Assessing the Potential Benefits of Recreational Therapy on Functioning Outcomes Samantha R
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Grand Valley State University ScholarWorks@GVSU Masters Theses Graduate Research and Creative Practice 8-10-2017 Assessing the Potential Benefits of Recreational Therapy on Functioning Outcomes Samantha R. Lamkin Grand Valley State University Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/theses Part of the Public Health Commons Recommended Citation Lamkin, Samantha R., "Assessing the Potential Benefits of Recreational Therapy on Functioning Outcomes" (2017). Masters Theses. 859. http://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/theses/859 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Research and Creative Practice at ScholarWorks@GVSU. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks@GVSU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Assessing the Potential Benefits of Recreational Therapy on Functioning Outcomes Samantha Rae Lamkin A Thesis Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of GRAND VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements For the Degree of Master of Public Health Department of Public Health August 2017 Acknowledgments I would like to extend a special thanks to all those that have aided me during the thesis process. I was privileged to be able to work with amazing committee members, Jeffrey Wing, Heather Wallace, Kelly Strutz, and Andrew Haig, who provided me with exceptional guidance and invaluable support and encouragement. I would also like to extend my gratitude to my hospital data liaison, Lisa, who committed numerous hours of voluntary data collection for this project. Without the dedication of these individuals, this thesis would not have been possible. I would also like to share a thank you to my family, specifically my parents who provided a system of support through this process. Through all the tears, frustration, and drafts, they encouraged me to keep moving forward and reminded me that all things worth doing take hard work and dedication. 3 Abstract Background: The aim of recreational therapy, like all rehabilitation therapies, is to promote the functionality and well-being of a person with disability. However, unlike other forms of therapy, recreational therapy utilizes a unique approach to rehabilitation by incorporating meaningful daily life activities into the patient’s individualized rehabilitation plan. Gains in functionality can be quantified using a Likert scale measurement Functional Independence Measures (FIM®). Previously conducted research shows a positive association between recreational therapy services and functionality gains in specific populations of persons with disability with stroke, traumatic brain injury, and spinal cord injury being most heavily represented. Problem: Research gaps exist pertaining to the association between therapy services and functionality (change between admission and discharge) in the all-cause disability population. Purpose: To determine the association between therapy services received by persons with disabilities and the magnitude of change in functionality outcomes observed in a broader population of disabled individuals. Results: A positive association between recreational therapy and functionality outcomes was observed with a 5.48 higher average improvement in overall FIM® score in patients having received recreational therapy services. Conclusions: The addition of recreational therapy to the rehabilitation standard is important in improvement of physical functionality and reduction of physical barriers for daily living. Keywords: Disability, Functionality, Therapeutic Recreation, FIM® 4 Table of Contents Abstract ............................................................................................................................... 4 I. Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 7 Introduction ......................................................................................................................... 7 Purpose ................................................................................................................................ 9 Scope ................................................................................................................................. 10 Hypothesis......................................................................................................................... 10 Significance....................................................................................................................... 10 II. Literature Review ..........................................................................................................11 Background ........................................................................................................................11 Functional Independence Measures .................................................................................. 12 Standard of Care ............................................................................................................... 14 Literature Review.............................................................................................................. 17 Problem Statement ............................................................................................................ 22 III. Methodology ............................................................................................................... 23 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 23 Participants ........................................................................................................................ 23 Data Collection ................................................................................................................. 24 Measures ........................................................................................................................... 25 Data Analysis .................................................................................................................... 27 5 Secondary Data Analyses .................................................................................................. 28 IV. Results ......................................................................................................................... 29 Demographics ................................................................................................................... 29 Regression Analysis .......................................................................................................... 29 Secondary Analysis ........................................................................................................... 30 V. Discussion ..................................................................................................................... 32 Limitations ........................................................................................................................ 36 Conclusions ....................................................................................................................... 37 Future Directions and Implications ................................................................................... 37 Appendix A ....................................................................................................................... 39 Appendix B ....................................................................................................................... 40 Appendix C ....................................................................................................................... 43 Appendix D ....................................................................................................................... 45 Appendix E ....................................................................................................................... 50 References ......................................................................................................................... 51 6 Assessing the Potential Benefits of Recreational Therapy on Functioning Outcomes I. Introduction Introduction Recreational therapy aims to rehabilitate persons with disabilities through a specialized alternative approach that focuses on psychological and physical health as a means to individual well-being (American Therapeutic Recreation Association [ATRA], 2017). The goal of recreational therapy is to enhance overall health of the rehabilitating individual, not solely the physical aspect (ATRA, 2017). Certified recreational therapists incorporate daily life activities and community and social events into treatment planning in order to focus on the elimination of barriers that might prohibit patients from participating in activities that they find meaningful. From this planning, therapy tasks can be tailored to the specific motions that would enhance the patient’s ability to participate in these meaningful life activities. Sharing similar attributes, recreational therapy and occupational therapy take similar approaches to the rehabilitation process. Early history of occupational therapy utilized everyday meaningful life activities as an approach to therapeutic rehabilitation (DeLany et al., 2010). As occupational therapy developed and evolved, occupation became the meaningful life activity that this therapy modality focused on for the rehabilitation process. The American Occupational Therapy