Dark Matter Annihilation in $\Omega $ Centauri: Astrophysical Implications

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Dark Matter Annihilation in $\Omega $ Centauri: Astrophysical Implications Dark matter annihilation in ! Centauri: astrophysical implications derived from the MWA radio data Arpan Kara,∗, Biswarup Mukhopadhyayab, Steven Tingayc, Ben McKinleyc,d, Marijke Haverkorne, Sam McSweeneyc, Natasha Hurley-Walkerc, Sourav Mitraf, Tirthankar Roy Choudhuryg aRegional Centre for Accelerator-based Particle Physics, Harish-Chandra Research Institute, HBNI, Chhatnag Road, Jhunsi, Allahabad - 211 019, India bIndian Institute of Science Education and Research Kolkata, Mohanpur, West Bengal 741246, India cInternational Centre for Radio Astronomy Research, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia dARC Centre of Excellence for All Sky Astrophysics in 3 Dimensions (ASTRO 3D), Bentley, Australia eDepartment of Astrophysics/IMAPP, Radboud University, P.O. Box 9010, 6500 GL Nijmegen, The Netherlands fSurendranath College, 24/2 M. G. ROAD, Kolkata, West Bengal 700009, India gNational Centre for Radio Astrophysics, TIFR, Post Bag 3, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411007, India Abstract We present an analysis of Murchison Widefield Array radio telescope data from ! Cen, possibly a stripped dwarf spheroidal galaxy core captured by our Galaxy. Recent interpretations of Fermi-LAT γ-ray data by Brown et al. (2019) and Reynoso-Cordova et al. (2019) suggest that ! Cen may contain significant Dark Matter. We utilise their best-fit Dark Matter annihilation models, and an estimate of the magnetic field strength in ! Cen, to calculate the expected radio synchrotron signal from annihilation, and show that one can usefully rule out significant parts of the magnetic field - diffusion coefficient plane using our current observational limits on the radio emission. Improvement by a factor of 10-100 on these limits could constrain the models even more tightly. Keywords: ! Cen, γ-ray, Dark matter annihilation, Radio observation, MWA 1. Introduction the MWA [2] and the Giant Metre-wave Radio Telescope (GMRT [3]) to place limits on diffuse synchrotron emission ! Cen is possibly a stripped dwarf spheroidal galaxy from these galaxies for various models. While this repre- core captured by our Galaxy, in which the dark matter sented a significant step toward much deeper observations (DM) density may be high. Two groups have recently by the future Square Kilometre Array (SKA) [4, 5, 6, 7], analysed the γ-ray data from Fermi-LAT for this object, the results placed only limited constraints on DM models. to suggest best-fit values of the DM mass and annihilation Similar results have recently been reported by a team us- rates in various dominant channels. We take advantage ing another low frequency interferometer, LOFAR, for the of the proximity of ! Cen and calculate the expected ra- dSph galaxy Canes Venatici I [8]. One fundamental factor dio synchrotron surface brightness arising from DM anni- affecting our previous results and the LOFAR results is, of hilation in the ambient magnetic field, corresponding to course, the large distances to dSph galaxies. each of the fits. In each case, Murchison Widefield Array (MWA) data constrain the magnetic field - diffusion co- efficient plane for ! Cen. It is of particular significance 2. Observations of Omega Centauri (! Cen) that some knowledge of the magnetic field is used here A case has been recently made by Ref. [9] and Ref. [10] to constrain the diffusion coefficient, which is difficult to that ! Cen, historically classified as the largest globular estimate. arXiv:2005.11962v2 [astro-ph.HE] 17 Jul 2020 cluster associated with our Galaxy, is the captured and Previously we have reported the results of the first low stripped core of a dSph galaxy and has a significant DM radio frequency search for the synchrotron emission sig- component to its mass. These characteristics potentially nal expected from some DM annihilation models [1]. Such make ! Cen a suitable object for studying DM annihilation radio signals arise from electrons and positrons, produced models, since it is only 5.4 kpc from the Earth. in DM annihilation cascades, undergoing cycloidal motion Ref. [9] and Ref. [10] analyze the Fermi-LAT data in the ambient magnetic field. We targeted 14 DM-rich on γ-ray emission from the direction of ! Cen and claim dwarf spheroidal (dSph) galaxies using observations from consistency of the signal with DM annihilation. Ref. [9] claims the best fit to be mDM = 31±4 GeV and a velocity- 3 −1 ∗Corresponding author averaged annihilation cross-section of log10[hσvi (cm s )] = 0:6 ¯ Email address: [email protected] (Arpan Kar) −28:2±1:2, with bb as the principal annihilation channel. Preprint submitted to Elsevier July 20, 2020 The fit by Ref. [10], on the other hand, favours mDM = 0:69 2 −2 −1 9:1±0:62 GeV and log10[hσviJ (GeV cm s )] = −5:5 ± 0:09 47.1 0:03 for the qq¯ channel, or mDM = 4:3±0:08 GeV and 0.2 2 −2 −1 + − log10[hσviJ (GeV cm s )] = −4:34 ± 0:03) for a µ µ 47.2 0.1 channel. These best-fit values assume that the γ-ray signal 47.3 from ! Cen is arising solely due to DM annihilation. Since 47.4 our emphasis is on the corresponding radio synchrotron 0.0 47.5 signals, we have used this at face value. Jy/beam Dec (degrees) No obvious populations of conventional high energy as- 47.6 0.1 trophysical objects are known to be associated with ! Cen 47.7 to readily explain the γ-ray emission, although a more 47.8 0.2 comprehensive examination of possible high energy pho- 13.47 13.46 13.45 13.44 13.43 ton sources is clearly required. For example, Ref. [11] RA (hours) find 30 objects in ! Cen with X-ray luminosities and col- ors consistent with a millisecond pulsar interpretation and Figure 1: Difference image for ! Cen using MWA and TGSS ADR1 data. The blue circle denotes the optical half-light diameter for ! suggest that these objects could be the source of the γ-ray Cen. emission seen with Fermi-LAT. In order to predict synchrotron emission due to DM annihilation, the ambient magnetic field strength is an im- trophysical parameters in Omega Centauri. While models portant parameter. The determination of magnetic field differing from those in Ref. [9] and Ref. [10] can certainly strength in dSph galaxies is not straightforward. However, be there, our approach can be used to predict and analyse measurements of the magnetic field in globular clusters are the concomitantly altered radio synchrotron flux for each possible through the observation of pulsars, in particular of them. Thus the adherence to particular models used in via measurement of their dispersion measure and rotation the recent literature enables us to lay out a general prin- measure. For example, Ref. [12] find evidence for mag- ciple. netic fields possibly as high as 200 µG in the globular cluster 47 Tucanae. While a similar analysis is not cur- 3. Radio data analysis rently possible for ! Cen (no pulsars are known in ! Cen), approximate estimates of its magnetic field strength are Following Ref. [1], we produce an image for ! Cen possible by virtue of its location within our Galaxy. that represents only extended, diffuse radio emission at 200 Using the best-fit DM annihilation models, suggested MHz, via the difference between an MWA image (sensitive by Ref. [9] and Ref. [10] noted above (obtained by using to diffuse emission) and an image from the GMRT TGSS the best-fit J-factor, as explained later in this paper), the ADR1 (sensitive to compact emission). ! Cen is located proximity of ! Cen, and the prospect of independently es- close to the powerful radio galaxy Centaurus A (Cen A) timating the magnetic field strength within ! Cen (as out- and the MWA GLEAM data utilised in Ref. [1] cannot be lined below), we re-visit the techniques used in our previ- utilised here, the reason being the difficulties of producing ous work to compute the corresponding radio synchrotron high quality images in the vicinity of extremely bright and annihilation signals at low frequencies. The reader is re- complex objects such as Cen A. Thus, for ! Cen, we utilise ferred to Ref. [1] for the details of our observational ap- MWA images that were produced specifically for Cen A, proach, a summary of the relevant literature, and our re- by [13]. We note that the GMRT data for ! Cen are not sults for dSph galaxies. Finally, we compare our radio data affected by Cen A in the same way that the MWA data are, with the theoretical expectations. due to the fact that the GMRT field of view is far smaller As has been mentioned above, our emphasis is on the than the MWA field of view, meaning that the structure of correlation between gamma-ray and radio signals from a Cen A that challenges MWA imaging is greatly attenuated nearby globular cluster like Omega Centauri. The new by the primary beam response of the GMRT. step that we take in this study is the calculation of the ra- The difference image resulting from our analysis of the dio flux for the same dark matter profile(s), based on which MWA data from Ref. [13] and the GMRT TGSS ADR1 gamma-ray data have been interpreted, and its compari- data of [3] is shown in Figure 1. son with the MWA data. Thus [9] and [10] serve as our While the images of the Cen A region by [13] are of reference models for gamma-ray emission from dark mat- a very high quality, imaging artefacts at a low level are ter annihilation in Omega Centauri. Going beyond them still apparent in Figure 1. These artefacts are in the form in a study like this would have taken us to territories where of radial stripes that originate near the peak intensity re- the aforementioned correlation would be impossible.
Recommended publications
  • Arxiv:1910.11169V1 [Astro-Ph.EP] 24 Oct 2019 Metchev Et Al.(2004) Due to the Detection of a Strong Mid- Tinuum and at HCO+ and CO Gas Emission Lines
    Astronomy & Astrophysics manuscript no. PDS70_v2 c ESO 2019 October 25, 2019 VLT/SPHERE exploration of the young multiplanetary system PDS70? D. Mesa1, M. Keppler2, F. Cantalloube2, L. Rodet3, B. Charnay4, R. Gratton1, M. Langlois5; 6, A. Boccaletti4, M. Bonnefoy3, A. Vigan6, O. Flasseur7, J. Bae8, M. Benisty3; 9, G. Chauvin3; 9, J. de Boer10, S. Desidera1, T. Henning2, A.-M. Lagrange3, M. Meyer11, J. Milli12, A. Müller2, B. Pairet13, A. Zurlo14; 15; 6, S. Antoniucci16, J.-L. Baudino17, S. Brown Sevilla2, E. Cascone18, A. Cheetham19, R.U. Claudi1, P. Delorme3, V. D’Orazi1, M. Feldt2, J. Hagelberg19, M. Janson20, Q. Kral4, E. Lagadec21, C. Lazzoni1, R. Ligi22, A.-L. Maire2; 23, P. Martinez21, F. Menard3, N. Meunier3, C. Perrot4; 24; 25, S. Petrus3, C. Pinte26; 3, E.L. Rickman19, S. Rochat3, D. Rouan4, M. Samland2; 20, J.-F. Sauvage27; 6, T. Schmidt4; 28, S. Udry19, L. Weber19, F. Wildi19 (Affiliations can be found after the references) Received / accepted ABSTRACT Context. PDS 70 is a young (5.4 Myr), nearby (∼113 pc) star hosting a known transition disk with a large gap. Recent observations with SPHERE and NACO in the near-infrared (NIR) allowed us to detect a planetary mass companion, PDS 70 b, within the disk cavity. Moreover, observations in Hα with MagAO and MUSE revealed emission associated to PDS 70 b and to another new companion candidate, PDS 70 c, at a larger separation from the star. PDS 70 is the only multiple planetary system at its formation stage detected so far through direct imaging. Aims. Our aim is to confirm the discovery of the second planet PDS 70 c using SPHERE at VLT, to further characterize its physical properties, and search for additional point sources in this young planetary system.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue 59, Yir 2015
    1 Director’s Message 50 Fast Turnaround Program Markus Kissler-Patig Pilot Underway Rachel Mason 3 Probing Time Delays in a Gravitationally Lensed Quasar 54 Base Facility Operations Keren Sharon Gustavo Arriagada 7 GPI Discovers the Most Jupiter-like 58 GRACES: The Beginning of a Exoplanet Ever Directly Detected Scientific Legacy Julien Rameau and Robert De Rosa André-Nicolas Chené 12 First Likely Planets in a Nearby 62 The New Cloud-based Gemini Circumbinary Disk Observatory Archive Valerie Rapson Paul Hirst 16 RCW 41: Dissecting a Very Young 65 Solar Panel System Installed at Cluster with Adaptive Optics Gemini North Benoit Neichel Alexis-Ann Acohido 21 Science Highlights 67 Gemini Legacy Image Releases Nancy A. Levenson Gemini staff contributions 30 On the Horizon 72 Journey Through the Universe Gemini staff contributions Janice Harvey 37 News for Users 75 Viaje al Universo Gemini staff contributions Maria-Antonieta García 46 Adaptive Optics at Gemini South Gaetano Sivo, Vincent Garrel, Rodrigo Carrasco, Markus Hartung, Eduardo Marin, Vanessa Montes, and Chad Trujillo ON THE COVER: GeminiFocus January 2016 A montage featuring GeminiFocus is a quarterly publication a recent Flamingos-2 of the Gemini Observatory image of the galaxy 670 N. A‘ohoku Place, Hilo, Hawai‘i 96720, USA NGC 253’s inner region Phone: (808) 974-2500 Fax: (808) 974-2589 (as discussed in the Science Highlights Online viewing address: section, page 21; with www.gemini.edu/geminifocus an inset showing the Managing Editor: Peter Michaud stellar supercluster Science Editor: Nancy A. Levenson identified as the galaxy’s nucleus) Associate Editor: Stephen James O’Meara and cover pages Designer: Eve Furchgott/Blue Heron Multimedia from each of issue of Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or GeminiFocus in 2015.
    [Show full text]
  • The Nearest Stars: a Guided Tour by Sherwood Harrington, Astronomical Society of the Pacific
    www.astrosociety.org/uitc No. 5 - Spring 1986 © 1986, Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 390 Ashton Avenue, San Francisco, CA 94112. The Nearest Stars: A Guided Tour by Sherwood Harrington, Astronomical Society of the Pacific A tour through our stellar neighborhood As evening twilight fades during April and early May, a brilliant, blue-white star can be seen low in the sky toward the southwest. That star is called Sirius, and it is the brightest star in Earth's nighttime sky. Sirius looks so bright in part because it is a relatively powerful light producer; if our Sun were suddenly replaced by Sirius, our daylight on Earth would be more than 20 times as bright as it is now! But the other reason Sirius is so brilliant in our nighttime sky is that it is so close; Sirius is the nearest neighbor star to the Sun that can be seen with the unaided eye from the Northern Hemisphere. "Close'' in the interstellar realm, though, is a very relative term. If you were to model the Sun as a basketball, then our planet Earth would be about the size of an apple seed 30 yards away from it — and even the nearest other star (alpha Centauri, visible from the Southern Hemisphere) would be 6,000 miles away. Distances among the stars are so large that it is helpful to express them using the light-year — the distance light travels in one year — as a measuring unit. In this way of expressing distances, alpha Centauri is about four light-years away, and Sirius is about eight and a half light- years distant.
    [Show full text]
  • The Radio Continuum View of Centaurus Acentaurus A
    TheThe radioradio continuumcontinuum viewview ofof CentaurusCentaurus AA Ron Ekers CSIRO The Many Faces of Centaurus A Sydney, 29 June 2009 Ilana's composite Morganti et al. 1999 9° 10' Burns et al. xx image courtesy Norbert Junkes (MPIfR) WhyWhy CentaurusCentaurus AA isis specialspecial ■ the first extragalactic radio source ■ the brightest source in the Southern Hemisphere ■ the second double lobed source discovered ± after Cygnus A ■ the closest Radio Galaxy ■ the closest AGN ■ the closest SMBH ± VLBI resolution 0.01pc, 100 Rs ■ A spectacular galaxy EvolutionEvolution ofof thethe ModelsModels ■ Radio sources ± Static magnetic field 1960 ± Evolutionary sequence 1970 ± Continuous injection ± Continuous reacceleration ■ Energy source ± Galaxy collisions 1950's ± Nuclear accretions 1960- ± Accretion triggered by collisions 1980- CentaurusCentaurus AA thethe closestclosest AGNAGN ■ Distance 3.4Mpc ■ Next closest comparable AGN M87 17Mpc ! ■ Average distance to a L=1024 W Hz-1 radio galaxies ± 10Mpc ± So we are lucky (or influenced!) ■ Much easier to study at all wavelengths ■ Subtends a large angular size ± Good linear resolution ± Background probes SomeSome RadioRadio GalaxiesGalaxies Name Size Log Log (kpc) Luminosity Energy (ergs sec-1) (ergs) Centaurus A 470 41.7 59.9 Cygnus A 200 45.2 60.6 M87 80 42.0 58.6 M82 1 39.5 55.2 PolarizationPolarization inin CentaurusCentaurus AA Bracewell 1962 ■ April 1962 ■ Parkes 64m just completed ■ Discovered by Bracewell ± Published Cooper and Price ± Visitors Log ± Not a National Facilities yet! ■ Connie
    [Show full text]
  • TESS Discovery of a Super-Earth and Three Sub-Neptunes Hosted by the Bright, Sun-Like Star HD 108236
    Swarthmore College Works Physics & Astronomy Faculty Works Physics & Astronomy 2-1-2021 TESS Discovery Of A Super-Earth And Three Sub-Neptunes Hosted By The Bright, Sun-Like Star HD 108236 T. Daylan K. Pinglé J. Wright M. N. Günther K. G. Stassun Follow this and additional works at: https://works.swarthmore.edu/fac-physics See P nextart of page the forAstr additionalophysics andauthors Astr onomy Commons Let us know how access to these works benefits ouy Recommended Citation T. Daylan, K. Pinglé, J. Wright, M. N. Günther, K. G. Stassun, S. R. Kane, A. Vanderburg, D. Jontof-Hutter, J. E. Rodriguez, A. Shporer, C. X. Huang, T. Mikal-Evans, M. Badenas-Agusti, K. A. Collins, B. V. Rackham, S. N. Quinn, R. Cloutier, K. I. Collins, P. Guerra, Eric L.N. Jensen, J. F. Kielkopf, B. Massey, R. P. Schwarz, D. Charbonneau, J. J. Lissauer, J. M. Irwin, Ö Baştürk, B. Fulton, A. Soubkiou, B. Zouhair, S. B. Howell, C. Ziegler, C. Briceño, N. Law, A. W. Mann, N. Scott, E. Furlan, D. R. Ciardi, R. Matson, C. Hellier, D. R. Anderson, R. P. Butler, J. D. Crane, J. K. Teske, S. A. Shectman, M. H. Kristiansen, I. A. Terentev, H. M. Schwengeler, G. R. Ricker, R. Vanderspek, S. Seager, J. N. Winn, J. M. Jenkins, Z. K. Berta-Thompson, L. G. Bouma, W. Fong, G. Furesz, C. E. Henze, E. H. Morgan, E. Quintana, E. B. Ting, and J. D. Twicken. (2021). "TESS Discovery Of A Super-Earth And Three Sub-Neptunes Hosted By The Bright, Sun-Like Star HD 108236".
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:2007.04823V1 [Astro-Ph.HE] 9 Jul 2020 Inverse Compton-CMB Models , Although Other Evidence Seems to Be Compatible With
    Title: Resolving acceleration to very high energies along the Jet of Centaurus A Author: The H.E.S.S. Collaboration Correspondence to: [email protected] The full author list with affiliations can be found at the end of this paper Summary: The nearby radio galaxy Centaurus A belongs to a class of Active Galaxies that are very luminous at radio wavelengths. The majority of these galaxies show collimated relativistic outflows known as jets, that extend over hundreds of thousands of parsecs for the most powerful sources. Accretion of matter onto the central super-massive black hole is be- lieved to fuel these jets and power their emission 1, with the radio emission being related to the synchrotron radiation of relativistic electrons in magnetic fields. The origin of the extended X-ray emission seen in the kiloparsec-scale jets from these sources is still a mat- ter of debate, although Centaurus A’s X-ray emission has been suggested to originate in electron synchrotron processes 2–4. The other possible explanation is inverse Compton scat- tering with CMB soft photons 5–7. Synchrotron radiation needs ultra-relativistic electrons (∼ 50 TeV), and given their short cooling times, requires some continuous re-acceleration mechanism to be active 8. Inverse Compton scattering, on the other hand, does not require very energetic electrons, but requires jets that stay highly relativistic on large scales (≥1 Mpc) and that remain well-aligned with the line of sight. Some recent evidence disfavours 9–12 arXiv:2007.04823v1 [astro-ph.HE] 9 Jul 2020 inverse Compton-CMB models , although other evidence seems to be compatible with them 13, 14.
    [Show full text]
  • A Basic Requirement for Studying the Heavens Is Determining Where In
    Abasic requirement for studying the heavens is determining where in the sky things are. To specify sky positions, astronomers have developed several coordinate systems. Each uses a coordinate grid projected on to the celestial sphere, in analogy to the geographic coordinate system used on the surface of the Earth. The coordinate systems differ only in their choice of the fundamental plane, which divides the sky into two equal hemispheres along a great circle (the fundamental plane of the geographic system is the Earth's equator) . Each coordinate system is named for its choice of fundamental plane. The equatorial coordinate system is probably the most widely used celestial coordinate system. It is also the one most closely related to the geographic coordinate system, because they use the same fun­ damental plane and the same poles. The projection of the Earth's equator onto the celestial sphere is called the celestial equator. Similarly, projecting the geographic poles on to the celest ial sphere defines the north and south celestial poles. However, there is an important difference between the equatorial and geographic coordinate systems: the geographic system is fixed to the Earth; it rotates as the Earth does . The equatorial system is fixed to the stars, so it appears to rotate across the sky with the stars, but of course it's really the Earth rotating under the fixed sky. The latitudinal (latitude-like) angle of the equatorial system is called declination (Dec for short) . It measures the angle of an object above or below the celestial equator. The longitud inal angle is called the right ascension (RA for short).
    [Show full text]
  • Gli Ammassi Di Galassie
    Universo in Fiore 2017 CORSO BASE I GIGANTI DEL COSMO: GLI AMMASSI DI GALASSIE Sabrina De Grandi [email protected] Organizzazione spaziale delle galassie Ammassi Gruppi Galassie 100 mila a.l. ~30 kpc 3 milioni a.l. ~ 103 kpc 20 milioni a.l. ~ 7x103 kpc I primi cataloghi di ammassi Fino agli anni ’80: ispezione visuale di lastre fotografiche alla ricerca di sovradensita` di galassie. Es. di lastre fotografiche: • PSS: National Geographic Society-Palomar Observatory Sky Survey (Telescopio 5m Hale, Mt. Wilson US) • UKST: Schmidt telescope IIIa-J plates (Telescopio 1.2m, UK-Australia),… I cataloghi di Abell (1958) e Zwicky (1961-1968) Il catalogo piu` usato: Abell (1958) Emisfero Nord (2712) e A.C.O. (1989) Emisfero Sud (1364). 1958: Abell ispeziono` di 104 deg2 di lastre PSS (Luna ~0.25 deg2) Criteri principali: • almeno 30 galassie • compatto (0.02<z<0.2) • piano galattico escluso Dagli anni ’90: • algoritmi automatici di identificazione al posto dell’occhio umano. • Non più lastre fotografiche, ma immagini digitali (CCD) • SDSS (Sloan Digital Sky Survey), iniziata nel 2000 e tutt’ora in atto (35% del cielo osservato, 500 milioni di oggetti, catalogo di ammassi • Accesso libero ai dati (nel Telescopio dedicato ad 2015: 13o Data Release) Apache Point 2.5m (US) Immagine SDSS dell’ammasso A2142 MACS J1206.2-0847 DIAMETRO tipico di un ammasso di galassie ~ 20 milioni anni luce ~ 7 Mpc SPICA (훼 costellazione della Vergine) MACS J1206.2-0847 DIAMETRO tipico di un ammasso di galassie ~ 20 milioni anni luce ~ 7 Mpc ma… DISTANZA di MACS J1206 ~ 4.5 miliardi di anni luce ~ 1500 Mpc Dove si trova la Via Lattea in questa struttura universale? ovvero Noi ci troviamo in un Ammasso di galassie? Il Gruppo Locale 100.000 a.l.
    [Show full text]
  • August 2012 of You Know I Went to the Astronomical League Conference (Alcon) in Chicago at the Beginning of July with My Grandmother
    BACKBACK BAYBAY observerobserver The Official Newsletter of the Back Bay Amateur Astronomers P.O. Box 9877, Virginia Beach, VA 23450-9877 Looking Up! Hello again! This month I actually have a story EPHEMERALS to tell, instead of just random ramblings. As most august 2012 of you know I went to the Astronomical League Conference (ALCon) in Chicago at the beginning of July with my grandmother. It was great. Not quite 08/24, 7:00 pm as good as last year, seeing as I had to pay for it Night Hike and they didn’t give me a check and a plaque this Northwest River Park year (last year I won the Horkheimer Youth award, which paid for my trip), but it was still a lot of fun, and very educational. I met a lot of cool 08/24, 8:00 pm people and definitely learned something. The Garden Stars whole trip was a big story, but a few events stand Norfolk Botanical Gardens out the most in my memory, and they’re all connected to some extent. 08/28, 7:00 pm Boardwalk Astronomy It all started on the day we got there. ALCon is Near 24th St Stage an annual four day conference usually in the VA Beach Oceanfront beginning of July. This year, the day we got there was July fourth. After checking in, taking a nap and 09/06, 7:30 pm dining, we decided to participate in the observing BBAA Monthly Meeting event outside the hotel. It was in a parking lot with lights, and fireworks, but there was a large moon TCC Campus and Saturn was up, so we went for it.
    [Show full text]
  • The Sky This Week
    The sky this week April 20 to April 26, 2020 By Joe Grida, Technical Informaon Officer, ASSA ([email protected]) elcome to the fourth edion of The Sky this Week. It is designed to keep you looking up during these rather uncertain mes. We can’t get together for Members’ Viewing Nights, so I thought I’d write this W to give you some ideas of observing targets that you can chase on any clear night this coming week. As I said in my recent Starwatch* column in The Adverser newspaper: “Even with the restricons in place, stargazing is something that you can do easily on your own. It helps to relieve stress and will keep your sense of perspecve. It’s prey hard to walk away from a night under the stars without a jusfiable sense of awe. And also without sensing a real, albeit tenuous, connecon with the cosmos at large”. * Published on the last Friday of each month Naked eye star walk Over in the eastern late evening sky, Scorpius, the Scorpion (one of the few constellaons in our sky that actually resembles what it is supposed to represent) is difficult to miss. He will keep us company over the coming chilly winter months. Its brightest star, Antares, is a huge star of gargantuan proporons. If we replaced our Sun with it, then all the planets from Mercury through to Jupiter would all find themselves engulfed within it! Just below the tail of Scorpius, you can find the star clusters designated M6 and M7. Take the trouble to observe these with binoculars.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review on Substellar Objects Below the Deuterium Burning Mass Limit: Planets, Brown Dwarfs Or What?
    geosciences Review A Review on Substellar Objects below the Deuterium Burning Mass Limit: Planets, Brown Dwarfs or What? José A. Caballero Centro de Astrobiología (CSIC-INTA), ESAC, Camino Bajo del Castillo s/n, E-28692 Villanueva de la Cañada, Madrid, Spain; [email protected] Received: 23 August 2018; Accepted: 10 September 2018; Published: 28 September 2018 Abstract: “Free-floating, non-deuterium-burning, substellar objects” are isolated bodies of a few Jupiter masses found in very young open clusters and associations, nearby young moving groups, and in the immediate vicinity of the Sun. They are neither brown dwarfs nor planets. In this paper, their nomenclature, history of discovery, sites of detection, formation mechanisms, and future directions of research are reviewed. Most free-floating, non-deuterium-burning, substellar objects share the same formation mechanism as low-mass stars and brown dwarfs, but there are still a few caveats, such as the value of the opacity mass limit, the minimum mass at which an isolated body can form via turbulent fragmentation from a cloud. The least massive free-floating substellar objects found to date have masses of about 0.004 Msol, but current and future surveys should aim at breaking this record. For that, we may need LSST, Euclid and WFIRST. Keywords: planetary systems; stars: brown dwarfs; stars: low mass; galaxy: solar neighborhood; galaxy: open clusters and associations 1. Introduction I can’t answer why (I’m not a gangstar) But I can tell you how (I’m not a flam star) We were born upside-down (I’m a star’s star) Born the wrong way ’round (I’m not a white star) I’m a blackstar, I’m not a gangstar I’m a blackstar, I’m a blackstar I’m not a pornstar, I’m not a wandering star I’m a blackstar, I’m a blackstar Blackstar, F (2016), David Bowie The tenth star of George van Biesbroeck’s catalogue of high, common, proper motion companions, vB 10, was from the end of the Second World War to the early 1980s, and had an entry on the least massive star known [1–3].
    [Show full text]
  • An Early Detection of Blue Luminescence by Neutral Pahs in the Direction of the Yellow Hypergiant HR 5171A?
    A&A 583, A98 (2015) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526392 & c ESO 2015 Astrophysics An early detection of blue luminescence by neutral PAHs in the direction of the yellow hypergiant HR 5171A? A. M. van Genderen1, H. Nieuwenhuijzen2, and A. Lobel3 1 Leiden Observatory, Leiden University, Postbus 9513, 2300RA Leiden, The Netherlands e-mail: [email protected] 2 SRON Laboratory for Space Research, Sorbonnelaan 2, 3584 CA Utrecht, The Netherlands 3 Royal Observatory of Belgium, Ringlaan 3, 1180 Brussels, Belgium Received 23 April 2015 / Accepted 23 August 2015 ABSTRACT Aims. We re-examined photometry (VBLUW, UBV, uvby) of the yellow hypergiant HR 5171A made a few decades ago. In that study no proper explanation could be given for the enigmatic brightness excesses in the L band (VBLUW system, λeff = 3838 Å). In the present paper, we suggest that this might have been caused by blue luminescence (BL), an emission feature of neutral polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon molecules (PAHs), discovered in 2004. It is a fact that the highest emission peaks of the BL lie in the L band. Our goals were to investigate other possible causes, and to derive the fluxes of the emission. Methods. We used two-colour diagrams based on atmosphere models, spectral energy distributions, and different extinctions and extinction laws, depending on the location of the supposed BL source: either in Gum48d on the background or in the envelope of HR 5171A. Results. False L–excess sources, such as a hot companion, a nearby star, or some instrumental effect, could be excluded. Also, emission features from a hot chromosphere are not plausible.
    [Show full text]