DOCSLIB.ORG

Designation of Trail Corridors and Associated Staging Areas Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Designation of Trail Corridors and Associated Staging Areas Project MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION / INITIAL STUDY AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM PREPARED FOR SONOMA COUNTY AGRICULTURAL PRESERVATION AND OPEN SPACE DISTRICT Estero Trail Easement: Designation of Trail Corridors and Associated Staging Areas Project PCAS # QE441300 October 2016 Prepared by Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department Environmental Review Division 2550 Ventura Avenue Santa Rosa, California 95403 Mitigated Negative Declaration Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department 2550 Ventura Avenue, Santa Rosa, CA 95403 (707) 565-1900 FAX (707) 565-1103 Pursuant to Section 15071 of the State CEQA Guidelines, this summary of findings and the attached Initial Study and mitigations constitute the Mitigated Negative Declaration as proposed for or adopted by the Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District for the project described below: Project Title: Estero Trail Easement: Designation of Trail Corridors and Staging Areas Project Project Location Address: 17000 Valley Ford Cutoff/Highway 1, Valley Ford, Sonoma County Assessor Parcel Number 026-030-011 Lead Agency: Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District Decision Making Body: Board of Directors of the Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District Project Proponent: Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District Project Description: The Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District (District) proposes to designate trail corridors and associated staging areas pursuant to an existing trail easement within an existing conservation easement. Environmental Finding: The District has determined, on the basis of the attached Initial Study that the project described above will not have a substantial adverse impact on the environment, provided that the mitigation measures identified in the Initial Study are included in the project. Initial Study: See attached. For more information, call Sheri Emerson at 707-565- 7358. Mitigation Measures: Included in attached Initial Study. The project proponent, the District, has agreed to ensure that all mitigation measures are implemented. TABLE OF CONTENTS Contents INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 2 PROJECT LOCATION AND EXISTING CONDITIONS ........................................ 3 PURPOSE AND NEED FOR THE PROJECT....................................................... 4 FUTURE USES..................................................................................................... 4 Project Background ............................................................................................ 5 PROJECT DESCRIPTION .................................................................................... 5 Site Operations .................................................................................................. 7 ISSUES RAISED BY THE PUBLIC OR AGENCIES ........................................... 11 RESPONSIBLE, TRUSTEE, AND PERMITING AGENCIES .............................. 11 Initial Study Checklist .......................................................................................... 13 1. AESTHETICS .............................................................................................. 13 2. AGRICULTURE AND FOREST RESOURCES ............................................ 14 3. AIR QUALITY ............................................................................................... 16 4. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ........................................................................ 20 5. CULTURAL RESOURCES .......................................................................... 53 6. GEOLOGY AND SOILS ............................................................................... 55 7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS .............................................................. 58 8. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS............................................... 59 9. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY ....................................................... 62 10. LAND USE AND PLANNING ..................................................................... 65 11. MINERAL RESOURCES ........................................................................... 66 12. NOISE ........................................................................................................ 67 13. POPULATION AND HOUSING .................................................................. 69 14. PUBLIC SERVICES ................................................................................... 70 15. RECREATION ........................................................................................... 71 16. TRANSPORTATION / TRAFFIC ................................................................ 72 17. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS ....................................................... 75 18. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE .......................................... 77 Sources ............................................................................................................... 79 APPENDIX A. WILDLIFE ASSESSMENT APPENDIX B. RARE PLANT/WETLAND HABITAT ASSESSMENT List of Figures Figure 1. Location Map Figure 2. Site Plan Figure 3. Aerial View Estero Trail Easement Designation October 2016 Initial Study 1 Estero Trail Easement Designation October 2016 Initial Study 2 INTRODUCTION The Sonoma County Agricultural Preservation and Open Space District (District) holds both a conservation easement (Conservation Easement) and a public trail easement (Trail Easement) on property located on Valley Ford Cutoff, west of the town of Valley Ford, and owned by Alfred and Joseph Bordessa (Bordessa Ranch). The purpose of the Conservation Easement is to preserve and protect the Conservation Values of the property, including natural resources, habitat connectivity, open space and scenic views, agricultural resources, and recreation and education. The purpose of the Trail Easement is to ensure that trail corridors and associated staging areas are established and made available to the public in perpetuity for low-intensity public outdoor recreational and educational purposes consistent with the Conservation Easement. Under the terms of the Trail Easement, the District must designate and survey the precise locations of two 50-foot-wide pedestrian-only trail corridors, not to exceed 5 miles in length, and two staging areas, not to exceed 1.5 acres in total combined area. The District is partnering with the Sonoma County Regional Parks Department (Regional Parks) to determine the appropriate location of the trail corridors and associated staging areas. The District is acting as the lead agency for purposes of environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). The District has contracted with Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department (PRMD) to assist in that environmental review. The sole action to be taken at this time is the District’s designation and recordation of the trail corridors and associated staging areas pursuant to the Trail Easement (the Project). Design and construction of the staging areas and the future trail alignment (anticipated to be approximately 5 feet wide) within the trail corridors will occur at a later date and will be subject to further environmental review. Under the terms of the Trail Easement, the District may designate another public agency or nonprofit organization as the Operating Entity to design, construct, operate, and maintain the trail and associated staging areas. The Operating Entity will be a responsible agency for purposes of environmental review under CEQA. This informational document has been prepared by PRMD staff to identify the potential environmental impacts of a pedestrian-use-only trail system at the site, and will be used by project decision-makers, responsible and trustee agencies under CEQA, and the public. The Initial Study describes and analyzes the likely impacts of designating the trail corridors and staging areas, as well as future construction, operation, and maintenance of the proposed trail. A trail plan identifying the precise location of the future trail alignment within the trail corridors and possible restrictions on the level of use has not yet been prepared. Therefore, the analysis of potential impacts associated with future construction, operation and maintenance of the proposed trail is necessarily programmatic in nature based on the information available at this time. Additional environmental Estero Trail Easement Designation October 2016 Initial Study 2 review will occur in conjunction with the trail planning process. The District, in consultation with Regional Parks, has reviewed the information regarding the proposed trail corridors and staging areas and other project details and has determined that it is appropriate to prepare an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. A Mitigated Negative Declaration may be adopted if the project would result in less than significant impacts with mitigation measures incorporated into the project. This report is the Initial Study required by CEQA. The report was prepared by Rich Stabler, Senior Environmental Specialist with the Sonoma County Permit and Resource Management Department (PRMD), Environmental Review Division. Information on the project was provided by Sheri Emerson and Jacob Newell of the District and Karen Davis-Brown and Steve Ehret of Regional Parks. Technical studies referred to in this document are available for
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Conceptual Design Documentation
    Appendix A: Conceptual Design Documentation APPENDIX A Conceptual Design Documentation June 2019 A-1 APPENDIX A: CONCEPTUAL DESIGN DOCUMENTATION The environmental analyses in the NEPA and CEQA documents for the proposed improvements at Oceano County Airport (the Airport) are based on conceptual designs prepared to provide a realistic basis for assessing their environmental consequences. 1. Widen runway from 50 to 60 feet 2. Widen Taxiways A, A-1, A-2, A-3, and A-4 from 20 to 25 feet 3. Relocate segmented circle and wind cone 4. Installation of taxiway edge lighting 5. Installation of hold position signage 6. Installation of a new electrical vault and connections 7. Installation of a pollution control facility (wash rack) CIVIL ENGINEERING CALCULATIONS The purpose of this conceptual design effort is to identify the amount of impervious surface, grading (cut and fill) and drainage implications of the projects identified above. The conceptual design calculations detailed in the following figures indicate that Projects 1 and 2, widening the runways and taxiways would increase the total amount of impervious surface on the Airport by 32,016 square feet, or 0.73 acres; a 6.6 percent increase in the Airport’s impervious surface area. Drainage patterns would remain the same as both the runway and taxiways would continue to sheet flow from their centerlines to the edge of pavement and then into open, grassed areas. The existing drainage system is able to accommodate the modest increase in stormwater runoff that would occur, particularly as soil conditions on the Airport are conducive to infiltration. Figure A-1 shows the locations of the seven projects incorporated in the Proposed Action.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix E Water Resources Technical Report
    Appendix E Water Resources Technical Report 1330 West Pico Blvd Project Water Resources Technical Report July 17, 2018 Prepared by: David J. Curtis, P.E., ENV SP PSOMAS 555 South Flower Street, Suite 4300 Los Angeles, California 90071 (213) 223-1400 (213) 223-1444 Fax Prepared for: Sandstone Properties 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 3 1.1 Project Description ........................................................................................ 3 1.2 Scope of Work ............................................................................................... 3 2.0 Surface Water Hydrology ...................................................................................... 3 2.1 General Approach ........................................................................................... 3 2.2 Data Sources .................................................................................................. 3 2.3 Existing Site Conditions .................................................................................. 4 2.4 Proposed Site Conditions ............................................................................... 4 2.5 Hydrology Results ........................................................................................... 4 3.0 Surface Water Quality ............................................................................................ 5 3.1 General Approach ........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plant List
    UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve Plants Below is the most recently updated plant list for UCSC Fort Ord Natural Reserve. * non-native taxon ? presence in question Listed Species Information: CNPS Listed - as designated by the California Rare Plant Ranks (formerly known as CNPS Lists). More information at http://www.cnps.org/cnps/rareplants/ranking.php Cal IPC Listed - an inventory that categorizes exotic and invasive plants as High, Moderate, or Limited, reflecting the level of each species' negative ecological impact in California. More information at http://www.cal-ipc.org More information about Federal and State threatened and endangered species listings can be found at https://www.fws.gov/endangered/ (US) and http://www.dfg.ca.gov/wildlife/nongame/ t_e_spp/ (CA). FAMILY NAME SCIENTIFIC NAME COMMON NAME LISTED Ferns AZOLLACEAE - Mosquito Fern American water fern, mosquito fern, Family Azolla filiculoides ? Mosquito fern, Pacific mosquitofern DENNSTAEDTIACEAE - Bracken Hairy brackenfern, Western bracken Family Pteridium aquilinum var. pubescens fern DRYOPTERIDACEAE - Shield or California wood fern, Coastal wood wood fern family Dryopteris arguta fern, Shield fern Common horsetail rush, Common horsetail, field horsetail, Field EQUISETACEAE - Horsetail Family Equisetum arvense horsetail Equisetum telmateia ssp. braunii Giant horse tail, Giant horsetail Pentagramma triangularis ssp. PTERIDACEAE - Brake Family triangularis Gold back fern Gymnosperms CUPRESSACEAE - Cypress Family Hesperocyparis macrocarpa Monterey cypress CNPS - 1B.2, Cal IPC
    [Show full text]
  • NEW SPECIES of GAMOCHAETA (ASTERACEAE: GNAPHALIEAE) from the EASTERN UNITED STATES and COMMENTS on SIMILAR SPECIES Guy L
    NEW SPECIES OF GAMOCHAETA (ASTERACEAE: GNAPHALIEAE) FROM THE EASTERN UNITED STATES AND COMMENTS ON SIMILAR SPECIES Guy L. Nesom Botanical Research Institute of Texas 509 Pecan Street Fort Worth, Texas 76102-4060, U.S.A. ABSTRACT Gamochaeta argyrinea Nesom, sp. nov., is documented from 19 states, primarily in the southeastern U.S.A., and from Puerto Rico. It is a common and abundant species of ruderal habitats and has usu- ally been identified within a broad concept of Gamochaeta purpurea, which has a similar but broader geographic range. Gamochaeta argyrinea apparently is most closely similar to G. ustulata, another species commonly identified as G. purpurea but native to the Pacific coast region of the U.S.A. and adjacent Canada. Gamochaeta chionesthes Nesom, sp. nov., is described from localities in Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, and North Carolina—these plants also have been identified previously primarily as G. purpurea. A key and distribution maps are pro- vided for the six species of Gamochaeta in the U.S.A. with strongly bicolored leaves: G. argyrinea, G. ustulata, G. chionesthes, G. purpurea, G. simplicicaulis, and G. coarctata. The name Gamochaeta americana has been misapplied to G. coarctata, but G. americana sensu stricto has not been docu- mented for the U.S.A.; it occurs in the Antilles, Central America, Mexico, and South America and is reported to occur elsewhere as an adventive. In order to further clarify its identity, a technical de- scription and commentary are provided for G. americana. RESUMEN Se documenta Gamochaeta argyrinea Nesom, sp. nov., de 19 estados, principalmente del Sureste de U.S.A., y de Puerto Rico.
    [Show full text]
  • Recovery Plan for the Santa Rosa Plain
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Recovery Plan for the Santa Rosa Plain Blennosperma bakeri (Sonoma sunshine) Lasthenia burkei (Burke’s goldfields) Limnanthes vinculans (Sebastopol meadowfoam) California tiger salamander Sonoma County Distinct Population Segment (Ambystoma californiense) Lasthenia burkei Blennosperma bakeri Limnanthes vinculans Jo-Ann Ordano J. E. (Jed) and Bonnie McClellan Jo-Ann Ordano © 2004 California Academy of Sciences © 1999 California Academy of Sciences © 2005 California Academy of Sciences Sonoma County California Tiger Salamander Gerald Corsi and Buff Corsi © 1999 California Academy of Sciences Disclaimer Recovery plans delineate reasonable actions that are believed to be required to recover and/or protect listed species. We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, publish recovery plans, sometimes preparing them with the assistance of recovery teams, contractors, state agencies, Tribal agencies, and other affected and interested parties. Objectives will be attained and any necessary funds made available subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved, as well as the need to address other priorities. Costs indicated for action implementation and time of recovery are estimates and subject to change. Recovery plans do not obligate other parties to undertake specific actions, and may not represent the views or the official positions of any individuals or agencies involved in recovery plan formulation, other than the Service. Recovery plans represent our official position only after they have been signed by the Director or Regional Director as approved. Approved recovery plans are subject to modification as dictated by new findings, changes in species status, and the completion of recovery actions. LITERATURE CITATION SHOULD READ AS FOLLOWS: U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • MARIN COUNTY LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Land Use Plan
    MARIN COUNTY LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM Land Use Plan Board of Supervisors Adopted August 25, 2015 & April 19, 2016 1. The changes approved by the California Coastal Commission on May 15, 2014 agreed to by the County have been “accepted” (i.e. not shown in track changes) 2. Modification to LUP text approved by the Marin County Board of Supervisor on August 25, 2015 and April 19, 206 are shown in blue text (double-underlined for additions and italized strike out for deletions). Marin County Board of Supervisors Judy Arnold, President, District #5 Kathrin Sears, Vice-President, District #3 Katie Rice, 2nd Vice President, District #2 Susan L. Adams, District #1 Steve Kinsey, District #4 Prepared by the Marin County Community Development Agency Brian C. Crawford, Director This report is funded in part with qualified outer continental shelf oil and gas revenues by the Coastal Impact Assistance Program, Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation, and Enforcement, U.S. Department of the Interior. Marin County Local Coastal Program Project Staff Tom Lai, Assistant Director Jack Liebster, Principal Planner Kristin Drumm, Senior Planner Christine Gimmler, Senior Planner Jeremy Tejirian, Principal Planner Alisa Stevenson, Assistant Planner Suzanne Thorsen, Planner Steve Scholl, Consulting Planner Copies of this report may be obtained by contacting the Marin County Community Development Agency 3501 Civic Center Drive, Room 308 San Rafael, CA 94903 Phone (415) 499-6269 [email protected] www.MarinLCP.org ii Land Use Plan Amendments Marin County Local Coastal Program Table of Contents Introduction ................................................................................................................................................. 1 Interpretation of the Land Use Plan ......................................................................................................... 5 Natural Systems and Agriculture Agriculture (AG) ..........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnohistory and Ethnogeography of the Coast Miwok and Their Neighbors, 1783-1840
    ETHNOHISTORY AND ETHNOGEOGRAPHY OF THE COAST MIWOK AND THEIR NEIGHBORS, 1783-1840 by Randall Milliken Technical Paper presented to: National Park Service, Golden Gate NRA Cultural Resources and Museum Management Division Building 101, Fort Mason San Francisco, California Prepared by: Archaeological/Historical Consultants 609 Aileen Street Oakland, California 94609 June 2009 MANAGEMENT SUMMARY This report documents the locations of Spanish-contact period Coast Miwok regional and local communities in lands of present Marin and Sonoma counties, California. Furthermore, it documents previously unavailable information about those Coast Miwok communities as they struggled to survive and reform themselves within the context of the Franciscan missions between 1783 and 1840. Supplementary information is provided about neighboring Southern Pomo-speaking communities to the north during the same time period. The staff of the Golden Gate National Recreation Area (GGNRA) commissioned this study of the early native people of the Marin Peninsula upon recommendation from the report’s author. He had found that he was amassing a large amount of new information about the early Coast Miwoks at Mission Dolores in San Francisco while he was conducting a GGNRA-funded study of the Ramaytush Ohlone-speaking peoples of the San Francisco Peninsula. The original scope of work for this study called for the analysis and synthesis of sources identifying the Coast Miwok tribal communities that inhabited GGNRA parklands in Marin County prior to Spanish colonization. In addition, it asked for the documentation of cultural ties between those earlier native people and the members of the present-day community of Coast Miwok. The geographic area studied here reaches far to the north of GGNRA lands on the Marin Peninsula to encompass all lands inhabited by Coast Miwoks, as well as lands inhabited by Pomos who intermarried with them at Mission San Rafael.
    [Show full text]
  • Biological Resources Assessment
    Ambient Communities LLC Orcutt Area Specific Plan Project Jones and Imel Properties, San Luis Obispo County, California Biological Resources Assessment August 2014 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ASSESSMENT ORCUTT AREA SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT JONES AND IMEL PROPERTIES, SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Prepared for: Ambient Communities LLC 979 Osos Street, Suite E San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 Prepared by: Rincon Consultants, Inc. 1530 Monterey Street, Suite D San Luis Obispo, CA 93401 August 2014 This report was produced on 50% recycled paper with 50% post-consumer content. Orcutt Area Specific Plan Project: Jones and Imel Properties Biological Resources Assessment Table of Contents Page Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................... 1 Section 1 – Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 2 1.1 Project Location .......................................................................................................................... 2 1.2 Project Description ..................................................................................................................... 2 Section 2 – Methodology ........................................................................................................................... 6 2.1 Regulatory Overview ...............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • THIRD BIENNIAL STATE of TOMALES BAY CONFERENCE, 1992 AGENDA October 24, 1992 9:00 AM to 4:40 PM 9:00 Registration 9:30 Welcom
    THIRD BIENNIAL STATE OF TOMALES BAY CONFERENCE, 1992 AGENDA October 24, 1992 9:00 AM to 4:40 PM 9:00 Registration 9:30 Welcome: John Grissim, Environmental Action Committee of West Marin 9:35 Keynote: Skip Schwartz, Audubon Canyon Ranch 9:50 Summation of First Two Conferences: Bruce Wyatt, U.C. Cooperative Extension Sea Grant Program 10:10 Current Issues Facing Tomales Bay: Richard Plant 10:30 State Government & Bay Protection: Senator Milton Marks 10:40 The Role of County Government and the Coastal Commission: Supervisor Gary Giacomini 10:50 My Front Yard: Clayton Lewis 11:00 Break: Refreshments 11:15 Water Quality Panel: Guest Moderator, Steve Eabry 12:35 Poetry: Dr. Michael Whitt 12:45 Lunch (provided) 1:45 Citizen Stewardship for Tomales Bay: Michael Herz, San Francisco Baykeeper 2:15 Research Panel: Guest Moderator, Jules Evens 3:35 Break: Refreshments 3:50 Tomales Bay Poetry/Song: Rhiannon 4:00 Herding Fleas: Steve Eabry, Coordinator Morro Bay Task Force 4:30 Concluding Remarks: Suzanne d'Coney, Conference Coordinator THIRD BIENNIAL STATE OF TOMALES BAY CONFERENCE 1992 TABLE OF CONTENTS A Summary of the Past Two Conferences: Bruce Wyatt…………………………..………. 10 Water Quality Panel: Moderator, Steve Eabry Suntan Lotion and Other Impacts Affecting Tomales Bay: Richard Plant…………. 12 Programs and Practices for the Protection of Tomales Bay: Richard H. Bennett Ph.D……………………………………………………. 16 California Department of Fish & Game: Activities and Plans: Mike Rugg……............…… 19 California Regional Water Quality Control Board Activities and Plans Dale Hopkins…………………………………………………………….….. 21 California Department of Health Services Preharvest Shellfish Sanitation Program Gregg W. Langlois………………………………………………………….. 24 National Marine Sanctuary Protection in the Area: Edward Ueber………………… 26 Marin- Sonoma Dairy Waste Committee: Joe Mendoza…………………………….
    [Show full text]
  • Vascular Plants of Humboldt Bay's Dunes and Wetlands Published by U.S
    Vascular Plants of Humboldt Bay's Dunes and Wetlands Published by U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service G. Leppig and A. Pickart and California Department of Fish Game Release 4.0 June 2014* www.fws.gov/refuge/humboldt_bay/ Habitat- Habitat - Occurs on Species Status Occurs within Synonyms Common name specific broad Lanphere- Jepson Manual (2012) (see codes at end) refuge (see codes at end) (see codes at end) Ma-le'l Units UD PW EW Adoxaceae Sambucus racemosa L. red elderberry RF, CDF, FS X X N X X Aizoaceae Carpobrotus chilensis (Molina) sea fig DM X E X X N.E. Br. Carpobrotus edulis ( L.) N.E. Br. Iceplant DM X E, I X Alismataceae lanceleaf water Alisma lanceolatum With. FM X E plantain northern water Alisma triviale Pursh FM X N plantain Alliaceae three-cornered Allium triquetrum L. FS, FM, DM X X E leek Allium unifolium Kellogg one-leaf onion CDF X N X X Amaryllidaceae Amaryllis belladonna L. belladonna lily DS, AW X X E Narcissus pseudonarcissus L. daffodil AW, DS, SW X X E X Anacardiaceae Toxicodendron diversilobum Torrey poison oak CDF, RF X X N X X & A. Gray (E. Greene) Apiaceae Angelica lucida L. seacoast angelica BM X X N, C X X Anthriscus caucalis M. Bieb bur chevril DM X E Cicuta douglasii (DC.) J. Coulter & western water FM X N Rose hemlock Conium maculatum L. poison hemlock RF, AW X I X Daucus carota L. Queen Anne's lace AW, DM X X I X American wild Daucus pusillus Michaux DM, SW X X N X X carrot Foeniculum vulgare Miller sweet fennel AW, FM, SW X X I X Glehnia littoralis (A.
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations
    JOINT MANAGEMENT PLAN REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS From JMPR Working Groups & Internal Teams to the Gulf of the Farallones SANCTUARY ADVISORY COUNCIL July 2003 JOINT MANAGEMENT PLAN REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS From JMPR Working Groups and Internal Teams to the Gulf of the Farallones SANCTUARY ADVISORY COUNCIL JULY 2003 MAP OF STUDY AREA…. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS…. Part I – Introduction and Background Background Gulf of the Farallones National Marine Sanctuary..…………………………….…6 Overview of JMPR Process ………………………………………...…………….…6 Priority Issue Working Groups Working Group Tasks and Products……………………….…………………….….6 Working Group Selection and Role of GFNMS Staff.………………..….…..……7 GFNMS Working Groups…………………………………….………………...…..….7 Working Group Decision Making……………………….……………………………7 Prioritization of Working Group Recommendations….……………………………7 About this Document……………………………………………………………………………8 JMPR Timeline…………………………………………..…………………………………..…10 Next Steps……………………………………………………….………………………….…..11 Part II- Site-Specific Working Group Recommendations Water Quality………………………………………………………………………………..….13 MAP- Water Quality. …………………………………………..…………………….29 MAP-Tomales Bay Water Quality and Mariculture. ………..……………….….30 MAP-Land Cover ……………………………………..……………………………...31 Water Quality Inventory Matrix…………………………………………………..…32 Water Quality Ranking Matrix………………………………………………………39 Wildlife Disturbance……………………………………………………………………………46 MAP-Coastal Access Points………………………………………………………..59 Wildlife Disturbance Inventory Matrix……………………………………………..60 Wildlife Disturbance Ranking Matrix………………………………………………65
    [Show full text]
  • Vegetation Classification, Descriptions, and Mapping of The
    Vegetation Classification, Descriptions, and Mapping of the Clear Creek Management Area, Joaquin Ridge, Monocline Ridge, and Environs in San Benito and Western Fresno Counties, California Prepared By California Native Plant Society And California Department of Fish and Game Final Report Project funded by Funding Source: Resource Assessment Program California Department of Fish and Game And Funding Source: Resources Legacy Fund Foundation Grant Project Name: Central Coast Mapping Grant #: 2004-0173 February 2006 Vegetation Classification, Descriptions, and Mapping of the Clear Creek Management Area, Joaquin Ridge, Monocline Ridge, and Environs in San Benito and Western Fresno Counties, California Final Report February 2006 Principal Investigators: California Native Plant Society staff: Julie Evens, Senior Vegetation Ecologist Anne Klein, Vegetation Ecologist Jeanne Taylor, Vegetation Assistant California Department of Fish and Game staff: Todd Keeler-Wolf, Ph.D., Senior Vegetation Ecologist Diana Hickson, Senior Biologist (Botany) Addresses: California Native Plant Society 2707 K Street, Suite 1 Sacramento, CA 95816 California Department of Fish and Game Biogeographic Data Branch 1807 13th Street, Suite 202 Sacramento, CA 95814 Reviewers: Bureau of Land Management: Julie Anne Delgado, Botanist California State University: John Sawyer, Professor Emeritus TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................................. 1 BACKGROUND...........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]