DOCSLIB.ORG

Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 27/10/2011, 19.30

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Agenda Reports Pack (Public) 27/10/2011, 19.30 If you require further information about this agenda please contact: Wendy Merry, Telephone 020 8583 2061, e-mail [email protected]. SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE A meeting of the Sustainable Development Committee will be held in the Committee Rooms 1 & 2, Civic Centre, Lampton Road, Hounslow on Thursday, 27 October 2011 at 7:30 pm MEMBERSHIP Mohinder Gill- Chair Mindu Bains, Felicity Barwood, Tom Bruce, Ruth Cadbury, Steve Curran, Samantha Davies, Gopal Dhillon, Bradley Fisher, Darshan Grewal, Elizabeth Hughes, Paul Jabbal, Sheila O'Reilly, Sohan Sangha and Allan Wilson. AGENDA 1. Apologies for absence 2. Declarations of interest under the Town Planning Code of Practice or any other communications from Members 3. Minutes of the meeting held on 29 September 2011 (Pages 1 - 13) Protocol for Speakers Members of the public or applicants should contact the Committee Administrator, Wendy Merry on 020 8583 2061 with details of the proposed submission no later than 5pm, on 20 October 2011. Notification will be given of the Chair’s decision with regard to the request to speak. For planning applications, the applicants will only be allowed to speak if there is an objector who wishes to address the Committee. In exceptional circumstances the Chair may agree that an applicant who would significantly add to the information already available will be allowed to speak at the Committee in the absence of an objector. Where both parties address the Committee, the order of speaking will be the applicant, followed by the objector. Each party will be given no more than 5 minutes to speak. Planning Applications for Decision 4. Addendum Report (Pages 14 - 22) An Addendum report will be published shortly before the meeting with any additional information relating to agenda items not available at the time of publication of the main agenda. 5. West Thames College, Isleworth (Pages 23 - 39) 6. Land at Chiswick Roundabout, junction of Gunnersbury Avenue and (Pages 40 - 117) Great West Road 7. Tara House Montessori School, Wilson Walk, Prebend Gardens, (Pages 118 - Chiswick - adjourned 126) This item has now been adjourned and will be heard at the meeting to be held on Monday 7 November. 8. Dukes Meadows Golf Club, Dukes Meadow, Dan Mason Drive, (Pages 127 - Chiswick 167) 9. Boston Playing Fields, Boston Gardens, Brentford (Pages 168 - 183) 10. 13 Bridge Wharf Road, Isleworth - adjourned (Pages 184 - 207) This item has now been adjourned and will be heard at the meeting to be held on Monday 7 November. 11. 29 Chiswick High Road, Chiswick (Pages 208 - 247) 12. 137 Chiswick High Road, Chiswick (Pages 248 - 268) 13. Gunnersbury Station, Station Approach, Chiswick High Road, (Pages 269 - Chiswick - adjourned 284) This item has now been adjourned and will be heard at the meeting to be held on Monday 7 November. 14. 5 Hardwicke Avenue, Hounslow - adjourned (Pages 285 - 296) This item has now been adjourned and will be heard at the meeting to be held on Monday 7 November. 15. 111 Power Road, Chiswick - adjourned (Pages 297 - 333) This item has now been adjourned and will be heard at the meeting to be held on Monday 7 November. Other Planning Matters 16. Guidance on national planning policies (Pages 334 - 336) The following note is intended to supplement individual committee reports and provides guidance to Members on National Planning Policy for consideration in reaching decisions and/or providing comments on planning applications. 17. Any other business, which the Chair considers urgent. 18. The date of the next scheduled meeting is 24 November 2011 DECLARING INTERESTS Committee members are reminded that if they have a personal interest in any matter being discussed at the meeting they must declare the interest and if the interest is also a prejudicial interest then they may not take part in any discussion or vote on the matter. R A Gruet LLB - Assistant Director Corporate Governance London Borough of Hounslow, Civic Centre, Lampton Road, Hounslow TW3 4DN 27 October 2011 At a meeting of the Sustainable Development Committee held onAgenda Thursday, Item 29 September 3 2011 at 7:30 pm at Committee Rooms 1 & 2, Civic Centre, Lampton Road, Hounslow. Present: Councillor Mohinder Gill (Chair) Councillors Felicity Barwood, Tom Bruce, Ruth Cadbury, Steve Curran, Gopal Dhillon, Bradley Fisher, Darshan Grewal, Paul Jabbal, Sheila O'Reilly and Sohan Sangha Apologies for Absence Councillors Mindu Bains, Samantha Davies and Elizabeth Hughes. 39. Declarations of interest under the Town Planning Code of Practice or any other communications from Members Item 5: 33 South Street, Isleworth All Members had received a communication in connection with this item. Item 10: Manor Lane Estate, Manor Lane, Feltham Councillor Jabbal declared that the item had been previously presented to West Area Committee. 40. Minutes of the meeting held on 17 August 2011 The minutes of the meeting held on 17 August 2011 (agenda item 3) were agreed. 41. Addendum Report - published 28 September 2011 The report was noted. 42. 33 South Street, Isleworth See report by Nikolas Smith, Planning Officer (agenda item 5) and the Addendum Report. With the permission of the Chair, Mark Pender addressed the Committee on behalf of the applicant and made the following points: • Planning permission had been granted for flats at the site. • Planning permission was only needed for the extensions and the pub itself could be converted without planning permission. • The building was designed to ensure that privacy was protected. • Sainsburys could successfully co-exist with local traders. • 20-25 jobs would be created and there was a commitment from the applicant to employ people from the local area. • The proposals complied with planning policy. • There would be six parking spaces available for residents within the site, which was compliant with the Council’s maximum parking standards. • It was normal practice for deliveries to take place from on-street loading bays and there were other businesses in South Street serviced by deliveries, which relied on on-street loading bays. • The officer’s report showed that two of the units were below the space standards, but Mr Pender believed that adjustments could be made if necessary. • Changes had been made to the proposals in response to comments made by the Area Committee. 1 • Mr Pender believed that the proposals would be a positive addition to the area. In response to Members’ questions, Mr Pender advised it was difficult to predict how many customers were likely to use the store, but an assessment using Government data had shown that there was likely to be sufficient expenditure in the area until 2014 to accommodate both the new store and local shops. Mr Pender described the design as contemporary with a traditional twist, which he felt maintained the appearance and character of the area although he acknowledged that the design was subjective. With the permission of the Chair, Rosemary Bunce spoke in objection to the proposals. She stated that she represented the Isleworth Society and had also liaised with shopkeepers and local residents. She supported the residential part of the proposals, but had concerns about the retail outlet and made the following points: • There would be an unacceptable impact on traffic flow, particularly when deliveries were being made and parked delivery vehicles would block the view for motorists and pedestrians. • The operational times of the loading bay were from 8-9 am, which was the busiest time in South Street and the loading bay would be installed where the school crossing patrol was. There was no reason to believe that there would be only one delivery vehicle in the loading bay at a time. • There was no parking provision for the retail outlet. • Parking on the adjacent roads was already at a premium although the applicant was assuming that no further parking spaces were needed. • There were no details provided about recycling other than to say that it would be stored in the unit. • There would be a detrimental impact from the proposals on residents. • The Area Committee had recommended refusal. • The officer’s responses had been negative to the resident’s objections. Cathy Gallagher, Assistant Director – Environment Department (Regulatory & Development Services) highlighted the main points in the report and summarised that, in most respects, the proposals met the Council’s requirements and that it was for Members to decide whether they liked the modern approach to the design. In response to Members’ questions, Ms Gallagher confirmed that the applicant could change from A4 (pub) to A1 (retail) use without permission. Planning permission was required because extensions were being proposed at the same time as the change of use. There were two extensions being proposed, which would not be seen from the public domain. She also confirmed that there would be an increase in floor space. With regard to the density, Ms Gallagher advised that flats would be built above the pub and there would be a new building at the front of the site. There would be an increase in the floor area covered by approximately two thirds. Most of the site was currently empty because it was a car park and the proposals would mean that area would be built on. Ms Gallagher advised that a full impact assessment was not needed because the site was in a town centre, where it was established that shops should be retained. A retail study had been provided and it was the officers’ view that the type of retail proposed would be appropriate because there was capacity to enhance provision and provide a range of facilities. Chris Calvi-Freeman, Head of Transport, advised that there was a 25m pay & display area to 2 the east of the site, which would be converted to a loading bay and the four pay & display spaces would be relocated.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Old Chiswick Protection Society
    Old Chiswick Protection Society Autumn 2020 Newsletter Old Chiswick Protection Society exists to preserve and enhance the amenities of this riverside conservation area. Even the geese are social distancing! [Photograph: David Humphreys] Chairman’s Message As we look back at the last months, the Old Chiswick Conservation Area has become even more precious to many of us who live here, work here or visit. We have seen and spoken with visitors, previously unfamiliar with our environment and its atmosphere and history, who are enjoying it for the first time. Nature carries on here regardless, and our history continues to be relevant and vital to our future. We can't take anything for granted though. It is only with the support of our members' subscriptions and diligent work that we are here today and can be so proud of what has been achieved by the charity over the last 60 years. Old Chiswick could so easily have looked and felt very different: no Chiswick Eyot, with its unique withy beds and nature reserve; houses where Homefields Recreation Ground South is; an entirely different main road into and out of London, sacrificing more historical buildings; post-war housing instead of Georgian houses along Chiswick Mall. Our community has done much to help others this year, and we continue to build relationships with those like Asahi who are new to the area since taking over Fuller’s Brewery, and who have expressed a wish to become part of the community. We look forward to inviting you to join our AGM this year, which will of course be conducted on line, with the very latest advice on meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Dukes Meadows Golf Club, Chiswick
    planning report PDU/2436a/01 26 July 2011 Dukes Meadows Golf Club, Chiswick in the London Borough of Hounslow planning application no. Strategic planning application stage 1 referral (new powers) Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 The proposal Retrospective permission for; the reinstatement of nine tennis courts, erection of a demountable, air cushioned dome over five of the tennis courts, associated fencing, surfacing and floodlighting. The applicant The applicant is Stephen Marks. Strategic issues Whether the ‘very special circumstances’ put forward by the applicant are sufficient to justify ‘inappropriate development’ on MOL. Recommendation That Hounslow Council be advised that the application does not comply with the London Plan, for the reasons set out in paragraph 37 of this report. The application does not need to be referred back to the Mayor if Hounslow Council resolves to refuse permission, but it must be referred back if Hounslow Council resolves to grant permission. Context 1 On 20 June 2011 the Mayor of London received documents from Hounslow Council notifying him of a planning application of potential strategic importance to develop the above site for the above uses. Under the provisions of The Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008 the Mayor has until 29 July 2011 to provide the Council with a statement setting out whether he considers that the application complies with the London Plan, and his reasons for taking that view. The Mayor may also provide other comments. This report sets out information for the Mayor’s use in deciding what decision to make.
    [Show full text]
  • Dukes Meadows, Dan Mason Drive, Chiswick in the London Borough of Hounslow Planning Application No
    planning report D&P/2436f/01 5 February 2018 Dukes Meadows, Dan Mason Drive, Chiswick in the London Borough of Hounslow planning application no. P/2017/4957 Strategic planning application stage 1 referral Town & Country Planning Act 1990 (as amended); Greater London Authority Acts 1999 and 2007; Town & Country Planning (Mayor of London) Order 2008. The proposal Partial redevelopment of the Dukes Meadows playing fields for enhanced sports and recreational facilities and public realm River frontage improvements. The applicant The applicant is London Borough of Hounslow and the architect is Space and Place. Strategic issues summary Metropolitan Open land: The entire site lies within MOL. The proposal is not inappropriate development on MOL as comprises the provision of appropriate facilities for outdoor sport and recreation. Further, the majority of development takes place within previously developed land and preserves the openness of the MOL, thus meeting the NPPF exception test. The proposal therefore accords with London Plan Policy 7.17, draft London Plan Policy G3, and the NPPF, and GLA officers conclude that there will be no harm caused to the MOL. The proposed rugby groundsman’s dwelling is not considered to be inappropriate development provided it is used exclusively for that purpose. (paragraphs 18 to 29). Sports facilities and community use: A detailed community use agreement for affordable and accessible usage of the sports facilities should be secured by the Council (paragraphs 30 to 32). Urban design, climate change and transport concerns must also be addressed. Recommendation That Hounslow Council be advised that whilst the principle of development is acceptable, the application does not comply with the London Plan and draft London Plan, for the reasons set out in paragraph 46 of this report; but that the possible remedies set out in that paragraph could address these deficiencies.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic Noise Maps of Public Parks in Hounslow May 2018
    Traffic noise maps of public parks in Hounslow May 2018 This document shows traffic noise maps for parks in the borough. The noise maps are taken from http://www.extrium.co.uk/noiseviewer.html. Occasionally, google earth or google map images are included to help the reader identify where the park is located. Similar documents are available for all London Boroughs. These were created as part of research into the impact of traffic noise in London’s parks. They should be read in conjunction with the main report and data analysis which are available at http://www.cprelondon.org.uk/resources/item/2390-noiseinparks. The key to the traffic noise maps is shown here to the right. Orange denotes noise of 55 decibels (dB). Louder noises are denoted by reds and blues with dark blue showing the loudest. Where the maps appear with no colour and are just grey, this means there is no traffic noise of 55dB or above. London Borough of Hounslow 1 1. Beaversfield Park 2. Bedfont Lake Country Park 3. Boston Manor Park 2 4. Chiswick Back Common 5. Crane Valley Park, South West Middlesex Crematorium Gardens, Leitrim Park 6. Dukes Meadows 3 7. Feltham Park, Blenheim Park, Feltham Arena, Glebelands Playing Fields 8. Gunnersbury Park 9. Hanworth Park 4 10. Heston Park 11. Hounslow Heath 12. Inwood Park 5 13. Jersey Gardens, Ridgeway Road North Park 14. Redlees Park 15. Silverhall Park 6 16. St John’s Gardens 17. Thornbury Park (Woodland Rd) 18. Thornbury Park (Great West Road) 7 19. Turnham Green 20. Lampton Park 21.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Our Exhibition to Update the Community Of
    DUKES MEADOWS MASTERPLAN Welcome to our exhibition to update the community of Hounslow about our proposals to regenerate Dukes Meadows delivering new and improved public realm and sporting facilities. The London Borough of Hounslow has appointed a team of architects and sports and leisure specialists to help develop options for the improvements and new facilities. Following the Council’s previous public exhibition, we wanted to update you on how the proposals have evolved in response to your feedback and to inform you of the proposals we are aiming to submit as part of a planning application in the coming months. The Council have been engaging with the leading stakeholders on the site during the last year to agree a mix of facilities and wider proposals for Dukes Meadows across public realm, sport, transport and access. Please take the time to fill in a feedback form and leave it with us today, or complete on online at www.hounslow.gov.uk/consultations 1 DUKES MEADOWS WHAT YOU TOLD US In November 2016 the Council carried out two public consultation events to discuss our emerging proposals for improving the facilities and visitor experience at Dukes Meadows. We also launched an online public consultation to enable more people to view and comment on the proposals. Almost 300 people and stakeholders provided feedback. FEEDBACK FROM THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION Support for a riverside footbridge Increased secure car Tidy/thin trees/ Improve bandstand underneath Barnes parking options foliage/shrubbery and Promenade area Bridge Improve access Improve
    [Show full text]
  • Evidencing the Impact of Primary PE and Sport Premium
    i Evidencing the Impact of Primary PE and Sport Premium DfE Vision for the Primary PE and Sport Premium: “ALL pupils leaving primary school physically literate and with the knowledge, skills and motivation necessary to equip them for a healthy, active lifestyle and lifelong participation in physical activity and sport” Objective: To achieve self-sustaining improvement in the quality of PE & sport in primary schools against Measure against 5 key indicators: the engagement of all pupils in regular physical activity – kick-starting healthy active lifestyles the profile of PE and sport being raised across the school as a tool for whole school improvement increased confidence, knowledge and skills of all staff in teaching PE and sport broader experience of a range of sports and activities offered to all pupils increased participation in competitive sport Statutory requirement of Ofsted to ensure that your Primary PE and Sport Premium spend and priorities is included on your school website. We recommend that you use the Improvement Plan template (below) to serve that purpose. Re-visit the grey boxes on a termly basis, to review and plan. 2018/19 Sport Premium Improvement Plan School: Reach Academy Feltham No. Pupils KS1/KS2: 417 Sport Premium Funds 5 Key Indicators Total Sport Premium £18,000 1. the engagement of all pupils in regular physical activity – kick-starting healthy active lifestyles (Play & Engage, DiscME, C4L, five a day, walk to school….) 2. the profile of PE and sport being raised across the school as a tool for whole school improvement (strategic develop, leaders, transition phase support) 3.
    [Show full text]
  • 13. Upper Thames
    13. Upper Thames Key plan Description The Upper Thames Natural Landscape Area follows the upper reaches of the Thames within Greater London, from Hampton Court and Bushy Park, through Richmond Park and Kew, Dukes Meadow, Barnes and Fulham to Battersea Park. The landform is flat and the whole area is within the largely still tidal Thames floodplain, with the exception of minor outcrops at Dukes Meadows and Putney. However, a slight slope between Fulham and Chelsea follows the overground railway line to Clapham Junction. The Upper Thames area is underlain by London Clay, with superficial 13. Upper Thames Upper 13. deposits of river gravels (Kempton Park Gravel Formation), silts (Langley Silt Members) at Richmond, Hounslow and Battersea, and alluvium along the bed of the River Thames. The soils are generally deep loams, with seasonally wet deep clay along the banks of the River Thames from Teddington to Barnes. This attractive, meandering section of the Thames was historically a popular site for royal palaces and their associated parks. Those that remain are Hampton Court Palace, Bushy Park, Syon House and Park, Old Deer Park Gardens at Richmond and the Royal Botanic Gardens ENGLAND 100046223 2009 RESERVED ALL RIGHTS NATURAL CROWN COPYRIGHT. © OS BASE MAP 13. Upper Thames at Kew. Together they form a chain of high quality parks along the banks of the Thames. The formal parks are supplemented by a range of informal open spaces including Dukes Meadows at Chiswick, the London Wetland Centre in Barnes, Ham Common, the Ham Lands Nature Reserve and further east, Battersea Park. The sequence of open spaces is interspersed with the relatively dense historic settlements of Kingston upon Thames, Twickenham, Isleworth, Richmond upon Thames, Chiswick, Barnes, Putney, Wandsworth, Battersea, Fulham and Chelsea.
    [Show full text]
  • Welcome to Our Exhibition to Update the Community of Hounslow About
    DUKES MEADOWS MASTERPLAN Welcome to our exhibition to update the community of Hounslow about our proposals to regenerate Dukes Meadows delivering new and improved public realm and sporting facilities. The London Borough of Hounslow has appointed a team of architects and sports and leisure specialists to help develop options for the improvements and new facilities. Following the Council’s previous public exhibition, we wanted to update you on how the proposals have evolved in response to your feedback and to inform you of the proposals we are aiming to submit as part of a planning application in the coming months. The Council have been engaging with the leading stakeholders on the site during the last year to agree a mix of facilities and wider proposals for Dukes Meadows across public realm, sport, transport and access. Please take the time to fill in a feedback form and leave it with us today, or complete online at www.hounslow.gov.uk/consultations 1 DUKES MEADOWS WHAT YOU TOLD US In November 2016 the Council carried out two public consultation events to discuss our emerging proposals for improving the facilities and visitor experience at Dukes Meadows. We also launched an online public consultation to enable more people to view and comment on the proposals. Almost 300 people and stakeholders provided feedback. FEEDBACK FROM THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION Support for a riverside footbridge Increased secure car Tidy/thin trees/ Improve bandstand underneath Barnes parking options foliage/shrubbery and Promenade area Bridge Improve access Improve
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Update for CLT 28 June 2016
    CORPORATE PROPERTY STRATEGY AND ASSET MANAGEMENT PLAN 2015 - 2025 Quarterly Update for CLT 28 June 2016 1 CONTENTS 1 Executive Summary 2 Principles 3 Priorities for the Corporate Property Strategy and Asset Management Plan 4 Appendix A- Schedule of Properties 2 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This document provides a comprehensive listing of all of the Council’s operational and non- operational assets, coupled with an assessment of the ongoing Service requirement (need rather than want) for buildings and land in order to deliver services to residents and meet the aims of the Corporate Property Strategy that was adopted by the Cabinet in December 2013. An important factor in the way this exercise has been approached has been to seek to reduce the number of buildings the Council occupies in order to reduce operational costs and to create opportunities to either dispose of surplus assets or present them for redevelopment for profit. Work is underway to establish a ‘fit for purpose’ portfolio and Members should be aware that further work will be required to find the best fit of assets, either existing or to be developed, for the available budget and service needs. The Corporate Property team continues to work with service providers to identify redevelopment and disposal opportunities by matching property needs to service requirements. Flexibility and multi-use of land and buildings is central to this approach so that these assets can be much more efficient and used to their optimum potential. The strategy that flows from the key service requirements is brought together in the following Asset Management Plan This document must therefore be considered as ‘work in progress’ and by its very nature will continue to evolve over time as the nature of the Council’s business changes and responds to Central Government Policy.
    [Show full text]
  • Dukes Meadows (Alexandra Gardens, Riverside Drive, Staveley Gardens, the Promenade) Parking Restrictions
    Dukes Meadows (Alexandra Gardens, Riverside Drive, Staveley Gardens, The Promenade) parking restrictions A. The London Borough of Hounslow (Waiting and Loading Restrictions) (Amendment No. 216) Order 2018 1. The London Borough of Hounslow hereby gives Notice that on 2 July 2018 it made the above Order under Section 6 and 124 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 as amended. 2. The general effect of the Order, which comes into operation on 9 July 2018, will be to continue indefinitely the prohibition of vehicles from waiting and loading in Alexandra Gardens, Riverside Drive, Staveley Gardens and The Promenade as detailed in Schedule 1, 2 and 3 to this Notice. 3. Documents giving detailed information of the Order can be viewed for a period of 6 weeks from the date of this Notice: (a) online at www.hounslow.gov.uk by typing in the term “traffic notices” in the search bar; or (b) at the Forms and Documents Counter, Civic Centre, Lampton Road, Hounslow TW3 4DN, between 9am and 4.15pm Mondays to Fridays. Documents will be available for inspection until the end of eighteen months from the date on which this Notice is published. 4. Any person desiring to question the validity of the Order or any provision contained therein on the grounds that they are not within the relevant powers of the Road Traffic Regulation Act, or that any of the relevant regulations made thereunder have not been complied with in relation to the Order may, within six weeks of the date on which the Order was made, make an application for the purpose to the High Court.
    [Show full text]
  • Traffic & Transport Capital Schemes
    Area Forums: Key CAF: Chiswick Area Forum Complete IBAF: Isleworth & Brentford Area Forum Cancelled CHAF: Central Hounslow Area Forum On Hold HCAF: Heston & Cranford Area Forum BFHAF: Bedfont, Feltham & Hanworth Area Forum Traffic & Transport Capital Schemes - December 2020 Number of live projects: 135 Indicative Implementation Date URN Project Title Street(s) Impacted Area Forum(s) Scheme Details Status (subject to approvals & statutory utility compliance) Awaiting start date from TM-2015-LowBridge Low bridge signing N/A # All Changing all warning signs to mandatory signs Hounslow Highways Autumn 2020 Hounslow Road , Feltham New signed and marked footway parking areas (A244), Hounslow Road, Feltham (A314), Staines Road, FW-2017- (A-Roads) Footway Parking - (A-Roads) Feltham (A315) # All Feasibility Spring 2021 Conversion of archway under Kew Bridge to a RAIL-2018-KewBridgeArch Kew Bridge Arch Kew Bridge # CAF, IBAF pedestrian route Feasibility Spring 2020 A315 from borough boundary to Hounslow Town Centre/ Kew Bridge Road A205 from Kew Bridge to Chiswick Roundabout. Includes Impacts on access to Dukes Road, Dukes Avenue, Wellesley Cycle Superhighway 9 - Chiswick to Hounslow Road and Stile Hall Gardens in Informal outline design CS9-2015-CHR-HTC Town Centre Chiswick # CAF, IBAF, CHAF Cycle improvements consultation Spring 2020 Provision of cycle lanes, pedestrian improvements and CORR-2016-Bath Rd Bath road - Cycle lanes and public realm Bath Road (Rosemary Avenue other road safety interventions Awaiting start date from (Rosemary to A4)
    [Show full text]
  • Rowing on the Tideway
    ROWING ON THE TIDEWAY MIDDLESEX A chart to accompany the Code of Practice for Rowing on the Tidal Thames above Putney 2009 MIDDLESEX Hammersmith 19 17 18 21 23 22 Bridge 24 25 Kew 20 Bridge N 9 Black Lion Buoy W E River View Buoy Harbourmaster's Buoy Kew Railway Brentford Ait Buoy SURREY 4 Bridge S Hog Hole Buoy 5 10 3 Oliver's Ait Buoy 3 SURREY Tea Rose Buoy Lot's Ait Buoy 16 15 U.L. Buoy Chiswick 4 Chiswick Steps Buoy 2 Steps Crossing CZ CZ CZ Legend: LEP Buoy 16 Clubs Other hazards 11 8 Landmarks Landmarks: Aits Mile Post Buoy Bridges 1 Isleworth Ait 6 The Ship 11 The Mile Post Barker's Rails Buoy River areas Syon Reach Buoy dry at low tide CZ 2 The Pink House 7 Ye White Hart 12 Craven Cottage (FFC) 8 Jetties / Piers Syon Fairway Edges 3 Lots Ait 8 The Bandstand 13 The University Stone 6 Duke's Meadows Buoy RHR Port hand buoys Crossing NORMAL 12 4 Brentford Aits 9 Chiswick Ait Tel: 999 or 0208 312 7380 ROWING ROUTES: Barn Elms Buoy Starboard hand buoys 7 8 against either tide 5 Olivers Island 10 Harrods Repository 9 Chiswick 26 14 with the ebbtide 5 CZ Crossing Zones 27 28 13 Bridge 12 with the floodtide RHR Right Hand Rule - 10 Crossing now applies right-hand rule - 11 starboard side of river Restricted Zones whatever the tide state low water passage - Ship Inn Buoy for vessels working the Bull's Alley Buoy Tradesman's Buoy Chiswick CZ CZ Barnes slacks - use extreme caution 2 6 7 Thistleworth Marina Thames Tradesmen's Rowing Club Dove Marina Vesta Rowing Club 1 Railshead Road 11 Chiswick Boat House 21 Hammersmith Pier 31 Embankment
    [Show full text]