Submission to NSW Independent Bushfire Inquiry Dailan Pugh, for North East Forest Alliance, April 2020

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Submission to NSW Independent Bushfire Inquiry Dailan Pugh, for North East Forest Alliance, April 2020 NEFA Submission to NSW Bushfire Inquiry Submission to NSW Independent Bushfire Inquiry Dailan Pugh, for North East Forest Alliance, April 2020 Six months later: Much of the heavily burnt stands in Ellangowan State Forest are not going to recover, 1 NEFA Submission to NSW Bushfire Inquiry Consideration against the NSW Independent Bushfire Inquiry's terms of reference: 1. The causes of, and factors contributing to, the frequency, intensity, timing and location of, bushfires in NSW in the 2019- 20 bushfire season, including consideration of any role of weather, drought, climate change, fuel loads and human activity. 6. [to make recommendations on] hazard reduction, zoning, and any appropriate use of indigenous practices. 2019 was Australia’s hottest, driest year on record and 2018-2019 was southeast Australia's driest two-year period on record. It is apparent the principle exasperating factors affecting the severity and extent of the 2019-20 bushfires in north-east NSW were the record drought and temperatures in the preceding months. There can be no doubt the extent and severity of the fires were due to climate heating. Though there are numerous underlying factors contributing to the dryness, structure, and composition of the vegetation, and thus the nature and extent of the fires. Fire initiated by lightning has been a factor driving evolution and adaptation of Australian biota for millions of years, long before people arrived. There can be no doubt that people, and their use of fire for a variety of purposes, changed the extent and frequency of fire in parts of the landscape, and thus contributed to subsequent environmental changes. What is not clear is the significance of these contributions. It appears that people first arrived on the Australian continent around 50,000 years ago. The first people used landscape fire to clear passageways, aid hunting, create green pick to concentrate prey and promote growth of food plants. It is apparent that their use of fire would have been tailored to regional and ecosystem differences, and specific management goals, as well as having to adapt between years and over time to changing climates. Within a few thousand years of arrival, Aboriginal burning regimes in Monsoon forests may have facilitated a decline in rainforests, expansion of grassy woodlands, the elimination of the megafauna, and increasing aridity as the Monsoon rainfalls retreated from central Australia. Human induced changes in fire regimes due to 'firestick farming' have been attributed by some as a principal causative factor of the changes, though equally the changes have been attributed to climate changes. The conclusion from long term charcoal and pollen analyses up until European arrival, is that the dominant influence on fire since Aboriginal settlement has been the variable climate, as vegetation and fire events apparently varied primarily in response to climate regardless of human presence (see Section 1). The evidence reviewed herein indicates that before the European invasion the wetter forests of north-east NSW are likely to have had fire regimes measured in centuries, and for drier forests one 2 NEFA Submission to NSW Bushfire Inquiry measured in multiple decades. There were evidently long fire-free periods. It appears that some areas may have had significantly increased fire frequencies due to Aboriginal burning (at least over the past 5,000 years), though these were likely discrete areas. (see Section 1.1.) What is apparent from charcoal records across Australia is that the frequency of fire increased dramatically with settlement by Europeans, before declining slightly more recently since the adoption of fire suppression policies. (see Section 1.1.) Many of the proponents for increased burning who cite Aboriginal 'firestick' farming don't seem to be advocating replicating the burning regimes actually practiced, with all the nuances about seasons, patch size, frequency, exclusions etc (i.e. Bird et. al. 2008), but rather a free-for-all where people can burn at will. People who are advocating a return to the good old days are primarily calling for a return of the record European burning of a few decades ago, not to the Aboriginal burning regimes of hundreds or thousands of years ago. Frequent patch burning is being advocated as the traditional Aboriginal cultural burning regime for east coast forests, despite the lack of evidence that Aborigines applied a frequent burning regime in north-east NSW (Sections 1 and 1.1.). The importation of Aboriginal burning regimes from Monsoon woodlands on Cape York to temperate forests in NSW without recognition that they are very different environments and ecosystems with very different fire histories cannot be considered 'culturally' appropriate. If we want to emulate the burning that occurred in north-east NSW during pre-European times then we need to retain most forests free of fire for decades or centuries. This is considered a worthwhile goal, though regrettably it is likely unattainable in many areas due to human demands, the degraded nature of the vegetation, the drying of regional climates due to land clearing and the increasing frequency of extreme climatic events due to climate heating. Never-the-less a return to natural fire frequencies should be pursued where possible through both fire suppression in remote areas and allowing occasional wildfires to run their course. The evidence is that frequent landscape burning is a relatively recent cultural construct of European invaders in north-east NSW's forests, particularly to facilitate cattle grazing, there is no evidence it was a cultural practice of Aboriginal people before then. Changes to forest's flammability since European settlement have been profound. What is most apparent is that the extent, structure and species composition of forests have been dramatically altered. Large areas of forests and woodlands have been cleared, while increased burning, logging and stock grazing have significantly altered forest's species composition, structure and microclimates. Introduced grasses and weeds (notably lantana) provide novel fuel sources. It is a very different environment and climate from what existed 230 years ago and fire behaves differently in this altered landscape. Changes initiated by human activity since European invasion include: 1. Displacement of Aboriginal fire management by European fire regimes, resulting in dramatic increases in the frequency and intensities of fires, thereby altering the nature and structure of vegetation, and increasing its flammability (see Section 1.1.). 2. Extensive land clearing resulting in fragmented forests, and regional increases in temperatures and reduced rainfall, thereby amplifying climatic extremes and increasing landscape flammability (see Section 5.1.) . 3 NEFA Submission to NSW Bushfire Inquiry 3. Altering forest structure through logging, by removing most older trees, while increasing younger age classes with more contiguous canopies, increasing transpiration and water demand, along with flammability (see Section 2). 4. Livestock increasing and changing grazing pressure, changing the structure and species composition of forest understories, eating tree seedlings, compacting soils, promoting weeds, degrading wetlands and eroding stream banks, thereby affecting vegetation structure and flammability (see Section 3). 5. Introduction of exotic grasses and weeds that have changed the structure and flammability of vegetation (see Section 3.4, 4.2.2.) Clearing has significantly altered the climate by reducing evapotranspiration and surface roughness, thereby reducing regional rainfalls and increasing temperatures. These changes are being compounded by climate heating which is increasing temperatures and intensifying droughts. The result of these impacts is a significant increase in the frequency and longevity of extreme fire weather. Whatever the fire regime was 230 years ago, it is unlikely to be appropriate or successful in current forests with such wide expanses significantly altered by recent use and a heating climate. A high priority has to be to stop degrading forests and restore their natural resilience to burning. An over- riding intent has to maintain viable populations of the numerous species whose populations have been decimated by the consequences of past land management. Since European settlement people have built permanent houses and infrastructure throughout forested landscapes, changing the emphasis of burning to protecting widely dispersed and expensive assets. It is recognised that frequent control, fuel reduction and/or patch burning are necessary tools for fire management in our changing world, though they have to be applied judiciously to maximise direct protection of assets while minimising environmental impacts. Relevant recommendations: R1.1., R1.2., R1.3., R2.1., R3.1. 2. The preparation and planning... for bushfires in NSW, including current laws, practices and strategies ... 5 [to make recommendations on] Preparation and planning for future bushfire threats and risks. 7. [to make recommendations on] Appropriate action to adapt to future bushfire risks to communities and ecosystems. Due to climate heating bushfires are becoming more frequent and intense. As evidenced in 2019- 20, droughts and heatwaves are drying forests out and making them more flammable. The fires were of unprecedented extent burning through 2.4 million hectares of north-east NSW, and unprecedented intensity as evidenced by the burning of 35% of rainforest. The situation is dire
Recommended publications
  • Flora.Sa.Gov.Au/Jabg
    JOURNAL of the ADELAIDE BOTANIC GARDENS AN OPEN ACCESS JOURNAL FOR AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY flora.sa.gov.au/jabg Published by the STATE HERBARIUM OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA on behalf of the BOARD OF THE BOTANIC GARDENS AND STATE HERBARIUM © Board of the Botanic Gardens and State Herbarium, Adelaide, South Australia © Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Government of South Australia All rights reserved State Herbarium of South Australia PO Box 2732 Kent Town SA 5071 Australia © 2012 Board of the Botanic Gardens & State Herbarium, Government of South Australia J. Adelaide Bot. Gard. 25 (2012) 71–96 © 2012 Department of Environment, Water and Natural Resources, Govt of South Australia Notes on Hibbertia (Dilleniaceae) 8. Seven new species, a new combination and four new subspecies from subgen. Hemistemma, mainly from the central coast of New South Wales H.R. Toelkena & R.T. Millerb a State Herbarium of South Australia, DENR Science Resource Centre, P.O. Box 2732, Kent Town, South Australia 5071 E-mail: [email protected] b 13 Park Road, Bulli, New South Wales 2516 E-mail: [email protected] Abstract Increased collections from the Hibbertia-rich vicinity of Sydney, New South Wales, prompted a survey of rarer species to publicise the need for more information ahead of the rapid urban spread. Many of these species were previously misunderstood or are listed as rare and endangered. Thirteen new taxa (in bold) are described and discussed in context with the following seventeen taxa within seven different species groups: 1. H. acicularis group: H. woronorana Toelken; 2. H. humifusa group: H.
    [Show full text]
  • Expert Witness Report
    Expert Witness Report Report prepared on instructions of: Bleyer Lawyers, Level 1, 550 Lonsdale Street, Melbourne, Vic 3000 Australia Prepared by: Graeme Gillespie B.Sc. Ph.D. 55 Union Street, Northcote, Vic 3070, Australia Curriculum Vitae Attached (Appendix I) I have read the Expert Witness Code of Conduct and agree to be bound by it. Graeme Gillespie 23 February 2010 Qualifications and Experience Please see my curriculum vitae (Appendix I) for my general qualifications and experience. My Ph.D. in zoology focussed specifically on the conservation biology and ecology of frog species in south-eastern Australia. I have 23 years of field and scientific experience studying amphibians and their conservation and management in south- eastern Australia. I have published 24 refereed scientific papers and 38 technical reports on amphibian ecology, conservation and management. I am recognised throughout Australia as an authority on the frog fauna of Victoria, specifically with respect to conservation issues, and I am regularly asked to provide advice on such matters to individuals, government conservation and land management agencies, and non-government organisations. With regard to the Giant Burrowing Frog, I encountered this species on several occasions between 1986 and 1992 while undertaking and supervising pre-logging biodiversity surveys in East Gippsland, Victoria. These records are documented in the Victorian Wildlife Atlas. During this period, I gained knowledge of the species’ habitat associations, breeding biology, some aspects of its behaviour and an appreciation of its conservation status in Victoria (see Opie et al. 1990; Westaway et al.1990; Lobert et al. 1991). Because of my research into amphibian conservation and management, I am highly familiar with the existing literature on the impact of various forest management activities on amphibians and the implications of these activities for amphibian conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Glacidorbidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Heterobranchia) of Australia
    © Copyright Australian Museum, 2000 Records of the Australian Museum (2000) Vol. 52: 307–353. ISSN 0067-1975 The Glacidorbidae (Mollusca: Gastropoda: Heterobranchia) of Australia W.F. PONDER AND G.J. AVERN Centre for Evolutionary Research, Australian Museum, 6 College Street, Sydney NSW 2010, Australia [email protected] ABSTRACT. The heterobranch gastropod family Glacidorbidae (?Pulmonata) is known only from temperate Australia and Chile. The Australian taxa are reviewed and three new genera, Benthodorbis, Striadorbis and Tasmodorbis are described based on differences in their shells, especially the protoconchs, and in their opercula and radulae. Nineteen species of Australian glacidorbids are recognised, all but four of them new. Of the four Australian species previously included in Glacidorbis, only two, G. hedleyi (Iredale) from New South Wales and Victoria, and G. occidentalis Bunn & Stoddart from south Western Australia, are retained in that genus. Eleven new species of Glacidorbis are described, seven from Tasmania (G. bicarinatus, G. catomus, G. atrophus, G. decoratus, G. costatus, G. tasmanicus and G. circulus), one (G. isolatus) from New South Wales, two (G. otwayensis and G. rusticus) from Victoria and one (G. troglodytes) from South Australia. Striadorbis contains the Tasmanian S. pedderi (Smith), and two new species, S. spiralis from western Victoria and S. janetae from Tasmania. Benthodorbis contains two species, both from old lakes in Tasmania; B. pawpela (Smith) from Great Lake and B. fultoni from Lake Sorell. Tasmodorbis contains a single species found in western Tasmania, T. punctatus, unique in having internal shell pores. Glacidorbis costatus is known only from Pulbeena Swamp in NW Tasmania and appears to be recently extinct, possibly as a result of draining of the swamp in the early part of this century.
    [Show full text]
  • Post-Fire Impact Assessment for Priority Frogs: Northern Philoria
    Post-fire impact assessment for priority frogs: northern Philoria Geoffrey Heard, Liam Bolitho, David Newell, Harry Hines, Hunter McCall, Jill Smith and Ben Scheele July 2021 Cite this publication as: Heard, G., Bolitho, L., Newell, D., Hines, H., McCall, H., Smith, J., and Scheele, B., 2021. Post-fire impact assessment for priority frogs: northern Philoria. NESP Threatened Species Recovery Hub Project 8.1.3 report, Brisbane. Main cover image: Philoria habitat. Image: Liam Bolitho. Insert images (from top to bottom): Philoria kundagungan. Image: Harry Hines; Philoria richmondensis. Image: David Newell; Philoria loveridgei. Image: Harry Hines. 2 Contents Executive Summary ............................................................................................................................................................................................................4 Introduction ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 Background .................................................................................................................................................................................................................6 Study species .............................................................................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Abandoned Australia’S Forest Wildlife in Crisis
    Abandoned Australia’s forest wildlife in crisis Photo: Endangered Spotted-tailed Quoll by award-winning nature photographer David Gallan. Used with permission. ​ ​ ​ March 2019 (Updated July 2019) Contents Part 1: A sample of threatened forest-dwelling fauna species at risk from logging 3 ​ Comparison between ‘RFA forests’ and habitat for critically endangered species 5 Regent Honeyeater (NSW) 6 Western Ringtail Possum (WA) 7 Swift Parrot (NSW/Tas/Vic) 8 Leadbeater’s Possum (Vic) 9 Barred Galaxias (Vic) 10 ​ ​ Giant Freshwater Crayfish (Tas) 11 ​ ​ Koala (NSW/Vic) 12 ​ ​ Forest Red-tailed Black Cockatoo (WA) 13 ​ ​ Giant Barred Frog (NSW) 14 ​ ​ Numbat (WA) 15 ​ ​ Spotted-tailed Quoll (NSW/Vic) 16 Greater Glider (NSW/Vic) 17 ​ ​ Large Forest Owls: Masked Owl, Sooty Owl, Powerful Owl (NSW/Tas/Vic) 18 Further threatened forest-dwelling, logging-impacted species 20 ​ Part 2: Summary of new laws and proposals for new protected areas 25 ​ Part 3: Case studies: Threatened species under new RFAs and accredited logging plans 29 ​ 3.1 NSW ‘Integrated Forestry Operations Approvals’ (IFOAs) 30 ​ 3.2 Victoria: State of the Forests Report documents species decline 31 3.3 Tasmania 31 Part 4: Relevant court cases and rulings and their implications 32 ​ 4.1 Enforcement of EPBC Act in relation to threatened species 33 ​ ​ ​ ​ ​ Appendix 1: The total number of EPBC-listed, forest-dwelling species in Australia 34 ​ ​ ​ Appendix 2: Key threatening processes 35 ​ ​ Appendix 3: FSC HCV categories 37 ​ Acknowledgements and selected references 38 The Wilderness Society acknowledges the First Nations peoples of the lands and seas on which we work across Australia, and recognises their continuing connection to land, water and community.
    [Show full text]
  • National Recovery Plan for the Stuttering Frog Mixophyes Balbus
    National Recovery Plan for the Stuttering Frog Mixophyes balbus David Hunter and Graeme Gillespie Prepared by David Hunter and Graeme Gillespie (Department of Sustainability and Environment, Victoria). Published by the Victorian Government Department of Sustainability and Environment (DSE) Melbourne, October 2011. © State of Victoria Department of Sustainability and Environment 2010 This publication is copyright. No part may be reproduced by any process except in accordance with the provisions of the Copyright Act 1968. Authorised by the Victorian Government, 8 Nicholson Street, East Melbourne. ISBN 978-1-74242-369-2 (online) This is a Recovery Plan prepared under the Commonwealth Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999, with the assistance of funding provided by the Australian Government. This Recovery Plan has been developed with the involvement and cooperation of a range of stakeholders, but individual stakeholders have not necessarily committed to undertaking specific actions. The attainment of objectives and the provision of funds may be subject to budgetary and other constraints affecting the parties involved. Proposed actions may be subject to modification over the life of the plan due to changes in knowledge. Disclaimer: This publication may be of assistance to you but the State of Victoria and its employees do not guarantee that the publication is without flaw of any kind or is wholly appropriate for your particular purposes and therefore disclaims all liability for any error, loss or other consequence that may arise from you relying on any information in this publication. An electronic version of this document is available on the Department of the Environment, Water, Heritage and the Arts website www.environment.gov.au For more information contact the DSE Customer Service Centre 136 186 Citation: Hunter, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Extension of Warkworth Coal Mine Environmental Impact Statement
    Extension of Warkworth Coal Mine environmental impact statement impact environmental Extension of Warkworth Coal Mine environmental impact statement 1 August 2002 Extension of Warkworth Coal Mine Prepared by Environmental Resources Management Australia Pty Ltd Building C, 33 Saunders Street, Pyrmont Environmental Impact Statement New South Wales 2009 Australia for Locked Bag 24 Broadway New South Wales 2007 Australia Coal & Allied on behalf of Warkworth Mining Limited Telephone 02 8584 8888 Facsimile 02 8584 8800 Web www.erm.com August 2002 ISBN 1-875673-03-2 1 Prepared by: Karl Rosen Extension of Warkworth Coal Mine Position: Project Coordinator Signed: Date: 30 August, 2002 Coal & Allied on Behalf of Warkworth Mining Limited Prepared by: Brett McLennan Position: Project Manager Signed: August 2002 Date: 30 August, 2002 Approved by: David Snashall Position: Project Director Signed: Date: 30 August, 2002 Environmental Resources Management Australia Pty Ltd Quality System 8020044RP1 This report was prepared in accordance with the scope of services set out in the contract between Environmental Resources Management Australia Pty Ltd ABN 12 002 773 248 (ERM) and the Client. To the best of our knowledge, the proposal presented herein accurately reflects the Client’s intentions when the report was printed. However, the application of conditions of approval or impacts of unanticipated future events could modify the outcomes described in this document. In preparing the report, ERM used data, surveys, analyses, designs, plans and other information
    [Show full text]
  • The Vegetation of Granitic Outcrop Communities on the New England Batholith of Eastern Australia
    547 The vegetation of granitic outcrop communities on the New England Batholith of eastern Australia John T. Hunter and Peter J. Clarke Hunter, John T. and Clarke, Peter J. (Division of Botany, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2350) 1998. The vegetation of granitic outcrop communities on the New England Batholith of eastern Australia. Cunninghamia 5 (3): 547–618. The vegetation of 22 areas of granitic outcrops on the New England Batholith has been surveyed using semi-quantitative quadrat sampling. In total 399 0.1 ha quadrats were placed on 216 outcrops. Twenty-eight plant communities in nine major groups and an additional unsurveyed community are circumscribed. A high number of nationally rare or threatened taxa, many of which are restricted to outcrop areas, have been found in these communities along with many taxa of special note. Previous studies have over-emphasised structure which can vary considerably with negligible floristic change. Suggestions are made on potential areas for reservation. Introduction Studies concentrating on the vegetation of granitic outcrops have been undertaken throughout the world (e.g. Whitehouse 1933; Oosting & Anderson 1937; McVaugh 1943; Keever et al. 1951; Keever 1957; Hambler 1964; Murdy et al. 1970; Sharitz & McCormick 1973; Rundel 1975; Shure & Fagsdale 1977; Wyatt 1977; Phillips 1981; Phillips 1982; Wyatt 1981; Baskin & Baskin 1982; Walters 1982; Burbanck & Phillips 1983; Wyatt 1984a, b; Uno & Collins 1987; Baskin & Baskin 1988; Houle & Phillips 1988; Houle & Phillips 1989a, b; Houle 1990; Porembski et al. 1994; Ibisch et al. 1995; Porembski 1995; Porembski et al. 1996). Research into outcrops, and in particular granitic outcrops, has culminated in the formation of the ‘Inselberg-Projeckt’ supported by the Deutsche Forschungsge-meinschaft (Porembski et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Status of Populations of Threatened Stream Frog Species in the Upper Catchment of the Styx River on the New England Tablelands, Near Sites Where Trout Releases Occur
    Status of populations of threatened stream frog species in the upper catchment of the Styx River on the New England Tablelands, near sites where trout releases occur. Year 3: continuation of established transect monitoring for the study of trout impacts in endangered frog demographics. Simon Clulow, John Clulow & Michael Mahony School of Environmental and Life Sciences, University of Newcastle Prepared For Recreational Freshwater Fishing Trust New South Wales Department of Primary Industries October 2009 i Executive Summary The authors of this report were engaged to assess the status of populations of threatened stream frogs in and around the upper catchment of the Styx River on the New England Tablelands in areas where trout releases occur over the spring/summer periods of 2007/2008 and 2008/2009. The brief for this study required an assessment of the impact of introduced trout on these threatened frog populations in streams where trout have been released. The rationale for this study was the implication of trout in the decline of several Australian specialist stream breeding amphibian species in 1999 (Gillespie & Hero, 1999). Initial surveys of the region 2006 involved broad landscape scale surveys of the presence/absence of a number of threatened species that were known to be present in the New England Tablelands historically. In 2007 and 2008, the studies were focussed on a smaller number of permanent transects that were established at 11 sites in the Styx River area to investigate more intensely potential impacts of trout on two endangered frogs: the Glandular Frog, Litoria subglandulosa and the Stuttering Frog, Mixophyes balbus.
    [Show full text]
  • ARAZPA Amphibian Action Plan
    Appendix 1 to Murray, K., Skerratt, L., Marantelli, G., Berger, L., Hunter, D., Mahony, M. and Hines, H. 2011. Guidelines for minimising disease risks associated with captive breeding, raising and restocking programs for Australian frogs. A report for the Australian Government Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities. ARAZPA Amphibian Action Plan Compiled by: Graeme Gillespie, Director Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria; Russel Traher, Amphibian TAG Convenor, Curator Healesville Sanctuary Chris Banks, Wildlife Conservation and Science, Zoos Victoria. February 2007 1 1. Background Amphibian species across the world have declined at an alarming rate in recent decades. According to the IUCN at least 122 species have gone extinct since 1980 and nearly one third of the world’s near 6,000 amphibian species are classified as threatened with extinction, placing the entire class at the core of the current biodiversity crisis (IUCN, 2006). Australasia too has experienced significant declines; several Australian species are considered extinct and nearly 25% of the remainder are threatened with extinction, while all four species native to New Zealand are threatened. Conventional causes of biodiversity loss, habitat destruction and invasive species, are playing a major role in these declines. However, emergent disease and climate change are strongly implicated in many declines and extinctions. These factors are now acting globally, rapidly and, most disturbingly, in protected and near pristine areas. Whilst habitat conservation and mitigation of threats in situ are essential, for many taxa the requirement for some sort of ex situ intervention is mounting. In response to this crisis there have been a series of meetings organised by the IUCN (World Conservation Union), WAZA (World Association of Zoos & Aquariums) and CBSG (Conservation Breeding Specialist Group, of the IUCN Species Survival Commission) around the world to discuss how the zoo community can and should respond.
    [Show full text]
  • Mummel Gulf National Park and State Conservation Area Draft Plan of Management
    MUMMEL GULF NATIONAL PARK AND STATE CONSERVATION AREA DRAFT PLAN OF MANAGEMENT NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service Part of the Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water January, 2010 Acknowledgements The NPWS acknowledges that these reserves are in the traditional country of the Biripai, Anaiwan and Thungutti/Dunghutti Aboriginal people. This plan of management was prepared by staff of the Northern Tablelands Region of the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service (NPWS), part of the Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water. Valuable information and comments were provided by NPWS specialists, the Regional Advisory Committee and members of the public. For additional information or any inquiries about this park or this plan of management, contact the NPWS Walcha Area Office, 188W North Street Walcha or by telephone on 02 6777 4700. Disclaimer: This publication is for discussion and comment only. Publication indicates the proposals are under consideration and are open for public discussion. Any statements made in this draft publication are made in good faith and do not render the NPWS liable for any loss or damage. Provisions in the final management plan may not be the same as those in this draft plan. © Department of Environment, Climate Change and Water NSW, 2010: Use permitted with appropriate acknowledgment. ISBN 978 1 74232 512 5 DECCW 2010/29 INVITATION TO COMMENT The National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 (NPW Act) requires that a plan of management be prepared that outlines how an area will be managed by the
    [Show full text]
  • Review of State Conservation Areas
    Review of State Conservation Areas Report of the first five-year review of State Conservation Areas under the National Parks and Wildlife Act 1974 November 2008 Cover photos (clockwise from left): Trial Bay Goal, Arakoon SCA (DECC); Glenrock SCA (B. Peters, DECC); Banksia, Bent Basin SCA (M. Lauder, DECC); Glenrock SCA (B. Peters, DECC). © Copyright State of NSW and Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW. The Department of Environment and Climate Change NSW and State of NSW are pleased to allow this material to be reproduced for educational or non-commercial purposes in whole or in part, provided the meaning is unchanged and its source, publisher and authorship are acknowledged. Specific permission is required for the reproduction of photographs. Published by: Department of Environment and Climate Change 59–61 Goulburn Street PO Box A290 Sydney South 1232 Ph: (02) 9995 5000 (switchboard) Ph: 131 555 (environment information and publications requests) Ph: 1300 361 967 (national parks information and publications requests) Fax: (02) 9995 5999 TTY: (02) 9211 4723 Email: [email protected] Website: www.environment.nsw.gov.au ISBN 978-1-74122-981-3 DECC 2008/516 November 2008 Printed on recycled paper Contents Minister’s Foreword iii Part 1 – State Conservations Areas 1 State Conservation Areas 4 Exploration and mining in NSW 6 History and current trends 6 Titles 7 Assessments 7 Compliance and rehabilitation 8 Renewals 8 Exploration and mining in State Conservation Areas 9 The five-year review 10 Purpose of the review 10
    [Show full text]