DOCSLIB.ORG

Interferon Regulatory Factors (IRF) 1 and 8 in the Context of Pathogen Challenge by Chip on Chip and Genome Wide Transcription Profiling

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Interferon Regulatory Factors (IRF) 1 and 8 in the Context of Pathogen Challenge by Chip on Chip and Genome Wide Transcription Profiling The identification of transcriptional targets of Interferon Regulatory Factors (IRF) 1 and 8 in the context of pathogen challenge by ChIP on Chip and genome wide transcription profiling Oxana Kapoustina August 2009 A thesis submitted for the fulfillment of the Master of Science degree, Dept. of Biochemistry Library and Archives Bibliothèque et Canada Archives Canada Published Heritage Direction du Branch Patrimoine de l’édition 395 Wellington Street 395, rue Wellington Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Ottawa ON K1A 0N4 Canada Canada Your file Votre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-66143-7 Our file Notre référence ISBN: 978-0-494-66143-7 NOTICE: AVIS: The author has granted a non- L’auteur a accordé une licence non exclusive exclusive license allowing Library and permettant à la Bibliothèque et Archives Archives Canada to reproduce, Canada de reproduire, publier, archiver, publish, archive, preserve, conserve, sauvegarder, conserver, transmettre au public communicate to the public by par télécommunication ou par l’Internet, prêter, telecommunication or on the Internet, distribuer et vendre des thèses partout dans le loan, distribute and sell theses monde, à des fins commerciales ou autres, sur worldwide, for commercial or non- support microforme, papier, électronique et/ou commercial purposes, in microform, autres formats. paper, electronic and/or any other formats. The author retains copyright L’auteur conserve la propriété du droit d’auteur ownership and moral rights in this et des droits moraux qui protège cette thèse. Ni thesis. Neither the thesis nor la thèse ni des extraits substantiels de celle-ci substantial extracts from it may be ne doivent être imprimés ou autrement printed or otherwise reproduced reproduits sans son autorisation. without the author’s permission. In compliance with the Canadian Conformément à la loi canadienne sur la Privacy Act some supporting forms protection de la vie privée, quelques may have been removed from this formulaires secondaires ont été enlevés de thesis. cette thèse. While these forms may be included Bien que ces formulaires aient inclus dans in the document page count, their la pagination, il n’y aura aucun contenu removal does not represent any loss manquant. of content from the thesis. Acknowledgments: I sincerely thank Dr. Philippe Gros for giving me the opportunity to complete my degree in his laboratory and for providing support and advice. Thank you Gundula and Joanne for showing me the ropes (in the lab and outside) and your friendship. I would like to extend my thanks to Susan and Norm for keeping our lab running smoothly, Michel for always having advice and the right solutions, Anne for showing me how to work in TC, the rest of the ladies in the Gros lab, Charles and JF. Abstract: Interferon regulatory factors (IRFs) is a family of transcriptional regulators that are essential for cell differentiation and growth, oncogenesis and the regulation of immunity. IRF1 and IRF8 play a crucial role in immunity by regulating the differentiation of the cells of myeloid lineage, particularly the development of immune cells including macrophages, NK and dendritic cells. Both transcription factors are essential for the resistance to viral and bacterial infections. We optimized the chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) technique to be used with IRF8 and IRF1 antibodies in a J774 line stimulated with IFNγ/CpG. Using ChIP coupled to an exon promoter 244K microarray (ChIP on Chip) we identified 201 and 303 binding sites of high confidence for IRF1 and IRF8 respectively. Previously known IRF1 and IRF8 transcription targets (OAS1b for IRF1 and IFNb for IRF8) as well as novel transcriptional control loci were identified. One of the major gene ontology (GO) functional categories in the two gene lists was “immune response”. The overlap of IRF1 and IRF8 transcription target genes from ChIP on Chip revealed an overlap of 19 genes most of which belonged to the “immune regulation” GO pathway and included targets of high confidence: Gbp6, Mx2, Tnfsf13b, H2-T24, and Ifit1. A parallel microarray transcription profiling study on mouse bone marrow macrophages (BMDMs) from an F2 generation of Balb/C IRF8-wildtype and BXH2 IRF8-mutant cross was performed. The BMDMs possessing the wildtype and the mutant IRF8 alleles were infected with Legionella pneumophila or stimulated with IFNγ/CpG to identify genes regulated by IRF8 in the context of infection. 1171 and 852 differentially regulated genes were differentially regulated in the infection and stimulation experiments respectively. Genes that displayed interaction between IRF8 allele and the infection conditions were isolated to yield high confidence gene lists of 31 and 129 genes for the Legionella and IFNγ/CpG experiments respectively. The overlap of the two gene lists revealed 7 genes in common, two of which belong to the JAK-STAT signalling pathway (IL10 and Ccd1). The comparison of the IFNγ/CpG microarray experiment gene list with the gene list from IRF8 ChIP on Chip revealed 15 genes in common. 2 of the 15 genes (Gbp6 and H2-T24) were also identified as potential targets common to IRF1 and IRF8 by ChIP on Chip. Gbp2 and H2-T24 represent interesting target genes for study and validation as high confidence targets of IRF8 and possibly, IRF1. Taken together, our data provides a set of novel IRF8 and IRF1 targets that may be studied to further our understanding of the regulatory networks controlled by IRF1 and IRF8 in the context of immunity. Résumé: Les facteurs régulateurs interférons (IRFs) sont une famille de régulateurs transcriptionnels essentiels à la différenciation et la croissance cellulaire, à l’oncogénèse et au bon maintien du système immunitaire. IRF1 et IRF8 jouent un role clé dans l’immunité de l’organisme par la régulation de la différenciation des lignées cellulaires myéloïdes, nottament le développement de cellules immunitaires comme les macrophages, les cellules tueuses naturelles (NK) et les cellules dendritiques. Ces deux facteurs de transcription sont indispensables pour la résistance aux infections virales et bactériennes. Nous avons optimisé une technique d’immunoprécipitation de la chromatine (ChIP) afin d’y utiliser des anticorps ciblant IRF1 et IRF8, et ce à partir d’une lignée cellulaire J774 suivant un stimulation par interféron gamma et par oligonucléotides CpG (IFNγ/CpG). En combinant cette technique ChIP à un microarray 244K comprenant exons et promoteurs (ChIP on Chip), nous avons identifiés respectivement 201 et 303 sites d’ancrages pour chacun de IRF1 et IRF8. Certaines cibles transcriptionnelles déjà connues pour IRF1 (OAS1b) et IRF8 (IFNb) ainsi que de nouveaux loci de control transcriptionel ont été identifiés. Parmi les catégories par fonction relevées par Ontologie de gène (GO), une des catégories majeures des deux listes de gènes générées fut pour les gènes reliés à la ‘‘réponse immunitaire’’. La comparaison entre les gènes cibles de transcription pour IRF1 et IRF8 par ‘‘ChIP on Chip’’ a révélé 19 gènes représentés dans les deux cas. La majeure partie de ces gènes sont reliés à la ‘‘réponse immunitaire’’ par GO et ils incluent les cibles suivantes avec détection très significative: Gbp6, Mx2, Tnfsf13b, H2-T24, et Ifit1. En parallèle, des macrophages dérivés de la moëlle osseuse de souris (BMDMs) furent utilisés pour l’étude du profile transcriptionel par microarray d’une génération F2 générée avec des souris Balb/C (IRF8-wildtype) et des souris BXH2 (IRF8-mutant). Ces BMDMs comprenant les allèles normale et mutante d’IRF8 ont été infectés avec Legionella pneumophila ou stimulés avec IFNγ/CpG pour identifer les gènes dépendant d’IRF8 dans le cadre d’une infection. Pour chaque traitement, l’expression de respectivement 1171 et 852 gènes furent observés comme étant modifiés selon la situation relative à IRF8 dans les expériences d’infections et de stimulations. Selon leur intéraction avec les allèles d’IRF8 et pour chaque traitement des BMDBs, une liste de gènes fut établie avec haut niveau de confiance comprenant 31 et 129 gènes pour chacun des types de stimulation par Legionelle et par IFNγ/CpG, respectivement. Ces deux listes de gènes comprennent 7 gènes en commun, deux appartenant à la voie de signalement JAK-STAT (IL10 et Ccd1). La comparaison en les listes de gènes générées dans les expériences de stimulation IFNγ/CpG par microarray ainsi que celles générées par les expériences ‘‘ChIP on Chip’’ avec IRF8 ont révélés 15 gènes en commun. Deux de ces 15 gènes (Gbp6 et H2-T24) ont aussi été identifiés comme cibles potentielles pour IRF1 en plus de IRF8 par ‘‘ChIP on Chip’’. Gpb2 et H2-T24 représentent des gènes cibles intéressants pour d’autres séries d’études et de validations comme étant des cibles à haut niveau de confiance pour IRF8 et possiblement, IRF1. En somme, ces résultats fournissent un nouveau répertoire de cibles pour IRF1 et IRF8 qui pourront être étudiées pour approfondir nos connaissances sur les réseaux de régulation controlés par IRF1 et IRF8 dans le maintien de l’immunité de l’organisme. Table of Contents 1. Introduction 4 1.1 Rationale .................................................................................................................. 4 1.2 Specific aims of the project ...................................................................................... 5 1.3 Interferons ................................................................................................................ 5 1.3.1 Interferons as a family .....................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Human Stem Cells from Single Blastomeres Reveal Pathways of Embryonic Or Trophoblast Fate Specification Tamara Zdravkovic1,2,3,4,5,‡, Kristopher L
    © 2015. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd | Development (2015) 142, 4010-4025 doi:10.1242/dev.122846 STEM CELLS AND REGENERATION RESEARCH ARTICLE Human stem cells from single blastomeres reveal pathways of embryonic or trophoblast fate specification Tamara Zdravkovic1,2,3,4,5,‡, Kristopher L. Nazor6,‡, Nicholas Larocque1,2,3,4,5, Matthew Gormley1,2,3,4,5, Matthew Donne1,2,3,7, Nathan Hunkapillar1,2,3,4,5, Gnanaratnam Giritharan8, Harold S. Bernstein4,9, Grace Wei4,10, Matthias Hebrok10, Xianmin Zeng11, Olga Genbacev1,2,3,4,5, Aras Mattis4,12, Michael T. McMaster4,5,13, Ana Krtolica8,*, Diana Valbuena14, Carlos Simón14, Louise C. Laurent6,15, Jeanne F. Loring6 and Susan J. Fisher1,2,3,4,5,7,§ ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION For many reasons, relatively little is known about human Mechanisms of initial cell fate decisions differ among species. To gain preimplantation development. The small number of cells makes insights into lineage allocation in humans, we derived ten human embryos of any species difficult to study. In humans, the technical embryonic stem cell lines (designated UCSFB1-10) from single difficulties are compounded by other challenges. Genetic variation blastomeres of four 8-cell embryos and one 12-cell embryo from a among individuals could contribute to developmental differences, a single couple. Compared with numerous conventional lines from well-appreciated phenomenon in the mouse (Dackor et al., 2009), blastocysts, they had unique gene expression and DNA methylation which is difficult to assess in humans owing to the limited patterns that were, in part, indicative of trophoblast competence. At a availability of embryos that are donated for research.
    [Show full text]
  • A Molecular Switch from STAT2-IRF9 to ISGF3 Underlies Interferon-Induced Gene Transcription
    ARTICLE https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-10970-y OPEN A molecular switch from STAT2-IRF9 to ISGF3 underlies interferon-induced gene transcription Ekaterini Platanitis 1, Duygu Demiroz1,5, Anja Schneller1,5, Katrin Fischer1, Christophe Capelle1, Markus Hartl 1, Thomas Gossenreiter 1, Mathias Müller2, Maria Novatchkova3,4 & Thomas Decker 1 Cells maintain the balance between homeostasis and inflammation by adapting and inte- grating the activity of intracellular signaling cascades, including the JAK-STAT pathway. Our 1234567890():,; understanding of how a tailored switch from homeostasis to a strong receptor-dependent response is coordinated remains limited. Here, we use an integrated transcriptomic and proteomic approach to analyze transcription-factor binding, gene expression and in vivo proximity-dependent labelling of proteins in living cells under homeostatic and interferon (IFN)-induced conditions. We show that interferons (IFN) switch murine macrophages from resting-state to induced gene expression by alternating subunits of transcription factor ISGF3. Whereas preformed STAT2-IRF9 complexes control basal expression of IFN-induced genes (ISG), both type I IFN and IFN-γ cause promoter binding of a complete ISGF3 complex containing STAT1, STAT2 and IRF9. In contrast to the dogmatic view of ISGF3 formation in the cytoplasm, our results suggest a model wherein the assembly of the ISGF3 complex occurs on DNA. 1 Max Perutz Labs (MPL), University of Vienna, Vienna 1030, Austria. 2 Institute of Animal Breeding and Genetics, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Vienna 1210, Austria. 3 Institute of Molecular Biotechnology of the Austrian Academy of Sciences (IMBA), Vienna 1030, Austria. 4 Research Institute of Molecular Pathology (IMP), Vienna Biocenter (VBC), Vienna 1030, Austria.
    [Show full text]
  • A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of Β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus
    Page 1 of 781 Diabetes A Computational Approach for Defining a Signature of β-Cell Golgi Stress in Diabetes Mellitus Robert N. Bone1,6,7, Olufunmilola Oyebamiji2, Sayali Talware2, Sharmila Selvaraj2, Preethi Krishnan3,6, Farooq Syed1,6,7, Huanmei Wu2, Carmella Evans-Molina 1,3,4,5,6,7,8* Departments of 1Pediatrics, 3Medicine, 4Anatomy, Cell Biology & Physiology, 5Biochemistry & Molecular Biology, the 6Center for Diabetes & Metabolic Diseases, and the 7Herman B. Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN 46202; 2Department of BioHealth Informatics, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN, 46202; 8Roudebush VA Medical Center, Indianapolis, IN 46202. *Corresponding Author(s): Carmella Evans-Molina, MD, PhD ([email protected]) Indiana University School of Medicine, 635 Barnhill Drive, MS 2031A, Indianapolis, IN 46202, Telephone: (317) 274-4145, Fax (317) 274-4107 Running Title: Golgi Stress Response in Diabetes Word Count: 4358 Number of Figures: 6 Keywords: Golgi apparatus stress, Islets, β cell, Type 1 diabetes, Type 2 diabetes 1 Diabetes Publish Ahead of Print, published online August 20, 2020 Diabetes Page 2 of 781 ABSTRACT The Golgi apparatus (GA) is an important site of insulin processing and granule maturation, but whether GA organelle dysfunction and GA stress are present in the diabetic β-cell has not been tested. We utilized an informatics-based approach to develop a transcriptional signature of β-cell GA stress using existing RNA sequencing and microarray datasets generated using human islets from donors with diabetes and islets where type 1(T1D) and type 2 diabetes (T2D) had been modeled ex vivo. To narrow our results to GA-specific genes, we applied a filter set of 1,030 genes accepted as GA associated.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Single-Cell Mrna Profiling Reveals Heterogeneous Combinatorial Expression of Hoxd Genes During Limb Development Short Title
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/327619; this version posted May 22, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Single-cell mRNA profiling reveals heterogeneous combinatorial expression of Hoxd genes during limb development Short title: Single-cell Hox combinations in developing limbs Authors : P. J. Fabre1,4,*, M. Leleu1, B. Mascrez2, Q. Lo Giudice4, J. Cobb3 and D. Duboule1,2,* Affiliations: 1School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale, Lausanne, 1015 Lausanne, Switzerland. 2Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, 1211 Geneva 4, Switzerland. 3Department of Biological Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada. 4Department of Basic Neurosciences, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland. KEYWORDS: Hox genes, digits, limb, development, enhancers, single-cell, transcriptome, differentiation, gene expression. *Corresponding authors: Pierre Fabre ([email protected]) and Denis Duboule ([email protected]) HIGHLIGHTS • Collinear expression of Hox genes is only weaved at the tissue scale • Enhancer-sharing to specific target genes is reduced at the single-cell level • Hoxd gene combinatorial expression is linked to distinct transcriptional signatures • In presumptive digits, Hoxd combinations follow a pseudotime trajectory 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/327619; this version posted May 22, 2018. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license.
    [Show full text]
  • Partner-Regulated Interaction of IFN Regulatory Factor 8 with Chromatin Visualized in Live Macrophages
    Partner-regulated interaction of IFN regulatory factor 8 with chromatin visualized in live macrophages Leopoldo Laricchia-Robbio*, Tomohiko Tamura*, Tatiana Karpova†, Brian L. Sprague†, James G. McNally†, and Keiko Ozato*‡ *Laboratory of Molecular Growth Regulation, National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-2753; and †Laboratory of Receptor Biology and Gene Expression, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-5055 Edited by Laurie H. Glimcher, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, and approved August 18, 2005 (received for review May 17, 2005) IFN regulatory factor (IRF) 8 is a transcription factor that directs protein–protein interactions on fluorescence recovery have not macrophage differentiation. By fluorescence recovery after pho- been extensively studied. Moreover, many FRAP studies so far tobleaching, we visualized the movement of IRF8-GFP in differen- reported are qualitative, lacking quantitative insight into the tiating macrophages. Recovery data fitted to mathematical models chromatin-binding events. More recent efforts to fit FRAP data revealed two binding states for IRF8. The majority of IRF8 was to mathematical models begin to provide a clearer knowledge on highly mobile and transiently interacted with chromatin, whereas the property of FRAP mobility (16, 17). a small fraction of IRF8 bound to chromatin more stably. IRF8 IRF8, a member of the IFN regulatory factor (IRF) family, is mutants that did not stimulate macrophage differentiation a key factor that guides the development of macrophages (18). showed a faster recovery, revealing little interaction with chro- We previously established an in vitro model system where matin. A macrophage activation signal by IFN-␥͞LPS led to a global IRF8Ϫ/Ϫ myeloid progenitor cells called Tot2 differentiate into slowdown of IRF8 movement, leading to increased chromatin macrophages upon IRF8 introduction (19).
    [Show full text]
  • An Ontogenetic Switch Drives the Positive and Negative Selection of B Cells
    An ontogenetic switch drives the positive and negative selection of B cells Xijin Xua, Mukta Deobagkar-Lelea, Katherine R. Bulla, Tanya L. Crockforda, Adam J. Meadb, Adam P. Cribbsc, David Simsc, Consuelo Anzilottia, and Richard J. Cornalla,1 aMedical Research Council Human Immunology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, OX3 9DS Oxford, United Kingdom; bMedical Research Council Molecular Haematology Unit, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, OX3 9DS Oxford, United Kingdom; and cMedical Research Council, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, Centre for Computational Biology, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, OX3 9DS Oxford, United Kingdom Edited by Michael Reth, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany, and approved January 6, 2020 (received for review September 3, 2019) + Developing B cells can be positively or negatively selected by self- BM HSCs increased CD5 B-1a B cell development (15), while antigens, but the mechanisms that determine these outcomes are expression of let-7b in FL pro-B cells blocked the development of incompletely understood. Here, we show that a B cell intrinsic B-1 B cells (17). These findings support the notion of hard-wired switch between positive and negative selection during ontogeny differences during ontogeny, but possibly downstream of the HSC is determined by a change from Lin28b to let-7 gene expression. commitment stage. Ectopic expression of a Lin28b transgene in murine B cells restored Several lines of evidence also suggest that B-1 B cells can un- the positive selection of autoreactive B-1 B cells by self-antigen in dergo positive selection, which is linked to their B cell receptor adult bone marrow.
    [Show full text]
  • An Immunoevasive Strategy Through Clinically-Relevant Pan-Cancer Genomic and Transcriptomic Alterations of JAK-STAT Signaling Components
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/576645; this version posted March 14, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. An immunoevasive strategy through clinically-relevant pan-cancer genomic and transcriptomic alterations of JAK-STAT signaling components Wai Hoong Chang1 and Alvina G. Lai1, 1Nuffield Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, OX3 7FZ, United Kingdom Since its discovery almost three decades ago, the Janus ki- Although cytokines are responsible for inflammation in nase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription cancer, spontaneous eradication of tumors by endoge- (STAT) pathway has paved the road for understanding inflam- nous immune processes rarely occurs. Moreover, the matory and immunity processes related to a wide range of hu- dynamic interaction between tumor cells and host immu- man pathologies including cancer. Several studies have demon- nity shields tumors from immunological ablation, which strated the importance of JAK-STAT pathway components in overall limits the efficacy of immunotherapy in the clinic. regulating tumor initiation and metastatic progression, yet, the extent of how genetic alterations influence patient outcome is far from being understood. Focusing on 133 genes involved in Cytokines can be pro- or anti-inflammatory and are inter- JAK-STAT signaling, we found that copy number alterations dependent on each other’s function to maintain immune underpin transcriptional dysregulation that differs within and homeostasis(3).
    [Show full text]
  • The CXCR4 Antagonist AMD3100 Impairs Survival of Human AML Cells and Induces Their Differentiation
    Leukemia (2008) 22, 2151–2158 & 2008 Macmillan Publishers Limited All rights reserved 0887-6924/08 $32.00 www.nature.com/leu ORIGINAL ARTICLE The CXCR4 antagonist AMD3100 impairs survival of human AML cells and induces their differentiation S Tavor1, M Eisenbach1, J Jacob-Hirsch2, T Golan1, I Petit1, K BenZion1, S Kay1, S Baron1, N Amariglio2, V Deutsch1, E Naparstek1 and G Rechavi2 1Institute of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel and 2Cancer Research Center, Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel The chemokine stromal cell-derived factor-1 (SDF-1) and its NOD/SCID mice, homing and subsequent engraftment of human receptor, CXCR4, participate in the retention of acute myelo- normal or AML stem cells are dependent on the expression of cell blastic leukemia (AML) cells within the bone marrow micro- 9–12 environment and their release into the circulation. AML cells surface CXCR4 and SDF-1 produced within the murine. In also constitutively express SDF-1-dependent elastase, which addition to controlling cell motility, SDF-1 regulates cell regulates their migration and proliferation. To study the proliferation, induces cell cycle progression and acts as a survival molecular events and genes regulated by the SDF-1/CXCR4 factor for normal human stem cells and AML cells.13–16 axis and elastase in AML cells, we examined gene expression CXCR4 blockage in AML cells, using the polypeptide profiles of the AML cell line, U937, under treatment with a RCP168, enhanced chemotherapy-induced apoptosis in vitro.17 neutralizing anti-CXCR4 antibody or elastase inhibitor, as compared with non-treated cells, using DNA microarray Most importantly, high CXCR4 expression level in leukemic technology.
    [Show full text]
  • Genome-Wide DNA Methylation Analysis of KRAS Mutant Cell Lines Ben Yi Tew1,5, Joel K
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of KRAS mutant cell lines Ben Yi Tew1,5, Joel K. Durand2,5, Kirsten L. Bryant2, Tikvah K. Hayes2, Sen Peng3, Nhan L. Tran4, Gerald C. Gooden1, David N. Buckley1, Channing J. Der2, Albert S. Baldwin2 ✉ & Bodour Salhia1 ✉ Oncogenic RAS mutations are associated with DNA methylation changes that alter gene expression to drive cancer. Recent studies suggest that DNA methylation changes may be stochastic in nature, while other groups propose distinct signaling pathways responsible for aberrant methylation. Better understanding of DNA methylation events associated with oncogenic KRAS expression could enhance therapeutic approaches. Here we analyzed the basal CpG methylation of 11 KRAS-mutant and dependent pancreatic cancer cell lines and observed strikingly similar methylation patterns. KRAS knockdown resulted in unique methylation changes with limited overlap between each cell line. In KRAS-mutant Pa16C pancreatic cancer cells, while KRAS knockdown resulted in over 8,000 diferentially methylated (DM) CpGs, treatment with the ERK1/2-selective inhibitor SCH772984 showed less than 40 DM CpGs, suggesting that ERK is not a broadly active driver of KRAS-associated DNA methylation. KRAS G12V overexpression in an isogenic lung model reveals >50,600 DM CpGs compared to non-transformed controls. In lung and pancreatic cells, gene ontology analyses of DM promoters show an enrichment for genes involved in diferentiation and development. Taken all together, KRAS-mediated DNA methylation are stochastic and independent of canonical downstream efector signaling. These epigenetically altered genes associated with KRAS expression could represent potential therapeutic targets in KRAS-driven cancer. Activating KRAS mutations can be found in nearly 25 percent of all cancers1.
    [Show full text]
  • SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL Bone Morphogenetic Protein 4 Promotes
    www.intjdevbiol.com doi: 10.1387/ijdb.160040mk SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL corresponding to: Bone morphogenetic protein 4 promotes craniofacial neural crest induction from human pluripotent stem cells SUMIYO MIMURA, MIKA SUGA, KAORI OKADA, MASAKI KINEHARA, HIROKI NIKAWA and MIHO K. FURUE* *Address correspondence to: Miho Kusuda Furue. Laboratory of Stem Cell Cultures, National Institutes of Biomedical Innovation, Health and Nutrition, 7-6-8, Saito-Asagi, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-0085, Japan. Tel: 81-72-641-9819. Fax: 81-72-641-9812. E-mail: [email protected] Full text for this paper is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1387/ijdb.160040mk TABLE S1 PRIMER LIST FOR QRT-PCR Gene forward reverse AP2α AATTTCTCAACCGACAACATT ATCTGTTTTGTAGCCAGGAGC CDX2 CTGGAGCTGGAGAAGGAGTTTC ATTTTAACCTGCCTCTCAGAGAGC DLX1 AGTTTGCAGTTGCAGGCTTT CCCTGCTTCATCAGCTTCTT FOXD3 CAGCGGTTCGGCGGGAGG TGAGTGAGAGGTTGTGGCGGATG GAPDH CAAAGTTGTCATGGATGACC CCATGGAGAAGGCTGGGG MSX1 GGATCAGACTTCGGAGAGTGAACT GCCTTCCCTTTAACCCTCACA NANOG TGAACCTCAGCTACAAACAG TGGTGGTAGGAAGAGTAAAG OCT4 GACAGGGGGAGGGGAGGAGCTAGG CTTCCCTCCAACCAGTTGCCCCAAA PAX3 TTGCAATGGCCTCTCAC AGGGGAGAGCGCGTAATC PAX6 GTCCATCTTTGCTTGGGAAA TAGCCAGGTTGCGAAGAACT p75 TCATCCCTGTCTATTGCTCCA TGTTCTGCTTGCAGCTGTTC SOX9 AATGGAGCAGCGAAATCAAC CAGAGAGATTTAGCACACTGATC SOX10 GACCAGTACCCGCACCTG CGCTTGTCACTTTCGTTCAG Suppl. Fig. S1. Comparison of the gene expression profiles of the ES cells and the cells induced by NC and NC-B condition. Scatter plots compares the normalized expression of every gene on the array (refer to Table S3). The central line
    [Show full text]
  • Transcription Factor IRF8 Directs a Silencing Programme for TH17 Cell Differentiation
    ARTICLE Received 17 Aug 2010 | Accepted 13 Apr 2011 | Published 17 May 2011 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms1311 Transcription factor IRF8 directs a silencing programme for TH17 cell differentiation Xinshou Ouyang1, Ruihua Zhang1, Jianjun Yang1, Qingshan Li1, Lihui Qin2, Chen Zhu3, Jianguo Liu4, Huan Ning4, Min Sun Shin5, Monica Gupta6, Chen-Feng Qi5, John Cijiang He1, Sergio A. Lira1, Herbert C. Morse III5, Keiko Ozato6, Lloyd Mayer1 & Huabao Xiong1 TH17 cells are recognized as a unique subset of T helper cells that have critical roles in the pathogenesis of autoimmunity and tissue inflammation. Although OR Rγt is necessary for the generation of TH17 cells, the molecular mechanisms underlying the functional diversity of TH17 cells are not fully understood. Here we show that a member of interferon regulatory factor (IRF) family of transcription factors, IRF8, has a critical role in silencing TH17-cell differentiation. Mice with a conventional knockout, as well as a T cell-specific deletion, of the Irf8 gene exhibited more efficient TH17 cells. Indeed, studies of an experimental model of colitis showed that IRF8 deficiency resulted in more severe inflammation with an enhanced TH17 phenotype. IRF8 was induced steadily and inhibited TH17-cell differentiation during TH17 lineage commitment at least in part through its physical interaction with RORγt. These findings define IRF8 as a novel intrinsic transcriptional inhibitor of TH17-cell differentiation. 1 Immunology Institute, Department of Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, New York 10029, USA. 2 Department of Pathology, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York 10029, USA.
    [Show full text]
  • 1714 Gene Comprehensive Cancer Panel Enriched for Clinically Actionable Genes with Additional Biologically Relevant Genes 400-500X Average Coverage on Tumor
    xO GENE PANEL 1714 gene comprehensive cancer panel enriched for clinically actionable genes with additional biologically relevant genes 400-500x average coverage on tumor Genes A-C Genes D-F Genes G-I Genes J-L AATK ATAD2B BTG1 CDH7 CREM DACH1 EPHA1 FES G6PC3 HGF IL18RAP JADE1 LMO1 ABCA1 ATF1 BTG2 CDK1 CRHR1 DACH2 EPHA2 FEV G6PD HIF1A IL1R1 JAK1 LMO2 ABCB1 ATM BTG3 CDK10 CRK DAXX EPHA3 FGF1 GAB1 HIF1AN IL1R2 JAK2 LMO7 ABCB11 ATR BTK CDK11A CRKL DBH EPHA4 FGF10 GAB2 HIST1H1E IL1RAP JAK3 LMTK2 ABCB4 ATRX BTRC CDK11B CRLF2 DCC EPHA5 FGF11 GABPA HIST1H3B IL20RA JARID2 LMTK3 ABCC1 AURKA BUB1 CDK12 CRTC1 DCUN1D1 EPHA6 FGF12 GALNT12 HIST1H4E IL20RB JAZF1 LPHN2 ABCC2 AURKB BUB1B CDK13 CRTC2 DCUN1D2 EPHA7 FGF13 GATA1 HLA-A IL21R JMJD1C LPHN3 ABCG1 AURKC BUB3 CDK14 CRTC3 DDB2 EPHA8 FGF14 GATA2 HLA-B IL22RA1 JMJD4 LPP ABCG2 AXIN1 C11orf30 CDK15 CSF1 DDIT3 EPHB1 FGF16 GATA3 HLF IL22RA2 JMJD6 LRP1B ABI1 AXIN2 CACNA1C CDK16 CSF1R DDR1 EPHB2 FGF17 GATA5 HLTF IL23R JMJD7 LRP5 ABL1 AXL CACNA1S CDK17 CSF2RA DDR2 EPHB3 FGF18 GATA6 HMGA1 IL2RA JMJD8 LRP6 ABL2 B2M CACNB2 CDK18 CSF2RB DDX3X EPHB4 FGF19 GDNF HMGA2 IL2RB JUN LRRK2 ACE BABAM1 CADM2 CDK19 CSF3R DDX5 EPHB6 FGF2 GFI1 HMGCR IL2RG JUNB LSM1 ACSL6 BACH1 CALR CDK2 CSK DDX6 EPOR FGF20 GFI1B HNF1A IL3 JUND LTK ACTA2 BACH2 CAMTA1 CDK20 CSNK1D DEK ERBB2 FGF21 GFRA4 HNF1B IL3RA JUP LYL1 ACTC1 BAG4 CAPRIN2 CDK3 CSNK1E DHFR ERBB3 FGF22 GGCX HNRNPA3 IL4R KAT2A LYN ACVR1 BAI3 CARD10 CDK4 CTCF DHH ERBB4 FGF23 GHR HOXA10 IL5RA KAT2B LZTR1 ACVR1B BAP1 CARD11 CDK5 CTCFL DIAPH1 ERCC1 FGF3 GID4 HOXA11 IL6R KAT5 ACVR2A
    [Show full text]