Art and Politics: a Small History of Art for Social Change Since 1945 Free
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
FREE ART AND POLITICS: A SMALL HISTORY OF ART FOR SOCIAL CHANGE SINCE 1945 PDF Claudia Mesch | 224 pages | 15 Oct 2013 | I.B.Tauris & Co Ltd | 9781848851108 | English | London, United Kingdom 15 Influential Political Art Pieces | Widewalls What is political art? Is it different than the art itself and could it be the art beside the politics, as we know the political truth is the ruling mechanism over all aspects of humanity? From its beginnings, art is inseparable from the societies and throughout its history authors always reflected the present moment bringing the artistic truth to the general public. For Plato and Aristotle, mimesis - the act of artistic creation is inseparable from the notion of real world, in which art represents or rather disputes the various models of beauty, truth, and the good within the societal reality. Hence, position of the art sphere is semi- autonomous, as it is independent field of creation freed from the rules, function and norms, but on the other hand, art world is deeply connected and dependent from artistic productionways of curating and display as well as socio-economical conditions and political context. In times of big political changes, many art and cultural workers choose to reflect the context within their artistic practices and consequently to create politically and socially engaged art. Art could be connected to politics in many different ways, and the field of politically engaged art is rather broad and rich than a homogenous term reducible to political propaganda. There are many strategies to reach the state of political engagement in art and it includes the wide scale of artistic interventions from bare gestures to complex conceptual pieces with direct political engagement intended to factual political changes. But when disputing politically engaged art, we must not forget that art is not and could not be the mere means of political action nor reduced to this specific function ; although it could be an active part of activist practice. In the 20th century, the aestheticization of the politics was heavily criticized as a try to conceive regular practices of life and societal behavior as innately artistic, and to introduce politic values to art, by structuring it as an art form in order to normalize emancipatory or revolutionary practices and enclose it to the autonomous field of art. This was the concept first coined by Walter Benjamin and later developed in the thought of Frankfurt School. It was also the philosophical reaction to the appropriation of the art by the Fascist regimes in Europe. In the light of this theory, the polar opposite of these practices of aestheticization would be the term of the politicization of aesthetics — a kind of revolutionary praxis of rethinking the depoliticized field of art production and adding Art and Politics: A Small History of Art for Social Change Since 1945 wider political or rather an emancipatory character to the art work. The main idea behind the liberating art from the corrupting politic movements such as Fascism, Nazism or any other reductive and destructive social agenda, is to reclaim its autonomy once again. For any artistic work is crucial to be free from the function and especially transgressing its subordinate position when art is reduced to the political tool of ruling mechanism. The very act of negation or disagreement with the negative or harmful within the politics is crucial for understanding the core value of political artists and the politically engaged art in whole. As artistic practice is the act of creation, intervention into the body of real world, art, as a form of social action, is a very mighty tool of the political imaginationby re presenting the world, not in a sudden, but in some further or better condition. When questioning the role of art today, we must be aware of the illusive borders between art and lifeart and media, art Art and Politics: A Small History of Art for Social Change Since 1945 society, as well as art and activism. In so many cases of artist works, it is hard to formulate not just the notion of art but even its position within the society. The role of political art has always been crucial since it is one of rare uncorrupted forces of emancipatory action and battlefield of the crucial dispute what is and what could be beauty, truth, and the good. In the course of art history there are Art and Politics: A Small History of Art for Social Change Since 1945 examples art was the crucial reflection of political context. Moreover, analyzing and disputing the art pieces, we learn about life and circumstances from which we are far away in space or time. The art pieces were critical or undue to the dominant values of its time, we often understood as a political avant-garde, the announcement of the political changes that followed. Here, we would like to present different politically engaged art works, trying to display the wide specter of political action within the field of art, without pitfall of losing the art qualities and becoming the political agenda itself. The selection we made addresses the questions of wars and political conflictsrise of fascismrevolution and social changeas well as human rights activismfeminismautonomy of art or various problems of artistic production and work itself. Methodologies, media or artistic strategies are numerous in political art and proving that politically committed artworks and the work of political artists in general is not reducible to propaganda. Tatlin's Constructivist tower was planned to be the moving sculpture of the Revolution, the dynamic metaphor of uprising the modernity, revolutionary thinking and the new world order. Besides its monumental and poetic value, the structure should have architectural functions and could have been used for conferences and different governmental functions. Due to economic crash in post-revolutionary Russia, the Monument to the Third International has been never built but its smaller size models are situated in Stockholm, Moscow and Paris. The process of painting and the life of the fresco painting itself raised a big controversy since Rivera included images of V. Lenin and motifs of a Soviet Russian May Day parade on it. Despite protests from artists, Nelson Rockefeller ordered the destruction of this political artwork before it was completed. There are only a few black and white photos of the finished paintings, photographed by the artist himself. Europe After the Rain is surrealistic landscape of dystopian Europe after the enormous destruction in Second World War, painted by Max Ernst who was personally affected by the Nazi politics in Germany. The paysage is dominated by pessimist feelings of emotional desolation, physical exhaustion and deep fears, which are rather archetypal concern over the humanity than just actual reflection on war horror. Concentration camps are always considered as the epitome of the war horror. Jewish artist Peter Kien was imprisoned in Terezin, where he used stolen artistic materials to witness the living conditions in the Terezin ghetto. A true example of political art, his artworks transgress the field of art, being one of the most important documents recalling the truth on a concentration camp and the inhuman conditions of inmates. Inthe same year he painted the Watercolor of TerezinKien was deported in Auschwitz, where being brutally killed at the age of twenty-five. The artworks posses strong reflection of one of the first paintings of the new age - Francisco Goya 's masterpiece The Third of May from which it derives the political statement comparing the American forces in North Korea Art and Politics: A Small History of Art for Social Change Since 1945 the imperialistic Napoleon army, Tyrant of Europe. The artist openly depicted civilians killed by anti-communist forces as heroes standing erect and mocked the misshaped firing squad. The painting reflects the real fact that the African-American girl was escorted on her way to elementary school by four US marshals, walking in front of the protesters in at New Orleans. Racist graffiti, limited freedom of movement, racial segregation at schools were the reality of the American south in s so the artist raise a voice against it and made this important and influential political artwork. This political art piece strongly recall popular song by Tina Turner, also featured in blockbuster movie Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome. Do women need to be naked to get into the Met. Museum get a big echo in the world of art, since it make people rethink the consequences of exclusively male gaze on women body in the dominant art canon. Featured image: Guerilla Girls - Do women have to be naked to get into the Met. It is interesting that the graffiti was created by Dmitri Vrubel in s after the Berlin wall was down and it reflecting the continuation of the politics from the cold war era in the time of changes. Flower Thrower is one of the most iconic images of the famous street artist Banksy. The stencil art piece depicts the man, bombing the establishment with flowers. The image is reminiscent of images from the s campus and street riots and it is connected to the Jerusalem gay parade incidents. Intwo street artists JR and Marco organized the largest illegal photography exhibition ever under the project Face 2 Face. At the streets in several Palestinian and Israeli cities, the artists placed the portraits of Israelis and Palestinians as face to face, in large formats. In conflicted zones, this project brings unavoidable identification and humor while looking at series of laughing people separated only by their national and religious affiliation, but united in humanity. Shepard Fairey is an American contemporary street artistgraphic designer, activist, illustrator who inscribed the political statement of the expected progress and hope in United States inwithin this effective propaganda poster.