The Big Ideas the Campaign the Vote
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Nominations Of: Ronald Sims, Fred P. Hochberg, Helen R
S. HRG. 111–173 NOMINATIONS OF: RONALD SIMS, FRED P. HOCHBERG, HELEN R. KANOVSKY, DAVID H. STEVENS, PETER KOVAR, JOHN D. TRASVIN˜A, AND DAVID S. COHEN HEARING BEFORE THE COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS UNITED STATES SENATE ONE HUNDRED ELEVENTH CONGRESS FIRST SESSION ON NOMINATIONS OF: RONALD SIMS, OF WASHINGTON, TO BE DEPUTY SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT FRED P. HOCHBERG, OF NEW YORK, TO BE PRESIDENT AND CHAIRMAN, EXPORT-IMPORT BANK HELEN R. KANOVSKY, OF MARYLAND, TO BE GENERAL COUNSEL, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DAVID H. STEVENS, OF VIRGINIA, TO BE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR HOUSING–FEDERAL HOUSING COMMISSIONER, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT PETER KOVAR, OF MARYLAND, TO BE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR CONGRESSIONAL AND INTERGOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT JOHN D. TRASVIN˜ A, OF CALIFORNIA, TO BE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR FAIR HOUSING AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY, DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT DAVID S. COHEN, OF MARYLAND, TO BE ASSISTANT SECRETARY FOR TERRORIST FINANCING, DEPARTMENT OF THE TREASURY APRIL 23, 2009 Printed for the use of the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs ( Available at: http://www.access.gpo.gov/congress/senate/senate05sh.html U.S. GOVERNMENT PRINTING OFFICE 53–677 PDF WASHINGTON : 2009 For sale by the Superintendent of Documents, U.S. Government Printing Office Internet: bookstore.gpo.gov Phone: toll free (866) 512–1800; DC area (202) 512–1800 Fax: (202) 512–2104 Mail: Stop IDCC, Washington, DC 20402–0001 COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS CHRISTOPHER J. DODD, Connecticut, Chairman TIM JOHNSON, South Dakota RICHARD C. -
Letter to the Democratic National Committee, the DNC Rules Committee, and All Delegates to the Democratic National Convention
Letter to the Democratic National Committee, the DNC Rules Committee, and all delegates to the Democratic National Convention: The undersigned organizations hope that all Democrats agree that the will of the voters should be decisive in determining the Democratic nominees for the country’s highest offices. We therefore urge the Democratic Party – via action at this month’s Democratic National Convention – to eliminate the concept of so-called “superdelegates.” This change would not impact the ongoing nomination proceedings, but would take effect for all future national nominee selection processes and conventions. The superdelegate system is unrepresentative, contradicts the purported values of the party and its members, and reduces the party’s moral authority. • The system undermines representative democracy and means that the electorate is not necessarily decisive in determining who will be the Democratic nominees for president and vice president and dilutes the voters’ say over the party’s platform and the rules under which it operates. Astonishingly, these unelected delegates have essentially as much weight as do the pledged delegates from the District of Columbia, 4 territories, and 24 states combined. • The system undermines the Democratic Party's commitment to gender equity. While the party’s charter rightfully mandates that equal numbers of pledged delegates be male and female, a near super-majority of superdelegates are men. • The Democratic Party prides itself on its commitment to racial justice and the racial diversity of its ranks. Yet the superdegelates appears to skew the party away from appropriate representation of communities of color: Proportionately, approximately 20% fewer of this year’s superdelegates hail from communities of color than was true of the 2008 and 2012 pledged delegate cohorts, or of the voters who supported President Obama in those years’ general elections. -
Event Report
ASEANAFFAIRS.ASEANAFFAIRS. COM PresentsPresents Save ur Planet KualaKuala Lumpur, Singapore, Ho Chi Minh City, Jakarta, India : comingcoming soon Get Details at www.aseanaffairs.comwww.aseanaffairs.com SAVE OUR PLANET 2 the Queen SirikitThursday, National March Convention 25, 2010, Center, Bangkok SAVE OUR PLANET 1 Friday, March 12, 2010, the Radisson Hotel, Sathorn, Bangkok Full Report inside Series of events being organized by Asean Affairs Business Council in South East Asia, India and China on Climate Change and what we in Asia can do to meet the challenges of Global Warming and reducing our carbon footprints A before it is too late. After the two hugely successful events in Bangkok in March 2010, the next events are being planned this year finally leading upto to a mega conference. To participate, sponsor or speak at our events and to receive the complete report of Save Our Planet 1 (SOP 1) and Save Our Planet 2 (Sop 2), please e-mail us at [email protected] Conference Partners ASEAN AFFAIRS Save Our Planet Report www.AseanAffairs.com/events/SOP1 1 ASEAN AFFAIRS Save Our Planet Report www.AseanAffairs.com/events/SOP1 2 SAVE OUR PLANET CONTENTS Save Our Planet 1 Foreword 3 Programme 4-5 Supported By 6-7 Biographies 8-9 Welcome Address 10-15 Presentations by Speakers (Summary) 16-18 Feed back 19 List of Participants 20-23 Save Our Planet 2 Programme 24-25 Supported By 26-27 Biographies 28-29 Welcome Address 30-33 ASEAN AFFAIRS Save Our Planet Report www.AseanAffairs.com/events/SOP1 www.AseanAffairs.com/events/SOP11 EVENTS s(ORASIS'LOBAL)NDIA Asean Leadership Forum 7th Asean Leadership Forum "USINESS-EETING *UNE !PRIL 3HERATON'RANDE3UKHUMVIT "ANGKOK +UALA,UMPUR -ALAYSIA *UNE sTH!SEAN,EADERSHIP &ORUM !PRIL s3!6%/520,!.%4 -ARCH s3!6%/520,!.%4 -ARCH s(ORASIS!NNUAL-EETING H.E. -
The Gulf Rising: Defense Industrialization In
Atlantic Council BRENT SCOWCROFT CENTER ON INTERNATIONAL SECURITY THE GULF RISING Defense Industrialization in Saudi Arabia and the UAE Bilal Y. Saab THE GULF RISING Defense Industrialization in Saudi Arabia and the UAE Bilal Y. Saab Resident Senior Fellow for Middle East Security Brent Scowcroft Center on International Security at the Atlantic Council © May 2014 The Atlantic Council of the United States. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission in writing from the Atlantic Council, except in the case of brief quotations in news articles, critical articles, or reviews. Please direct inquiries to: Atlantic Council 1030 15th Street NW, 12th Floor Washington, DC 20005 ISBN: 978-1-61977-055-3 Cover image: A visitor looks at a miniature model of a helicopter on display during the International Defense Exhibition and Conference (IDEX) at the Abu Dhabi National Exhibition Centre, February 18, 2013. Table of Contents Foreword ................................................................................................ 1 Executive Summary ..................................................................................... 2 The Author .............................................................................................. 6 Introduction ............................................................................................. 7 Motivations ............................................................................................. 9 Pillars ..................................................................................................13 -
Www. George Wbush.Com
Post Office Box 10648 Arlington, VA 2221 0 Phone. 703-647-2700 Fax: 703-647-2993 www. George WBush.com October 27,2004 , . a VIA FACSIMILE (202-219-3923) AND CERTIFIED MAIL == c3 F Federal Election Commission 999 E Street NW Washington, DC 20463 b ATTN: Office of General Counsel e r\, Re: MUR3525 Dear Federal Election Commission: On behalf of President George W. Bush and Vice President Richard B. Cheney as candidates for federal office, Karl Rove, David Herndon and Bush-Cheney ’04, Inc., this letter responds to the allegations contained in the complaint filed with the Federal Election Commission (the “Commission”) by Kerry-Edwards 2004, Inc. The Kerry Campaign’s complaint alleges that Bush-Cheney 2004 and fourteen other individuals and organizations violated the Federal Election Campaign Act of 197 1, as amended (2 U.S.C. $ 431 et seq.) (“the Act”). Specifically, the Kerry Campaign alleges that individuals and organizations named in the complaint illegally coordinated with one another to produce and air advertising about Senator. Kerry’s military service. 1 Considering that no entity by the name of Bush-Cheney 2004 appears to exist, 1’ Bush-Cheney ’04, Inc. (“Bush Campaign”) presumes that the Kerry Campaign mistakenly filed its complaint against a non-existent entity and actually intended to file against the Bush Campaign. Assuming that the foregoing presumption is correct; the Bush Campaign, on behalf of itself and President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. Cheney, Karl Rove, David Herndon (the “Parties”), responds as follows: Response to Allegations Against President George W. Bush, Vice President Richard B. -
Questionnaire for Voters on Presidential Primary
YOUR ANSWERS ARE CONFIDENTIAL Please check only ONE response for each question. VERSION 2 [A] Are you: [G] To which age group do you belong? 1 Male 2 Female 1 18-24 4 40-44 7 60-64 2 25-29 5 45-49 8 65-74 [B] Are you: 3 30-39 6 50-59 9 75 or over 1 White 4 Asian 2 Black 5 Other [H] Which ONE candidate quality mattered 3 Hispanic/Latino most in deciding how you voted today? (Check only one) [C] In today's Democratic presidential 1 He cares about people like me primary, did you just vote for: 2 He stands up for what he believes 1 Wesley Clark 3 He has the right experience 2 Howard Dean 4 He can defeat George W. Bush 3 John Edwards 5 He has a positive message 4 John Kerry 6 He would shake things up in Washington 5 Dennis Kucinich 7 He is a loyal Democrat 6 Joe Lieberman 7 Al Sharpton [I] Is your opinion of Wesley Clark: 9 Other: Who?_____________________________ 1 Favorable 0 Did not vote 2 Unfavorable [D] When did you finally decide for whom to vote in the presidential primary? [J] Is your opinion of Howard Dean: 1 Favorable 1 In the last three days 2 Unfavorable 2 In the last week 3 In the last month [K] Is your opinion of John Edwards: 4 Before that 1 Favorable [E] Which comes closest to your feelings 2 Unfavorable about the Bush administration: 1 Angry [L] Is your opinion of John Kerry: 1 Favorable 2 Dissatisfied, but not angry 3 Satisfied, but not enthusiastic 2 Unfavorable 4 Enthusiastic [M] Is your opinion of Joe Lieberman: [F] Are you of Hispanic or Latino descent? 1 Favorable 1 Yes 2 No 2 Unfavorable PLEASE TURN THE QUESTIONNAIRE -
Presidential Nominating Process: Current Issues
Presidential Nominating Process: Current Issues -name redacted- Analyst in Elections February 27, 2012 Congressional Research Service 7-.... www.crs.gov RL34222 CRS Report for Congress Prepared for Members and Committees of Congress Presidential Nominating Process: Current Issues Summary After a period of uncertainty over the presidential nominating calendar for 2012, the early states again settled on January dates for primaries and caucuses. Iowa held its caucuses on January 3 and New Hampshire held its primary on January 10. These two states, along with South Carolina and Nevada, are exempt from Republican national party rules that do not permit delegate selection contests prior to the first Tuesday in March, but specify that these contests may not be held before February 1. Officials in Florida announced that the state would hold a January 31, 2012, primary, in violation of party rules, which prompted South Carolina and Nevada to schedule unsanctioned events as well. South Carolina scheduled its primary on January 21; Nevada Republicans originally scheduled party caucuses for January 14, but changed the date to February 4. States that violate the rules risk losing half their delegates, as a number of states already have. Every four years, the presidential nominating process generates complaints and proposed modifications, often directed at the seemingly haphazard and fast-paced calendar of primaries and caucuses. The rapid pace of primaries and caucuses that characterized the 2000 and 2004 cycles continued in 2008, despite national party efforts to reverse front-loading. The Democratic Party approved changes to its calendar rules in July 2006, when the party’s Rules and Bylaws Committee extended an exemption to Nevada and South Carolina (Iowa and New Hampshire were previously exempted) from the designated period for holding delegate selection events; and the committee proposed sanctions for any violations. -
The Iranian Sea-Air-Missile Threat to Gulf Shipping
burke chair in strategy The Iranian Sea-Air-Missile Threat to Gulf Shipping By Anthony H. Cordesman August 14, 2014 with the assistance of Aaron Lin Request for comments: This draft has been prepared for the Arab Center for Research and Policy Studies conference on Arab-U.S. Relations in Doha in June 2014, and is being circulated for comments and suggestions. Please provide them to [email protected]. ANTHONY H. CORDESMAN Arleigh A. Burke Chair in Strategy [email protected] Cordesman-Lin: Iranian Danger to Maritime Traffic August 2014 2 Table of Contents I. THE ROLE OF ENERGY EXPORTS IN DETERMINING THE IMPORTANCE OF THE IRANIAN THREAT .................................................................................................................................... 5 THE GROWING GLOBAL IMPORTANCE OF MARITIME TRAFFIC TO AND FROM THE GULF .......................... 6 CHOKEPOINTS AND THE BROADER MARITIME THREAT ................................................................................... 9 POTENTIAL GLOBAL AND US IMPACTS .............................................................................................................. 10 THE IRANIAN MARITIME THREAT TO IRAN ...................................................................................................... 11 II. THE STRENGTHS AND WEAKNESSES OF IRAN’S NAVAL FORCES .................................... 17 THE RANGE OF MARITIME THREATS ................................................................................................................. 17 Submarines ............................................................................................................................................................. -
Chasing Success
AIR UNIVERSITY AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE Chasing Success Air Force Efforts to Reduce Civilian Harm Sarah B. Sewall Air University Press Air Force Research Institute Maxwell Air Force Base, Alabama Project Editor Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Dr. Ernest Allan Rockwell Sewall, Sarah B. Copy Editor Carolyn Burns Chasing success : Air Force efforts to reduce civilian harm / Sarah B. Sewall. Cover Art, Book Design and Illustrations pages cm L. Susan Fair ISBN 978-1-58566-256-2 Composition and Prepress Production 1. Air power—United States—Government policy. Nedra O. Looney 2. United States. Air Force—Rules and practice. 3. Civilian war casualties—Prevention. 4. Civilian Print Preparation and Distribution Diane Clark war casualties—Government policy—United States. 5. Combatants and noncombatants (International law)—History. 6. War victims—Moral and ethical aspects. 7. Harm reduction—Government policy— United States. 8. United States—Military policy— Moral and ethical aspects. I. Title. II. Title: Air Force efforts to reduce civilian harm. UG633.S38 2015 358.4’03—dc23 2015026952 AIR FORCE RESEARCH INSTITUTE AIR UNIVERSITY PRESS Director and Publisher Allen G. Peck Published by Air University Press in March 2016 Editor in Chief Oreste M. Johnson Managing Editor Demorah Hayes Design and Production Manager Cheryl King Air University Press 155 N. Twining St., Bldg. 693 Maxwell AFB, AL 36112-6026 [email protected] http://aupress.au.af.mil/ http://afri.au.af.mil/ Disclaimer Opinions, conclusions, and recommendations expressed or implied within are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official policy or position of the organizations with which they are associated or the views of the Air Force Research Institute, Air University, United States Air Force, Department of Defense, or any AFRI other US government agency. -
Completeboardpackets
BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING September 19-20, 2013 Omni Fort Worth Hotel 1300 Houston Street Fort Worth, TX (817)535-6664 http://www.omnihotels.com/FindAHotel/FortWorth.aspx NOTE: Assigned rooms subject to change, so please consult event monitors throughout hotel. In order to accommodate early flight departures, the meeting will adjourn promptly at 12 noon with no lunch provided. Thursday, September 19, 2013 MEETING ROOMS 300 – 5:00 PM Legislative Action Council (LAC) Stockyards 2 (LAC Members ONLY) (2nd Floor) 5:00 – 6:30 PM Welcome Reception Sundance II (3rd Floor) Friday, September 20, 2013 8:00 AM – 12:00 PM Board of Trustees Meeting Stockyards 1 (2nd Floor) BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING Friday, September 20, 2013 8:30 AM – 12:00 PM Omni Fort Worth Hotel (1300 Houston Street) Room: Stockyards 1 Fort Worth, Texas AGENDA TOPICS WELCOME DAVID ICKERT SECRETARY’S REPORT MIKE MITTERNIGHT 1) Approve Minutes of 6/18/2013 Board Meeting TREASURER’S REPORT TIM REYNOLDS 1) Updated Financials a) Income Statement b) Balance Sheet CHAIR’S REPORT DAVID ICKERT 1) Executive Committee STRATEGIC PLANNING COMMITTEE LARRY NANNIS NOMINATING COMMITTEE CHRIS HOLMAN ADVOCACY COOKIE DRISCOLL 1) Tax Policy 2) Economic Development 3) Environment and Regulatory Affairs 4) Health and Human Resources 5) Other Issues September 2013 NSBA Board Packet 2 Back to Agenda BOARD AGENDA PAGE 2 COMMUNICATIONS PEDRO ALFONSO 1) Media 2) Surveys and Mid-Year Economic Report 3) Communications Audit & Membership Survey MEMBERSHIP 1) Small Business Leadership Council ERIC TOLBERT a) Draft PowerPoint Presentation 2) New Health Program: TABS 3) Membership Update SMALL BUSINESS TECHNOLOGY COUNCIL JERE GLOVER SMALL BUSINESS EXPORTERS ASSOCIATION DAVID ICKERT COUNCIL OF REGIONAL EXECUTIVES ROB FOWLER OTHER BUSINESS ADJOURN September 2013 NSBA Board Packet 3 Back to Agenda MINUTES OF THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES MEETING June 18, 2013 Westin City Center Washington, D.C. -
Diplomatic and Consular List
DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR LIST December 2020 DEPARTMENT OF PROTOCOL MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS BANGKOK It is requested that amendment be reported without delay to the Protocol Division, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Email: [email protected] This list is up-to-date at the time of editing. There are inevitably frequent changes and amendments. The information on (a) “Order of Precedence” is as of 8 December 2020 (b) “Diplomatic Missions” as received on 5 December 2020 (c) “Consular Representatives” “Consular Representatives (Honorary)” “United Nations Organizations” and “International Organizations” are as of 8 December 2020. Spelling of districts, sub-districts, and provinces is defined by the Office of the Royal Society. CONTENTS Order of Precedence of Heads of Missions ............................................................................... 1 - 8 Diplomatic Missions ............................................................................................................. 9 - 241 Consular Representatives .................................................................................................. 242 - 260 Consular Representatives (Honorary) ............................................................................... 261 - 377 United Nations Organizations ........................................................................................... 378 - 401 International Organizations ............................................................................................... 402 - 416 Public Holidays for 2020 -
A Tale of Two Manuals
A Tale of Two Manuals BY RAPHAEL S. COHEN n January 13, 2009, in the waning days of the George W. Bush administration, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates, and U.S. Agency for O International Development (USAID) Administrator Henrietta Fore unveiled the U.S. Government Counterinsurgency Guide. The guide was the first of its kind—an attempt at an inter- agency doctrine reaching across civilian and military agencies in the U.S. Government. It sought to create unifying principles for the counterinsurgency fight and to unite the involved agencies through a common game plan to “achieve synergy among political, security, economic and informa- tion activities.”1 Coordinated by the Bureau of Political-Military Affairs at the Department of State, the guide was coauthored by all the major government stakeholders in the counterinsurgency fight: USAID; the Departments of State, Defense, Justice, Treasury, Homeland Security, Transportation, and Agriculture; and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence. Moreover, the guide’s creation brought together some of the leading counterinsurgency strategists from across the U.S. Government and drew upon current experience. Seemingly, the finished product was well poised to shape the way the U.S. Government thinks about and conducts counterinsurgencies. And yet, more than a year and a half after its publication, the guide has languished in relative obscurity with little apparent impact on interagency planning, strategy, or operations in Iraq and Afghanistan or elsewhere. The result is particularly surprising in historical context, given the great success of two other doctrinal guides in shaping counterinsurgency strategic thought.