk Vulnerability Assessment

    Dhaka and Western Zone Transmission Grid Expansion Project (RRP BAN 51137-003) Climate Risk and Vulnerability Assessment October 2019 Bangladesh: Dhaka and Western Zone Transmission Grid Expansion Project ABBREVIATIONS ADB - Asian Development Bank AR4 - Fourth Assessment Report AR5 - Fifth Assessment Report BCCRF - Bangladesh climate change resilience fund BCCSAP - Bangladesh Climate Change Strategy and Action Plan BPDB - Bangladesh Power Development Board CCVI - Climate Change Vulnerability Index CRVA - climate risk and vulnerability assessment DESCO - Dhaka Electricity Supply Company Limited DoE - Department of Environment DPDC - Dhaka Power Distribution Company DRM - disaster risk management DRR - disaster risk reduction DWZTGEP - Dhaka and Western Zone Transmission Grid Expansion Project GCMs - general circulation models GDP - gross domestic product GHG - greenhouse gas GOB - Government of Bangladesh IPCC - intergovernmental panel on climate change NAPA - National Adaptation Programme of Action NAP - National Adaptation Plan NGO - non-governmental organization PGCB - Power Grid Company of Bangladesh Limited RCP - representative concentration pathways SLR - sea level rise SST - sea surface temperature UNFCCC - United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change WB - World Bank WG - working group CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY I I. INTRODUCTION 1 A. About this Report 1 1. Overview 1 2. Scope of the Assessment 2 B. About the Concepts 2 1. Risk and Vulnerability 2 2. Climate Risk and Vulnerability on Energy Sector 3 C. Legislation Framework 3 1. Laws on Climate Change 4 2. National Plans, Programs and Initiatives 5 3. Local, State, and Regional Legislation and Initiatives 5 4. Government Documents 5 5. Additional Resources 5 6. Status under International Climate Change Law 5 II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION AND ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGY 7 A.
  • Chapter 1 Introduction Main Report CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

    Chapter 1 Introduction Main Report CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

    CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION Main Report Chapter 1 Introduction Main Report CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background of the Study The Peoples Republic of Bangladesh has a population of 123 million (as of June 1996) and a per capita GDP (Fiscal Year 1994/1995) of US$ 235.00. Of the 48 nations categorized as LLDC, Bangladesh is the most heavily populated. Even after gaining independence, the nation repeatedly suffers from floods, cyclones, etc.; 1/3 of the nation is inundated every year. Shortage in almost all sectors (e.g. development funds, infrastructure, human resources, natural resources, etc.) also leaves both urban and rural regions very underdeveloped. The supply of safe drinking water is an issue of significant importance to Bangladesh. Since its independence, the majority of the population use surface water (rivers, ponds, etc.) leading to rampancy in water-borne diseases. The combined efforts of UNICEF, WHO, donor countries and the government resulted in the construction of wells. At present, 95% of the national population depend on groundwater for their drinking water supply, consequently leading to the decline in the mortality rate caused by contagious diseases. This condition, however, was reversed in 1990 by problems concerning contamination brought about by high levels of arsenic detected in groundwater resources. Groundwater contamination by high arsenic levels was officially announced in 1993. In 1994, this was confirmed in the northwestern province of Nawabganji where arsenic poisoning was detected. In the province of Bengal, in the western region of the neighboring nation, India, groundwater contamination due to high arsenic levels has been a problem since the 1980s.
  • Status of Fish Species Diversity in Ghaghat River in Northern Bangladesh M

    Status of Fish Species Diversity in Ghaghat River in Northern Bangladesh M

    Ann.M. R. Bangladesh Islam, M. Das, Agric. M. (2018) N. Mondal 22 (1) and : 95-105 G. M. Mostakim ISSN 1025-482X (Print)95 2521-5477 (Online) STATUS OF FISH SPECIES DIVERSITY IN GHAGHAT RIVER IN NORTHERN BANGLADESH M. R. Islam1*, M. Das1, M. N. Mondal2 and G. M. Mostakim3 Abstract Fish species diversity and it’s conservation status of Ghaghat river in northern region of Bangladesh was investigated by field sampling using a taxonomic guide, FishBase data and International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) conservation index. The study revealed that a total of 55 species of fishes belonging to 45 genera, 22 families and 9 orders were found in the river. Among the identified fish orders, Cypriniformes was the highest diverse group with 34% species abundance followed by Siluriformes and Perciformes with 24% each. On the other hand, fishes under the orders Beloniformes, Decapoda, and Tetradontiformes were the least abundant (2%). Fish species diversity was found prominent during the monsoon. Based on IUCN conservation index 6(11%), 10(18%) and 7(13%) species in Ghaghat river were identified as critically endangered, endangered and vulnerable respectively. A total 14 types of fishing gear under 8 major groups were found to operate in the studied river, which included some banned gears like gill net and seine net. An effective conservation strategy needs to be developed to stop indiscriminate fishing and to conserve the fish biodiversity in Ghaghat river. Keywords: Fish, biodiversity, ghaghat river, conservation. Introduction barrages, pollution, using of banned fishing gears fish biodiversity is declining (Rahman Bangladesh is blessed with a large number et al., 2016).
  • A Baseline Survey on the Availability of Black Bengal Breeding Bucks in Different Districts of Bangladesh

    A Baseline Survey on the Availability of Black Bengal Breeding Bucks in Different Districts of Bangladesh

    J. Bangladesh Agril. Univ. 9(1): 91–96, 2011 ISSN 1810-3030 A baseline survey on the availability of Black Bengal breeding bucks in different districts of Bangladesh M. A. M. Y. Khandoker, A. S. Apu, S. S. Husain and D. R. Notter1 Department of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, Mymensingh-2202, Bangladesh 1Department of Animal and Poultry Sciences, Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University, USA Email: [email protected] Abstract The present study was conducted to assess the availability of Black Bengal breeding bucks in five districts from the Northern part (Lalmonirhat and Rangpur), Central part (Tangail and Mymensingh) and Southern part (Khulna) of Bangladesh and also to explore the relationship between distance of does from these breeding bucks and type of scarcity. The data were collected using a pre-tested questionnaire from 100 goat rearers of 100 villages in five districts. In this study, the selected characteristics of the respondents and other factors on the availability of Black Bengal breeding bucks were considered as independent variable whereas type of scarcity was considered as dependent variable. The buck and doe ratios were 1:164, 1:138, 1:114, 1:127 and 1:96 in Lalmonirhat, Rangpur, Tangail, Khulna and Mymensingh district, respectively. The pooled buck and doe ratio was 1:128. More than 70% farmers faced severe shortage of breeding bucks for serving their does in the above districts which ultimately represent the overall situation of the country. Almost all farmers (100%) had to depend on natural mating to serve their does except the farmers of Mymensingh where 12% farmers depended on artificial insemination in goat.
  • BANGLADESHTHE SHAHAR PROJECT IFPRI Is Collaborating with CARE-Bangladesh to Provide Research and Support for Its SHAHAR Project for Improving Urban Livelihoods

    BANGLADESHTHE SHAHAR PROJECT IFPRI Is Collaborating with CARE-Bangladesh to Provide Research and Support for Its SHAHAR Project for Improving Urban Livelihoods

    INTERNATIONAL FOOD POLICY RESEARCH INSTITUTE sustainable options for ending hunger and poverty BANGLADESHTHE SHAHAR PROJECT IFPRI is collaborating with CARE-Bangladesh to provide research and support for its SHAHAR project for improving urban livelihoods. he staggering growth of cities in developing countries Thas contributed to widespread urban poverty. Many of the urban poor live in unsanitary environments, have uncertain incomes, and lack necessary financial and health care services.These conditions exist in Bangladesh and appear likely to worsen.The populations of the cities in Bangladesh increase by more than 1 million every year. Many cities are growing at more than 8 percent per year, and they will double in size in less than 10 years. In 1997 CARE-Bangladesh undertook an assessment of the livelihood security of slum households in three cities in Bangladesh: Bogra, Khulna, and Tongi.Based on the findings of that study and a review of secondary literature, CARE- Bangladesh created the SHAHAR (Supporting Household James Garrett © IFPRI/ Activities for Hygiene, Assets, and Revenue) project. (Shahar means “city” in Bangla.) A component of the Integrated Food Security Program (IFSP) of CARE-Bangladesh, the RESEARCH FOCUS project was launched in mid-1999 and financed by the U.S. Project Leader: James Garrett Agency for International Development. IFPRI has provided research and technical assistance to help The SHAHAR project seeks to improve livelihood security CARE with SHAHAR’s program approach. IFPRI led baseline in some of the major secondary cities of Bangladesh.The surveys in the first two cities where SHAHAR worked, project’s major activities are: Jessore and Tongi.
  • European Journal of Geosciences - Vol

    European Journal of Geosciences - Vol

    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GEOSCIENCES - VOL. 02 ISSUE 01 PP. 19-29 (2020) European Academy of Applied and Social Sciences – www.euraass.com European Journal of Geosciences https://www.euraass.com/ejgs/ejgs.html Research Article Assessment of drought disaster risk in Boro rice cultivated areas of northwestern Bangladesh Rukaia-E-Amin Dinaa, Abu Reza Md. Towfiqul Islama* aDepartment of Disaster Management, Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur 5400, Bangladesh Received: 13 June 2019 / Revised: 16 October 2019 / Accepted: 12 January 2020 Abstract Drought risk has become a major threat for sustaining food security in Bangladesh; the particularly northwestern region of Bangladesh. The objective of the study is to assess drought disaster risk on Boro paddy cultivated areas of northwestern Bangladesh using drought disaster risk index (DDRI) model. The sensitivity of Boro paddy to droughts during crop-growing seasons and irrigation recoverability were employed to reflect vulnerability condition. Moreover, the threshold level of the standardized precipitation evapotranspiration index (SPEI) was applied to evaluate the drought hazard on Boro paddy cultivated areas in the northwestern region of Bangladesh. The probability density function (PDF) was used to show the threshold level of drought hazard. The results show that drought hazard is comparatively severe in Ishardi area compared to other northwestern regions of Bangladesh. The drought disaster risk is higher in Ishardi and Rajshahi areas than Rangpur and Dinajpur areas. Although Ishardi area is more prone to high drought risk, at the same time, the recoverability rate is also quicker than any other areas. The relationship between Boro rice yield rates and drought disaster risk is insignificant.