Late Maritime Woodland (Ceramic) and Paleoindian End Scrapers: Stone Tool Technology Pamela J
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fogler Library 2001 Late Maritime Woodland (Ceramic) and Paleoindian End Scrapers: Stone Tool Technology Pamela J. Dickinson Follow this and additional works at: http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd Part of the Archaeological Anthropology Commons, Geomorphology Commons, and the Paleontology Commons Recommended Citation Dickinson, Pamela J., "Late Maritime Woodland (Ceramic) and Paleoindian End Scrapers: Stone Tool Technology" (2001). Electronic Theses and Dissertations. 659. http://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/etd/659 This Open-Access Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. LATE MARITIME WOODLAND (CERAMIC) AND PALEOINDIAN END SCRAPERS: STONE TOOL TECHNOLOGY BY Pamela J. Dickinson B. A. University of New Brunswick, 1993 A THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science (in Quaternary Studies) The Graduate School The University of Maine December, 200 1 Advisory Committee: David Sanger, Professor of Anthropology and Quaternary and Climate Studies, Advisor Daniel H. Sandweiss, Associate Professor of Anthropology and Quaternary and Climate Studies Woodrow Thompson, Physical Geologist, Maine Geological Survey LATE MARITIME WOODLAND (CERAMIC) AND PALEOINDIAN END SCRAPERS: STONE TOOL TECHNOLOGY By Pamela J. Dickinson Thesis Advisor: Dr. David Sanger An Abstract of the Thesis Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Science (in Quaternary Studies) December, 2001 Archaeologists tend to view lithic assemblages from a predominately morphological perspective, stressing the importance of the fluted point as the defining characteristic of the Paleoindian culture period (ca. 10,000 years B.P.). In applying such a characteristic, Paleoindian sites have been identified throughout the Northeast. However, there are no identified Paleoindian sites in New Brunswick. It is possible that some sites are largely ignored or thought to lack a Paleoindian component if a fluted point is absent. If such sites are being overlooked, then the database may under represent the Paleoindian culture period. Spurred end scrapers commonly occur in known Paleoindian tool assemblages and are often considered diagnostic of the Paleoindian culture period. However, spurred end scrapers have also been identified in the Late Maritime Woodland (Ceramic) culture period (ca. 500 years B.P.). I designed the present study to determine if spurred end scrapers from known Paleoindian and Late Maritime Woodland period sites can be differentiated and be diagnostic of a specific culture period. A morphological and technological analysis of spurred end scrapers allowed me to complete a controlled comparative lithic study of the two culture groups. An analysis of the spurred end scrapers from the four sites indicates similarities between culture periods in the type of lithic materials employed in tool production as well as in the initial stages of core technology. Technological variability in the form of a longitudinal flake occurs on Paleoindian spurs. I then applied the similarity and variability identified between culture periods to two multi-component sites in New Brunswick that have spurred end scrapers that morphologically resemble those from the two Paleoindian sites analyzed. However, no other evidence of a Paleoindian component had been identified at the sites. The technological analysis of the spurred end scrapers fiom the New Brunswick sites has not determined that a Paleoindian component does exist, but suggests further investigation is warranted. It is the presence, not absence, of the longitudinal flake down the center of the spur that may be used as an indicator to distinguish Early Paleoindian from Late Maritime Woodland spurred end scrapers. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I am very pleased to have this opportunity to extend my appreciation to the many individuals and institutions who gave generous support in the preparation and completion of the present thesis. Financial support was provided by the Canadian-American Center (University of Maine) in the form of a Canadian-American Center Assistantship and a New England Atlantic Provinces Quebec Fellowship. Financial support was also provided by the Institute for Quaternary and Climate Studies (University of Maine) and the Association of Graduate Students. There are many individuals who have in one way or another contributed to the present research. Most importantly, I would like to thank my supervisor, Dr. David Sanger, for his academic guidance and advice during the course of my research. I am also indebted to the faculty and staff in the Quaternary Department for their assistance and support during course work, presentations, and in the preparation of my thesis. Additional thanks goes to Dr. Kristen Sobolik, Dr. Jim Roscoe, and Steve Bicknell. Special thanks goes to Dr. Daniel Sandweiss and Dr. Woodrow Thompson (Physical Geologist, Maine Geological Survey) for generously agreeing to be on my thesis committee and spending the time to review critically the content and writing of my thesis. My fellow colleagues and graduate students provided numerous discussions and support; they include: Alexandra Sumner, Jason Jeandron, Ben Tanner, Edward Moore, Karen Mack, and Dr. Rick Will. I am especially indebted to Alice Kelley and Dr. Brian Robinson for numerous discussions that allowed me to tap into their knowledge, and for making me feel at home in Maine. The present research required that I travel to New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Ottawa, which allowed me access to Early Paleoindian and Late Maritime Woodland collections used in this research. There are many people in all of these places to whom I owe my gratitude. In New Brunswick I would like to thank Dr. Chris Turnbull, Pat Allen, Albert Ferguson, and Karen Perley at Archaeological Services New Brunswick. I must also thank Dr. Allen Seaman, Quaternary Geologist, Natural Resources and Energy, for his assistance. I would also like to extend my gratitude to Dr. David Black at the University of New Brunswick for continued support. A special thanks goes to Sue Blair for numerous discussions on archaeology, and her support from beginning to end, and beyond. In Nova Scotia I would like to thank Steve Powell and Dr. David Christianson at the Nova Scotia Museum for providing access to and the loan of a portion of the Shubenacadie 3 and 5 collections, and to Dr. Stephen Davis at St. Mary's University for access and loan of a portion of the Belmont I1 collection. In Ottawa I would like to thank Dr. David Keenlyside at the Canadian Museum of Civilization (CMC) for providing access to, and the loan and shipment of a portion of the Debert collection as well as giving freely of his time while I was at the CMC. TABLE OF CONTENTS .. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS .............................................................................................. 11 ... LIST OF TABLES .......................................................................................................... viii ... LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................... xiii Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................... 1 Problem Statement .....................................................................................1 Objectives ................................................................................................... -2 Theoretical Approach ................................................................................... 6 2 . BACKGROUND ..................................................................................................... 8 Prehistory of the Study Area and Vicinity (10,OO 0.1 1. 000 years B.P.) .......8 Early Paleoindian Sites in the Maritime Provinces and the State of Maine .............................................................................................. 8 Current Research on the Early Paleoindian Culture Period .........................9 Current Research on the Late Maritime Woodland Culture Period ...........12 Current Research Pertaining to Early Paleoindian Stone Tools ................13 History of Selected Sites .......................................................................... 13 Debert Site (BiCu-1) ...................................................................... 13 Belmont I1 Site (BiCu-7) ............................................................... 14 Shubenacadie 3 Site (BfCv-3) ....................................................... 15 Shubenacadie 5 Site (BfCv-5) ....................................................... 16 Jemseg Site (BkDm-14) ..............................................................16 Bentley Street Site (BhDm-2) ........................................................ 17 Environmental Setting ............................................................................... 18 Physiography ......................................................................................... 18 Bedrock Geology ....................................................................................... 20 Soils ........................................................................................................... 21 Glacial History ..........................................................................................