JAKO198213464447949.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

JAKO198213464447949.Pdf 66 Bulletin of Korean Chemical Society, Vol. 3, No. 2t 1982 J니 ng—Hyu Shin (17) K. Shinoda, T. Hayashi, T. Yoshida, K. Sakai A. Nakajima, Biopolymers. 17, 805 (1978). Polym. J.r 8, 202 (1976). (26) H. Fukuda Y. Kiku아 li. Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn. 51, 1142 (18) K. P. Schodt and J. Blackwell, Biopolymers, 15, 469 (1978). (1976). (27) K. Abe, H. Ohno A. Nii and E. Tsuchida, MakromoL Chem., (19) M. Hosono, S. Sugii, 0. Kusudo and W. Tsuji, Kobunshi 179, 2043 (1973). Ronbunshu. 33/ 509 (1976). (28) T. Kdmoto, Y. Kojima and T. Kawai, MacromoL Chem., (20) Y. Kiku아 li, Y. Onishi, M. Kodama, J. Appl. Polym. Sci.. 179, 1861 (1978). 20, 3205 (1976). (29) A. Nakajima and S. Tanaka, Polym. Prepr. Japan, 17, (21) K. Abe. M. Koide and E. Tsuchida, Polym. J., 9, 73 (1977). 473 (1968). (22) K. Abe and E. Tsuchida, Polym. J., 9, 79 (1977). (30) K. Itoh, B. M. Foxman and G. D. Fasman, Biopolymers, (23) H. Fukuda and Y. Kik니아 li, MakromoL Chem.t 178, 2895 15, 419 (1976). (1977). (31) N. Greenfield and G. D. FasnMn, Biochemistry, 8, 4108 (24) S. Sugii, M. Hosono and R. Kitamaru, Kobunshi Ron- (1969). bunshu, 35, 441 (1978). (32) C. W. Bunn, Nature, 161> 929 (1948). (25) S. Hirano, C. Mizutani, R. Yamaguchi and O. Miura, Direct Observation of an Antihomoaromatic Bicyclooctadienyl Cation Jung-Hyu Shin Department of Chemistry, Seoul National University, Seoul 151, Korea (Received February 2, 1982) The question of the bicyclohomoaromatic stabilization and destabilization is examined. The chemistry of bicyclo (3. 2. 1.) octa-3, 6-dienide anion has been studied on order to test these concepts. The bicyclooctadienide anion is shown to be stable delocalized ion which undergoes a facile proton-deuterium exchange reaction. The solvolysis of bicyclo (3.2.1) octa-3,6 -dienyl p-nitrobenzoate is much slower than the monoene analog. We have made direct observation of the bicycloocata- dienyl and octenyl cations by 19F-nmr spectroscopy, and were able to demonstrate that the bicyclooctadienyl cation was bishomoantiaromatic. about the long-range stabilization of ionic centers by remote Introduction carbons. One of the most fascinating concepts to develop The stabilization of carbonium ions and carbanions by from this interest was the theory of homoaromaticity5. means of cyclic charge delocalization or aromaticity is well Goldstein6 used MO symmetry arguments to extend the documented and universally accepted. concept of the homoaromatic ions to bicycloaromatic The cyclopropyl cation I1 and the cyclopentadienyl anion species. 22 are just two examples of a large number of the welJknown Bicyclo(3.2.1)octa-3,6~diene(5), previously reported by carbonium ions and carbanions whose unusual stability is Brown and Occolowitz7, is more reactive compared with the thought to be due to this effect. monoene analog 6 in allylic proton-deuterium exchange in DMSO-jBuOK. Molecular orbital symmetry arguments have suggested that anion 4 should also have enhanced stability. The iH—nmr spectrum of the bicyclohomopenta- 5 dienide anion 4 has been reported by Winstein8, and all of the features are in accordance with the delocalized six- ^-electron bishomaromatic species with appreciable ring currents. The rates of the solvolysis of the p-nitrobenzoates of bycyclo〔321〕octa—3,6—dienyl(7) and bicy이 。〔321〕 octenyl (8) in aqueous acetone have been studied by Diaz 3 4 6 and his coworkers9. Recently many evidences have been presented in support of Here, 나 le 6,7-double bond in 7 makes the intermediate a new stabilization mechanism for carbonium ions and cation a four-7r-electron antiaromatic species and, therefore, carbanions, generally known as homoaromaticity3. retards the reaction in contrast with monoene analog 8. The 7-norbornenyl cation 3 and the bicyclooctadienyl anion It occured to us that a study of the 19F-ninr and 13C-nmr 4 are considered to be homologs of 1 and 2, respectively, and spectra of the /j-fluorophenyl bicyclooctadienyl cation 9 their unusual stability has been attributed to homoaromaticity. and especially comparison of these spectra with those of Since the early work on the solvolysis of the cholestryl the /y-fluorophenyl bicyclooctenyl cation 10 would be chloride4, Winstein and his coworkers have been concerned ideally suited in providing the information about long- Direct Observation of an Antih이 Tioa「omatic Cation Bulletin of Korean Chemical Society, Vol. 3, No. 2, 1982 67 Results and Discussion The carbinols were prepared from the Grignard reagent and the corresponding ketones in dry ether. Preparation and properties of the carbinols are described in the Experimental Section. Assignment of resonance signals in the 1H-nmr spectra of the carbinols achieved by decoupling experiments a하 d by preparation of Eu (DPM)3 complexes, and that in the 13Cnmr spectra was confirmed by double-resonance experiments. Solution of carbonium ions 퍼 , ere prepared as follows. To a stirred mixture of fluorosulfonic acid and sulfuryl chloride, a solution of each carbinol in CD2C12 was added dropwise range— 兀一 interactions and homoantiaromaticity in the at -120°C in a special reaction apparatus. The spectra of octadienyl cation. The paraproton nuclear magnetic resonance the carbonium ions were unchanged from -120°C to -30° C chemical shift of the tertiary phenyl carbonium ions (Ila) and hence, recorded at -50° C. At -20° C 나 le carbonium ions could serve as a measure of the ^-electron demand of the carbonium ion center10. rearranged producing unknown species. In the nmr spectra of the carbonium ions, the absorption signals usually 아 lifted downfield compared with the carbionols. The chemical Ila. R=H shift differences of 나 le bicyclooctadienyl (I), bicy이 ooctenyl(II) lib. R=F and bicycloheptadienyl (III) cation relative to those of the corresponding precursors are summarized in Table 1. Although a linear correlation of the chemical shift value The olefinic protons (H6, H7) in I appeared at )7.27 and with the log of the calculated delocalization energies was 少 6.84 as a triplets, both protons shifting downfield by 0.63 observed over a range of carbonium ion stabilities, the and 0.83 ppm relative to H 6,7 in the corresponding carbinols. iH—nmr chemical shift was too insensitive for energy di­ These shifts are appreciably more downfield in contrast with fferences to be useful (in the neighborhood of 1 ppm/100 these for H 6,7 of III. kcal). On the other band, the signal for H8 of I shifted downfield The 19F-nmr spectroscopy is advantageous in view of its by 1.1 ppm illative to H8 in the corresponding carbinol. order of magnitude greater sensitivity to electron demands This value is about two times greater than that (0.5 ppm) (1 ppm/0.75 kcal) of the cation center (lib), and comparative for H8 of II. insensitivity to magnetic anisotropies of the solvent and This may be attributed to a small ring current effect, which molecule. is also manifested by bicyclo (3.2.1) octa-3,6-dienide anion. We are now able to calculate the homoantiaromatic desta­ Upfield shifts of the H8 protons in the octadienide anion bilization energy by comparing the 19F-nmr chemical shifts relative to corresponding diene by 1.1 ppm are attributed at of the octenyl and octadienyl cations. least partly to a ring-current effects11. This can be explained in term of the appreciable long range ^-interactions between TABLE 1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 19F-nmr 0, PPm) I a. -1.8 -2.4 -2.9 一 1.45 一 0.63 一 0.83 一 1.1 -1.18 一 0.67 一 39.51 b. + 0.65 -134.9 +0.938 -55.18 -11.2 一 0.23 -3.5 一 19.7 + 11.29 一 12.2 -5.6 一 13.5 exo. endo. II a. -2.2 一 2.62 一 2.98 — -1.03 一 0.35 一 0.5 一 1.3 一 0.62 -35.13 b. +0.5 -131.7 +7.7 -5-18 -9.6 +3.8 一 4.05 -7.0 + 13.28 一 12.6 -5.46 -12.2 in a. -1.78 -2.9 -3.23 —.38 -0.26 -0.47 a. iH-nuir (3, ppm); b. 13C-nmr 0, ppm) 68 Bulletin of Korean Chemical Society. Vol. 3, No. 2, 1982 Jung-Hyu Shin the vacant p-orbital of the cationic center and the 6,7-double in a special apparatus. The chemical shifts in and 13C- bond in I, which leads to a bishomocyclopentadienyl species. nmr spectra of carbonium ions were determined from re­ Strikingly, the upfield shift (+7.7 ppm) of C3 in II is much ferenced internal €02€12(|55.4, 53.6). The 19F-chemical iH-nmr spectra in I and II are comparable. The small shifts of the carbonium ions were taken up from computer greater than that(+O.938ppm) in I, while 나 ic shifts in analyzed data. unfield shift of C3 in I is the result of the inefficient allylic 1. Synthesis of Carbinols conjugation due to the unfavorable electrostatic interaction (1) p-Fluorophenyl bicyclo(3.2. T)octa-3fi-dien-2~ol. with the adjacent positive center, while the allylic conjugation Bicyclo(3.2.0)hex-2-en-6-endo-Cai-boxaldehyde (Z). To a is well facilitated. rapidly stirred suspension of 110g (1.12 mole) of anhydrous The greater positive charge on C2 of I compared with C2 sodium carbonate in the solution of 83.7 g (0.9 mole) of of II is also seen in the downfield 아 lifts (-134.9 and -137.7 bicyclo(2.2.1) heptadiene in 730 m/ of methylene chloride was ppm) of the carbons relative to the corresponding carbinols.
Recommended publications
  • Fundamental Studies of Early Transition Metal-Ligand Multiple Bonds: Structure, Electronics, and Catalysis
    Fundamental Studies of Early Transition Metal-Ligand Multiple Bonds: Structure, Electronics, and Catalysis Thesis by Ian Albert Tonks In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY Pasadena, California 2012 Defended December 6th 2011 ii 2012 Ian A Tonks All Rights Reserved iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I am extremely fortunate to have been surrounded by enthusiastic, dedicated, and caring mentors, colleagues, and friends throughout my academic career. A Ph.D. thesis is by no means a singular achievement; I wish to extend my wholehearted thanks to everyone who has made this journey possible. First and foremost, I must thank my Ph.D. advisor, Prof. John Bercaw. I think more so than anything else, I respect John for his character, sense of fairness, and integrity. I also benefitted greatly from John’s laissez-faire approach to guiding our research group; I’ve always learned best when left alone to screw things up, although John also has an uncanny ability for sensing when I need direction or for something to work properly on the high-vac line. John also introduced me to hiking and climbing in the Eastern Sierras and Owens Valley, which remain amongst my favorite places on Earth. Thanks for always being willing to go to the Pizza Factory in Lone Pine before and after all the group hikes! While I never worked on any of the BP projects that were spearheaded by our co-PI Dr. Jay Labinger, I must also thank Jay for coming to all of my group meetings, teaching me an incredible amount while I was TAing Ch154, and for always being willing to talk chemistry and answer tough questions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Chemistry of Alkynes
    14_BRCLoudon_pgs4-2.qxd 11/26/08 9:04 AM Page 644 14 14 The Chemistry of Alkynes An alkyne is a hydrocarbon containing a carbon–carbon triple bond; the simplest member of this family is acetylene, H C'C H. The chemistry of the carbon–carbon triple bond is similar in many respects toL that ofL the carbon–carbon double bond; indeed, alkynes and alkenes undergo many of the same addition reactions. Alkynes also have some unique chem- istry, most of it associated with the bond between hydrogen and the triply bonded carbon, the 'C H bond. L 14.1 NOMENCLATURE OF ALKYNES In common nomenclature, simple alkynes are named as derivatives of the parent compound acetylene: H3CCC' H L L methylacetylene H3CCC' CH3 dimethylacetyleneL L CH3CH2 CC' CH3 ethylmethylacetyleneL L Certain compounds are named as derivatives of the propargyl group, HC'C CH2 , in the common system. The propargyl group is the triple-bond analog of the allyl group.L L HC' C CH2 Cl H2CA CH CH2 Cl L L LL propargyl chloride allyl chloride 644 14_BRCLoudon_pgs4-2.qxd 11/26/08 9:04 AM Page 645 14.1 NOMENCLATURE OF ALKYNES 645 We might expect the substitutive nomenclature of alkynes to be much like that of alkenes, and it is. The suffix ane in the name of the corresponding alkane is replaced by the suffix yne, and the triple bond is given the lowest possible number. H3CCC' H CH3CH2CH2CH2 CC' CH3 H3C CH2 C ' CH L L L L L L L propyne 2-heptyne 1-butyne H3C CH C ' C CH3 HC' C CH2 CH2 C' C CH3 L L L L 1,5-heptadiyneLL L "CH3 4-methyl-2-pentyne Substituent groups that contain a triple bond (called alkynyl groups) are named by replac- ing the final e in the name of the corresponding alkyne with the suffix yl.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Bonding Valence Electrons Are the Outer Shell Electrons of an Atom
    Chapter 8 Chemical Bonding Valence electrons are the outer shell electrons of an atom. The valence electrons are the electrons that participate in chemical bonding. Group e- configuration # of valence e- 1 ns1 1 2 ns2 2 13 ns2np1 3 14 ns2np2 4 15 ns2np3 5 16 ns2np4 6 17 ns2np5 7 Lewis Dot Symbols for the Representative Elements & Noble Gases Lewis dot symbol consists of the symbol of the element and one dot for each valence electron in an atom of each element The Ionic Bond Ionic bond = the electrostatic force that holds ions Li + F Li+ F - together in an 2 1 2 2 5 [He]2[Ne]2 2 6 ionic compound 1s 2s1s 2s 2p 1s1s 2s 2p Li Li+ + e- e- + F F - Lithium fluoride, LiF Li+ + F - Li+ F - Ionic Bonds 3Mg (s) + N2 (g) → Mg3N2 (s) .. .. 2 3 3 Mg2 N 3Mg 2: N : (Mg3N2 ) . .. Electrostatic (Lattice) Energy Lattice energy (E) is the energy required to completely separate one mole of a solid ionic compound into gaseous ions. Coulomb’s Law: the potential energy between 2 ions is directly proportional to the product of their charges and inversely proportional to the distance of separation between them Q+ is the charge on the cation Q Q E = k + - Q is the charge on the anion r - r is the distance between the ions cmpd lattice energy MgF2 2957 Q= +2,-1 Lattice energy (E) increases MgO 3938 Q= +2,-2 as Q increases and/or as r decreases. LiF 1036 r F- < r Cl- LiCl 853 Born-Haber Cycle for Determining Lattice Energy The Born-Haber cycle relates lattice energies of ionic compounds to ionization energies, electron affinities, and other atomic & molecular properties o o o o o o DHoverall = DH1 + DH2 + DH3 + DH4 + DH5 Born-Haber cycle for lithium fluoride 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Basic Concepts of Chemical Bonding
    Basic Concepts of Chemical Bonding Cover 8.1 to 8.7 EXCEPT 1. Omit Energetics of Ionic Bond Formation Omit Born-Haber Cycle 2. Omit Dipole Moments ELEMENTS & COMPOUNDS • Why do elements react to form compounds ? • What are the forces that hold atoms together in molecules ? and ions in ionic compounds ? Electron configuration predict reactivity Element Electron configurations Mg (12e) 1S 2 2S 2 2P 6 3S 2 Reactive Mg 2+ (10e) [Ne] Stable Cl(17e) 1S 2 2S 2 2P 6 3S 2 3P 5 Reactive Cl - (18e) [Ar] Stable CHEMICAL BONDSBONDS attractive force holding atoms together Single Bond : involves an electron pair e.g. H 2 Double Bond : involves two electron pairs e.g. O 2 Triple Bond : involves three electron pairs e.g. N 2 TYPES OF CHEMICAL BONDSBONDS Ionic Polar Covalent Two Extremes Covalent The Two Extremes IONIC BOND results from the transfer of electrons from a metal to a nonmetal. COVALENT BOND results from the sharing of electrons between the atoms. Usually found between nonmetals. The POLAR COVALENT bond is In-between • the IONIC BOND [ transfer of electrons ] and • the COVALENT BOND [ shared electrons] The pair of electrons in a polar covalent bond are not shared equally . DISCRIPTION OF ELECTRONS 1. How Many Electrons ? 2. Electron Configuration 3. Orbital Diagram 4. Quantum Numbers 5. LEWISLEWIS SYMBOLSSYMBOLS LEWISLEWIS SYMBOLSSYMBOLS 1. Electrons are represented as DOTS 2. Only VALENCE electrons are used Atomic Hydrogen is H • Atomic Lithium is Li • Atomic Sodium is Na • All of Group 1 has only one dot The Octet Rule Atoms gain, lose, or share electrons until they are surrounded by 8 valence electrons (s2 p6 ) All noble gases [EXCEPT HE] have s2 p6 configuration.
    [Show full text]
  • Bond Distances and Bond Orders in Binuclear Metal Complexes of the First Row Transition Metals Titanium Through Zinc
    Metal-Metal (MM) Bond Distances and Bond Orders in Binuclear Metal Complexes of the First Row Transition Metals Titanium Through Zinc Richard H. Duncan Lyngdoh*,a, Henry F. Schaefer III*,b and R. Bruce King*,b a Department of Chemistry, North-Eastern Hill University, Shillong 793022, India B Centre for Computational Quantum Chemistry, University of Georgia, Athens GA 30602 ABSTRACT: This survey of metal-metal (MM) bond distances in binuclear complexes of the first row 3d-block elements reviews experimental and computational research on a wide range of such systems. The metals surveyed are titanium, vanadium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and zinc, representing the only comprehensive presentation of such results to date. Factors impacting MM bond lengths that are discussed here include (a) n+ the formal MM bond order, (b) size of the metal ion present in the bimetallic core (M2) , (c) the metal oxidation state, (d) effects of ligand basicity, coordination mode and number, and (e) steric effects of bulky ligands. Correlations between experimental and computational findings are examined wherever possible, often yielding good agreement for MM bond lengths. The formal bond order provides a key basis for assessing experimental and computationally derived MM bond lengths. The effects of change in the metal upon MM bond length ranges in binuclear complexes suggest trends for single, double, triple, and quadruple MM bonds which are related to the available information on metal atomic radii. It emerges that while specific factors for a limited range of complexes are found to have their expected impact in many cases, the assessment of the net effect of these factors is challenging.
    [Show full text]
  • Alkenes and Alkynes
    02/21/2019 CHAPTER FOUR Alkenes and Alkynes H N O I Cl C O C O Cl F3C C Cl C Cl Efavirenz Haloprogin (antiviral, AIDS therapeutic) (antifungal, antiseptic) Chapter 4 Table of Content * Unsaturated Hydrocarbons * Introduction and hybridization * Alkenes and Alkynes * Benzene and Phenyl groups * Structure of Alkenes, cis‐trans Isomerism * Nomenclature of Alkenes and Alkynes * Configuration cis/trans, and cis/trans Isomerism * Configuration E/Z * Physical Properties of Hydrocarbons * Acid‐Base Reactions of Hydrocarbons * pka and Hybridizations 1 02/21/2019 Unsaturated Hydrocarbons • Unsaturated Hydrocarbon: A hydrocarbon that contains one or more carbon‐carbon double or triple bonds or benzene‐like rings. – Alkene: contains a carbon‐carbon double bond and has the general formula CnH2n. – Alkyne: contains a carbon‐carbon triple bond and has the general formula CnH2n‐2. Introduction Alkenes ● Hydrocarbons containing C=C ● Old name: olefins • Steroids • Hormones • Biochemical regulators 2 02/21/2019 • Alkynes – Hydrocarbons containing C≡C – Common name: acetylenes Unsaturated Hydrocarbons • Arene: benzene and its derivatives (Ch 9) 3 02/21/2019 Benzene and Phenyl Groups • We do not study benzene and its derivatives until Chapter 9. – However, we show structural formulas of compounds containing a phenyl group before that time. – The phenyl group is not reactive under any of the conditions we describe in chapters 5‐8. Structure of Alkenes • The two carbon atoms of a double bond and the four atoms bonded to them lie in a plane, with bond angles of approximately 120°. 4 02/21/2019 Structure of Alkenes • Figure 4.1 According to the orbital overlap model, a double bond consists of one bond formed by overlap of sp2 hybrid orbitals and one bond formed by overlap of parallel 2p orbitals.
    [Show full text]
  • Representation of Three-Center−Two-Electron Bonds in Covalent Molecules with Bridging Hydrogen Atoms Gerard Parkin*
    Article Cite This: J. Chem. Educ. 2019, 96, 2467−2475 pubs.acs.org/jchemeduc Representation of Three-Center−Two-Electron Bonds in Covalent Molecules with Bridging Hydrogen Atoms Gerard Parkin* Department of Chemistry, Columbia University, New York, New York 10027, United States *S Supporting Information ABSTRACT: Many compounds can be represented well in terms of the two-center−two-electron (2c−2e) bond model. However, it is well-known that this approach has limitations; for example, certain compounds require the use of three- center−two-electron (3c−2e) bonds to provide an adequate description of the bonding. Although a classic example of a compound that features a 3c−2e bond is provided by − fi diborane, B2H6,3c 2e interactions also feature prominently in transition metal chemistry, as exempli ed by bridging hydride compounds, agostic compounds, dihydrogen complexes, and hydrocarbon and silane σ-complexes. In addition to being able to identify the different types of bonds (2c−2e and 3c−2e) present in a molecule, it is essential to be able to utilize these models to evaluate the chemical reasonableness of a molecule by applying the octet and 18-electron rules; however, to do so requires determination of the electron counts of atoms in molecules. Although this is easily achieved for molecules that possess only 2c− 2e bonds, the situation is more complex for those that possess 3c−2e bonds. Therefore, this article describes a convenient approach for representing 3c−2e interactions in a manner that facilitates the electron counting procedure for such compounds. In particular, specific attention is devoted to the use of the half-arrow formalism to represent 3c−2e interactions in compounds with bridging hydrogen atoms.
    [Show full text]
  • Bsc Chemistry
    Subject Chemistry Paper No and Title Paper 1: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY- I (Nature of Bonding and Stereochemistry) Module No and Module 3: Hyper-Conjugation Title Module Tag CHE_P1_M3 CHEMISTRY PAPER No. 1: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY- I (Nature of Bonding and Stereochemistry) Module No. 3: Hyper-Conjugation TABLE OF CONTENT 1. Learning outcomes 2. Introduction 3. Hyperconjugation 4. Requirements for Hyperconjugation 5. Consequences and Applications of Hyperconjugation 6. Reverse Hyperconjugation 7. Summary CHEMISTRY PAPER No. 1: ORGANIC CHEMISTRY- I (Nature of Bonding and Stereochemistry) Module No. 3: Hyper-Conjugation 1. Learning Outcomes After studying this module you shall be able to: Understand the concept of hyperconjugation. Know about the structural requirements in a molecule to show hyperconjugation. Learn about the important consequences and applications of hyperconjugation. Comprehend the concept of reverse hyperconjugation. 2. Introduction In conjugation, we have studied that the electrons move from one p orbital to other which are aligned in parallel planes. Is it possible for electron to jump from p orbital to sp3 orbital that are not parallelly aligned with one another? The answer is yes. This type of conjugation is not normal, it is extra-ordinary. Hence, the name hyper-conjugation. It is also know as no-bond resonance. Let us study more about it. 3. Hyperconjugation The normal electron releasing inductive effect (+I effect) of alkyl groups is in the following order: But it was observed by Baker and Nathan that in conjugated system, the attachment of alkyl groups reverse their capability of electron releasing. They suggested that alkyl groups are capable of releasing electrons by some process other than inductive.
    [Show full text]
  • Chemical Bonding Chemical Bonding Chemical Bonding
    Chemical Bonding • Petrucci, Harwood and Herring: Chapters 10 and 11 • Aims: – To look at bonding and possible shapes of molecules • We will mainly do this through Lewis structures – To look at ionic and covalent bonds – Use valence shell electronic structure to predict shapes of molecules CHEM 1000 3.0 Chemical Bonding I 1 Chemical Bonding • The most important concepts here are: – Electrons, particularly valence electrons play a fundamental role in chemical bonding. – When elements combine to produce compounds they are attempting to achieve a valence shell like a noble gas CHEM 1000 3.0 Chemical Bonding I 2 Chemical Bonding • The driving force for the production of chemical bonds is the need for an atom to complete a valence shell (usually 8 electrons) – Often electrons can be transferred from one atom to another to make ions. The atoms are then held together by coulombic forces in an ionic bond – More often the only way an atom can gain electrons is by sharing. This sharing produces a covalent bond CHEM 1000 3.0 Chemical Bonding I 3 •1 Lewis Symbols • This is a way of representing the valence electrons in an element – It does not include the inner shell electrons – It does not include the spin of an electron – e.g. Si ([Ne]3s 23p 2) Si – N ([He]2s 22p 3) N CHEM 1000 3.0 Chemical Bonding I 4 Lewis Structures • These are the combination of Lewis symbols that represents the sharing or transfer of electrons in a molecule – Examples – Ionic bond Na x + Cl [Na] + [ x Cl ] - – Covalent bond Hx + Cl H x Cl CHEM 1000 3.0 Chemical Bonding I 5 Ionic Compounds • We don’t usually see isolated ionic compounds – Normally they are in crystals where one anion (negative) is attached to several cations (positive) and vice versa.
    [Show full text]
  • Conjugated Molecules
    Conjugated Molecules - Conjugated molecules have alternating single and multiple (i.e. double or triple) bonds. Example 1: Nomenclature: 2,6-dimethylhepta-2,5-diene This molecule is not conjugated because it does not have alternating single and multiple bonds (the arrangement of the bonds starting from C2 is double, single, single and double). Between the two double bonds, there is a saturated center (C4) and two intersecting single bonds. Example 2: Nomenclature: 2,5-dimethylhexa-2,4-diene This molecule is conjugated because the arrangement of the bonds starting at C2 is double, single, and double. They are alternated. Example 3: Nomenclature: (2E)-hept-2-en-5-yne note: (2E) is a stereochemical identifier. The letter “E” indicates the arrangement of the double bond (where E usually refers to trans and Z refers to cis). The number “2” indicates the position of the double bond. This molecule is not conjugated because the single and multiple bonds are not alternated. Example 4: Nomenclature: (2Z)-hex-2-en-4-yne This molecule is conjugated because there is an alternation of multiple and single bonds (double, single, and triple starting from C2). More examples: note: the term conjugation refers to parts of the molecule. If you can find one conjugated system within the molecule, that molecule is said to be conjugated. Example: In this molecule, the double bond A is not conjugated. However, since double bond B is conjugated with double bond C, the molecule is said to be conjugated. Special Nomenclature: The Letter "S" stands for “single” and indicates that we are talking about the conjugated double bonds.
    [Show full text]
  • II. Nomenclature Rules for Alkenes 1. the Parent Name Will Be the Longest
    1 Lecture 9 II. Nomenclature Rules For Alkenes 1. The parent name will be the longest carbon chain that contains both carbons of the double bond. Drop the -ane suffix of the alkane name and add the –ene suffix. Never name the double bond as a prefix. If a double bond is present, you have an alkene, not an alkane. alkane + -ene = alkene 2. Begin numbering the chain at the end nearest the double bond. Always number through the double bond and identify its position in the longest chain with the lower number. In the older IUPAC rules the number for the double bond was placed in front of the stem name with a hyphen. Under the newer rules, the number for the double bond is placed right in front of “ene”, with hyphens. We will use the newer rules for specifying the location of pi bonds. 1 2 3456 H3CCHCH CH 2 CH2 CH3 hex-2-ene (newer rules) 2-hexene (older rules) 3. Indicate the position of any substituent group by the number of the carbon atom in the parent (longest) chain to which it is attached. CH 1 2 345 3 H3CCHCHCHCH2 CH CH3 6 7 CH3 Numbering is determined by the double bond, not the branches, because the double bond has 5,6-dimethylhept-3-ene (newer rules) higher priority than any alkyl branch. 5,6-dimethyl-3-heptene (older rules) 4. Number cycloalkenes so that the double bond is 1,2 (number through the double bond). Number in the direction about the ring so that the lowest number is used at the first point of difference.
    [Show full text]
  • Are Carbonahalogen Double and Triple Bonds Possible? Robert Kalescky, Elfi Kraka, and Dieter Cremer*
    FULL PAPER WWW.Q-CHEM.ORG Are CarbonAHalogen Double and Triple Bonds Possible? Robert Kalescky, Elfi Kraka, and Dieter Cremer* The carbonAhalogen and carbonAchalcogen bonding of 84 responding F-derivatives. Diatomic CF1 and CCl1 possess fully molecules was investigated utilizing local vibrational modes developed double bonds but not, as suggested in the litera- calculated at the M06-2X/cc-pVTZ level of theory including ture, triple bonds. Halonium ions have fractional (electron-defi- anharmonicity corrections in all cases. The relative bond cient) CX bonds, which can be stabilized by r-donor strength order of each CX or CE bond (X 5 F, Cl; E 5 O, S) was substituents or by an increased polarizability of the halogen derived from the local CX or CE stretching force constant and atom as with Cl. Bridged halonium ions are more stable than compared with trends of calculated bond lengths r and bond their acyclic counterparts, which results from more effective dissociation energies (BDE) obtained at the G3 level of theory. two-electron-three-center bonding. VC 2014 Wiley Periodicals, It is shown that both bond length r and BDE are not reliable Inc. bond strength descriptors. The CX double bond is realized for some Cl-substituted carbenium ions, however, not for the cor- DOI: 10.1002/qua.24626 Introduction To determine bond strength, we use a dynamic property of the bond. By moving the atoms out of their equilibrium posi- Halogens such as fluorine or chlorine are known to establish tion, a restoring force proportional to the bond strength can [1] single bonds with C in line with their monovalent character.
    [Show full text]