Chapter 1: Introduction

UNIVERSITY OF PISA DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE DOTTORATO DI RICERCA (PhD) IN COMPUTER SCIENCE PhD THESIS Process Models for Learning Patterns in FLOSS Repositories Patrick Mukala SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR Prof. Franco Turini Dr. Antonio Cerone ADVISORY COMMITTEE Prof. Turini Dr. Cerone Prof. Pedreschi Dr. Gervasi 2015 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This thesis would not have been possible without the guidance and the help of several individuals who in one way or another contributed and provided valuable assistance in the preparation and completion of this research. First and foremost, my utmost gratitude to the Almighty God: without Him, none of this would have been possible. I owe Him my life and everything that I will ever accomplish. His grace and guidance have been the rock for the continuation of this research. It is because of the support, patience and guidance of the following people that the completion of this thesis has been possible. To them, I owe my deepest gratitude: Professor Franco Turini and Dr. Antonio Cerone, who undertook to act as my supervisors, despite their many other academic and professional commitments; their expertise, vast knowledge and guidance were very significant in the realization of this study. Furthermore, my gratitude goes to all the members of the advisory committee, Professor Pedreschi and Dr. Gervasi for their invaluable input and feedback during the evaluations throughout the period of this thesis. I would also like to extend my gratitude to Professor Degano, the chair of the PhD school, for all his help and support during my time in the Computer Science department. And finally, I am grateful for the undying support I have received throughout this period from my family. My wife has been my rock during this time; I thank her for leaving her job to be with me in Pisa; my parents, Corneille Mulamba and Esther Ngalula, for their steadfast encouragement while I was completing this research. The research work carried out in this thesis started within the UNU-IIST project Peer-Production Approaches to e-Learning (PPAeL), led by Dr. Antonio Cerone and supported by Macao Science and Technology Development Fund, File No. 019/2011/A1. A scholarship from the United Nations University supported me during my PhD time in Pisa. i This thesis is dedicated to my princess, my daughter: Eliore-Valerie ii ABSTRACT Evidence suggests that Free/Libre Open Source Software (FLOSS) environments provide unlimited learning opportunities. Community members engage in a number of activities both during their interaction with their peers and while making use of these environments’ repositories. To date, numerous studies document the existence of learning processes in FLOSS through surveys or by means of questionnaires filled by FLOSS projects participants. At the same time, there is a surge in developing tools and techniques for extracting and analyzing data from different FLOSS data sources that has birthed a new field called Mining Software Repositories (MSR). In spite of these growing tools and techniques for mining FLOSS repositories, there is limited or no existing approaches to providing empirical evidence of learning processes directly from these repositories. Therefore, in this work we sought to trigger such an initiative by proposing an approach based on Process Mining. With this technique, we aim to trace learning behaviors from FLOSS participants’ trails of activities as recorded in FLOSS repositories. We identify the participants as Novices and Experts. A Novice is defined as any FLOSS member that benefits from a learning experience through acquiring new skills while the Expert is the provider of these skills. The significance of our work is mainly twofold. First and foremost, we extend the MSR field by showing the potential of mining FLOSS repositories by applying Process Mining techniques. Lastly, our work provides critical evidence that boosts the understanding of learning behavior in FLOSS communities by analyzing the relevant repositories. In order to accomplish this, we have proposed and implemented a methodology that follows a seven-step approach including developing an appropriate terminology or ontology for learning processes in FLOSS, contextualizing learning processes through a-priori models, generating Event Logs, generating corresponding process models, interpreting and evaluating the value of process discovery, performing conformance analysis and verifying a number of formulated hypotheses with regard to tracing learning patterns in FLOSS communities. The implementation of this approach has resulted in the development of the Ontology of Learning in FLOSS (OntoLiFLOSS) environments that defines the terms needed to describe learning processes in FLOSS as well as providing a visual representation of these processes through Petri net-like Workflow nets. Moreover, another novelty pertains to the mining of FLOSS repositories by defining and describing the preliminaries required for preprocessing FLOSS data before applying Process Mining techniques for analysis. Through a step-by-step process, we effectively detail how the Event Logs are constructed through generating key phrases and making use of Semantic Search. Taking a FLOSS environment called Openstack as our data source, we apply our proposed techniques to identify learning activities based on key phrases catalogs and classification rules expressed through pseudo code as well as the appropriate Process Mining tool. We thus produced Event Logs that are based on the semantic content of messages in Openstack’s Mailing archives, Internet Relay Chat (IRC) messages, Reviews, Bug reports and Source code to retrieve the corresponding activities. Considering these repositories in light of the three learning process phases (Initiation, Progression and maturation), we produced an Event Log for each participant (Novice or Expert) in every phase on the corresponding dataset. Hence, we produced 14 Event Logs that helped build 14 corresponding process maps which are visual representation of the flow occurrence of learning activities in FLOSS for each participant. These process maps provide critical indications that speak volumes in terms of the presence of learning processes in the analyzed repositories. The results show that learning activities do occur at a significant rate during messages exchange on both Mailing archives and IRC messages. The slight differences between the two datasets can be highlighted in two ways. First, the involvement of Experts is more on iii IRC than it is on Mailing archives with 7.22% and 0.36% of Expert involvement respectively on IRC forums and Mailing lists. This can be justified by the differences in the length of messages sent on these two datasets. The average length of sent messages is 3261 characters for an email compared to 60 characters for a chat message. The evidence produced from this mining experiment solidifies the finding in terms of the existence of learning processes in FLOSS as well as the scale at which they occur. While the Initiation phase shows the Novice as the most involved in the start of the learning process, during Progression phase the involvement of the Expert can be seen to be significantly increasing. In order to trace the advanced skills in the Maturation phase, we look at repositories that store data about developing, creating code, examining and reviewing the code, identifying and fixing possible bugs. Therefore, we consider three repositories including Source Code, Bug reports and Reviews. The results obtained in this phase largely justify the choice of these three datasets to track learning behavior at this stage. Both the Bug reports and the Source code demonstrate the commitment of the Novice to seek answers and interact as much as possible in strengthening the acquired skills. With a participation of 49.22% for the Novice against 46.72% for the Expert and 46.19 % against 42.04% respectively on Bug reports and Source code, the Novice still engages significantly in learning. On the last dataset, Reviews, we notice an increase in the Expert’s role. The Expert performs activities to the tune of 40.36 % of total number of activities against 22.17 % for the Novice. The last steps of our methodology steer the comparison of the defined a-priori models with final models that describe how learning processes occur according to the actual behavior from Event Logs. Our attempts to producing process models start with depicting process maps to track the actual behaviour as it occurs in Openstack repositories, before concluding with final Petri net models representative of learning processes in FLOSS as a result of conformance analysis. For every dataset in the corresponding learning phase, we produce 3 process maps respectively depicting the overall learning behaviour for all FLOSS community members (Novice or Expert together), then the Novice and Expert. In total, we produced 21 process maps, empirically describing process models on real data, 14 process models in the form of Petri nets for every participant on each dataset. We make use of the Artificial Immune System (AIS) algorithms to merge the 14 Event Logs that uniquely capture the behaviour of every participant on different datasets in the three phases. We then reanalyze the resulting logs in order to produce 6 global models that inclusively provide a comprehensive depiction of participants’ learning behavior in FLOSS communities. This description hints that Workflow nets introduced as our a-priori models give rather a more simplistic representation of learning

Load more