DOCSLIB.ORG

Catalog-Superior-Components.Pdf

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Catalog-Superior-Components.Pdf Childhood is about more than having fun — it’s about exploring the world, challenging growing muscles, and using imagination in new ways. It’s proven that children need unstructured play to grow and develop into happy, healthy, well-adjusted people. That’s why at Superior Recreational Products, we help children grow by offering a full line of play components for both commercial and residential use. 04 Commercial Components WE HAVE AN ALL 48 Residential Components NEW WEBSITE! Check it out by 59 Complete Your Space scanning below. 64 Colors 65 Warranty or visit srpcomponents.com Component Materials COMMERCIAL At Superior, we only use quality playground materials — whether purchasing a climber or a full structure. Manufactured at our west Georgia manufacturing facility, most of our playground components are proudly made in the USA. Our components are built to last and RESIDENTIAL will provide fun for years to come. Our rotationally-molded plastics Our Superdurable powder COMPLETE have anti-static inhibitors. coat leaves your components protected. Our rotationally-molded plastics, such as those used for slides and tubes, is made of ⅜” thick After blasted ‘white’ to remove all surface rust low density polyethylene (LDPE). Not only are and oil, our steel is coated electrostatically A. UV Ray-Blocking Shade our rotationally-molded plastics UV stabilized with an epoxy TGIC powder coat zinc-rich Our shade fabric blocks 91% – 98% of harmful UV rays, for reduced fading, they also contain anti-static primer and then with Superdurable polyester depending on the color you have chosen to accompany COLORS inhibitors. Strong and durable, components TGIC powder coat. A total of 6 mils of finished your play structure. Some of our fabric choices are CFM certified. See page 164 for more information. made of this material are ready to withstand powder coat has been applied to your product, many long days at the playground. leaving your components protected. D. Punched Steel Decking SRP’s decks are formed from 12-gague hot-rolled steel body. The decks are then finished with a PVC textured coating for increased foot traction and support. Our textured high density Our steel decks and stairs are E. Rotationally-molded Plastics polyethylene is strong and among the thickest in the industry. UV stabilized. Plastics for our slides, tubes, climbers, and such are made of 3/8" thick low density polyethylene (LDPE). Our steel decks are formed from 12-gauge Superior’s plastics are also armed with anti-static Our strong, textured high density polyethylene hot-rolled steel body — among the thickest in inhibitors and UV stabilization to reduce fading. material is used for our activity panels and even the industry — and coated with UV stabilized some of our climbers! With UV stabilization, PVC (plastisol) coating for a softer play surface. F. Stainless Steel Hardware we ensure your carefully selected color will Additionally, they’re sprayed with X-Tuff, a PVC The hardware and fasteners we use on playgrounds are remain bright and colorful for years to come. textured coating that increases foot traction stainless steel; very limited exceptions apply. To allow Additionally, these panels are stain and graffiti and support. Our decks are perforated for great for efficient installation, all hardware is packaged and resistant and will not splinter or crack. drainage and are lead-free. 2 | 866.965.2781 srpplayground.comsrpcomponents.com | 3 Sectional Slide Product Number Reference Find slide product numbers fast with our quick reference guide. Chute Slides COMMERCIAL Deck Features Straight Left Right Snake Snake Curve Curve Wave Double Height Slide Hood Veer Veer Left Right Left Right Wave SGS-3STR 3’ CSS-3STR SGS-4STR 4’ CSS-4STR SGS-5STR SGS-5LV SGS-5RV SGS-5WAVE 5’ CSS-5STR CSS-5LV CSS-5RV CSS-5WAVE SGS-6STR SGS-6LV SGS-6RV SGS-6WAVE 6’ CSS-6STR CSS-6LV CSS-6RV CSS-6WAVE SGS-7STR SGS-7LV SGS-7RV SGS-7SNL SGS-7SNR SGS-7LT SGS-7RT SGS-7WAVE SGS-7WAVE2 7’ CSS-7STR CSS-7LV CSS-7RV CSS-7SNL CSS-7SNR CSS-7LT CSS-7RT CSS-7WAVE CSS-7WAVE2 SGS-8STR SGS-8LV SGS-8RV SGS-8SNL SGS-8SNR SGS-8LT SGS-8RT SGS-8WAVE SGS-8WAVE2 8’ Commercial CSS-8STR CSS-8LV CSS-8RV CSS-8SNL CSS-8SNR CSS-8LT CSS-8RT CSS-8WAVE CSS-8WAVE2 play components SGS vs CSS: WHAT'S THE DIFFERENCE? SGS model numbers feature our Star Gate Slide Hood while our CSS models do not. 05 Slides 08 Climbers 11 Overhead Ladders Tube Slides 13 Barriers and Panels Deck Straight 90° 90° Zig-Zag Zig-Zag Spiral Deck Spiral 16 Stairs and Bridges Height Left Right Left Right Height 24" Diameter 30608102CX 30608132CX 30608142CX 30608112CX 30608122CX 7’ 30" Diameter 6767-0 17 Tubes and Cubes 2’ 30" Diameter 50608102CX 30608132CX 30608142CX 8’ 30" Diameter 6768-0 19 Roofs 24" Diameter 30608103CX 30608133CX 30608143CX 30608113CX 30608123CX 9’ 30" Diameter 6769-0 3’ 20 Swings 30" Diameter 50608103CX 50608133CX 50608143CX 10’ 30" Diameter 6770-0 24" Diameter 30608104CX 30608134CX 30608144CX 30608114CX 30608124CX 11’ 30" Diameter 6771-0 Play Accessories 4’ 23 30" Diameter 50608104CX 50608134CX 50608144CX 50608114CX 50608124CX 12’ 30" Diameter 6772-0 Independent Play 24" Diameter 30608105CX 30608135CX 30608145CX 30608115CX 30608125CX 13’ 30" Diameter 6773-0 24 5’ 50608105CX 50608135CX 50608145CX 50608115CX 50608125CX 30 Hardware 30" Diameter 14’ 30" Diameter 6774-0 24" Diameter 30608106CX 30608136CX 30608146CX 30608116CX 30608126CX 30608156CX 15’ 30" Diameter 6775-0 Timbers 6’ 33 30" Diameter 50608106CX 50608136CX 50608146CX 50608116CX 50608126CX 16’ 30" Diameter 6776-0 24" Diameter 30608107CX 30608137CX 30608147CX 30608117CX 30608127CX 30608157CX 34 Playground Signs 7’ 30" Diameter 50608107CX 50608137CX 50608147CX 50608117CX 50608127CX Surfacing 35 24" Diameter 30608108CX 30608138CX 30608148CX 30608118CX 30608128CX 30608158CX 8’ 36 Play Structures 30" Diameter 50608108CX 50608138CX 50608148CX 50608118CX 50608128CX *SGS models are ASTM compliant. MORE SLIDE INFORMATION ON PAGES 6–7 4 | 866.965.2781 srpcomponents.com | 5 Slides Slides All of our commercial slides are All of our commercial slides are COMMERCIAL made from roto-molded plastic. made from roto-molded plastic. A. 90° Turn Slide A. Spiral Tube Slide A B 3’: Model 07649 B Model 6771-0 4’: Model 07654 11’ deck height, 30” diameter For all deck heights, please refer B. Single Bedway Slide to the table on page 5. 2’: Model 07310 2DWFS* 3’: Model 00134 3DWFS B. Right Veer Sectional Slide 4’: Model 00135 4DWFS Model CSS-5RV 5’: Model 00136 5DWFS *Does not feature molded foot and requires wide slide foot Also Available Veer Slide with Slide Hood C. Wave Slide Left Veer: Model SGS-6LV 4’: Model 07200 4DWWS Right Veer: Model SGS-5RV 5’: Model 07651 5DWWS 6’: Model 07420 6DWWS* C. NEW! 6–23 Month Double D A C Bedway Slide Model RMP-0020 *6’ Wave Slide for a 72” deck requires a mid-slide support Standard slide feet (30108511XX) D. Single Slide Hood D. Triple Rail Slide 36": Model 07666 3’: Model 07655 40": Model 07647 4’: Model 07665 Available for Single Bedway, Wave, 5’: Model 07669* and 90° slides *Requires two standard slide feet E. Wide Slide Hood E. Cobra Coil Slide Wide: Model 07648 Features slide hood Available for Wide, Double Bedway, Includes shipping base and Triple Rail Slides C E Slide: Model 08700 D E Slide Transition: Model 08701 Limited transition colors available F. Alpine Thunder Slide Need slide hardware Model 00152 or accessories? 62” wide, 6’ tall Requires two slide feet Head on over to page 32 for slide brackets, slide foots, and more! G. Wide Chute Slide Model 00139 36” wide and 3’ tall F G Wide slide feet *For plastic slide only unless noted. *For plastic slide only unless noted. 6 | 866.965.2781 srpcomponents.com | 7 G Climbers Climbers COMMERCIAL A. Tree Climber A. Vertical Ladder Model 70007012 Steel construction Available for 24”–72” decks Superdurable powder coat finish Steel construction 24” Deck: Model 70014024 B Superdurable powder coat finish A B 36” Deck: Model 70014036 48” Deck: Model 70014048 B. Coil Climber 60” Deck: Model 70014060 Model 70007006 72” Deck: Model 70014072 Available for 24”–72” decks Steel construction B. Bubble Wall Climber Superdurable powder coat finish Brackets available for 6”x 6” posts Made from roto-molded plastic C. Education Climber Model 50607017 Large: Model 07667 (pictured) Available for 48” or 60” decks Attachment brackets (0767900) Made from roto-molded plastic Small: Model 07668 Features numbers Attachment brackets (0767800) A C D. Zipper Climber D C. Chain Link Climber Model TCW07065 Model 07520 Available for 72” decks Available for 48” or 60” decks Steel construction Made from roto-molded plastic Superdurable powder coat finish D. Vertical Panel Climber E. Clover Climber Made from HDPE panel Model 70007005 Available for 24”–72” decks 24” Deck: Model TCW04349 Steel construction 36” Deck: Model TCW04380 Superdurable powder coat finish 48” Deck: Model TCW04381 F. Tire Climber E. Bedrock Climber Model TWC07066 Model 07535 D Available for 60” decks C E Available for 36”–48” decks Features roto-molded plastic tires Made from roto-molded plastic Mounts with wide slide foot G. Climbing Rock Holds (top right of page) F. Sliding Pole Model CRH Model 70007010 Sold in sets of 4 Available for 24”–72” decks Steel construction Superdurable powder coat finish G. Half Moon Climber Model TCW06090 Available for 48”–72” decks Steel construction E F F G Superdurable powder coat finish *Posts and decks not included. *Posts and decks not included. 8 | 866.965.2781 srpcomponents.com | 9 G Climbers Overhead Ladder Overhead Ladders Configurations COMMERCIAL A. Ring Climber A. Trapeze Ring Overhead Ladder Model TCW06091 Polished aluminum handles Available for 36” deck height only Our overhead ladders, which help Features hangers and single chain link Steel construction to build upper body strength and welded to frame with clevis fasteners A B Superdurable powder coat finish improve hand-eye coordination, A are available in four different Straight: Model 70009009 Wavy: Model 70009309 B.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Jones, Peter ORCID: 0000000295669393 and Comfort, Daphne (2019) Elm Trees Under Attack Again. Town And
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by University of Gloucestershire Research Repository This is a peer-reviewed, final published version of the following document and is licensed under All Rights Reserved license: Jones, Peter ORCID: 0000-0002-9566-9393 and Comfort, Daphne (2019) Elm trees under attack again. Town and Country Planning. pp. 71-74. ISSN 0040-9960 Official URL: https://www.tcpa.org.uk/ EPrint URI: http://eprints.glos.ac.uk/id/eprint/6552 Disclaimer The University of Gloucestershire has obtained warranties from all depositors as to their title in the material deposited and as to their right to deposit such material. The University of Gloucestershire makes no representation or warranties of commercial utility, title, or fitness for a particular purpose or any other warranty, express or implied in respect of any material deposited. The University of Gloucestershire makes no representation that the use of the materials will not infringe any patent, copyright, trademark or other property or proprietary rights. The University of Gloucestershire accepts no liability for any infringement of intellectual property rights in any material deposited but will remove such material from public view pending investigation in the event of an allegation of any such infringement. PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR TEXT. elm trees under attack again Peter Jones and Daphne Comfort outline the potential environmental impact of a new threat to elms in Britain, and look at current control treatments English elms in Cuckmere Valley in East Sussex The ConservationThe Foundation From the late 1960s onwards, Dutch elm disease there is no evidence from Europe to date of even spread rapidly within southern Britain,1 devastating severely defoliated elms dying.
    [Show full text]
  • Cultural Resource Survey Report
    BRIGHTON SUBDIVISION HISTORIC PROPERTIES SURVEY PHASE I CLG Grant CO-17-013 Cultural Resource Survey Report Prepared by Autobee & Autobee, LLC 6900 W. 26th Avenue Lakewood, CO 80214 June 18, 2018 Acknowledgements The activity that is the subject of this material has been financed in part with Federal funds from the National Historic Preservation Act, administered by the National Park Service, U.S. Department of the Interior for History Colorado. However, the contents and opinions do not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the U.S. Department of the Interior or History Colorado, nor does the mention of trade names or commercial products constitute an endorsement or recommendation by the Department of the Interior or History Colorado. This program received Federal funds from the National Park Service. Regulations of the U.S. Department of the Interior strictly prohibit unlawful discrimination in departmental Federally-assisted programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, age or handicap. Any person who believes he or she has been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility operated by a recipient of Federal assistance should write to: Director, Equal Opportunity Program, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240. Brighton Subdivision Historic Properties Survey-Phase I 2 Table of Contents Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eveleigh Carriagevorks
    EVELEIGH CARRIAGEWORKS CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT PLAN VOLUME I OTTO CSERHALMI + PARTNERS PL 2002 Table of Contents i 2002 TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ------------------------------------------------------------------- 1 SECTION 2.0 INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5 2.1 Aims of the Report ------------------------------------------------------------------- 7 2.2 Site and Ownership ------------------------------------------------------------------ 8 2.3 Scope of the Report ----------------------------------------------------------------- 10 2.4 Methodology and Structure -------------------------------------------------------- 10 2.5 Terminology and Abbreviations --------------------------------------------------- 11 2.6 Contributors and Acknowledgements -------------------------------------------- 17 2.7 Constraints and Limitations -------------------------------------------------------- 18 2.8 Further Research --------------------------------------------------------------------- 18 2.9 Other Reports ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 19 SECTION 3.0 HISTORICAL ANALYSIS ------------------------------------------------------------------ 21 3.1 History and Development of the Site --------------------------------------------- 23 3.1.1 Geology & Geography ------------------------------------------------------ 23 3.1.2 Aboriginal History ----------------------------------------------------------- 24 3.1.3 Early Development ----------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Railways As World Heritage Sites
    Occasional Papers for the World Heritage Convention RAILWAYS AS WORLD HERITAGE SITES Anthony Coulls with contributions by Colin Divall and Robert Lee International Council on Monuments and Sites (ICOMOS) 1999 Notes • Anthony Coulls was employed at the Institute of Railway Studies, National Railway Museum, York YO26 4XJ, UK, to prepare this study. • ICOMOS is deeply grateful to the Government of Austria for the generous grant that made this study possible. Published by: ICOMOS (International Council on Monuments and Sites) 49-51 Rue de la Fédération F-75015 Paris France Telephone + 33 1 45 67 67 70 Fax + 33 1 45 66 06 22 e-mail [email protected] © ICOMOS 1999 Contents Railways – an historical introduction 1 Railways as World Heritage sites – some theoretical and practical considerations 5 The proposed criteria for internationally significant railways 8 The criteria in practice – some railways of note 12 Case 1: The Moscow Underground 12 Case 2: The Semmering Pass, Austria 13 Case 3: The Baltimore & Ohio Railroad, United States of America 14 Case 4: The Great Zig Zag, Australia 15 Case 5: The Darjeeling Himalayan Railway, India 17 Case 6: The Liverpool & Manchester Railway, United Kingdom 19 Case 7: The Great Western Railway, United Kingdom 22 Case 8: The Shinkansen, Japan 23 Conclusion 24 Acknowledgements 25 Select bibliography 26 Appendix – Members of the Advisory Committee and Correspondents 29 Railways – an historical introduction he possibility of designating industrial places as World Heritage Sites has always been Timplicit in the World Heritage Convention but it is only recently that systematic attention has been given to the task of identifying worthy locations.
    [Show full text]
  • Toolkit for Creating Inclusive, Learning-Friendly Environments; 2014
    Published in 2015 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France and UNESCO Bangkok Office © UNESCO 2015 1st print: 2004 2nd print: 2005 3rd print: 2015 (Electronic version only) ISBN 92-9223-032-8 (Electronic version) This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/). By using the content of this publication, the users accept to be bound by the terms of use of the UNESCO Open Access Repository (http://www. unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-en). The designations employed and the presentation of material throughout this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of UNESCO concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. The ideas and opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors; they are not necessarily those of UNESCO and do not commit the Organization. TH/APL/15/012 Toolkit for Creating Inclusive, Learning-Friendly Environments 1 Foreword The education of children with diverse backgrounds and abilities remains a major challenge in the Asia-Pacific region. In April 2000, the World Education Forum held in Dakar, Senegal, set as its second goal: “ensuring that by 2015 all children, particularly girls, children in difficult circumstances and those belonging to ethnic minorities, have access to and complete free and compulsory primary education of good quality.” Realizing this goal means increasing school attendance and completion rates; eliminating bias within schools, national education systems, and curricula; and eliminating the social and cultural discrimination that limits the demand for schooling for children with diverse backgrounds and abilities.
    [Show full text]
  • General Guidelines for the Design of Light Rail Transit Facilities in Edmonton
    General Guidelines for the Design of Light Rail Transit Facilities in Edmonton Robert R. Clark Retired ETS Supervisor of Special Projects 1984 2 General Guidelines for the Design of Light Rail Transit Facilities in Edmonton This report originally published in 1984 Author: Robert R. Clark, Retired ETS Supervisor of Special Projects Reformatting of this work completed in 2009 OCR and some images reproduced by Ashton Wong Scans completed by G. W. Wong In memory of my mentors: D.L.Macdonald, L.A.(Llew)Lawrence, R.A.(Herb)Mattews, Dudley B. Menzies, and Gerry Wright who made Edmonton Transit a leader in L.R.T. Table of Contents 3 Table of Contents 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................................ 6 2.0 The Role Of Light Rail Transit In Edmonton's Transportation System ................................................. 6 2.1 Definition and Description of L.R.T. .................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Integrating L.R.T. into the Transportation System .............................................................................. 7 2.3 Segregation of Guideway .................................................................................................................... 9 2.4 Intrusion and Accessibility ................................................................................................................ 10 2.5 Segregation from Users (Safety) ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Poland – Slovakia – Lithuania ***
    FMC Travel Club A subsidiary of Federated Mountain Clubs of New Zealand (Inc.) www.fmc.org.nz Club Convenor : John Dobbs Travel Smart Napier Civic Court, Dickens Street, Napier 4110 P : 06 8352222 DD : 06 8340669 E : [email protected] *** Poland – Slovakia – Lithuania *** A unique month in Northern Europe The High Tatras, Medieval towns, Nazi camps amid stunning autumn scenery 15th September to 15th October 2020, 31 days $5995 from Krakow to Warsaw** Trip leaders : Joe and Vicky Nawalaniec Price estimated as at November 2019, so subject to currency fluctuations and unforeseen costs, etc **Price is based on twin sharing, so a solo room supplement would apply (tba) **Any payment by visa or mastercard adds $150 to the final price Viability is subject to a minimum of 8 and maximum of 12 participants PRICE INCLUDES • All accommodation – 30 nights in comfortable hotels on twin shared basis (solo room would attract a supplement) • All transport – our own hired vehicle(s) are determined on final numbers • All breakfasts and 17 dinners (dinners are subject to a final location schedule) • An experienced and knowledgeable Kiwi trip leader and his wife in a supporting role • A unique and comprehensive tour through a stunning part of Europe, payment to FMC PRICE DOES NOT INCLUDE • Travel to Krakow and from Warsaw • Lunches and dinners not otherwise included • Entrance fees to sights, personal incidental expenses or activities outside the itinerary • Travel insurance For many Kiwi trampers, central-east European hiking is off the radar. Throw in some gorgeous old towns, stunning autumnal colours, a bit of stark, sobering WW11 history, some hearty food and drink, and we have the makings of a rather special trip.
    [Show full text]
  • Running Day Reports Looks Very Nice Indeed
    Volume 35. No. 1. February 2007 Brian Carter with Perserverence on the elevated track, passes John Tulloch working the J hard uphill on the outer main. Running Day Reports looks very nice indeed. Simon had some water cut frames for a Springbok, which he obtained at a good price and November 2007 Running Day Report. are excellent quality too! Absolutely beautiful weather today for the last spring- Brian Muston has supplied some more new flags for the time running day for 2006. It brought out the crowds for trains, which now makes a full set. our charity day for RedKite. There were small but con- stant queues at the gate which was manned (or is it First out was Brian Kilgour, 2-8-0 Nigel Gresley success- girled?) by our RedKite volunteers. There were a number fully trying out his new char grate on the elevated (read of parties and everyone seemed to have a good time. We more about this type of grate in the Feature articles). totalled 2361 rides which gave the group a reasonable Brian hauled two cars. result for the day, the best result we have had for them for some years. Next out running was Warwick’s V1224 onto the inner main. It was manned by David Thomas & Steve Border Mark Gibbons attended initially to a few points prob- for most of the latter part of the afternoon, and was the lems, which then ran OK the rest of the afternoon. Matt only train to run on the inner. Lee had his original P class tender (for his 25class) and it Sydney Live Steam Locomotive Society Newsletter Page 1 February 2007 December 2007 Running Day Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Safety Investigation Report
    RAIL SAFETY INVESTIGATION REPORT COLLISION BETWEEN HI-RAIL AND RAIL MOTOR ZIG ZAG RAILWAY CLARENCE 1 APRIL 2011 RAIL SAFETY INVESTIGATION REPORT COLLISION BETWEEN HI-RAIL AND RAIL MOTOR ZIG ZAG RAILWAY CLARENCE 1 APRIL 2011 Released under the provisions of Section 45C (2) of the Transport Administration Act 1988 and Section 67 (2) of the Rail Safety Act 2008 Investigation Reference 04511 Published by: The Office of Transport Safety Investigations Postal address: PO Box A2616, Sydney South, NSW 1235 Office location: Level 17, 201 Elizabeth St, Sydney NSW 2000 Telephone: 02 9322 9200 Accident and Incident notification: 1800 677 766 Facsimile: 02 9322 9299 E-mail: [email protected] Internet: www.otsi.nsw.gov.au This Report is Copyright©. In the interests of enhancing the value of the information contained in this Report, its contents may be copied, downloaded, displayed, printed, reproduced and distributed, but only in unaltered form (and retaining this notice). However, copyright in material contained in this Report which has been obtained by the Office of Transport Safety Investigations from other agencies, private individuals or organisations, belongs to those agencies, individuals or organisations. Where use of their material is sought, a direct approach will need to be made to the owning agencies, individuals or organisations. Subject to the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968, no other use may be made of the material in this Report unless permission of the Office of Transport Safety Investigations has been obtained. THE OFFICE OF TRANSPORT SAFETY INVESTIGATIONS The Office of Transport Safety Investigations (OTSI) is an independent NSW agency whose purpose is to improve transport safety through the investigation of accidents and incidents in the rail, bus and ferry industries.
    [Show full text]
  • 42 Papers Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention In
    42 World Heritage papers42 World Heritage papers HEADWORLD HERITAGES 5 NIO M O UN IM D R T IA A L • P • W L O A I R D L D N H O E M R I E TA IN G O E • PATRIM United Nations World Educational, Scientific and Heritage Cultural Organization Convention Human Origin Sites and the GOBIERNO DE World Heritage Convention in the Americas PUEBLAACCIONES QUE TRANSFORMAN In support of UNESCO’s 70th Anniversary Celebrations United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization VOLUME I Human Origin Sites and the Heritage World in the Convention Americas. I Volume For more information contact: UNESCO World Heritage Centre papers NIO M O UN IM D R T IA A L • P • W L O A I 7, place Fontenoy R D L D N H O E M 75352 Paris 07 SP France R E I TA IN G O Tel: 33 (0)1 45 68 24 96 E • PATRIM Fax: 33 (0)1 45 68 55 70 United Nations World Educational, Scientific and Heritage 9 789231 001406 http://whc.unesco.org HeritageWorld Cultural Organization Convention Human Origin Sites and the World Heritage Convention in the Americas HEADS 5 VOLUME I Published in 2015 by the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 7, place de Fontenoy, 75352 Paris 07 SP, France and the UNESCO Office in Mexico, Presidente Masaryk 526, Polanco, Miguel Hidalgo, 11550 Ciudad de Mexico, D.F., Mexico. © UNESCO 2015 ISBN 978-92-3-100140-6 This publication is available in Open Access under the Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 IGO (CC-BY-SA 3.0 IGO) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/igo/).
    [Show full text]
  • Rail Passenger Equipment Accidents and the Evaluation of Crashworthiness Strategies
    Rail Passenger Equipment Accidents and the Evaluation of Crashworthiness Strategies David C. Tyrell Volpe National Transportation Systems Center U.S. Department of Transportation 1 ABSTRACT The U.S. Department of Transportation’s Federal Railroad Administration’s (FRA) Office of Research and Development has been conducting research into rail equipment crashworthiness. The approach taken in conducting this research has been to review relevant accidents, identify options for design modifications to improve occupant survivability, and to apply analytic tools and testing techniques for evaluating the effectiveness of these strategies. Accidents have been grouped into three categories: train-to-train collisions, collisions with objects, such as grade crossing collisions, and derailments and other single train events. In order to determine the potential effectiveness of improved crashworthiness equipment, computer models have been used to simulate the behavior of conventional and modified equipment in scenarios based on accidents. 2 INTRODUCTION Train accidents can be tragic events, with loss of life and serious injuries. The crashworthiness features of the train are intended to minimize fatalities and injuries if an accident does occur. The purpose of such features is to preserve sufficient space for the occupants to ride out the collision, and to maintain the forces and decelerations imparted to the occupants within survivable levels. Structural features of the cars, such as longitudinal strength of the carbody and crush zones at the ends of cars, influence how well the cars preserve the occupant volume during a collision and the decelerations imparted to the occupants. Occupant protection features inside the car, such as compartmentalization, influence the forces imparted to the occupants.
    [Show full text]
  • ESC 215 Transit Space, Version 4.9
    Technical Note – TN 005: 2019 For queries regarding this document [email protected] www.transport.nsw.gov.au Technical Note – TN 005: 2019 Issue date: 20 November 2019 Effective date: 20 November 2019 Subject: Updates to ESC 215 Transit Space, version 4.9 This technical note is issued by the Asset Standards Authority (ASA) to notify amendments to ESC 215 Transit Space, version 4.9. It replaces the following technical notes: • TN 026: 2018 Update to ESC 215 Transit Space, version 4.9 to introduce Sub-Medium rolling stock • TN 089: 2015 Update to Medium Electric rolling stock outline diagram in T HR RS 00100 ST (RSU 110) and ESC 215 In addition, this technical note includes amendments to the requirements of Extended Medium, Wide Electric, Out of Gauge Load, NZZA Wagon and ANZR outlines. TN 026: 2018 and TN 089: 2015 will be withdrawn with the publication of TN 005: 2019. 1. Introduction of Sub-Medium rolling stock A new rolling stock outline, to be known as Sub-Medium, will be introduced to the electrified portion of the TfNSW Metropolitan Heavy Rail Network. The Sub-Medium will comply with the Medium Electric rolling stock outline, but have what is termed a two-stage kinematic response. Operating on normal track conditions, Sub-Medium vehicles will be specified to comply with the general kinematic tolerances in Section 10.2 of ESC 215. Under certain prescribed track conditions and speed, these vehicles will be specified to generate a reduced kinematic response. Prior to the deployment of Sub-Medium rolling stock on certain sections of the network, the track width classification of those sections will be altered from Narrow to Sub-Medium or from Narrow to Medium.
    [Show full text]