DOCSLIB.ORG

3Rd George Doriot Conference HEC Paris – EM Normandie & ADVANCIA

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
3Rd George Doriot Conference HEC Paris – EM Normandie & ADVANCIA 2009-06-29 3rd George Doriot Conference HEC Paris – EM Normandie & ADVANCIA 4th and 5 th March 2010 Normandy (venue to be decided) Intrapreneurship: The reality behind the talk Call for papers At Harvard Georges Doriot was a pioneer in management teaching and research. At the beginning of the 1930s he introduced into France the CPA case study method, which became the Executive MBA of the Groupe HEC. He was also one of the “inventors” of risk capital in the USA after the war and made his fortune by participating in the creation of DEC. Reasons for organizing the Georges Doriot Conference: Every two years the Georges Doriot Conference – created by HEC Paris and EM-Normandie and now joined by Advancia – provides the opportunity to put into practice three strong principles: - practical intelligence : entrepreneurship is a field where the link between practice and academic reflection is necessary and fruitful; - a cross-disciplinary vocation : this conference will make it possible to examine different facets of entrepreneurial phenomena: managerial, legal, psychological, historical, etc… In addition to management science, the conference will be open to specialists of economic science, legal science, cognitive science and, more widely, the human and social sciences. - open to the professional world : this conference is intended to be a place of exchange between the academic community and the professional world, just like Georges Doriot, who was both a pioneer in research and teaching and a major figure in the area of risk capital and entrepreneurship. Intrapreneurship: theme of the 3rd edition What if, backed up by some success stories, academic research on intrapreneurship slightly preceded management practice? First of all, it is difficult to measure the real importance of the phenomenon because its definition is not self-evident. In practice, intrapreneurship disdains traditional disciplines, being at the crossroads of innovation, human resources, projects, creativity and strategy. It goes beyond the initial area of large companies and invades the world of SMEs as well as the non-commercial domain and public management. Putting utopianism to one side, one must question the reality and limits of intrapreneurship. What is the real role or intrapreneurship in the diffusion of innovative management practices? Can the promotion of intrapreneurial behaviour paradoxically be accompanied by a desire to inhibit all vague entrepreneurial impulses. Is management by intrapreneurship a paradox in itself? With this in mind, we invite you to develop new original and critical perspectives on the following topics: - The various forms of intrapreneurship, - Intrapreneurship and innovation management, - Project management and intrapreneurship: differences and similarities, - Intrapreneurship and the making of strategy (autonomous strategic behaviour and emerging strategy), - Entrepreneurial organisation and intrapreneurial behaviour, - Managing intrapreneurs, - Intrapreneurship and power in organisations, - From intrapreneurship to entrpreneurship: levers and constraints, - Intrapreneurship versus entrepreneurship, - Intrapreneurship in the non-commercial world, - Management practices facilitating the development of intrapreneurial behaviour, - Gender, diversity and intrapreneurship, - Intrapreneurship and sustainable development, - etc. Among the speakers invited: Véronique BOUCHARD , Professor, EM Lyon Christophe MIDLER , Director of Research, CRG, Ecole Polytechnique Designed to be both academic and practical, this 3rd edition will feature a case study workshop . The best case will be selected by a special committee and published in the Expansion Entrepreneuriat review . 2 www.journeesgeorgesdoriot.org PERMANENT SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Eugènia Bieto Caubet, ESADE, Spain Alain Bloch, CNAM Paris, HEC Paris, France Maria Bonnafous Boucher, Advancia, France Louise Cadieux, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Canada Didier Chabaud, Université de Cergy, EM Normandie, France Alain Fayolle, E.M. Lyon, France Olivier Germain, EM Normandie, France Ari Ginsberg, New-York University, USA Tim Habberson, Babson College, USA Howard Stevenson, Harvard Business School, USA Thomas Zellweger, Universität St Gallen, Switzerland 3RD GEORGES DORIOT CONFERENCE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE Presided by Professors Véronique BOUCHARD (EM Lyon) and Camille CARRIER (Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières) Jacques Baronet (Université de Sherbrooke) Olivier Basso (Institut Singelton) Christel Beaucourt (Université de Lille 1) Lucie Bégin (EM Normandie) Michel Bernasconi (CERAM) Jean-Pierre Boissin (Université Pierre Mendès-France) Pascale Bueno Merino (ESSCA Angers) Sandra Charreire Petit (Université Paris Sud) Florence Charue Duboc (CRG, Ecole Polytechnique) Roland Condor (EM Normandie) Annie Cornet (HEC Liège) Bérangère Deschamps (Université Pierre Mendès-France) Louis-Jacques Fillion (HEC Montréal) Emmanuel Josserand (HEC Genève) Sihem Jouini (HEC Paris) Gérard Koenig (Université Paris Val de Marne) Eric Michael Laviolette (Advancia) Thomas Legrain (TL Conseil) Julien Lévy (HEC Paris) Frédéric Le Roy (Université de Montpellier 1, Sup de Co Montpellier) Thomas Loilier (IAE de Caen Basse-Normandie) Bachir Mazouz (ENAP, Canada) Karim Messeghem (Université de Montpellier 1) Christophe Midler (CRG, Ecole Polytechnique) Danny Miller (HEC Montréal) Geneviève Poulingue (EM Normandie) Isabelle Royer (Université de Lille 1) Richard Soparnot (ESCEM) Thierry Verstraete (Université de Bordeaux 4, Bordeaux Ecole de Management) Caroline Verzat (Advancia) 3 www.journeesgeorgesdoriot.org IMPORTANT DATES - deadline for submitting extended summaries (minimum 4 pages): 30 September 2009 The four-page extended summary should give details of the problem, the theoretical orientation, the methodology, the type of results expected. - reply from Scientific Committee: 15 November 2009 - deadline for submission of final versions: 15 January 2010 (this date must be respected due to the time needed to produce the CD-ROMs of the proceedings). A special scientific committee will be responsible for checking the quality of the final versions and responding to requests from evaluators. CONTRIBUTION FORMATS In addition to academic papers and case studies , papers with strong managerial implications will be given close attention. Contributors are also asked to bear in mind when writing their paper that the Georges Doriot Conferences welcome a large number of practitioners. PUBLICATION PLANS • Alongside the publication of the proceedings, the call for papers will be linked to a call for papers from a high level French journal according to the usual procedures of this journal. Previous editions of the Georges Doriot Conference have led to publications in Economies et Sociétés Série K Economie de l’Entreprise and Management International . Only papers which have not been published in any other form of publication, conference or journal will be considered. The final announcement concerning partnerships will take place in July 2009. PROVISIONAL ORGANISING COMMITTEE Alain Bloch, Lucie Bégin, Maria Bonnafous Boucher, Didier Chabaud, Roland Condor, Stéphanie Esnault, Olivier Germain, Térence Geffroy, Jérôme Guédon, Gervais Johanet, Jean- Louis Lacolley, Geneviève Poulingue. 4 www.journeesgeorgesdoriot.org FORMAT FOR PROPOSALS Word RTF Format Four pages maximum Times New Roman - Character size 12 - Single-spaced The extended abstract including its problems, the conceptual framework, methodology and device outcomes. Five to ten bibliographical references essential On a separate page, please indicate the surname, first name, full institutional details, phone number, fax and e-mail address of each author. Your proposals should be sent to the following address: [email protected] FORMAT FOR FINAL PAPERS The final papers , written in French or English, should be presented as follows : • Word RTF format on A4 paper; • 25 pages maximum including numbered diagrams and tables; • 1.5 spaced including bibliographical notes (single spaced); • Font: Times New Roman, size 12 • Headings and sub-headings in bold, numbered 1, 1.1, 1.1.1, etc.; • Page numbers centred at the foot of the page • 2.5 cm margins at top, bottom, left and right. • Bibliographical references listed at the end of the document • The names of authors included in the body of the text should be in brackets and followed by the year of publication and the pages if quoted; The summaries should be presented as follows: • One page maximum preceding the paper proper and summarising the problem posed in the paper. GENERAL FORM The first page should give the title, names, position and full contact details of the author(s) and a summary of the paper. The second page should feature the same elements except for the names, position and contact details of the author(s) (in order to respect the anonymous evaluation procedure). The following pages, the first of which should be numbered ‘1’, will contain the paper. 5 www.journeesgeorgesdoriot.org .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Kramlich Dick Donated.Pdf
    National Venture Capital Association Venture Capital Oral History Project Funded by Charles W. Newhall III C. Richard Kramlich Interview Conducted and Edited by Mauree Jane Perry 2006 All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The National Venture Capital Association and C. Richard Kramlich, dated January 9, 2009. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to the National Venture Capital Association. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the National Venture Capital Association. Requests for permission to quote for publication should be addressed to the National Venture Capital Association, 1655 North Fort Myer Drive, Suite 850, Arlington, Virginia 22209, or faxed to: 703-524-3940. All requests should include identification of the specific passages to be quoted, anticipated use of the passages, and identification of the user. Recommended citation: C. Richard Kramlich, “Venture Capital Greats: A Conversation with C. Richard Kramlich,” interviewed by Mauree Jane Perry on August 31, 2006, in San Francisco, California, National Venture Capital Association, Arlington, Virginia. Copyright © 2009 by the National Venture Capital Association www.nvca.org This collection of interviews, Venture Capital Greats, recognizes the contributions of individuals who have followed in the footsteps of early venture capital pioneers such as Andrew Mellon and Laurance Rockefeller, J. H. Whitney and Georges Doriot, and the mid-century associations of Draper, Gaither & Anderson and Davis & Rock — families and firms who financed advanced technologies and built iconic US companies. Each interviewee was asked to reflect on his formative years, his career path, and the subsequent challenges faced as a venture capitalist.
    [Show full text]
  • National Venture Capital Association Venture Capital Oral History Project Funded by Charles W
    National Venture Capital Association Venture Capital Oral History Project Funded by Charles W. Newhall III William H. Draper III Interview Conducted and Edited by Mauree Jane Perry October, 2005 All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to the National Venture Capital Association. No part of the manuscript may be quoted for publication without the written permission of the National Venture Capital Association. Requests for permission to quote for publication should be addressed to the National Venture Capital Association, 1655 North Fort Myer Drive, Suite 850, Arlington, Virginia 22209, or faxed to: 703-524-3940. All requests should include identification of the specific passages to be quoted, anticipated use of the passages, and identification of the user. Copyright © 2009 by the National Venture Capital Association www.nvca.org This collection of interviews, Venture Capital Greats, recognizes the contributions of individuals who have followed in the footsteps of early venture capital pioneers such as Andrew Mellon and Laurance Rockefeller, J. H. Whitney and Georges Doriot, and the mid-century associations of Draper, Gaither & Anderson and Davis & Rock — families and firms who financed advanced technologies and built iconic US companies. Each interviewee was asked to reflect on his formative years, his career path, and the subsequent challenges faced as a venture capitalist. Their stories reveal passion and judgment, risk and rewards, and suggest in a variety of ways what the small venture capital industry has contributed to the American economy. As the venture capital industry prepares for a new market reality in the early years of the 21st century, the National Venture Capital Association reports (2008) that venture capital investments represented 2% of US GDP and was responsible for 10.4 million American jobs and 2.3 trillion in sales.
    [Show full text]
  • Copyrighted Material
    pter O ha n C e An Historic Overview of Venture Capitalism • Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it. —George Santayana Why is an historical overview of VC important? Because history does in fact repeat itself, and a study of history allows us to frame an ­understanding of the present and the future. The playersCOPYRIGHTED and the investment climate MATERIAL change, but the entrepreneur’s innate instinct to risk capital for a return is no different today from what it was when John D. Rockefeller became America’s first billionaire in 1900. When Andrew c01.indd 1 10-12-2013 8:50:11 [2] The Little Book of Venture Capital Investing Carnegie joined forces with his childhood friend, Henry Phipps, to form Carnegie Steel in 1892, they were driven by the same conviction to improve the status quo as are the idealistic dream chasers of the twenty-first century. It was these early trailblazers who paved the way and developed the techniques that have laid the foundation for VC as we know it today. Arguably, historians will debate the nature of history and its usefulness. This includes using the discipline as a way of providing perspective on the problems and opportu- nities of the present. I believe it to be an important tool in providing a systematic account and window to the future. It is patently dishonest and irresponsible to perpetuate the popular mythology that those who created great wealth in America are to be despised and that there are no useful les- sons to be learned from an objective, historical review of their contributions to the subject at hand.
    [Show full text]
  • Discovering Doriot Societies
    is idea defied financial logic. It would take too on to become one of Harvard’s most influential Hlong, the risks were too high, and the rewards professors, whose 40-year teaching span inspired too small. Wall Street experts said it’d never work. some of the most prominent executives of the day, But, never say never. Proving the naysayers including Fred Smith, founder of Federal Express, wrong, this man watched a single investment earn and Ralph Hoagland, co-founder of CVS Corp. over 500,000 percent — seeing that investment In 1940, he received his U.S. citizenship and, more than double every year for nine straight years. the following year, enlisted in the U.S. Army. A It’s a mind-boggling number. To put it in lieutenant colonel and chief of military planning perspective, if you invested $1,000, a 500,000 for the Quartermaster Corps, Doriot put his percent increase would yield a $5 million windfall. manufacturing skills to good use by upgrading That’s impressive, considering this was an idea that military equipment, which earned him a wasn’t supposed to be viable. promotion to brigadier general. His improvements That alone would be a great ending to the story, included better shoes, cold-weather gear, uniforms, but it marked just the beginning of something tents, sunscreens, insecticides, freeze-dried foods, that would turn this man’s seemingly strange idea and powdered coffee. into industry standard practice. He changed the Then, due to a shortage of metallic armor in way we seek opportunities, the way we calculate 1942, he was called to oversee the invention of a risks, and the way we make serious money.
    [Show full text]
  • Jamieson Burgess.Pdf
    Regional Oral History Office University of California The Bancroft Library Berkeley, California J. Burgess Jamieson BAY AREA VENTURE CAPITALISTS: SHAPING THE ECONOMIC AND BUSINESS LANDSCAPE Interviews conducted by Sally Smith Hughes in 2009 Copyright © 2010 by The Regents of the University of California ii Since 1954 the Regional Oral History Office has been interviewing leading participants in or well-placed witnesses to major events in the development of Northern California, the West, and the nation. Oral History is a method of collecting historical information through tape-recorded interviews between a narrator with firsthand knowledge of historically significant events and a well-informed interviewer, with the goal of preserving substantive additions to the historical record. The tape recording is transcribed, lightly edited for continuity and clarity, and reviewed by the interviewee. The corrected manuscript is bound with photographs and illustrative materials and placed in The Bancroft Library at the University of California, Berkeley, and in other research collections for scholarly use. Because it is primary material, oral history is not intended to present the final, verified, or complete narrative of events. It is a spoken account, offered by the interviewee in response to questioning, and as such it is reflective, partisan, deeply involved, and irreplaceable. ********************************* All uses of this manuscript are covered by a legal agreement between The Regents of the University of California and J. Burgess Jamieson, dated January 15, 2010. The manuscript is thereby made available for research purposes. All literary rights in the manuscript, including the right to publish, are reserved to The Bancroft Library of the University of California, Berkeley.
    [Show full text]
  • INSEAD from Intuition to Institution
    INSEAD From Intuition to Institution JEAN-LOUIS BARSOUX © Insead 2000 Softcover reprint of the hardcover 1st edition 2000 978-0-333-80398-1 All rights reserved. No reproduction, copy or transmission of this publication may be made without written permission. No paragraph of this publication may be reproduced, copied or transmitted save with written permission or in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, or under the terms of any licence permitting limited copying issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1P 0LP. Any person who does any unauthorised act in relation to this publication may be liable to criminal prosecution and civil claims for damages. The author has asserted his right to be identified as the author of this work in accordance with the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988. First published 2000 by MACMILLAN PRESS LTD Houndmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire RG21 6XS and London Companies and representatives throughout the world ISBN 978-1-349-42222-7 ISBN 978-0-333-98184-9 (eBook) DOI 10.1057/9780333981849 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. This book is printed on paper suitable for recycling and made from fully managed and sustained forest sources. 10987654321 09 08 07 06 05 04 03 02 01 00 Contents List of Plates page iv Acknowledgements ix Introduction: Ecrire, c’est choisir xi PART 1: FROM I NCEPTION TO O BSCURITY 1 Getting to the Drawing Board 3 2 Believing Something Into Being 25 PART 2: FROM O BSCURITY TO R ESPECTABILITY 3 Fighting Above its Weight 53 4 Here to Stay 83 PART 3: FROM R ESPECTABILITY TO P ROMINENCE 5 A Faculty For Renewal 109 6 Keeping the Show on the Road 131 PART 4: FROM P ROMINENCE TO I MPACT 7 Coming of Age 159 8 Taking on the World 185 9 Pillars of the Estabishment 211 Appendices 221 Index 243 List of Plates 1 The Palace at Fontainebleau 2 Georges Doriot 3 Inauguration ceremony of Insead at Fontainebleau Palace on 9th October 1959: W.
    [Show full text]
  • Mccombs Knowledge to Go
    McCombs Knowledge To Go January 12, 2010 Venture Capital and Private Equity The Past, Present and Future Professor Jim Nolen Finance Department Overview . The Private Equity Industry has been characterized by boom/bust cycles. Both venture capital and private equity have been impacted by the current economic environment with many predicting the industry will go through a significant transition or even contraction. This webcast will review the origins of the industry, highlight the current industry trends and issues, and discuss what the future may hold for the industry. The assessment framework will explore the four main activities of private equity professionals: fundraising, investing/deploying capital, managing the portfolio, and exits/harvesting the investment. 3 The Private Equity Asset Class . Private Equity is investing in or acquiring the securities of non-public companies. Private Equity firms can be broken down into two main categories (excluding fund of funds): . Venture Capital Firms (Private, Corporate & SBIC) . Seed Stage, Early Stage, Later Stage, & Growth Capital . Private Equity Firms . Leveraged Buyouts, Management Buyouts, Mezzanine Capital, PIPEs, Merchant Banks, BDCs & Distressed Investments . Venture firms invest in young or emerging companies and may take a minority interest while LBO firms invest in mature firms and typically take a majority control. According to NVCA, from 1970-2008, venture capital backed firms have accounted for 12.1 million jobs and $2.9 trillion in revenues. Origins of the U.S. Private Equity Market IN THE BEGINNING…… Merchant Banks in London and Paris provided acquisition capital and minority investments in private firms going back to the 1850s in Europe. These firms also financed many of the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Sofinance the Venture Capital Industry As an Alternative Source of Financing for Small and Medium Industrial Enterprises-Sofinance Case Study
    113 95 2020 02 09 : Sofinance The Venture Capital Industry as an alternative source of financing for small and medium industrial enterprises-Sofinance Case Study- 2 1 [email protected] 1 [email protected] 2 2020 12 31 2020 12 02 2020 10 31 Sofinance Sofinance Sofinance Sofinance G24 JEL Abstract: This study aims to define venture capital and highlight its characteristics and effectiveness as an alternative to financing for small and medium-sized industrial enterprises. It also aims to highlight the extent of the contribution of the company "Sofinance" to the financing of small and medium- sized industrial enterprises using the risk capital technique. The study concluded that venture capital is an effective alternative to financing small and medium-sized industrial enterprises, as it goes well with one of its most important financial characteristics, which is the property of information asymmetry. It also concluded that the number of small and medium- sized enterprises operating in the industrial sector and financed by the company "Sofinance" according to the venture capital technique remains acceptable if we consider the total number of small and medium-sized enterprises financed by the technique of risk capital in the company "Sofinance". Keywords: Venture capital industry, The financing, Small and medium-sized industrial enterprises, Company "Sofinance". Jel Classification Codes: G24 [email protected] 95 1 Sofinance Sofinance 96 Sofinance Sofinance Sofinance 2 1.2 1899 Georges Doriot (Harvard (Mangement 1921 Business School) (Bouatouata, 2005, p. 70) 1926 industriel) (La recherche- George Doriot 1940 (Bouatouata, 2005, pp. 69-71) George Doriot 97 (Bouatouata, 2005, p.
    [Show full text]
  • Venture Capital's Grandfather Georges Doriot Helped Lay Groundwork for 128 Tech Cluster
    THIS STORY HAS BEEN FORMATTED FOR EASY PRINTING INNOVATION ECONOMY Venture capital's grandfather Georges Doriot helped lay groundwork for 128 tech cluster By Scott Kirsner | April 6, 2008 Without him, Digital Equipment Corp. might never have gotten started, and the electronics-testing company Teradyne Inc. might not have survived beyond infancy. He backed an oil rig-manufacturing company run by George H.W. Bush. The current Secretary of Energy, Samuel Bodman, once worked for his Boston firm. And a half-century ago, he put $50,000 into a company called Ionics Inc. that was trying to find new ways to desalinate seawater; GE bought the company in 2004 for $1.1 billion. Georges Doriot is the forgotten grandfather of the modern venture capital industry. His Boston firm, American Research and Development, or ARD, helped lay the foundation for the Route 128 technology cluster. "After World War II, all the textile mills had gone away, and war time production was going away," says Spencer Ante, a Business Week editor who has written a new book on Doriot, "Creative Capital," that is hitting stores this week. "Doriot and ARD were really trying to revive the New England economy after the war." Doriot also played a role in shifting the focus of the US economy, from one that regarded big conglomerates like US Steel as its pillars to one that now lionizes nimble, fast-growing start-up companies like Google. Ripples of Doriot's influence can still be seen in the local technology and venture capital landscape. "He was one of the great figures of the twentieth century, as much as J.P.
    [Show full text]
  • Private Equity - Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia Page 1 of 15
    Private equity - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Page 1 of 15 Private equity From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Financial market In finance, private equity is an asset class consisting of equity securities participants in operating companies that are not publicly traded on a stock exchange. Investments in private equity most often involves either an investment of capital into an operating company or the acquisition of an operating company. Capital for private equity is raised primarily from institutional investors. There is a wide array of types and styles of private equity and the term private equity has different connotations in different countries. [1] Collective investment schemes Among the most common investment strategies in private equity include Credit Unions leveraged buyouts, venture capital, growth capital, distressed Insurance companies investments and mezzanine capital. In a typical leveraged buyout Investment banks transaction, the private equity firm buys majority control of an existing Pension funds or mature firm. This is distinct from a venture capital or growth capital Prime Brokers investment, in which the private equity firm typically invests in young or Trusts emerging companies, and rarely obtain majority control. Contents Finance series Financial market Participants 1 Types of private equity Corporate finance 1.1 Leveraged buyout Personal finance 1.2 Venture capital Public finance 1.3 Growth capital Banks and Banking 1.4 Distressed and Special Situations Financial regulation 1.5 Mezzanine capital 1.6
    [Show full text]
  • 8Èmes Journées Georges Doriot - Entrepreneuriat Et Société
    10/12/2019 1 8èmes Journées Georges Doriot - Entrepreneuriat et Société HEC Paris, EM Normandie et ESG-UQAM 28 & 29 mai 2020 Paris L’entrepreneuriat à l’heure d’un effondrement sociétal ? Rôles, responsabilités et défis Appel à communications Georges Doriot fut comme Professeur à Harvard un pionnier de l’enseignement et de la recherche en gestion et introduisit en France au début des années 1930 la méthode des cas au CPA, devenu l’Executive MBA du groupe HEC Paris. Promu Général de l’armée américaine durant la 2ème guerre mondiale, il fut aussi un des « inventeurs » du capital risque après-guerre aux États-Unis et fit fortune en participant à la création de DEC. Pourquoi des journées Georges Doriot ? Tous les deux ans, les journées Georges Doriot sont l’occasion de mettre en pratique trois principes forts : - l’intelligence pratique : l’entrepreneuriat est un champ où l’imbrication entre les pratiques et les réflexions académiques est nécessaire et fructueuse. - Une vocation transdisciplinaire : ces journées doivent permettre d’aborder les phénomènes entrepreneuriaux sous diverses facettes : managériale, juridique, psychologique, historique, etc… Outre les sciences de gestion, les journées sont ouvertes aux spécialistes des sciences économiques, des sciences juridiques, des sciences cognitives, et plus largement des sciences humaines et sociales. - La relation entre entrepreneuriat et société : les journées Doriot souhaitent mettre l’accent sur l’entrepreneuriat comme agent des transformations sociales et non réduire l’entrepreneuriat à la création de richesse. 8èmes Journées Georges Doriot "L’entrepreneuriat à l’heure d’un effondrement sociétal ? Rôles, responsabilités et défis", PARIS, 28 & 29 mai 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • History of Private Equity and Venture Capital 1 History of Private Equity and Venture Capital
    History of private equity and venture capital 1 History of private equity and venture capital The history of private equity and venture capital and the development of these asset classes has occurred through a series of boom and bust cycles since the middle of the 20th century. Within the broader private equity industry, two distinct sub-industries, leveraged buyouts and venture capital experienced growth along parallel, although interrelated tracks. Since the origins of the modern private equity industry in 1946, there have been four major epochs marked by three boom and bust cycles. The early history of private equity—from 1946 through 1981—was characterized by relatively small volumes of private equity investment, rudimentary firm organizations and limited awareness of and familiarity with the private equity industry. The first boom and bust cycle, from 1982 through 1993, was characterized by the dramatic surge in leveraged buyout activity financed by junk bonds and culminating in the massive buyout of RJR Nabisco before the near collapse of the leveraged buyout industry in the late 1980s and early 1990s. The second boom and bust cycle (from 1992 through 2002) emerged out of the ashes of the savings and loan crisis, the insider trading scandals, the real estate market collapse and the recession of the early 1990s. This period saw the emergence of more institutionalized private equity firms, ultimately culminating in the massive Dot-com bubble in 1999 and 2000. The third boom and bust cycle (from 2003 through 2007) came in the wake of the collapse of the Dot-com bubble—leveraged buyouts reach unparalleled size and the institutionalization of private equity firms is exemplified by the Blackstone Group's 2007 initial public offering.
    [Show full text]