Experimental Characterization and Modeling of High Strength Martensitic Steels Based on a New Distortional Hardening Model

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Experimental Characterization and Modeling of High Strength Martensitic Steels Based on a New Distortional Hardening Model EXPERIMENTAL CHARACTERIZATION AND MODELING OF HIGH STRENGTH MARTENSITIC STEELS BASED ON A NEW DISTORTIONAL HARDENING MODEL BY ELIZABETH K BARTLETT A DISSERTATION PRESENTED TO THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA IN PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE DEGREE OF DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA 2018 © 2018 Elizabeth K Bartlett 2 To my daughter, Gwyneth Webb, who helps me to have fun, laugh, and love through the most difficult times in my life. 3 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to thank all the members of my supervisory committee for their support. I would especially like to thank my committee chair, Prof. Oana Cazacu, for her support and constructive criticisms. It was an honor and a privilege to study her research. I would also like to thank Dr. Benoit Revil- Baudard for his expertise in numerical methods. I am so grateful for the support of the 96th Test Wing, my sponsoring facility in the Science, Mathematics, and Research for Transformation (SMART) scholarship program. Specifically, I would like to thank my commanders and supervisor, Mr. Ron Lutz, as well as, Mrs. Linda Busch and Dr. Betta Jerome. I also greatly appreciate the support of the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) in the experimental characterization of Eglin steel: Dr. Geremy Kleiser and Dr. Philip Flater for their training in quasi-static testing, Dr. Brad Martin and Dr. Xu Nie for their expertise in dynamic split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB) testing, Dr. Rachel Abrahams and Dr. Sean Gibbons for their instruction in microscopy and material science, and Mr. Richard Harris for his expertise in material characterization at the Advanced Weapons Effects Facility (AWEF). I extend my gratitude to my friends and family for listening to me ramble on and on about subsequent yield surfaces and various hardening models. Finally, I would like to thank Gwyneth Webb, my 12-year old daughter, for her encouragement and patience over long nights and weekends in room 171 of the University of Florida (UF) Research and Engineering Education Facility (REEF). 4 TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................... 4 LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................... 7 LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................. 8 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................... 13 ABSTRACT ......................................................................................................... 16 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................. 18 1.1 Background of Ultra High Strength Martensitic Steel..................... 18 1.2 Survey of the Experimental Studies on Martensitic Steels ............ 23 1.3 Eglin Steel, ES-1 ........................................................................... 32 1.4 Elastic-Plastic Modeling ................................................................. 38 1.5 Goals of Current Research ............................................................ 48 2 MICROSCOPY ................................................................................................ 50 2.1 Optical Microscopy of ES-1 ........................................................... 51 2.2 Material Characterization using SEM ............................................ 55 3 MECHANICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF ES-1 ......................................... 63 3.1 Hardness of Eglin Steel ................................................................. 63 3.2 Quasi-Static Mechanical Characterization ..................................... 65 3.3 Dynamic Experimental Characterization of Eglin Steel .................. 82 3.4 Cyclic Experimental Characterization of ES-1 ............................... 99 3.5 Summary of the Experimental Characterization of ES-1 ............. 104 4 ELASTIC-PLASTIC MODEL FOR EGLIN STEEL ..................................... 105 4.1 Development of the Yield Criterion .............................................. 105 4.2 Asymmetric Hardening ................................................................ 112 4.3 Implementing the Proposed Yield Function ................................. 137 4.4 Implications of the Proposed Yield Function ............................... 143 5 5 FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS ..................................................................... 145 5.1 Review of Finite Element Analysis .............................................. 145 5.2 Implementation of the Elastic-Plastic Model in FEA .................... 149 5.3 Finite Element Analysis of Ultra High Strength Martensitic Steel 151 5.4 Elastic-Plastic Model Predictions ................................................ 170 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................... 178 REFERENCES ................................................................................................. 184 BIOGRAPHICAL SKETCH ............................................................................... 194 6 LIST OF TABLES Table Page 1-1 Monotonic and cyclic material properties. ................................................ 30 1-2 Chemical composition by percent weight of AF-1410, SAE 4340, and ES- 1. .............................................................................................................. 33 1-3 Mechanical properties under uniaxial, quasi-static tensile loading of AF- 1410, SAE 4340, and ES-1. ..................................................................... 34 2-1 Heat treatment schedule for ES-1. ........................................................... 50 2-2 ES-1 grinding and polishing schedule. ..................................................... 51 2-3 Chemical composition of ES-1 for EDS. ................................................... 56 3-1 Eglin steel material characterization test matrix. ...................................... 63 3-2 Yield stress and quasi-static compression test data. ................................ 70 3-3 Coefficients involved in Swift and Voce Hardening Laws for ES-1. .......... 70 3-4 Summary of quasi-static tension test data................................................ 72 3-5 Hardening law parameters tensile round specimens. ............................... 73 3-6 Tension-compression asymmetry ratio of ES-1 by plastic strain. ............. 76 3-7 Hardening law parameters flat tension specimens. .................................. 77 3-8 Johnson and Cook material constants for forged, cast, and cast and HIP’d ES-1. ........................................................................................................ 94 4-1 Cazacu and Barlat yield criterion parameters. ........................................ 140 4-2 Points for linear interpolation of the Cazacu and Barlat asymmetry parameter, c. .......................................................................................... 141 5-1 Finite element analysis simulation matrix. .............................................. 152 7 LIST OF FIGURES Figure Page 1-1 Tensile yield stress vs. strain-to-failure of current steels and expected strengths of third-generation UHSS. ........................................................ 19 1-2 The unit cell of single-crystal microstructures of solid steel. ..................... 20 1-3 Illustration of plastic deformation mechanisms. ........................................ 22 1-4 The fractional strength differential parameter vs. the carbon content by percent weight for different SAE 4300 series. .......................................... 24 1-5 The effect of tempering temperature on the strength differential of quenched and tempered 4340 UHSS. ..................................................... 25 1-6 The effect of tempering on the flow stress of various steels. .................... 28 1-7 Absolute flow stress vs. plastic strain of SAE 4340 from hysteresis loops of cyclic testing. ........................................................................................ 31 1-8 STF vs. tensile yield stress for different steels including conventional steels and UHSS. ..................................................................................... 35 1-9 ES-1 symmetric plate impact experimental setup of Martin et al. ............. 37 1-10 Tresca yield surface in Haigh-Westergaard space with the hydrostatic axis and deviatoric plane. ......................................................................... 40 1-11 Von Mises yield surface in Haigh-Westergaard space with the longitudinal axis as the hydrostatic axis. ..................................................................... 41 1-12 Projection in the biaxial plane of the yield surfaces of Drucker, Mises, and Tresca yield criteria. ................................................................................. 42 1-13 Cazacu and Barlat yield surface in Haigh-Westergaard space. ............... 44 1-14 Projection in the biaxial plane of the Cazacu and Barlat yield surface corresponding to flow stress ratios of 3/4, 1, and 5/4. .............................. 45 2-1 Z-stack of several pores on the polished surface of cast eglin steel specimen using CDIC. ............................................................................. 52 2-2 Photomontage stitched from nine individual images of the polished surface of cast ES-1 specimen containing several pores. ....................................
Recommended publications
  • Fatigue Characterization and Cyclic Plasticity Modeling of Magnesium Spot-Welds
    Fatigue Characterization and Cyclic Plasticity Modeling of Magnesium Spot-Welds by Seyed Behzad Behravesh A thesis presented to the University of Waterloo in fulfillment of the thesis requirement for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering Waterloo, Ontario, Canada, 2013 © Seyed Behzad Behravesh 2013 AUTHOR'S DECLARATION I hereby declare that I am the sole author of this thesis. This is a true copy of the thesis, including any required final revisions, as accepted by my examiners. I understand that my thesis may be made electronically available to the public. Seyed Behzad Behravesh ii Abstract The automotive industry is adopting lightweight materials to improve emissions and fuel economy. Magnesium (Mg) alloys are the lightest of engineering metals, but work is required to assess their structural strength, especially for spot-welded applications. In the present research, fatigue behavior of magnesium spot-welds was characterized and compared with steel and aluminum spot-welds. A fatigue model was proposed to predict the failure location and crack initiation life in magnesium structures. The material under investigation, AZ31B-H24 Mg alloy, and its spot-welds were characterized from microstructural and mechanical points of view. Microstructure and hardness of the base metal (BM) and different regions in the spot-welds were studied. Monotonic testing of the BM demonstrated asymmetric hardening behavior under tension and compression. Under cyclic loading, the BM had an asymmetric hysteresis loop. Static behavior of spot-welds was studied with different specimen configurations. The effect of nugget size on the static peak load was similar to that of aluminum and less than steel.
    [Show full text]
  • Mechanical Models in Nonparametric Regression
    IMS Collections From Probability to Statistics and Back: High-Dimensional Models and Processes Vol. 9 (2013) 5–19 c Institute of Mathematical Statistics,2013 DOI:⃝ 10.1214/12-IMSCOLL902 Mechanical models in nonparametric regression 1, 2, Vladim´ır Balek ∗ and Ivan Mizera † Comenius University and University of Alberta This note is devoted to an extrapolation of a solid-mechanic motif from nonparamet- ric regression (or, as it is often referred to, smoothing) and numerical interpolation, athemeoriginatingintheexpositionofspline-basedmethods.Theattentionis turned to the fact that a mechanical analogy, akin to that from elasticity theory for quadratic spline penalties, can be elucidated in plasticity theory for certain penal- ties of different type. It is this—in the (slightly altered) words of a referee, “what would happen if the metaphor underlying splines were replaced by a metaphor of plastic energy”—what is the objective of what follows; everything else, in particular discussion of the origins of (certain types of) splines, or an exhaustive bibliograph- ical account, is outside our scope. To give an idea what mechanical analogies we have in mind, let us start by the quote from the Oxford English Dictionary, referencing (univariate) “draftsman spline” as “a flexible strip of wood or hard rubber used by draftsmen in laying out broad sweeping curves”.Bivariatecasebringsmoresophistication:thedesignation “thin-plate spline” is regularly explained by a story about the deformation of an elastic flat thin plate—see page 139 of Green and Silverman [12]orpage108ofSmall [31]: if the plate is deformed to the shape of the function ϵf,andϵ is small, then the bending energy is (up to the first order) proportional to the smoothing penalty.
    [Show full text]
  • A Force Is Whatever That Can Cause an Object with Mass to Accelerate
    1 www.onlineeducation.bharatsevaksamaj.net www.bssskillmission.in “Foundations of mechanical engineering”. In Section 1 of this course you will cover these topics: Statically Determinate Force Systems Statically Determinate Stress Systems. Stress-Strain Relations. Torsion Topic : Statically Determinate Force Systems Topic Objective: After studying this topic the student should be able to: Define Newtons Law of Motion Definition/Overview: Force: In physics,WWW.BSSVE.IN a force is whatever that can cause an object with mass to accelerate. Force has both magnitude and direction, making it a vector quantity. According to Newton's second law, an object with constant mass will accelerate in proportion to the net force acting upon it and in inverse proportion to its mass. An equivalent formulation is that the net force on an object is equal to the rate of change of momentum it experiences. Forces acting on three-dimensional objects may also cause them to rotate or deform, or result in a change in pressure. The tendency of a force to cause angular acceleration about an axis is termed torque. Deformation and pressure are the result of stress forces within an object. www.bsscommunitycollege.in www.bssnewgeneration.in www.bsslifeskillscollege.in 2 www.onlineeducation.bharatsevaksamaj.net www.bssskillmission.in Key Points: 1. Newtonian mechanics Newton's second law of motion relates the concept of force with the time-derivative of momentum: . In 1687, Newton went on to publish his Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, which used concepts of inertia, force, and conservation to describe the motion of all objects. In this work, Newton set out three laws of motion that to this day are the way forces are described in physics.
    [Show full text]
  • Doctorat Paristech T H È S E L'école Nationale Supérieure Des Mines De
    N°: 2009 ENAM XXXX École doctorale n° 364 : Sciences fondamentales et appliquées Doctorat ParisTech T H È S E pour obtenir le grade de docteur délivré par l’École nationale supérieure des mines de Paris Spécialité “ Mécanique Numérique ” présentée et soutenue publiquement par Zhigang LIU le 23 Avril 2012 Numerical and experimental study of AZ31-O magnesium alloy warm sheet forming Directeur de thèse : Michel BELLET Co-Directeur de thèse : Elisabeth MASSONI Jury Mme Salima BOUVIER , Professeur, Robertval , Université technologique de Compiégne Rapporteur T M.Tudor BALAN , Maître de conférences – HDR, LEM3, Arts et Métiers ParisTech Rapporteur M. Jean-Claude GELIN, Professeur, ENSMM Examinateur H M. Patrice LASNE, Ingénieur, Transvalor Examinateur Mme Elisabeth MASSONI, Maître de recherche, CEMEF, Mines ParisTech Co-Directeur de thèse È M. Michel BELLET, Professeur, CEMEF, Mines ParisTech Directeur de thèse S E MINES ParisTech Centre de Mise en Forme des Matériaux Rue Claude Daunesse B.P.207, 06904 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France Abstract Lightweight materials have been studied widely at present. Because weight reduction while maintaining functional requirements is one of the major goals in industries in order to save materials, energy and costs, etc. As the lightest structural alloys, magnesium alloys offer great potential to displace the most commonly used materials, because its density is about 2/3 of aluminum and 1/4 of steel. However, due to HCP (Hexagonal Close-Packed) crystal structure, magnesium provides only limited ductility for cold forming operations. But its formability improved obviously at elevated temperature. In this project, the material is AZ31- O magnesium alloy sheet, including 3% aluminum and 1% zinc.
    [Show full text]
  • UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations
    UC Berkeley UC Berkeley Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Lagrangian and Eulerian Forms of Finite Plasticity Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/55v4x159 Author de Vera, Giorgio Tantuan Publication Date 2016 Peer reviewed|Thesis/dissertation eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Lagrangian and Eulerian Forms of Finite Plasticity By Giorgio Tantuan De Vera A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Engineering – Mechanical Engineering in the Graduate Division of the University of California, Berkeley Committee in charge: Professor James Casey, Co-chair Professor George C. Johnson, Co-chair Professor Oliver M. O’Reilly Professor Filippos Filippou Fall 2016 Lagrangian and Eulerian Forms of Finite Plasticity Copyright 2016 by Giorgio Tantuan De Vera Abstract Lagrangian and Eulerian Forms of Finite Plasticity by Giorgio Tantuan De Vera Doctor of Philosophy in Mechanical Engineering University of California, Berkeley Professor James Casey, Co-chair Over the past half century, much work has been published on the theory of elastic-plastic materials undergoing large deformations. However, there is still disagreement about certain basic issues. In this dissertation, the strain-based Lagrangian theory developed by Green, Naghdi and co-workers is re-assessed. Its basic structure is found to be satisfactory. For the purpose of applications, the theory is recast in Eulerian form. Additionally, a novel three-factor multiplicative decomposition of the deformation gradient is employed to define a unique intermediate configuration. The resulting theory of finite plasticity contains an elastic strain tensor measured from the intermediate stress-free configuration. The consti- tutive equations involve the objective stress rate of the rotated Cauchy stress, which can be expressed in terms of the rate of deformation tensor.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    1 Elastic Domains: Yield Conditions 1.1. Introductory remarks Figure 1.1. Henri Tresca (1814–1885)1 honored on the North pillar of the Eiffel Tower One hundred and fifty years ago, Henri Tresca (Figure 1.1), then a Professor of applied mechanics at the Conservatoire des arts et métiers in Paris, submitted a series of memoirs to The French Academy of Sciences (Tresca 1864a, 1867a, 1867c, 1869a, 1870). They were devoted to recording the extensive series of experiments he had carried out investigating punching, rolling, forging, stamping and extruding processes of metals, where he had definitely identified a phenomenon; heCOPYRIGHTED called it the “fluidity” of metals MATERIAL subjected to very high pressures (Figure 1.2). 1 Archives of The French Academy of Sciences, Paris. 2 Elastoplastic Modeling Figure 1.2. “Flow of two iron slices, hot, under the action of a forging-hammer” In addition to the precise description of the experiments that were initially performed on various lead specimens and, afterwards, on other metals (copper, iron, tin and zinc) or materials (ceramics and modeling wax), Tresca had proposed a mechanical theory for the observed phenomena with his “Fundamental assumption as to the resistance to fluidity”, which he stated as follows (Figure 1.3): “Beyond this limit, we propose to consider, for the state of fluidity, that the forces that are developed are absolutely constant and entirely independent of the relative displacements, which amounts to admitting that they can always be evaluated by means of a resistance coefficient K per square meter or per square centimeter, this coefficient K remaining the same for the assessment of any molecular deformation developed during the fluidity period.” Elastic Domains: Yield Conditions 3 Figure 1.3.
    [Show full text]