<<

(CANCERRESEARCH39,5087-5092, December19791 0008-5472/79/0039-0000$02.00 Effects of Triphosphates on Human Reductase from Molt-4F Cell&

ChlHsiung chang2 and Yung-chi Cheng3

Department of Experimental Therapeutics, Roswell Park Memorial Institute, New York State Department of Health, Buffalo, New York 14263

ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

The effects of nucleoside triphosphates on various nucleo The specificity of nibonucleotide reductase obtained from side diphosphate reductions catalyzed by a highly purified bacterial sources has been reported to be strongly influenced nbonucleotide reductase from MoIt-4F cultured human cells by different nucleoside tniphosphates (1, 10, 11, 16). Reduc were examined. It was found that 5'-tmiphos tion of pymimidine nibonucleotides catalyzed by the phate strongly inhibitedall four reductions.The reduction of system from Escherichia co!i B was stimulated by ATP and nucleoside diphosphate in the presence of an acti dTTP. GOP reduction was stimulated by dTTP, and AOP reduc vaton [ 5'-tniphosphate (ATP)] was inhibited in a tion was stimulated by dGTP (1 0, 11). dATP strongly inhibited noncompetitive manner with respect to ATP by deoxyguano all 4 reductions. Moreover, COP and UDP inhibited the meduc sine 5'-trlphosphate (dGTP) and deoxythymidine 5'-tniphos tion of each other in the enzyme system from E. co!i B (10). phate (dTTP). For 5'-diphosphate reduction, the value The regulation of the reduction of nibonucleotides to deoxyni of the K, intercept for dGTP was 47 @tMandfor dTTP, it was bonucleotides has also been described for enzyme obtained 270 @u@i;theK slope was 25 @MfordGTP, 100 g@MfordTTP. from mammalian systems (1 2—14).The reduction of pynimidine Similarly, for unidine diphosphate reduction, the K intercept nucleoside diphosphates required ATP as activator for the was 4.3 @LMfordGTP, 25 @sMfordTTP. The K slope was 1.5 enzyme system from Novikoft tumor (12). Reduction of ADP @zMfor dGTP and 9 @LMfordTTP. The reduction of ADP in the and GOP required, respectively, dGTP and dTTP as activators. presence of its activator (dGTP) was inhibited noncompetitively Reduction of pynimidine nibonucleoside diphosphates was in by dTTP. The values of K intercept and slope of dTTP for hibited by dATP, dGTP, dTTP, and dUTP, reduction of GOP adenosine 5'-diphosphate (ADP) reduction were 1.8 and 0.9 was inhibited by dATP and dGTP, and reduction of ADP was mM, respectively. Although 5'-tniphosphate(GTP) inhibited by dATP. Similar results have been obtained with the and dGTP were found to serve equally well as activators for enzyme of rat embryos (13) and chick embryo (14), and calf ADP reductions with the same apparent K,, and Vmax,the thymus (9). inhibition pattern of GTP and dGTP on the enzyme activity for The regulation of the reduction of mibonucleotidesto deoxy cytidine 5'-diphosphate reduction was different. ATP was found by the enzyme obtained from human Molt-4F to be an accessory activator for ADP reduction due to the fact cells has now been studied (3). In this communication, we have that ATP at 1.0 or 0.3 mM concentration decreased the appar further studied the effects of nucleoside tniphosphates on the ent K@ofGTP for ADP reduction from 1.1 to 0.14 or 0.08 m@i, enzyme from this cell line. respectively. In the absence of ATP, the V@ for ADP reduction was increased 2-fold. ATP at a concentration of 1.0 or 0.3 m@ MATERIALS AND METHODS also changed the apparent Ka of dTTP for guanosine 5'-di phosphate reduction from 1.25 to 0.9 or 0.6 @M,respectively, Materials. All the materials used were same as those de but V,,,@for guanosine 5'-diphosphate reduction was in scmibedin the preceding paper (5). creased. Preparation of the Enzyme Components. Molt-4F mibonu GTP at a concentration of 0.3 or 0.5 m@idecreased the cleotide reductase was prepared as described previously (4). apparent Ka'S of ATP for pynimidine nucleoside reduction. At All of the studies reported here were performed using the these concentrations of GTP, the Vm@for cytidine 5'-diphos reconstituted enzyme from the components after the final step phate reduction was decreased 7 and 12%, and the Vmaxfor of purification (phenyl Sephamose for Component A and sucrose 5'-diphosphate reduction was decreased 33 and 45% density gradient centnifugation for Component B). when they were compared with those in the absence of GTP. Enzyme Assays. COPreductasewas assayedbythe method Therefore, a change in any of these nucleotideconcentrations of Steeper and Steuart (15), and ADP reductase activity was could lead to changes in nibonucleotide reductase activity. ATP determined by the method of Cory et a!. (8). The details for emerges as a most important factor in controlling the reduction assaying ADP, COP, UOP, and GOP were described in the of all four nbonucleoside diphosphates. preceding paper (5). Each experiment was repeated at least 3 times, and assays were done in duplicate. Protein Determination. Protein concentrationswere deter 1 This work was supported by USPHS Project Grant CA-i 8499 and Core mined by the method of Bradford (2). Bovine serum albumin GrantCA-i3038fromtheDivisionofCancerTreatment,NationalCancerInstitute, NIH.DepartmentofHealth,Education,andWelfare. was used as the standard. 2 Present address: Department, Southern Research Institute, 2000 Ninth Avenue South, Birmingham, Ala. 35205. RESULTS 3 An American Leukemia Society Scholar. To whom requests for reprints shouldbeaddressed.Presentaddress:DepartmentofPharmacology,University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, N. C. 27514. Effects of Nucleoside Tniphosphateson CDP, UDP, ADP, ReceivedJune22, 1979;acceptedSeptember17, 1979. and GOP Reductions in the Presence of the Best Activators.

DECEMBER 1979 5087

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 1979 American Association for Cancer Research. C-H. Chang and V-c. Cheng

The effects of various nucleoside triphosphates at a concentra 20 tion of 2.5 mM on the enzyme activities for COP, UOP, ADP, and GDP reductions in the presence of the best activators are I00 shown in Table 1. In the absence of nucleoside tniphosphates, >@ except for the best activators, the enzyme activities for all 4 > .@ 80 reductions were determined and set as 100%. dATP was the 0 most potent inhibitor among those nucleoside tniphosphates 0 tested. It inhibited the enzyme activities for all 4 reductions at a concentration of 2.5 [email protected] the concentration of dATP was at 0.25 mM,as shown in Table 1 (numbers in parentheses), I:: dATP was still the most potent inhibitor. dTTP inhibited the reduction of COP, UOP, and AOP; dGTP inhibited the reduction 20 of pynimidine nucleoside diphosphates. However, ATP at a concentration of 2.5 m@islightly stimulated the reduction of GOP in the presence of the best activator, dTTP. Although GTP and dGTP served equally well as activators for AOP reduction, dGTP (X—X),and GTP (0-0); mM dGTP was a more potent than was Chart 1. Effects of GTP and dGTP on the enzyme activity for COP reduction. Standard incubation conditions for CDP reduction were used. Each reaction GTP as an inhibitor of COP meductase activity. mixture contained 14 @gofpurified Component A and 12 @zgofpurified Compo Different Effects of GTP and dGTP on the Enzyme Activity nentB of ribonucleotidereductaseobtainedfromMolt-4Fcells. for CDP Reduction. The effects of GTP and dGTP on the enzyme activity for COPreduction were different. The inhibition dGT@M pattern of these nucleoside triphosphates is shown in Chart 1. I00 Al 2r I 30 When the concentration of GTP and dGTP was varied, and the io[@ @( 25

enzyme activity for COP reduction in the presence of activator I/I' 81. 1 20 Intercept6 I 5 Slope (ATP) was measured, it was observed that dGTP at a concen (x—xI4 I 0 tration higher than 0.1 mt@igavemore than 50% inhibition of 2 0.5 lIz' the enzyme activity. However, GTP at a concentration of be @@L( III 25 tween 0.1 and 0.3 mM slightly increased the enzyme activity. -50 50 50 dGTF@j@M Inhibition was seen at GTP concentrations higher than 1.0 mt@i. Inhibition Constants for dGTP on the Enzyme Activity for 0 CDP and UDP Reductions. The inhibitionconstantsfor dGTP on the enzyme activity for pymimidinenucleoside diphosphate reduction are shown in Chart 2. The pattern of inhibition and

kinetic constants are determined according to the definition of ATP1, mM' Cleland (7). The concentration of ATP was varied for COP or UOP reduction at several fixed concentrations of dGTP. By IB) means of double reciprocal plots, it was demonstrated that 50 05 dGTP behaved as a noncompetitive inhibitor with respect to I/v 40@@@J04 Intercept I Slope @ ATP for COP (Chart 2A) and UOP reduction (Chart 28). The )X—X) 103 0@ 20 ..@02 @-@-@;?0 .101

@ Table 1 .4.3-2-I ; @ diphosphatereductionsEffects of various nucleoside triphosphates on ribonucleotide dGTP,/.LM dGTt@/.LM catalyzed byinthe derived from Molt-4F cells activatorThe presence of the best 50 activatorforconcentrations used for the activator are all at 2.5 mM.The best lIz' GDPreduction,COP and UDP reduction is ATP; for ADP reduction, it is GTP; for reductionwasit is dTTP. The enzyme activity for CDP, UDP,ADP, and GDP 85, 110, 110 and 92 pmol/hr, respectively.%

ofactivityUDP -10 -05 0.5 10 GDPNTP reduc- ADP reduc- ATP1, mM1 duction8None(2.5 mM) CDP reductiona tiona tionC Chart 2. Effects of dGTP on the Lineweaver-Burk plots of the reciprocal of 100 100 100 100 activator concentration with respect to the reciprocal of reaction velocity (nmol ATP130UTP 100 100 NDb of produced in 1 hr). Standard incubation conditions were 119GTP 68 ND 100 used except for addition of activator at the indicated concentration. Each assay NDCTP 63 25 (79) 100 contained 14 @gofpurified Component A and 12 @gofpurified Component B of 103dATP ND 1 (52) 92 ribonucleotide reductase obtained from Molt-4F cells. A, reduction of COP; B, 42dUTP 2 (28)c 0 (15) 0 (9) reduction of UDP. 118dTTP 52 (100) 1 (44) 86 111dGTP 31 (67) 0 (26) 26 (85) 95dCTP 10 (30) 0 (15) 100 values of Ki and of K1s for dGTP for COP reduction were 70 22(80) 100 104 calculated based on the meplotand gave the values of 47 and a The purified Components A and B are used. 25 @&M,respectively(Chart 2A). The values of Ki and of Ks for b ND, not determined. dGTP for UOP reduction were 4.3 and 1.5 jIM, respectively C Numbers in parentheses, percentage of activity produced by various NTP at 0.25 mM concentration. (Chart 2B).

5088 CANCERRESEARCHVOL. 39

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 1979 American Association for Cancer Research. Human Ribonucleotide Reducíase

Inhibition Constants for dTTP on the Enzyme Activities for (A) CDP, UDP, and ADP Reduction. Results of an examination of inhibition by dTTP of the enzyme activities for CDP, UDP, and IO ADP reduction are shown in Chart 3. dTTP inhibited these reductions noncompetitively with respect to the activators (i.e., ATP as activator for CDP and UDP reduction or dGTP as activator for ADP reduction). The values of K, intercept and of K, slope of dTTP with respect to dGTP for ADP reduction were 1.8 and 0.9 mM (Chart 3C). The values of K, intercept and of K, slope of dTTP with respect to ATP for CDP reduction were 270 and 100 fiM (Chart 3/4). The values of K, intercept and of K, slope of dTTP with respect to ATP for UDP reduction were 25 -WO -I20 -IOO -80 -6O -40 -20 20CDP~',mWl 40 50 (B) 60- GTP/nM (A) 0

-40 -32 -24

IB)

Chart 4. Effects of GTP on the kinetic constants of (A) substrate (CDP) and (B) activator (ATP) for CDP reduction. The unit of reaction velocity is nmol of •40 -20 20 40 deoxyribonucleotides produced in 1 hr. Standard incubation conditions were dTTP,/iM used except for (A) substrate and (B) activator concentration. Each assay contained 14 /ig of purified Component A and 12 ng of purified Component B of ribonucleotide reducíase obtained from Molt-4F cells.

and 9 /tM (Chart 38). These K,'s of dTTP for UDP reduction were the lowest among those of inhibition constants of dTTP on these reductions tested. Effects of GTP on the Kinetic Constants of Substrates and Activators for Pyrimidine Nucleoside Diphosphate Reduc tion. It was shown in Chart 1 that GTP at a concentration less than 0.5 mM slightly stimulated the enzyme activity for CDP 1C) reduction. This observation led us to study the influence of GTP on the kinetic constants of CDP and of ATP for CDP reduction. The results are shown in Chart 4. GTP at a concen 8 -It -10 -6 -2 246 tration of 0.3 mM did not change the Km and Vma»ofCDP for CDP reduction substantially (Chart 4/4). However, GTP at a concentration of 0.3 or 0.5 mM decreased the apparent Kn of ATP from 0.63 ±0.03 (S.E.) mM to 0.45 ±0.05 or 0.35 ± 0.02 mM, respectively (Chart 46). The Vmaxfor CDP reduction was also decreased by GTP at those concentrations tested. Since ATP is the common activator for CDP and UDP reduc tion, the effects of GTP on apparent Ka of ATP and Km of UDP for UDP reduction were also examined. The results are shown in Chart 5. As was the case for CDP reduction, GTP did not change the Km of CDP or the V™«forCDP reduction substan Chart 3. Effects of dTTP on the Lineweaver-Burk plots of the reciprocal of activator concentration with respect to the reciprocal of reaction velocity (nmol tially (Chart 5/4). However, GTP at a concentration of 0.3 or of deoxyribonucleotides produced in 1 hr). Standard incubation conditions were 0.5 mM significantly decreased the apparent Ka of ATP from used except for addition of activator at the indicated concentration. Each assay 1.25 ±0.1 Oto 0.27 ±0.01 and 0.3 ±0.01 mM, respectively contained 14 ^g of purified Component A and 12 fig of purified Component B of (Chart 56). The Vmax'sfor UDP reduction were also decreased. ribonucleotide reducíase obtained from Molt-4F cells. A. reduction of CDP; ß, reduction of UDP; C. reduction of ADP. Effects of ATP on the Kinetic Constants of Substrates and

DECEMBER 1979 5089

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 1979 American Association for Cancer Research. C-H. Chang and V-c. Cheng

reduction of GOP was inhibited by dATP. The results obtained (A) GTP,mM are similar to those using the enzyme system from Novikoff tumor (12), rat embryo (13), and chick embryo (14). A summary of the inhibition constants of dATP, dGTP, and dTTP on each mibonucleoside diphosphate reduction is shown in Table 2. They all behaved as noncompetitive inhibitors with respect to the activator of the reduction studied. Some of the inhibitors studied could act also as activators for other nibonucleoside diphosphate reductions, and this suggested that the activator for reduction of a given nibonucleoside diphosphate may not bind to the enzyme at the same site or to the enzyme in the

I I i@f same conformation as it does when acting as inhibitor. —40 -30 -20 -10 l0 20 30 40 We observed that GTP and dGTP served equally well as (B) uDP-I,mM'1 4C activators for ADP reduction. The apparent K,,of GTP or dGTP for AOP reduction was the same, 1.1 mi@,i(4).However, the 30 effects of GTP and dGTP on the enzyme activity for COP reduction with ATP as the activator were different. dGTP was GTP,mM I/V 20 a more potent inhibitor than GTP for the enzyme activity of COP reduction. This suggests that the binding behaviors of GTP and 0 dGTP to the enzyme are not the same. Different nucleoside

IIIII diphosphates change the binding behavior of dGTP, as mdi -40 -3.2 -2.4 -1.6 -0.8 0.8 1.6 2.4 12 4.0 cated by the observations that the K of dGTP for UOPreduction ATPI mM1 is much lower than the K of dGTP for COP reduction. In the

Chart 5. Effects of GTP on the kinetic constants of (A) substrate (UDP) and (B) activator (ATP) for UDP reduction. The unit of reaction velocity is nmol of deoxyribonucleotides produced in 1 hr. Standard incubation conditions were (A) used except for (A) substrate and (B) activator concentration. Each assay contained 14 ;Lgof purified Component A and 12 @igofpurified Component B of ribonucleotide reductase obtained from Molt-4F cells.

Activators for Nucleoside Diphosphate Reduction. 60 30 ATP slightly stimulated GOP reduction in the presence of the .1.40 activator, dTTP, as shown in Table 1. The effects of ATP on V 30 GOP reduction in the presence of dTTP were further studied 20

based on the change of the kinetic constants of GOPand dTTP !,,!@-@-@1-@ for GOP reduction. The results are shown in Chart 6. ATP at a -90 -70 -50 -30 -10ATP,mN1090GDP@,mM'@ 30 50 70 concentration of 1 mM produced a small decrease in the Km'S of GOP but increased the Vmaxfor GOP reduction (Chart 6A). However, ATP at a concentration of 0.3 or 1 mM changed the apparent K5of dTTP from 1.25 ±0.1 1 to 0.6 ±0.1 or 0.9 ± 0.05 @LM,respectively, but Vmax'Sfor GOP reduction were in creased by those concentrations of ATP tested (Chart 6B). (I) ATP,mM ATP at a concentration of 1 or 0.3 m@ also changed the 140 apparent K,,of GTP for ADP reduction from 1.1 ±0.09 to 0.14 ± 0.04 or 0.08 ± 0.01 mM, respectively, as shown in Chart 120 7B, a result similar to the effects of ATP on GOP reduction. 100 However, the Vmax'5weredecreased by the addition of ATP at I those concentrations tested. ATP at a concentration of 1 mM V 80 @O.3 did not decrease the Kmof ADP for ADP reduction as shown in Chart 7A. 40 DISCUSSION @T@1;;@/: Several reports have indicated that nibonucleotide meductase @ from E. co!i and from mammalian cells is highly regulated by .1400 - 1000 -.600 - 200 200 ‘600 $000 nucleoside tniphosphates (1, 10—14).The effects of nucleoside dTTP', mM― tniphosphates on the enzyme activity of human Molt-4F cells in Chart 6. Effects of ATP on the kinetic constants of (A) substrate (GOP) and the presence of the best activator for each specific reduction (B) activator (dTTP) for GOP reduction. The unit of reaction velocity is nmol of were investigated. The reduction of pynimidine nucleoside di deoxyribonucleotides produced in 1 hr. Standard incubation conditions were used except for (A) substrate and (B) activator concentration. Each assay phosphates was inhibited by dATP, dGTP, and dTTP; the contained 14 @ogofpurified Component A and 12 @igofpurified Component B of reduction of ADP was inhibited by dATP and by dTTP; the ribonucleotide reductase obtained from Molt-4F cells.

5090 CANCERRESEARCHVOL. 39

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 1979 American Association for Cancer Research. Human Ribonuc!eotide Reductase

substantially the apparent K@of GTP for ADP reduction. The (A) apparent K8 of GTP was 1 m@i,which is higher than the 40 concentration of GTP (about 0.3 mM) in cells (6). The addition

. of ATP at 0.3 or 1 mM concentration, which is a physiological concentration, decreased the apparent K8for GTP to a physi I/v 20 ological level of about 0.08 or 0.14 mM, respectively. These results indicate that ATP may serve as an accessory activator @-@° 10 to lower the apparent K@of GTP for ADP reduction within the cell. Although the apparent K8 of dTTP for GOP reduction is @ -10-5ATP,mMIS(B) l@ within physiological concentration, the addition of ATP to de @p-I,mM@1 crease K@andincrease VmaxofdTTP for GOPreduction appears to be required to drive the reduction more efficiently. Moreover, AlP,mM the addition of GTP also decreased the apparent Ka of ATP. Although the apparent K8's of ATP for pynimidine nucleoside diphosphate reduction are within the intracellular concentration IV:. /0 range, it seems that GTP also served to decrease the apparent 1.0 K3 of ATP for COP and UDP reduction to accomplish more 20- 0.3 efficient reduction of the substrate. The decrease of apparent I L...... —'—t―@P―II I I I K3's of activators can be considered as a consequence of -is -12 -6 -4 246810 potentiation by ATP or GTP of the binding affinity of activators GTV1,mM1 for the enzyme. Results obtained in this study support the concept that intracellular mibonucleotide reductase activity is Chart7. Effectsof ATPon the kineticconstantsof(A)substrate(ADP)and (B) activator (GTP) for ADP reduction. The unit of reaction velocity is nmol of regulated by the steady state level of various . A deoxyrlbonucleotides produced in 1 hr. Standard incubation conditions were change in any of these concentrations could lead to used except for (A) substrate and (B) activator concentration. Each assay changes in nibonucleotide reductase activity. ATP emerges as contained 14 g@gofpurified Component A and 12 @tgofpurified Component B of rlbonucleotidereductaseobtainedfromMolt-4Fcells. an important factor in controlling the reduction of all 4 nibonu cleoside diphosphates.

Table 2 onribonucleosideThe inhibition constants of various deoxynucleoside triphosphates reductasefromdiphosphate reductions catalyzed by ribonucleotide ACKNOWLEDGMENTS substrateTheMolt-4F cells in the presence of excess amount of We wish to thank Linda Roberts and Susan Grill for their excellent technical replotsofkinetic constants (K's of intercept and slope) are obtained by the assistance. interceptsandslopesversusinhibitorsasshowninCharts23.Inhibitor and (gLM)dTTP

dATPVariableSubstrate dGTP REFERENCES

K,,CDP activator K,@1' K, K,. K,, K,1 • 1. Beck, W. S. Regulation of cobamide-dependent ribonucleotide reductase by allosteric effectors and divalent cations. J. Biol. Chem., 242: 3148—3158, 40uDP AlP 100 270 25 47 40 1967. 55GOP ATP 9 25 1.5 4.3 55 2. Bradford, M. M. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of micro 1500ADP dTTP 1500 gram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal. dGTP 900 1800 4 4 Biochem., 72: 248-254, 1976. Km.Kzof slope. 3. Chang, C-H. , and Cheng, V-c. Kinetic behavior of ribonucleotide reductase a @,,@,ofintercept. from human Molt-4F cells. Fed. Proc., 38: 484, 1979. 4. Chang, C-H., and Cheng, V-c. Demonstration of two components and association of - reductase from cultured human lymphoblast cells (MoIt-4F). Cancer Res., 39: 436—442, reduction of CDP and UDP, the binding of dGTP to the enzyme 1979. is affected by the presence of ATP since the value of the K 5. Chang, C-H., and Cheng, V-c. Substrate specificity of human ribonucleotide reductase from Molt-4F cells. Cancer Ass., 39: 5081 —5086,1979. intercept is different from that of the K slope. The influence of 6. Cheng. V-c., Goz, B., and Prusoff, W. H. metabolism in the binding behavior of nucleoside tniphosphates by other herpes simplex virus infected HeLa cells. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 390: 253-263, 1975. nucleoside triphosphates or diphosphates also is evident in the 7. Cleland, W. W. Determining the chemical mechanism of enzyme-catalyzed observations that the same nucleoside tniphosphate has differ reactions by kinetic studies. Adv. Enzymol., 45: 273—387,1977. ent K, slopes and K, intercepts for different nibonucleoside 8. Cory, J. G., Russell, F. A., and Mansell, M. M. A convenient assay for ADP reductase activity using Dowex-1-borate columns. Anal. Biochem., 55: 449— diphosphate reductions (Table 2). 456, 1973. Moore and Hurlbert (12) have reported that ATP at a lower 9. Eriksson, S., Thelander, L., and Akerman, M. Allosteric regulation of calf concentration (about 0. 15 mM) activates the reduction of GOP thymus ribonucleotide diphosphate reductase. Biochemistry, 18: 2948— 2952, 1979. when dTTP is also present. In this laboratory, it was also found 10. Larsson, A., and Reichard, P. Enzymatic synthesis of deoxyribonucleotides. that ATP at a higherconcentration(2.5 mM)slightlystimulated IX. Allostericeffectsin the reductionof pyrimidineribonucleotidesbythe diphosphate reductase system of E. coIl. J. Biol. Chem., the enzyme activity for GOP reduction in the presence of dTTP, 241: 2533-2539, 1966. as shown In Table 1. Results of a kinetic study revealed that 11. Larsson, A., and Reichard, P. Enzymatic synthesis of deoxyribonucleotides. ATP increased the Vmaxanddecreased the apparent Kaof dTTP x. Reductionofpurineribonucleotides,allostericbehaviorandsubstrate specificityoftheenzymesystemfromEscherichiacoliB.J.Biol.Chem., for GOP reduction. Moreover, ATP not only decreased the 241: 2540-2549, 1966. apparent K. of dTTP for GOP reduction, but it also decreased 12. Moore, E. C., and Hurlbert, R. B. Regulation of mammaliandeoxyribonucle

DECEMBER 1979 5091

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 1979 American Association for Cancer Research. C-H. Chang and V-c. Cheng

otide by nucleotides as activators and inhibitors. J. Biol. Chem., Biol. Chem., 236: 2514—2519,1961. 24 1: 4802-4809, 1966. 15. Steeper, J. A., and Steuart, C. 0. A rapid assay for COP reductase activity 13. Murphree, S., Moore, E. C., and Beall, P. T. Regulation by nucleotides of in mammalian cell extracts. Anal. Biochem., 34: 123—130,1970. the activity of partially purified ribonucleotide reductase from rat embryos. 16. Vitols, E., Brownson, C., Gardiner, W., and Blakley, A. L. Cobamides and Cancer Res., 28: 860—863,1968. ribonucleotide reduction. V. A kinetic study of the ribonucleoside triphos 14. Reichard, P., Cannellakis, Z. N., and Canellakis, E. S. Studies on a possible phate reductase of Lactobacillus leichmannii. J. Biol. Chem., 242: 3035— regulatory mechanism for the biosynthesis of deoxyribonucleic acids. J. 3041 , 1967.

5092 CANCER RESEARCH VOL. 39

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 1979 American Association for Cancer Research. Effects of Nucleoside Triphosphates on Human Ribonucleotide Reductase from Molt-4F Cells

Chi-Hsiung Chang and Yung-chi Cheng

Cancer Res 1979;39:5087-5092.

Updated version Access the most recent version of this article at: http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/39/12/5087

E-mail alerts Sign up to receive free email-alerts related to this article or journal.

Reprints and To order reprints of this article or to subscribe to the journal, contact the AACR Publications Subscriptions Department at [email protected].

Permissions To request permission to re-use all or part of this article, use this link http://cancerres.aacrjournals.org/content/39/12/5087. Click on "Request Permissions" which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center's (CCC) Rightslink site.

Downloaded from cancerres.aacrjournals.org on September 30, 2021. © 1979 American Association for Cancer Research.