Toward a Christian Theology of Evolution Ameh Ejeh

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Toward a Christian Theology of Evolution Ameh Ejeh Duquesne University Duquesne Scholarship Collection Electronic Theses and Dissertations Fall 2007 Scientific volutE ion, Creation Theologies and African Cosmogonies in Dialogue: Toward a Christian Theology of Evolution Ameh Ejeh Follow this and additional works at: https://dsc.duq.edu/etd Recommended Citation Ejeh, A. (2007). Scientific vE olution, Creation Theologies and African Cosmogonies in Dialogue: Toward a Christian Theology of Evolution (Doctoral dissertation, Duquesne University). Retrieved from https://dsc.duq.edu/etd/519 This Immediate Access is brought to you for free and open access by Duquesne Scholarship Collection. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Duquesne Scholarship Collection. For more information, please contact [email protected]. SCIENTIFIC EVOLUTION, CREATION THEOLOGIES, AND AFRICAN COSMOGONIES IN DIALOGUE: TOWARD A CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY OF EVOLUTION A Dissertation Submitted to the Faculty of Theology McAnulty Graduate School of Liberal Arts Duquesne University In partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Systematic Theology By Rev. Ameh Ambrose Ejeh November 2007 Copyright by Rev. Ameh Ambrose Ejeh 2007 SCIENTIFIC EVOLUTION, CREATION THEOLOGIES, AND AFRICAN COSMOGONIES IN DIALOGUE: TOWARD A CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY OF EVOLUTION By Rev. Ameh Ambrose Ejeh Approved November 30, 2007 ______________________________________________________________ Anne M. Clifford, C. S. J., Ph.D., Dissertation Director ______________________________________________________________ Rev. Sean Kealy, C. S. Sp. First Reader ______________________________________________________________ George S. Worgul, S.T.D, Ph.D. Second Reader ______________________________________________________________ George S. Worgul, S.T.D, Ph.D. Chair, Department of Theology ______________________________________________________________ Albert Labriola, Ph.D., Acting Dean McAnulty College of Liberal Arts iii ABSTRACT SCIENTIFIC EVOLUTION, CREATION THEOLOGIES, AND AFRICAN COSMOGONIES IN DIALOGUE: TOWARD A CHRISTIAN THEOLOGY OF EVOLUTION By Rev. Ameh Ambrose Ejeh November 2007 Dissertation supervised by Anne M. Clifford, C. S. J., Ph.D. This is a dissertation in which the question of cosmic origins is examined from three perspectives, namely, Scientific Theories of Evolution, Christian Theologies of Creation, and African Cosmogonies, respectively. Through the use of comparative- dialogic and dialectic methods, and the application of the models of contact/dialogue and confirmation/integration in ways of relating science with religion, the insights of these three perspectives are examined and analyzed in the formulation of a Theology of Evolution that conceives of evolution as a medium of divine creativity. The themes of evolutionary process, interconnection, interrelation and interdependence in nature, the mystery and sacredness of nature and the teleology and destiny of creation examined in this study form the basis for a Theology of Evolution. It is an interconnection and interrelatedness that is grounded in the Trinity itself. Together we form an ongoing community of beings where all creatures have a kinship relationship iv with each other, past, present and future. The cosmos in a unity, it is all one piece, although of different layers. Humanity is the highest level of this ongoing process, nonetheless, part of a wider evolutionary process in a universe where God made “things make themselves”. Just as no creation theology today can ignore the insights of scientific evolution, so too, no other branch of theology can ignore Theology of Evolution. The implications for all theology, including African Christian theology, are crucial. This is equally evident in ecological issues where theology of Evolution has a direct ethical implication. v DEDICATION This dissertation is dedicated to my biological father and my spiritual father: My Late Father: Mr. Lawrence Onoja Ejeh and My Late Bishop Most Revd. Fidelis Ogah Orgah, D.D. vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Our elders say that the persistence and perseverance of a child in spite of apparent weaknesses and inadequacies are indications of the support system around him/her. The completion if this study program has been made possible by God’s grace and the network of support from family, friends, mentors, individuals and communities who have and continue to stand behind me on my journey through life. I am eternally grateful to you, my God, for creating me and sustaining me through it all and I thank you for all the people you have blessed me with. My sincere gratitude to my late Bishop, Most Rev. Fidelis O. Orgah, my current Bishop, Most Rev. Michael E. Apochi and my former Bishop, Most Rev. Athanasius A. Usuh for their prayers and support during this graduate study program. A million thanks to the clergy, religious and laity of the dioceses of Otukpo and Makurdi whose nurturing hands and prayerful support brought me to this day. To my professors in the Theology Department at Duquesne University, I am deeply grateful for your dedication, guidance and instructions: to the Chair of the Theology Department, Dr. George Worgul, jr., and Fr. Sean Kealy, C.S.Sp., I thank you immensely for taking time from your busy schedule to read my work and for your corrections and recommendations; and to you, my able and patient director, Dr. Anne Clifford, C.S.J., for your guidance and direction during this study program which is most highly appreciated and will forever be cherished. This is also the time to remember with gratitude my former professors at Fordham University, N.Y.; St. John’s University, N.Y.; and Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, as well as my former teachers and professors vii at Emmanuel Secondary School, Ugbokolo, Nigeria, and St. Augustine’s Major Seminary Jos, Nigeria. I owe a dept of gratitude to Jeanne and Robert Tobin for their parental guidance and support over the years. May the Good Lord see to it that you are duly rewarded. In the same way, my heart felt gratitude goes to the following families: Mary Ann and Allen Snyder; Nancy and Denis Krivinko; Carole and Gerard Werries; Mary and Chris Wilson; Janet and James Strom; Kathy and Edmund Friederick; Margaret Costa (St. Edward’s Parish Secretary); and to the Swab family especially my big sister, Trudy, as well as the many others who I cannot name here but to whom I am equally grateful. It is with immense gratitude too that I remember the Communities of Immaculate Conception Church, Tuckahoe, New York; St. Nicholas of Tolentine, Jamaica-Queens, New York; Epiphany and St. Benedict the Moore Church, Pittsburgh, P.A.; All Saints Church, Etna, P.A.; and most especially, St. Edward’s Church, Pittsburgh, P.A. for their support. To the priests of the Archdiocese of New York, the dioceses of Brooklyn, New York and Pittsburgh, especially, Rev. Msgr. Anthony Maltese, Rev, Fr. Robert McConnin, Rev. Fr. Russell Maurer, Rev. Fr. Carmen D’Amico, Fr. Tony Gargotta, Rev. Fr. Louis Vallone and Rev. Fr. James Garvey. I am grateful to you all for your care and support. With deep gratitude also I acknowledge the support and comaraderie of the Nigerian Priests and Nuns at home and abroad. These include: Rev. Msgr. Samuel Ehatikpo, Late Rev.Fr. Vincent O’Brien, C.M., Rev. Fr. Pius Itodo, Rev. Sr. Anna Abba, SON, Rev. Rev. Fr. Simeon Iber, Rev. Fr. Joseph Mali, Rev. Rev. Fr. Francis Iber, Rev. Sr. Charity Ada Peter, D.C., Rev. Fr. Hyacinth Alia, Rev. Fr. Kenneth Agede, Rev. Fr. viii Vitalis Torwel, Rev. Fr. Mathew Asemagema, Sr. BrideChristiline Ogiri, DMMM, Rev. Fr. John Wangbu, Rev. Fr. Philemon Okoh, C.M., Rev. Fr. Reginald Nwauzo, Rev. Sr. Grace Onaivi, SON, Rev. Fr. Stephen Akange, Rev. Fr. Gabriel Owoh, Rev. Fr. Marinus Iwuchukwu, Rev. Rev. Fr. Joseph Nietlong, Rev. Fr. Daniel Melaba, Rev. Sr. Josephine Okwori, D.C., Rev. Fr. Joseph Okwunjo, as well as the many others who cannot be personally named here but to whom I am no less grateful. This acknowledgment is not complete without mention of the New York Province of the Society of Jesus (Jesuits) who work in Nigeria, for their spiritual training and guidance and especially for securing my admission to Fordham University N.Y., where my graduate study program started, in particular, Rev. Fr. Peter Schineller, S.J., and Rev. Fr. William Scanlon, S.J. May the Good Lord see to it that you are all duly rewarded. ix Table of Contents Page ABSTRACT....................................................................................................................... iv DEDICATION................................................................................................................... vi ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ................................................................................................ vii ABBREVIATIONS (ACRONYMS)...............................................................................xiii PREFACE........................................................................................................................ xiv GENERAL INTRODUCTION........................................................................................... 1 The Thesis of this Study ................................................................................................. 7 Theological Relevance.................................................................................................. 11 Scope, Methodology and Feasibility............................................................................. 14 General Outline
Recommended publications
  • Vatican Observatory N E W S L E T T
    vatican observatory NEWSLETTER Spring 2012 embracing, encouraging and promoting scientific study VOF Honors Benefactors at Circles of Giving Awards Dinner DID YOU KNOW? German Jesuit Christoph Cla- vius’s viewing of the total solar eclipse of 1560 made him de- cide that astronomy would be his life's work? He went on to write numerous textbooks and Rich Friedrich and Peter Moore was the senior mathematician on Fr. DiUlio and Marianne Augustine of the Pacific Western Foundation the commission for the reform of On February 24, 2012, the Vatican Observatory Foundation honored friends and benefactors who have so the calendar in 1582. The Vatican generously supported the work of the Vatican Observatory over time. Each year as donors reach a certain Observatory Foundation rec- lifetime giving level, they achieve a Circle of Giving designation and are recognized and thanked publicly ognizes his contribution to the by the President and Board of Directors as well as their fellow benefactors and friends. Each Circle of Giv- field by welcoming benefactors of ing is named in honor of one of the exceptional individuals connected with astronomy, the Society of Jesus $10,000 to the Christoph Clavius and the Vatican Observatory. At this year’s dinner four honorees were present to receive awards from Circle of Giving. Foundation President Fr. Albert J. DiUlio, S.J., and Board Chairman, Richard J. Friedrich. They included Christoph Clavius Bill Ahmanson of The Ahmanson Foundation; Marianne Augustine; Peter Moore of the Pacific Western Foundation; and Dan Cracchiolo of The Steele Foundation, whose award was accepted by his sister, Rose Collins.
    [Show full text]
  • IDEOLOGY Second Mrican Writers' Conference Stockh01m1986
    IDEOLOGY Second Mrican Writers' Conference Stockh01m1986 Edited by with an lin"Coductory essay by Kii-sten B-olst Peitersen Per W&stbei-g Seminar Proceedings No. 28 Scandinavian Institute of African Studjes Seminar Proceedings No. 20 CRITICISM AND IDEOLOGY Second African Writers9 Conference Stockholm 1986 Edited by Kirsten Holst Petersen with an introductory essay by Per Wastberg Scandinavian Institute of African Studies, Uppsala 1988 Cover: "Nairobi City Centre", painting by Ancent Soi, Kenya, reproduced with the permission of Gunter PCus. ISSN 0281 -00 18 ISBN 91-7106-276-9 @ Nordiska afrikainstitutet, 1988 Phototypesetting by Textgruppen i Uppsala AB Printed in Sweden by Bohuslaningens Boktryckeri AB, Uddevalla 1988 Foreword The first Stockholm conference for African writers was held in 1967, at Hasselby Castle outside Stockholm, to discuss the role of the writer in mo- dern African Society, especially the relationship of his or her individuality to a wider social commitment. It was arranged on the initiative of Per Wastberg, well-known for having introduced much of African literature to the Swedish public. On Per Wastberg's initiative the Second Stockholm Conference for Afri- can Writers was arranged almost twenty years later. This time the Scandi- navian Institute of African Studies was again privileged to arrange the con- ference in cooperation with the Swedish Institute. We extend our gratitude to the Swedish Institute, the Swedish Interna- tional Development Authority (SIDA), and the Ministry for Foreign Af- fairs for generous financial support. We wish to thank our former Danish researcher Kirsten Holst Petersen for her skilful work in arranging the con- ference and editing this book.
    [Show full text]
  • Creation, Design and Evolution: Can Science Discover Or Eliminate God?
    University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy Volume 4 Issue 1 Fall 2009 Article 5 January 2009 Creation, Design and Evolution: Can Science Discover or Eliminate God? Peter M.J. Hess Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.stthomas.edu/ustjlpp Part of the First Amendment Commons, Law and Philosophy Commons, and the Religion Law Commons Recommended Citation Peter M. Hess, Creation, Design and Evolution: Can Science Discover or Eliminate God?, 4 U. ST. THOMAS J.L. & PUB. POL'Y 102 (2009). Available at: https://ir.stthomas.edu/ustjlpp/vol4/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UST Research Online and the University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy. For more information, please contact the Editor-in-Chief at [email protected]. CREATION, DESIGN AND EVOLUTION: CAN SCIENCE DISCOVER OR ELIMINATE GOD? PETER M. J. HESS, PH.D.* NATIONAL CENTER FOR SCIENCE EDUCATION "The heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament shows forth his handiwork." Psalms 19:1 INTRODUCTION: THE PLAYING OUT OF THE DESIGN ARGUMENT IN THE WEST Every culture has its views about the universe, about the human person, and about the great metaphysical questions that confront us. How ought we to think about the relationship between cosmology, anthropology, and theology? This may be a challenge for us in our increasingly secular post- modem culture, but for most of human history it was not an issue. In the Judeo-Christian tradition these areas of human reflection were naturally bound up together, as in the Hebrew psalmist's proto-statement of the argument from design: "the heavens declare the glory of God, and the firmament shows forth his handiwork."' The scholastic university culture of the High Middle Ages held as its ideal the "unity of knowledge," or unitas scientiae, approaching the study of the universe as a coherent and knowable whole.
    [Show full text]
  • The Specola Vaticana: Astronomy at the Vatican
    Organizations, People and Strategies in Astronomy 2 (OPSA 2), 217-230 Ed. A. Heck, © 2013 Venngeist. THE SPECOLA VATICANA: ASTRONOMY AT THE VATICAN GUY CONSOLMAGNO AND CHRISTOPHER CORBALLY Specola Vaticana V-00120, Vatican City State [email protected] [email protected] Abstract. The Vatican is an independent nation, with its own national astronomical observatory, the Specola Vaticana (Vatican Observatory). As- tronomy has been supported at the Vatican since the 1582 reform of the calendar; the present-day Observatory has been in operation since 1891. The work of the observatory is divided between two sites, one in the pa- pal summer gardens south of Rome, Italy, and the other affiliated with the Steward Observatory at the University of Arizona, in Tucson, Arizona, USA. Research undertaken by current staff members ranges from cosmol- ogy and the study of galactic evolution to meteoritics and meteors. Given the stable funding provided by the Vatican, the Observatory has specialized in long-term mapping and cataloguing projects that would be difficult to mount under a traditional three-year funding cycle. These have included participation in the Carte du Ciel photographic map of the sky; the at- lases of spectra produced by its Spectrochemical Laboratory; surveys of star clusters and peculiar stars; and the cataloguing of meteorite physical properties. 1. Astronomy in the Holy See Before 1891 To the Christian church, the study of creation has long been supported as an act of worshipping the Creator. Astronomy was one of the seven subjects that made up the curriculum of the medieval universities, which were themselves founded by the Church.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution Or Special Creation?
    EVOLUTION OR SPECIAL CREATION? By FRANK LEWIS MARSH, Ph. D In the great debate over the origin of this world and its inhabitants, both animal and human, many people overlook the subjective nature of the evidence used on both sides to defend positions taken. In this book the author points out that an examination of nature, either minute or vast, can never reveal, without outside information, just how the world came into existence. His sharp analysis of the problems involved will help clear the atmosphere for all who sincerely wish to arrive at a satisfactory conclusion. 1963 BY REVIEW AND HERALD REVIEW AND HERALD PUBLISHING ASSOCIATION WASHINGTON, D.C. www.AnswersInGenesis.org CONTENTS Kinds of Evidence What Do We Mean by Evolution and Special Creation? Has Natural Science Made Scripture Obsolete? Can Processes of Variation Produce New Basic Types? Completely Established Scientific Findings An Origin With Promise Creationist Internet Resources COPYRIGHT 1963 BY THE REVIEW AND HERALD PUBLISHING ASSOCIATION OFFSET IN U.S.A. KINDS OF EVIDENCE MANY honest-hearted men and women are asking the question Are we actually blood descendants of amoeba like, fishlike, reptile like, insect like, apelike types, or was our earliest ancestor formed directly from the dust, the son of God? Would Christ die to save noble beasts, or did He give His life to redeem fallen sons and daughters of Adam, children of God? This question naturally leads to another, How can we know the truth about this extremely important point? Is it a problem like that of the shape of our earth or its motions as an astronomical body? That is, Is it a problem that can be solved by applying the scientific method of investigation, where the worker employs his senses aided by specialized apparatus to secure data, and then searches for the correct answer through mathematical calculations from these data? If the problem of origin of living forms was of the same nature as that of the shape of our earth, careful scientists would have solved it long before this.
    [Show full text]
  • Creation and Evolution: What Should We Teach?
    Creation and Evolution: What Should We Teach? Author: Eugenie C. Scott, Director Affiliation: National Center for Science Education Bio: Dr. Eugenie C. Scott is Executive Director of the National Center for Science Education, Inc., a not-for-profit membership organization of scientists, teachers, and others that works to improve the teaching of evolution and of science as a way of knowing. It opposes the teaching of “scientific” creationism and other religiously based views in science classes. A former college professor, Dr. Scott lectures widely and is called upon by the press and other media to explain science and evolution to the general public. Scott is the author of the 2004 book, Evolution vs. Creationism: An Introduction, and has served as president of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists. Scott has been honored by both scientists and educators by being awarded the National Science Board Public Service Award, the AIBS Outstanding Service Award, the Geological Society of America Public Service Award, and the California Science Teachers Association Distinguished Service Award. She holds a Ph.D. in physical anthropology from the University of Missouri, an honorary D.Sc. from McGill University, and an honorary Doctor of Science from Ohio State University. Abstract: In this essay, I sketch an overview of the foundations of the creation/evolution debate in the United States today. Evolution is rejected by many Americans because it conflicts with their religious views. This conflict may occur because evolution is not compatible with biblical literalism, or because evolution creates other problems in Christian theology. Most Americans do not belong to Christian traditions that require a literal interpretation of the Bible; in addition, there is a long tradition of accommodation of evolution and science to Christian theology.
    [Show full text]
  • Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Washington University St. Louis: Open Scholarship Washington University Law Review Volume 83 Issue 1 2005 Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution Matthew J. Brauer Princeton University Barbara Forrest Southeastern Louisiana University Steven G. Gey Florida State University Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview Part of the Constitutional Law Commons, Education Law Commons, First Amendment Commons, Religion Law Commons, and the Science and Technology Law Commons Recommended Citation Matthew J. Brauer, Barbara Forrest, and Steven G. Gey, Is It Science Yet?: Intelligent Design Creationism and the Constitution, 83 WASH. U. L. Q. 1 (2005). Available at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/law_lawreview/vol83/iss1/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School at Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Washington University Law Review by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Washington University Law Quarterly VOLUME 83 NUMBER 1 2005 IS IT SCIENCE YET?: INTELLIGENT DESIGN CREATIONISM AND THE CONSTITUTION MATTHEW J. BRAUER BARBARA FORREST STEVEN G. GEY* TABLE OF CONTENTS ABSTRACT ................................................................................................... 3 INTRODUCTION..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Eugenie Scott
    Expert Witness Statement by Eugenie C. Scott Contents: 1. Qualifications as an Expert Witness 2. The Nature of Science 3. The Scientific Meaning of “Theory” and “Fact” 4. History of the Creationism/Evolution Controversy Definitions: evolution, creationism, creation science Fundamentalism; Banning Evolution Creation Science “Evidence Against Evolution” and Creation Science Evolution of Creation Science Into Intelligent Design “Theory Not Fact” Policies Are Promoted By Creationists to Denigrate Evolution and Advance Creationism 5. History of Creationism in Georgia 6. History of Creationism in Cobb County 7. “Theory Not Fact” Policies are Pedagogically Harmful Respectfully submitted: Date: November 17, 2006 _________________________ Eugenie C. Scott, Ph.D., D.Sc. 420 40th St #2 Oakland, CA 94609 1. Qualifications My name is Eugenie C. Scott. My curriculum vitae is attached to this Declaration as Exhibit A. I have a Ph.D. in physical anthropology from the University of Missouri and honorary doctorates (D.Sc.) from McGill University, Ohio State University, and Mt. Holyoke College. In December 2006, I will receive an honorary doctorate from the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, and in May 2007, from Rutgers University. I am the Executive Director of the National Center for Science Education (NCSE) in Oakland, California. NCSE is a nonprofit membership organization of scientists and others that defends the teaching of evolution in the public schools. NCSE is affiliated with the American Association for the Advancement of Science. The NCSE monitors the creationism/evolution controversy and maintains an archive of information on the recent history of the controversy, including materials relevant to the history of the creationism/evolution controversy in Cobb County.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolution: from Big Bang to Nanorobots Grinin, Leonid; Korotayev, Andrey
    www.ssoar.info Evolution: From Big Bang to Nanorobots Grinin, Leonid; Korotayev, Andrey Veröffentlichungsversion / Published Version Sammelwerk / collection Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Grinin, L., & Korotayev, A. (2015). Evolution: From Big Bang to Nanorobots. Volgograd: Uchitel Publishing House. https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-57761-1 Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Basic Digital Peer Publishing-Lizenz This document is made available under a Basic Digital Peer zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu den DiPP-Lizenzen Publishing Licence. For more Information see: finden Sie hier: http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ http://www.dipp.nrw.de/lizenzen/dppl/service/dppl/ RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES INSTITUTE OF ORIENTAL STUDIES The Eurasian Center for Big History and System Forecasting VOLGOGRAD CENTER FOR SOCIAL RESEARCH EVOLUTION From Big Bang to Nanorobots Edited by Leonid E. Grinin and Andrey V. Korotayev ‘Uchitel’ Publishing House Volgograd ББК 28.02 87.21 ‘Evolution’ Yearbook Editors Council: H. Barry III (USA), Yu. Е. Berezkin (Russia), M. L. Butovskaya (Russia), R. L. Carneiro (USA), Ch. Chase-Dunn (USA), V. V. Chernykh (Russia), H. J. M. Claessen (Netherlands), D. Christian (Australia), S. Gavrilets (USA), А. V. Dybo (Russia), K. Yu. Es'kov (Russia), I. V. Ilyin (Russia), N. N. Iordansky (Russia), P. Herrmann (Ireland), A. A. Kazankov (Russia), E. S. Kul'pin (Russia), G. G. Malinetsky (Russia), A. V. Markov (Russia), A. Yu. Militarev (Russia), M. V. Mina (Russia), V. de Munck (USA), А. P. Nazaretyan (Russia), E. B. Nay- mark (Russia), A. D. Panov (Russia), Zh. I. Reznikova (Russia), B.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution Debate George V
    Guest Editorial The Evolution Debate George V. Coyne, S.J. Vatican Observatory ow did we humans come to be in the expanding, which result in H evolving universe known through astrophysics stepwise changes and cosmology? It is quite clear that we do not know in the products everything about this process. But it would be scientifi- carried out by cally untenable to deny that the human brain is a result natural selection of a natural process of the development of ever more in the environ- complex chemistry in an evolving universe that is 13.7 ment in which billion years old and contains about 100 billion galaxies, the products each of which contains on the average about 200 billion come to exist. stars of an immense variety. After the universe became Those products rich in certain basic chemicals through the death of stars survive that can of various masses, those chemicals got together in suc- best adapt to cessive steps to make ever more complex molecules. their environ- Finally, in some extraordinary series of chemical process- ment. There is, es, the human brain came to be the most complicated therefore, an George V. Coyne machine that we know. apparent destiny Did this happen by chance or by necessity? The first toward more perfect beings, i.e., beings better able to thing to be said is that the problem is not formulated adapt in this process; but the apparent destiny can be correctly. It is not just a question of chance or necessity explained by the natural process itself. This apparent because, first of all, it is both.
    [Show full text]
  • HISTORY and ANALYSIS of the CREATION RESEARCH SOCIETY by William E
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF William E. Elliott for the degree ofMaster of Science in General Science presented on March 1, 1990. Title: History and Analysis of theCreation ltee Society Redacted for Privacy Abstractapproved: The resurgence of creationismthe past few years has been led by advocates of recent-creationism. These individuals, a minority among creationists in general, argue that the entire universe was created approximately 10,000 years ago in one six- day period of time.Recent-creationists support their position by appealing to the Genesis account of creation and scientific data. Their interpretation of Genesis is based on the doctrines of conservative, evangelical Christianity. Their interpretation of scientific data is informed by their theological presuppositions. The scientific side of recent-creationism is supported by several organizations, most of which had their origin in one group, the Creation Research Society. The CRS is a major factor in the rise of the modern creationist movement. Founded in 1963, this small (c. 2000 mem- bers) group claims to be a bona-fide scientific society engaged in valid scientific re- search conducted from a recent-creationist perspective. These claims are analyzed and evaluated. The Society's history is discussed, including antecedent creationist groups. Most of the group's founders were members of the American Scientific Affiliation, and their rejection of changes within the ASA was a significant motivating factor in founding the CRS. The organization, functioning, and finances of the Society are de- tailed with special emphasis on the group's struggles for independence and credibility. founding the CRS. The organization, functioning, and finances of the Society are de- tailed with special emphasis on the group's struggles for independence and credibility.
    [Show full text]
  • A Theology of Possessions in the African Context: a Critical Survey
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by UWC Theses and Dissertations UNIVERSITY OF THE WESTERN CAPE Thesis for MTh. Degree John Hugo Fischer Student Number: 2530178 Department of religion and theology Title of thesis A Theology of Possessions in the African context: A critical survey Supervisor: Prof. Ernst Conradie Date November 2007 1 A thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Magister Theologae in the Department of Religion and Theology at the Faculty of Arts at the University of the Western Cape By John Hugo Fischer Supervisor: Professor E. M. Conradie November 2007 2 Keywords Possessions Africa Christianity Worldviews Consumerism Private Property Communal Possessions Urbanization Stewardship Vineyard Missions 3 Abstract This thesis has been researched against the back drop of conflict that had arisen due to different approaches to possessions in the African church as practiced within the Association of Vineyard Churches. This conflict arose because of diff erent cultural approaches to possessions and property rights as they affect different parts of the African church. In order to analyse this conflict and arrive at some understanding of the different forces operating in the area of resources and possessions it was necessary to adopt the approach laid out below. The objective was to arrive at an analysis of such differences, and the sources from which such differences originated, and then to draw some conclusion with regard to the present state of the debate on possessions and how this could affect the praxis of the Vineyard churches in Sub Saharan Africa in which I serve.
    [Show full text]