Flooding in North-Western Bangladesh
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
FLOODING IN NORTH‐WESTERN BANGLADESH HCTT JOINT NEEDS ASSESSMENT About this Report Nature of disaster: River and Monsoon Flooding Date of disaster: Initial reports from around the 15th August. JNA Triggered on the 19th August Location: North‐west districts of Lalmonirhat, Nilphamari, Kurigram, Rangpur, Gaibanda. Bogra, Sirajgonj, Jamalpur and Sherpur Assessment by: Multi‐stakeholder participation using the JNA format at Union level and secondary data review Date of Publication: FIRST DRAFT CIRCULATED 31.08.2014 THIS VERSION INCORMPORATING CLUSTER COMMENTS AND ANALYSIS 07.09.2014 Report prepared by: Multi‐stakeholder team Inquiries to: Abdul Wahed (CARE), Mahbub Rahman (CARE), Ahasanul Hoque (ACAPS), Liam Costello (FSC), Jenny Burley (SI) Sandie Walton‐Ellery (ACAPS) Cover photo Jafar Alam, Islamic Relief, Women in Dewanganj (used with their permission) Bangladesh, September 8, 2014 FINDINGS: Joint Needs Assessment: Flooding in north‐western Bangladesh – 08 September 2014 Page 1 CONTENTS 1. Overview of the situation and the disaster ........................................................................................... 6 2. Maps of the affected area ................................................................................................................... 10 3. Priorities reported at Union level ........................................................................................................ 11 3.1 Priorities for immediate assistance............................................................................................. 11 3.2 Need of external assistance for immediate support .................................................................. 12 3.2.1 Recovery Needs ...................................................................................................................... 13 4. Affected areas and populations ........................................................................................................... 14 5. Assessment Methodology ................................................................................................................... 15 5.1 Assessment Chronology .............................................................................................................. 17 5.2 The use of Union rather than Upazila information ..................................................................... 17 5.3 Limitations ................................................................................................................................... 17 5.4 Districts and Upazilas included in the assessment ..................................................................... 18 6. Findings by sector ................................................................................................................................ 20 6.1 WASH .......................................................................................................................................... 20 6.1.1 Water ...................................................................................................................................... 21 6.1.2 Sanitation ................................................................................................................................ 22 6.1.3 Hygiene ................................................................................................................................... 23 6.2 Food Security & Livelihoods ........................................................................................................ 24 6.2.1 Food Security .......................................................................................................................... 25 6.2.2 Livelihoods .............................................................................................................................. 26 6.2.3 Agriculture............................................................................................................................... 28 6.3 Shelter ......................................................................................................................................... 32 6.4 Education .................................................................................................................................... 38 6.5 Protection ................................................................................................................................... 42 6.6 Nutrition ...................................................................................................................................... 43 6.7 Health .......................................................................................................................................... 46 6.8 Accessibility to the affected areas .............................................................................................. 51 6.8.1 Accessibility ............................................................................................................................. 52 6.8.2 Communication ....................................................................................................................... 52 FINDINGS: Joint Needs Assessment: Flooding in north‐western Bangladesh – 08 September 2014 Pg2 ACRONYMS Acronym Expansion ACAPS The Assessment Capacities Project BDT Bangladesh Taka CFW Cash for Work CGI Corrugated Iron DAE Department of Agricultural Extension DLS Directorate of Livestock Services DMIC Disaster Management Information Committee EiE Education in Emergencies FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation FFW Food for Work FS Food Security GAM Global Acute Malnutrition GoB Government of Bangladesh Ha Hectare HCTT Humanitarian Coordination Task Team HH Household HtR Hard to Reach INGO‐ESG INGO Emergency Sub Group IPC Integrated Food Security Phase Classification JNA Joint Needs Assessment LCG DER Local Consultative Group for Disaster Emergency Response MoA Ministry of Agriculture MT Metric Tonne NAWG Needs Assessment Working Group NGO Non Government Organisation SAM Severe Acute Malnutrition Tk Taka ToR Terms of Reference ULO Upazila Livestock Officer UN United Nations WASH Water, sanitation and health WFP World Food Programme WHO World Health Organisation FINDINGS: Joint Needs Assessment: Flooding in north‐western Bangladesh – 08 September 2014 Pg3 HCTT JOINT NEEDS ASSESSMENT MONSOON AND RIVER FLOODING IN NORTH‐WESTERN BANGLADESH Report dated 8th September, 2014 ‐ based on data collected from the 25th ‐28th August and including input, comments and analysis received from stakeholders. No further versions or updates of this report are anticipated. KEY FINDINGS Almost 2 million people are affected in the nine districts assessed. By visiting officials at the Union level, the JNA found that 1,876,636 people were reported as affected – this is 33% of the population in the affected area. - 642,264 people affected in Kurigram (38% of the total population of the affected) - 423,679 people affected in Sirajgonj (43% of the total population of the district affected) - 338,459 people affected in Gaibandha (41% of the total population of the district affected) - 140,610 people affected in Jamalpur (29% of the total population of the district affected) - 111,239 people affected in Bogra (61% of the total population of the district affected) - 81,091 people affected in Lalmonirhat (11% of the total population of the district affected) - 64,603 people affected in Rangpur (19% of the total population of the district affected) - 50,876 people affected in Sherpur (26% of the total population of the district affected) - 23,815 people affected in Nilphamari (9% of the total population of the district affected) In terms of priority districts: - By percentage of the population affected, the districts of most concern are Bogra, Sirajgonj, and Gaibandha - Kurigram is a priority district because approximately 650,000 people are affected and reports indicate that over 120,000 people are presently displaced Based on female headed HHs comprising 7.8% of the total households in the area, it is estimated that 146,378 female headed households are affected. Overall, food is the first priority reported by Union officials The most impacted livelihood groups at this stage appear to be small and marginal farmers, and day labourers (agricultural and non‐agricultural). Other main reported needs include livelihoods, sanitation and water Although greater investigation is needed, present information indicates significant impact to standing crops which will impact agricultural labour, potentially extend the lean season and have “knock on” effects on food security1 Immediate food security has been severely affected and food stocks destroyed. A significant proportion of assessed unions of affected areas in Bogra, Sirajganj, Gaibandha, Jamalpur, Kurigram and Sherpur districts reported immediate relief needs and zero or inadequate resources available at union levels to manage the needs Union authorities report food, followed by sanitation and livelihoods as their main priorities for assistance DMIC reports that 153,337 houses are destroyed and/or damaged in the districts under consideration.2 As people return home and waters recede damage to houses is likely to become for evident and this number may increase 1 Informal information from agricultural experts indicates that the Aman crop is most likely lost and questions remain over the ability to plant the winter Boro crop. 2DMIC, Situation report, 4th September 2014. FINDINGS: Joint Needs Assessment: Flooding