At a Meeting of the PLANNING & LICENSING COMMITTEE held at the Council Chamber, Council Offices, Kilworthy Park, Drake Road, on TUESDAY the 16th day of DECEMBER 2014 at 10.00 am.

Present: Cllr C M Marsh – Chairman Cllr M J R Benson – Vice-Chairman Cllr R E Baldwin Cllr W G Cann OBE Cllr C Hall Cllr L J G Hockridge Cllr T G Pearce Cllr J Sheldon Cllr D Whitcomb

Development Manager Planning Team Leader Senior Planning Officer Solicitor (Mrs B Fowlds) Committee & Ombudsman Link Officer

In attendance: Cllr S Bailey Cllr D Cloke Cllr D Horn Cllr A Leech Cllr J Moody Cllr R Musgrave

P&L 38 APOLOGY FOR ABSENCE An apology for absence was received from Cllr D M Wilde.

P&L 39 DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST Cllr M J R Benson – Applications 01065/2014 and 00998/2014 – Personal – Member of Parish Council

Cllr C Hall – Application 01250/2014 – Personal – Ward Member

Cllr L J G Hockridge – Application 00726/2014 – Personal – Ward Member

Cllr T G Pearce – Personal – Member of the Building Control Partnership

Cllr J Sheldon – Application 00860/2014 – Personal – Ward Member

*P&L 40 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES The Minutes of the Meeting held on 21st October 2014 (page 3 to the Agenda), were confirmed and signed by the Chairman as a correct record.

*P&L 41 PLANNING, LISTED BUILDING AND ENFORCEMENT REPORTS The Committee considered the applications prepared by the Development Manager (page 12 to the Agenda) and considered also the comments of Parish Councils together with other representations received, which are noted below, and RESOLVED:

3

PLANNING APPLICATION REPORT

Case Officer: Jeremy Guise Ward: Bere Ferrers

Ward Members: Cllrs M Benson: R Musgrave

Application No: 01065/2014

Agent/Applicant: Applicant: Ward and Chowen Mr T Young Mr J Spiers Clamoak Farm Tavistock Livestock Centre Bere Alston Whitchurch Road Yelverton Tavistock Devon Devon PL19 8AA PL20 7BU

Site Address: Clamoak Farm, Bere Alston, Yelverton, Devon, PL20 7BU

Development: Temporary siting of caravan for an agricultural worker.

Reason item is being put before Committee Cllr M Benson (Ward Member): Bere Ferrers Parish Council’s Planning Committee objected to application number 01065/2014 for the temporary siting of a caravan for an agricultural worker at Clamoak Farm, Bere Alston PL20 7BU. Their reason for objection is the location within the area, as it is in their opinion in a prominent position within the conservation area of Weir Quay and would be better located closer to nearby barns and I support that view. Local residents have also raised questions over the sale of a tied cottage that was sold recently within the same location and why another tied property is now required. I would like this application to go before the P&L committee.

Recommendation: Conditional planning permission be granted

Conditions 1. Time limit 2. Approved plan numbers 3. Materials 4. Details of landscaping 5. Implementation of landscaping

Key issues for consideration: - The design and appearance of the proposed extensions, including its impact upon the street scene - The impact of the proposed dwelling upon the amenities of neighbouring residential property - The adequacy of access arrangements and impact upon the highway network

The site is located in open countryside where planning permission is not normally granted for new dwellings. Some policy provision exists for exceptions to this general presumption, where is can be demonstrated that strict set of criteria are met. These are set out in H31 and H32. 4

The agricultural justification for the mobile home has been assessed by the council’s agricultural advisor who found no essential need for a new agricultural dwelling in this location. As the provisions in policies H31 and H32 are to provide for exceptions to the prevailing policy regime, which is against development in the open countryside, it is not considered that conditions can be used to overcome the fundamental policy conflict.

The proposed mobile unit, by reason of its use, location and lack of essential need, constituted an unjustified new residential unit in the open countryside and as such is contrary to Development Plan Policies NE10, H31, H32 of the Borough Council Local Plan Review SP1, SP5 of the adopted core strategy and paragraph 55 of the NPPF.

The Case Officer advised the Committee that the three indented paragraphs following the key issues sub-heading (page 14 to the Agenda) and the second paragraph given under the County Highways consultation (page 15 to the Agenda) should be disregarded and they had been erroneously included within the report.

The Proposal: Planning permission is sought for a mobile home for an agricultural worker for a temporary period of 3 years. Beyond a square shaped plot with a rectangular shaped indication of a position for ‘mobile home’ the application does not provide details of appearance. The proposed dwelling is shown with a new access onto the farm track, to the north of the existing track for the recently completed farm building, which is located immediately to the north east.

Consultations: County Highways Authority Bere Ferrers Parish Council Tamar Valley AONB Agricultural Appraiser Representations – 4 representations received

SPEAKERS: Mr J Ellis – Objector Mr T Young – Applicant

It was then moved by the Chairman, seconded by the Vice-Chairman, that the application be granted conditionally and upon being put to the vote, the motion was lost.

The Committee was cognizant of the independent agricultural appraiser’s professional opinion. Further, the Committee also had some sympathy with the purpose behind the application and the aspirations attached thereto but also considered that in granting the application it would have a detrimental impact upon the Tamar Valley AONB, particularly as the chosen site was in a prominent position.

It was then moved and seconded that the application be refused and upon being put to the vote the application was REFUSED for the following reasons:

1. The proposed scheme by reason of its siting in an exposed landscape location within the Tamar Valley AONB, would have an unacceptable detrimental impact upon the character and special qualities of the AONB. There was no over-riding justification for this siting. As such, the proposal is 5

contrary to policies NE10 and H32 of the West Devon Local Plan, SP17 of the Core Strategy and the guidance contained within the NPPF.

PLANNING APPLICATION REPORT

Case Officer: Jeremy Guise Ward:

Ward Member: Cllr C Hall

Application No: 01250/2014

Agent/Applicant: Applicant: Robert H Hicks & Co Mr I Balsdon Mrs H Merritt Reed Farm West Hele Hatherleigh Devon Devon EX20 3LH EX39 5LX

Site Address: Reed Farm, Hatherleigh, Okehampton, Devon, EX20 3LH

Development: Erection of agricultural workers dwelling.

Reason item is being put before Committee Cllr Hall (Ward Member) - I would like this application to come to committee on the grounds that I have no objections to the development and believe the dwelling could only give sustainability to this rural business and help it move forward. This is also supported by the Town Council.

REFUSED for the following reasons: 1. Whilst there is a functional need in relation to the applicant’s total land holdings and enterprise at Hatherleigh for an additional full time worker, this application has not adequately demonstrated that there is not alternative accommodation nearby in Hatherleigh which is suitable and available for occupation instead of the proposed dwelling, i.e. it has not been demonstrated that another dwelling is required on-site. For this reason the development would not meet all of the criteria set out in the Local Plan Policy H31 and the proposal would not accord with NPPF policy set out in paragraph 55. 2. The size and scale of the proposed dwelling is excessive in relation to its stated function in providing modest accommodation for a second farm worker at the farm. This potentially makes it more difficult to ensure that it remains agriculturally tied and available for a farm worker in perpetuity. As such it is contrary to Policy H31 of the West Devon Local Plan.

Key issues for consideration:  Whether there has been a clear need demonstrated for an agricultural workers dwelling against Local Plan H31 in this outline submission.

Site Description: The 0.01ha diamond shaped site lies approximately 340m east from the Hatherleigh settlement boundary and is presently an open grazing field neighbouring Reed farm

6

house. The land rises slightly along Sanctuary Lane as the application land is on higher ground level as compared to neighbouring Reed farm house.

There is currently hedgerow cover between Sanctuary Lane and the site along the boundary and the site. The nearest neighbouring property (named Yollaberry) is located approximately 380m distance away, towards the south western direction. The site is considered to be set in open countryside and is not covered by any designation.

The Proposal: Planning permission is sought for the erection of an agricultural workers dwelling.

Plans show ‘T’ shaped bungalow containing: entrance lobby, WC, lounge/dining room/kitchen, utility room, bathroom, three bedrooms, wet room, boiler room and a large garage. Externally the building would have rendered concrete block walls interlocking concrete tile roof. A large garage and parking area is shown in the front.

The submission has been accompanied by an agricultural appraisal highlighting the applicants need for another agricultural worker conditioned dwelling to accommodate their daughter who works on the farm and needs to be close to the livestock.

Consultations: Hatherleigh Town Council Environmental Health Section WDBC Agricultural Advisor WDBC Countryside & Special Projects Officer Representations – 1 representation received

SPEAKER: Mrs H Merritt – Agent

PLANNING APPLICATION REPORT

Case Officer: Jeremy Guise Ward: Tavistock North

Ward Members: Cllrs S Bailey; J Moody; J Sheldon

Application No: 00860/2014 Agent/Applicant: Applicant: EJFP Planning Mr S Barnett 49 Bannawell Street Court Farm House Tavistock 17 Court Road PL19 0DP Newton Ferrers PL8 1DN

Site Address: Laurel Cottage, Kilworthy Hill, Tavistock, PL19 0EP

Development: Retention of dwelling - revised scheme to 01885/2011 (part retrospective).

Reason item is being put before Committee Cllr S Bailey (Tavistock North): “This site has a complex history involving appeals and building not in accordance with the approved plan. I think that it would benefit from being considered at Planning and Licensing Committee”. 7

Cllr J Moody (Tavistock North): “Having looked at this application, the objection on this application & previous applications, previously expressed officer reasons for refusal of earlier applications for the development, your comprehensive report & that as the application is within the Tavistock CA, I have grave concerns regarding the size, bulk & mass of this proposal and that it fails, amongst other things, to fulfil the fundamental requirement of the local adopted plan or the Tavistock Conservation Area Management Plan which is to preserve & enhance the character the Tavistock CA. Therefore, I feel that this application should be considered by the Planning Committee”.

Recommendation: Conditional permission be granted

Conditions 1. Time Limit 2. Approved plan Numbers 3. Material samples 4. Boundary Treatment 5. Details of surface and foul water drainage 6. Roof windows 1.7m high 7. Removal of PD Part 1 Classes B and C

Key issues for consideration:  The design and appearance of the development with reference to its impact upon the conservation area.  Impact upon the amenities of neighbouring property

Site Description: This application relates to a construction site containing the partially complete ‘shell’ of a new house, built within the former garden of Laurel Cottage. Currently partly hidden, behind extensive scaffolding, is the concrete plinth, external structure, block work walls (up to eaves height), window frames and the southern side of the roof of the new house. Work on the property has temporarily ceased, whilst the applicant resolves planning issues.

The property is located near the top of, Kilworthy Hill, a steep residential street that leads onto Drake Road. Laurel Cottage is a traditional stone built cottage located on higher land, to the north. The building plot has been created through a sub-division of its’ garden. It is in the same ownership as the application site. Sally House is the neighbour immediately to the south. It is three storeys high and set forward on its’ plot at the back of the pavement. The new dwelling does not become visible, on the Kilworthy Hill approach, until you are almost at the corner – although it is visible, at a distance, from across the valley and at other points east from within the town.

On lower ground, to the south west of the property and accessed via a drive, that runs between Sally House and the new dwelling, is another residential property: ‘The Knoll’. The former railway station, now a private residence, is located on much higher ground, to the north. On the opposite side of Kilworthy Hill is ‘Bella Vista’ a large ‘scotto’ rendered Victorian house which partially screens Laurel Cottage and the application house from wider view.

8

The Proposal: Planning permission is sought for the retention and completion of the partly built dwelling. It is in substantial part retrospective.

Plans show entrance hall, dining/kitchen sitting room/study WC and double garage on the ground floor; two double bedrooms both with en-suite bathrooms and a living room on the first floor and a bedroom and bathroom at second floor level.

The main changes in comparison with the previously approved scheme are:- 1. Provision of a second floor to provide an extra bedroom and bathroom. This involves a small 0.3m increase in the overall width of the property and, to maintain the 40 degree roof pitch a small 0.27m increase in the overall ridge height on the southern part of the roof, where the extra accommodation is proposed in the southern part of the property. An obscure glazed window serving the additional bathroom on the southern gable elevation and four ‘velux’ style roof lights, above 1.7m are shown on the front (east) and rear (west) roof planes to provide daylight for the additional bedroom, bathroom and staircase. The proposal changes the roof profile, introducing a ‘step’ change in the middle, so that it drops down 0.22m in a ‘double height’ feature over the living room. 2. Excavations to provide a double garage adjacent to the ground floor on the northern side of the property. This involves projecting the ground floor approximately 1.9 - 2.3m on the east (front) elevation and approximately 1.3m on the west (rear) elevation

In a letter that accompanies the application the applicant’s agent explains some of the history of the site, the changes made to address the previous retrospective refusal, and how he hopes that the further changes made in this application address those concerns.

Consultations: County Highways Authority Tavistock Town Council WDBC Affordable Housing WDBC Principal Engineer Representations: 1 representation received

SPEAKER: Mr E Persse – Agent

It was moved by the Chairman, seconded by the Vice-Chairman that the application be granted subject to the conditions given in the Case Officer’s report, but upon being put to the vote the proposal to grant was lost.

The Committee was concerned that whilst the development had received approval from a Planning Inspector, the proposal now before them and partially constructed on site was considerably different to that approved by the Planning Inspector. The Committee was further concerned that the proposal now before them would be over dominant and have a detrimental effect on the Conservation Area. In their deliberations, the Committee was advised that should they decide to refuse the application, then enforcement action may be necessary to achieve adherence to the approved plans.

9

It was then moved and duly seconded that the application be refused and upon being put to the vote the application was REFUSED for the following reasons:

1. The proposed development by virtue of its roof height and profile would represent an incongruous feature detrimental to the character of the Conservation Area. As such it is contrary to policies BE1 of the West Devon Local Plan, and SP18 and SP20 of the Core Strategy and the guidance in the NPPF.

It was then further moved and seconded and carried when put to the vote that appropriate enforcement action be authorised to seek adherence to the approved plans.

PLANNING APPLICATION REPORT

Case Officer: Emma Bailey Ward: Bere Ferrers

Ward Members: Cllrs M Benson; R Musgrave

Application No: 00998/2014 Agent/Applicant: Applicant: Elford Maddock Architectural Practice Mr & Mrs King Fao Mr J Maddock Edgmont 23 Fore Street The Down Bere Alston Bere Alston Yelverton Yelverton PL20 7AA Devon PL20 7HG

Site Address: Edgmont, The Down, Bere Alston, Yelverton, Devon, PL20 7HG

Development: Householder application for rear dormer extension to dwelling and extension to rear of garage.

Reason item is being put before Committee: Cllr Benson has asked for this application to be put forward in light of the height differential on the site.

The Committee was further advised that the applicants were related to a member of staff.

GRANTED subject to the following conditions: 1. Standard time limit 2. Build in accordance with plans 3. Unexpected contaminated land 4. Obscure glaze workshop window 5. Workshop for private use only

Informative: 1. Proactive statement

Key issues for consideration: The main issues for consideration relate to the impact that the development would have upon the existing dwellinghouse, neighbouring properties and street scene, and 10 the wider Tamar Valley AONB landscape. Owing to the minor nature of the proposal and the distance of the proposal from neighbouring properties it is considered that the development would be acceptable in its form, and would not create a significant detrimental impact upon the amenity of the surrounding dwellings or AONB. The application is therefore recommended for approval.

Site Description: Edgmont is roughcast rendered bungalow within the settlement boundary of Bere Alston. The property is substantially set back from the roadside on a lower level and is accessed by means of a shared driveway with another bungalow of similar age and scale. A large garage is sited forward of the principle elevation of the property that faces toward the roadside. The dwelling is not listed, nor within a conservation area, but is within the Tamar Valley AONB. It possesses a slate roof and uPVC windows and doors, with a stone wall fronting the roadside and close board fencing and small trees and shrubbery around the remaining perimeter boundary. A tall hedgerow lines the rear boundary of the site, which falls away to lower ground used as a cemetery.

The Proposal: This application proposes the erection of an extension to the rear of an existing detached garage to form a workshop, and the insertion of dormer windows to the rear elevation of the property.

The garage extension is to extend 3 metres from the rear of the existing garage, and retain the width of the building at 6.3 metres. One window is to be inserted into the north western, rear elevation of the extension to allow for natural light into the workshop, with one external door to be inserted into the south western, side elevation of the proposal facing into the applicant’s own garden. Materials are to match existing, with the roof eaves and roof ridge to also match. However, owing to the topography of the land, in order to retain the existing ridge height of the garage, the extension will be raised on a plinth to match the existing floor level, meaning that the maximum height of the development will measure 3.1 metres and 5.3 metres to its eaves and its roof ridge respectively.

The proposed dormer windows will span 7.3 metres across the 15.8 metre length of the roof line. Three windows are to be incorporated into the development, and will sit 0.3 metres below the roof ridge height of the existing dwelling at their highest point.

Consultations: County Highways Authority Environmental Health Section Bere Ferrers Parish Council Tamar Valley AONB Representations: 1 representation received

SPEAKER: Mrs F Maddock – Agent

PLANNING APPLICATION REPORT

Case Officer: Neil Maud Ward:

Ward Member: Cllr L J G Hockridge 11

Application No: 00726/2014

Agent/Applicant: Applicant: EJFP Planning Tobias Developments Ltd 49 Bannawell Street Langworthy Farm Tavistock Okehampton PL19 0DP EX20 4LH

Site Address: Brooklands, Bratton , Okehampton, EX20 4JH

Development: Demolition of the existing farm buildings and the erection of 4 live/work units and associated parking provision.

Reason item is being put before Committee: The views of the ward member are contrary to the officer’s recommendation

Recommendation: Refusal

Reasons for refusal: 1. The site is in the open countryside where development is strictly controlled. The proposal seeks to provide properties that would be tantamount to new dwellings in the countryside, in this unsustainable location, remote from any urban area and therefore distant from adequate services and facilities, such as education, wider employment, health, retail, leisure and public transport. As a consequence, occupiers of the new development are likely to be dependant on private vehicles for most of their daily needs. In addition the business aspect of the units, particularly given their design, is likely to lead to larger vehicles and greater number of deliveries and collections in this remote rural location quite some distance from the main highway network. Such fostering of growth in the need to travel would be contrary to government advice. No evidence has been submitted to show that it is essential that the live/work units are located in the countryside. The proposal is therefore contrary to policies SP1, SP5, SP10, SP11, SP24 of the Core Strategy and saved policies H31, ED16 and NE10 of the Local Plan Review.

2. The proposal by virtue of its scale and design that is not considered to reflect or reinforce local distinctiveness or be an exemplar project and as such would have an adverse visual impact upon the appearance of the countryside. The development is therefore contrary to the advice contained within Policies SP1, SP20 of the West Devon Borough Core Strategy and Policy H31 of the West Devon Borough Local Plan and the National Planning Policy Framework.

Key issues for consideration: The main issues for consideration are the principle of development, the appropriateness of the design, scale, siting and materials used, the impact the proposals would have upon the appearance of the surrounding countryside, the impact the proposal would have upon biodiversity and the impact the proposals would have upon highway safety.

Financial Implications: Not applicable as the proposal was for flats which are exempt from any form of affordable housing contribution. 12

Site Description: The site is located in open countryside along a single track lane adjacent to an existing detached dwelling known as Brooklands. The nearest settlement is Bratton Clovelly over 2 miles east of the site. On site are a group of redundant agricultural buildings with an existing access.

The Proposal: Permission is sought to erect four detached live/work units with a mix of B1, B2 and B8 uses to the employment element.

Consultations: County Highways Authority Environmental Health Section Countryside Officer Bratton Clovelly Parish Council Ward Member Representations: none received

SPEAKERS: Mr D Barrow – Bratton Clovelly Parish Council Mr D Telfor-Smollet – Applicant

Conclusion: The proposal is inappropriate and unsustainable to a countryside location that is isolated away from any significant settlements. Any occupants will be dependent upon the car to for everyday needs; the business uses are likely to increase vehicular activity in this location away from the highway network. Without robust justification to the need for the proposals to be located here the principle of development for this proposal is unacceptable in this location and contrary to the adopted development plan.

The Committee had undertaken a site inspection prior to receiving a copy of the case officer’s report. During the site inspection, the Committee had noted the proposed location of the 4 live/work units and their setting in the locality. They had been advised of community support for the proposal and that a number of local people had expressed keen interest in securing the accommodation. The Parish Council strongly supported the proposal as did the Ward Member.

It was then moved by the Chairman, seconded by the Vice-Chairman, that the application be refused as recommended but upon being put to the vote the motion was lost.

It was the Committee’s considered view that the application would bring a benefit to the community and it was, therefore, moved and seconded accordingly that the application be GRANTED subject to the following conditions:

1. Standard time limit 2. Strict accordance with the approved plans 3. Unexpected contaminated land with remedial action to be approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority 4. Materials 5. Prior to commencement, a landscaping scheme shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. All landscaping works shall be carried out in accordance with the approved plans and completed within 6 months of the first occupation of any building or the completion of 13

development whichever is the sooner, unless agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. Any trees, plants, grassed areas which within a period of 5 years from planting die, are removed or become seriously damaged or diseased shall be replaced in the first available planting season with others of a similar size species or quality unless the Local Planning Authority gives written consent for any variation. 6. Prior to commencement, any vegetation removal shall be timed to commence outside the nesting season (generally March to August) and any works to remove vegetation during this period a comprehensive check to be made to ascertain any active nesting and, if so, works should be delayed and a 5 metre buffer zone established pending fledging. 7. Notwithstanding the details provided, there shall be no external lighting unless otherwise agreed in writing by the Local Planning Authority. 8. No part of the development shall be occupied or brought into its intended use until the parking, servicing, commercial vehicle loading/unloading areas, garaging areas relating thereto have been consolidated, surfaced, laid out and constructed in accordance with the approved plans and kept as such permanently thereafter. 9. Removal of PD rights for extensions, porches, garages or car ports, huts, fencing or other structures. 10. B1, B2 and B8 uses only. 11. The business element of the development shall operate from 7.00 am to 8.00 pm Monday to Saturday with no Sunday or Bank Holiday operation on the site. 12. Details of surface and foul water drainage and maintenance and management of the systems to be submitted to approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority. 13. Prior to commencement, a scheme detailing the addition and/or integration of bat access and bird nesting opportunities shall be submitted to and approved in writing by the Local Planning Authority and the development completed in accordance with the approved scheme. 14. The ‘live’ element of the units shall only be occupied by persons working at the accompanying ‘work’ element of the unit and, similarly, the ‘work’ element shall only be operated by persons living within the ‘live’ element. 15. The residential ‘live’ element of the units shall be confined to that outlined in orange on approved plan 2014/004.1 and the work element shall be contained to that outlined in green.

*P&L 42 PLANNING APPEALS UPDATE

APPLICATION No: 00398/2014 APPELLANT: Mr S Barnett PROPOSAL: Retention of dwelling – revised scheme to 01885/2011 (retrospective). LOCATION: Laurel Cottage, Kilworthy Hill, Tavistock, Devon PL19 0EP APPEAL STATUS: APPEAL DECIDED APPEAL START DATE: 23-Jul-2014 APPEAL DECISION: Appeal Dismissed APPEAL DECISION DATE: 21-Oct-2014

14

APPLICATION No: 00498/2014 APPELLANT: Mr R Jones PROPOSAL: Removal of condition 14 restricting the use of stables to non-commercial purposes on planning permission 3260/2002. LOCATION: Stables, Week Farm, , Devon APPEAL STATUS: APPEAL LODGED APPEAL START DATE: 18-Nov-2014 APPEAL DECISION: APPEAL DECISION DATE:

APPLICATION No: 00497/2014 APPELLANT: Mr R Jones PROPOSAL: Removal of condition 1 restricting occupation to holiday let of APP/Q1153/A/08/2071702 to allow full time residential occupation LOCATION: The Coach House, Week, Brentor, Devon PL19 0NL APPEAL STATUS: APPEAL LODGED APPEAL START DATE: 18-Nov-2014 APPEAL DECISION: APPEAL DECISION DATE:

APPLICATION No: 00698/2014 APPELLANT: Mr M Gazzard PROPOSAL: Householder application for removal of single storey conservatory and replacement with two storey rear extension and single storey extension to existing kitchen. Addition of timber porch over garage door to front. LOCATION: Pearldene, Folly Gate EX20 3AQ APPEAL STATUS: APPEAL DECIDED APPEAL START DATE: 9-Oct-2014 APPEAL DECISION: Appeal Dismissed APPEAL DECISION DATE: 21-Oct-2014

APPLICATION No: 00843/2014 APPELLANT: Mr M Williamson PROPOSAL: Erection of 4 flats and associated car parking. LOCATION: The Poplars, Westbridge Industrial Estate, Tavistock, Devon APPEAL STATUS: APPEAL LODGED APPEAL START DATE: 26-Nov-2014 APPEAL DECISION: APPEAL DECISION DATE:

*P&L 43 DELEGATED DECISIONS The Committee received and noted the list of delegated decisions (page 58 to the Agenda).

(The Meeting terminated at 12.47 pm.)

15