Quick viewing(Text Mode)

Range Considerations for RF Networks.Pdf

Range Considerations for RF Networks.Pdf

TI Technology Days 2010

Range Considerations for RF Networks

Richard Wallace Abstract

The can be one of the most daunting components of designs. Most information available relates to large antenna’s related to Amateur (HAM), Cellular Applications and expensive Whip Antennas that can never be used in a low cost application.

This session covers the basics that most engineers would need to know to predict the expected Range Distance between wireless devices and

design parameters to achieve an optimum Range Distance.

At the end of this session, the attendees should be aware of antenna requirements, the Antenna Documentation Support available and be able to select an Antenna Reference Design for their application.

Agenda

• Antenna Theory

• Antenna Measurements • Range Estimation – Friis Basic Formula

– Improved Range Estimation

– Best Accuracy Estimation

• Antenna Reference Designs – 2.4 GHz

– 2.4 GHz & 868 MHz Dual Band

– 868 / 915 / 955 MHz

– 433 / 315 / 169 MHz

– CC-Antenna-DK

• Antenna Support Documentation – Antenna Selection Quick Guide (DN035)

– Comprehensive Antenna Selection Guide (AN058)

Antenna Theory – Basic Function of an Antenna

• Transmit mode: Transform RF signals into electromagnetic waves, propagating into free space

TX • Receive mode: Transform electromagnetic waves into RF signals

RX Range

OBS: The antenna is a key component for the successful design of a wireless communication system. Antenna Theory – All Monopole Antennas are Derivatives of Dipole

AC current through *1: /2 Dipole an lags the produces the most voltage by 90 power at the ends of degrees the antenna with little power at the feedline.

Current Voltage Power /4 /4

*1 *1

All monopole antennas are derivatives of a simple dipole where one ¼ radiator is in air and one ¼ wavelength radiator is imaged into the GND and serves as the second radiator.

Antenna Theory – Wavelength Calculations in Free Space

Wavelength is dependent on frequency which is referenced to the speed of light (299 792 458 m / s): meters = 2.99792458E8 m/sec f (GHz) where GHz = 1E9

Wavelength for several frequency ranges, all units are in cm:

λ / 4 λ / 4 λ λ Frequency air FR4 air FR4

2.4 GHz 3.1 1.5 12.5 5.9 915 MHz 8.2 3.9 32.8 15.5 868 MHz 8.6 4.1 34.6 16.3 433 MHz 17.3 8.2 69.3 32.7 315 MHz 23.8 11.2 95.2 44.9 27 MHz 277.8 130.9 1111.1 523.8 Antenna Theory – Antenna Considerations

• Numerous issues to consider when selecting the antenna: – Antenna placement

– Board size available for antenna layout

– Operating frequency

plane for ¼ wavelength antennas

– Antenna mismatch (VSWR)

– Objects that alter or disrupt Line of Sight (LOS)

characteristics

– Antenna bandwidth

– Antenna Radiation Efficiency

Antenna Theory – Antenna Radiation Patterns – Traditional Coordinate System

An Isotropic Antenna is a theoretical antenna spec in dBi and radiates equally in all directions of a sphere.

Antenna Measurement Coordinate System

• x-y plane (θ = 90 deg) is the azimuth plane (horizontal plane)

• y-z plane (φ = 90 deg) is the elevation plane (vertical plane)

Antenna Theory – Antenna Radiation Patterns – 3D OTA CTIA Measurements

Example 1: 2.4 GHz Yagi (DN034)

Example 2: 868 MHz Meandering (Dual Band Option, 2.4 GHz, DN024, Rev E) Antenna Theory – Antenna Parameters

Important parameters

• WaveLength, . Antenna size for dipole relative to the c wavelength of transmission.   f • Polarization the direction of the electric field to the electromagntic wave.

• Impedance, Z. A measure of the total opposition to current flow in an alternating current circuit, made up of Z = R + iX two components, ohmic resistance and reactance, and usually represented in complex notation.

• Bandwidth is the range of frequencies where the return BW = 100 ( (FH – FL) / FC) loss is below VSWR of 2

• Efficiency () is the ratio of power in watts actually P radiated to the power into the antenna terminals   rad %100* P in Antenna Theory – Antenna Parameters

Important parameters

• Gain, G. is the maximum radiation beam of the highest beam. This parameter takes into account VSWR mismatch and energy losses.

– Important to remember that antennas do not amplify RF. Since antennas cannot create energy, the total power radiated is the same as an isotropic antenna. Any additional energy radiated in the directions it favors is offset by equally less energy radiated in all other directions.

– IEEE Gain Definition: GIEEE = Radiated Power / Delivered Power =  D

, D. Antenna directivity is usually measured in dBi, or decibels above isotropic sphere antenna. – The directional antenna has a maximum directivity greater than 0dB.

Frequency is the electrical resonance is related to the electrical length of the antenna.

Antenna Theory – Antenna Q and Bandwidth

Properly designed antenna’s should cover the range of frequencies over which the antenna can operate correctly with sufficient bandwidth.

TI defines the antenna’s bandwidth in Hertz when VSWR less than 2:1, or return loss of greater than -9.5dB

• Bandwidth (BW) can be defined in percentage of the operating frequency:

BW = 100 ( (FH – FL) / FC)

• There is a direct relationship between Q and bandwidth  ff Q  LH fc Antenna Theory – Antenna Categories

• Two fundamental types of antennas

– Single ended antennas • Usually matched to 50 ohm • Needs a if the chip has a differential output • Easy to characterize with a network analyzer

– Differential antennas • Can be matched directly to the impedance of the radio • Can be used to reduce the number of external components • Complicated to make good design • Difficult to measure the impedance and to characterize.

Antenna Theory – Resonant Antennas

• Resonant antennas are often used – Monopole: λ/4 – Bent Monopole: λ/4 – Inverted F: λ/4 – Dipole: λ/2 – Folded dipole: λ/2

Antenna Theory – Frequency “v” Size

• Lower frequency increases the range – Theoretically, reducing the frequency by a factor of two doubles the range (line of sight)

• Lower frequency requires a larger antenna – λ/4 at 433 MHz is 17.3 cm (6.77 in) – λ/4 at 915 MHz is 8.2 cm (3.22 in) – λ/4 at 2.4 GHz is 3.1 cm (1.20 in)

• A meandered structure is a compact dipole with inductive loading

- λ/4 at 2.4 GHz

feedline Antenna Theory – Max. Power Transfer (VSWR)

Moritz Von Jacobi’s maximum power theory states that maximum power transfer happens when the source resistance equals the load resistance.

As impedances are mis-matched, part of the transmitted signal is reflected back into the source which is the Voltage (VSWR); the ratio of the reflected waveform to the transmitted waveform.

With antenna design: VSWR is a measure of how well the input impedance of the antenna matches the of the output from the RF network.

Impedance mismatch will reduce performance ! Antenna Theory – - Commonly Used antennas

• Commonly used antennas – PCB antennas • No extra cost • Size demanding at sub 433 MHz • Good performance at > 868 MHz

– Whip antennas • Expensive solutions for high volume • Good performance • Hard to fit in many applications

– Chip antennas • Medium cost • Good performance at 2.4 GHz • OK performance at 868-955 MHz • Poor performance at 433-136 MHz

– Wire / Helical antennas • Low cost • Ideal at sub 433 MHz

Antenna Measurements - Done in Lab

• S-parameter measurements – Q and Bandwidth

– Matching - Mismatch

– Return Loss

• Spectrum Analyzer – Power Delivered to Antenna

– Bandwidth

– Relative Measurements of Radiated Power

• TI Tools – Receive Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) SmartRF studio

– Frequency Sweep Function (Ideal for bandwidth measurements)

Antenna Measurements - Impedance

Magnitude of mismatch in dB with respect to frequency. The smith chart shows how the impedance varies with No exact impedance can be obtained from this format. frequency. Useful tool to find the values of the antenna matching component values. VSWR circles can be used to see how well the antenna is matched. Question: The dashed red line is shown at 14dB. What is the VSWR ?

S11

S11 Antenna Measurements - Impedance - Smith Chart

Short circuit Match Open circuit

parallel L series L

Inductive parallel C series C

Capacitive Antenna Measurements -

Mismatch between the antenna and the results in losses and will reduce the radiated power from the antenna.

Inductors and in shunt and series can be used to achieve the desired impedance matching. Antenna Measurements - Characterization

How to characterize antennas:

1. Measure the reflected power at the feed point of the antenna

2. Measure the radiated power across the bandwidth of interest

3. Measure the in an Anechoic Chamber

1. 2. 3. Antenna Measurements - Anechoic Chamber

z

+ = y

x

• Patterns give directivity and gain of the antenna.

• Radiated power is also measured. • Done in an anechoic chamber to eliminate multi-paths for accurate plots. • Done through contracted 3rd party companies.

Antenna Measurements - Bandwidth

With a Spectrum Analyzer With a Network Analyzer

BWVSWR2   ff LH Antenna Measurements - Reflection

 ZZ 1   l 0 VSWR  l  ZZ 0 1 

VSWR 1 S11  log20)log(20   dB VSWR 1

VSWR S11dB Reflected Delivered

power % power %

1 -∞ 0 100

1.1 -27 0.2 99.8

1.2 -21 0.8 99.2

1.5 -14 4 96

2 -9.5 11.1 89.9

3 -6 25 75

4 -4.4 36 64

5 -3.5 44.4 55.6

5.8 -3 50 50

10 -1.7 66.9 33.1 Antenna Measurements - Mounting of Cable for S11 Measurements

Tip:

It is invaluable to have semi-rigid cables in the lab for debugging RF.

Solder first shielding onto an earth plane and then solder the 50ohm connection. Minimize risk for riping off tracks when connecting to the semi- rigid cable. Supplier: AMSKA (www.amska.se)

Ready made semi-rigid cables are A50451229, ASC047-PSMAf-0,3-200, Cable Assembly, with SMA-f and quite expensive but can be re-used 3mm stripped, 20cm again.

Antenna Measurements - Calibration Including Cable for S11 Measurements

Ideal to have dedicated boards that are specifically used just for calibration purposes. Measuring one antenna design would require four boards: • Open : end connector in air; shield connected to GND1

• Short : end connector to closest GND; shield connected to GND1 • Load: 50ohm calibration, it is • By performing these steps then useful to use two 100ohm the semi-rigid cable is also taken

parallel resistors assembled at care of during the calibration. By the end connection point; shield just using the network analyzer connected to GND1 calibration kit; then the semi-rigid cables will be a part of the • Device Under Test Board. measurements.

Antenna Measurements - Placement of Cable During S11 Measurement

Keep the cable in a constant direction and it is good practice to use cable ties to maintain cable, including network analyzer cable in a fixed position. Antenna Measurements - Use of Ferrites During S11 Measurement

Antenna Measurements - Influence of Plastic Encapsulation

• Plastic encapsulation and body effects

Antenna Measurements - Radiation Pattern - Influence

Range Estimation - Real Life Example

What Range can I expect ?

Example with CC2500 & C2591 & 7dBi Gain Antenna

Configuration: • Output Power: +21 dBm

• Input Sensitivity: -104 dBm (2.4kBaud) • LNA Gain (CC2591): 6 dB • Carrier Frequency: 2.4GHz • Antenna Gain: 7dBi

Range Estimation - Link Budget

Link Budget = Output Power + Antenna gain – Sensitivity

• Sensitivity is a negative number

• The gain of the antennas is equal to the gain of the transmitting antenna + gain of the receiving antenna

• Link budget is equal to how much loss you can have between the and receiver

With the CC2500 & C2591 & 7dBi Gain Antenna Example: • Output Power: +21 dBm

• Input Sensitivity: -104 dBm (2.4kBaud)

• LNA Gain (CC2591): 6 dB The total link budget would be 145 dB

• Carrier Frequency: 2.4GHz

• Antenna Gain: 7 dBi

Range Estimation - Friis Transmission Equation

• Predicts transmission distance based on applied and received power with no obstructions of Line of Sight.

 = Wavelength in Meters

Pr = Received Power in dBm 0.29979245 8 m/s   GHzf )(

Pt = Transmit Power in dBm

Gt = Transmit Antenna Gain in dBi

0.29979245 8 m/s GGP rtt R  Gr = Receive Antenna Gain in dBi  GHzf )(4 Pr

R = Distance between Antenna in Meters

Using our example case, according to the Friis Equation the distance would be approx 155 km ! Correct ?

Range Estimation - Predicting Range with an Improved Estimation

Transmit antenna GT Direct transmission Receive antenna

GR

H 1 Reflected transmission H2 Θ Θ i r εr d Reflection law 

Θi=Θr

Take into account the height distance to earth (H1 & H2).

The closer to earth, the shorter the range (H1 & H2 -> 0).

For further information, please refer to DN018

Using our example case, with H1 & H2 at 1.3m; the distance would be approx 9 km.

Range Estimation - Predicting Range with the Highest Accuracy

If even higher accuracy is required, then measure the actual Transmitted Radiated Power in a chamber and re-enter the measured values into the ground model formula.

Using our example case, with H1 at 4700m (Pike’s Peak, Colorado USA) & H2 at 1.3m; the distance would be approx 90 km. Measured at least 65 km +

The main point is to take into account the height above ground for the transmitter antenna (H1) and receiver antenna (H2) whilst calculating the expected range since this will strongly effect the range. 2.4 GHz Reference Designs – Single Ended Antennas

AN048

AN043 DN007 DN034 2.4 GHz Reference Designs – Folded Dipole Antennas

AN040 DN004 2.4 GHz & 868 MHz Reference Design – Dual Band Antennas

Efficiency: 868 MHz : 91 % 2.4 GHz : 87 %

DN024 (Rev:E) 868 / 915 / 955 MHz Reference Designs – Single Ended Antennas

DN024 DN023 DN031 DN031

DN031 DN031 DN016 DN033 433 / 315 / 169 MHz Reference Designs – Single Ended Antennas

DN031 DN031 DN031 DN031 DN031 Reference Designs – CC-Antenna-DK

DN031 Antenna Support Documentation – Antenna Selection Quick Guide

DN035 Antenna Support Documentation – Comprehensive Antenna Selection Guide

AN058 Thank you for your attention.

Questions?